tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

+2
Sanicle
shiloh
6 posters

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Sun Dec 06, 2015 2:45 am

    NY Times: “Non-Muslim extremists” more lethal than jihadis

    December 5, 2015 9:02 am By Robert Spencer 139 Comments


    This graph appears in the New York Times story “What Investigators Know About the San Bernardino Shooting,” December 4, 2015:


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Muslim-vs-non-muslim-extremist-deaths-png


    The entire purpose of this graph, and of the survey it illustrates, is to downplay the Islamic jihad threat. For some unknown reason, the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media have made one of their chief aims the exoneration of Islam. Their goal is that, even as the jihadi death toll mounts, no one has a negative view of The Religion of Peace.

    This graph is ridiculous for five reasons:


    • 1. It begins after 9/11. Including nearly 3,000 jihad deaths on 9/11 would make it look significantly different.
    • 2. It does not include foiled plots, which also would make the jihadi line dwarf the non-jihadi line.
    • 3. It does not include the global component of the problem. There is a global jihad. Jihadis have murdered people all over the world. There is no global “right-wing extremist,” “white male Christian” threat.
    • 4. It ignores the fact that a minuscule part of the U.S. population — Muslims — is responsible for around half of the successful attacks.
    • 5. It lumps together shootings by clearly deranged people such as James Holmes with those of other deranged people who seem to have some ideology, such as Adam Lanza, to create the impression that there is some ideological movement and threat equivalent to that of Islamic jihad.


    The mainstream media is no longer in any sense a news source. It is a propaganda arm for those who want you to think Islam is wonderful.

    Several days ago I was contacted by NPR for a show hosted by Warren Olney and also joined by Peter Bergen and Frank Rich, on “the San Bernardino mass shooting and the impact on Americans who according to the latest Quinnipiac poll feel that homegrown terrorists are America’s biggest threat. Will this increase gun sales and anti Muslim sentiment?”

    I was extremely surprised to be asked, since usually only one point of view is allowed on NPR. The producer called me to talk over the issue and I soon realized that she wanted me to be the foil on the show, the ranting right-winger countered by cool and knowledgeable leftists.

    I explained to her why “Islamophobia” was a propaganda concept and why concern about the refugees was not racism and xenophobia.
    She seemed surprised that I wasn’t a ranting, frothing-at-the-mouth bigot, and I in turn wasn’t at all surprised when I got the email saying they didn’t want me on the show after all, as they had “decided to go in a different direction.”

    Reasonable arguments for resisting jihad and opposing a massive influx of Muslim refugees are not allowed on NPR, or anywhere else in the mainstream media.

    Islamic State jihad suicide bombers murder 27 on island in Lake Chad
    SB jihad murderer pledged allegiance


    Toby says
    December 5, 2015 at 7:48 pm

    Whoever created this graph is an absolute fool. Even after the obvious attempts to distort the figures such as ignoring 9/11 and lumping all non-muslim attacks into a single bucket there is only 1 logical conclusion to draw from the data: 1% of the population has murdered the same number of people as the remaining 99%.
    The fool puffs out his chest showing how tolerant and diverse he is, not realising that he has just demonstrated how dangerous Muslims are in the community.

    If a single breed of dog that made up 1% of dogs in the US was responsible for half the attacks on people it would rightly be declared a dangerous breed.

    If a brand of car that made up 1% of cars on US roads was responsible for half the car crash deaths the NYT would be screaming for it to be banned and for the car company executives to be charged.
    When 1% of the population commits half the attacks it’s somehow proof that they are good people just like us. It would be funny if it wasn’t so serious.







    March 5, 2012
    Andrew Breitbart for the Offense

    By Robert Spencer

    Among the many things that made Andrew Breitbart a great man was that he played offense. Most of the time warriors for freedom find themselves playing defense. Instead, we should follow Breitbart's example.

    So many, many times I have been speaking at anti-jihad events and heard other speakers saying, "We are not racists, we are not bigots, we are not Islamophobes..." This is an understandable impulse: to counter the leftist/Islamic supremacist charges that smear and defame decent people who are trying to defend their freedoms and way of life. But at the same, it is playing on their field, allowing the foes of freedom to set the terms of the debate. Breitbart never did that.
    We have allowed the jihadists and Islamic supremacists, and their leftist allies, to put us on the defensive. We're always apologizing, tacitly accepting their narrative and responding to them in the parameters they set up. Even worse, many even among the anti-jihadists eagerly throw their colleagues under the bus -- those colleagues whom the left and the Islamic supremacists have started to zero in on. They're the ones we should be standing up for the most resolutely, for they are drawing fire because they are effective.

    Instead of bowing and scraping to the Islamic supremacists and feebly protesting that we're not really racists and hatemongers and all the other calumnies and canards they throw at us, we should be taking the fight to them, and standing up and saying, "You are fronting for the most oppressive ideology on the face of the earth. You are fronting for evil. You are carrying water and running interference for the denial of free speech, the denial of the freedom of conscience, the institutionalized oppression of women, the subjugation of non-Muslims, and worse. You're fronting for stonings, amputations, the murder of apostates, the treatment of women as possessions of men, the madness and senseless violence that we see in this furor over the Quran-burnings, and more. You shout us down on campuses and do everything you can to make sure we are not heard in the public square. And you call us fascists? You are the quintessence of fascism."
    And we should note that even their charges against us are a mere diversionary tactic, designed to frighten people of goodwill away from our message and to divert attention away from the reality of jihad and Islamic supremacism. And that they demonstrate the bankruptcy of their position by heaping abuse on us instead of answering our arguments, which in fact they cannot answer.

    Andrew Breitbart was never defensive. He called the left out for its hypocrisy, its thuggery, its totalitarian impulses, its self-contradictions and inconsistency, its naked hatred. That's why they hated and feared him so.
    We should be hated and feared by the enemies of freedom. We should never bow to them, never apologize to them, never play the game they want us to play. Their hate is a badge of honor. Their fury and abuse are signs of our effectiveness. The people on the right whom the left love most are those who gore their oxen the least. These soft conservatives don't dare upset politically correct pieties. They wouldn't dream of challenging our government and law enforcement officials to stop peddling soothing falsehoods about the global jihad and Islamic supremacism, or of calling the Muslim community in the U.S. to account for the 80% of mosques that teach jihad and hatred of infidels, and for the Muslim Brotherhood ties of major Islamic groups in this country. Instead, they peddle the same false narrative, spending their time retailing crowd-pleasing fictions about the vast majority of moderate Muslims who are proudly American and accept constitutional freedoms, and whose vocal and vociferous and active support for anti-terror measures is no doubt right around the corner.

    This is a false hope. Ten years after 9/11, and we are still waiting for this large cadre of moderate Muslims to begin fighting against their violent and supremacist coreligionists. And twenty years after 9/11, we will still be waiting.
    It is time to give up false hopes and stop playing defense against the Islamic supremacists and the left. That is Andrew Breitbart's lesson, and his legacy. May we all emulate him, and may his memory be eternal.

    Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and the author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad.


    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/03/andrew_breitbart_for_the_offense.html#ixzz3tWiJ1dqE
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Sun Dec 06, 2015 3:04 am

    Machete-wielding Muslim slashes man’s throat in London tube station


    December 5, 2015 6:11 pm By Robert Spencer 64 Comments

     

    We shall see once again in the coverage of this incident that the one thing the UK government and media will want you to know about it is that it has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam, and that Muslims in the UK fear an “Islamophobic” backlash.

    “BREAKING: Machete ‘Syria revenge’ stabbing in London now treated as TERROR attack,” by Alix Culbertson, Express, December 5, 2015:


    A man was stabbed in the ticket hall at Leytonstone station this evening by another man who witnesses say shouted “This is for Syria” as he slashed his throat.
    Another three are thought to have been injured.
    The Met Police said its counter-terrorism command unit is now investigating the incident.

    Police said they used a taser on the suspect as he threatened others with a knife, before they managed to arrest him.
    The victim was rushed to hospital in a serious condition with multiple stab wounds, paramedics said.
    Frightened witnesses described how their normal Saturday night-out turned into a horror show.

    One said the victim was an “elderly” man with a younger female family member while another said the man had a long knife, which looked like a machete.
    A video taken by another witness shows a big pool of blood just outside the ticket barrier as police confront the attacker, then taser him before putting handcuffs on him and arresting him.
    One witness, who did not want to be named, said: “So as I was going to Leytonstone station was dressed to go to Christmas dinner with people from work.
    “As I walked down I just saw a lot of people running but I ignored it and kept walking to get my train, but suddenly what I saw I couldn’t believe my eyes and what I saw was I guy with a knife and a dead guy on the floor.
    “I was so scared I ran for my life. After good 10-15 police came and got the guy and arrested him.

    “And as he was coming out this is what he said “This is what happens when you f*** with mother Syria all of your blood will be spilled”.”

    Evitri Payet said fellow witnesses were shouting at the suspect: “You’re not Muslim.” …


    Yes, he ceased being Muslim the moment he did something that made Islam look bad.



    SB jihadi to Christian coworker: "Christians and Jews deserve to die"
    Islamic State jihad suicide bombers murder 27 on island in Lake Chad

    http://www.smh.com.au/world/man-seriously-injured-in-stabbing-at-londons-leytonstone-tube-station-20151205-glghle.html


    SB jihadi to Christian coworker: “Christians and Jews deserve to die”

    December 5, 2015 7:29 pm By Robert Spencer




    Farook also threatened Nicholas Thalasinos, whom he eventually murdered. A friend of the victim recounted:


    The islamic terrorist who took the Life of my friend & bro in Christ, Nicholas Thalasinos, on yesterday in San Bernadino, CA, had been threatening him, telling him that islam will rule the world, Christians and Jews deserve to die; and that he (Nicholas) was going to die.
    But, they aren’t reporting that in the “news” …
    I wonder why …


    Did Thalasinos report these threats to police? If so, what did they do — ascribe Thalasinos’ concerns to “Islamophobia”? Or did he not report them, and if not, did he fear charges of “racism”?

    Farook told a Jewish coworker: “You will never see Israel.”


    Thanks to Pamela Geller for the video and all links.

    Islamocritical ex-Congressman to Atty General: "Prosecute me. I dare you."
    Machete-wielding Muslim slashes man's throat in London tube station
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Sun Dec 06, 2015 9:36 pm

    NY Daily News’ Linda Stasi justifies SB jihad murders, says victim was “male equivalent of Pamela Geller”
    December 6, 2015 12:39 pm By Robert Spencer

    The mainstream media has for years been in the business of justifying jihad terror and demonizing those who oppose it, but this piece reaches an appalling new low. Linda Stasi here portrays jihad murderer Syed Rizwan Farook and his victim Nicholas Thalasinos as two sides of the same coin: “Make no mistake, as disgusting and deservedly dead as the hate-filled fanatical Muslim killers were, Thalasinos was also a hate-filled bigot.”
    Her equivalence founders, of course, on the simple and titanic fact that Farook was a mass murderer, while Thalasinos was never going to kill anyone. But in her madness to justify the San Bernardino jihad murders, Stasi doesn’t bother to mention that.

    “One man, the Muslim, was a loser who had to travel all the way to Pakistan to get himself an email bride. (I refuse to add to their fame by using the killer and his murderous wife’s names.)” But she doesn’t hesitate to defecate on the memory of the man Farook murdered, Nicholas Thalasinos. And Thalasinos isn’t the only one Stasi defames: “The killer, however, became half of an Islamic Bonnie & Clyde, while the other died as the male equivalent of Pamela Geller.”
    Why does Stasi believe that Pamela Geller is a hate-filled bigot, the equivalent of Syed Rizwan Farook? Because she has put her life on the line calling attention to and opposing the Islamic hatred and bloodlust that leads to the San Bernardino jihad murders and other jihad mass murders. If Pamela Geller’s warnings had been heeded, Nicholas Thalasinos and the other San Bernardino victims might be alive today. But they were not heeded, because of the relentless demonization that has been carried out for years against her, and continues to be, by people like Linda Stasi and her accomplices in the mainstream media.

    By spitting on the dead and the one person leading the resistance to jihad terror, Linda Stasi is only perpetuating the environment that enabled the San Bernardino jihad attack to happen. The next time there is a jihad mass murder on American soil, Linda Stasi should stand up and take a bow — and if there is a “right-winger” among the dead, she can run another victory lap like this one.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Linda-Stasi
    What a vile human being
    “Stasi: San Bernardino killers were radical, ISIS-loving monsters — but one of their victims was just as bigoted,” by Linda Stasi, New York Daily News, December 5, 2015:


    They were two hate-filled, bigoted municipal employees interacting in one department. Now 13 innocent people are dead in unspeakable carnage.
    One man spent his free time writing frightening, NRA-loving, hate-filled screeds on Facebook about the other’s religion.
    The other man quietly stewed and brewed his bigotry, collecting the kind of arsenal that the Facebook poster would have envied.
    What they didn’t realize is that except for their different religions they were in many ways similar men who even had the same job.
    One man, the Muslim, was a loser who had to travel all the way to Pakistan to get himself an email bride. (I refuse to add to their fame by using the killer and his murderous wife’s names.)
    That wife radicalized him and fueled his hatred. The FBI is investigating her ties to Al Qaeda and ISIS. Go to the Middle East, meet your new wife, meet some terror leaders, begin your wedded bliss back in the USA.
    The other man, the victim, Nicholas Thalasinos, was a radical Born Again Christian/Messianic Jew, who also connected with his future wife online and had traveled across the country to meet her.
    The killer, however, became half of an Islamic Bonnie & Clyde, while the other died as the male equivalent of Pamela Geller.
    The killers deserve every disgusting adjective thrown at them. And more.
    But the victim is also inaccurately being eulogized as a kind and loving religious man.
    Make no mistake, as disgusting and deservedly dead as the hate-filled fanatical Muslim killers were, Thalasinos was also a hate-filled bigot. Death can’t change that. But in the U.S., we don’t die for speaking our minds. Or we’re not supposed to anyway.
    Thalasinos was an anti-government, anti-Islam, pro-NRA, rabidly anti-Planned Parenthood kinda guy, who posted that it would be “Freaking Awesome” if hateful Ann Coulter was named head of Homeland Security.
    He asked, “IS
    1. EVERY POLITICIAN IS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR?
    2. EVERY POLITICIAN IS A MORON?
    3. EVERY POLITICIAN IS RACIST AGAINST JEWS?” He also posted screeds like, “You can stick your Muslim Million Man march up your asses,” and how “Hashem” should blow up Iran.


    His Facebook page warns that “Without HEALTHY PREGNANT WOMAN (Democrats) would have NO SOURCE of BABIES to SACRIFICE and SELL!”
    We have freedom of speech but even so, a city worker should refrain from such public bigotry. Municipal workers have been fired for spewing and posting racial and sexual slurs.
    On the other side, the killer and his Jihad-loving Pakistani wife were keeping their hatred quiet, while legally assembling an arsenal of assault weapons, 7,000 rounds of ammo, and illegally making 15 pipe bombs under their neighbors’ noses.
    Whatever spurred the carnage, the end result was the murder and maiming of innocent people enjoying a holiday party.
    Keeping an arsenal is a protected right, but using the term, “Christmas” party? Now that could be trouble.



    Robert Spencer in Italy's Libero: "Occidente remissivo fino al suicidio"
    Hamas-linked CAIR official giving active shooter training in Florida mosques

    gravenimage says
    December 6, 2015 at 6:21 pm
    NY Daily News’ Linda Stasi justifies SB jihad murders, says victim was “male equivalent of Pamela Geller”
    ………………………………
    Even by the standards of the MSM, this is *utterly appalling*.
    It also implies that Pamela Geller deserves to be murdered–even though she has never advocated violence, any more than did these Jihad’s victim Nicholas Thalasinos. This is not just morally repulsive, it is also highly irresponsible.
    It also does not explain, if Thalasinos was supposedly the only intended victim, that these mass murderers managed to slaughter thirteen other people, while wounding many more. Why would they dress as commandos, arm themselves with automatic weapons, and have a home full of IEDs if they just intended to kill one unarmed “hate-filled bigot”?
    This is simply grotesque, and more of a red herring than the meme that this was just about poor gun control–something else the MSM is flogging right now. But more to the point, it is many times more sickening. This man had hurt no one–and now Stasi is blaming him for his own murder–and by implication the murder of his friends and coworkers.

    Here are all the victims who were murdered:
    http://abc7.com/news/all-fatal-san-bernardino-shooting-victims-identified/1108285/

    Note that among the victims is an Iranian Christian, Bennetta Bet-Badal, who fled Iran after the Islamic revolution there to escape the persecution of Christians at the hands of devout Mohammedans. That she was then murdered by ravening Muslim Jihadists in the place she fled to for sanctuary is especially appalling.
    Please note there is a link in the article where you can donate to her children through a GoFundMe account. There is another account for another of the victim’s children, as well.

    More:
    The mainstream media has for years been in the business of justifying jihad terror and demonizing those who oppose it, but this piece reaches an appalling new low. Linda Stasi here portrays jihad murderer Syed Rizwan Farook and his victim Nicholas Thalasinos as two sides of the same coin: “Make no mistake, as disgusting and deservedly dead as the hate-filled fanatical Muslim killers were, Thalasinos was also a hate-filled bigot.”
    Her equivalence founders, of course, on the simple and titanic fact that Farook was a mass murderer, while Thalasinos was never going to kill anyone. But in her madness to justify the San Bernardino jihad murders, Stasi doesn’t bother to mention that.
    ………………………………
    *Sickening* false moral equivalence.
    She says, “But the victim is also inaccurately being eulogized as a kind and loving religious man”–even though there is no reason to suppose he was anything but. She sneers at his being “a radical Born Again Christian/Messianic Jew”.
    His “crime” was supporting Israel–and for daring to consider the attacks of 9/11 a bad thing.
    The NY Daily News article features a large photo of Thalasinos and his wife on their wedding day–and then goes on to identify *the victim* as the cause of the murders.
    One can only imagine the additional pain this is causing Nicholas’s grieving widow, Jennifer.
    Stasi *has no shame*.
    More:
    “One man, the Muslim, was a loser who had to travel all the way to Pakistan to get himself an email bride. (I refuse to add to their fame by using the killer and his murderous wife’s names.)” But she doesn’t hesitate to defecate on the memory of the man Farook murdered, Nicholas Thalasinos. And Thalasinos isn’t the only one Stasi defames: “The killer, however, became half of an Islamic Bonnie & Clyde, while the other died as the male equivalent of Pamela Geller.”
    ………………………………
    She won’t name the Jihad killers, but is happy to defame Nicholas Talasinos? *Horrifying*.
    Also, referring to Farook as a “loser” who couldn’t find any woman to marry him her is ridiculous. He was a reasonably good looking man, and he made $71,000 a year and had a skilled job with good security.

    The reason he went to Dar-al-Islam was not to find a nice girl, but to find a dedicated Muslimah who would wage violent Jihad with him.
    More:
    Why does Stasi believe that Pamela Geller is a hate-filled bigot, the equivalent of Syed Rizwan Farook? Because she has put her life on the line calling attention to and opposing the Islamic hatred and bloodlust that leads to the San Bernardino jihad murders and other jihad mass murders. If Pamela Geller’s warnings had been heeded, Nicholas Thalasinos and the other San Bernardino victims might be alive today. But they were not heeded, because of the relentless demonization that has been carried out for years against her, and continues to be, by people like Linda Stasi and her accomplices in the mainstream media.
    ………………………………
    Yes–it is not just that Pamela Geller is ‘not as bad’ as Farook and his homicidal bride–it is that she is a heroine who stands against the evil ideology that perpetrated this horrifying Jihad mass murder.
    That makes this calumny all the more repellent.

    More:
    By spitting on the dead and the one person leading the resistance to jihad terror, Linda Stasi is only perpetuating the environment that enabled the San Bernardino jihad attack to happen. The next time there is a jihad mass murder on American soil, Linda Stasi should stand up and take a bow — and if there is a “right-winger” among the dead, she can run another victory lap like this one.
    What a vile human being
    ………………………………
    Indeed so.
    And she spends more time endlessly defaming the victim on her Twitter feed:
    https://twitter.com/lindastasi?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor



    Pamela Geller: If Loretta Lynch Wants to Ban ‘Violent Talk,’ She Should Ban the Quran

    December 6, 2015 2:40 pm By Robert Spencer 39 Comments
    Plain and simple truths that few people dare acknowledge (and none of those few are in the Washington establishment).

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Quran-and-gun

    “Pamela Geller: If Loretta Lynch Wants to Ban ‘Violent Talk,’ She Should Ban the Quran,” by Pamela Geller, Breitbart, December 5, 2015:

    In the wake of the San Bernardino jihad slaughter, Obama’s jihad denial took a malevolent and tyrannical turn. The day after a horrific ISIS rampage, Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, pledged to an Islamic supremacist lobbying group that she would prosecute anyone who used “anti-Muslim” rhetoric.
    Lynch declared: “When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted. My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.”

    If Lynch is serious in prosecuting hate speech, then she will have to start closing down mosques and banning the Quran. She wants to restrict the First Amendment so as to curb “actions predicated on violent talk?” Then she should ban this “violent talk”:


    And slay them wherever you come upon them, and expel them from where they expelled you; persecution is more grievous than slaying. But fight them not by the Holy Mosque until they should fight you there; then, if they fight you, slay them — such is the recompense of unbelievers, but if they give over, surely Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate. Fight them, till there is no persecution and the religion is Allah’s; then if they give over, there shall be no enmity save for evildoers. (Quran 2:191-193)

    Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that Allah has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for Allah’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them. (Quran 4:34)

    They wish that you should disbelieve as they disbelieve, and then you would be equal; therefore take not to yourselves friends of them, until they emigrate in the way of Allah; then, if they turn their backs, take them, and slay them wherever you find them; take not to yourselves any one of them as friend or helper. (Quran 4:89)

    This is the recompense of those who fight against Allah and His Messenger, and hasten about the earth, to do corruption there: they shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or their hands and feet shall alternately be struck off; or they shall be banished from the land. That is a degradation for them in this world; and in the world to come awaits them a mighty chastisement. (Quran 5:33)

    When thy Lord was revealing to the angels, ˜I am with you; so confirm the believers. I shall cast into the unbelievers’ hearts terror; so smite above the necks, and smite every finger of them! (Quran 8:12)

    Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you can, to strike terror in the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides them that you know not; Allah knows them. And whatsoever you expend in the way of Allah shall be repaid you in full; you will not be wronged. (Quran 8:60)

    Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay the alms, then let them go their way; Allah is All-forgiving, All-compassionate. (Quran 9:5)

    Fight those who believe not in Allah and the Last Day and do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled. (Quran 9:29)

    Allah has bought from the believers their selves and their possessions against the gift of Paradise; they fight in the way of Allah; they kill, and are killed; that is a promise binding upon Allah in the Torah, and the Gospel, and the Koran; and who fulfils his covenant truer than Allah? So rejoice in the bargain you have made with Him; that is the mighty triumph. (Quran 9:111)

    O believers, fight the unbelievers who are near to you; and let them find in you a harshness; and know that Allah is with the godfearing. (Quran 9:123)

    When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks, then, when you have made wide slaughter among them, tie fast the bonds; then set them free, either by grace or ransom, till the war lays down its loads. So it shall be; and if Allah had willed, He would have avenged Himself upon them; but that He may try some of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He will not send their works astray. (Quran 47:4)


    When Lynch made her revolting statement, the bodies were still warm in San Bernardino. Eyewitnesses inside the conference room at the center described the scene as “surreal”: “It was unspeakable the carnage that we were seeing….There were victims who were clearly, obviously deceased outside of the conference room. To be honest, it was a little surreal. You train for it and you know your job is dealing in reality…but I did the job I was supposed to do –- go in there.” The eyewitness recalled that the faces of the survivors showed “pure panic.”

    Yet when she spoke to the 10th Anniversary Dinner of Muslim Advocates, the group that got the Obama administration to scrub all counter-terror training materials of any mention of jihad and Islam, Lynch said that her “greatest fear” was the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in America.

    After jihad attacks in Garland, Chattanooga, Boston, Fort Hood, the University of California Merced, and now San Bernardino, that’s the take-away. Jihad slaughter is Obama’s clarion call to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law). Lynch said: “The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence.” Lynch has also called on Muslim parents to contact her if their children are bullied in school – that’s just grooming more Clockmeds.

    Loretta Lynch said that the San Bernardino jihad attack gave her a “wonderful opportunity.” She said, “We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change.”

    “A wonderful opportunity?” To impose the sharia.



    Muslim bangs on cockpit door, threatens to down plane, "wanted to see Allah"
    Robert Spencer in Italy's Libero: "Occidente remissivo fino al suicidio
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Mon Dec 07, 2015 10:55 pm

    When the true 'evil' hits home, some of the sleeping ones awake!

    French press sees parties in meltdown after FN victory


    • 7 December 2015
    • From the section Europe



    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam _87073034_7dec_lib_fig_comp
    Image copyright BBC Monitoring - Image caption
    Le Figaro's headline expresses 'shock' at the result of the poll

    The French press sees the apparent victory of the far-right National Front (FN) in the first round of regional elections as a disaster for the traditional parties, both left and centre-right.
    Centre-right daily Le Figaro says that the result represents a "bitter failure" for both left and right, but is one that they should have seen coming.
    Editor-in-chief Alexis Brezet says that the wave of public anger that has put an election victory within the FN's grasp has been spurred on by "thirty years of public powerlessness and government failures" and that a vote for the FN is simply "the most spectacular expression" of this anger.
    Mr Brezet says that all France's leaders since Francois Mitterrand have contributed to this gathering wave of anger, but that "it is Francoise Hollande to whom posterity will accord the sad privilege of having made it explode".
    "Now indisputably the first party of France, the FN has noisily established itself at the heart of our political landscape. For both left and right, it is a bitter failure. For France, it is a leap into the unknown, whose political consequences, whatever the ultimate gains for the FN in the regions, will have an impact well beyond the second round."




    "Slap in the face"

    Centre-left daily Le Monde sees the result as being also a slap in the face for Nicolas Sarkozy, the leader of the centre-right Republicans party, which appears to be in second place ahead of the governing Socialist Party of Mr Hollande.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam _87073031_7dec_sarkozy_epa
    Image copyright EPA - Image caption
    Former President Nicolas Sarkozy (C) leads the centre-right Republicans

    Political commentator Alexandre Lemarie says that "the scenario so dreaded by the chairman of the Republican party has actually happened: his party has been overtaken by the Front National in the first round of the regional elections".
    He adds that the FN has capitalised on the 13 November terror attacks in Paris, which allowed it "to siphon off part of the Republicans' traditional electorate", and that Mr Sarkozy showed himself unable to head off this danger.
    "Despite his warnings against the 'dangerous disorders' that would be triggered by the FN victories, the former head of state failed to mobilise voters beyond his own camp."



    "No. 1 danger"

    Writing in left-leaning La Liberation, Dominique Albertini sees the FN as "the No.1 danger for France", but clings to the hope that its first-round triumph will not necessarily be repeated in the second round.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam _87075196_7dec_marion_lepen_ap
    Image copyright AP - Image caption
    Marion Marechal-Le Pen, niece of FN leader Marine Le Pen, won over 40% of the vote in Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur

    "For the Front, the hardest part is yet to come," he says, pointing out that in the past, the party has often done well in the first round but stumbled in the second.
    "With a turnout that is already higher than the one it had in 2010, especially in areas where it enjoys strong support, it will have to prove that it has not already peaked in the first round."



    "Chilling" result

    In northern France, the region in which Marine Le Pen herself stood and the FN made a particularly strong showing, one local paper, the Courrier picard, says that the result is an "extreme humiliation" for the established parties but hardly a surprise.
    Commentator Mickael Tassart describes the FN's triumph as "chilling" but says it is "a true reflection of the anger of voters in Picardy and the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region."
    "While the national context benefited Francois Hollande as President of the Republic, whose popularity surged in the wave of emotion that followed the [Paris] attacks, it has not benefited François Hollande as the figurehead of a Socialist ship adrift in a raging storm," he adds.


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam _87075195_7dec_picard_ouest_comp
    Image copyright BBC Monitoring - Image caption
     Ouest France's headline notes that 'The West is against the trend'

    In western France - one of the few areas in which the FN still appears to be trailing behind the Socialists and the Republicans - the regional paper Ouest-France still sees the result as delivering a slap in the face for the traditional parties.
    Ouest France's political commentator, Michel Urvoy, notes that the "historic" result has exceeded all expectations, and blames a lack of unity in the Socialist camp for producing yet another election "debacle".
    Urvoy concludes that "until now, we reassured ourselves by saying that as the FN had no allies, it could not win an election. The problem... is that today it no longer necessarily needs allies in order to win."
    BBC Monitoring reports and analyses news from TV, radio, web and print media around the world. You can follow BBC Monitoring on Twitter and Facebook.




    Leftists, Islamic supremacists enraged that media “disrespected” jihad murderer by publishing photo of her face


    December 7, 2015 10:37 am By Robert Spencer 68 Comments

    We have to show “respect” for mass murderers, you see — if they’re Muslims.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Tashfeen-Malik
    “Harris-Perry: New York Times Wrong to Show Malik in Hijab Because It Suggests ‘This is What Terrorism Looks Like,’” by David Rutz, Washington Free Beacon, December 7, 2015:


    The New York Times, despite a front-page editorial advocating for gun control, still failed to live up to the left-wing sensibilities of MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry Saturday because it had a picture of San Bernardino shooter and devout Muslim Tafsheen Malik wearing her hijab.
    Now, Harris-Perry complained in the clip first flagged by NewsBusters, the newspaper was problematic for suggesting “this is what terrorism looks like.”

    Malik pledged allegiance to the Islamic State terrorist organization the same day she and husband Syed Farook killed 14 people. The New York Times reported Malik was “visibly devout” with her use of the hijab and face-covering niqab. It is unclear how any other picture of Malik could have been circulated. As NewsBusters suggested, was the newspaper expected to photoshop the hijab off her?

    Arab-American activist Linda Sarsour claimed Saturday on Harris-Perry’s eponymous show that the media’s rhetoric about the massacre shifted when it turned out the perpetrators were Islamic.
    “All of a sudden we find out they’re Muslim. Bam, gun violence is out of the question,” she said. “We start talking about terrorism. And I’m extremely disturbed. I mean, I looked at the New York Times cover today. There, you have a whole op-ed on gun control. Great. Right next to it is pictures from the apartment of things that I have in my house.”

    “Yes!” Harris-Perry said.
    “These are things that all Muslims have in their house,” Sarsour said. “There’s nothing about that that tells you a story about what terrorism looks like. So you’re telling me that when my friends who are not Muslim come into my home and see a Koran on see frames on the wall with a scripture from my religion, is that supposed to tell you something?…”


    Uh, yeah.
    “Photo of San Bernardino shooter without burqa causes controversy,” by Susana Guerrero, SFGate.com, December 6, 2015:


    Al-Jazeera producer Hashem Said is being criticized after tweeting that ABC News should have respected San Bernardino shooter Tashfeen Malik by not sharing photos of her without a burqa, the Gateway Pundit writes.
    One individual responded to Said’s comment by posting a picture of Malik after she was shot and killed by law enforcers. Malik is shown lying on her back on pavement as one arm covers her face. The individual who posted the photo wrote “Here is a picture of her without her face.”
    Said has since retracted the tweet and apologized for his remark on Twitter. He also issued several tweets clarifying that he didn’t mean to offend anyone by his comment, and he explained that what he meant to say is that the image ABC used could be offensive to Malik’s family.

    ABC News was the first to reveal an image of Malik. Malik typically donned a burka but the image they used reveals her face….

    AFDI’s Geller Fellow Nonie Darwish explains all this: “The Sad Reasons for the Delay in Publishing Photos of Tashfeen Malik,” by Nonie Darwish, PamelaGeller.com, December 6, 2015:

    Most Americans are wondering why the photo of the female Muslim terrorist of the recent San Bernardino attack, Tashfeen Malik, was for several days after the attack withheld without explanation by the authorities. Some guessed that it is for the sake of preserving the integrity of the investigation. That is the only logical explanation to most Americans. But I am afraid there are other reasons that only people with deep knowledge of the Islamic culture understand why Malik’s photo was not immediately published.
    After the San Bernardino massacre by a Muslim married couple who left their new born baby orphaned for the sake of killing Americans, President Obama still refused to call the well-planned slaughter of Americans “terrorism,” let alone “Islamic” terrorism.

    Obama does not even care about appearances when it comes to Islam and protecting Muslim sensitivities. It is not just Americans who are left wondering why Obama appears more concerned about the reputation of Islam than the reputation of America. But many around the world, including Muslims in the Middle East, are wondering about Obama’s loyalties and priorities.
    Like her boss, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, instead of meeting families of the San Bernardino terror victims, met with a group of Muslims in Washington DC. She told them that her “greatest fear” was retaliatory violence against members of the Muslim community. That meant that her priority was to prevent a backlash against Muslims before protecting the American people.
    Having been born and raised in a Muslim culture, I have little doubt that the Muslim leaders Lynch met with asked her not to show the photo of the Muslim female terrorist. Their explanation for keeping the photo away from the public eye was probably because they claimed that showing a photo of a veiled Muslim terrorist who was also a new immigrant would inflame Americans against veiled Muslim women.
    Another reason the Obama administration found good reason to keep the public from seeing her photo initially is because the veiled Muslim female terrorist who killed 14 Americans and injured 21 would have a negative impact on Obama’s plan to bring in hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees to America.

