CAMELOT - Kerry's response to Bills interview 'Rulers of the World' with Charles 1/2/11

reality=check wrote:Gawd. Nearly forgot. Right near the start of that interview. Did anyone pick up on the insinuation that Charlie boy was an instigator of the PA1 take down and the Bill Kerry split? How very convenient for the newbs on PA2 that don't know it was an inside job.

Oliver wrote:

reality=check wrote:Gawd. Nearly forgot. Right near the start of that interview. Did anyone pick up on the insinuation that Charlie boy was an instigator of the PA1 take down and the Bill Kerry split? How very convenient for the newbs on PA2 that don't know it was an inside job.

Well, very interesting, isn't it? It gives a clearer picture. I will ask Bill on PA2 to see what will be his answer.

Greetings,

reality=check wrote:Gawd. Nearly forgot. Right near the start of that interview. Did anyone pick up on the insinuation that Charlie boy was an instigator of the PA1 take down and the Bill Kerry split? How very convenient for the newbs on PA2 that don't know it was an inside job.

reality=check wrote:What a complete and utter load of bollocks this interview is. Firstly, I can't remember a cockney that isn't full of crap.

malletzky wrote:I would just have one question, but I will have to assume something first.

Let's assume that I'm the one, or two...or one of the "33" that rules this world. Assuming this, I can tell you two things:

First, I would never ever want to "go public" i.e. to be even known to exist. Why? You all know the answer to this. Rule in secrecy is the best ruleship or dominion.

Second, even if I decide to "go public" just as "the 33" did (did they really???), I would choose something much bigger then choosing someone, call him "Charles" and let that someone do a video with Bill. Oh, c'mon !?!?!?

So back to may question:

Why "the 33" suddenly decided to go public? And why did they choose this approach? This all doesn#m make sense. Not at all.

regards
mall...

enemyofNWO wrote:

malletzky wrote:I would just have one question, but I will have to assume something first.

Let's assume that I'm the one, or two...or one of the "33" that rules this world. Assuming this, I can tell you two things:

First, I would never ever want to "go public" i.e. to be even known to exist. Why? You all know the answer to this. Rule in secrecy is the best ruleship or dominion.

Second, even if I decide to "go public" just as "the 33" did (did they really???), I would choose something much bigger then choosing someone, call him "Charles" and let that someone do a video with Bill. Oh, c'mon !?!?!?

So back to may question:

Why "the 33" suddenly decided to go public? And why did they choose this approach? This all doesn#m make sense. Not at all.

regards
mall...

Mall,

The 33 did not go public but they used a tool called Charles . The 33 could not use anybody else but an expendable person like "Charles " who was put there to propagate an idea and he was their mouthpiece . Please notice how convinced he appeared to be when speaking about " Culling the population " . He really thinks that those nincompoops are right and they provide leadership ! With leadership like that who needs enemies ? Charles is obvious a crim and even he knows that showing his face in public might be too dangerous . This is exactly why they prefer to be in the shadow , behind the curtains .

burgundia wrote:Ditto malletzky, ditto Trancoso!!

malletzky wrote:I would just have one question, but I will have to assume something first.

Let's assume that I'm the one, or two...or one of the "33" that rules this world. Assuming this, I can tell you two things:

First, I would never ever want to "go public" i.e. to be even known to exist. Why? You all know the answer to this. Rule in secrecy is the best ruleship or dominion.

Second, even if I decide to "go public" just as "the 33" did (did they really???), I would choose something much bigger then choosing someone, call him "Charles" and let that someone do a video with Bill. Oh, c'mon !?!?!?

So back to may question:

Why "the 33" suddenly decided to go public? And why did they choose this approach? This all doesn't make sense. Not at all.

regards
mall...

Floyd wrote:I find the whole episode a monumental distraction and a complete waste of ones time.

Floyd wrote:Still very amusing though. Bill was scared stiff.The guys a thug but thats about it...Loooking forward to the next rubbish interview with a not very interesting person who has something useful to say and who isnt full of crap...keep em coming Avalon..youre doing a mighty fine job.

SiriArc wrote:

hard not to be crass

with a pole

up your flamein' a s s

Andromeda wrote:
Viking on AV1 makes an interesting point about birds and fish die outs happening only on western supporting countries, it is food for thought

mudra wrote:

Andromeda wrote:
Viking on AV1 makes an interesting point about birds and fish die outs happening only on western supporting countries, it is food for thought

It would be nice you give us a link to it or just copy it and paste it on the " 5OOO birds thread " .

http://www.themistsofavalon.net/t1608-5000-dead-birds

Thank You Andromeda .

Love from me
mudra

lawlessline wrote:

reality=check wrote:What a complete and utter load of bollocks this interview is. Firstly, I can't remember a cockney that isn't full of crap.

Glad to see you are not bias or preprogrammed in your open mind judgement. Thats the sacastic part of the reply. As for the info in this interview, info it was not, more a point of view that was interesting.