Egyptian folklore and The Red Pill - Part 2

shiloh wrote:

Lionhawk wrote:OH BOY! Now look what you just did.

I also have a big smile on my face. Com'on Tony. Tell them the whole story. But maybe not in this thread.

We were actually anticipating your answers to what Brook posed to you.

Aye dear cocreator of the Hamarkhis - the Horus of the Horizons!

I hesitated for a moment to resurrect those discourses, as I did not wish to 'open older misreadings'. However I also knew, that you would understand this in the greater context of 'healing potential new wounds' in others, who would perhaps consider this and all in a deegocentralised manner of perception and receptivity.

And indeed, I added some further discourse for your Sekmetian Liontwinship from The Grander Sirian Remembrances.

No worries Tony. I read your intentional energy in what you posted. I also got some joy out of what you wrote. Also a laugh because I somehow caused a hesitation within you. That's a first as far as I am aware. So thus, I laughed.

The mystery also continues......I see. Will you ever pin it down?

Namaste'

Lionhawk wrote:

No worries Tony. I read your intentional energy in what you posted. I also got some joy out of what you wrote. Also a laugh because I somehow caused a hesitation within you. That's a first as far as I am aware. So thus, I laughed.

The mystery also continues......I see. Will you ever pin it down?

Namaste'

Mysteries exist to be demisted, like Alice in Wonderland!



April in Wonderland aka Alice in Mirrorland aka Cosmology 101

{The 5D-Universe and its Acceleration aka Panentheism-101 aka Gnosis-101}
Forwarded-(under edit) message is at:

http://tonyb.freeyellow.com/id20.html

http://www.thuban.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&id=7FE4FEDE-07E5-4E76-A223-EFA9C335A844&fid=43A515F3-448D-4960-AE1A-3296B2EA2B99

Caveat:

About 100 years ago Albert Einstein conducted certain 'thought experiments' like 'riding on a lightbeam'. Those 'thought experiments' changed the perception of the 'natural philosophers' aka the scientists with respect to the nature of space and time. Those 'imaginations' changed the paradigm of a then mechanistic Descartian- and Newtonian universe into a relativistic one.

100 years ago, unimaginative and puerile minds said: "Huh? You can't ride on a lightbeam"; whilst more receptive and imaginative minds said: "Wow, I can get this, I think!".
Thus the paradigm of the old cosmology became the paradigm of a new cosmology.

April and Brooke and 'accomplices' and all the readers here; ALL are Albert Einstein 'riding the lightbeam' and 'being the total mass of the universe' and so forth in this story.

Dedication:

"May the children of the universe come and find the entrance into the kingdom of wonderland.
They are the children, who are young and pure and innocent in mind and old and wise of heart."

(22) Jesus saw infants being suckled. He said to his disciples, "These infants being suckled are like those who enter the kingdom."
They said to him, "Shall we then, as children, enter the kingdom?"

Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female; and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in place of a likeness; then will you enter the kingdom."

(39) Jesus said, "The pharisees and the scribes have taken the keys of knowledge (gnosis) and hidden them. They themselves have not entered, nor have they allowed to enter those who wish to. You, however, be as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves."

[John Shadow aka shiloh by Matthew.18-4 (KJV) and GOT(Lambdin)]


Preamble:

Little April was born one day as a baby daughter to her parents.
As little April left the womb of her mother's placenta as her previous place of abode, she became independent from her previous residence in the severing of her umbilical cord and in the taking of her first breath.


Big April was born one day as a goddess to her eternity.
As big April left the place of her unboundedness, she became forgetful of whence she had come in her stepping into the Mirror of Eternity dividing the unboundedness from the boundedness.

This was because the outside of the Mirror of the Eternity of the unboundedness became a Mirror of the Limits - the Mirror of Infinity on the outside was also a Mirror of the Finity on the inside. It was the twosidedness of the Mirror which allowed this distinction between the infinite and the finite to be made. Without April choosing to explore this twosidedness of the mirror, the mirror would have remained a Onesided Mirror of the Unborn April.

As April entered the Mirror of Oneness; she found herself in a room, which was the size of a cube and which had mirrors all around as faces or walls and which could and seemed to also accomodate a curving away. Wherever April looked, she saw her own reflection in the mirror. This mirror must be a spherical mirror of some sort, April thought.
Then April noticed another strange thing. This room, she was in, was getting bigger.
The room was getting bigger but also seemed to slow down in the rate of expanding.
Then April saw another thing; whenever she looked closer into the mirror in front and all around herself; she saw that there semed to be a partially obscured window in the mirror. It was like the spherical mirror was semitransparent.
In the far distance, there was another mirror and there was space between the expanding room, April was in and that far away mirror. April's room seemed to get bigger in trying to reach the mirror far away, yet visible.
This visible mirror in the far distance seemed to be stationary relative to April's expanding room.