    There is also another reason probably not spoken, and that is that observant Muslims do not like their women’s photos exhibited in public, even if the woman in question is a mass murdering terrorist. The Muslims who met with Lynch still expected Americans to respect their traditions of not showing Muslim women’s photos publicly.
    The Islamic culture is a “pride and shame”-based culture, and Obama fully understands how important it is for Muslims to not be embarrassed. Obama and Lynch’s desire to please their Muslim friends and to prevent a backlash is more important to them than telling Americans the full story of jihad activity. In Obama’s world, Islam must be protected at any cost, even at the cost of keeping the American people uninformed.
    Thousands and even millions of Muslims are not ashamed to openly sympathize with ISIS, but at the same time, they are too proud to accept the consequences of the shame associated with Islamic terrorism. The so-called moderate Muslim leaders who met Lynch were helping, aiding and abetting the Islamic game of eating their cake and having it too. It is a well-known convoluted feature of Islamic cultural logic, to preserve their pride and hide their shame, and Obama is helping them do just that.

    Even though Muslims claim that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism, they still identify with and want to protect the image of a Muslim veiled woman who committed terrorism in the name of the Islamic State. And that is why the photo of the Muslim terrorist, Tashfeen Malik, were too precious to Muslim leaders to be posted on newspapers and TV screens for several days, until the public made it impossible for them to continue to withhold them. It was all about protecting the image of Islam and Muslims: we are told that the female terrorist does not represent Islam and has nothing to do with it.
    The American people need to wake up and smell the jihad, even though their leader is keeping them away from knowing the sad truth.

    AFDI Geller Fellow Nonie Darwish is the author “The Devil We Don’t Know” and president of “Former Muslims United,” a program of the American Freedom Defense Initiative.



    Hugh Fitzgerald: The Mainstream Media's Multifarious Mental Junk
    Howard Dean: "Free speech is good. Respecting others is better"
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:33 pm

    Hugh Fitzgerald: The Mainstream Media’s Multifarious Mental Junk

    December 7, 2015 12:45 pm By Hugh Fitzgerald 36 Comments  

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam San-Bernardino-motive-unkown

    I have been watching, listening to, and reading all the multifarious mental junk that has been on offer on NPR and on CNN and on Fox, and at The Times and The Post and tutti quanti, and witnessing all these sudden scholars of terrorism, ranging from tough-guy ex-FBI agents to left-wing Democrats alike, offering every conceivable variety of obfuscation, misdirection, incomprehension, sheer nonsense — such as placing blame for the San Bernardino jihad terror attack on the “gun lobby.” This is because in this case the Muslim murderers in question used guns, so let’s all concentrate on the instrument used for the mass murder, and pay no attention to the ideology that prompted that particular use of that instrument.

    I have heard repeatedly how what the heavy-lidded couple did “was a political act and had nothing to do with religion”; heard how they were “radicalized” here or there or possibly over there — though what that word “radicalized” would mean, i.e., following faithfully the dictates of Islam, no one seems interested in discussing. I have heard that the FBI has finally bravely concluded that “Yes, it was an act of terrorism,” but beyond that apparently daring declaration, nothing is said about what that “terrorism” was intended to do, or about how it was prompted by what texts of what religion.

    Instead, we hold in our puzzled hands this mush-word “terrorism,” which has become a kind of free-floating Leibnizian monad unconnected to a particular faith Whose Name We Dare Not Speak. Our betters tell us they are still trying to puzzle out the whole mysterious business of that couple that was so mysteriously “radicalized.” They will still be puzzling it out during the next such attack, and the one after that, and the one after that. In the midst of all this, just possibly something like a hemidemisemiquaver of the truth will be allowed in.

    I hate to think, of how today’s NPR and CNN and Fox and The Times and The Post would have covered the propagandists for Fascists and Nazis in the 1920s and 1930s. But this was happening even then. Why, no sooner had Mussolini made his March on Rome, and the Ventennio just started, than a certain Count Constantini was telling the society ladies of Boston about how wonderful that splendid fellow and his wonderful Blackshirts were: “Tells Mussolini’s aims and progress; Count Constantini Speaks at the Chilton Club Italy’s leader Has Won Whole Nation’s Confidence, He Says.” (Boston Daily Globe. Jan 16, 1923, p. 13)

    In contrast to this disinformation to which we are daily subjected, no one should be embarrassed, much less apologetic, for daring to consider the evidence of his senses – that is, the Jihad news that mounts and mounts from all over the world, and especially that which demonstrates the cruel treatment of non-Muslims by Muslims wherever Muslims rule, save in a handful of cases where special circumstances have allowed for a taming or constraining – possibly temporary – of Islam, as in Kazakhstan or Kemalist Turkey. Nor should we be apologetic about becoming aware of the evidence provided in books, rather than from television reports or newspaper dispatches, by the historians of Islamic conquest: that is, the 1350-year history of the conquest of non-Muslim lands and the subsequent subjugation of the autochthonous non-Muslims. And we should be unapologetic about reading the scholars of Islam, such as C. Snouck Hurgronje, Joseph Schacht, Arthur Jeffery, and dozens of others, who wrote before Arab money and influence and other factors aided the Muslim takeover of many academic departments in the West having to do with Islam and related studies. And finally, we can read Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Wafa Sultan, Ibn Warraq, Magdi Allam, Nonie Darwish, and a growing list of other Defectors from the Army of Islam, whose articulate works, whose morally and intellectually advanced temoignages, can be compared with the deceit practiced by Muslim spokesmen who are given such credulous treatment by the formulators of popular opinion.

    The West is now imperiled in a way unique in its history, mostly from an ideological pressure brought from within, and not by military pressure from without. Not everyone thinks we should simply throw up our hands and wail “but what can we do?” and “there’s nothing to be done.” There are those who are not, sometimes out of a mere want of imagination and intellect, able to figure out the many things that they could legitimately and rationally do to preserve (and perhaps even extend) the civilisational legacy they inherited. But there are also those who wish to protect it from its present-day most dangerous enemies, those who have not lost their senses, those who refuse to make burnt offerings of themselves or their children on the Altars of the Idols of the Age, Tolerance and Diversity – a limitless and unintelligent and even suicidal “Tolerance,” a diseased conception of “Diversity.” The latter group must regard with alarm and disgust the irresponsibility of the media coverage that has followed the San Bernardino murders.


    Suspect charged in "anti-Muslim hate crime" touted by Hamas-linked CAIR is named…Mohamed
    Leftists, Islamic supremacists enraged that media "disrespected" jihad murderer by publishing photo of her face


    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Tue Dec 08, 2015 1:07 am

    Op-Ed: Post San Bernardino: How stupid are we supposed to be?


    So they lived the American dream, did they? And the president is keeping us safe, is he?




    Published: Monday, December 07, 2015 10:45 AM

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 515589
    Jack Engelhard
    Jack Engelhard’s classic international bestselling novel Indecent Proposal,...
    ► More from this writer



    A house filled with some 2,000 rounds of ammunition and nobody saw nothin’. Zip.
    The place was crawling with a massive arsenal of weapons that likely filled the garage to the kitchen sink -- but who, me?
    Nothing. Looked pretty normal, say relatives, friends, acquaintances and anybody who visited a house that was stockpiled for mass destruction.
    Even people who lived in and around the house – WHAT? We saw nothing unusual.

    They had to step over and around a mountain of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) to get from the living room to the bathroom, but nobody winced?
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Q_top
    Typical American wifey in a hijab. Most likely clipped coupons to save on milk and explosives.
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Q_bottomNobody asked – “Yo, Syed, what’s this?”

    That’s what we are supposed to believe. Nobody else but those two had a hand in the murder of 14 innocents in San Bernardino.
    Accomplices? Zero. So they say and so we are expected to believe.
    Mr. Obama spoke to us a few moments ago. Finally called it terrorism, though not Islamic terrorism. For us to guess.
    He announced that he is taking the fight to ISIS. We should feel safe. Except that ISIS, or ISIL, as he calls it, is one problem.
    Worse is the local, the unaffiliated but radicalized freelancer who comes from within our own neighborhood.
    We know where ISIS lives. But for the introvert, the retail operator we have no address until it’s too late. Case in point, San Bernardino.
    We are not at war with Islam, said the president, so no wonder people who knew the Farooks were shocked…shocked!
    Typical Americans, say people who knew them.

    Quiet. Unassuming. Friendly. Hard-working, Doting father. Loving mother. Played Scrabble. How do you spell jihad? Capital J?
    There were no clues. Nope. Nothing to suggest a husband and wife radicalized to the hilt and armed to the teeth.
    “They lived the American dream,” said a neighbor, who likewise saw nothing, knew nothing, suspected nothing. Nothing at all.
    Golly, he was born here, good old Syed. What more do you want? Wife came from Pakistan. Wonderful country, Pakistan.   
    So what if, as rumor has it, he hated Jews and maybe Christians. Doesn’t everybody? A regular Joe, Syed.
    She kept to herself, did Tashfeen. All agree to this. Typical American wifey in a hijab. Most likely clipped coupons to save on milk and explosives.
    “They were the perfect couple,” say people who knew them as the perfect couple.

    Too bad it had to end like this. Obviously it was our fault. Global warming.
    So the president assures us that he is keeping us safe.
    Ban Radical Islamists and those Syrian migrants from entering the country and we’ll start believing.


    New York-based bestselling American novelist Jack Engelhard writes a regular column for Arutz Sheva. He is the author of the international classic “Indecent Proposal” now followed by the prophetic thriller “The Bathsheba Deadline.” Engelhard is the recipient of the Ben Hecht Award for Literary Excellence. Website: www.jackengelhard.com



    Op-Ed:  You can never be "nice" enough to the Muslims


    They want your country, your religion and your life.




    Published: Monday, December 07, 2015 10:27 AM

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 641812
    Naomi Ragen
    The writer is a best-selling American-born novelist, playwright and journalist...
    ► More from this writer



    For years, Israel has been demonized, held responsible for every terrorist atrocity from blowing up Holocaust survivors at a Passover Seder to the mutilation and murder of her Olympic athletes. It was all Israel’s fault, because she had mistreated the poor Palestinians.
    The French welcomed thousands of Muslims to France. They made them citizens, gave them access to everything the Western world has to offer.
    The French sided openly with the Palestinians, and had a hands-off policy towards Muslims, making their neighborhoods no-go zones for the police.

    Their reward? Mass killings in supermarkets, magazine offices, restaurants, a sports arena, and a concert hall by Muslims. But why? After all, the French were so “nice?”

    After the most recent French atrocity, ISIS, claiming responsibility, posted the following on its website: “Hundreds of apostates were attending an adulterous party.”
    That’s right. That’s what France is to them. Immoral. According to their standards. And so, they deserve to die. So now, what is France planning to do? To pass a law recognizing a Palestinian State.
    Huh! What?! To recognize the supporters and accomplices of the people who blew them up? Because that’s what the Palestinians are: radical Muslim terrorists. Our Prime Minister Mr. Netanyahu is flabbergasted, furious. But I’m not. The French want to be “nice,” to spare themselves further terror attacks.

    They won’t succeed. Just the opposite. This is a fact. Israel tried that. We gave them the entire Gaza Strip. We uprooted thousands of Jews. Handed over their multi-million dollar hot-house businesses. Gave them our synagogues. We even dug Jewish corpses out of the graves of Gaza cemeteries, many of them put there by Muslim terrorists, and took them out of Gaza before handing it over. We also thought we could be “nice,” make them happy, make them not hate us so much.

    And what happened? They thought we were idiots. Worse, they thought we were weak. If terror got us to do that, a lot of terror would get us to give them even more. From the site of Jewish settlements and destroyed synagogues, they set up their rocket launchers sending tens of thousands of rockets into Israel, making life unbearable for every Jew within shooting range. They dug hundreds of terror tunnels under the borders, planning a mass, murderous invasion, until the IDF had to finally go in there. And it’s still not over and won’t be until we kick every, single one of them out of Gaza, and re-take it.

    That’s the truth for anyone willing to hear it.

    Last week, Syed Rizwan Farook and his new Pakistani bride, parents of a six month-old baby, who were living the American dream, killed fourteen people, his co-workers, and injured dozens of others. And he was only just getting started on his “jihad.” Police found thousands of rounds of ammunition, pipe bombs, you name it.
    Oh, he had big plans, little Syed and his blushing Pakistani jihadi bride. He did this, even though Americans had saved his immigrant parents from that disgusting s***-hole called Pakistan, and provided him with the means to obtain higher education and a high paying job. Even though his workmates had never had any arguments with him, and had indeed, even thrown him and his new wife a baby shower!

    “They were radicalized,” the President of the United States, that ISIS-lover (that’s what the Egyptians are calling him now) has said. Not the same thing as saying they were terrorists. It means, they were good, peace-loving people but YOU made them terrorists, because … you weren’t nice enough to them.

    Listen to Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece CAIR: “When we support coup leaders in Egypt or other places, when we support dictatorship, oppressive regimes around the world that push people over on the edge, then they become extremists, then they become terrorists.”

    Loretta Lynch, U.S. Attorney General has addressed Muslim murderers killing Americans by saying she will prosecute anyone engaging in “hate speech” towards Muslims, while CNN’s Anderson Cooper tried to get the wife of a victim – a co-worker who was a Christian who loved Israel – to admit that her husband probably wasn’t “nice” enough to Syed and therefore he had it coming.

    Yes, my friends, whatever you do, you can never be “nice” enough to today’s Muslims.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Q_top

    They hate you not because of how you treat them, but because you exist and you don’t believe in their religion...
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Q_bottom

    Listen to what I’m going to tell you now. And trust me, as an American-born Israeli who has lived with Muslim terror for fifty years, it’s the truth: They hate you not because of how you treat them, but because you exist and you don’t believe in their religion, or their wondrous prophet. Because you treat women and homosexuals as human beings. Because you won’t agree that they take over your country and your lives, and submit to their rules.

    So when you die, they will tell you it’s all your fault. Because you made them mad. You made them really, really mad, so whatever horrors they are at this very moment busily planning to inflict on you (because that’s the only thing they are good at; the only thing they believe in), you deserve them. It is inevitable and you should have seen it coming.

    And so if you welcome them into your country, and give them good jobs and educations, and you throw them baby showers, and allow their foreign born fiancées K-1 visas to enter the country, they will add to their anger their contempt because you are weak and foolish and don’t understand that they are at war with you and want you dead.

    And your politicians, who are still getting advice from CAIR, will outlaw guns to make it easier for them, because they don’t need licenses for guns, believe me. But you will.
    And the states who had the guts to stand up to Obama’s flooding the U.S. with “refugees” will all back down, the way Texas has. After all, why would you want to fight against a nice Syrian family – two lovely parents, two lovely grandparents, two little kids? And why wouldn’t you give a visa for the lovely fiancée of the environmental health specialist from San Bernardino with their lovely, dimpled six month-old baby? Why?

    So you will. And in return you are going to get San Bernardinos all over the U.S.A. Then you will need to live like we live in Israel, except maybe not as safely because the people in charge of your safety have to do what your President, who is such good friends with CAIR, tells them to do, while we are protected by fellow Jews, who have wised up over the years from our own Leftist crazies who got hundreds of us blown up in buses and coffee houses while they were “giving peace a chance,” and giving the Palestinians “good-will gestures” like not frisking them at check-points for weapons, or arming their “police.”

    Now, we let our moron Leftists talk. But we don’t elect them or give them power, like you did, do, and are planning to do (Hillary is the last nail in your coffin.) Even Mr. Trump, who has said so much that is true, is a moron when it comes to Islam. He’s going to get Israel to “give concessions” to “make peace in six months.”

    I feel sorry for you America, France, Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain. So many more of you are going to die trying to be “nice” to the Muslims. Trying to make life good for them, until you realize they hate you and want you dead no matter what you do for them. You and your wife and your kids. Dead or sold into slavery, or raped or educated to be killers. Dead or willing to be part of their new world order, the great Caliphate.

    And without a radical change in thinking by the West, they are going to succeed. There is a slim window of opportunity to defeat them. But it would take extreme guts, and extreme measures, which, frankly, I don’t know if you’re capable of.
    But here it goes: Take back your country by taking away the power from your ISIS-loving presidents and prime ministers and the people and media who put them in power.
    Close down the mosques and Muslim Cultural Centers (Islamic Center of North America, CAIR etc. All the Islamic centers and mosques are connected with terror, especially in America, according to John Guandolo, an FBI expert.

    It’s not about gun control. Yes, America has a gun problem, and is filled with crazies. But terrorists are not crazy. They are warriors. They will obtain guns to make war, legal or not, and they will use them to kill people and further their agenda. Tightening gun control just at this moment when jihad has come to America isn’t a good idea, because it might mean the victims won’t be able to protect themselves.

    Besides, guns in themselves are not the problem. Israel has guns all over the place! People use them to kill terrorists, and to keep guns out of their hands. There has never been a mass shooting of women and children in Israel that wasn’t connected to a radical Muslim terrorist. 
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:24 am

    Raymond Ibrahim: Obama’s Love for Jihadis and Hate for Christians

    November 23, 2015 8:22 am By Raymond Ibrahim 41 Comments

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Obama_turban

    Obama recently lashed out against the idea of giving preference to Christian refugees, describing it as “shameful”: “That’s not American. That’s not who we are. We don’t have religious tests to our compassion,” loftily added the American president.
    Accordingly, the administration is still determined to accept 10,000 more Syrian refugees, almost all of whom will be Muslim, despite the fact that some are ISIS operatives, while many share the ISIS worldview (as explained below).
    Yet right as Obama was grandstanding about “who we are,” statistics were released indicating that “the current [refugee] system overwhelmingly favors Muslim refugees. Of the 2,184 Syrian refugees admitted to the United States so far, only 53 are Christians while 2,098 are Muslim.”
    Aside from the obvious—or to use Obama’s own word, “shameful”—pro-Muslim, anti-Christian bias evident in these statistics, there are a number of other troubling factors as well.

    For starters, the overwhelming majority of “refugees” being brought into the United States are not just Muslim, but Sunnis—the one Muslim sect that the Islamic State is not persecuting and displacing.  After all, ISIS—and most Islamic terrorist groups (Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, Al Shabaab, Hamas, et al)—are all Sunnis.   Even Obama was arguably raised a Sunni.
    In this context, how are Sunnis “refugees”?  Who are they fleeing?  Considering that the Obama administration defines refugees as people “persecuted by their government,” most of those coming into the U.S. either aided or at least sympathized with the jihad against Assad (even if theyonly revealed their true colors when the time was right).

    Simply put, some 98% of all refugees belong to the same Islamic sect that ISIS does.  And many of them, unsurprisingly, share the same vision—such as the “refugees” who recently murdered some 120 people in France, or the “refugees” who persecute Christian minorities in European camps and settlements.  (None of this should be surprising considering that Al Azhar—the Sunni world’s most prestigious university of Islamic law, which co-hosted Obama’s 2009 “A New Beginning” speech—was recently exposed as teaching and legitimizing all the atrocities that ISIS commits.)

    As for those who are being raped, slaughtered, and enslaved based on their non-Sunni religious identity—not by Assad, but by so-called “rebel” forces (AKA jihadis)—many of them are being denied refuge in America.
    Thus, although Christians were approximately 10 percent of Syria’s population in 2011, only one percent has been granted refuge in America. This despite the fact that, from a strictly humanitarian point of view—and humanitarianism is the chief reason being cited in accepting refugees, Obama’s “compassion”—Christians should receive priority simply because they are the most persecuted group in the Middle East.

    At the hands of the Islamic State, which supposedly precipitated the migrant crisis, Christians have been repeatedly forced to renounce Christ or die; they have been enslaved and raped; and they have had more than 400 of their churches desecrated and destroyed.[url=http://www.jihadwatch.org/Users/Tom/Desktop/Obama's Love for Muslims and Hate for Christians.docx#_edn1][/url]
    ISIS has committed no such atrocities against fellow Sunnis, they who are being accepted into the U.S. in droves.  Nor does Assad enslave, behead, or crucify people based on their religious identity (despite Jeb Bush’s recent, and absurd, assertions).
    Obama should further prioritize Christian refugees simply because his own policies in the Middle East have directly exacerbated their plight.  Christians and other religions minorities did not flee from Bashar Assad’s Syria, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, or Muamar Gaddafi’s Libya.  Their systematic persecution began only after the U.S. interfered in those nations in the name of “democracy” but succeeding in only uncorking the jihadi terrorists that the dictators had long kept suppressed.

    Incidentally, prioritizing Christian refugees would not merely be an altruistic gesture or the U.S. government’s way of righting its wrongs: rather it brings many benefits to America’s security. (Unlike Muslims or even Yazidis, Christians are easily assimilated into Western nations due to the shared Christian heritage, and they bring trustworthy language and cultural skills that are beneficial to the “war on terror.”)

    Finally, no one should be shocked by these recent revelations of the Obama administration’s pro-Muslim and anti-Christian policies.   They fit a clear and established pattern of religious bias within his administration… Keep reading

    Hugh Fitzgerald: Those Muslim “Refugees”
    Five more Syrians stopped at Texas border -- 13 in the past week



    The religion of peace and of a persecuted minority!
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Tue Dec 08, 2015 4:08 am


    THANK YOU ISLAM FOR ALL YOU’VE DONE FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS!

    Women have the right to wear a sheet covering their entire body or risk rape or acid thrown in their face.
    Women get to pick from the many shades of black for their Burka, Abaya or Jalbeeb.
    Women have the right to have male escorts whenever they leave their house or risk rape or arrest
    Women have the right to genital mutilation. Then they have the right to get sewn up so they can’t hardly piss.
    Women have the right to have 4 male witnesses to testify she was NOT raped
    Women have the right to have their hand cut off for using a cell phone in public
    Women have the right to be honor killed
    Women have the right to be forced to become human incubators for future terrorists.
    Women have the right to be stoned to death for the crime of NOT being able to produce 4 male witnesses in the case of adultery
    Women have the right to be treated like shi20 by their husband, their children and just about any muslim man
    Women have the right to get beat with a chair because they got their husband angry.
    Women have the right to be married off at ANY age to ANY man (most likely their first cousin)  their father SELLS them to.
    Women have the right to get only half of what their brother gets of an inheritance.
    Women have the right to obligatorily have another woman assist them at testifying in court, because their minds are too feeble and only half as good as a man's.
    Women have the right to not report rape, sodomy, incest, assault in Islamic countries because these crimes are never recorded by officials and not used in statistics.
    Married girls have the right to walk themselves to one of the many Obstetric Fistula Clinic (Only available in Islamic countries) where they can get the hole between their vagina and urethra repaired, after being raped at too young an age by their husband.
    Married girls have the right to go to Jannah early when they die in childbirth because their immature bodies can't handle pregnancy.
    Women have the right to share their husband’s earnings with up to 3 more women.
    Women have the right to a divorce, in a sharia court, after they obtain a lawyer to represent them, and only if their husband agrees, (Otherwise they can just hope their husband utters the words "i divorce you" thrice)
    Women have the right to have traffic stopped in the middle of a Saudi street intersection, so they can be quickly decapitated in said intersection for suspected witchcraft.
    Women and girls have the right to be traded as war booty sex slaves if their family belongs to the losing side of any battle started by men.
    Women and girls have the right  to be sexually harassed and groped, in the streets and in broad daylight, if any man or boy thinks her female form isn't concealed enough
    Women or girls have the right to be buried chest deep in a pit and pelted with stones until they die if they are suspected by their husbands of infidelity.
    Women used to have the right to suicide to escape the ecstasies of islam until Suicide amongst women was at record highs in Iran and a Mullah enacted a fatwa to prevent further suicides...
    "Any woman who commits suicide will have her daughters executed"
    This has stopped many unappreciative women from leaving the most perfect religion in the world.
    And women’s rights even extend to Janna where virgins have the right to work in a heavenly whorehouse where they can be abused in every way possible by muslim men and then their merciful and most beneficent pimp, alla, turns them back into virgins so the next muslim man can make them bleed and hear them scream. And they don’t even get paid whore wages.


    Now where oh where are the 'politically corrected' multicultural feminists of the western civilization?
    Ah I forgot, the 'same sex marriage' and the sexploitation of the 'Hollywood Industry', the Kardashian attires and body things and the Zionist conspirators are keeping the ardent defenders of 'women's rights' a little preoccupied!


    Daniel 11:36-38 - King James Version (KJV)
    36 And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
    37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
    38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.






    And now something rather different!
    A TRUE Moderate Muslim with a fake disguise versus a FAKE Moderate Muslim without a fake disguise and a sheik aka 'islamic scholar' - no other 'western' input religious or secular required​
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Tue Dec 08, 2015 6:33 am

    Arabs and Muslims and a Loss of a 'Stolen' Cultural Identity

    Islam as a Vehicle for Arab Supremacism

    July 20, 2015 9:09 am By Hugh Fitzgerald
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Berber-300x174-jpg

    Long ago, Bernard Lewis wrote about the “multiple identities” of the peoples of the Middle East. By that he meant that one could be Muslim, but not necessarily Arab — as Berbers and Kurds were also Muslim. One could be Arab, but not necessarily Muslim, or identify by language and culture with Arabdom, as some Arab Christians (especially “Palestinians”) do, while Copts and Maronites may not. Then there are Shi’ite Iranians, but also Shi’ite Arabs, as in Syria, who might favor one part of their identity over another. And then there were smaller peoples in the area whose identity was neither Muslim nor Arab, which made them particularly vulnerable to aggression, having no one to call upon, for they stood alone — such as the lamented Yazidis.

    The recent fighting between Berbers and Arabs in a town — Ghaadia — in southern Algeria reminds us of this crazy-quilt of peoples and tugging identities in North Africa and the Middle East. To the extent that a Berber is keenly aware of being a Berber, he is less likely to be a keen embracer of fanatical Islam, for Islam is identified with ‘Uruba, or Arabdom, the “gift of the Arabs” that demanded of non-Arab Muslims that they pray five times a day in the direction of Arabia (Mecca), ideally take Arab names, read the Qur’an in Arabic, and sometimes even construct a false Arab ancestry (as the “Sayeeds” of Pakistan) that links them to the Prophet. Not all Berbers want to be told they must ideally be Arabs.
    The clashes in Ghaadia between Arabs and Berbers offer a chance to consider how those “multiple identities” can be played upon, or appealed to, to lessen the tug of Islam among non-Arab Muslims.
    It is no mystery as to why Christian missionaries might be having their greatest success in the Kabyle, which remains the Berber heartland in Algeria. It is where the Berbers are concentrated, that is, those who were not forcibly transformed, during the centuries of Arab rule (interrupted by 132 years of French rule) into “Arabs.” (How many of those “Arabs” who now persecute the Berbers realize that they themselves are a generation, or two, or five, removed from their clearly Berber origins?)

    The cause of the Berbers is hardly known in this country. Yet the writer Kateb Yacine, a Berber who refused to write in Arabic, but chose French, is celebrated in France, especially among Berbers — but unknown in this country, and his anti-Arab rage is not likely to cause his books to be included in the syllabuses of courses on “Francophone” literature, given that so many such courses are now taught by French-speaking Arabs.
    What is that cause? In the first place, it is linguistic and cultural. In Algeria, where the French saw the Berbers as superior to the Arabs — one French general wrote a book about the “Europeanness” of the Berbers — the Berbers were not discriminated against, but as soon as the French left, the forced arabisation of the Berbers started up at once, as if the French interregnum, with the wider possibilities that French education made possible to both Berbers and Arabs, had never existed. Older people in Algeria speak and use French; the younger ones are forgetting. And meanwhile, the Berbers were forbidden to use their own language, Tamazight, in their schools or in their institutions, and even, at times, they could be punished for using it among themselves, on the street. Berber culture was officially ignored.

    About thirty years ago, news of Berber agitation began to reach the outside world. There were riots in Tizi-Ouzou that were reported in France, but hardly anywhere else in the Western world. In America, of course, we had all been sufficiently subject to ARAMCO propaganda (performed as a “public service” by the big oil companies, as part of their propaganda payoff to the Saudis for allowing them to find, produce, and then pay exorbitantly for the oil that happens to lie under the malevolent sands of “Saudi” Arabia), to believe that there is something called “the Arab world,” and in this “Arab world” there are no Copts, no Armenians, no Assyrians, no Chaldeans, no Turkmen, no Mandeans, no Maronites, and of course no Berbers, no Jews (no, there never were any Jews in North Africa or the Middle East — they all came to Israel, you see, from Europe), for everyone in the Arab world was an “Arab.”
    The discovery or re-discovery of a Berber identity (and, again, how many of those North African “Arabs” should begin to realize that they are Berbers?) is or could be an important weapon in unsettling the world of Islam, and perhaps causing the Maghreb to see itself, as it should, not as “Arab” but as the victim of Arab imperialism.
    For what is Islam if not a vehicle of Arab imperialism, and what are the Berbers, if not the victims of that Arab imperialism, an imperialism far more potent and long-lasting than the European kind, for it attempts to efface the historic identity of whole peoples?

    And it makes perfect sense that Berbers in the Kabyle, having felt along their pulses the Arab imperialism of which Islam is the vehicle, would be more open to the efforts of Christian missionaries, or more likely, are not so much responding to missionary activity, but to their own observations as to what Christianity is like, and what Islam has brought them.
    In this respect, one should not underestimate the fact that many Berbers now live in France, that they make up most of the membership of such groups as the “maghrebins laiques,” and that they, not the Arabs whose ethnic identity is so bound up with Islam, are capable, in some cases, not of identifying with the Arabs, but more closely with the French. And those Berbers communicate with Berbers at home, or through the Internet. And sometimes they return to Algeria and Morocco to see their families, and bring with them their own observations on the relative merits of the Islamic world, a world suffused with Islam, and the non-Islamic world, the one they have experienced in France.

    The more the non-Arab Muslims of the world, and 80% of the world’s Muslims are not Arab, come to realize — and it would not be hard to help them to realize, for they will not be able to deny the facts, having experienced so much of it themselves — that Islam is a vehicle for Arab supremacism, the more likely it is that at least some of them will fall away. And others, who may believe in a kind of Islam not dominated by Arabs, a “non-Arab” Islam (as if such were possible) will, in so doing, at least help to divide, and therefore to weaken, the Camp of Islam.
    Ideally, one would wish this Total System, that has held so many hundreds of millions in thrall, and thwarted over so many centuries so much human potential (think of the art, think of the science, that might have resulted in the absence of the dead hand of Islam on so many people, prevented from so many forms of artistic expression, from so many avenues for free and skeptical inquiry that are necessary for the enterprise of science, think of so much dull fanaticism, so much boredom, so much violence, in posse and in esse) will be seen, by Berbers, by Kurds, by people in the subcontinent (why should Muslims in India not “rediscover” their own history, their Hindu, or Buddhist, or other non-Muslim roots?), by those in Malaysia and the East Indies, with its rich pre-Islamic, Hindu and Buddhist past, as having helped to make them forget their own history, and this history deserves to be rediscovered.
    Meanwhile, start reading and promoting those Berber sites. And hope that the French state, instead of “integrating” its Muslims by government-supported mosques, will try to work with Berbers in France, work to make them see the light, work to help them to achieve their own destiny, one different from, and superior to, that of the Arabs whose method of cultural and linguistic domination comes from, and is supplied by, Islam.

    We should help those in North Africa (and in France) who know, are well aware, of their Berber identity. DNA could come to the rescue. There is a genetic marker that, in studies by French geneticists in Tunisia, shows that Berbers and Arabs can be easily distinguished. Some who proudly identify themselves as “Arabs” will resist. But others may listen. And as they recognize the violence, the “culture of death” of Islam, in its fanatical form, perhaps those who wish to make a break from Islam, and recognize that such a break is hardest of all for Arabs, and that another identity needs to be accepted, invented, believed in, will manage to discover, and embrace, their Berber “roots.”
    It seems fanciful, just as it seems fanciful that Iranians, those who are not merely disgusted with the mullahs running things, but are coming to be disgusted with Islam — that “gift of the Arabs” — itself, may wish to rediscover Zoroastrianism. Not because of any particular wonderfulness in what Zoroastrianism has to offer, but simply because it offers another identity (see Bernard Lewis’s excellent “The Multiple Identities of the Middle East,” to which I referred earlier), in a part of the world, and among people, who believe that “everyone simply has to be something.” And that “something” cannot be, as it is in the advanced West, a collection of ideas or ideals — as an American might define himself as loyal to the American Constitution, and wishing to defend the political and legal institutions of this country, fortunately fashioned by an inimitable group of geniuses, and fortunately, not yet made complete hash even by those who embody the degradation of the democratic dogma.

    Some Berbers accepted being considered as “Arabs,” the way some Copts and Maronites have had a false “Arab identity” pushed on them, or have only semi-accepted it, an “identity” constructed out of nothing more than the fact that they are speakers, “users,” of Arabic, and may have had Arabic names forced on them over time. Indeed, there are differences between Arabs who have become Christians (as a few did in the 19th and early 20th centuries) and those Arabic-using Christians — Maronites, Copts, Assyrians, Chaldeans — who are not Arabs, but some of whom have, in order to survive in an ever-threatening Muslim sea, had to find their role as “Arabs” or even, in the manner of the Christian Syrian Michel Aflaq (one of the founders of Ba’athism), become hyper-Arab nationalists, as promoters of an Arab identity, pan-Arabism, the whole works — an alternative to Islam (they were fooling themselves, because pan-Arabism for Muslim Arabs was never a real alternative to Islam, but merely a temporary goal, a subset, of the goal of a reunified Muslim world. In the end Islam triumphed).
    Not every ill that befell the non-Muslims in the Muslim world, or non-Arabs in the Muslim Arab world, can be attributed to colonial powers. There were French, during the time of the “presence francaise” who brought schools, hospitals, modern agriculture, and other elements of modern civilization, to North Africa (in Morocco and Tunisia, over about half-a-century; and in Algeria, over a 132-year period) who were quite capable of distinguishing Berbers from Arabs, and it was not their pressure that caused some Berbers to forget their own identity, any more than it was France as the guarantor of the Christians in Lebanon and Syria who caused some to make themselves hyper-Arabs. Aflaq co-founded the Ba’ath party with two associates not when the French seemed to be there to stay, but when it was clear that they would, in a few years, be leaving, and Arab nationalism would be the cover to protect the Arab Christians from Islam.

