Aquaries1111 Corner

Dog Fight

A documentary by The Thunderbolts Project regarding the emerging Plasma Universe paradigm.

http://www.holoscience.com

210b Rod Spine = Serpent Kundalini

My favorite 3:

Canonum De Ius Rex
Canons of Sovereign Law

Article 153 - Chess

Canon 6604

Chess is a two-player game each possessing sixteen (16) pieces representing the core elements of a sovereign state played on a sixty four (64) alternate colored square board representing the city, land and sea according to certain articles (art) of law and craft of procedures. Since the 13th Century, Chess has remained the highest training tool in the art of statecraft within the Roman-Venetian Legal System.

Canon 6605

Chess is directly derived from game called “Shatranj” commissioned during the reign of the first leader of the Persian Aryan Empire named ArdaShah I (224-244 CE). In 1223, the great Venetian Doxi (Doge) Giovanni Bernadone Morosini (1223 - 1252) was elected under major structural reforms and introduced a modification of shantranj as “Chess” as part of a complete new architecture of statecraft. The State for each player was represented by six (6) pieces being:

(i) Two (2) major crowns being Church (Queen) and State (King); and

(ii) Two (2) major agents and judges of the major crowns being Bishop (Queen’s Bishop) and Prime Minister (King’s Bishop); and

(iii) Two (2) military and enforcement agents of the major crowns and agents being the Knight Order (Queen’s Knight) and the Sheriff (King’s Knight); and

(iv) Two (2) administrative and clerical agents of the major crowns being the Priest (Queen’s Rook) and the Clerk (King’s Rook); and

(v) Four (4) guilds of higher “arts” of humanities of the Queen’s (Church) side being the four pawns known as the Arts; and
(vi) Four (4) guilds of lesser practical “crafts” of the King’s (State) side being four pawns known as the Craft; and
(vii) The sixteen (16) pieces together representing the complete State and City and Land; and
(viii) The eight ( pieces on the Church (Queen’s side) representing the Private; and
(ix) The eight ( pieces on the State (King’s side) representing the Public; and
(x) The four (4) pieces of the back row with the Church (Queen) representing the Temple Quarter of the City; and
(xi) The four (4) pieces of the front row of the Church (Queen) representing the Administrative Quarter of the City; and
(xii) The four (4) pieces of the back row with the State (King) representing the Palace Quarter of the City; and
(xiii) The four (4) pieces the front row of the State (King) representing the Merchant Quarter of the City; and
(xiv) The sixteen (16) squares in front of the State, City and Land representing the Sea; and
(xv) The Great Council of noble families controlling the Roman Cult, the law of the Sea and the city states is represented by the Board itself.

Canon 6606

In assigning specific roles and guilds to the pawns of Chess, the following was the occult designation of pieces:
(i) Queen's Knight's Pawn being gate keepers, toll guards, keepers of the city; and

(ii) King's Knight's Pawn being blacksmiths, whitesmiths, goldsmiths, carpenters and masons; and

(iii) Queen's Rook's Pawn being Rybaulders, Dice Players, Messengers and Couriers; and

(iv) King's Rook's Pawn being Labourers, Workmen and Farmers: i.e. estate workers and land serfs; and

(v) Queen's Alphyn's Pawn being Taverners, Hostelers, and Vitayllers; and

(vi) King's Alphyn's Pawn being Notaries, Advocats, Scriveners, Clerks, Drapers, Clothmakers, Tailors, Weavers, and Skinners; and

(vii) Queen's Pawn being Universities, Education, Sociology and Economics; i.e. Knowledge, Sciences, Arts and Government; and

(viii) King's Pawn being Commerce, Banking, Records, Registrars, Rolls, Accounting, Treasury.

Canon 6607

In reference to the “craft” of the game of Chess, the establishment of Chess as a literal representation and visualization of statecraft established certain rules that remain the bedrock of Roman-Venetian Law today:

(i) All action by Church and State, excluding those few noble families that control the board and game, is constrained by the geography of the board and rules; and

(ii) An action or “move” may represent an instrument or reply, by auricular exchange and debate or by physical attack or defense; and

(iii) A State (player) may only perform one move at a time; and

(iv) The strength of an action is determined not only by strategic position but the power and authority of the piece undertaking the action; and

(v) Once a game (controversy) commences, it must be resolved by one of three results being defeat, resignation or draw. Abandoning the game is equivalent to resignation.