April then realised, that should her room be measured by some ruler or meterstick; then the ruler in her room would be different from a ruler which would measure the distance from her to the far away mirror.
Her room was expanding and so she would need an expanding ruler; but it was perfectly ok to use a fixed ruler to measure the distance from her to the far away mirror, which remained at rest relative to herself.
In particular, should April measure her room to be say 10 meters across; then a 1 unit meter stick applied for the far away mirror would continue to shrink as applied to April's room as the 10 meters would become the distance to the far away mirror upon reaching it. There would be many more 1 meter sticks in this distance than April counted at the beginning of measuring her room.

'Just how did this state of affairs come about', April wondered.
'I find myself in mirrorland and don't know what is going on here; but I shall try to find out.
Perhaps, if I succeed to find out what is going on here in mirrorland; I shall be able to remember where I have come from - this place called wonderland'.

Inventory:
1. April's Growing Room and her Gravity
2. April throws her weight around, builds a house and finds her Cat called Brooke
3. April's 'Arachne de Gaea' and her Eagle 'Mac the Knife'
4. April visits her Galaxy with Cindy her Dolphin from the Stars
5. April meets Grandpa and peeks into the far future in the age of the universe
6. April learns about the Land of the Dragons between the two mirrors
7. April's Beloveds
8.
9.
10. April's Mum and Dad
11. April has a Baby



Introduction and References (basic wiki):

The accelerating universe is the observation that the universe appears to be expanding at an increasing rate. In 1998 observations of Type Ia supernovae suggested that the expansion of the universe is accelerating^[1][2] since around redshift of z~0.5^[3].

The Supernova Cosmology Project is one of two research teams that determined the likelihood of an accelerating universe and therefore a positive Cosmological constant. This discovery was named "Breakthrough of the Year for 1998" by Science Magazine^[1] and, along with the High-z Supernova Search Team, the project team won the Gruber Prize in Cosmology in 2007.^[2]

The project uses data from the redshift of Type Ia supernovae.

The project is mainly based at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The international team with 31 members from Australia, Chile, France, Spain, Sweden, UK and USA is headed by Saul Perlmutter

The High-z Supernova Search Team was an international cosmology collaboration which used Type Ia Supernovae to chart the expansion of the Universe. The team was formed in 1994 by Brian P. Schmidt, then a post-doctoral research associate at Harvard University, and Nicholas B. Suntzeff, a staff astronomer at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. The team expanded to roughly 20 astronomers located in the United States, Europe, Australia, and Chile. They used the Victor M. Blanco Telescope of CTIO to discover Type Ia supernovae out to redshifts of z=0.9. The discoveries were verified with spectra taken mostly from the telescopes of the Keck Observatory, and the European Southern Observatory.

In a 1998 study led by Adam Riess, the High-z Team became the first to publish evidence that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating (Riess et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009, submitted March 13, 1998, accepted May 1998). The team was managed by Brian P. Schmidt of the Mount Stromlo Observatory, which is part of the Australian National University. The team later spawned Project ESSENCE led by Christopher Stubbs of Harvard University and the Higher-z Team led by Adam Riess of Johns Hopkins University and Space Telescope Science Institute.

Corroboration

In the past few years, these observations have been corroborated by several independent sources: the cosmic microwave backgroundand large scale structure^[4], age of the universe^[5] , as well as improved measurements of the supernova, ^[6][7] and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters.

Density drops
An expanding universe means that density drops due to continual space being added between all matter. If acceleration continues, eventually all galaxies beyond our own Local superclusterwill redshiftso far that it will become hard to detect them, and the distant universe will turn dark.

Explanatory models

Models attempting to explain accelerating expansion include some form of dark energy: cosmological constant, quintessence, or phantom energy, with the latest WMAP data favouring the cosmological constant. The most important property of dark energy is that it has negative pressure which is distributed relatively homogeneously in space.

Divergent expansion

Phantom energy in a scenario known as the Big Rip causes an exponentially increasing divergent expansion, which overcomes the gravitation of the local group and tears apart our Virgo supercluster, it then tears apart the milky way galaxy, our solar system, and finally even atoms. Measurements of acceleration are thought crucial to determining the ultimate fate of the universe, however we should expect the implications of such a major discovery to develop slowly over many years in the same way the big bang model has continued to develop.

Dark energy dominates

As the Universe expands, the density of dark matter declines more quickly than the density of dark energy (see equation of state) and, eventually, the dark energy dominates. Specifically, when the volume of the universe doubles, the density of dark matter is halved but the density of dark energy is nearly unchanged (it is exactly constant for a cosmological constant).



Foreword by John Shadow:

The above references will lead the interested reader into a bewildering kaleidoscope of models and ideas, attempting to 'make sense' of the scientific measurements of the supernovae data collected by the stated research teams.

The final conclusion found in the references and the websearches are however all based on fundamentally flawed physical assumptions.
Whilst the measurements are all validated; the text book and standard expositions of the modern cosmology community are not.
Ultimately all of these valid measurements measured just one thing, namely the light emitted from some object in the universe, separated from the receiver apparatus by a finite distance and a finite time interval to get to the receiver from the emitter and its clocks and rulers measuring time and space respectively.