    Aflaq’s “Ba’athism” came to dominate only two countries, and for two similar reasons. The first was Syria, with a large Christian population, and with a powerful military caste, the Alawites, who were not regarded as orthodox Muslims, were indeed disliked by orthodox Muslims for the obvious elements of syncretism in their worship (go to an Alawite village and see the pictures of Mary everywhere), these Alawites who had been miserable under the domination of Sunni Islam but under that of the French formed part of the Troupes speciales, were trained to fight, and when the French left, the Alawites remained in the army, and the air force (with Colonel Hafez al-Assad), and gradually took over, in the way that people or groups always take over in the Muslim Middle East — through the application, or threat, of military force. In Syria Ba’athism tried to disguise, was the facade, for the rule by the Alawites.
    In Iraq, Ba’athism took a different turn. There, the Sunnis knew that they were numerically far inferior to the Shi’a, even if they kept denying it. Nonetheless, once they were put in control of modern Iraq, by the British, they never lost their grip until the Americans arrived in 2003 and overturned the old order.

    The Hashemite king, Feisal, a Sunni, was put in control of Iraq, and aided throughout the 1920s by British troops, and such British civilians as the celebrated archaeologist Gertrude Bell, until finally, the expense of suppressing the tribes, and the obvious hopelessness of it all, caused the British to leave. It was Winston Churchill who described Mesopotamia (Iraq) as an “ungrateful volcano.” And when the British left, the local Arabs solemnly promised not to harm the local Christians, and five months after the last British troops pulled out, Muslim Arabs killed up to 100,000 largely helpless Assyrians. (William Saroyan wrote a book about it).
    Everywhere Muslims spreading Islam are careful to present it as the vehicle for whatever grievance the potential local converts may have. If it is black prisoners in the United States, then Islam is presented as the vehicle both of “social justice” (see how Muslim ruling classes everywhere seize the national wealth, see how well the poor are treated in Muslim countries), and against “racism.” And the Infidels do little or nothing. Have you seen any campaigns of deliberate counter-Da’wa anywhere in the prisons of the West? It would be easy to show, and to keep showing, perhaps by organizing the “Lost Boys” of the Sudan, that anti-black racism, of the purest and most virulent kind, is found among the Arabs. Anyone who has studied in an Arab country returns amazed at what is openly said about blacks, and not a few are shaken. Anyone who looks into the history of African slavery soon discovers that the Arab slave trade began earlier, and ended later, than that of the Europeans – or rather, ended formally later, but actually continues, in several countries, to this day. Why is this not screamed from every housetop? Why have the countries of the advanced world, that have poured $400 billion into aid to black Africa, not tried to halt the spread of the most retrograde force, a force which encourages the habit of mental submission, and which, in its inshallah-fatalism, is in fact fatal to economic development, not tried to stop the spread of Islam? If they have the wellbeing of black Africans at heart, they must begin to understand, and to share their understanding, that Islam has been, is, and always will be, a force that hinders, with that inshallah-fatalism and that habit of mental submission, any possibility of either economic or intellectual development.

    The evidence is there. What sustained the Muslims for centuries, at a low level, was simply the accumulated intellectual capital of those peoples whom they conquered, and slowly leached of life, and of property as well. Now North Africa and the Middle East are virtually emptied of the local non-Muslims who once provided a certain supply of Jizyah. What sustains the Arabs and Muslims are two things, and only two things; the new disguised Jizyah of Western foreign aid (which should be ended, and used to meet the new expenses of monitoring Muslim populations in the West), and the manna of oil wealth, entirely undeserved, and the only conceivable way that the Arabs and Muslims might acquire great wealth – through an accident of geology. Are the peoples of black Africa to be misled into thinking that they, too, will somehow share in that wealth if they are Muslim?


    There was once a very large and intelligent, because it focused on small-scale, doable projects, aid effort by Israel in black Africa. It was the most successful of all such foreign aid efforts. It was widespread. It was widely welcomed. But it came to an end, after the Six-Day War, under Arab pressure, and bribery – the same bribery that caused several dozen African states, under Arab command, to break diplomatic relations with Israel. Some of those African states no doubt thought that the Arabs would share just a little of that vast unearned wealth – if only to replace what Israel, a tiny country, had so remarkably provided. It was not to be. It will never be. The Arab Muslims are trying in Africa to dominate the Continent. They are patient. They are methodical. In West Africa, where Islam is already dominant, as in uranium-rich Niger, they have transformed the easygoing, syncretistic practice of Islam to something much more akin to what can be seen in Saudi Arabia. And everywhere mosques are becoming subject to the strictures of those who pay for them, or pay the imams – and that usually means the Saudis. In some countries that once had a clear Christian majority, such as the Ivory Coast, the Christians are feeling besieged by Muslims who come in from the north, and the French government under Chirac understood their fear, but did not support the local black Christians, but rather attempted to appease the world’s Muslims. Boko Haram has not been stopped; it becomes more powerful every day and not just in Nigeria.

    In East Africa, when the black Africans rose up against their Arab masters in Zanzibar and Pemba some decades ago (the slave trade by the Arabs in East Africa had been centered there – indeed, the Sultan of Muscat and Oman had for a time ruled directly from Zanzibar), little was made of this in the West. No one discussed the long history of the Arab slave trade, with its practice of castrating black children when they were first caught, and then taking them by slave coffle or dhow to the slave markets of Islam, a trip which about 10% survived (see “The Hideous Trade” by Jan Hogedorn). And so the Arabs have continued their march southward. The Sudan had very few Arabs in the southern part one hundred years ago. But steadily they have taken territory, pushed back, killed, black Africans. 1.8 million non-Muslim blacks were killed, or deliberately starved to death, in the southern Sudan in the last two decades. Not content with that, not content with having seized complete control of the oil wealth that lies under the Christian and animist areas of the artificial state of Sudan, the Arabs are now trying to seize, by mass murder, the lands as well of the Muslim, but non-“Arab” blacks of Darfur. The campaign of mass rape, destruction of property, and killing of every man, woman and child they can get their hands on has been reported and reported, and reported. It has been reported without any understanding of Islam as a vehicle for Arab supremacism (the nicholas-kristofs of this world never bothered to figure out what was going on, what ideology prompted the Janjaweed and the Sudanese government that supported it, or the other Arab and Muslim governments that ran interference for that Sudanese government), but are content with writing endless columns of easy anguish.

    Americans and other Infidel peoples should be supporting Ethiopian efforts to halt the spread of Islam, or of the purest kind of Islam, whether in Somalia or in Ethiopia itself, and to help Ethiopia remain a Christian kingdom that can help prevent the takeover of southern East Africa by Islam. Muslims owe their loyalty to the umma al-islamiyya, to fellow Muslims. It would make sense, in Africa, for the Americans not only to have handfuls of advisors and troops here and there, but to engage in propaganda. This propaganda, which happens to be the truth simply megaphoned to make a point, should describe in vivid detail the history of the Arab slave trade. It should explain to Africans that slavery is permanently sanctioned by both Qur’an and Sunnah, and can therefore never, within Islam, be banished. It should detail the continuing racism of the Arabs. And it should show how Islam stands in the way of economic and other kinds of development in two ways: in the encouragement of the habit of mental submission, central to Islam, and in the inshallah-fatalism that limits economic activity, and how Islam has relied on two kinds of manna: the Jizyah that is demanded from, or voluntarily supplied by, non-Muslims, and the oil wealth that has resulted from an accident of geology. And despite the thirty trillion dollars that the Arab and Muslim states have received from oil revenues since 1973, not a single one has managed to create a real economy, not a single one–those, like Turkey or Tunisia or Lebanon, that had both a large non-Muslim or secular class, and income from tourism and trade to count on — has ceased to be hopelessly dependent on oil.

    Islam, as it spreads, will merely guarantee that the countries and peoples of sub-Saharan Africa will be forced to endure the political, economic, social, moral, and intellectual failures of Muslim states and societies – failures whose source can be found in Islam itself.
    Do we wish black Africa well, or ill? If we do wish to help the peoples of black Africa, preventing or halting the spread of Islam makes sense. And it makes sense for us to help others, such as the Berbers who were fighting in Ghaadia, to regain their history, their language and their culture, and it makes sense for us, in other ways, as well to promote pride in pre- or non-Islamic culture, among the many peoples called “Muslim” who have another identity to look to, if they feel the impulse to do so.

    Charlie Hebdo surrenders, will no longer draw Muhammad
    UK jihadi who supported Taliban returns to UK after release from US jail


    Last edited by shiloh on Mon Dec 14, 2015 3:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:31 am

    A Not so 'Radicalised' Unplanned Abberration of Terrorist Islam - Disclosure for the Sheeple, alternative and mainstream

    The Politics of Islam

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Islam110

    Document reveals ISIS plot for world domination in chilling detail: Full translation below

    By Document reveals ISIS plot for world domination in chilling detail: Full translation below ByPamela Geller on December 7, 2015
    - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/doc...-translation-below.html/#sthash.Ouus5BFs.dpuf Pamela Geller on December 7, 2015
    Global Jihad
    23 Comments

    - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/doc...-translation-below.html/#sthash.Ouus5BFs.dpuf

    The report “shows an unprecedented level of sophistication.” Unprecedented? There’s plenty of precedent, from Muhammad on down. Read the document. It’s 24 pages. It is all in the cause Islam, jihad, and Muhammad.
    Anyone who suggests the Islamic State is not Islam is clueless, complicit or evil. A document outlining how ISIS organises the vast territory it controls has been unearthed – and the terror group is far more sophisticated than we feared.
    Then who feared? The liberal lapdogs for Islam? Islamic apologists? I have warned of this — for years.
    A handful (if that) of colleagues, too. We were/are attacked, ridiculed and violently opposed. I was right about it all. So believe me when I tell you, you ain’t seen nuthin yet.

    “ISIS plot for world domination revealed in chilling detail with plans for education and industry,” By Sam Webb, The Mirror, December 7, 2015 The leaked document outlines how the terror group is trying to build a state complete with guidelines for education, natural resources, industry, diplomacy, propaganda and the military

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Sheikh-jalaluddin-training-camp-isis-afghanistan_0052-jpg
    Dossier: An ISIS document has revealed how sophisticated their government is

    A document outlining how ISIS organises the vast territory it controls has been unearthed – and the terror group is far more sophisticated than we feared. The leaked dossier outlines how the terror group is trying to build a state complete with guidelines for education, natural resources, industry, diplomacy, propaganda and the military.
    The 24-page document ‘Principles in the administration of the Islamic State’ gives an incredible insight into the well-funded regime. Written by an Egyptian called Abu Abdullah, outlines how kids must receive “training on bearing light arms”.
    He also calls for a single identity for the terror group to unite both foreigners and locals and makes the case for establishing independent “factories for local military and food production”. The report, which was obtained by the Guardian , shows an unprecedented level of sophistication.
    Charlie Winter, a senior researcher for Georgia State University told the newspaper: “Far from being an army of irrational, bloodthirsty fanatics, IS (Islamic State) is a deeply calculating political organisation with an extremely complex, well-planned infrastructure behind it.”

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Isis2-jpg

    The terror group’s horrific indoctrination techniques were laid bare in a recent propaganda video showing a young boy whose mother was raped and his father killed by ISIS.
    He is being turned into a cold-blooded killing machine by the terror group. The youngster has appeared in a new ISIS propaganda video executing a person in Syria, reports Mosul Eye, a group documenting life in the Iraqi city.
    In a statement, the group said: “ISIS kidnapped this child first thing when it took over Sinjar, and they raped his mother and sisters and killed his father and brother. “He is one in a large group of children that ISIS kidnapped. ISIS turned this innocent child to a killing machine.” Meanwhile, Syria’s government has accused the US-led coalition of launching air strikes on a Syrian army camp that killed three soldiers and wounded 13. The government has sent a protest letter to the UN over the incident, which took place in the country’s east. If confirmed, the air strikes would mark the first time coalition forces fighting ISIS in Syria and Iraq have attacked Syrian government forces.

    The ISIS Papers: 4-page document, translated below, outlines principles for governing territory under the group’s control and strategy for becoming a viable state. Emphasis are mine:

    Islamic State Caliphate on the prophetic methodology
    In the name of God, the compassionate, the merciful:


    “No, by your Lord, they will not believe until they have you rule over them in what they have disagreed and find in themselves from what you have judged and willingly submit.”

    Principles in the administration of the Islamic State – 1435AH [2103-2014]
    Introduction In the name of God, the compassionate, the merciful As for what follows: After 50 years of jihad whose sides have fallen prostrate in the totality of the land, and the states gathered against the centres of the Sunni jihad in the world, God ennobled his true soldiers whom he selected to establish the caliphate state whose fortresses had fallen at the hands of global Zionism in al-Astana [Istanbul] 100 years ago.
    [Note: This is a reference to the end of the Ottoman caliphate in 1924].

    Indeed the establishment of the Islamic State, its concept does not stand on the basis of a mujahid soldier fighting and bearing his arms, nor does it rest on da’wa [evangelising] in a mosque or a street, but rather it is a comprehensive system requiring the leaders of the ummah [Muslim nation] to realise its concepts.

    So on the expansion of the Islamic State, the state requires an Islamic system of life, a Qur’anic constitution and a system to implement it, and there must not be suppression of the role of qualifications, skills of expertise and the training of the current generation on administering the state.
    From the start of the uprising of blessed Syria against the Nusayris [derogatory for Alawites], the mujahideen came in great numbers out of zeal for their religion.

    But some of them harboured Arab nationalist and tribalist arrogance, and others a zeal and will without shari’a aims.
    But it was inevitable that there would be an organisation of these numbers and their principles as a shari’i [Islamically legitimate] organisation accepting the current reality that the world marshalled against it from its soldiers and intelligence services.

    And from then there would be the confrontation of altering the principles and selling out to which the first mujahideen [fighters] did not show deference in Afghanistan, Iraq, Chechnya and elsewhere. And from then there would be the cultivation of educational and societal change with which the muhajireen [immigrants] co-existed and organisation of their ranks with the ansar [natives] – the people of the land.

    And there were many challenges and difficulties that one would have to deal with according to its establishment and according to its special ideological programme, and one must deal with each one of them on an individual basis.

    Chapter one - Announcement of the Islamic Caliphate

    The announcement of the renewal of the caliphate in Iraq in the year 1427AH [2006] was the arbiter between division and separation as well as the glory of the Muslims. That year was tantamount to the hemiplegia for the idolatrous west that began preparing equipment and projects to strike any project of the Islamic State, and the announcement of the caliphate.

    And the announcement of the caliphate was the result of the mujahideen’s realising the lack of advantage in fighting against the idolaters without the existence of a leader and caliph who could gather the Muslims under his banner and be a figure of strength for them.

    America and its allies were able to destroy the caliphate project [ie the Islamic State of Iraq] to a great extent in Iraq after they established the Sunni Iraqi Sahwa forces [Sunni Awakening tribal forces that fought the Islamic State of Iraq] and struck the Sunni nursemaid [ie basis of Sunni support for the Islamic State of Iraq], by portraying it as a treacherous terrorist state of hypocritical political projects, with great marshalling of the media to accomplish that.

    The deeds of the soldiers of the state thus became limited to security operations to strike American targets and their allies. After the arising of the blessed uprising of Syria, the Islamic State had a great role in striking the Nusayris in it and destroying the pillars of the rule of Assad in the heart of the command centres. And it has therefore been the case that the lesson to be learned from the prior leaders of the state is the way to benefit from prior mistakes, and the means to preserve the revolutionaries of Syria on the jihadi trend while not moulding them in a western framework which that western support brings. And in the second chapter is a statement on the administration of the muhajir (foreign) mujahid in particular and developing the creed of the Islamic State among the ansar in Syria.

    The announcement of the caliphate in Syria was a powerful blow that the agents of the west who were set on the direction of the Sahwat of Iraq by whom the west thought that it could put an end to the Islamic caliphate project as it had weakened it in Iraq did not expect.

    There were new modified problems that the leadership of the state was able to deal with, among them [Abu Muhammad] al-Joulani, [Note: the leader of al-Qaida in Syria formerly of Islamic State] announcement of his rejection of joining the Islamic State despite his allegiance to the caliph in Iraq, and in that he was trying to split the ranks and sabotage the project in subordination to his personal agendas bound with regional states, and his rejection was a confrontation for the Islamic project that God gave victory to despite the multitude of those discouraged and the callers to humiliation and servitude.

    And the one who witnesses the events of Syria sees how God has given might to the Islamic State and lowered Joulani and those with him.

    Chapter two - Organisation of the individual and group

    With the entry of the second year of the uprising of Syria, the Shia militias of various nationalities entered Syria to fight at the side of the Nusayri-Rafidite [Assad] regime which flaunted its crimes with regards to the Sunnis, which led to a global Islamic uprising represented in the hijra [migration] of thousands of Muslim youths to fight in the rank of the Sunnis from the various regions of the land.

    Thousands migrated to Syria to fight alongside the mujahideen, without their knowing the direction of any faction, its affiliation or private agendas.

    It was necessary to prepare a sound programme in which the muhajireen might take refuge as their jihad is the result of the glory to Islam and the monotheists. So the announcement of the caliphate was the obligation that gathers those arriving in the land of jihad, strengthens their hearts – and through it their minds are set – and gathers them over the difference of their colours under one banner, one word and one caliph.

    The majority of the first muhajireen came from the Gulf states and the Arabic Maghreb whose zeal for their religion urged them on, and among them were those with zeal for their Arab Sunni brothers without religious jihadist inhibition, and without there being for them prior expertise in global jihadi organisations. After them was hijra [migration] from the states of the world after the announcement of the caliphate, as no disbelieving state has remained which hasn’t also suffered from the hijra [migration] of its youth to support the Islamic State which the soldiers of Joulani and the apostate Sahwa forces from the Free [Syrian] Army and others besides them rejected.

    And after that, Sheikh Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi ordered to establish a first camp which included the new muhajireen [immigrants] who had no deeply ingrained expertise and creed, near the prior borders for the Sykes-Picot “Iraq-Syria” lines.
    And the camp included the organisation of the muhajir [immigrant] individual in the Islamic State and laying aside local tribalism and ignorance before him, and making his affiliation to the religion alone and under one banner. And the camp included nurturing the spirit of the brothers between the muhajireen and the ansar through laying aside the prior identity for the muhajir, and making him a resident in the Islamic State with his family without feelings of estrangement or distinguishing between him and his brothers from the muhajireen and the ansar.

    And without Islam it is not possible for this change to be included which encountered difficulty in the beginning on account of place affiliation that the mujahideen felt on the day of their fight with the Free Army Sahwa and inclinations of nationalism and ethnic division which was making the muhajir lose his zeal to fight alongside them.

    And there resulted from the camp the formation of joint fighting groups between the muhajireen and the ansar established on the basis of the leadership of the individual most capable of bearing responsibility, having prior expertise and the military and sharia [law] tests of the camp.

    And there also resulted from the camp the formation of groups composed of the muhajireen from the western states in particular in view of the difficulty of linguistic communication in the beginning and launch stage and in view of the mutual understanding and precedence of coordination between some of the muhajireen from Chechnya and France to fight in single cells without the existence of any distinction for members from those besides them [ie there was no differential treatment on the basis of ethnic identity].

    And it was inevitable that Arabic character should precede over the character of the muhajireen, for the language of the Qur’an is Arabic, and the prophetic hadiths [sayings] are in Arabic and the customs of Islamic society were Arabic in great part, and in view of the nature of the local society of the peoples of Syria it was inevitable that Arabic character should be cultivated in the language and religious culture in the muhajireen and laying aside the foreign identity that bears in its hidden nature hostility to Islam, its culture and its roots.

    For unifying the life of the mujahid and his language and culture is the guarantor for unifying the rank of the mujahideen and realising their total belonging in the Islamic State that includes muhajireen from every corner of the earth.


    Chapter three - Administration of the camps

    The preparatory camp is the first home and school of the mujahid in which his military and jihadi training sessions take place and he undergoes sufficient education in matters of his religion, life and jihad.
    And according to the plans of the Islamic State to nurture the caliphate generation, the camps are divided into three types:

    1. Continuation camps

    And these are special camps for the mujahideen who lead in the jihad and those who are masters of expertise in managing and planning the battle in beginning and end. And the camp includes physical preparation for 15 days. And that is in a training session every year, and the mujahid through that camp comes upon the latest arts of using weapons, military planning and military technologies currently put forth in battles and weapons whose use by the enemy are anticipated, along with detailed commentary on the technologies of enemy use of the weapons, areas of their use, their strength and how the soldiers of the state can take advantage of them.


    2. First preparation camps

    For the mujahid on the day he joins the Islamic State, whether as a muhajir or from the ansar: and the camp includes sharia sessions through which the mujahid studies the fiqh [jurisprudence] of the rulings, Islamic doctrine, al-wala’ and al-bara’ [loyalty and disavowal], in addition to the arts of fighting and the arts of using weapons, with screening of every mujahid in a specialty in which he excels and completing his camp according to his skill in specific weapons.


    3. Preparation camp for children

    The camp includes sharia sessions in fiqh of doctrine and rulings, with special sessions in Islamic society and manners, and training on bearing light arms and the principles of use.
    Outstanding individuals are selected from them for security portfolio assignments, including checkpoints, patrols and the various Amniyat units [internal security units].
    And the camps administration is responsible for planning, aims and results, and as the results of the camp should be in alignment with the aims and principles of the Islamic State, it has been necessary to establish a centre for the administration of the camps whose tasks are as follows:

    1. Preparing special sharia sessions in the camps in coordination with the al-Buhuth and al-Eftaa [fatwa – legal opinion] committee.
    2. Preparing educational programmes to teach the Arabic language and recitation of the Qur’an in coordination with the Diwan al-Ta’aleem [department of education] for every province.
    3. Preparing military programmes teaching the types of weapons and military tactics with the supervision of the military commander in every province.
    4. Studying expenditures and allowances for every camp whose study and analysis are to be completed by the military leader or wali [governor] of every area according to the needs connected with every wilaya [province] and submitting the study to the wali.
    5. Overseeing the selection of the educational and training staff in the camp.
    6. Putting in place detailed planning and programmes on the course of the battle.
    7. Tracking the supervision of the camp according to the defined programmes.
    8. Assessing the camp session and raising a report to the officials concerning the readiness of the session after the camp.

    Chapter four - Direction administration

    The mujahid [soldier] remains in need of direction and tracking after his completion of the special training session for him, for spiritual direction is the foundation of his success in every matter he undertakes and the mujahid’s direction in every stage will consist of reminding him of the aims of the Islamic State and hadiths [prophetic sayings] on the virtue of the mujahid and persevering and continuing despite the difficulty of the path of jihad.

    1. Direction before the battle

    And here the military commander for the mission or the sharia official accompanying him should undertake it, and the direction should be a little before the launching of the mujahid to battle through mentioning hadiths on the virtue of jihad and endurance on encountering the enemy as well as following the decisions and instructions of the field commander during the battle, along with the virtue of martyrdom in the path of God to raise the banner of Islam and the caliphate and the virtue of the one struck with wounds in the land of the battle. All this should be done during the readying and preparation for the battle. And the director oversees the mujahideen in all their moments until their absence from him in the battle. And the director should not be discouraged, having doubts, hesitating or cowardly because he is the example that the mujahid summons whenever the furnace of the battle flares up.

    2. Direction after the battle:

    In the event of victory, the director summons what came from the Prophet from sayings on the virtue of the mujahid and their feelings that what they have accomplished aspires to be in the service of their religion and creed, with their being reminded to embrace the instructions coming from the battle leadership from the rulings of spoils and not adopting any decision to plunder the wealth of the people except by its rights and by explicit order from the commander responsible. In the event of being broken, the direction should be on patience, reckoning and steadfastness on meeting the enemy while not heeding those having doubts and those who spread rumour and terror in the ranks of the soldiers.

    3. Lasting direction:

    Remaining on activity and steadfastness with the mujahid in all his states and lessons in al-wala and al-bara [loyalty and disavowal] as well as fiqh, Islamic creed and listening to and obeying the amir [leader]. The staff of direction in every province should be from the cream of the crop of free sharia and military officials who have the ability to argue, convince and encourage as well as from the soldiers around whom the group have congregated and should be possessors of confidence among them.

    Chapter five - Organisation of the provinces

    The Sykes-Picot agreement and after them the indirect rule of the west over the states of Islam tried to place administrative borders drawing social, madhhabist and ethnic differences in every region, and deepening the roots of the differences between the Sunni Muslims. Thus the distinction of the Sunnis from the Shia in the provinces of Iraq and oversight of the centres of administration in every Sunni region, and even the appointment of officials in the Sunnis’ regions from the filth of the Rafidites have been clear, while the regions have been entrusted under the rule of [their own] Kurdish and Shia sects independent in decision-making from the ruling presidency as we have seen in Kirkuk and Irbil and in even smaller regions including from them in the cursed Najaf and Karbala and that have enjoyed “religious” administrative independence, unannounced. All those divisions have also forbidden the Sunnis from the simplest of their rights while making the Nusayris masters of the sea, and the Shia in Iraq the kings of oil and the merchant pathways, and the Yazidi Kurds the sheikhs of the mountains while the Druze have become masters over the mountains overseeing Israel. All that has not merely been a coincidence, but it was a dirty political decision in order to implement a tightening stranglehold on the Sunnis and make them the most remote people and strip them of all assets for advancement or thinking of a rightly-guided Islamic State. If we were to see today the borders of the Islamic State and the borders of the Sunnis regions, we would see them torn apart, besieged and persecuted, for there are the Shia from the south of Iraq, the Nusayris from the west of Syria and the communist Kurdish parties to their north, and the Druze to their south. So it is no surprise that today we see the bloodshed flowing in the land of Syria and Iraq. So it has been from the law and sound mind to redraw the borders of the provinces and give lengthy consideration to every development that occurs in the region. Thus we protect the power of the Sunnis and strengthen its expansion and focal points, and then special teams can be deployed for fundamental change in the structuring of the regions that are subject to the rule of the Islamic State. And that was what the companions [of the Prophet Muhammad] and after them the caliphs pursued against every heretic community: that is, dispersing their groupings so there no longer remained any impeding opinion, strength or ability, and the Muslim alone remains the master of the state and decision-making and no one is in conflict with him. And in what there is no doubt is the fact that among the assets of the ummah [Islamic nation] are: its wealth, the nature of its land, its inhabitants and its water. And in everything is distinction:

    1.Wealth of the state

    It is the principal component and source of financing for all internal and external operations, and the existence of secure financial resources whose value does not change in every time and place is a must – and the need of the people for them should be clear with the nations unable to do without them despite the existence of the impediments that prevent their use and purchase from the land of the state.
    This includes oil and gas and what the land possesses including gold as currency that does not deteriorate or decline, as well as trade routes from which they have no wealth and all of it should be the intervention of the Islamic State as a powerful side in all their plans and such that they cannot pretend that it has no existence and might.

    2. The nature of its land

    The state cannot remain without the existence of the land that allows for its continuation and expansion, for the assets of the land are – the mountains, the agricultural lands, the sea and the river – for these natural assets are what makes the Islamic State acquire its importance and the importance of location, and the agreement of the west in Sykes-Picot were established on the basis of depriving the Sunnis from those assets, as the mountains were granted to the Kurds, Druze and Alawites, while the sea was granted to the Rafidites and Nusayris, while the river and what surrounds it in investment for the Jews and the agricultural lands under their administration. And that was a new setback that was added to all the ambitions in establishing the Islamic State and freeing it from servitude of the filthy Nusayris and the disbelieving Rafidites [Alawites and Shia]. When there is no asset for them the enemy have been shut on their openings from every side.

    3. The traitorous governments have tried to mislead the Sunni peoples in every Arab land, as corrupt programmes were introduced for them and there spread among them the love of vice, bonds, bribery, usury and abandoning worship and forgetting the rulings of jihad. So the Sunnis in Syria have lived in a new ignorance after ignorance during the French occupation of their land as there was the Alawite government that planted its vices in every house, permitted the forbidden and made forbidden development and civilisation.

    But after the uprising undertaken by the Sunnis in Iraq and Syria and their getting rid of the servitude to the tyrants began the second plan that requires implementing the “demographic” change in their regions and expelling the Sunnis from their areas, for it has been what we saw in Fallujah, Aleppo, Homs, Tikrit and other areas besides them from the regions of the Sunnis many of whose people have suffered during their presence in their land.

    Indeed they realise that the Islamic State cannot renew the ummah’s blood without a human member capable of always producing, and there was the alluring of the best of its youth and plundering the land with hijra outside their areas and liquidating many of them.

    And today it is necessary to have a studied plan that responds in kind and brings about like change in the profane abode of disbelief, expelling its people and killing its people until there is no base for them and the land is for God and his servants.

    And in turn implementing the plans that include the return of the Muslim youth to their land and bringing together the skills from the land of the Muslims, and the going out of the state for specialised staff in their fields if they are not of those of the pact in Islam [ie Jews and Christians].

    Chapter six - Administration of wealth

    Indeed the might of the Islamic State can only be through its being free entirely from all bonds of tyranny that the west possesses as means of leverage against it, and it moves them according to its need and whim based on knowing from it the need of the mujahideen for support, wealth and weapons.
    Jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria have lived through long bonds of humiliation pledged on conditional western support, until they seized wide areas of the land and possessed all assets of advancement. And all of that is on account of the ignorant administration that controls them and keeps them under western guardianship for all their activities, wars and expansion.

    Indeed the Islamic State’s seizure of vast areas includes all assets of advancement that does not suffice without the existence of an administration managing the interests and managing the crises. So it is necessary for a plan to be put in place including the might of the state and its independence as we specify in the following points:
    – Preserving the capabilities [personnel and infrastructure] that managed the production projects under the prior governments, whilst taking into account the need to place strict oversights and an administration affiliated with the Islamic State.
    – Placing specialists in accounting and oversight over all production directorates in the Islamic State including establishments of oil, gas, archaeological areas and factories for manufacturing and production.
    – Preserving additional reserves that ensure the continuation of operation in one successive arrangement in all circumstances.
    – Regulating expenses through a comprehensive administration including collective expenses and collective production without singling out a province or group by provision of estimates exceeding their needs in normal circumstances.
    – Establishing factories for local military and food production and independence from the monopoly of arms dealers for materials of necessity and cutting them off in the event of contravening the interests.
    – Realising local needs and providing for them within the borders of the state in isolated safe zones and connecting trade routes inside the state through principal centres and beneficiary wings.
    – Reducing excess expenditure through the administration of the province; it must operate independently and be able to take its own decisions in matters concerning the province.
    – Relying on external business as a principal source of income through the openings of the state to the other side without an intermediary. Direct exchange has better guarantees than the monopoly of the intermediary for business transactions and means of connection.

    Chapter seven - Administration of the projects

    In parallel with military preparation in the lines of fighting and the camps, a committee is to be put in place to administer production projects and put in place plans to implement new investment projects. The one who invests in the lands of the state is to be given comprehensive protection according to the agreement that arises with the observance of the interests of the Islamic State in production, exporting and prices. The independence of the investor from the administration of the province is a more preferred means for the administration of the wealth, increasing local production and improving the capability of the producing material, and regulating the time and expenditure.

    And it will [also] be a better guarantee against losses resulting from any sizeable investment project. Advertisement For the independent foundation is outside the limits of liability that arise for those projects that are affiliated with a province of the Islamic State. And it is not right for the investor according to the law, to hand over the production to those who have no right to it and they [those who have the right to it] are the ones determined in an agreement by the administration that is entrusted over the project and overseeing its organisation by the province in which the project is established. And such an agreement is stipulated on determining the beneficiaries and the means of profit with the guarantee of the [Islamic] State to convey the products internally to the borders of the Islamic State without exposing them to any risk. And it is not allowed to invest in the following projects:

    1. Oil products

    It is not allowed for a person who has no pledge of allegiance on his neck to the caliph to invest in an oil or gas field or what has arisen from their trajectory, but it is allowed besides that to produce derivatives after buying the crude products from the fields of the Islamic State, just as it is allowed to sell and deal in them inside and outside the state.

    2. Gold and antiquities

    It is not allowed to excavate for gold and antiquities except by expressed agreement from the resources department, and all transferred and stored materials will be confiscated for the interest of the treasury. And it is allowed to deal in gold not excavated from the ground according to the well-known aharia frameworks with immediate effect.

    3. Weapons

    It is forbidden to establish factories to produce weapons and materials particular to them without granting of any explicit permits for the situation, just as it is forbidden to establish shops to sell public weapons besides personal weapons and deal in them without prior knowledge and agreement from the responsible military amir in the wilaya. As for the other principal goods that also come under the crux of people’s lives, the officials must know about all means of operation and production like dealing in water, flour and livestock.