(vi) Once a game (controversy) commences a party cannot change sides, change standing, nor undo a previous step. Any breach or failure to follow the rules is equivalent to resignation.

Canon 6608

The effect of Chess was immediate and global with all European states adopting chess, its rules as a fundamental component of statecraft. However, since the 20th Century, the study of the Art and Game of Chess has been in rapid decline.

Canon 6609

In the 14th Century, the Game of Chess was officially recognized as the core discipline and function of global Roman - Venetian commercial law with the creation of the Curia Regis ad Scaccarium, literally translated as “Court of the King’s Chessboard”, also known as the Court of the Exchequer as the treasury office for handling the financial affairs of all the guilds (livery), the King and the realm of England.

Canon 6610

Since the 20th Century and the decline in knowledge of the Art and Game of Chess, officials within the Roman - Venetian commercial and legal system are less inclined to honor and adhere to the rules of Chess in matters of controversy, even though they are solemnly bound by their oaths to their craft to do so.


http://one-heaven.org/canons/sovereign_law/article/153.html

Dr. Greer discusses the following topics:

The highly secretive and ruthless group (MJ-12, Majestic, Cosmic-Ops, PI-40) that is behind the UFO cover-up.

The 'Norway Spiral'.

The Orion Project's efforts working with breakthrough technology that would eliminate the need for fossil fuel based technologies.

The reason behind the ruthless secrecy of the Extraterrestrial and UFO subjects.

Dr. Greer's personal story including his experiences with Extraterrestrials.

The mind-set of the ruthless group known as Majestic-12 (MJ-12, Majestic, Cosmic-Ops, PI-40).

So-called "Gray" aliens are in fact man-made PLFs (Programmed Life Forms).

So-called 'alien implants' are man-made devices.

The reason why there is fear mongering of the Extraterrestrial subject.

So-called 'alien abductions' are in fact carried out by covert human groups.

The massive amount of disinformation on the Extraterrestrial subject. This disinformation has infected the UFO subculture.

Dr. Greer has held the body of an 18 inch sized Extraterrestrial.

The connection between consciousness and the Extraterrestrial subject.

The logical fallacy of the so-called ET "threat" argument.

Scalar weapon systems (Directed Energy Weapons, Electromagnetic Weapons) that orbit Earth and target Extraterrestrial vehicles.

CSETI (not to be confused with SETI) experiences with Extraterrestrials.

The limitations of space and time as we currently understand them - how this relates to Extraterrestrials.

The covert plan by the highly secretive and ruthless group (MJ-12, Majestic, Cosmic-Ops, PI-40) to stage an alien "attack" on Earth.

The stupidity of the so-called alien "hybrid" theory pushed by certain individuals in the UFO subculture.

I'm upstairs on my outside balcony from the bedroom and had a moment with the bees here and the hive they have created in the tree top parallel my view..

Loving the Bees.

Free Book

http://arcticbeacon.com/books/Almanac_of_Evil.pdf

http://www.one-faith-of-god.org/

http://one-jerusalem.org/

The Green Book (attached as pdf)

