Threecaster wrote:I think it may have been you, Brook, that posited that I live in more than one reality simultaneously. Since you seem to have a bend for the physics mindset, have you looked into Julian Barbour's work? I've just now found out about him (Thank You Through The Wormhole!), and it seems his notions are in line with the way I think things unfold.
As best I understand it, Barbour's POV is that our world goes by like a series of photographs. Time does not exist for the photos. Time is what we experience when we move from one photo to the next.
As I see things, we live in dream soup multiverse. Everything that ever has and ever will be, and all things thought, known and unknown exist NOW. All pasts, all futures...etc. Which also means all our past and future lives are all happening right now. But I'll get back to that in a minute. (now THERE's an ironic statement...)
Here's my take from another thread:
Just as we have persistence of vision, and we fail to notice the individual frames of the movie, we also posses Persistence of Reality, in which we fail to notice that our reality is rapidly switching on and off. When it is ON, we get a perception. When it is OFF, our perceptions are off as well, but there are lots of other embedded realities that are still ON when ours are OFF. (increasing your awareness will subvert this process somewhat). Then when it turns ON again, things are slightly different.
OK....the relatively simple act of moving your hand from the keyboard to the mouse.
1) From within your core, due to a myriad of motivations, you create INTENT. In this case the intent is stated above.
2) The right half of your brain communicates to the SOURCE your INTENT. This INTENT is encoded into the particles that compose you and your environment. When the reality switches OFF, all those particles go quantum, crossing the veil and converting to virtual particles. These virtual particles carry your information of INTENT to the SOURCE (infinity), where it is analyzed against (hmmm...I dunno...Akashic Record? Master Reference? A Jar Of Mustard?) {Maybe it;s asking all your other you's what you think... )
3) I suspect at this point the virtual particles, with their information suitably modified from their encounter with the SOURCE, condense themselves together and turn your reality back ON. Except this time there are Subtle Differences.
NOTE: Technically, each iteration is likely happening at the Planck level, or maybe even deeper; I suspect the true nature of these Subtle Differences involve the electrons appearing at a different place in their shells....or even faster and smaller, but (IMHO) this is encountered everytime someone struggles with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg%27s_Uncertainty_Principle
4) Now, as the nature of the INTENT was in accordance with Natural Law, or Fate, or what Your EveryOnes agreed upon, your next series of realities turns ON and OFF in (very) rapid succession, with each one activating with your hand that much closer to the mouse.
5) Now - After a zillion, trillion realities are cycled through, your hand reaches the mouse.
I'm just about completely convinced this is a reasonable version of who it works. (what!?) ....of HOW it works.
(Who and How are interconnected...kewl! )
My only big problem with this explanation is it IS reasonable. Something about it being chock full of reason bothers me tho....
By alerting our consciousness (aaah! there it is again!) ALTERING our consciousness and awareness, we are modifying our very frequency of existence, and expanding our perceptual filters. (mediation, DMT, etc)
It stands to reason that if the reality I was in a few minutes ago is a different reality now, then the past must be different as well. It's only the past because we remember it. Here is where my logic starts to break down. There is an underlying continuity that allows you to return home and know where everything is, whether you remember it or not.
What I'm trying to say here is....I think we can "hijack" this process, and manifest things that have no history in this continuity.
Actually, they do....but it is a different one than the you that is here and now has (had) (will have) of an object with a traditional continuity. *whew!*
In other words, if something does not make sense...it's OK! (don't ask too many questions or it will go away!) Why is it so hard to accept things at face value?
If you cultivate suitable circumstances, where the boundaries are less defined, this greatly encourages these sorts of "Miracles". Actually, they are only miracles if they are in stark contrast to our senses. Otherwise this sh1t goes on all time.
Maybe this occurs in the same way that it is easier to sneak a few people into a rock fesitval, than a government installation.
In regards to intuition: There is nothing new under the sun. I'm actually in favor of Don Juan Matus' idea of "direct knowledge". The video about the gorilla and perception is a bit too shallow for me. It's not cutting deep enough into the meta of the matter.
(meta? MEAT! my fingers know more than I do!) Seems their definition of intuition is differnt than mine...
When your current YOU is vibrationally resonant with many of your other you's, the avenues of communication are more open. This allows for deja-vu, claraaudience, and some forms of "direct" knowing.