    Chapter eight - Administration of education

    Education is the foundation upon which Islamic society is built, and it is the division that makes the Muslims differ in their lives from the rest of the paths of disbelief. The previous Ba’athist and Shia governments tried to deviate the Muslim generation from their path through their educational programmes that concord with their governments and political whims. The programmes focused on glorifying the ruling authorities and discarding differences between sects, stripping Sunnis of their identity. And among the most important of their goals were:

    1. Focusing on glorifying and eternalising the leaders and taking refuge in God and inserting them into hidden shirk [idolatry] through immortalising ephemeral, temporary personalities.

    2. Spreading the aims of their parties and their ideas whilst distancing the nurtured from Islamic thought, because the ruling party considers itself the pulse of society and the symbol of its endurance, while Islamic principles are for the mosque only and between man and his Lord with severe proceedings against all those who tried to do away with party thinking or modify it.

    3. Discarding the difference with the disbelieving sects, and considering co-existence with them as the true societal bond that the ummah must operate in accordance with in order to preserve its goals, while in reality protection is implemented for the rights of all the communities of disbelief while oppressing the Sunnis and their principles.

    4. Spreading the culture of moral dissolution by promoting it through expressions of civilisation and exchanges of cultures with the west.

    And thus it was that the ummah entered into labyrinths of confusion that made it forget its glory, its strength and its past, while the prior Islamic caliphates were portrayed as being a foreign occupation that arose on the basis of ignorance and the decline of the ummah and nationalism.

    – And among the aims of the Islamic programme in the Islamic State:

    1. Implanting Islamic values in society as well as sound, sharia-based societal manners and customs.

    2. Correcting the erroneous narrations that the prior programmes had implanted about the prior caliphs and imams.

    3. Developing Islamic society on the basis of manners and on sharia.

    4. Raising a knowledgeable Islamic generation capable of bearing the ummah and its future without needing the expertises of the west.

    So it is also that the Islamic school is one of the houses of worship, whose aims are confined to acquiring knowledge also, but also it is an educational nurturing ground that raises the individual with comprehensive development of mind and body.
    And in it there should be training facilities for mind, body and vocation, as successful programmes cannot rely on what is written between the lines, without practical training on all given subjects.
    Also it is the case that the interest in the Arabic language and its use in daily life for the individual is an important matter in the Islamic State as is distancing from vulgar expressions that were put forward in society in a well-considered plan to guarantee the forgetting of the Islamic identity for society.

    Chapter nine - Administration of relations

    External relations are the first foundation for building every nascent state, and they are among the foundations that show the strength and might of the state. They should constitute for it a general stance in everything that happens in the world with the people of Islam and be for it an external hand protecting its dealings.

    And the Prophet (peace be upon him) was considered the master of the global Islamic message; it was necessary for him to be acquainted with what was happening around him in the neighbouring states, and knowing their latest affairs and thus inviting them to Islam.
    And indeed the messenger (God’s peace and blessings be upon him and his family) established his proficiency and skill in external movements through viewing at a distance and personifying the just of the just, and appropriate evaluation of matters as well as outstanding ability in the operation of recruiting to Islam.


    Indeed external relations are key to knowing the international politics surrounding the Islamic State, and alliances should be as a guarantee of force and leverage that the Islamic leadership can use in all its matters with the external world.

    According to sharia politics, the leadership is not allowed to adopt decisions to ally with a state or implement an agreement with it if that violates sharia politics, as agreed on by the majority of ulama [religious scholars] and symbols of jihad. So indeed every agreement must include the following:

    1.The internal sovereignty of the Islamic State and not allowing for other states to intervene in matters of Islamic rule or the general politics of the Islamic State.

    2. Protecting the borders of the Islamic State from every mushrik [idolater], disbeliever, aggressor and even friend, for no army or other force is allowed to enter the borders of the Islamic State whatever the pretext.

    3. A provision that the [Islamic] State should be witness to good treatment of Muslims in its lands and mutual affection with Muslims in other areas of the world, and that it is not allowed to deal with another state that has a history of hostility to Islam’s spread, the building of mosques and oppression of Muslims in its lands.

    4. A provision that the agreement should first be in the interest of the Muslims, not in the interest of the disbelievers.

    5. That the agreement should not include any future provisions touching on the freedom and sovereignty of the Muslim state, and no bonds of debt or conditions of harmful exploitation even if in the future with regards to the matters of the state.

    6. That there should be for the Muslims their rights and freedoms within the state that is to enter into an agreement with us.

    7. That all points of the agreement should be clear to the imam [the caliph] and those with him.

    And in the event of the nullification of any one of the conditions or lack of their provision, it is not allowed for the imam to enter the ummah and the Muslims into dubious bonds that oppress the ummah and the fate of it development.

    Chapter ten - Administration of media

    Indeed everything that I have previously mentioned constitutes practical steps on the ground and [so] there must be a principal means to promote them that should be comprehensive. All of its ideas and activities should be advertised in the interest of the aforementioned practical steps. That will not be realised without media foundations that are branched out and comprehensive in operation within one administration and background. So there should be one media foundation branched out within multiple pockets according to the following outline:

    1. The Base Foundation:

    To be directly affiliated with the Diwan al-Khilafa [office of the caliph] or Majlis al-Shura [advisory council] of whoever so represents them, and the official for it should be connected by his relations with the military commander, [chief] security official and the caliph himself.

    The office will put implement the main media principles and tasks and it should be supervising the distribution of the media offices in the provinces and the media foundations that take a name and are independent from the administration of the provinces [ie so-called auxiliary agencies and foundations mentioned below]. And the Base Foundation defines the priorities of publication and broadcasting as well as the media campaigns, just as it directly supervises through a committee the activities of the offices and undertakes inspection campaigns in the provinces and activist places.
    The foundation also sets the preparation of media staff, their expenses and requirements and receives monthly reports on the activities of every office.

    2. The provincial media

    And in every province there should be a media office affiliated with the governor himself and in coordination with the military and security official in its region, and its director should be in direct contact with the media official in the Base Foundation.
    And among the offices’ tasks are covering the military operations and their results, with issues concluding the end of every great military operation or distinguished operations for the soldiers of the state, as well as services’ facilities, implementing sharia rulings and the course of life in the province. Also the office should be interested in implementing tasks of printing and distribution or supervising them within the province.

    3. Auxiliary agencies and foundations:

    It is suggested that production foundations or auxiliary agencies are established according to the mother office’s needs and interests.
    The auxiliary office specialises in tracking military and services coverage in a province or number of provinces without there being in the name of the foundation or its symbol something to directly link it with the Islamic State.
    The auxiliary foundations are not to be allowed to cover security operations or implementations of [judicial] rulings. These are general suggestions placed for you by the poor slave of God, the servant of the Islamic State, in order to be a lighthouse by which there is guidance, as well as general and prompt systems of organisation. And the administrative cadres will receive training sessions on operating according to the following programme.

    Abu Abdullah al-Masri.

    - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/doc...-translation-below.html/#sthash.Ouus5BFs.dpuf


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Islam110
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:07 pm

    When a very reasonable and factual comment becomes hijacked by the insanity of political correctness and the traitors of western civilization



    Tony Abbott calls for 'religious revolution' inside Islam, defends controversial 2014 budget measures as 'justifiable and right'
    By political reporter Dan Conifer
    Updated about 3 hours agoWed 9 Dec 2015, 10:43am
        
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 6777322-3x2-700x467 

    Photo: The Abbott Government slumped in opinion polls after announcing the 2014 first budget. (AAP: Sam Mooy)


    Related Story: Voters want me to remain in public life, Abbott says
    Related Story: 'Tie the rope around here love': Man's 'bizarre' fridge experience with Tony Abbott


    Former prime minister Tony Abbott has called for a "religious revolution" inside Islam, declaring "all cultures are not equal".


    Key points:



    • Tony Abbott says Muslims must reform Islam
    • Abbott says a tolerant culture is preferable to one that kills in name of God
    • Former PM also defends 2014 budget policies
    • Abbott to further discuss Islam and extremism in speech in Singapore tonight



    In a wide-ranging interview with Sky News, Mr Abbott also defended some of the most controversial measures from the 2014 federal budget, which put forward billions of dollars in cuts from health, education and foreign aid.
    On Islam, he said: "We've got to work closely with live-and-let-live Muslims because there needs to be, as president [Abdel Fattah] Al-Sisi of Egypt has said, a religious revolution inside Islam."
    "All of those things that Islam has never had — a Reformation, an Enlightenment, a well-developed concept of the separation of church and state — that needs to happen.
    "But we can't do it; Muslims have got to do this for themselves. But we should work with those who are pushing in that direction.
    "All cultures are not equal and, frankly, a culture that believes in decency and tolerance is much to be preferred to one which thinks that you can kill in the name of God, and we've got to be prepared to say that."
    Defending the 2014 budget, which saw his government lose ground in opinion polls, Mr Abbott said he would continue to stand by budget policies including the $7 GP co-payment and making unemployed people under 30 wait six months for the dole, along with university fee deregulation and pension indexation changes.
    Media player: "Space" to play, "M" to mute, "left" and "right" to seek.
    Australian Broadcasting Corporation ...
     
    Video: Watch an excerpt of Tony Abbott's interview (ABC News)

    "Now all of these things, I think, were justifiable and right," Mr Abbott said.
    "Obviously, in the circumstances of the aftermath of that budget, they struggled, but nevertheless they were all very defensible policies and I'm happy to continue to defend them."
    Mr Abbott described the Opposition and Senate crossbench as "obdurate", and said they needed to ask themselves why they did not pass the measures.
    "What was so wrong with allowing our universities the freedom that they need to be the best in the world?" he said.
    "What was so wrong with seeking a modest copayment for visits to the GP?
    "What was so wrong with saying that we are going to adjust the indexation method for pensions beyond the next election?"
    Mr Abbott will make a speech in Singapore tonight and will further discuss Islam and extremism.
    He will also meet Singapore's prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong.


    Voters 'overwhelmingly' want Abbott to stay in public life



    The Member for Warringah was ousted by Malcolm Turnbull in September and has since sat on the backbench.
    Tony Abbott said voters "overwhelmingly" wanted him to stay in public life, and gave no indication he wants to retire from politics.
    "I've had literally thousands and thousands of messages of support and encouragement since mid-September," Mr Abbott said.
    "I've had a lot of people talk to me as I get around the electorate and still to some extent around the country and the message that I'm getting from them, overwhelmingly, is that I still have a contribution to make to our public life."
    The ABC understands no pre-selection date has been settled for Mr Abbott's Sydney seat of Warringah.
    Mr Abbott said he hoped future prime ministers continue to spend a week every year in remote Indigenous communities, adding he intended to in 2016.



    Tony Abbott: Turnbull warns against blanket statements after former PM calls for Islam to change

    By political reporters Anna Henderson and Dan Conifer
    Updated 21 minutes agoWed 9 Dec 2015, 1:33pm
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 6692016-3x2-340x227 
    Photo: Malcolm Turnbull says he's 'sure' Tony Abbott and he are on the same page (AAP)



    Related Story: 'Worse than Voldemort': Trump attacked over call for Muslim ban
    Related Story: Tony Abbott calls on Muslims to reform Islam

    Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has warned against blaming all Muslims for the crimes of extremists, after former PM Tony Abbott inflamed debate about a "massive problem within Islam".
    Overnight Mr Abbott called for a "religious revolution" inside Islam and declared: "Cultures are not all equal. We should be ready to proclaim the clear superiority of our culture to one that justifies killing people in the name of God".
    He initially made the comments in a Sky News interview, and backed them up in an opinion column published by News Corp.
    "We've got to work closely with live-and-let-live Muslims because there needs to be, as president [Abdel Fattah] Al-Sisi of Egypt has said, a religious revolution inside Islam," Mr Abbott said.
    "All of those things that Islam has never had — a Reformation, an Enlightenment, a well-developed concept of the separation of church and state — that needs to happen."
    He acknowledged most Muslims "utterly reject terrorism" but also argued that Australians should stop being "apologetic" about their nation's values.
    "It's not culturally insensitive to demand loyalty to Australia and respect for Western civilisation," he said.



    Comments 'grossly disrespectful' to Muslims


    Islamic Council of Victoria spokesman Kuranda Seyit said the comments had caused offence, particularly the suggestion that Islam was culturally inferior.
    "Islam is a religion of decency and has, equally to any other religion in the world, the highest moral standards which we uphold," he said.
    "For him [Mr Abbott] to suggest there is a problem in that area, I think, is grossly disrespectful to the people of Islam and the followers of Islam."
    Speaking on ABC local radio the Prime Minister said Mr Abbott was entitled to his personal opinion.
    "It's a complex area," Mr Turnbull said.
    "Plainly the vast, vast majority of Muslims are as appalled by extremism, and particularly violent extremism, as we are," Mr Turnbull said.
    "The extremism of ISIL or Daesh, these terrorists, is utterly rejected by the leaders of the great majority Muslim nations.
    "The one thing we need to be very careful not to do, and I'm sure Tony agrees with this by the way, what we must not do is play into the hands of our enemies and seek to tag all Muslims with responsibility for the crimes of a few."


    Labor seizes on former PM's comments


    Opposition Leader Bill Shorten called on Mr Turnbull to "pull Tony Abbott into line" and said he was clearly seeking to divide the community.
    "Making assertions about cultural and religious superiority is entirely counterproductive," Mr Shorten said.
    "Inflammatory language undermines efforts to build social cohesion, mutual respect and has the potential to harm the efforts of national security agencies to keep Australians safe."
    Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh said the comments framed Mr Abbott as an "Australian Donald Trump".
    His colleague Ed Husic, Australia's sole federal Muslim MP, echoed the comparison with conservative US-style campaigning and noted what he saw as a broader effort by some to "Trumpify" Australian politics.
    Yesterday Mr Trump, the Republican presidential front-runner, called for a "complete and total shutdown" of Muslims entering the US, claiming there was "great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population".
    His comments drew fire from all sides of the US political spectrum, with everyone from Hillary Clinton to Dick Cheney saying banning a particular religious or ethnic group would go against everything America stood for.


    Topics: government-and-politics, parliament, federal-parliament, australia
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:12 am

    Journalistic Deception in the Mainstream Media

    BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski and Christopher Massie, desperate to defame Trump, libel Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer

    December 8, 2015 6:44 pm By Robert Spencer 40 Comments

    How cravenly dishonest are mainstream media “reporters”? Here’s a case study.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Massie-jpe
    Christopher Massie, who is apparently about 14 years old
    Back on November 23, BuzzFeed’s Christopher Massie contacted me:

    Hi Robert,
    I’m Chris Massie, a reporter with BuzzFeed News. I wanted to ask for your take on Donald Trump’s comments last week and over the weekend on the issues of whether to take in Syrian refugees and on how to treat Muslims in the US.
    Specifically, I’m talking about his call for the surveillance of mosques, his remark that he saw Muslims cheering the 9/11 attacks in New Jersey, and when he said that he’d put in place a database to track Muslims. Trump also said he would send Syrian refugees out of the country if elected.
    Do the policies he’s proposed last week line up with your views?
    I also know you’ve been critical of Trump’s responses to the “Draw the Prophet” contest and also of his unwillingness to answer questions about whether he would uphold the Constitution over Sharia law.
    Did his comments last week change your opinion of him at all? Do you think he would follow up on those ideas if he’s elected?
    If you’d prefer to discuss this by phone, please give me a call at 914-xxx-xxxx.
    Thanks for your help.
    -Chris


    Massie contacted Pamela Geller as well — she writes about her unpleasant experience with this smear artist here. Since Massie was with BuzzFeed, I had a fair idea that Massie was hoping to get something that he could use to try to defame Trump, or Pamela Geller and me, or both, but I decided to answer anyway, and sent him this:

    I’ve called for surveillance of certain mosques for years, as a matter of national security. In April 2013, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, of which I am Vice President, called not just for surveillance, but for the closure of three mosques that have extensive connections to jihad terrorists: the Islamic Society of Boston, the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia, and the Noor Mosque in Columbus, Ohio. Details here: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/04/afdi-calls-for-closure-of-mosques-that-breed-jihad-terror
    The freedom of religion is not a blanket permission to plot sedition and violence. It does not infringe upon the freedom of religion of Muslims for mosques that have demonstrably been involved in jihad terror activity to be put under surveillance.

    I don’t know what Donald Trump saw after 9/11, and cannot comment upon it. Certainly reports that Muslims were publicly celebrating were widespread at the time.
    The database idea is something I have never advocated, and do not support. I believe in the principle of innocent until proven guilty. Even from a practical standpoint, it would be useless, as many jihad plotters have been converts to Islam (Terry Loewen, Christopher Cornell,etc.) who presumably would not be in the database unless they voluntarily registered. Instead of a database of all Muslims, mosques and Muslim organizations should institute transparent and inspectable, honest programs teaching against the understanding of Islam represented by the Islamic State, and teaching against the aspects of Islamic law that conflict with Constitutional values and freedoms.

    The Saudis and the Gulf states are taking no Syrian refugees at all. Why? Because there are jihad terrorists among them. The Islamic State boasted last February that they would soon inundate Europe with 500,000 refugees. The Lebanese Education Minister recently warned that there were 20,000 active jihadis among the Syrian refugees in camps in his country. An Islamic State operative boasted in September, shortly after the migrant influx into Europe began, that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 terrorists had already entered Europe. Consequently, it is unwise in the extreme to take any Syrian refugees.

    Trump’s comments did not change my opinion of him. He is a thoughtless shoot-from-the-hip blowhard who is degrading American politics: the campaign for President as reality TV. Moreover, I don’t support everything he has recently said, as I just explained. I do not believe he would follow up on these ideas if elected. Right now he is pandering to the frustration that many Americans feel over being constantly lied to by the government and by you people in the media about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat. But his remarks after the Garland event show that he has no appreciation of the importance of the freedom of speech, and no understanding of how seriously it is threatened today. We don’t need yet another enemy of free speech in the White House to succeed the man who said, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”


    Massie followed up with questions pressing me about who I did support, but ultimately didn’t run any piece at all. He probably wanted foaming-at-the-mouth irrational “Islamophobia.” Cogent and rational answers surprised and disappointed him, and had to be deep-sixed. But yesterday he surfaced again:

    Hi Robert and Pamela,
    I wanted to ask what you guys think of the statement Trump put out today, where he calls for a “complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the United States. I know both of you were opposed to his earlier calls for a Muslim database on constitutional grounds and this proposal would seem to be even more extreme than that. Do either of you have any thoughts on today’s statement?
    Thanks again for taking the time to discuss this with me.
    -Chris


    Warier this time, I responded:
    What’s the purpose of your inquiry? Are you trying to smear Trump by association with us (as supposed “bigoted Islamophobes”), or find some fissure among foes of jihad terror that you hope to exploit in order to defeat all efforts to stop the advance of jihad terror?

    Massie replied:
    No, I was asking for the same reason as before. Both of you are prominent activists in this field and I’m interested in your thoughts on developments in the presidential campaign, in which Trump is currently a leading candidate. As I said in my last email, even though I didn’t write anything about the last time we spoke, I found your comments interesting, which is why I asked your thoughts again today. I’d still be interested in hearing them, if either or both of you gets a chance.




     Now, over the years I have learned never to trust mainstream media journalists, as they are never honest, never fair, and never interested in portraying resistance to jihad terror in anything but a negative light. But their inquiries always present a dilemma: does one try to get a word in, knowing that they will probably publish something anyway, or reject the corruption of the whole enterprise? I opted to try to get a word in, and sent him this:


    No one has some natural right to enter the U.S. Trump is suggesting a temporary measure, and in view of the intelligence failures involved in Tashfeen Malik’s passing background checks from both the FBI and DHS, and the stated plan of the Islamic State (ISIS) to embed jihadis among the refugees, and the fact that two of the Paris jihadis were recent arrivals into Europe as refugees, it is prudent to call a halt and try to devise some genuinely effective vetting measures — although that will be impossible as long as Obama’s policy of denying the reality of jihad continues. Must our commitment to “multiculturalism” and “diversity” override any concern for national security? Are our elected officials so afraid of being charged with “racism” and “bigotry” that they will remain committed to a program that very likely will result in the entry of more jihad killers into the U.S.? How many Americans must be killed before we consider the security aspects of immigration and the refugee crisis?

    After reading this from me and Pamela Geller’s response (again, here), Massie wrote back:

    Thanks for these responses. Robert, I assure you I have no intention of twisting your words.
    I just want to be clear (so as not to misrepresent your views)–it seems like both of you support Trump’s proposal today? Does this change either of your views of Trump’s candidacy as a whole?

    I answered:
    Unless some reliable way can be discovered to discern jihadis trying to enter the country, I don’t have a particular problem with this. The Islamic State has explicitly instructed its operatives entering the US to appear “moderate” — don’t wear a caftan, don’t carry a Qur’an, don’t wear a beard, don’t go to mosque. Even if there were any sanity in the Administration’s approach to this threat, which there isn’t, the efforts of ISIS members to conceal their allegiances and intentions make vetting well-nigh impossible.
    I will never support Trump for President, even were he to knock on my door, get on one knee, and ask for my vote. I could never support a candidate who advocates kowtowing to violent intimidation and submitting to the Islamic supremacist war against the freedom of speech, as he did after the jihad attack on our event in Garland, Texas.


    And that was that. Here is what they published. Pamela Geller’s screenshot shows that a headline on a similar August piece was even worse: “Top Racists and Neo-Nazis Back Donald Trump.”

    Now they have this: “White Nationalist And Anti-Muslim Fringe Embrace Trump Proposal,” by Andrew Kaczynski and Christopher Massie, BuzzFeed, December 8, 2015:

    A coalition of America’s top white nationalists again praised an initiative from Republican front-runner Donald Trump, this time praising his plan to restrict Muslim immigration to the United States….
    Then follow fifteen paragraphs recounting how people that BuzzFeed characterizes as white supremacists and neo-Nazis support Trump’s proposal. Only after that do Pamela Geller and I come in. The implication is clear: resistance to jihad terror is just another strain of the hatred and racism that manifests itself in white nationalism and neo-Nazism. The fourteen dead bodies in San Bernardino, and the well over a hundred dead bodies in Paris, and the thousands of other victims of jihad terror don’t concern Massie or his accomplice Andrew Kaczynski in the least: in their narrow little hard-Left world, opposing the ideology that incites such hatred and violence is just like being a racist or neo-Nazi.

    Anti-Muslim activists — a distinct group from the white nationalist movement, which has historically directed its racism at blacks and Jews — also embraced Trump’s proposal.

    Note the familiar smear of “anti-Muslim.” Kaczynski and Massie apparently believe that it is “anti-Muslim” to oppose jihad massacres, boasts of imminent Islamic conquest, honor killing, female genital mutilation, the death penalty for leaving Islam, etc. It is they who are thus “anti-Muslim,” as even as they are no doubt that Islam is a religion of peace, they assume, or want their readers to assume, that opposing such things and other elements of Sharia oppression is “anti-Muslim.” Opposing the violent and supremacist jihad doctrine is in reality no more “anti-Muslim” than opposing Nazism was “anti-German.”

    “No one has some natural right to enter the U.S.,” anti-Islam activist Robert Spencer, director of the site Jihad Watch, wrote BuzzFeed News in an email, adding that Trump was suggesting a temporary measure and citing the role of “intelligence failures” in the attacks in San Bernardino, California, and Paris. “Must our commitment to ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘diversity’ override any concern for national security?”
    The anti-Muslim provocateur Pamela Geller also praised the suggestion.

    “Anti-Islam activist.” “Anti-Muslim provocateur.” So standing for the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people before the law is “anti-Islam” and “anti-Muslim.” Here again, in their haste to smear us, Kaczynski and Massie reveal more about their own assumptions about Islam than they do about us.

    “Obama’s negligence and jihad denial necessitates emergency measures. The San Bernardino jihad rampage is a direct result of Obama’s jihad denial,” she said.
    Neither Spencer nor Geller, however, supports Trump as a candidate, because they believe he is not anti-Muslim enough. In particular, both broke with Trump after he denounced as “disgusting” a “Draw the Prophet” event hosted by a group the two founded, which was attacked by two gunmen in May.
    Geller told BuzzFeed News last month that she preferred Ted Cruz, arguing that “Trump doesn’t understand the importance of freedom of speech.”

    Spencer, meanwhile, wrote yesterday, “I will never support Trump for President, even were he to knock on my door, get on one knee, and ask for my vote. I could never support a candidate who advocates kowtowing to violent intimidation and submitting to the Islamic supremacist war against the freedom of speech, as he did after the jihad attack on our event in Garland, Texas.”

    So for Kaczynski and Massie, even standing up for the freedom of speech against violent jihadist intimidation is “anti-Muslim,” such that Trump, in opposing our stand, was “not anti-Muslim enough.” Trump denounced our free speech event that was held in Garland, Texas on May 3. For all his braggadocio about opposing jihad and stopping Muslim immigration, he appears to have no understanding of the necessity of standing up to efforts to bully us into silence and to force us at gunpoint to accept Sharia restrictions on the freedom of speech. Our Garland event was responding to the jihad murders of the Charlie Hedbo cartoonists in Paris. Trump would apparently have us kowtow and submit, and self-censor our words to please Muslims, in the face of those murders.

    But as far as Kaczynski and Massie are concerned, all that just means that we think Trump is not “anti-Muslim enough.” So BuzzFeed excoriates Trump for advocating something that is perfectly Constitutional — stopping Muslim immigration — but is apparently fine with him standing against a core Constitutional principle: the freedom of speech.

    Politely let these “journalists” know on Twitter what you think of their journalistic ethics: @BuzzFeedAndrew and @chrismassie.

    DC: Catholic U in lockdown after "Middle Eastern" man makes "terroristic threats"
    San Bernardino jihad murderer's mother active member of ICNA, a pro-Sharia, pro-caliphate group


    Buzzfeed’s White Supremacist, Fringe Reporters Andrew Kaczynski and Christopher Massie Publish Vile Libel

    @chrismassie @BuzzFeedAndrew
    ByPamela Geller on December 8, 2015

    How the Left Destroys the Nation Left/Islamic Alliance: Media, intelligentsia

    27 Comments - See more at:

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Screen-shot-2015-12-08-at-3-04-20-pm-png


    http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/buz...sie-buzzfeedandrew.html/#sthash.g6vyCWDi.dpuf

    After not getting getting the ugly, perverted rhetoric they were hoping for from us, Buzzfeed published a libel against Robert Spencer and me. Saying I was “historically racist at blacks [outrageous] and Jews” (I am Jewish), Andrew Kaczynski and Christopher Massie of Buzzfeed lumped Robert Spencer and me with the KKK, David Duke and other vile racists. The article, “White Nationalist And Anti-Muslim Fringe Embrace Trump Proposal,” is a new low even for these destroyers. The more jihad, the more leftist tools and Islamic apologists go after the victims.
    First the backstory. Over a week or so ago, Christopher Massie of Buzzfeed called me for comment on a story they were doing on Donald Trump.

    Dear Ms. Geller,
    I’m Chris Massie, a reporter from BuzzFeed News. I wanted to ask for your take on Donald Trump’s comments last week and over the weekend on the issues of whether to take in Syrian refugees and on how to treat Muslims in the US.
    Specifically, I’m talking about his call for the surveillance of mosques, his remark that he saw Muslims cheering the 9/11 attacks in New Jersey, and when he said that he’d put in place a database to track Muslims. Trump also said he would send Syrian refugees out of the country if elected.
    I know that, earlier this year, Trump publicly criticized your “Draw the Prophet” contest and that you wrote that you felt his position on that issue was dangerous. You also criticized him for failing to address immigration to the US by Muslims.
    Did his comments last week change your view of him at all? Do the views he’s expressed line up with yours? Would you trust him to follow through on the ideas he’s suggested if he’s elected?
    If you’d prefer to discuss this by phone, please give me a call at 914-XXX-XXXX

    I answered him (below) and called him (audio here) as well. He tried desperately to get me to come out against Trump.

    Trump is right about mosque surveillance. In April 2013, my American Freedom Defense Initiative called for the closure of three terror-tied mosques: the Islamic Society of Boston, the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia, and the Noor Mosque in Columbus, Ohio. Details here.
    As for the Muslims celebrating in NJ, there were widespread reports on this at the time.
    A Muslim database wouldn’t work. It wouldn’t include converts who are often involved in jihad. And it is wrong: we cannot discard our own principles to defeat this scourge.
    We should take no Syrian refugees at all. Syrian refugees were among the Paris jihadis, and there is no way to vet for them.
    Trump doesn’t understand the importance of the freedom of speech which is why I do not support him.
    I also spent a half hour with Mr. Massie on the phone and recorded the conversation. Here’s the audio:
    Audio Player

    Clearly they didn’t get the Trump-bashing, foaming-at-the-mouth irrational “Islamophobia” they wanted. Cogent and rational answers surprised and disappointed him, and had to be deep-sixed.
    They did not run the article. When I emailed Chris as to why the article did not run, this is what he said:

    Hey. Sorry for not updating you on this. We’ve decided not to do a story for the time being. I was interested to see what you thought of Trump’s post-Paris prescriptions for fighting terrorism and treating Muslims in the US, given that you’ve been critical of him before. I was interested by your answers, but the editors decided not to do anything with it. Still, I appreciate you taking the time to answer my questions and will let you know if anything changes.
    Chris

    Wait it gets better. He emailed me again today and included Robert Spencer in the email as well

    Hi Robert and Pamela,
    I wanted to ask what you guys think of the statement Trump put out today, where he calls for a “complete shutdown” of Muslims entering the United States. I know both of you were opposed to his earlier calls for a Muslim database on constitutional grounds and this proposal would seem to be even more extreme than that. Do either of you have any thoughts on today’s statement?
    Thanks again for taking the time to discuss this with me.
    –Chris

    I emailed Robert and Chris back:
    Robert, I am not sure if you are aware of it but Buzzfeed did not run the last Trump piece they interviewed me for. They didn’t get the smear they wanted. I suspect this won’t run either unless we say something they can pervert.
    The deception continued. Chris responded:

    No, I was asking for the same reason as before. Both of you are prominent activists in this field and I’m interested in your thoughts on developments in the presidential campaign, in which Trump is currently a leading candidate. As I said in my last email, even though I didn’t write anything about the last time we spoke, I found your comments interesting, which is why I asked your thoughts again today. I’d still be interested in hearing them, if either or both of you gets a chance.
    –Chris

    And so I answered him.
    The San Bernardino jihad rampage is a direct result of Obama’s jihad denial. He scrubbed all counter terror materials of jihad and Islam. Obama scrubbed counter-terror programs and materials of jihad and Islam. If you can’t vet for that, intel failures are all but guaranteed. The money train and digital footprint is a stunning Obama’s intel failure.
    Tashfeen Malik was subjected to background checks by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security before she was allowed to enter the country. She passed both. That is a stunning indictment of Obama’s vaunted “vetting process” for the Syrian refugees




    Here is what these urbane savages and defamers ran:



    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Screen-shot-2015-12-08-at-7-21-19-pm-png


    “White Nationalist And Anti-Muslim Fringe Embrace Trump Proposal,”




    By Andrew Kaczynski and Christopher Massie, Buzzfeed, December 8, 2015

    Burning up the fever swamps. A coalition of America’s top white nationalists again praised an initiative from Republican frontrunner Donald Trump, this time praising his plan to restrict Muslim immigration to the United States.

    In what is becoming a fairly routine ritual in a campaign that has seen no shortage of racially-charged rhetoric from the Republican frontrunner, American’s prominent white nationalists again found comfort in a proposal from The Donald.

    “I would not let in any Muslim immigrants at all, from Syria or from anywhere else,” said Jared Taylor, who runs the site American Renaissance (which says that “one of the most destructive myths of modern times is that people of all races have the same average intelligence”), in an email to BuzzFeed News in mid-November.

    “They only cause trouble. Even if they don’t throw bombs, they want special food, won’t work with pork, want special swimming pool hours for women only, etc. Who needs them?” Taylor, unprompted, emailed BuzzFeed News on Monday after Trump’s comments, forwarding the previous comments with addendum, “you saw it here first.”

    Former Klu Klux Klan official and politician David Duke offered his support for Trump’s proposal on his radio program on Tuesday, saying the media is attacking Trump because his comments call into question a U.S. foreign policy pushed by Zionism. “The Jewish knives are coming out on Donald Trump,” Duke said on his radio show of Trump’s comments. “How come it’s against America values to want to preserve the heritage of the country?”

    Duke asked, paraphrasing Trump. “Were overwhelmingly a Christian country and overwhelming a European country.” Trump’s broad call for a ban on Muslim immigration also found praise across the white nationalist web.
    On the Daily Stormer, the white nationalist website which has endorsed Trump, editor Andrew Anglin wrote in a post “Glorious Leader Calls for Complete Ban on All Moslems,” that Trump was the only candidate speaking sense.
    “Why were these monkeys ever allowed in in the first place? What an insane, stupid concept,” he wrote with a link to Trump’s comment. “Finally: Someone speaks sense.” Brad Griffin, who runs the white nationalist blog Occidental Dissent under the pseudonym “Hunter Wallace,” similarly praised Trump.

    “In addition to the Trump database, this should help Trump peel off a lot of the Carson/Cruz vote while sending the Left into a new fit of PC rage that will generate free publicity through Iowa,” wrote Griffin. “That’s great,” Griffin said of Trump’s policy.