Muammar Al Qaddafi

PART ONE - THE INSTRUMENT OF GOVERNMENT

The instrument of government is the prime political problem confronting human
communities (The problem of the instrument of government entails questions of the
following kind. What form should the exercise of authority assume? How ought societies
to organize themselves politically in the modern world?)
Even conflict within the family is often the result of the failure to resolve this problem of
authority. It has clearly become more serious with the emergence of modern societies.
People today face this persistent question in new and pressing ways. Communities are
exposed to the risks of uncertainty, and suffer the grave consequences of wrong answers.
Yet none has succeeded in answering it conclusively and democratically. THE GREEN
BOOK presents the ultimate solution to the problem of the proper instrument of
government.
All political systems in the world today are a product of the struggle for power between
alternative instruments of government. This struggle may be peaceful or armed, as is
evidenced among classes, sects, tribes, parties or individuals. The outcome is always the
victory of a particular governing structure - be it that of an individual, group, party or class
- and the defeat of the people; the defeat of genuine democracy.
Political struggle that results in the victory of a candidate with, for example, 51 per cent of
the votes leads to a dictatorial governing body in the guise of a false democracy, since 49
per cent of the electorate is ruled by an instrument of government they did not vote for,
but which has been imposed upon them. Such is dictatorship. Besides, this political
conflict may produce a governing body that represents only a minority. For when votes
are distributed among several candidates, though one polls more than any other, the sum
of the votes received by those who received fewer votes might well constitute an
overwhelming majority. However, the candidate with fewer votes wins and his success is
regarded as legitimate and democratic! In actual fact, dictatorship is established under the
2
cover of false democracy. This is the reality of the political systems prevailing in the world
today. They are dictatorial systems and it is evident that they falsify genuine democracy.
PARLIAMENTS
Parliaments are the backbone of that conventional democracy prevailing in the world
today. Parliament is a misrepresentation of the people, and parliamentary systems are a
false solution to the problem of democracy. A parliament is originally founded to represent
the people, but this in itself is undemocratic as democracy means the authority of the
people and not an authority acting on their behalf. The mere existence of a parliament
means the absence of the people. True democracy exists only through the direct
participation of the people, and not through the activity of their representatives.
Parliaments have been a legal barrier between the people and the exercise of authority,
excluding the masses from meaningful politics and monopolizing sovereignty in their
place. People are left with only a facade of democracy, manifested in long queues to cast
their election ballots.
To lay bare the character of parliaments, one has to examine their origin. They are either
elected from constituencies, a party, or a coalition of parties, or are appointed. But all of
these procedures are undemocratic, for dividing the population into constituencies means
that one member of parliament represents thousands, hundreds of thousands, or millions
of people, depending on the size of the population. It also means that a member keeps few
popular organizational links with the electors since he, like other members, is considered
a representative of the whole people. This is what the prevailing traditional democracy
requires. The masses are completely isolated from the representative and he, in turn, is
totally removed from them. Immediately after winning the electors' votes the
representative takes over the people's sovereignty and acts on their behalf. The prevailing
traditional democracy endows the member of parliament with a sacredness and immunity
which are denied to the rest of the people. Parliaments, therefore, have become a means
of plundering and usurping the authority of the people. It has thus become the right of the
people to struggle, through popular revolution, to destroy such instruments - the so-called
parliamentary assemblies which usurp democracy and sovereignty, and which stifle the
will of the people. The masses have the right to proclaim reverberantly the new principle:
no representation in lieu of the people.
If parliament is formed from one party as a result of its winning an election, it becomes a
parliament of the winning party and not of the people. It represents the party and not the
people, and the executive power of the parliament becomes that of the victorious party
and not of the people. The same is true of the parliament of proportional representation in
which each party holds a number of seats proportional to their success in the popular
vote. The members of the parliament represent their respective parties and not the people,
and the power established by such a coalition is the power of the combined parties and
not that of the people. Under such systems, the people are the victims whose votes are
vied for by exploitative competing factions who dupe the people into political circuses that
are outwardly noisy and frantic, but inwardly powerless and irrelevant. Alternatively, the
people are seduced into standing in long, apathetic, silent queues to cast their ballots in
the same way that they throw waste paper into dustbins. This is the traditional democracy
prevalent in the whole world, whether it is represented by a one-party, two-party,
multiparty or non-party system. Thus it is clear that representation is a fraud.