You and your environment form a symbiotic relationship. (at least if you are having healthy thoughts and actions!) Gaining an understanding of how this "Feedback Loop" works for you is integral for many many beneficial aspects of our new ways of living.
To me, this is a large part of intuition.
The other thing I'd like to mention here is increasing your vibration (of your thoughts, as well as your physical being) will increase your awareness. Increasing your awareness will help you to "syncronize" with your other you's.
A fun little exercise I like to do is imagine mys elf sitting in my chair, and doing all the things I can possible do and still be sitting in the chair. Then I imagine them all (or at least a bunch of them.... "all" is hard! Stranges my brains!) overlapping one another. Then I try and "feel" which ones are closest, or most nearby. Every once in a while, they become real!
It's really neat!
I think you could travel to any splace, in any context, even totally "fictitious" places, just by changing your vibration. You just have to match your vibration of existence to match precisely to where you want to be. "How do I do this?" you may ask. You are already doing it, you are matching the vibration of where you currently are so well, that you are absolutely convinced that you ARE there, and it would be difficult to show you otherwise.
(The secret, if you are convinced that you are there, then you are!)
So you have to tune the vibration of your perceptions so finely, that you cannot tell the difference of being somewhere else.
The problem is the in-betweens. We so expect (like really, really, expect) that we have to go "A - B - C - D - E ..." that the least little encounter with "A - B - D - E ..." we get completly hijacked and go "What happened to C! AAAAAAHHHH!!" and it we revert instantaneously.
So if you do encounter "E" before "C", then pretend it's normal! Interesting things maybe happening!.
Sorry Threecaster I missed this post. I've not been around here much due to unfortunate circumstance. Untimly death of my son would be one the other is of no consequence.
I'm not familiar with Julian's work. However I did briefly look him up and his time theory which would coincide with lot's of what I've been working on.
in 2011 Einstein's theory was proven:
Intuition and Signal non locality....Entanglement proves to be quite interesting when a professor of String theory finds Dual Error correcting codes ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q1LCVknKUJ4
Then there is this..........
Fermi Coordinates of an Observer Moving in a Circle in Minkowski Space:
Apparent Behavior of Clocks
Apparent Behavior of Clocks
Thomas B. Bahder
Army Research Laboratory
2800 Powder Mill Road
Adelphi, Maryland USA 20783
(February 7, 2008)
Coordinate transformations are derived from global Minkowski coordinates to the Fermi coordinates of an observer moving in a circle in Minkowski space-time.
The metric for the Fermi coordinates is calculated directly from the tensor transformation rule. The behavior of ideal clocks is examined from the observer’s reference frame using the Fermi coordinates. A complicated relation exists between Fermi coordinate time and proper time on stationary clocks (in the Fermi frame) and between proper time on satellite clocks that orbit the observer. An orbital Sagnac-like effect exists for portable clocks that orbit the Fermi coordinate origin. The coordinate speed of light isisotropic but varies with Fermi coordinate position and time. The magnitudes of these kinematic effects are computed for parameters that are relevant to the Global Positioning System (GPS) and are found to be small; however, for future high-accuracy time transfer systems, these effects may be of significant magnitude.
I. INTRODUCTION
During the past several decades there have been significant advances in the accuracy of satellite-based navigation
and time transfer systems [1]. The most recent example of such a system is the Global Positioning System (GPS),
which is run by the U. S. Department of Defense [2–4]. The GPS is based on a network of 24 atomic clocks in space,
from which a user can receive signals and compute his position and time. The order of magnitude of the accuracy
of the GPS currently is ten meters and twenty nanoseconds [5]. Future navigation and time transfer systems are
being contemplated that will have several orders of magnitude better position accuracy and sub-nanosecond time accuracy
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9811009v1.pdf
During Encounters with the Quantum I ran into a scientist I will not name but will quote here:
"a Turkish laser scientist we are waiting word from the Templeton Foundation on a proposal we submitted : Rumi and Astronomy., Freeman Dyson is one of the judges at Chicago U.The research addresses the fundamental properties of rotation shared by both biological consciousness and planetary bodies. My part examines the role non - euclidean geometry plays in our understanding of space and time - my current ongoing work. I began with Minkowskian Relativity inpsired by P.D.Ouspenski's The Fourth Dimension."
More to come if I'm permitted.