    “We need to stop the damage the US government is already doing to places like Minneapolis-St. Paul and Middle Tennessee with the refugee reettlement program. It was revealed today that ISIS is targeting the refugee program to funnel terrorists into the US.” On the white nationalist site VDare.com, Trump’s comments drew rave reviews across the board.

    In one post from editor James Kirkpatrick seeking donations to the site, Trump’s call was cited as proof The Donald was embracing the white nationalist cause. “Even as this is written, Donald Trump has come out for a moratorium on Muslim immigration, just days after our Editor-in-Chief Peter Brimelow advocated precisely the same thing,” wrote Kirkpatrick.

    “They may not admit it, but more people than ever are reading VDARE.com. And finally, people are beginning to act.” In another post, writer Allan Wall called the idea “fantastic.”

    “I am a conservative Evangelical Christian and I think Trump’s idea is fantastic. They don’t have Muslim terrorism in Japan, do they,” he wrote. Anti-Muslim activists — a distinct group from the white nationalist movement, which has historically directed its racism at blacks and Jews — also embraced Trump’s proposal.

    “No one has some natural right to enter the U.S.,” anti-Islam activist Robert Spencer, director of the site Jihad Watch, wrote BuzzFeed News in an e-mail, adding that Trump was suggesting a temporary measure and citing the role of “intelligence failures” in the attacks in San Bernardino and Paris. “Must our commitment to ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘diversity’ override any concern for national security?”

    The anti-Muslim provocateur Pamela Geller also praised the suggestion. “Obama’s negligence and jihad denial necessitates emergency measures. The San Bernardino jihad rampage is a direct result of Obama’s jihad denial,” she said.

    Neither Spencer nor Geller, however, supports Trump as a candidate, because they believe he is not anti-Muslim enough. In particular, both broke with Trump after he denounced as “disgusting” a “Draw the Prophet” event hosted by a group the two founded, which was attacked by two gunmen in May.

    Geller told BuzzFeed News last month that she preferred Ted Cruz, arguing that “Trump doesn’t understand the importance of freedom of speech.” Spencer, meanwhile, wrote yesterday, “I will never support Trump for President, even were he to knock on my door, get on one knee, and ask for my vote.
    I could never support a candidate who advocates kowtowing to violent intimidation and submitting to the Islamic supremacist war against the freedom of speech, as he did after the jihad attack on our event in Garland, Texas.”


    UPDATE: Robert Spencer rips them a new one here.



    See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/buz...sie-buzzfeedandrew.html/#sthash.g6vyCWDi.dpuf
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Wed Dec 09, 2015 2:07 am

    ‘Time Of Looking Away Over’: Germany Warns Saudi Arabia To Stop Funding Wahhabism


    The allegations against Saudi Arabia have been around for some time, but it is rare for a Western politician to speak out against it, as the Gulf State remains a key western ally.
    By RT   |  December 7, 2015


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam AP230363120895
    Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, 2nd right first row, poses with Shura members at consultative Shura Council in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.


    Germany has publicly warned Saudi Arabia against further financing religious radicals globally. German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel’s demand to cut money flowing to the Wahhabis comes as some lawmakers are growing weary of Saudi-funded radical mosques.
    Gabriel stressed that the Saudi regime has been funding mosques known for radicalizing the Muslim population, including in various communities in Europe.
    “We have to make clear to the Saudis that the time of looking away is over,” Mr Gabriel, Merkel’s deputy and the head of the Social Democrats (SPD), told Bild am Sonntag newspaper. “Wahhabi mosques all over the world are financed by Saudi Arabia. Many Islamists who are a threat to public safety come from these communities in Germany.”

    Wahhabism is a strict version of Sunni Islam that is the official religion of the ultra-conservative state of Saudi Arabia. It is also said to be behind Islamic State’s (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) and Al-Qaeda’s extremist ideologies. The Saudis have historically always supported the building of Wahhabi mosques around the world to help the sect gain popularity.
    In response, the Saudi Arabian embassy in Berlin said in a statement that the nation wants to fight the radicalization of youths. “Like Germany, we are part of the anti-Islamic State coalition and fighting side by side against terror,” it said.
    The allegations against Saudi Arabia have been around for some time, but it is rare for a Western politician to speak out against it, as the Gulf State remains a key western ally.


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam CQrmbNDW8AE-H-x
    Saudi clerics call for jihad against Russia in Syria – to back ISIS?
    http://on.rt.com/6t8n  
    1:40 PM - 7 Oct 2015


    The German media has heavily criticized Saudi King for proposing that 200 mosques be built for the Syrian refugees coming to Germany. This issue gained more traction as Saudi Arabia has refused to accept any refugees from Syria.
    The surprisingly open disapproval of Saudi policies comes after a German foreign intelligence agency (BND) report claiming that Riyadh’s foreign relations could be a major destabilizing force in the Arab world.
    Immediately after the report was released, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government attempted to create some distance between the BND analysis and official foreign policy line.
    However, Gabriel’s comments reveal that the government is taking the report’s findings seriously.
    “Of course we need Saudi Arabia to solve the conflicts in the region,” Gabriel said. “We cannot and must not ignore the country. And it does not help to put it in the pillory every day, because that won’t increase its readiness for serious negotiations over Syria.”
    Gabriel is known for being outspoken. When visiting Riyadh earlier this year, he gave a speech in support of Raif Badawi, a Saudi blogger, who was sentenced to 1,000 lashes for insulting Islam. Moreover, Gabriel was responsible for blocking an agreement to build a German arms factory in Saudi Arabia.

     

    German foreign minister’s surprise Iraq visit



    Meanwhile, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier arrived to Baghdad early Monday to a meeting with the Iraqi government, DPA agency reported. The visit had not been announced because of “security concerns.”
    Steinmeier said that Germany is standing by Iraq “in truly difficult and stormy times.” It is expected that the official is going to pledge support to Iraq in the fight against Islamic State.


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam CVYBr9sWIAAx77V
    BREAKING: #Bundestag approves sending 1,200 troops on anti-ISIS 'support' mission in Syria
    http://on.rt.com/6yk1  
    9:40 PM - 4 Dec 2015


    “The stabilization of Iraq is just as important as the search for a political solution in Syria,” the minister said upon arriving.
    The visit comes days after Germany’s Bundestag approved joining the military campaign against IS. Berlin is to send reconnaissance jets, refueling aircraft, a frigate to help protect the French aircraft carrier, and up to 1,200 military personnel to Syria.
    Sanicle
    Sanicle


    Posts : 2228
    Join date : 2011-02-28
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  Sanicle Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:10 am

    shiloh wrote:A Not so 'Radicalised' Unplanned Abberration of Terrorist Islam - Disclosure for the Sheeple, alternative and mainstream

    The Politics of Islam

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Islam110

    Document reveals ISIS plot for world domination in chilling detail: Full translation below

    By Document reveals ISIS plot for world domination in chilling detail: Full translation below ByPamela Geller on December 7, 2015
    - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/doc...-translation-below.html/#sthash.Ouus5BFs.dpuf Pamela Geller on December 7, 2015
    Global Jihad
    23 Comments

    - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/doc...-translation-below.html/#sthash.Ouus5BFs.dpuf

    The report “shows an unprecedented level of sophistication.” Unprecedented? There’s plenty of precedent, from Muhammad on down. Read the document. It’s 24 pages. It is all in the cause Islam, jihad, and Muhammad.
    Anyone who suggests the Islamic State is not Islam is clueless, complicit or evil. A document outlining how ISIS organises the vast territory it controls has been unearthed – and the terror group is far more sophisticated than we feared.
    Then who feared? The liberal lapdogs for Islam? Islamic apologists? I have warned of this — for years.
    A handful (if that) of colleagues, too. We were/are attacked, ridiculed and violently opposed. I was right about it all. So believe me when I tell you, you ain’t seen nuthin yet.

    “ISIS plot for world domination revealed in chilling detail with plans for education and industry,” By Sam Webb, The Mirror, December 7, 2015 The leaked document outlines how the terror group is trying to build a state complete with guidelines for education, natural resources, industry, diplomacy, propaganda and the military

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Sheikh-jalaluddin-training-camp-isis-afghanistan_0052-jpg
    Dossier: An ISIS document has revealed how sophisticated their government is

    A document outlining how ISIS organises the vast territory it controls has been unearthed – and the terror group is far more sophisticated than we feared. The leaked dossier outlines how the terror group is trying to build a state complete with guidelines for education, natural resources, industry, diplomacy, propaganda and the military.
    The 24-page document ‘Principles in the administration of the Islamic State’ gives an incredible insight into the well-funded regime. Written by an Egyptian called Abu Abdullah, outlines how kids must receive “training on bearing light arms”.
    He also calls for a single identity for the terror group to unite both foreigners and locals and makes the case for establishing independent “factories for local military and food production”. The report, which was obtained by the Guardian , shows an unprecedented level of sophistication.
    Charlie Winter, a senior researcher for Georgia State University told the newspaper: “Far from being an army of irrational, bloodthirsty fanatics, IS (Islamic State) is a deeply calculating political organisation with an extremely complex, well-planned infrastructure behind it.”

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Isis2-jpg

    The terror group’s horrific indoctrination techniques were laid bare in a recent propaganda video showing a young boy whose mother was raped and his father killed by ISIS.
    He is being turned into a cold-blooded killing machine by the terror group. The youngster has appeared in a new ISIS propaganda video executing a person in Syria, reports Mosul Eye, a group documenting life in the Iraqi city.
    In a statement, the group said: “ISIS kidnapped this child first thing when it took over Sinjar, and they raped his mother and sisters and killed his father and brother. “He is one in a large group of children that ISIS kidnapped. ISIS turned this innocent child to a killing machine.” Meanwhile, Syria’s government has accused the US-led coalition of launching air strikes on a Syrian army camp that killed three soldiers and wounded 13. The government has sent a protest letter to the UN over the incident, which took place in the country’s east. If confirmed, the air strikes would mark the first time coalition forces fighting ISIS in Syria and Iraq have attacked Syrian government forces.

    The ISIS Papers: 4-page document, translated below, outlines principles for governing territory under the group’s control and strategy for becoming a viable state. Emphasis are mine:

    Islamic State Caliphate on the prophetic methodology
    In the name of God, the compassionate, the merciful:


    “No, by your Lord, they will not believe until they have you rule over them in what they have disagreed and find in themselves from what you have judged and willingly submit.”

    Principles in the administration of the Islamic State – 1435AH [2103-2014]
    Introduction In the name of God, the compassionate, the merciful As for what follows: After 50 years of jihad whose sides have fallen prostrate in the totality of the land, and the states gathered against the centres of the Sunni jihad in the world, God ennobled his true soldiers whom he selected to establish the caliphate state whose fortresses had fallen at the hands of global Zionism in al-Astana [Istanbul] 100 years ago.
    [Note: This is a reference to the end of the Ottoman caliphate in 1924].

    Indeed the establishment of the Islamic State, its concept does not stand on the basis of a mujahid soldier fighting and bearing his arms, nor does it rest on da’wa [evangelising] in a mosque or a street, but rather it is a comprehensive system requiring the leaders of the ummah [Muslim nation] to realise its concepts.

    So on the expansion of the Islamic State, the state requires an Islamic system of life, a Qur’anic constitution and a system to implement it, and there must not be suppression of the role of qualifications, skills of expertise and the training of the current generation on administering the state.
    From the start of the uprising of blessed Syria against the Nusayris [derogatory for Alawites], the mujahideen came in great numbers out of zeal for their religion.

    But some of them harboured Arab nationalist and tribalist arrogance, and others a zeal and will without shari’a aims.
    But it was inevitable that there would be an organisation of these numbers and their principles as a shari’i [Islamically legitimate] organisation accepting the current reality that the world marshalled against it from its soldiers and intelligence services.

    And from then there would be the confrontation of altering the principles and selling out to which the first mujahideen [fighters] did not show deference in Afghanistan, Iraq, Chechnya and elsewhere. And from then there would be the cultivation of educational and societal change with which the muhajireen [immigrants] co-existed and organisation of their ranks with the ansar [natives] – the people of the land.

    And there were many challenges and difficulties that one would have to deal with according to its establishment and according to its special ideological programme, and one must deal with each one of them on an individual basis.

    Chapter one - Announcement of the Islamic Caliphate

    The announcement of the renewal of the caliphate in Iraq in the year 1427AH [2006] was the arbiter between division and separation as well as the glory of the Muslims. That year was tantamount to the hemiplegia for the idolatrous west that began preparing equipment and projects to strike any project of the Islamic State, and the announcement of the caliphate.

    And the announcement of the caliphate was the result of the mujahideen’s realising the lack of advantage in fighting against the idolaters without the existence of a leader and caliph who could gather the Muslims under his banner and be a figure of strength for them.

    America and its allies were able to destroy the caliphate project [ie the Islamic State of Iraq] to a great extent in Iraq after they established the Sunni Iraqi Sahwa forces [Sunni Awakening tribal forces that fought the Islamic State of Iraq] and struck the Sunni nursemaid [ie basis of Sunni support for the Islamic State of Iraq], by portraying it as a treacherous terrorist state of hypocritical political projects, with great marshalling of the media to accomplish that.

    The deeds of the soldiers of the state thus became limited to security operations to strike American targets and their allies. After the arising of the blessed uprising of Syria, the Islamic State had a great role in striking the Nusayris in it and destroying the pillars of the rule of Assad in the heart of the command centres. And it has therefore been the case that the lesson to be learned from the prior leaders of the state is the way to benefit from prior mistakes, and the means to preserve the revolutionaries of Syria on the jihadi trend while not moulding them in a western framework which that western support brings. And in the second chapter is a statement on the administration of the muhajir (foreign) mujahid in particular and developing the creed of the Islamic State among the ansar in Syria.

    The announcement of the caliphate in Syria was a powerful blow that the agents of the west who were set on the direction of the Sahwat of Iraq by whom the west thought that it could put an end to the Islamic caliphate project as it had weakened it in Iraq did not expect.

    There were new modified problems that the leadership of the state was able to deal with, among them [Abu Muhammad] al-Joulani, [Note: the leader of al-Qaida in Syria formerly of Islamic State] announcement of his rejection of joining the Islamic State despite his allegiance to the caliph in Iraq, and in that he was trying to split the ranks and sabotage the project in subordination to his personal agendas bound with regional states, and his rejection was a confrontation for the Islamic project that God gave victory to despite the multitude of those discouraged and the callers to humiliation and servitude.

    And the one who witnesses the events of Syria sees how God has given might to the Islamic State and lowered Joulani and those with him.

    Chapter two - Organisation of the individual and group

    With the entry of the second year of the uprising of Syria, the Shia militias of various nationalities entered Syria to fight at the side of the Nusayri-Rafidite [Assad] regime which flaunted its crimes with regards to the Sunnis, which led to a global Islamic uprising represented in the hijra [migration] of thousands of Muslim youths to fight in the rank of the Sunnis from the various regions of the land.

    Thousands migrated to Syria to fight alongside the mujahideen, without their knowing the direction of any faction, its affiliation or private agendas.

    It was necessary to prepare a sound programme in which the muhajireen might take refuge as their jihad is the result of the glory to Islam and the monotheists. So the announcement of the caliphate was the obligation that gathers those arriving in the land of jihad, strengthens their hearts – and through it their minds are set – and gathers them over the difference of their colours under one banner, one word and one caliph.

    The majority of the first muhajireen came from the Gulf states and the Arabic Maghreb whose zeal for their religion urged them on, and among them were those with zeal for their Arab Sunni brothers without religious jihadist inhibition, and without there being for them prior expertise in global jihadi organisations. After them was hijra [migration] from the states of the world after the announcement of the caliphate, as no disbelieving state has remained which hasn’t also suffered from the hijra [migration] of its youth to support the Islamic State which the soldiers of Joulani and the apostate Sahwa forces from the Free [Syrian] Army and others besides them rejected.

    And after that, Sheikh Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi ordered to establish a first camp which included the new muhajireen [immigrants] who had no deeply ingrained expertise and creed, near the prior borders for the Sykes-Picot “Iraq-Syria” lines.
    And the camp included the organisation of the muhajir [immigrant] individual in the Islamic State and laying aside local tribalism and ignorance before him, and making his affiliation to the religion alone and under one banner. And the camp included nurturing the spirit of the brothers between the muhajireen and the ansar through laying aside the prior identity for the muhajir, and making him a resident in the Islamic State with his family without feelings of estrangement or distinguishing between him and his brothers from the muhajireen and the ansar.

    And without Islam it is not possible for this change to be included which encountered difficulty in the beginning on account of place affiliation that the mujahideen felt on the day of their fight with the Free Army Sahwa and inclinations of nationalism and ethnic division which was making the muhajir lose his zeal to fight alongside them.

    And there resulted from the camp the formation of joint fighting groups between the muhajireen and the ansar established on the basis of the leadership of the individual most capable of bearing responsibility, having prior expertise and the military and sharia [law] tests of the camp.

    And there also resulted from the camp the formation of groups composed of the muhajireen from the western states in particular in view of the difficulty of linguistic communication in the beginning and launch stage and in view of the mutual understanding and precedence of coordination between some of the muhajireen from Chechnya and France to fight in single cells without the existence of any distinction for members from those besides them [ie there was no differential treatment on the basis of ethnic identity].

    And it was inevitable that Arabic character should precede over the character of the muhajireen, for the language of the Qur’an is Arabic, and the prophetic hadiths [sayings] are in Arabic and the customs of Islamic society were Arabic in great part, and in view of the nature of the local society of the peoples of Syria it was inevitable that Arabic character should be cultivated in the language and religious culture in the muhajireen and laying aside the foreign identity that bears in its hidden nature hostility to Islam, its culture and its roots.

    For unifying the life of the mujahid and his language and culture is the guarantor for unifying the rank of the mujahideen and realising their total belonging in the Islamic State that includes muhajireen from every corner of the earth.


    Chapter three - Administration of the camps

    The preparatory camp is the first home and school of the mujahid in which his military and jihadi training sessions take place and he undergoes sufficient education in matters of his religion, life and jihad.
    And according to the plans of the Islamic State to nurture the caliphate generation, the camps are divided into three types:

    1. Continuation camps

    And these are special camps for the mujahideen who lead in the jihad and those who are masters of expertise in managing and planning the battle in beginning and end. And the camp includes physical preparation for 15 days. And that is in a training session every year, and the mujahid through that camp comes upon the latest arts of using weapons, military planning and military technologies currently put forth in battles and weapons whose use by the enemy are anticipated, along with detailed commentary on the technologies of enemy use of the weapons, areas of their use, their strength and how the soldiers of the state can take advantage of them.


    2. First preparation camps

    For the mujahid on the day he joins the Islamic State, whether as a muhajir or from the ansar: and the camp includes sharia sessions through which the mujahid studies the fiqh [jurisprudence] of the rulings, Islamic doctrine, al-wala’ and al-bara’ [loyalty and disavowal], in addition to the arts of fighting and the arts of using weapons, with screening of every mujahid in a specialty in which he excels and completing his camp according to his skill in specific weapons.


    3. Preparation camp for children

    The camp includes sharia sessions in fiqh of doctrine and rulings, with special sessions in Islamic society and manners, and training on bearing light arms and the principles of use.
    Outstanding individuals are selected from them for security portfolio assignments, including checkpoints, patrols and the various Amniyat units [internal security units].
    And the camps administration is responsible for planning, aims and results, and as the results of the camp should be in alignment with the aims and principles of the Islamic State, it has been necessary to establish a centre for the administration of the camps whose tasks are as follows:

    1. Preparing special sharia sessions in the camps in coordination with the al-Buhuth and al-Eftaa [fatwa – legal opinion] committee.
    2. Preparing educational programmes to teach the Arabic language and recitation of the Qur’an in coordination with the Diwan al-Ta’aleem [department of education] for every province.
    3. Preparing military programmes teaching the types of weapons and military tactics with the supervision of the military commander in every province.
    4. Studying expenditures and allowances for every camp whose study and analysis are to be completed by the military leader or wali [governor] of every area according to the needs connected with every wilaya [province] and submitting the study to the wali.
    5. Overseeing the selection of the educational and training staff in the camp.
    6. Putting in place detailed planning and programmes on the course of the battle.
    7. Tracking the supervision of the camp according to the defined programmes.
    8. Assessing the camp session and raising a report to the officials concerning the readiness of the session after the camp.

    Chapter four - Direction administration

    The mujahid [soldier] remains in need of direction and tracking after his completion of the special training session for him, for spiritual direction is the foundation of his success in every matter he undertakes and the mujahid’s direction in every stage will consist of reminding him of the aims of the Islamic State and hadiths [prophetic sayings] on the virtue of the mujahid and persevering and continuing despite the difficulty of the path of jihad.

    1. Direction before the battle

    And here the military commander for the mission or the sharia official accompanying him should undertake it, and the direction should be a little before the launching of the mujahid to battle through mentioning hadiths on the virtue of jihad and endurance on encountering the enemy as well as following the decisions and instructions of the field commander during the battle, along with the virtue of martyrdom in the path of God to raise the banner of Islam and the caliphate and the virtue of the one struck with wounds in the land of the battle. All this should be done during the readying and preparation for the battle. And the director oversees the mujahideen in all their moments until their absence from him in the battle. And the director should not be discouraged, having doubts, hesitating or cowardly because he is the example that the mujahid summons whenever the furnace of the battle flares up.

    2. Direction after the battle:

    In the event of victory, the director summons what came from the Prophet from sayings on the virtue of the mujahid and their feelings that what they have accomplished aspires to be in the service of their religion and creed, with their being reminded to embrace the instructions coming from the battle leadership from the rulings of spoils and not adopting any decision to plunder the wealth of the people except by its rights and by explicit order from the commander responsible. In the event of being broken, the direction should be on patience, reckoning and steadfastness on meeting the enemy while not heeding those having doubts and those who spread rumour and terror in the ranks of the soldiers.

    3. Lasting direction:

    Remaining on activity and steadfastness with the mujahid in all his states and lessons in al-wala and al-bara [loyalty and disavowal] as well as fiqh, Islamic creed and listening to and obeying the amir [leader]. The staff of direction in every province should be from the cream of the crop of free sharia and military officials who have the ability to argue, convince and encourage as well as from the soldiers around whom the group have congregated and should be possessors of confidence among them.

    Chapter five - Organisation of the provinces

    The Sykes-Picot agreement and after them the indirect rule of the west over the states of Islam tried to place administrative borders drawing social, madhhabist and ethnic differences in every region, and deepening the roots of the differences between the Sunni Muslims. Thus the distinction of the Sunnis from the Shia in the provinces of Iraq and oversight of the centres of administration in every Sunni region, and even the appointment of officials in the Sunnis’ regions from the filth of the Rafidites have been clear, while the regions have been entrusted under the rule of [their own] Kurdish and Shia sects independent in decision-making from the ruling presidency as we have seen in Kirkuk and Irbil and in even smaller regions including from them in the cursed Najaf and Karbala and that have enjoyed “religious” administrative independence, unannounced. All those divisions have also forbidden the Sunnis from the simplest of their rights while making the Nusayris masters of the sea, and the Shia in Iraq the kings of oil and the merchant pathways, and the Yazidi Kurds the sheikhs of the mountains while the Druze have become masters over the mountains overseeing Israel. All that has not merely been a coincidence, but it was a dirty political decision in order to implement a tightening stranglehold on the Sunnis and make them the most remote people and strip them of all assets for advancement or thinking of a rightly-guided Islamic State. If we were to see today the borders of the Islamic State and the borders of the Sunnis regions, we would see them torn apart, besieged and persecuted, for there are the Shia from the south of Iraq, the Nusayris from the west of Syria and the communist Kurdish parties to their north, and the Druze to their south. So it is no surprise that today we see the bloodshed flowing in the land of Syria and Iraq. So it has been from the law and sound mind to redraw the borders of the provinces and give lengthy consideration to every development that occurs in the region. Thus we protect the power of the Sunnis and strengthen its expansion and focal points, and then special teams can be deployed for fundamental change in the structuring of the regions that are subject to the rule of the Islamic State. And that was what the companions [of the Prophet Muhammad] and after them the caliphs pursued against every heretic community: that is, dispersing their groupings so there no longer remained any impeding opinion, strength or ability, and the Muslim alone remains the master of the state and decision-making and no one is in conflict with him. And in what there is no doubt is the fact that among the assets of the ummah [Islamic nation] are: its wealth, the nature of its land, its inhabitants and its water. And in everything is distinction:

    1.Wealth of the state

    It is the principal component and source of financing for all internal and external operations, and the existence of secure financial resources whose value does not change in every time and place is a must – and the need of the people for them should be clear with the nations unable to do without them despite the existence of the impediments that prevent their use and purchase from the land of the state.
    This includes oil and gas and what the land possesses including gold as currency that does not deteriorate or decline, as well as trade routes from which they have no wealth and all of it should be the intervention of the Islamic State as a powerful side in all their plans and such that they cannot pretend that it has no existence and might.

    2. The nature of its land

    The state cannot remain without the existence of the land that allows for its continuation and expansion, for the assets of the land are – the mountains, the agricultural lands, the sea and the river – for these natural assets are what makes the Islamic State acquire its importance and the importance of location, and the agreement of the west in Sykes-Picot were established on the basis of depriving the Sunnis from those assets, as the mountains were granted to the Kurds, Druze and Alawites, while the sea was granted to the Rafidites and Nusayris, while the river and what surrounds it in investment for the Jews and the agricultural lands under their administration. And that was a new setback that was added to all the ambitions in establishing the Islamic State and freeing it from servitude of the filthy Nusayris and the disbelieving Rafidites [Alawites and Shia]. When there is no asset for them the enemy have been shut on their openings from every side.

    3. The traitorous governments have tried to mislead the Sunni peoples in every Arab land, as corrupt programmes were introduced for them and there spread among them the love of vice, bonds, bribery, usury and abandoning worship and forgetting the rulings of jihad. So the Sunnis in Syria have lived in a new ignorance after ignorance during the French occupation of their land as there was the Alawite government that planted its vices in every house, permitted the forbidden and made forbidden development and civilisation.

    But after the uprising undertaken by the Sunnis in Iraq and Syria and their getting rid of the servitude to the tyrants began the second plan that requires implementing the “demographic” change in their regions and expelling the Sunnis from their areas, for it has been what we saw in Fallujah, Aleppo, Homs, Tikrit and other areas besides them from the regions of the Sunnis many of whose people have suffered during their presence in their land.

    Indeed they realise that the Islamic State cannot renew the ummah’s blood without a human member capable of always producing, and there was the alluring of the best of its youth and plundering the land with hijra outside their areas and liquidating many of them.

    And today it is necessary to have a studied plan that responds in kind and brings about like change in the profane abode of disbelief, expelling its people and killing its people until there is no base for them and the land is for God and his servants.

    And in turn implementing the plans that include the return of the Muslim youth to their land and bringing together the skills from the land of the Muslims, and the going out of the state for specialised staff in their fields if they are not of those of the pact in Islam [ie Jews and Christians].

    Chapter six - Administration of wealth

    Indeed the might of the Islamic State can only be through its being free entirely from all bonds of tyranny that the west possesses as means of leverage against it, and it moves them according to its need and whim based on knowing from it the need of the mujahideen for support, wealth and weapons.
    Jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria have lived through long bonds of humiliation pledged on conditional western support, until they seized wide areas of the land and possessed all assets of advancement. And all of that is on account of the ignorant administration that controls them and keeps them under western guardianship for all their activities, wars and expansion.

    Indeed the Islamic State’s seizure of vast areas includes all assets of advancement that does not suffice without the existence of an administration managing the interests and managing the crises. So it is necessary for a plan to be put in place including the might of the state and its independence as we specify in the following points:
    – Preserving the capabilities [personnel and infrastructure] that managed the production projects under the prior governments, whilst taking into account the need to place strict oversights and an administration affiliated with the Islamic State.
    – Placing specialists in accounting and oversight over all production directorates in the Islamic State including establishments of oil, gas, archaeological areas and factories for manufacturing and production.
    – Preserving additional reserves that ensure the continuation of operation in one successive arrangement in all circumstances.
    – Regulating expenses through a comprehensive administration including collective expenses and collective production without singling out a province or group by provision of estimates exceeding their needs in normal circumstances.
    – Establishing factories for local military and food production and independence from the monopoly of arms dealers for materials of necessity and cutting them off in the event of contravening the interests.
    – Realising local needs and providing for them within the borders of the state in isolated safe zones and connecting trade routes inside the state through principal centres and beneficiary wings.
    – Reducing excess expenditure through the administration of the province; it must operate independently and be able to take its own decisions in matters concerning the province.
    – Relying on external business as a principal source of income through the openings of the state to the other side without an intermediary. Direct exchange has better guarantees than the monopoly of the intermediary for business transactions and means of connection.

    Chapter seven - Administration of the projects

    In parallel with military preparation in the lines of fighting and the camps, a committee is to be put in place to administer production projects and put in place plans to implement new investment projects. The one who invests in the lands of the state is to be given comprehensive protection according to the agreement that arises with the observance of the interests of the Islamic State in production, exporting and prices. The independence of the investor from the administration of the province is a more preferred means for the administration of the wealth, increasing local production and improving the capability of the producing material, and regulating the time and expenditure.

    And it will [also] be a better guarantee against losses resulting from any sizeable investment project. Advertisement For the independent foundation is outside the limits of liability that arise for those projects that are affiliated with a province of the Islamic State. And it is not right for the investor according to the law, to hand over the production to those who have no right to it and they [those who have the right to it] are the ones determined in an agreement by the administration that is entrusted over the project and overseeing its organisation by the province in which the project is established. And such an agreement is stipulated on determining the beneficiaries and the means of profit with the guarantee of the [Islamic] State to convey the products internally to the borders of the Islamic State without exposing them to any risk. And it is not allowed to invest in the following projects:

    1. Oil products

    It is not allowed for a person who has no pledge of allegiance on his neck to the caliph to invest in an oil or gas field or what has arisen from their trajectory, but it is allowed besides that to produce derivatives after buying the crude products from the fields of the Islamic State, just as it is allowed to sell and deal in them inside and outside the state.

    2. Gold and antiquities

    It is not allowed to excavate for gold and antiquities except by expressed agreement from the resources department, and all transferred and stored materials will be confiscated for the interest of the treasury. And it is allowed to deal in gold not excavated from the ground according to the well-known aharia frameworks with immediate effect.

    3. Weapons

    It is forbidden to establish factories to produce weapons and materials particular to them without granting of any explicit permits for the situation, just as it is forbidden to establish shops to sell public weapons besides personal weapons and deal in them without prior knowledge and agreement from the responsible military amir in the wilaya. As for the other principal goods that also come under the crux of people’s lives, the officials must know about all means of operation and production like dealing in water, flour and livestock.


    Chapter eight - Administration of education

    Education is the foundation upon which Islamic society is built, and it is the division that makes the Muslims differ in their lives from the rest of the paths of disbelief. The previous Ba’athist and Shia governments tried to deviate the Muslim generation from their path through their educational programmes that concord with their governments and political whims. The programmes focused on glorifying the ruling authorities and discarding differences between sects, stripping Sunnis of their identity. And among the most important of their goals were:

    1. Focusing on glorifying and eternalising the leaders and taking refuge in God and inserting them into hidden shirk [idolatry] through immortalising ephemeral, temporary personalities.

    2. Spreading the aims of their parties and their ideas whilst distancing the nurtured from Islamic thought, because the ruling party considers itself the pulse of society and the symbol of its endurance, while Islamic principles are for the mosque only and between man and his Lord with severe proceedings against all those who tried to do away with party thinking or modify it.

    3. Discarding the difference with the disbelieving sects, and considering co-existence with them as the true societal bond that the ummah must operate in accordance with in order to preserve its goals, while in reality protection is implemented for the rights of all the communities of disbelief while oppressing the Sunnis and their principles.

    4. Spreading the culture of moral dissolution by promoting it through expressions of civilisation and exchanges of cultures with the west.

    And thus it was that the ummah entered into labyrinths of confusion that made it forget its glory, its strength and its past, while the prior Islamic caliphates were portrayed as being a foreign occupation that arose on the basis of ignorance and the decline of the ummah and nationalism.

    – And among the aims of the Islamic programme in the Islamic State:

    1. Implanting Islamic values in society as well as sound, sharia-based societal manners and customs.

    2. Correcting the erroneous narrations that the prior programmes had implanted about the prior caliphs and imams.

    3. Developing Islamic society on the basis of manners and on sharia.

    4. Raising a knowledgeable Islamic generation capable of bearing the ummah and its future without needing the expertises of the west.

    So it is also that the Islamic school is one of the houses of worship, whose aims are confined to acquiring knowledge also, but also it is an educational nurturing ground that raises the individual with comprehensive development of mind and body.
    And in it there should be training facilities for mind, body and vocation, as successful programmes cannot rely on what is written between the lines, without practical training on all given subjects.
    Also it is the case that the interest in the Arabic language and its use in daily life for the individual is an important matter in the Islamic State as is distancing from vulgar expressions that were put forward in society in a well-considered plan to guarantee the forgetting of the Islamic identity for society.

    Chapter nine - Administration of relations

    External relations are the first foundation for building every nascent state, and they are among the foundations that show the strength and might of the state. They should constitute for it a general stance in everything that happens in the world with the people of Islam and be for it an external hand protecting its dealings.