Moreover, since the system of elected parliaments is based on propaganda to win votes, it
is a demagogic system in the real sense of the word. Votes can be bought and falsified.
Poor people are unable to compete in the election campaigns, and the result is that only
the rich get elected. Assemblies constituted by appointment or hereditary succession do
not fall under any form of democracy.
3
Philosophers, thinkers, and writers advocated the theory of representative parliaments at
a time when peoples were unconsciously herded like sheep by kings, sultans and
conquerors. The ultimate aspiration of the people of those times was to have someone to
represent them before such rulers. When even this aspiration was rejected, people waged
bitter and protracted struggle to attain this goal.
After the successful establishment of the age of the republics and the beginning of the era
of the masses, it is unthinkable that democracy should mean the electing of only a few
representatives to act on behalf of great masses. This is an obsolete structure. Authority
must be in the hands of all of the people.
The most tyrannical dictatorships the world has known have existed under the aegis of
parliaments.
THE PARTY
The party is a contemporary form of dictatorship. It is the modern instrument of dictatorial
government. The party is the rule of a part over the whole. As a party is not an individual, it
creates a superficial democracy by establishing assemblies, committees, and propaganda
through its members. The party is not a democratic instrument because it is composed
only of those people who have common interests, a common perception or a shared
culture; or those who belong to the same region or share the same belief. They form a
party to achieve their ends, impose their will, or extend the dominion of their beliefs,
values, and interests to the society as a whole. A party's aim is to achieve power under the
pretext of carrying out its program. Democratically, none of these parties should govern a
whole people who constitute a diversity of interests, ideas, temperaments, regions and
beliefs. The party is a dictatorial instrument of government that enables those with
common outlooks or interests to rule the people as a whole. Within the community, the
party represents a minority.
The purpose of forming a party is to create an instrument to rule the people, i.e., to rule
over non-members of the party. The party is, fundamentally, based on an arbitrary
authoritarian concept - the domination of the members of the party over the rest of the
people. The party presupposes that its accession to power is the way to attain its ends,
and assumes that its objectives are also those of the people. This is the theory justifying
party dictatorship, and is the basis of any dictatorship. No matter how many parties exist,
the theory remains valid.
The existence of many parties intensifies the struggle for power, and this results in the
neglect of any achievements for the people and of any socially beneficial plans. Such
actions are presented as a justification to undermine the position of the ruling party so
that an opposing party can replace it. The parties very seldom resort to arms in their
struggle but, rather, denounce and denigrate the actions of each other. This is a battle
which is inevitably waged at the expense of the higher, vital interests of the society. Some,
if not all, of those higher interests will fall prey to the struggle for power between
instruments of government, for the destruction of those interests supports the opposition
in their argument against the ruling party or parties. In order to rule, the opposition party
has to defeat the existing instrument of government.
To do so, the opposition must minimize the government's achievements and cast doubt on
its plans, even though those plans may be beneficial to the society. Consequently, the
interests and programs of the society become the victims of the parties' struggle for
power. Such struggle is, therefore, politically, socially, and economically destructive to the
society, despite the fact that it creates political activity.
4
Thus, the struggle results in the victory of another instrument of government; the fall of
one party, and the rise of another. It is, in fact, a defeat for the people, i.e., a defeat for
democracy. Furthermore, parties can be bribed and corrupted either from inside or
outside.
Originally, the party is formed ostensibly to represent the people. Subsequently, the party
leadership becomes representative of the membership, and the leader represents the party
elite. It becomes clear that this partisan game is a deceitful farce based on a false form of
democracy. It has a selfish authoritarian character based on maneuvres, intrigues and
political games. This confirms the fact that the party system is a modern instrument of
dictatorship. The party system is an outright, unconvincing dictatorship, one which the
world has not yet surpassed. It is, in fact, the dictatorship of the modern age.
The parliament of the winning party is indeed a parliament of the party, for the executive
power formed by this parliament is the power of the party over the people. Party power,
which is supposedly for the good of the whole people, is actually the arch-enemy of a
fraction of the people, namely, the opposition party or parties and their supporters. The
opposition is, therefore, not a popular check on the ruling party but, rather, is itself
opportunistically seeking to replace the ruling party. According to modern democracy, the
legitimate check on the ruling party is the parliament, the majority of whose members are
from that ruling party. That is to say, control is in the hands of the ruling party, and power
is in the hands of the controlling party. Thus the deception, falseness and invalidity of the
political theories dominant in the world today become obvious. From these emerge
contemporary conventional democracy.