    And the Prophet (peace be upon him) was considered the master of the global Islamic message; it was necessary for him to be acquainted with what was happening around him in the neighbouring states, and knowing their latest affairs and thus inviting them to Islam.
    And indeed the messenger (God’s peace and blessings be upon him and his family) established his proficiency and skill in external movements through viewing at a distance and personifying the just of the just, and appropriate evaluation of matters as well as outstanding ability in the operation of recruiting to Islam.


    Indeed external relations are key to knowing the international politics surrounding the Islamic State, and alliances should be as a guarantee of force and leverage that the Islamic leadership can use in all its matters with the external world.

    According to sharia politics, the leadership is not allowed to adopt decisions to ally with a state or implement an agreement with it if that violates sharia politics, as agreed on by the majority of ulama [religious scholars] and symbols of jihad. So indeed every agreement must include the following:

    1.The internal sovereignty of the Islamic State and not allowing for other states to intervene in matters of Islamic rule or the general politics of the Islamic State.

    2. Protecting the borders of the Islamic State from every mushrik [idolater], disbeliever, aggressor and even friend, for no army or other force is allowed to enter the borders of the Islamic State whatever the pretext.

    3. A provision that the [Islamic] State should be witness to good treatment of Muslims in its lands and mutual affection with Muslims in other areas of the world, and that it is not allowed to deal with another state that has a history of hostility to Islam’s spread, the building of mosques and oppression of Muslims in its lands.

    4. A provision that the agreement should first be in the interest of the Muslims, not in the interest of the disbelievers.

    5. That the agreement should not include any future provisions touching on the freedom and sovereignty of the Muslim state, and no bonds of debt or conditions of harmful exploitation even if in the future with regards to the matters of the state.

    6. That there should be for the Muslims their rights and freedoms within the state that is to enter into an agreement with us.

    7. That all points of the agreement should be clear to the imam [the caliph] and those with him.

    And in the event of the nullification of any one of the conditions or lack of their provision, it is not allowed for the imam to enter the ummah and the Muslims into dubious bonds that oppress the ummah and the fate of it development.

    Chapter ten - Administration of media

    Indeed everything that I have previously mentioned constitutes practical steps on the ground and [so] there must be a principal means to promote them that should be comprehensive. All of its ideas and activities should be advertised in the interest of the aforementioned practical steps. That will not be realised without media foundations that are branched out and comprehensive in operation within one administration and background. So there should be one media foundation branched out within multiple pockets according to the following outline:

    1. The Base Foundation:

    To be directly affiliated with the Diwan al-Khilafa [office of the caliph] or Majlis al-Shura [advisory council] of whoever so represents them, and the official for it should be connected by his relations with the military commander, [chief] security official and the caliph himself.

    The office will put implement the main media principles and tasks and it should be supervising the distribution of the media offices in the provinces and the media foundations that take a name and are independent from the administration of the provinces [ie so-called auxiliary agencies and foundations mentioned below]. And the Base Foundation defines the priorities of publication and broadcasting as well as the media campaigns, just as it directly supervises through a committee the activities of the offices and undertakes inspection campaigns in the provinces and activist places.
    The foundation also sets the preparation of media staff, their expenses and requirements and receives monthly reports on the activities of every office.

    2. The provincial media

    And in every province there should be a media office affiliated with the governor himself and in coordination with the military and security official in its region, and its director should be in direct contact with the media official in the Base Foundation.
    And among the offices’ tasks are covering the military operations and their results, with issues concluding the end of every great military operation or distinguished operations for the soldiers of the state, as well as services’ facilities, implementing sharia rulings and the course of life in the province. Also the office should be interested in implementing tasks of printing and distribution or supervising them within the province.

    3. Auxiliary agencies and foundations:

    It is suggested that production foundations or auxiliary agencies are established according to the mother office’s needs and interests.
    The auxiliary office specialises in tracking military and services coverage in a province or number of provinces without there being in the name of the foundation or its symbol something to directly link it with the Islamic State.
    The auxiliary foundations are not to be allowed to cover security operations or implementations of [judicial] rulings. These are general suggestions placed for you by the poor slave of God, the servant of the Islamic State, in order to be a lighthouse by which there is guidance, as well as general and prompt systems of organisation. And the administrative cadres will receive training sessions on operating according to the following programme.

    Abu Abdullah al-Masri.

    - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/doc...-translation-below.html/#sthash.Ouus5BFs.dpuf


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Islam110

    Thanks for posting this Shiloh. It's always good to get an insight into the mind and plans of a predatory herd, regardless of which religious banner they adopt to justify their need to satisfy their own lust to dominate others.
    Sanicle
    Sanicle


    Posts : 2228
    Join date : 2011-02-28
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  Sanicle Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:47 am

    Ha, I just had a thought.  Maybe throwing the spotlight on the Western World as being the prime movers behind establishing the NWO had all been smoke and mirrors .... disinfo.  Maybe the plan has always been to get a group like ISIS together to carry it out, including establishing Sharia Law worldwide.  Thatd get all us pesky females back in line too, wouldn't it Question Wink
    orthodoxymoron
    orthodoxymoron


    Posts : 13425
    Join date : 2010-09-28
    Location : The Matrix

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  orthodoxymoron Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:43 am

    Perhaps bad and stupid people require bad and stupid management. Actually, that might be good management in a bad way. Do you see what I mean?? If we had open and honest management with high ethical and intellectual standards -- things might REALLY go to hell. That's a scary thought, isn't it?? "Beam me up Scotty!!"
    Sanicle
    Sanicle


    Posts : 2228
    Join date : 2011-02-28
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  Sanicle Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:15 am

    Do you think Scotty would let me come too Oxy? I love you
    Jenetta
    Jenetta


    Posts : 1978
    Join date : 2010-04-16
    Location : British Columbia Canada

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty The Reporting Of Information Of Events Associated With Islam

    Post  Jenetta Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:08 pm


    Exactly Sanicle...my feeling is that the Zionists and Sharia/Islamic Law supporters (ISIS) are in collusion with one another dead center. The fringe groups extreme right and left antagonize the issues. The Zionists and Caliphate supporters play off the extreme right and left against each other (Islamphobes(Trump) & those who welcome the refugees with open arms. Anti-semitism, fear and hatred, non-acceptance of multiculturism are useful tools to those who want to see an Islamic Caliphate globally or a New World Order par excellence courtesy of the Vatican/Zionists.
    _______________________________________________
    As it is below; so it is above



    Sanicle wrote:Ha, I just had a thought.  Maybe throwing the spotlight on the Western World as being the prime movers behind establishing the NWO had all been smoke and mirrors .... disinfo.  Maybe the plan has always been to get a group like ISIS together to carry it out, including establishing Sharia Law worldwide.  Thatd get all us pesky females back in line too, wouldn't it Question Wink
    orthodoxymoron
    orthodoxymoron


    Posts : 13425
    Join date : 2010-09-28
    Location : The Matrix

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  orthodoxymoron Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:53 pm

    I don't know, Sanicle. We might not like it onboard!! "Elsewhere" doesn't necessarily equal "Better". I don't mean to be preachy BUT I think we need to think long and hard about the concept of "HEAVEN" regardless of whether we believe in God and Heaven -- or not. I get the sinking-feeling that people want a God who does what THEY tell Him and/or Her to do -- rather than God telling them what to do (regardless of whether they like it, or not). Are there elections in "Heaven"?? Can one be insubordinate to God -- and live to tell about it?? I get the sinking-feeling that the Real-Deal God has not been running the show in this solar system for a very long time OR that the Real-Deal God Farmed-Out the Nasty-Task of Running (what often seems to be) a Prison-Planet in Rebellion. I suspect that all governments and religions ultimately answer to One Central Authority. The Atheists and Agnostics might be correct in noting the absence of an All-Powerful -- Omni-Present -- Omniscient -- Almighty-God. One might exist -- but they don't seem to be particularly visible and active in this portion of the galaxy. I honestly do NOT intend disrespect to the Real-Deal or Proxy-God. I'm simply trying to understand our predicament. What if God was Deposed and/or Taken-Hostage in Antiquity?? If so, what if this was a move calculated to Save Humanity from Extinction?? I realize that doesn't make a lot of sense -- but I'm suggesting a very complex and nasty solar-system history for all-concerned. When I told the "Ancient Egyptian Deity" that I wished the best for "All-Concerned" -- they questioned that claim. They thought that "People Deserved to Die". Unfortunately, they wouldn't tell me the "Whole-Story". I continue to "Fly-Blind". People seem to believe and do just about anything to "Gain Heaven" and "Avoid Hell" regardless of how ridiculous and/or unethical it might be. Objectivity and Honesty seem to get "tossed out the window". Reasoning with a True-Believer is often interpreted as "Attacking God and Religion". People tighten-up, circle the wagons, and prepare for a Holy-War. Speaking of which, I think at least one faction of the PTB want a Final Holy-War (possibly to "cleanse the sanctuary"). We presently seem to be in the eye of some sort of storm. Perhaps the Angels are Holding-Back the Four-Winds of Strife (at least until some sort of False-Messiah artificially-rises and subsequently falls flat on their face). I think most significant things are planned and staged by the PTB (for better or worse, I know not). A reprehensible secret-government might've been absolutely-necessary historically -- but I hope we can move on to bigger and better things (sometime soon). Hope Springs Eternal.
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:23 pm

    Sanicle wrote:
    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 369-77

    Ha, I just had a thought.  Maybe throwing the spotlight on the Western World as being the prime movers behind establishing the NWO had all been smoke and mirrors .... disinfo.  Maybe the plan has always been to get a group like ISIS together to carry it out, including establishing Sharia Law worldwide.  Thatd get all us pesky females back in line too, wouldn't it Question Wink

    'Pesky Females?'

    Are you and Jenetta and Priscilla and Burgundia and Josephine and Brook and Mudra and Carol and Susan 'Pesky females'?
    In many ways you certainly are, especially when it addresses information you are not too familiar with.
    However, but you for one have missed the point about a 'real' and not a 'right-wing' or 'left-wing' or 'center-corpus political' danger to 'your rights' and your 'freedom of speech and self expression' rather pertinently.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Bird-jpg

    No matter the narrative of information you  'pesky females' might encounter and data you often dismiss as not being applicable to your own individual situation and perspective; nevertheless you might have 'friends in strange and weird places' who have your 'best interests' at heart, even without you yourself knowing what 'your most favourable outcomes' might be.

    Your irony aside though, yes the well known platform of the 'alternative information' HAS been hijacked by BOTH parties, the misnomed 'Zionist conspirators' related to 'banksters' and 'elitists' as well as the 'Anti-Zionist' or the 'enemies of the ptb/nwo' and the like.
    So really 'Icey princess of the elements', you are caught between two hard rocks within an enclave or grotto from which there is no escape in the metaphysical sense, except in a form of 'fighting' the slumbering mind with your awakening mind and this is not in any way nabs related. Dragon kisses for you in this dilemma.





    THANK YOU ISLAM FOR ALL YOU’VE DONE FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS!

    Women have the right to wear a sheet covering their entire body or risk rape or acid thrown in their face.
    Women get to pick from the many shades of black for their Burka, Abaya or Jalbeeb.
    Women have the right to have male escorts whenever they leave their house or risk rape or arrest
    Women have the right to genital mutilation. Then they have the right to get sewn up so they can’t hardly piss.
    Women have the right to have 4 male witnesses to testify she was NOT raped
    Women have the right to have their hand cut off for using a cell phone in public
    Women have the right to be honor killed
    Women have the right to be forced to become human incubators for future terrorists.
    Women have the right to be stoned to death for the crime of NOT being able to produce 4 male witnesses in the case of adultery
    Women have the right to be treated like shi20 by their husband, their children and just about any muslim man
    Women have the right to get beat with a chair because they got their husband angry.
    Women have the right to be married off at ANY age to ANY man (most likely their first cousin)  their father SELLS them to.
    Women have the right to get only half of what their brother gets of an inheritance.
    Women have the right to obligatorily have another woman assist them at testifying in court, because their minds are too feeble and only half as good as a man's.
    Women have the right to not report rape, sodomy, incest, assault in Islamic countries because these crimes are never recorded by officials and not used in statistics.
    Married girls have the right to walk themselves to one of the many Obstetric Fistula Clinic (Only available in Islamic countries) where they can get the hole between their vagina and urethra repaired, after being raped at too young an age by their husband.
    Married girls have the right to go to Jannah early when they die in childbirth because their immature bodies can't handle pregnancy.
    Women have the right to share their husband’s earnings with up to 3 more women.
    Women have the right to a divorce, in a sharia court, after they obtain a lawyer to represent them, and only if their husband agrees, (Otherwise they can just hope their husband utters the words "i divorce you" thrice)
    Women have the right to have traffic stopped in the middle of a Saudi street intersection, so they can be quickly decapitated in said intersection for suspected witchcraft.
    Women and girls have the right to be traded as war booty sex slaves if their family belongs to the losing side of any battle started by men.
    Women and girls have the right  to be sexually harassed and groped, in the streets and in broad daylight, if any man or boy thinks her female form isn't concealed enough
    Women or girls have the right to be buried chest deep in a pit and pelted with stones until they die if they are suspected by their husbands of infidelity.
    Women used to have the right to suicide to escape the ecstasies of islam until Suicide amongst women was at record highs in Iran and a Mullah enacted a fatwa to prevent further suicides...
    "Any woman who commits suicide will have her daughters executed"
    This has stopped many unappreciative women from leaving the most perfect religion in the world.
    And women’s rights even extend to Janna where virgins have the right to work in a heavenly whorehouse where they can be abused in every way possible by muslim men and then their merciful and most beneficent pimp, alla, turns them back into virgins so the next muslim man can make them bleed and hear them scream. And they don’t even get paid whore wages.


    Now where oh where are the 'politically corrected' multicultural feminists of the western civilization?
    Ah I forgot, the 'same sex marriage' and the sexploitation of the 'Hollywood Industry', the Kardashian attires and body things and the Zionist conspirators are keeping the ardent defenders of 'women's rights' a little preoccupied!


    Daniel 11:36-38 - King James Version (KJV)
    36 And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
    37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
    38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.






    And now something rather different!
    A TRUE Moderate Muslim with a fake disguise versus a FAKE Moderate Muslim without a fake disguise and a sheik aka 'islamic scholar' - no other 'western' input religious or secular required​

    [3:04:44 AM-December 10th, 2015] susan lynne  schwenger: the trump stuff - is; being done to push people in the direction of  hell-ary clinton
    [10:29:32 AM] ShilohaPlace: I can agree with that in parts  Susan, but it is far more serious than that. Look what just happened?
    Saudi Arabia, UAE, Pakistan etc just 'banned' trump products from their countries as a protest to brainwash the moronic west with their 'holy indignation' of course
    It is all a well thought out plan to undermine your western culture and replace it with sharia barbarisms
    Those moronic looney leftist newspapers in London have ganged up to ban Trump from even going to the UK right
    All he said was watch the muslims and temporary don't let them enter without decent background checks
    Just common sense more so then anything else, and I am not a trump supporter lol; he is rather nutty in many things but here he is right

    [10:33:50 AM] raxnae: luckily i live in redneck country were they don't take too kindly to A-rabs and muslims lol
    [10:33:59 AM] ShilohaPlace: Indeed, rednecks are good for something after all, even if they are stuffed up otherwise
    [10:34:36 AM] raxnae: yeah for once their rascist ways come in handy
    [10:34:54 AM] ShilohaPlace: This is not racist rax. Islam is not a race it is politics and militant at that. I dont hate muslims, they are victims of their belief in the 'devil'
    [10:35:30 AM] raxnae: well more like xenophobia lol
    [10:35:45 AM] ShilohaPlace: Any muslim resisting anything Islam is no longer a muslim; this people dont understand.: 80% of muslims are not Arabs
    [10:36:32 AM] raxnae: yeah they are apostates, worse than christians and jews and non believers lol

    [10:36:37 AM] Sirius 17: https://www.facebook.com/Pasobaby/posts/10153761990764496?comment_id=10153762537994496&notif_t=comment_mention

    [10:36:39 AM] ShilohaPlace: Arabic muslims are the Islamic State wahabanism
    [10:36:42 AM] Sirius 17: can you see this ?
    [10:36:56 AM] raxnae: nope
    [10:37:24 AM] ShilohaPlace: nope

    [10:37:51 AM] Sirius 17: https://www.facebook.com/RedBlackAnarchism/photos/a.614587651985753.1073741827.614585718652613/794970300614153/?type=3&fref=nf





    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Naziis10

    Ray Barrera Just replace the group you want to speak against with an oppressed minority. If you sound like an Xxxxxxx, you probably are.

    Like · Reply · 41 · December 7 at 7:04pm


    Ray Barrera Just replace the group you want to speak against with an oppressed minority. If you sound like an Xxxxxxx, you probably are.


    Like · Reply · 41 · December 7 at 7:04pm

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 12088460_10153721968169917_396939407317161677_n

    Garrett Smith These are retarded, it's not like Jews were blowing themselves up. And killing people. You are comparing apples to oranges. A group that had no radicals at the time that were a threat to a nation and a group that does and is. Both sides sound dumb as XXXX. Not like either side here has the balls to join and help do something about it.


    Like · Reply · 33 · December 8 at 5:28pm



    Hide 19 Replies

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 12310553_1093026510708497_3860183803617678506_n

    Jessica Kay Lange That is EXACTLY what I've been saying everytime someone uses this stupid comparison. Jews were innocent people that the nazis were trying to kill. The jews weren't trying to kill people.


    Like · Reply · 6 · December 8 at 11:19pm

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 12208259_10206488480504269_5881300411231807107_n

    Brandy M. Albert Except the vast majority of Muslims are not violent or extremists and yet we want to treat all of them like they are, soooooo.


    Like · Reply · 7 · 23 hours ago

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 12088460_10153721968169917_396939407317161677_n

    Garrett Smith True Brandy M. Albert but the enemy is using the ones that aren't to get in causing a huge threat. The Jews didn't have that. Honestly we shouldn't let refugees in till we have a sure fire way to figure out who's who or ISIS is taken care of.


    Like · Reply · 23 hours ago

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 12208259_10206488480504269_5881300411231807107_n

    Brandy M. Albert The vetting process for a refugee is 18 months. The individuals who have committed any attacks on our soil were either here via their passport, on a visa, or were a citizen. ISIS is using social media to recruit people all over the world. And the indiv...See More


    Like · Reply · 1 · 21 hours ago

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 1796480_10202017509211938_575888653_n

    Joe Joseph Turner They don't have to blow themselves - because they are military mighty


    Like · Reply · 18 hours ago

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 12088460_10153721968169917_396939407317161677_n

    Garrett Smith Yeah they do. And they are using the fact that we are allies with Saudi Arabia to get to us quicker. And also in my opinion those "refugees" that seem to be mostly male and causing all sorts of trouble over there, should turn around and fight for their Damn homes! I'd help even. But stand up and defend yourself. I find it so dumb that a few nut cases can subdue the masses.





    [10:37:53 AM] Sirius 17: how about this; can you guys see it now? Anyhow my aunt shared this BS meme on her page with these comments
    [10:38:55 AM] ShilohaPlace: yes

    [10:38:57 AM] Sirius 17: Carolina likes this.
    Comments
    I was reading a post by CNN last night where the White House called Trump unfit for the Presidency, since you have to swear to uphold the Constitution. The hate and vitriol in the comments on it were terrifying. I can't believe how ugly full of hate the Right is, and all based on lies. Why has the GOP gone out of their way to create this huge schism in our populace? Their hatred list is long, and Muslims are just ONE group they hate. I was truly scared for the future of my country.

    JulMathe
    I think, if you can do this to Muslims, it's not even a Jump to do it to Christians, or Jews, or whoever. He isn't fit to be president. I'm embarrassed for him. You see the Republican leadership quickly separated themselves from that. I don't think is GOP, its the Donald. He's crazy.

    Carolina Yes, I liked what Ryan said about it - and it's high time they did. They've been letting the radical right tail wag the dog for too long. I find it strange that Ryan would be the sane voice in the crowd, but so glad he finally realized the costs of this schism, not just to the GOP, but the country.

    Raven, try this with your anti-Muslim source. I wish you'd meet some real Muslims and find out what beautiful and peaceful people they are. Please go to a Mosque.

    Raven: You misunderstand me entirely because you make judgements and do not read anything I have to share. I am NOT against the people themselves just their ideology ok. I am against any ideology that is oppressive and destroys freedom. I know that every Muslim is a victim of their belief system just as much as I know other people in other hate groups are victims of bad ideas. As I have said before, Islam is a political war movement riding on the coat tails of religion and I am not buying the BS when they say they are moderate. I have looked into their belief system extensively and have studied what drives their hate for the west and I do not support it. They are posing as wolves in sheep clothing and we must as a nation and free society be very careful of allowing any movement, religion, cult into our country that allows no one to leave it nor criticize it. Now really think about this for a minute and ask yourself why only it is the Muslim world that cannot ever be questioned, ridiculed, or examined without being called an Islamaphobic bigot and hate monger.

    [10:39:13 AM] Sirius 17: notice she hasn't replied to what i said at all
    [10:39:37 AM] ShilohaPlace: What crap  the GOP ATTACKED Trump left and right not support him; the far right is as looney as is the left

    <<< Carolina Raven, try this with your anti-Muslim source. I wish you'd meet some real Muslims and find out what beautiful and peaceful people they are. Please go to a Mosque.

    Taquia
    [10:40:51 AM] ShilohaPlace: Taquia, the 'holy pretense' - So nice and peaceful until they rule the roost

    [10:40:54 AM] Sirius 17: oh it gets even better, my cousin Dawney said this today:

    [10:40:59 AM] Sirius 17: Dawney, Denver, CO ·

    I am beside myself with all the hate and rhetoric in the news right now. I am starting to feel helpless. So I am choosing to approach the world with love because it is the only weapon that I feel can combat hate. I just called the local Mosque to tell them that I don't agree with the hate mongering from the Trump campaign that he doesn't stand for my beliefs or the beliefs of most of the community I choose to surround myself with, and to let them know that if any of their women need escorts to feel safe when they go out I am ready to help. Last month our distillery held an all female comedy show and I donated 20% of our proceeds to a school that helps teen moms and 52Eighty Entertainment who books the talent donated 20% of the door to them as well. LOVE must prevail. If we each take a tiny step to show kindness and tolerance I have to believe we will come out in front of bigotry.

    [10:41:07 AM] ShilohaPlace: What hate? Trump did not do any 'hate speech' where was the word hate in what he said?
    [10:41:36 AM] Sirius 17: exactly
    [10:42:01 AM] ShilohaPlace: [10:40 AM] Sirius 17:

    <<< Dawney
    8 hrs · Denver, CO ·
    I am beside myself....

    [10:42:04 AM] Sirius 17: but yet here you have another perfect example of Islamic asslicking, what ignorance
    [10:42:10 AM] ShilohaPlace: See this is the devil deception right there
    [10:42:24 AM] ShilohaPlace: As said watch the news
    [10:42:52 AM] ShilohaPlace: London newspapers and the banning of those trump articles ALL OVER the Arab controlled world
    [10:43:05 AM] Sirius 17: all Trump did was tell the damn truth, he said what should of been said a long time ago, like 911 rings a bell or did they all fuc11ing forget about that? So now we are all Kumbaya with Islam
    [10:43:21 AM] ShilohaPlace: Immediate response from those barbarians
    [10:43:51 AM] ShilohaPlace: Its bad there because the republicans have sold out
    [10:44:06 AM] ShilohaPlace: Here in Oz same thing the expm is under pressures from everywhere
    [10:44:19 AM] Sirius 17: what a bunch of shi20 this is
    [10:44:36 AM] Sirius 17: you can't tell the truth without being labeled a bigot and hate monger
    [10:44:58 AM] raxnae: social justice at its finest
    [10:44:59 AM] Sirius 17: granted Trump is no spring peach but still, he spoke realistically and with common sense
    [10:45:00 AM] ShilohaPlace: And right now 2 terrorist suspects were arrested right now but all this is not connected to islam see they are both teenagers like Carla wanting to kill
    [10:45:06 AM] ShilohaPlace: and islam ois so peaceful
    [10:45:13 AM] Sirius 17: right, fuc11
    [10:45:27 AM] ShilohaPlace: It is getting more insane by the minute
    [10:45:34 AM] Sirius 17: IT IS!!

    [10:45:35 AM] ShilohaPlace: Teenagers, right??? Wanting to blow themselves and innocent people up BECAUSE they, the 'infidels' and kuffar reject allah and muhammad? And its all so racist to speak against Islam

    [10:46:25 AM] Sirius 17: Can anyone see how you cannot even critisize or talk about Islam without being called xenophobic and whatever else, this is terribly terribly deceptive
    [10:46:49 AM] ShilohaPlace: As said the London major wants to ban Trump of entering the UK to protect the Londoners from 'hate speech'
    [10:47:36 AM] ShilohaPlace: Well the journo weak-asses are gleaming here and there with petitions probably sponsored by the Arabs. They control the Arab global media you know
    [10:48:31 AM] raxnae: people just don't got balls anymore
    [10:48:49 AM] Sirius 17: no they don't rax
    [10:48:55 AM] raxnae: "oh no I don't mean to offend your delicate sensibilities!"
    [10:49:08 AM] Sirius 17: this PC has gone too fuc11ing far, Trump is right about that
    [10:49:27 AM] ShilohaPlace: The so called leaders have lost whatever integrity or honour they might have had over this sure pure treason against their constituencies
    [10:49:41 AM] Sirius 17: he has said a lot of things that needed to be said and he gets lambasted for it
    [10:49:56 AM] ShilohaPlace: Banned like Spencer and Geller and Wilders in Holland?
    [10:50:00 AM] raxnae: and hillary collects the scraps

    [10:50:12 AM] ShilohaPlace: They dont even use the word hate
    [10:50:30 AM] Sirius 17: it is treason, it is putting every American and western citizen in mortal danger because they are too afraid to critisize Islam
    [10:50:56 AM] ShilohaPlace: It is treason against the constitutions with amendments and whatever you call this
    [10:51:10 AM] Sirius 17: yes what i mean
    [10:51:14 AM] ShilohaPlace: Free speech = hate speech see?
    [10:51:17 AM] Sirius 17: they are totally ignoring our rights, yes this is what they are equating it too, what a joke

    [10:51:47 AM] ShilohaPlace: Always this 'they are getting radicalised'

    Question logical?
    Who does the radicalising?
    Answer
    The Mosques, sponsored by the Muslim Brotherhood (controlling the UN) and the Saudi Oil sheiks

    Trump says watch the mosques
    The  effect?
    Hate speech against muslims and islam
    Very (il)logical!

    [10:53:19 AM] ShilohaPlace: Now Juju and Tony and rax are vile muslim hating racists. Here righty now the police chiefs telling everyone we need the parents' help to stop radicalization.
    Blind idiots, the parents are Islam believers and so cannot deradicalise. Jihad is a holy obligation for all muslims period.

    [10:55:50 AM] raxnae: lol thats like asking a home invader's partner in crime to convince him not to rob your house or shoot you

    [10:55:55 AM] ShilohaPlace: So how can a father or mother say don't do jihad?

    [10:56:04 AM] Sirius 17: they can't

    [10:56:42 AM] ShilohaPlace: But the mainstream on ALL Levels thinks it is the imams in the mosques and the muslim parents who can stop radicalization. Its so bizarre and then there is taquia, the divine lying for Allah's sake.

    [10:57:14 AM] Sirius 17: yes this great call to the so called moderates world wide to somehow change Islam; they can't change it, it is FORBIDDEN

    [10:57:33 AM] ShilohaPlace: There is no such thing as moderate Islam

    [10:57:48 AM] Sirius 17: i know that, but this is how they sell the BS

    [10:57:51 AM] ShilohaPlace: It is punishable by death not just forbidden

    [10:59:36 AM] raxnae: all this human mindedness makes me sick' for fuc11s sake just call a spade a spade, most of these ignorant fuc11s haven't even seen a quran verse and even if they do they get convinced they are "misinterpreting" it

    [11:04:57 AM] Sirius 17: Look at this guy who perpetrated the San Bernadino attacks, he worked with those people he killed for years!! How do you justify killing your co-workers like that? You just suddenly wake up one day and say I am going to go kill every single person i have worked with for years because they don't believe in Islam? I mean this is so totally fuc11ing nuts how they can even rationalize killing them let alone people he worked with professionally for years??? It makes no rational sense. But this is how they justifiy it, with Allah, all things are possible, including offering up their bodies for the sake of a fuc11ing Phantom god, because he wills it. What BS.
    They knew they were on a suicide mission, as does every jihadist. This is how sick and decieved they all are

    [11:06:03 AM] ShilohaPlace: Yes and they are believers, meaning they are supermotivated. Some are very intelligent, so your poor socioeconomic background etc is all bogus

    [11:06:38 AM] Sirius 17: yes supermotivated by Allah paradise
    [11:06:47 AM] ShilohaPlace: whatever, misunderstood by the west indeed
    [11:06:55 AM] Sirius 17: exactly, this guy was highly educated, he had a degree in social work
    [11:07:14 AM] ShilohaPlace: But not as the loonies think 'misunderstood', rather underestimated
    [11:07:30 AM] Sirius 17: very underestimated
    [11:07:33 AM] ShilohaPlace: yes
    [11:07:35 AM] Sirius 17: this could happen anywhere
    [11:07:40 AM] Sirius 17: anytime
    [11:07:44 AM] ShilohaPlace: in the west
    [11:07:57 AM] ShilohaPlace: It seems not to happen in China or North Korea lol
    [11:08:19 AM] ShilohaPlace: No tolerance and no multiculturalism misnamed see?
    [11:08:31 AM] Sirius 17: from people you would LEAST expect it from, i mean for fuc11 sakes, his neighbors and co-workers ect had zero idea?? if that is the case he played his moderate muslim shi20 very well
    [11:09:02 AM] ShilohaPlace: yes or the neighbours did not want to become racists
    [11:09:10 AM] Sirius 17: right
    [11:10:02 AM] ShilohaPlace: But you need look no further than your own family. They are blind and deaf and the devil literally took them. Looking for the enemy where he is not
    Your aunts would rather accuse you in some court than ever to change their mind about peaceful Islam see that?


    (16) Jesus said, "Men think, perhaps, that it is peace which I have come to cast upon the world. They do not know that it is dissension which I have come to cast upon the earth: fire, sword, and war. For there will be five in a house: three will be against two, and two against three, the father against the son, and the son against the father. And they will stand solitary."
    (55) Jesus said, "Whoever does not hate his father and his mother cannot become a disciple to me. And whoever does not hate his brothers and sisters and take up his cross in my way will not be worthy of me."
    (99) The disciples said to him, "Your brothers and your mother are standing outside."
    He said to them, "Those here who do the will of my father are my brothers and my mother. It is they who will enter the kingdom of my father."
    (101) <Jesus said,> "Whoever does not hate his father and his mother as I do cannot become a disciple to me. And whoever does not love his father and his mother as I do cannot become a disciple to me. For my mother [...], but my true mother gave me life."  -  GOT-Lambdin


    [11:15:33 AM] ShilohaPlace: It also fits for mothers and daughters and relatives and so on.
    So do you 'hate' Carolina? No, but it means you must 'war' against them in the mind. I hope you understand those codes. It is a 'solitary' war see. You against the 'whole world' and the 'whole' world against you.

    [11:19:58 AM] Sirius 17: sec my mom called

    [11:20:08 AM] ShilohaPlace:


    Revelation 12:7-13 - King James Version (KJV)

    7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

    8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

    9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

    10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.


    [11:20:25 AM] ShilohaPlace: You should try to understand this for the present time. It is BECAUSE this 'devil' has been CAST to Earth that we are doing what we are doing. Heaven is FREE see? Salvation in Heaven but NOT on Earth

    my aunt replied
    [12:28:59 PM] Sirius 17: Carolina: I don't know any other way to say this Raven, but you are wrong. Islam is a peaceful religion. Those that take the old dogma to violent extremes are the same as Christians or Jews who live in the Old Testament - which is very violent and just as oppressive as Sharia Law. Islam is not an ideology, it is a religion. I do beg that you get past this blind hatred and look for the good in the people and the religion.

    Carolina: This is what your cousin Dawney posted this morning. I am joining her in believing in love. You see, I went to college and worked with many Muslims, and just know better then to condemn them all. It's like judging us all by Donald Trump. "I am beside myself with all the hate and rhetoric in the news right now. I am starting to feel helpless. So I am choosing to approach the world with love because it is the only weapon that I feel can combat hate. I just called the local Mosque to tell them that I don't agree with the hate mongering from the Trump campaign that he doesn't stand for my beliefs or the beliefs of most of the community I choose to surround myself with, and to let them know that if any of their women need escorts to feel safe when they go out I am ready to help. Last month our distillery held an all female comedy show and I donated 20% of our proceeds to a school that helps teen moms and 52Eighty Entertainment who books the talent donated 20% of the door to them as well. LOVE must prevail. If we each take a tiny step to show kindness and tolerance I have to believe we will come out in front of bigotry."