"The party represents a segment of the people, but the sovereignty of the people is
indivisible."
"The party allegedly governs on behalf of the people, but in reality the true principle of
democracy is based upon the notion that there can be no representation in lieu of the
people."
The party system is the modern equivalent of the tribal or sectarian system. A society
governed by one party is similar to one which is governed by one tribe or one sect. The
party, as shown, represents the perception of a certain group of people, or the interests of
one group in society, or one belief, or one region. Such a party is a minority compared
with the whole people, just as the tribe and the sect are. The minority has narrow, common
sectarian interests and beliefs, from which a common outlook is formed. Only the bloodrelationship
distinguishes a tribe from a party, and, indeed, a tribe might also be the basis
for the foundation of a party. There is no difference between party struggle and tribal or
sectarian struggles for power. Just as tribal and sectarian rule is politically unacceptable
and inappropriate, likewise the rule under a party system. Both follow the same path and
lead to the same end. The negative and destructive effects of the tribal or sectarian
struggle on society is identical to the negative and destructive effects of the party
struggle.
CLASS
The political class system is the same as a party, tribal, or sectarian system since a class
dominates society in the same way that a party, tribe or sect would. Classes, like parties,
sects or tribes, are groups of people within society who share common interests. Common
interests arise from the existence of a group of people bound together by bloodrelationship,
belief, culture, locality or standard of living. Classes, parties, sects and tribes
emerge because blood-relationship, social rank, economic interest, standard of living,
5
belief, culture and locality create a common outlook to achieve a common end. Thus,
social structures, in the form of classes, parties, tribes or sects, emerge. These eventually
develop into political entities directed toward the realization of the goals of that group. In
all cases, the people are neither the class, the party, the tribe, nor the sect, for these are
no more than a segment of the people and constitute a minority. If a class, a party, a tribe,
or a sect dominates a society, then the dominant system becomes a dictatorship.
However, a class or a tribal coalition is preferable to a party coalition since societies
originally consisted of tribal communities. One seldom finds a group of people who do not
belong to a tribe, and all people belong to a specific class. But no party or parties embrace
all of the people, and therefore the party or party coalition represents a minority compared
to the masses outside their membership. Under genuine democracy, there can be no
justification for any one class to subdue other classes for its interests. Similarly, no party,
tribe or sect can crush others for their own interests.
To allow such actions abandons the logic of democracy and justifies resort to the use of
force. Such policies of suppression are dictatorial because they are not in the interest of
the whole society, which consists of more than one class, tribe or sect, or the members of
one party. There is no justification for such actions, though the dictatorial argument is that
society actually consists of numerous segments, one of which must undertake the
liquidation of others in order to remain solely in power. This exercise is not, accordingly,
in the interests of the whole society but, rather, in the interests of a specific class, tribe,
sect, party, or those who claim to speak for the society. Such an act is basically aimed at
the member of the society who does not belong to the party, class, tribe or sect which
carries out the liquidation.
A society torn apart by party feud is similar to one which is torn apart by tribal or sectarian
conflicts.
A party that is formed in the name of a class inevitably becomes a substitute for that class
and continues in the process of spontaneous transformation until it becomes hostile to
the class that it replaces.
Any class which inherits a society also inherits its characteristics. If the working class, for
example, subdues all other classes of a particular society, it then becomes its only heir
and forms its material and social base. The heir acquires the traits of those from whom it
inherits, though this may not be evident all at once. With the passage of time,
characteristics of the other eliminated classes will emerge within the ranks of the working
class itself. The members of the new society will assume the attitudes and perspectives
appropriate to their newly evolved characteristics. Thus, the working class will develop a
separate society possessing all of the contradictions of the old society. In the first stage,
the material standard and importance of the members become unequal. Thereafter, groups
emerge which automatically become classes that are the same as the classes that were
eliminated. Thus, the struggle for domination of the society begins again. Each group of
people, each faction, and each new class will all vie to become the instrument of
government.
Being social in nature, the material base of any society is changeable. The instrument of
government of this material base may be sustained for some time, but it will eventual
become obsolete as new material and social standards evolve to form a new material
base. Any society which undergoes a class conflict may at one time have been a one-class
society but, through evolution, inevitably becomes a multi-class society.
The class that expropriates and acquires the possession of others to maintain power for
itself will soon find that, through evolution, it will be itself subject to change as though it
were the society as a whole.

Intuition tells me it's time to "peek in" on this thread...



http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=15878

Oh and this one too:

http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=9368&highlight=orthodoxymoron&page=8

The book of GAIA dream



GAIA dream is

GAIA dream is.
GAIA dream exists.
I am GAIA dream in motion.

GAIA dream is the unique dream of Earth

GAIA dream is the unique dream of the Earth.
The unique dream of the Earth is GAIA dream.
GAIA dream is the unique existence of Earth

GAIA Dream IS a matter of degree

GAIA Dream IS a matter of degree.
Matter of degree IS GAIA Dream.
GAIA Dream is argument of perception.
The dreamer and the dream.
The real and the unreal.
Within the dream looking out.
Outside the dream looking in.
The dream within a dream within.

GAIA Dream IS Life

GAIA Dream IS Life.
Life IS GAIA Dream.
Within the GAIA dream, everything that happens is real.

GAIA Dream IS Your dream

GAIA Dream IS Your dream.
Your dream IS GAIA Dream.
You are a dreamer.
You are the dreamer.
You are within the dream.
You are the dream within.

http://the-logos.org/content/05_07_gaia_dream.html

218a Doorway to Aquarius

...

...

...

Fascinating Thread

http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=20379

When "The Gods" are still fighting about who is right and focusing more on "who is wrong".. well.. nuff said.

Nanu Nanu




Giving God a Candee..

This is a good reason to believe in one god. Hence, no fights.

you sure have been blessed
with beautiful children ~thanks for sharing

Aquaries1111 wrote:Dr. Greer discusses the following topics:

The highly secretive and ruthless group (MJ-12, Majestic, Cosmic-Ops, PI-40) that is behind the UFO cover-up.

The 'Norway Spiral'.

The Orion Project's efforts working with breakthrough technology that would eliminate the need for fossil fuel based technologies.

The reason behind the ruthless secrecy of the Extraterrestrial and UFO subjects.

Dr. Greer's personal story including his experiences with Extraterrestrials.

The mind-set of the ruthless group known as Majestic-12 (MJ-12, Majestic, Cosmic-Ops, PI-40).

So-called "Gray" aliens are in fact man-made PLFs (Programmed Life Forms).

So-called 'alien implants' are man-made devices.

The reason why there is fear mongering of the Extraterrestrial subject.

So-called 'alien abductions' are in fact carried out by covert human groups.

The massive amount of disinformation on the Extraterrestrial subject. This disinformation has infected the UFO subculture.

Dr. Greer has held the body of an 18 inch sized Extraterrestrial.

The connection between consciousness and the Extraterrestrial subject.

The logical fallacy of the so-called ET "threat" argument.

Scalar weapon systems (Directed Energy Weapons, Electromagnetic Weapons) that orbit Earth and target Extraterrestrial vehicles.

CSETI (not to be confused with SETI) experiences with Extraterrestrials.

The limitations of space and time as we currently understand them - how this relates to Extraterrestrials.

The covert plan by the highly secretive and ruthless group (MJ-12, Majestic, Cosmic-Ops, PI-40) to stage an alien "attack" on Earth.

The stupidity of the so-called alien "hybrid" theory pushed by certain individuals in the UFO subculture.

Thanks for the summary Deborah.

Frank O'Collins does a talkshoe every Wednesday.. Just under 6 hours before his next one if anyone is interested in listening in or asking questions via skype chat or calling in.. No sign up required..

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=90342&pageNumber=0&pageSize=15

Aquaries1111 wrote:Frank O'Collins does a talkshoe every Wednesday.. Just under 6 hours before his next one if anyone is interested in listening in or asking questions via skype chat or calling in.. No sign up required..

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=90342&pageNumber=0&pageSize=15

I asked him a question last week on OBE's and he referred me to Cognitive Law and Ecclesiastical Law.. All is covered in the Canons. gosoL Go