    [12:36:10 PM] ShilohaPlace: When Dawney and Carolina are gang raped and beheaded in a future incarnation under a worldwide domination of Islam, they might change their minds about the religion of love Juju
    [12:36:59 PM] Sirius 17: yes i can see it is futile to try to make any more points to them, they have decided now that Islam is the relgion of love and peace
    [12:37:16 PM] ShilohaPlace: As is the devil's plan
    [12:37:52 PM] Sirius 17: when she told me i should visit a mosque and find out i should of said, i would but they won't allow a Kuffar to even enter the grounds, let alone mosque
    [12:38:17 PM] ShilohaPlace: Well they might under taquia see? After carolina phoned them they would love to show her how peaceful their mosques are
    [12:38:51 PM] Sirius 17: but of course she went to college and knows Muslims and so is right about everything. wtf do i know, i am just an ignorant Muslim hater according to her -  true
    [12:39:14 PM] ShilohaPlace: Be proud of it, not the hate, but the awareness
    [12:39:37 PM] Sirius 17: oh i am dear, it just saddens me they can't see the deception; how decieved they are as well as half the country or world for that matter
    She keeps calling me a hater lol and she completely missed the fact i told her i don't hate them; it is like she has some kind of blindness, literally to my words
    [1:30:03 PM] Sirius 17: i have decided not to reply to her diatribe there anymore, and just let my original statement stand. The one where i posed the question, why can't Islam be questioned like all other religions.
    Where i asked her to really think about that and which of course got ignored


    Last edited by shiloh on Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:19 am; edited 2 times in total
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:10 am

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 1255-75-jpg
    Pris


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 70e0l815n3a7s904-png



    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam 1265-36-jpg
    SophiasChoice

    You know Shiloh...
    You are absolutely right. Fact is that the same happens with Cristian boys and girls that are indoctrinated by extreme cristians.
    Remember the KKK?

    I think You are very short sighted. A slave to what you are fed by the main stream media and incapable of discerning stand alone incidents and stories from a group of loosely related people. (people who hold the koran as holy) Same as that not all people who hold the bible as holy ascribe the samel evel of value to that book.

    You are giving in to your fears and now try to project them unto us as well.
    Well sir.. No thank you.

    Also I am now quite certain you have not sat with someone who holds the koran dear and listened.
    If you had, you would have realized there was a person sitting across from you with the same hopes and dreams as you.
    Who would love nothing more than a life of joy and abundance, just like you.
    And who hold his ideas for truth... Just like all of us.
    In a conversation those ideas may change. But only if we listen to each other.

    Sure the koran says to chop of the hands of thieves. I even think that's in the bible too.
    Did you know it also states that if someone steals from hunger. Its the people in office who should get their hand cut off instead of the thief?

    There's always some good to be found, as well as a shitload of misinterpretation, misunderstanding and just plain mischief...

    Anyway enjoy your day. brighten up a bit and meet some new people to talk to ok?
    You just may learn something

    With Love
    Eelco

    [9:32:53 PM] Sirius 17:

    Pat Selden Religions, like any other ideology, are what you make them to be; they can be peaceful or they can be brutal. Just as no one human-being is the same as the other - there's no such thing as a "true" or "false" person - there's no such thing as one Islam, one Christianity, one Judaism, one capitalism, one socialism, just dozens and dozens of different ones.
    I'm a Christian, of the Quaker persuasion: I follow a religion of peace. Many of my co-religionists are aggressive, arrogant, selfish bastards - hell, many of my fellow Quakers are - and some even kill in the name of Christ; many are saints in all but name; the rest of us live in the gaps in between.
    Most of the Muslims I know follow a religion of peace; these murdering assholes clearly don't.
    Islam and Christianity: religions of war or peace, depending on the believers, not the faith.
    "There is only love or fear."
    These scumbags chose fear: don't join them.
    Choose love.


    [9:33:13 PM] Sirius 17: yeah i got similar rantings on the fb post just now
    [9:33:17 PM] ShilohaPlace: Same idiocy see?
    [9:33:37 PM] Sirius 17: yes same excuses
    [9:33:58 PM] ShilohaPlace: A worship of their own intelligence and discernment, unable to discern facts from false pretenses.
    [9:34:03 PM] Sirius 17: let's not question the ideology at all, look past that and just think kumbayah
    [9:34:06 PM] ShilohaPlace: As coded millennia ago. We are to listen to the islamists? Are they, have they and are the nabsers listening to what we said? The hypocrisy of 2000 years ago.
    [9:35:30 PM] Sirius 17: yes
    [9:36:06 PM] ShilohaPlace:


    (39) Jesus said, "The pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge (gnosis) and hidden them. They themselves have not entered, nor have they allowed to enter those who wish to. You, however, be as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves."


    Proverbs 13:16 - King James Version (KJV)

    16 Every prudent man dealeth with knowledge: but a fool layeth open his folly.




    Petition to ban Donald Trump from the UK gets 100,000 signatures

    December 9, 2015 2:40 pm By Robert Spencer 83 Comments

    There is no freedom of speech in Britain anymore. There is just the big thundering herd getting led around by the political and media elites. Say something that is unpopular with those elites, and you’re liable to be banned from the country.

    British Future director Sunder Katwala says: “The UK Home Office has set out clear guidelines which have led to the exclusion of preachers of hate from the UK if their presence here would not be conducive to the public good. Theresa May has excluded extreme Islamists on these grounds” — while letting in a huge number of jihad preachers, such as Mohammed al-Arefe, who has said: “Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight.” That was just fine with Theresa May.

    Katwala goes on to say that the Home Office has “kept out those who have fanned extreme anti-Muslim prejudice, such as the bloggers Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer. Trump’s statements are more extreme than theirs.” The Express goes on to characterize us as “extremists Geller and Spencer.” How did we fan “extreme anti-Muslim prejudice” and become “extremists”? The letter that the Home Office sent me said that I was banned for saying: “[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society because media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.” This is a garbled version of what I actually said, which is that Islam in its traditional formulations and core texts mandates warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers.

    This is tantamount to banning me for saying that the sky is blue and the grass is green. This is what gets you labeled a dangerous “extremist” in Britain these days: noting an obvious factual point that is reinforced by every day’s headlines. And now the same sinister authoritarians who are rapidly destroying Britain have set their sights on banning Trump as well. While I am no fan of Trump and could never support his candidacy, and see a certain poetic justice in the foes of free speech turning on a man who doesn’t understand the importance of defending free speech, this is still a grave injustice, and a sign of how close Britain is to falling into the abyss.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Donald-trump-jpg

    “‘Block Donald Trump from UK’ 100,000 sign petition as fury rages over Muslim ban call,” by Greg Heffer and Rebecca Perring, Express, December 9, 2015:
    A staggering FOUR Britons a second have signed a petition calling for the billionaire to be blocked from entering the UK, after he vowed to ban all Muslims from America.
    At 12.30pm more than 100,000 people had signed an online petition stating: “The signatories believe Donald J Trump should be banned from UK entry”.

    Reaching the 100,000 threshold means it will have to be considered for debate in Parliament.
    Radical candidate Trump has sparked international outrage after he pledged to bar access to the US for all Muslims if he were to win power.
    The property tycoon is hoping to win the Republican nomination to run in next November’s presidential election.

    The petition adds: “The UK has banned entry to many individuals for hate speech. The same principles should apply to everyone who wishes to enter the UK.
    “If the United Kingdom is to continue applying the ‘unacceptable behaviour’ criteria to those who wish to enter its borders, it must be fairly applied to the rich as well as poor, and the weak as well as powerful.”

    Just after 8.30am this morning, 45,000 people had signed the petition meaning more than doubled its support in less than four hours.
    Trump, who is worth an estimated $4.5billion (£3bn), yesterday tried to justify his extremist policy by bizarrely claiming some parts of London are so “radicalised” police officers fear for their lives.

    The 69-year-old said he was calling for an American ban on Muslims so the country is not left with no-go areas where police are “afraid for their own lives” from Islamist terrorists like in Paris and London.
    Referring to the recent Islamic State (ISIS) attacks in the French capital, he said: “Look at what happened in Paris, the horrible carnage, and frankly, if you look at Paris, and I hate to do this because the Chamber of Commerce is going to go crazy, but Paris is no longer the same city it was.

    “They have sections in Paris that are radicalised, where the police refuse to go there. They’re petrified. The police refuse to go in there.
    “We have places in London and other places that are so radicalised that the police are afraid for their own lives. We have to be very smart and very vigilant.”
    Mayor of London Boris Johnson hit back at Trump’s false portrayal of the capital, quipping the only reason he wouldn’t go to some parts of New York “is the real risk of meeting Donald Trump”.

    He added: “As a city where more than 300 languages are spoken, London has a proud history of tolerance and diversity and to suggest there are areas where police officers cannot go because of radicalisation is simply ridiculous.”

    Prime Minister David Cameron also branded Trump’s far-right views “divisive, unhelpful and quite simply wrong” while Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn branded the American politician’s comments an “affront to humanity” and called for people to “unite against racism”.

    The Metropolitan Police said they “would not normally dignify such comments with a response” but added Trump “could not be more wrong” with his description of ‘no-go areas’ in the capital.
    He was also offered a briefing on “the reality of policing London”….

    British Future director Sunder Katwala said in a statement on his organisation’s website: “It is hugely irresponsible for a prominent figure like Trump to fan the flames of prejudice in this way and raises questions over whether the UK should consider barring Trump from the UK on hate speech grounds.

    “The proposals are ludicrous and unconstitutional, and will be rejected by America’s decent majority, among them many proud Muslim Americans. They are also a gift to ISIS propaganda, playing into the idea of a ‘clash of civilisations’.
    He added: “It is important that the UK Government makes very clear that this extreme view is rejected and repudiated in the strongest possible terms.

    “The UK Home Office has set out clear guidelines which have led to the exclusion of preachers of hate from the UK if their presence here would not be conducive to the public good.
    “Theresa May has excluded extreme Islamists on these grounds, and also kept out those who have fanned extreme anti-Muslim prejudice, such as the bloggers Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer. Trump’s statements are more extreme than theirs.

    “Unless and until Trump were to retract these highly prejudiced comments, there is a good case for making clear that he would be refused entry to the UK by the Home Secretary.”
    Extremists Geller and Spencer were banned from attending a far-right English Defence League march in 2013 because their presence would not have been “conducive to the public good”….

    Some Muslims in U.S. irritated by Obama's call for them to root out "extremism"
    Ohio pro-Islamic State Muslim who called for US soldiers to be beheaded in their homes is arrested


    dumbledoresarmy says

    December 9, 2015 at 4:36 pm
    Since the subject of the thread is the UK, here is a very, very interesting piece, via the excellent Israeli blogger, “Israellycool”. A review of Tommy Robinson’s book (reviewer is a bloke named ‘Brian of London’ – an Israeli who was reared in the UK and knows the territory). Brian gives it a good chit.
    But it makes for terrifying reading. Best bit, however, is an extensive quote from the book in which Tommy describes what happened when, after the British authorities managed to find a way of locking him up in jail, a Muslim dawa outfit gave him a Quran…and he read it. You see, he founded the EDL on the basis of common-sense observation of mohammedan bad behaviour, without knowing exactly where all the patterns of bad behaviour were coming from…but when he was sitting in his jail cell with a Koran, with lots of time to read and reflect, and put 2 and 2 together, it all clicked into place. It was like, “Oh XXXX, so THAT’S why they’re doing this…and this…and this…”.
    http://www.israellycool.com/2015/12/05/tommy-robinson-says-hes-an-enemy-of-the-state-book-review/

    I quote:
    “Such as I had entertainment, it was getting on the nerves of the Muslim prisoners down the block with me. If there was one positive to take away from that experience, it was a better understanding of the type of people I was dealing with.
    “I read the Koran during those 22 weeks in solitary and suddenly all of what I suppose people might call Islamic prejudices didn’t seem so prejudiced at all.
    “Most of what I’d heard second and third hand was right there in black and white, absolute encouragement – no, a divine instruction – to act atrociously towards the rest of the world. Obey Allah or burn in hell forever. Page after page of it. Sex slaves, the lot. The thing is horrific.
    “The Koran was sent to me by a Dawa group – Muslim missionaries who try to turn people to Islam.
    “They probably thought they were having a laugh at my expense, but they ended up doing me a huge favour.

    (ROFLMAO – talk about the Ummah scoring an ‘own goal’ and then some! giving Tommy Robinson a Quran to read so he could find out exactly what their Book of War had in it! – dda)
    “I started writing down key facts, about their hateful attitude towards Jews and Christians, about sexual slavery. I couldn’t get my head round it. Here was the holy book the world’s Muslims want to rule the planet by – and if you ask my opinion, the thing should be banned for inciting racial and religious hatred on almost every page…”.
    You’re in good company, Tommy Robinson. William Gladstone, a long-ago PM of the UK, held up the Koran in Parliament, called it “an accursed book” and stated that “so long as there is this book there will be no peace on the earth”.
    Though from another POV, so long as there are mohammedans about on the planet, the Quran in accurate translations by non-Muslim scholars *should* be freely available – though with clearly posted warnings and non-Islamophile commentary attached – so that every Infidel knows *exactly* what the mohammedan agenda is. The Quran, Sira, Hadiths, Al-Tabari and co. *should* be on the bookshelves of every Infidel general…so that they can *anticipate* and outsmart mohammedan gang bosses in the battlefield and elsewhere. For example: once one knows about the way hudna works, all the delusive ‘peace processes’ around the world – India (with Pakistan, over Kashmir), Thailand, Philippines, Israel, etc – would be ditched by the Infidel side, as a total waste of time.

    Michael Copeland says
    December 9, 2015 at 6:51 pm
    Several Met officers have said the ‘Islamification’ of some parts of the capital requires ‘extra vigilance’ and they can’t wear uniforms for safety reasons – despite Scotland Yard claiming the tycoon ‘couldn’t be more wrong’. (UK Daily Mail )

    http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/12/09/uk-police-say-donald-trump-is-right-about-no-go-zones-in-london/#comments

    UK Police say “Donald Trump is right about NO-GO Zones in London”

    “We can’t wear our uniforms in our own cars and some Muslim areas of London are so radicalized, they are virtual ‘NO-GO’ Zones,” say serving police officers today, who backed Donald Trump’s claim that some Muslim communities in the UK are no-go areas because of Muslim extremism.

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Article-2020382-0d310e3000000578-902_1024x615_large-e1449698746515-jpg
    This is in London
    UK Daily Mail (h/t Susan K) Several Met officers have said the ‘Islamification’ of some parts of the capital requires ‘extra vigilance’ and they can’t wear uniforms for safety reasons – despite Scotland Yard claiming the tycoon ‘couldn’t be more wrong’.

    Home Secretary Theresa May tonight rejected Mr Trump’s claims, insisting: ‘The police in London are not afraid to go out and police the streets.’


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Dyhgvof-e1422314252317-1-jpg
    Gov. Bobby Jindal was bashed for saying the same thing awhile ago
    The US presidential contender caused worldwide consternation yesterday after a string of incendiary remarks about Muslims, including in Britain, and said: ‘We have places in London and other places that are so radicalised that police are afraid for their own lives.’

    But one serving officer said today Trump had ‘pointed out something plainly obvious, something which I think we aren’t as a nation willing to own up to.’


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Nogo-zones-7-638-jpg
    Another policeman said that he and other colleagues fear being terror targets and spoke of the ‘dire warning’ from bosses not to wear a uniform ‘even in my own car’.

    It came as more than 250,000 people – seven people every second – signed a petition demanding Mr Trump is banned from Britain for being a ‘hate preacher’ – an idea rejected by Chancellor George Osborne.



    billybob says
    December 9, 2015 at 9:30 pm
    I am a bit shocked to see Geller and Spencer referred to as “Extremists”. Extreme in what way? Extremely knowledgeable and articulate? Extremely well versed in the subject of Islam? Even extremely presentable as public speakers? And Briton doesn’t want them to open a badly needed discussion in their country…
    We desperately need courageous people like Geller and Spencer, who provide a valuable perspective on the the most topical issue of our times. So few people know what is in the Quran and what Islam is all about. Why aren’t the Quran and Hadiths discussed broadly in universities, exactly with the perspective provided by Geller and Spencer, in the best traditions of academia?
    When I was young, the scourge of the day was Natziism and Communism. We had many books promoting these ideologies that concerned a lot of people, like Mein Kempf, Quotations from Mao Tse Tung, and many others. How did we as a society deal with our concerns? Some thought such books should be banned, while most realized that would make their insidious ideas even more alluring.
    It was not by banning books, but rather, by discussing them openly in the broad light of day in universities that provided perspective. Proponents and critics were welcomed alike, and the fallacies in the core logic of these ideologies was clearly exposed in the process. This was an educational experience we grew up with, and that inoculated us against extreme ideologies. And by the way, we never lost any sleep worrying that the communists or natizis would feel insulted because we critiqued their ideologies.
    Really, I shouldn’t be here on Spencer’s website talking about this. Spencer should be so booked up ahead by universities all over the West as a guest speaker that he wouldn’t have time to dabble in a website. What is wrong with this world the he isn’t? Is Islam somehow so sacred that it is exempt from healthy criticism? Of course, it exempts itself, but that doesn’t count with me. I feel I have a right to be well informed.
    It seems there are people and leaders who equate criticism of Islam with hate. They want to put such discussion off limits. They are very short sighted. It seems to me if Islam was discussed from all angles as broadly and freely as communism or natziism or any other political ideology, it would be far healthier for society.
    Recently, I remember so much talk of the fake religion Scientology. It was broadly discussed in forums all over the internet, to such a point where we aren’t really that interested in it anymore. Before that, they were so many other movements. Who remembers the Moonies, for example? In these cases, nobody blinked an eye at criticism of the core teachings of these groups. Nobody would accuse you of hate speech if you criticized Scientology, or even accuse you of being a racist bigot. Why should Islam be exempt?
    It is my hope that one day we will no longer hear Geller and Spencer referred to as “Extremists”. Rather, they will simply be sought after lecturers and guest speakers who are appreciated for their knowledge and perspective.






    PrayerWarrior says
    December 9, 2015 at 9:53 pm
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/625545/Donald-Trump-Muslims-speech-British-police-ISIS-radicalisation-London
    Rank and file policemen are saying Trump is right about ‘no go’ zones.’
    "The anonymous officer wrote on the online forum Police.Community: “I’m not allowed to travel in half blues to work anymore IN MY OWN CAR as we’re ’All at risk of attack’ – yet as soon as someone points out the obvious it’s ‘divisive.'”
    He added: “In this instance he (Trump) isn’t wrong. Our political leaders are best either ill-informed or simply being disingenuous."

     Baucent says
    December 10, 2015 at 1:58 am
    As for the “no go zones”, Trump probably got confused. There are definately “unpoliced” zones in Paris, Brussels and Sweden. But Tower Hamlets in London isn’t far off becoming a “no go” area. They tried to declare it a Sharish Zone last year, so Mayor Boris (“the Turk”) Johnson is being a little coy. The most popular baby boys name last year in London was …Mohammed (in various spellings), so Islamisation is well on track.



    • Adam says

      December 10, 2015 at 3:39 am

      There is an area in Tower Hamlet’s called “Shadwell”, it’s an utter pit. There are street signs written in Bengali…oh & English surprisingly.



    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Thu Dec 10, 2015 6:01 am

    December 10, 2015

    Trump vindicated: London police do fear for their lives entering Muslim enclaves

    By Carol Brown
    Historically, dhimmitude has been second-class citizen status imposed on non-believers by Muslims. But now we are witnessing an unprecedented phenomenon whereby Westerners willingly embrace dhimmitude. Muslims don’t have to force it on them. Westerners willingly sign up.
    Go figure.
    There are countless examples of voluntary dhimmitude around the world. This blog is about places in the UK where policing has become dysfunctional, if it exists at all, as sharia law is allowed to take hold. The blog also touches upon the UK’s potential ban of Donald Trump.

    Breitbart reports on the current state of policing in and around London, where one police officer stated: “When I was a teenage lad in [B]urnley there were no go white areas. This IS the case still nationally… including London where you have to have extra vigilance in certain parts when you are working”. This same officer also said “Islamification has and is occurring. You have to have extra vigilance in certain parts when you are working.”
    And he’s not the only one.

    The Daily Mail reports that a policeman said that he and his colleagues are fearful they will be targets of terror attacks and that they’ve received “dire warning” from their superiors not to wear their uniforms, “even in their cars”.
    But they are not the only two reporting on the collapse of police authority in certain regions of the country. The Daily Mail reports on another police officer who said “there are Muslim areas of Preston that, if we wish to patrol, we have to contact local Muslim community leaders to get their permission.”
    Another police officer stated that if an officer “were attacked in one of these neighborhoods, it would be written off, noting “even if one of us did get killed or dragged off in a van, it would just be reported as a ‘one-off incident’ and no reason to change the ‘British style of policing.’”

    Another officer who resigned this year said he resigned because he couldn’t take the climate anymore and confirmed what several officers spoke of regarding the directive not to wear their uniform while on duty for fear of being attacked. The order came from Scotland Yard and has been rationalized not as a policy founded on fear but as one based on risk reduction or “damage limitation.”
    When the police must hide their identity (or when those in command think they should), something has gone dreadfully wrong.
    Still more officers have spoken out and shared their stories. One said their vehicles are attacked, with break lines cut along with other damage while another officer summed up the situation as follows: “I am reluctant to name the communities in question but there are communities from other cultures who would prefer to police themselves. There are cities in the Midlands where the police never go because they are never called. They never hear of any trouble because the community deals with that on its own. They just have their own form of community justice.”

    And on it goes.
    Most recently, this madness has expressed itself in a petition to ban Donald Trump from the UK for his comment that there are areas of London that are “so radicalized, the police are afraid for their lives.” The Daily Mail reports:


    No matter that the statement appears to be true, the momentum is building in the UK to ban Trump as Brits stand tall against “hate speech.”
    Seven people every second are signing a government petition to ban Donald Trump from Britain for “hate speech” after the tycoon's claims that police in London “fear for their lives” because some communities are so radicalised.
    David Cameron, Jeremy Corbyn, Nicola Sturgeon, Boris Johnson and even Scotland Yard issued strongly-worded condemnation of the outspoken businessman after he claimed: “We have places in London and other places that are so radicalised that police are afraid for their own lives.”
    Mr Johnson, the Mayor of London said Mr Trump was speaking “utter nonsense” and openly mocked the American, adding: “The only reason I wouldn't go to some parts of New York is the real risk of meeting Donald Trump.”

    The Daily Mail also reports that most signatures are from London, Edinburgh, and Bristol, that the petition now has more than a quarter of a million signatures, and that it will be considered for debate in Parliament. Sharia law is taking hold across the UK as thousands upon thousands of colonizers from Islamic lands invade, and Parliament might debate whether or not Donald Trump should be allowed to enter the country. New world order priorities have taken hold.
    In contrast, some police officers have come out in support of Trump’s comments, with one stating: “In this instance he [Trump] isn’t wrong. Our political leaders are best either ill-informed or simply being disingenuous. He’s pointed out something that is plainly obvious, something which I think we aren’t as a nation willing to own up to – do you think a US Police Department would ban officers from wearing their uniforms under jackets etc due to FEAR of their cops being killed by extremists?”

    As for the Brits’ puffed out, self-righteous pride about banning “hate speech,” they are doing a bang up job targeting the wrong people. As imams across the country incite violence, the UK has banned people like Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Michael Savage. The once Great Britain can no longer discern friend from foe, defenders of freedom from those who wish to destroy their nation.
    The truth has become unrecognizable to the ever-growing volunteer dhimmi class, who “stand tall” against their own survival.


    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/12/trump_vindicated_london_police_emdoem_fear_for_their_lives_entering_muslim_enclaves.html#ixzz3tuzCtghj
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:30 am

    December 10, 2015
    Millennials Waking Up to the Threat of Terrorism?

    By Eileen F. Toplansky
    I often show the 2006 documentary Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West to my college students. For many, it is an incredible eye-opener. With the latest terrorist attacks by jihadists in Paris and California, this movie is particularly relevant. And the comments by the students speak volumes.



    Uploaded on Jun 8, 2011

    Obsession is a film about the threat of Radical Islam to Western civilization. Using unique footage from Arab television, it reveals an 'insider's view' of the hatred the Radicals are teaching, their incitement of global jihad, and their goal of world domination.
     The film also traces the parallels between the Nazi movement of World War II, the Radicals of today, and the Western world's response to both threats. Featuring interviews with Daniel Pipes, Steve Emerson, Alan Dershowitz, a former PLO terrorist, and a former Hitler Youth Commander with clips of Noni Darwish also Brigitte Gabriel author of "Because They Hate" and "They Must Be Stopped"
    We, in the West and all non-Muslim countries are at war with Radical Islam. Today, June 8th, 2011 nothing much has changed except that Radical Islam has grown in every country including the USA and (at least on the surface) very little has been done since September 11, 2001 to stop this infestation of Islamic ideology and of hatred toward Western civilization and values.
    Since 9/11/2001 there have been more than 17,000 terrorists attacks around the world.
    What can you do?: Visit http://www.actforamerica.org/ Brigitte Gabriel's organization to enlighten America about this terrible threat to our way of life.





    A student who hails from Africa writes:
    I'm disgusted by the fact that extreme Muslim people taught children to hate Christians and Jews. I'm offended because I am a Christian and I wouldn't want any of this wished upon someone else. But above all, we are in the day and age where old texts aren't morally acceptable, like for example, in the Koran, Allah states that you shouldn't befriend Christians and Jews.

    A young man who served in the armed forces explains:
    ... the film is a great method of educating and updating people around the world with the issues we are facing with the Islamic community. We are sitting at the end of 2015 still dealing with attacks, refusing to face the fact that they are out to destroy anyone who doesn't follow their believes [sic].

    A young Hindu student remarks:
    ... this film was edjucational [sic] and should be shown throughout America in all schools. Maybe American children are too unaware of this group of people who don't value human life. Kids these days are only worried about likes and comments, while Islam is teaching their kids how to disguise themselves and blend in among crowds. We are becoming vulnerable and falling behind. Just like Hitler, the head of this movement should be killed. They are taking the joy of a child and replacing it with hate. Not only are they taking a child's innocence, but people don't expect kids to be suicide bombers.

    A young female student who worried about the possibility of another World War writes:
    Children are taught at a very young age to hate infidels which is something that basically ruins their lives because hate will only lead to violence. The jihadists are using Islam as their excuse to want to kill anybody who does not approve of their way of life. The sad part is many other Muslims are put into a box with the jihadist, so the whole wide world assumes that every Muslim wants to destroy the world.

    More visceral reactions from these students comes in the following:
    My only reaction to this video is a great amount of disgust and hatred. To be honest there was [sic] many times I wanted to leave the room just because of how mad the video was making me. I am happy that there are good Muslims out there that do not agree with the terrorists. That brings my hopes up, but all this protesting and speeches do very little in my eyes to stop the terrorists. Children are being taught to hate and to kill for Allah. Also I think it is interesting that the terrorists burned down all religious centers where they are except for the mosque and here in America we have places for Muslims to practice their religion. It baffles me.

    An African-American female athlete writes that she has learned:
    ... a lot of cultures have had problems with Jews. It is sad for all Jews to be Jewish because they cannot be proud of who they are without persecution. I live in a town which is predominantly Jewish and they are the quietiest [sic] and most harmless people. In my opinion, how countries treat Jews is how a bully would treat a quiet student who bothers no one. They just want something to pick on. I don't watch the news but I believe this DVD has better informed me than any news or book or program would have.

    Another student from the Dominican Republic admits that he:
    ... never really cared about the threat of terrorism. It's strange how I could be so oblivious and indifferent to the things happening around me in the world. My eyes have truly been open [sic] to the truth. I also hate how people try to use religion to justify hateful actions.

    Another female student asserted that "it is extremely disturbing" how "the [terrorists] are giving their children lessons on how to hate. Before this DVD was shown in class, I had no idea how terrifying this war was between us and the Islamic world. I believe that Americans need to wake up before it is too late and protect our nation."

    In addition, a young woman said that she "did not know how drastic the situation was." She went on to explain:
    ... the guys at [her] job made jokes about jihad but when [she] told them about everything that [she] had seen in the film, they began to think about these situations more seriously. [She] is thinking of building a bomb shelter because [she is] a strong Christian and [she] will continue to be so, as safely as [she] can be and believes that God will provide for [her] and [her] family.

    A young woman whose parents come from Azerbaijan writes:
    ... the treatment of Jewish [sic] particularly and the degree to which anti-semitism still runs rampant post-WWII is shocking. It's difficult to imagine the culture and circumstances that could raise such blind hatred in a group of people.


    These students are all college freshmen. Their raw responses draw from a reservoir of feelings that many Americans are experiencing as we witness the far too regular Islamic terrorist attacks worldwide and in the United States. Yet with only one powerful film juxtaposed with in-class discussions of the freedoms of the Bill of Rights, these students are showing an intellectual acuity and common sense that far too many of our leaders long ago abandoned.

    These students clearly perceive the danger of Islamic jihad while Obama and too many politically correct possible jihadist sympathizers and spineless officials downplay the genuine danger assailing America and the world.

    Clarifying the incompatibility between American freedom and Islamic jihadist terror is the most urgent issue of our time. As one student writes:

    ... radical Islamism must not be allowed to be spread any further than it has already. The ideas and beliefs are to the detriment of society as a whole. To wish to spread nothing but death in the name of any god not only distorts the idea of sound and reasonable religion but also imposes generalizations from skeptics on every other religion. While the majority of Muslims in the world are moderate and oppose these extremist beliefs the fact still remains that far too many are not speaking out against it. Peace is not something that is given. Peace is something that must be won.


    Yet, when confronted with the actual number of 330-plus million Muslims out of one billion Muslims who do support jihad and the imposition of sharia law, the students realize that "small" is a relative term.

    Finally, "modern day extremists use almost all the same motives Nazi Germany used in the 1940s for world domination. If Americans and people around the world acknowledge these issues and don't act on them, we are waiting for our demise."
    And "it is only right that Muslims need to realize that they cannot overpower the world and deprive people from their own religion."

    A few semesters back, I received an email from a student. She wrote, "I am your former student from last semester. Though you may not remember me, I want to say thank you for educating me and our class on the Middle East, our rights, and sharia law. If it wasn't for you I would not understand what is going on in the world. Just wanted to show some appreciation."

    Out of the mouths of babes come many truths. Now we must act, for the time is growing short, and we owe these young people our best efforts.

    Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com.




    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/millennials_waking_up_to_the_threat_of_terrorism.html#ixzz3tvKKGuvA
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook


    !Muhammad! Check-Mate !Allah!



    It's all Self-Relative - Or is It?
    Old Age-Lucifer-God and Science and Truth-Jesus-New Age


    Last edited by shiloh on Fri Dec 11, 2015 1:56 am; edited 3 times in total
    Carol
    Carol
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 31798
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  Carol Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:36 pm

    I found this relevant and wanted to post it in this thread.

    Subject: We are basically unprepared and unaware

    If you're going to read something, let it be this ! Very timely.

    I am sure you have read about Juval Aviv. Here's an UPDATE! (He was Golda Meir's bodyguard and the Israeli agent upon whom the movie 'Munich' was based. Golda Meir appointed him to track down and bring to justice the Palestinian terrorists who took the Israeli athletes hostage and killed them during the Munich Olympic Games.)

    In a lecture in New York City a few weeks ago, Aviv shared information that EVERY American needs to know, but that our government has not yet shared with us.

    A little background: Aviv predicted the London subway bombing on the Bill O'Reilly show on 'Fox News', stating publicly that it would happen within a week. At the time, O'Reilly laughed and mocked him, saying that in a week he wanted Aviv back on the show.  Unfortunately, within a week the terrorist attack had occurred.

    Juval Aviv also gave intelligence to the Bush Administration about 9/11 a month before it occurred. His report specifically said that they would use planes as bombs and target high profile buildings and monuments. I think we all know what happened, right?  Congress has since hired Aviv as a security consultant.

    Aviv predicts that the next terrorist attack on the U.S. will occur within the next few months. Forget hijacking airplanes, because he says terrorists will NEVER try hijacking a plane again, as they know the people on board will never go down quietly again.

    Aviv says that our airport security is a joke, 'that we have been reactionary' rather than proactive in developing strategies that are truly effective.

    Example 1: Because an idiot tried to light his shoe on fire, now everyone has to take off their shoes.

    Example 2: A group of idiots tried to bring aboard liquid explosives, and now we can't bring liquids on board.

    He says he's waiting for some suicidal maniac to pour liquid explosive on his underwear; government security will then have us all traveling naked!

    Last but not least, our airport security looks for metal, but the new explosives are made of plastic!

    Currently, our government only focuses on security when people are heading to the gates. Aviv says that if a terrorist attack targets airports in the future, they will target busy times on the front end of the airport when/where people are checking in.

    For example, it would be easy for someone to take two suitcases of explosives, walk up to a busy check-in line, ask a person next to them to watch their bags for a minute while they run to the restroom, and then detonate the bags BEFORE security even gets involved.

    In Israel, security checks bags BEFORE people can even ENTER the airport.

    Aviv says the next terrorist attack here in America is imminent and will involve suicide bombers and non-suicide bombers in places where large groups of people congregate, such as Disneyland, Las Vegas casinos, shopping malls, subways in rush hour, train stations, etc., as well as in rural America this time (Wyoming, Montana, etc.). The attack will be characterized by simultaneous detonations around the country involving at least 5-8 cities, including rural areas.

    Aviv says terrorists won't need to use suicide bombers in many of the larger cities, because at places like the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, they can simply valet park a car loaded with explosives and walk away.

    Aviv says all of the above is well known in intelligence circles, but that our U.S. Government does not want to 'alarm American citizens' with the facts. The world, however, is soon going to become 'a different place', Aviv says, where issues like 'global warming' and 'political correctness' will have become totally irrelevant.

    On an encouraging note, Aviv says that Americans don't have to be concerned about being nuked. He says the terrorists who want to destroy America will not use sophisticated weapons.

    Instead, they like to use suicide, as it's cheap, it's easy, and it's effective and they have an infinite abundance of young, ignorant, fanatic militants who are more than willing to 'go see Allah'.

    Aviv also says the next level of terrorists over which America should be most concerned will not be coming from abroad. They will instead be 'home grown' meaning they will have attended and been educated in our own schools and universities right here in the U.S. These young terrorists will be most dangerous because they will know our language and will fully understand the habits of Americans; but that we Americans won't know/understand a thing about them.

    So, what can America do to protect itself? From an intelligence perspective, Aviv says the U.S. needs to stop relying on satellites and technology for its intelligence.

    Instead, we need to follow Israel's, Ireland's and England's hands-on examples of human intelligence, from an infiltration perspective as well as to trust 'aware' citizens to help. We need to engage and educate ourselves as citizens; however, our U.S. Government continues to treat us, its citizens, 'like babies'. Our government thinks we can't handle the truth' and are concerned that we'll panic if we understand the realities of terrorism. Aviv says this is a deadly mistake.

    Aviv recently created/executed a security test for Congress by placing an empty briefcase in five well-traveled spots in five major cities.  The result? Not one person called 911 or sought a policeman to check it out. In fact, in Chicago, someone tried to steal the briefcase!

    In comparison, Aviv says that citizens of Israel are so well 'trained' that an unattended bag or package would be reported in seconds by citizen(s) who know to publicly shout, 'Unattended Bag!' The area would be quickly & calmly cleared by the citizens themselves.

    But, unfortunately, America hasn't been 'hurt enough' yet by terrorism for their government to fully understand the need to educate its citizens or for the government to understand that it's the citizens who are, inevitably, the best first-line of defense against terrorism.

    Aviv also was concerned about the high number of children who were at the time in preschool and kindergarten after 9/11, children who were basically 'lost' without parents being able to pick them up, and schools that had no plan in place to best care for the students until their parents could get there. In New York City, in some cases this was days!  He stresses the importance of having a plan that's agreed upon within your family, to respond to in the event of a terrorist emergency. He urges parents to contact their children's schools and demand that the schools, too, develop plans of action, as they do in Israel. He says we should all have a plan that is easy enough for even our youngest children to remember and follow.

    Does your family know what to do if you can't contact one another by phone? Where would you gather in an emergency?

    Aviv says that the U.S. Government has in force a plan that, in the event of another terrorist attack, will immediately cut-off EVERYONE's ability to use cell phones, as this is the preferred communication source used by terrorists and is often the way that their bombs are detonated. How will you communicate with your loved ones in the event you cannot use phones, internet? Bottom line, you need to have a plan.


    _________________
    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol
    shiloh
    shiloh


    Posts : 1050
    Join date : 2011-03-16
    Age : 66
    Location : Akbar Ra

    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam Empty Re: The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam

    Post  shiloh Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:36 am


    The Reporting of Information of Events associated with Islam A-2f-2f2-bp-blogspot-com-2f__hspjzfc024-2fsohzw5snkzi-2faaaaaaaabla-2fqyvsjcvgrtu-2fs320-2fkaaba-jpg


    Have you ever wondered why so many Muslim men are dedicated to killing Americans? Or why so many are willing to blow themselves up to kill Israelis? Or why they are so committed to blowing up random people in Bali, London, Madrid, etc.?

    Orthodox Muslims are doing this all over the world, attacking westerners and their own fellow Muslims alike. Why?

    Because of memes. A meme is anything that can be copied from one mind to another. The custom of shaking hands, for example, is a meme. A melody is a meme. A recipe for lemonade is a meme. Even the word "meme" is a meme, which has just made a copy of itself in your mind.

    One of the characteristics of memes is they can evolve because some memes are better at making copies of themselves than other memes. They get more copies of themselves into other minds.

    So memes compete with each other and evolve. Part of the way they become better at making copies is to join together with other memes in a mutually-supporting group. A combination of memes (known as a "memeplex") is often able to get itself into more minds than single memes.

    From a memetics standpoint, a religion is a memeplex — collection of memes. One of the memes might be, for example, "This is a holy book."

    And the holy book itself is, of course, a collection of memes.

    Let's look at how religious memeplexes evolve and compete. To begin with, let's assume we already have a religion established. It already has a holy book and millions of people already have a copy of the memeplex in their minds.

    And then there is a slight variation.

    The original memeplex had a "live and let live" attitude, and never tried to encourage its followers to get converts. But then someone comes up with the idea that if you can persuade a non-believer to become a believer, you earn some sort of spiritual merit. You are saving souls, and your chances of getting into heaven are better.

    Okay, now you have two variations on the same memeplex: One says "live and let live." The other motivates people to spread the memeplex to others.

    After a thousand years, which of the two variations will have more copies in the minds of people? I'm betting on the motivated-to-spread-it version.

    Let's assume the motivated memeplex is more successful. Does that mean it makes people happier? Or more successful in life? Or have healthier children? No. Just because a memeplex is successful doesn't mean it benefits any of the people holding the memeplex.

    The same is true in genetics. Contrary to common sense, a successful gene doesn't necessarily benefit the organism. It is "successful" in the sense that it has made lots of copies of itself and is found in many organisms. But it may actually be harmful for the organism. For example, if there is a gene for alcoholism, and if drinking causes someone to have more children (or start having children younger) than someone who doesn't drink, over thousands of years, the alcoholism gene would be more successful than the non-alcoholism gene even though it is bad for each individual person carrying the gene.

    In the same way, the success of a meme doesn't necessarily mean it's good for the person holding that meme.

    If a memeplex says it is wrong to use contraception and wrong to masturbate, that memeplex would get itself copied into more minds than an identical memeplex without these two added memes (assuming offspring would be taught the memeplex too).

    So the hapless believer, trying to follow the rules and be a good person by avoiding the evils of contraception and masturbation, would have more children than he might want or could afford, causing him to work overtime to support them — working two jobs if he must. It sends him to an early grave, but puts more copies of that memeplex into the minds of future generations than someone without those two memes.

    So the memeplex has used the man for its own purposes, or at least that's one legitimate way to look at it. And it's a way that sheds new light on Islamic terrorism, which is why I've spent so much time explaining this idea.

    The three elements that make for a successful meme are fecundity, fidelity, and longevity. In other words, if a meme makes lots of copies of itself, copies itself accurately, and lasts long enough to make copies into other minds, it is a successful meme. All else being equal, the meme that makes more copies, or copies with more fidelity, or lasts longer in the mind, will always out-compete a meme that does any of these less effectively.

    Now, with that understanding, here's my point: If you were going to deliberately design a combination of memes with the purpose of making a memeplex that could eventually dominate the world — one that would eventually out-compete every other memeplex — you would be hard-pressed to do better than Islam.

    Let's look at some of the individual memes within the Islamic memeplex:

    1. A standardized version of the memeplex is written down, which makes for perfect replication fidelity. This is something basic to several religions and isn't an Islamic invention, but it is an important factor in the success of Islam.

    Something only transmitted orally can change over time, but something written will be identical a thousand years from now, and with modern printing presses, can be reproduced in the millions, giving it enormous fecundity and fidelity.

    2. The Koran includes instructions for its own spread. It tells believers they must spread Islam. It is their holy duty to bring Mohammad's warnings and Islamic law to every corner of the world.

    3. The memeplex includes instructions for its own preservation, protection, and replication fidelity. The Koran, the most important of the Islamic holy books, directly tells its followers that they can never change or modify or "modernize" any of the teachings within the memeplex. It is a capital sin to try to do so. The memeplex ensures its own preservation this way.

    These first three memes are pretty standard for several successful religions. But now it gets interesting...

    4. Islam commands its followers to create a government that supports it. This may be one of the most brilliant innovations in Islam. Islam is the only religion that uses it. Other groups of religious people have had political aspirations, but no other major religious group orders its followers — as a religious duty — to create a government that follows its own system of law.

    Islam has a system of law, called Shari'a, and all Muslims are obligated to continually work toward making their government — wherever they are — follow it. Because of some of the other memes added to Islam, you will see that this political addition to the memeplex has significant consequences. I think this is Islam's most brilliant innovation, and also the most terrifying to non-Muslims.

    5. Permission to spread the memeplex by war. This is another brilliant innovation. Although some other religions have spread themselves using force, they had very little justification from their own religious doctrines.

    Not so with Islam. Expanding by conquest is very much accepted and encouraged by the memeplex. The poor non-Muslims not living in an Islamic state need to be saved from the sin of following laws other than Allah's. If they won't voluntarily change their laws to Shari'a, then it is the duty of Muslim warriors to insist. The world cannot be at peace until every government on earth follows the laws of Allah.

    Mohammad's own experience showed the example — an example, says the Koran, that every Muslim should follow. For ten years Mohammad tried to spread Islam by peaceful means. After ten years he had a paltry 150 converts. But he changed tactics and started using warfare, slaughter, executions, and assassination, and in a relatively short time, he converted tens of thousands, and after his followers died, they used the same tactics and converted millions.

    The use of warfare combines powerfully with the instruction to create an Islamic state. So Islam spread quickly as their armies got bigger. They conquered and set up Islamic states, most of which have lasted to this day, and as you'll see, the laws within an Islamic state make it very advantageous to convert to Islam.

    This is one of the most effective methods ever invented for getting a memeplex into huge numbers of minds. It's a method of control and indoctrination similar to those used successfully in communist and totalitarian states. But as you discover below, Islam makes unique use of the power of the law to enforce complete conversion to the memeplex.

    6. Lands must be conquered. Lands that Islam has lost must be reconquered, like Spain and Israel, for example. The Islamic empire must continually expand. Contraction is bad, expansion is good. So if a land was once Islamic and now it is not, that is contraction, and must be remedied.

    According to this meme, the earth is Allah's. If there are parts of the earth not following Islamic law, it is the duty of the faithful to gain control of that land and establish Shari'a. It is a sin to let it be.

    7. The memeplex provides for new soldiers by allowing polygamy. A Muslim man can marry up to four wives, and he can have sex with as many slave girls as he wishes.

    The Koran especially encourages men to marry widows. This is an important meme to add if you are going to be losing a lot of soldiers in war. You need some way of replenishing your army. You don't want the memeplex to die out from a lack of offspring.

    8. It is a punishable offense to criticize Islam. You can see why this one is a good supporting meme for the memeplex. It helps curb any memes that would reduce the authority of Islamic memes. This one, like many of the others, is good for the memeplex, but bad for people. This one limits freedom of speech.

    9. You can't leave Islam once you're in. This is an interesting one. It is actually illegal in Islamic states to convert out of Islam. This is a critical part of Shari'a law. Someone who has rejected Islam who was once a Muslim is an "apostate." This is a crime and a sin, and the punishment for it is death (and eternal damnation in hell thereafter).

    Obviously, you can see why this meme has been included in the memeplex, but this one has actually caused Islam a problem because those who are following Islam to the letter consider more "moderate" Muslims (those who want to ignore or alter the more violent passages of the Koran) to be apostates. Since the punishment for apostates is death, fundamentalist Muslims are fighting modernizing Muslims all over the world, and keeping many rebellious, modernizing Muslims from speaking up for fear of death.

    Every time a group of Muslims decides that maybe Islam should be updated for the 21st century and maybe women should have some rights or maybe the government should be more democratic, the devout Muslims call them apostates and try to kill them.

    The memeplex is protecting its own fidelity (the original memeplex cannot be altered). This is not good for the organisms (the Muslim human beings), but it's great for the memeplex.

    Another meme in Shari'a law says it's against the law for anyone to try to convert a Muslim to another religion. Again, this is a meme to help protect the fidelity of the memeplex.

    10. Islam must be your first allegiance. This is a great meme to add if the goal is world domination. You are a Muslim first, before any allegiance you give to your family, your tribe, or your country.

    This does two things: It causes a unity of people across borders, and it allows the group to grow bigger than any other entity. In other words, the "Nation of Islam" can grow bigger than any country, no matter how large (which gives the group a massive numerical advantage).

    11. The only guarantee of a man getting into heaven is if he dies fighting for Islam. This is a great meme for creating fearless, enthusiastic warriors, especially given the vivid description of the sensuous delights of heaven.

    A Muslim man has a chance of getting to heaven if he is a good Muslim, but it is not guaranteed. However, if he dies while fighting for Islam, he is guaranteed to get in, and that's the only thing he can do to guarantee it.

    12. You must read the Koran in Arabic. This unites believers by language, and language is a very powerful unifying phenomenon. For added incentive to learn Arabic, another meme says you can't go to heaven unless you pray in Arabic.

    So all Muslims all over the world share a language. This makes it easier to coordinate far-reaching campaigns of protest, political pressure, and war. I doubt if Mohammad foresaw this possibility, but this meme is brilliant, even if it was an accident.

    13. You must pray five times a day. This is one of the five "pillars" — that is, one of the five central practices of a Muslim. Within an Islamic state, it is enforced by law. Every Muslim must pray five times a day. The practice helps the memeplex dominate a Muslim's life, infusing his daily rhythm with Islam.

    It would be impossible to forget anything you deliberately do so often. Five times a day, every day, a Muslim must bow down and pray to Allah.

    Research has shown the more effort a person expends for a cause, the more he believes in it. So this is a good way to eventually make believers out of people who became Muslims through coercion.
    Islam completely takes over every aspect of Muslims' lives. Not only are they required to pray five times a day, they have to go through a washing ritual beforehand. Islam dictates the laws, and the laws cover many public and private behaviors. In an Islamic state, it is impossible to be a casual Muslim.

    14. The prayers involve moving together in time. When Muslims pray, they all face the same direction, they bow down, get on their hands and knees, and put their face on the mat, all in unison, and then rise back up. Again and again.

    When people move together in time, whether dancing or marching or praying, it creates a physical and emotional bond between them. That's why all military training involves close-order drill (marching in unison), even though it has been a long time since military groups have actually marched into combat. There is no longer a need for the skill, but all military training has retained this method because it is so effective at creating a strong feeling of unity between soldiers (read more about that).

    The same is true of any physical movements people make in unison.

    15. A woman is in a thoroughly subordinate position. This meme really helps support the war meme. If women had too much influence, they'd try to curb the fighting. Women in general don't like to send their husbands and sons off to war. But if women have no say, then the rest of the memes can express themselves without interference. By subordinating women, the memeplex prevents their effective vote against war, violence, and conquest.

    The rules and laws (memes) within Islam that keep women subordinate are numerous. For example, she is not allowed to leave her house unless she is accompanied by a male relative. Under Islamic law, a woman is forbidden to be a head of state or a judge. She can only inherit half of what a man can inherit. In court, her testimony is only worth half of a man's. She is not allowed to choose where she will live or who she will marry. She is not allowed to marry a non-Muslim or divorce her husband. Her husband, however, can divorce her with a wave of his hand. And according to Shari'a, he can (and should) beat her if she disobeys him.

    All of these rules keep her subordinate, which helps keep the war machine going unimpeded by domestic conflict.

    16. The only way a woman can get into heaven for sure is if her husband is happy with her when she dies. When I read about this one, I thought, "Mohammad, you are a crafty one."

    This meme obviously helps with the subjugation of women. It motivates her to subjugate herself. It gives her a strong motivation to subordinate her wishes to her husband's, because while she might have a chance to get into heaven if she's a good Muslim, the only way she can guarantee she will go to heaven (and avoid eternal suffering in hell) is to make sure her husband is happy with her when she dies.

    17. Allah gives Himself permission to edit his own work. This is an interesting one. The Koran was written in sections (Mohammad's revelations) over a period of 23 years. The circumstances of Mohammad's life and his religion changed quite a bit over those 23 years. It says in the Koran that if a passage written later contradicts an earlier passage, then the later one is the better one.

    One of the memes in the Koran is "this is the word of Allah." People had already memorized his earlier revelations, so Mohammad couldn't just change his revelations. It would look a little strange to go change anything that Allah already said.

    But with this new meme — that later revelations abrogated or nullified any earlier revelations it contradicted — Allah's methods could change as Mohammad found more effective ideas.

    In his first ten years of peacefully preaching, Mohammad only managed to win 150 followers. But as a military leader and violent conqueror, he was able to convert all of Arabia. The peaceful ways were too slow. Conversion by conquering and establishing Shari'a was much faster and more efficient. So later violent, intolerant verses abrogated (nullified) the earlier peaceful, tolerant passages.

    18. The Koran uses the carrot and stick to reinforce behavior. Throughout the book are vivid descriptions of hell, where sinners and non-Muslims will have to drink boiling, stinking water, will be thrown face down into a raging fire, and will be there for eternity, suffering endless torments in agony.

    There are also vivid descriptions of heaven. In heaven you'll wear green silk robes and recline on plush couches. Trees will shade you, fruit will dangle nearby. You'll have tasty food and refreshing drinks served in silver goblets. To have a chance of achieving this, you must be a devout Muslim. To guarantee it, you must die in jihad (for men) or make sure your husband is always happy with you (for women).

    19. It provides a huge and inspiring goal. Leaders of countries or companies or religions have all discovered that you can get the most motivation and enthusiasm from your followers if you provide them with an expansive vision. An enormous goal. In the Islamic memeplex, the goal calls for a continuous effort to expand the domain of Islamic law until all the world has submitted to Islam.

    Many religions have the goal of converting everyone, but Islam has a method available nobody else has: To expand by seizing and converting governments to Shari'a.

    Once the whole world is Islamic, peace will reign. That's why even terrorists can say with complete sincerity, "Islam is a religion of peace."

    The Koran says it is best if non-believers accept Islam and become Muslims without force. But if they refuse, then you must fight them and conquer them and save their poor souls by insisting they live by the laws of Allah.

    Once all countries are conquered, the world will be at peace. Therefore, Islam is a religion of peace.

    It is an enormous and inspiring goal, and a strongly unifying purpose. It creates motivated, enthusiastic followers.

    20. Non-Muslims must pay a large tax. Once Muslims conquer a country and convert the government to Islamic law, any non-Muslims have the choice between becoming Muslim or becoming a dhimmi. Dhimmis are allowed to practice their non-Muslim religion if they pay the jizya (a tax). If they convert to Islam, they no longer have to pay a tax, so there is a practical incentive to convert.

    But another aspect of this makes it a brilliant meme. The tax takes money away from the non-Muslims and their competing memeplexes and gives that money to support Islam. This is pure genius!

    The income from these taxes (usually a 25% income tax) helped fund the Islamic conquests during the first two major jihads. They conquered vast lands, most of them already filled with Christians and Jews, many of whom did not convert at first, and their jizya poured huge sums of money into the Islamic war machine.

    Eventually, the numbers of Christians and Jews dwindled down as they converted or escaped, until now, in most Islamic countries, Jews and Christians are very small minorities.

    The tax-the-non-Muslims meme helps the Islamic memeplex make more copies of itself by suppressing competing religious memeplexes and financially supporting the Islamic memeplex.

    Several memes within Shari'a law extend this effect. Non-Muslims are not allowed to build any new houses of worship. They're not even allowed to repair already-existing churches or synagogues. This puts the houses of worship of any competing memeplex in a state of permanent decline. Brilliant.

    Also, non-Islamic prayers cannot be spoken within earshot of a Muslim — again, preventing Muslims from being infected by a competing memeplex. No public displays of any symbols of another faith may be shown either.

    All of this prevents the spread of any competing memeplex, and makes competing religions die out over time. That's why today there are so many "Muslim countries." Almost every other country in the world is made up of many different religions.

    One added meme makes it that much easier for Muslims to dominate non-Muslims within an Islamic state: Non-Muslims are not allowed to own weapons of any kind. To subjugate a people, all dictatorial rulers in the history of the world have done the same thing: Disarm the subjugated people. They are much easier to manage, less dangerous, and less capable of upending the status quo.

    21. A Muslim is forbidden to make friends with an infidel. A Muslim is allowed to pretend to be a friend, but in his heart he must never actually be a friend to a non-Muslim. This is one of the best protections Islam has against Muslims leaving the faith.

    In any other religion (except Islam) conversions to a new religion are made because a friend introduced it. This rule effectively prevents that. This meme effectively prevents competition from other memeplexes.

    22. The Koran counsels the use of deceit when dealing with infidels. Mohammad instructed one of his followers to lie if he had to (in order to assassinate one of Mohammad's enemies). The principle was clear: If it helps Islam, it's okay to deceive non-Muslims.

    This principle has served Islamic goals very well through history. And it serves those goals today. You can watch on the DVD, Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West, real-life examples of Islamic leaders saying one thing in English for the western press, and saying something entirely different to their own followers in Arabic a few days later.

    Deceiving the enemy is always useful in war, and Islam is at war with the non-Islamic world until the whole world follows Shari'a law. All non-Muslims living in non-Islamic states are enemies. So deceiving westerners is acceptable. Even encouraged if it can forward the goals of the spread of Islam.

    And so we have the strange phenomenon covered by Steven Emerson in Terrorists Among Us, where organizations in America were ostensibly raising money for orphans, but really giving the money to terrorists. They deceived good-hearted western infidels into giving money to organizations that were actively killing western infidels. As it says in the Koran, "War is deceit." This meme gives Islam a tremendous advantage over memeplexes that encourage indiscriminate truthfulness.

    23. Islam must always be defended. This meme is a primary linchpin that gives justification for war with almost anybody, as you'll see in the meme below. After the enemy is defeated, of course, Muslims are required to establish an Islamic state.

    24. The memeplex instructs on the use of pretext to start wars. The Koran devotes a lot of time complaining about people who did not support Mohammad when he first started his religion, with Allah often condemning them to torment in hell in the hereafter.

    Mohammad was rather pushy and insistent with his religion, and when others felt intruded upon and protested, Mohammad took that to mean they were trying to stop Allah's holy prophet from bringing the revealed word of Allah to the world, so he was justified to fight them and destroy them as Allah's enemies. This is a demonstration of the principle of pretext.

    Non-Muslims of the world need urgently to become aware of this principle. Of all the memes in the memeplex, this is the most dangerous to the West because it removes our natural self-preserving defenses. The use of pretext tends to make the West defenseless against the Islamic invasion now underway. Muslim terrorists are not naive people. They are smart, educated, well-funded, and being used by a very clever memeplex.

    The invasion of the West is underway, and it is being done so cleverly, most westerners don't even know it is happening. (Read more about their 20-year plan to overthrow the government of the United States. Also, read about the Shariatization of Europe.)

    Pretext means you need only the barest excuse to begin hostilities. It means you're actually looking for an excuse, and even trying to provoke others into striking the first blow — of "starting" the hostilities.

    If the only way to get to heaven is dying while fighting for Islam, you need war. And if it is your holy duty to make all governments use Shari'a law, you need to conquer those governments. But you don't really want to look like the aggressor. Appearances count. All throughout the Koran, Mohammad tries to justify his aggression as defending Islam.

    The Koran repeats over seventy times that followers of Islam should use Mohammad as a model and imitate him. So Muslims the world over try to find or create grievances, so they can get a holy war started, so they can fight and die in Allah's cause and help make the world ruled by Allah's laws.

    And because of the rise of multiculturalism (respect for all other cultures) in the West, the use of pretext convinces people in the West who are unfamiliar with Islam. Many people think al Qaeda is angry at the West for having troops in Saudi Arabia. That's merely a pretext. They want all non-Muslims out of the Middle East. Then they say they will cease hostilities. It is a ridiculous and impossible goal, so they are justified in permanent war against the West.

    And it's surprising that so many westerners are fooled by this one because it flies in the face of a fundamental western principle: Equality. What Osama bin Laden is saying is infidels are so undeserving, their very presence defiles their holy places. Wow. What does that say about the filthy infidel?

    Why doesn't this kind of racism or prejudice or infidelphobia (or whatever you want to call it) outrage more westerners? Instead, many think we ought to pull out of the Middle East so these poor offended terrorists aren't so angry with us any more!

    The principle of pretext is to provoke a hostile reaction and then use the hostile reaction as a reason to escalate hostilities. It's the same method schoolyard bullies have used for probably thousands of years: "What are you looking at? Hey, you bumped into me! Now you're going to pay! Nobody disrespects me!"

    25. The explicit use of double standards. Islam has one standard for Muslims, and a different standard for non-Muslims, which always gives the advantage to Muslims and provides incentives to convert.

    For example, Islam must be spread by its believers, wherever they are. But when other religions try to spread their own memeplex, Muslims are supposed to see it as an aggression against Islam — an act of aggression that must be "defended." Remember, Islam must always be defended.

    Another example of how the double standard meme gives the memeplex an advantage: When Islam is defamed in any way, Muslims should violently defend it. Even in a cartoon. But Muslims can and should defame Jews and Christians in Muslim newspapers and television, and they should defame any infidel or enemy, as they defame the U.S. today.

    Here's another example: The Islamic fundamentalists of Saudi Arabia are pouring money into building mosques all over the free world. But according to Shari'a law (Islamic law), which is the law in Saudi Arabia, no non-Muslim religious structures are allowed to be built. However, Muslims all over the world protest loudly and violently when anyone in Europe or America resists the building of more mosques in their countries.

    They don't see the irony in it. They don't feel strange having such an obvious double standard. They are, after all, Allah's followers and everyone else is deluded. Fairness and equality with such unworthy infidels would seem very out of place. A double standard seems completely appropriate from that perspective.

    The double standard principle is part of the memeplex, and it has been a great advantage to the spread of Islam (and the suppression of competing memeplexes).

    26. It is forbidden to kill a Muslim (except for a just cause). It is not forbidden to kill an infidel. This causes a bond between Muslims, fear in non-Muslims, and motivation to become Muslim. This is also another example of an explicit Islamic double standard.


    .......................................................​


    We might admire the brilliance of the Islamic memeplex in an abstract, intellectual sort of way, but it is terrifyingly real. Millions of people try to follow these memes to the letter. And their belief in the memeplex is strongly supported by the side-effects of Shari'a law. By making the government and laws ruled by Islam, the memeplex applies two powerful principles of influence: social proof, and authority.

    Everyone practices the religion in an Islamic state (or they are flogged, taxed, or killed) and no one can criticize it, not friend-to-friend, and not through any media. The psychological impact of this is enormous. Three generations later, it would be almost impossible for any Muslim living in that state to think outside of Islam. The authority and social proof would be overwhelming.

    If you were trying to come up with a memeplex to take over the world, I don't know if you could do better than Islam.

    Of course, just because I admire the genius of the memeplex doesn't mean I'm in favor of it. As a non-Muslim, I am wholeheartedly against it. Remember, the success of a meme has nothing to do with making people happy or healthy. Memetic success only means it propagates well.

    The same is true for genes. A successful gene is one that gets the most copies of itself into future generations. The genes making up a deadly virus may kill millions of people and cause untold misery, but from a genetics point of view, the virus is genetically successful.

    Genes don't care about people. They don't try to make us happy. They are cold and indifferent to our plight.

    Same with memes. A memeplex will use up and spit out human lives in the service of its propagation, indifferent to the pain, misery, or death it causes.

    A memeplex, well-drilled into someone's head and reinforced by the powerful authority and social proof of his whole society, can cause him to blow himself up just to kill others for the fulfillment of a fantasy goal of ultimately attaining world peace and the triumph of Allah (and a harem of 72 dark-eyed voluptuous beauties devoted to his every wish).

    The Islamic memeplex is formidable. It is a force to be reckoned with and we ignore it at our peril. It has already consumed the minds of one and a half billion people, and it is the youngest of the major religions. And it is growing.

    And yet, I don't think the situation is hopeless. Many Muslims now living in Islamic states are trapped and would defect from the memeplex if it were safe to do so.

    And even those who like being Muslims can be released from the hold the memeplex has on their minds. Like suddenly "coming to" when you're being hypnotized, I think an understanding of memetics itself can help undermine the hypnotic effect of the religious beliefs.

    And the first thing we in the multicultural and tolerant West need to be aware of is the formidable memeplex threatening to overtake us. The memeplex takes advantage of our tolerance and our freedom so as to ultimately eliminate it.

    This is an ideological war, so the ideas in the heads of your fellow westerners makes all the difference. And you can help turn the tide. Find ways to introduce these ideas to your fellow westerners. Here are a few ideas to help you.

    And we can help Muslims trapped in Islamic countries find their way to snapping out of their trance. Muslims have submitted to Islam, many of them because they felt they had no choice (or their parents or grandparents felt they had no choice). They are being used by the memeplex. Individual Muslims can free themselves from Islam, and many have, thanks to the web sites like FaithFreedom.org, and books like Leaving Islam.

    I would suggest we not judge Muslims too harshly. Many of them are in some way rebelling against some of the memes, but out of custom, guilt, or because their Islamic government violently enforces the rules, they practice the rest of the religion.

    "Muslims are the first victims of Islam," wrote E. Renan. "Many times I have observed in my travels in the Orient, that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain the others in the practice of religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him."

    Fortunately, Muslims the world over have rebelled against this rigid and restricting memeplex, and that's the only reason Islam has not already taken over the world: Good people, coerced for generations to be Muslims, have slowed its spread by ignoring (probably with some guilt) the worst parts of the Koran.

    It would be nice if we didn't have such a memeplex to deal with. It would be nice if we could all just get along. But sometimes things like this just have to be faced and handled, regardless of what we might rather be doing.

    If you are a non-Muslim and you want to get started helping to curb the spread of the Islamic memeplex and the terrorism it produces, the best thing you can do is learn more about Islam and then speak up to your fellow westerners.

    You will be shocked at how little most people know about Islam. And they will be shocked to find out. And when enough westerners know about it, Islamic tactics like pretext and deceit will be seen for what they are, and will no longer make us defenseless. When we know more about the founder (the one all Muslims should imitate) and the goals of the memeplex, our collective actions can effectively thwart their plans. Our collective grasp of the real situation will bring more rational changes to our laws and policies (such as our current immigration policies).

    The key is what happens in one-on-one conversations throughout the West.

    When you hear people saying things like, "We should pull out of Iraq," or "We're just in it for the oil," or "Islam is a religion of peace," that is a time to speak up, calmly and simply. Tell them about the Islamic memeplex. Tell them what they don't know. Help them update their understanding of the situation. Do this wherever you go, and start now. The situation is urgent.

    Many of the memes that help Islam spread are in your head and in the heads of your fellow westerners. That's the first place to start to fight against the viral spread of this clever memeplex.

    The memes in your head (such as a blind faith in multiculturalism) are not the kind that will convert you into a Muslim, but they help the spread of Islam by taking down your defenses, and even encourages you to spread information that makes the West easier to defeat. You can play an important role in curbing the spread of the Islamic memeplex by speaking up within your own sphere of influence.

    How? When you hear a meme, stop it from spreading. For example, "Actually, what they mean by 'Islam is a religion of peace' is that their mission is to make the whole world submit to the law of Allah (Shari'a), and once that is accomplished, there will be peace in the world. Therefore, Islam is a religion of peace. That's not really peace as we know it."

    But to do this kind of inoculation, you have to have a pretty good handle on the memeplex itself. That will require some study.

    I know you have other things to do, and you can't make this a full-time occupation, but I also know how serious this is, so it will require some sacrifice on your part.

    I have created a curriculum of sorts. I tried to figure out what would be the material you could study that would give you the most critical knowledge with the smallest investment of time. Here is my curriculum:

    Books to read:

    Islam and Terrorism
    The Sword of the Prophet

    Audiobook to listen to in your car:

    Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam

    If you listen to this program six times over the next year, you will have a grasp of the whole scope of the most important parts of the Islamic memeplex. If you only do one of the things I recommend here, this is the one you should do.

    DVDs to watch:




    Islam: What The West Needs To Know
    Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West

    These DVDs are not only good for your own education, they are an excellent way to introduce the ideas to your fellow westerners. After you've watched them a couple of times, start loaning them out to friends. Keep them in circulation. Buy several copies if you need to.

    You can stop the spread of the memes that make the West defenseless only by having a sufficient amount of knowledge.

    When you hear someone imply that the United States brought the terrorists into existence with their bad foreign policy, how will you answer? One possible way to bring the whole thing into perspective is to give a brief history of jihad. During the last great jihad, Islamic forces conquered Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, and Serbia, and they were at the Gates of Vienna in Austria in 1683, when their forces were finally defeated.

    In other words, they were violently attacking and defeating westerners (non-Muslims) before the United States had even been created.

    This is not to say some of the United States foreign policies have left much to be desired. But the Islamic memeplex has a longer history and has merely used political mistakes as a pretext to engage in warfare, as they have since the beginning. If you don't know any of this, it would be easy to see things as the terrorists want you to see them, and in fact, many westerners have bought the pretexts hook, line, and sinker.

    Study that material, and start right away. The Islamic memeplex is out to take away freedoms and human rights. After millions of people have fought against tyranny and died to gain the rights and freedoms we enjoy today, here comes a pernicious memepex to take them away. And the Islamic memeplex could realistically succeed with terrifying brilliance.

    Take action today. With every new understanding you have, and with every new certainty and clarity you gain, you will feel more bold in speaking up, and speaking up is exactly what you must do to fight a war of memes.

    I have also created a version of the above article edited for readers who know nothing about Islam so you can share the information with a broader audience. Check it out: What Makes Islam So Successful?
    Also, the Koranic expert at Islam Exposed has provided chapter and verse for many of the memes above. Find them here: Amplification of Key Concepts from The Terrifying Brilliance of Islam.

    http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2007/10/terrifying-brilliance-of-islamic.html


    Last edited by shiloh on Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:35 am; edited 1 time in total

      Current date/time is Sun May 19, 2024 6:04 am