There are a number of cosmologists, who have realised those "flawed assumptions" and have proposed alternative hypothesises, mainly engaging higher dimensional spacetimes in connection with bubble-universes; ekpyrotic brane collisions and other multiverse scenarios.

What are these "flawed" assumptions? The underpinning "flaw" is the concept of a comoving reference frame (April's expanding room and ruler) creating the space it occupies. Iow, there is no space between the far away mirror and April's room or more fundamentally, this far away mirror does not exist.

April defines the fixed ruler in the constancy of lightspeed c=lightpath X/time t and sets the distance from herself to the far away mirror as lightpath X=R_max=R_Hubble=R_H=ct_{AgeofUniverse}.

As this distance becomes "fixed" in the lightpath and the constancy of the speed of light; the Age of the Light-Invariant or Electromagnetic Universe also becomes fixed in the time it would take light to travel from the Mirror of Eternity to the Mirror of the Limits.



1. April's Growing Room and her Gravity

April then realises something.
'Hold on, my room is expanding as a kind of subuniverse or nested or fractal selfsimilar universe.
So if my room would travel and expand at lightspeed, then it would take a finite time interval, namely the Age of the Universe, to reach the far away mirror.
But what then? Will my room then bounce back and skrink again or will my room shatter this far away mirror and continue expanding at this lightspeed'?

But then April has an eureka moment. She realises that her expansion is slowing down and so her room, in getting more and more the size of the "greater universe" in the approach of the mirrors, could very well never reach this far away mirror yet approaching it ever more closely in an asymptotic approach.
April, knowing a little mathematics, envisages an expanding series of the form: 0/1+1/2+2/3+3/4+...+n/(n+1)+...99999/1000000+...always getting bigger as a fraction or a decimal but never actually reaching the limit of 1/1=1.

This was April's own beginning as the Mirror of the Infinity in 0/0=∞/∞=1, because 0=0 and ∞=∞ to define the inversion of 1/1=1 in the undefinability of 1/0≡∞ ↔ ∞.0≡1 and limited in the mathematical symbolisation in the physicalisations of limits in 1/∞→0 and 1/0→∞ as the reciprocities of each other by 0/1≡0 and ∞/1≡∞.

April then allows for both possibilities of the lightpath in accomodating two kinds of expansion and as reflected in her observation of the two rulers appropriate for the measurement of distances - the expanding comoving metric of the ruler in her room and the static ruler as defined by the speed of light.
April imagines the lightspeed to not only outrun the asymptotic approach, but also for this lightpath to become reflected back into the path of her expanding room, as well as "breaking through" the far away mirror in a refractive manner of continuation.

'But hold on, there would then have to be a fundamental difference between the reflected lightpath and the refracted lightpath due to the intersection of the returning lightpath with the path of my room's expansionary journey.
Why is my room's expansion slowing down in deceleration relative to the constancy of the lightpath', April thought?

'It must be because of me. If I wouldn't be here, then this room would be as big as the "outer space" and the spherical mirror would be identical to the far away mirror and this slow-down would not be necessary.
What is it about me, that slows the speed of this room down'?
April decides to call this tendency her inertia, related to some measurement of her weight and her mass and she terms the "outside space" the gravity acting on her room concentrated in her mass.


Then April remembered something more about her previous existence in the mirror wonderland of the Mirror of Infinity.
This thing called gravity was actually a "force of attraction" between the mirrors.
There was this self-gravity confined to April's room which was attracted to the self-gravity of the far away mirror.
'If now I could express this self-gravity of my room as being information mapped onto the far away mirror and vice versa having the self-gravity of the far away mirror mapped as information onto this spherical mirror; then in this gravitational interaction, I could find out what this asymptotic approach is in terms of universal gravitation.
Perhaps the self-gravity could then be used in a form of a dimensional intersection of the lightpath and in a gravitational physics of self- and mutual interaction of Black Holes as two-dimensional surfaces or manifolds in view of the surface properties of the approaching- and receding mirrors and the information transfers between them'.



2. April throws her weight around, builds a house and finds her Cat called Brooke

April decided to label her own weight as Big-M-Zero or M_o to allow her to use shortcuts in the description of her discoveries about the cosmos at a later stage and when so appropriate.
'Ok', April thought; 'as I am to only thing here in this empty spherical room; I might as well say that my M_o is the weight of this little universe, which has nothing else within it'.


April looked into her reflection before her eyes and became irritated. 'I am the goddess of this local universe and I am all alone in here. Here I am like a little baby, being born naked from the womb. Look at my hair; it is such a mess!'
Then, as April shook her head, she saw a single hair falling towards the floor of the spherical mirror.
April caught the strand of hair and decided to place it some distance away from her, someplace in her room.
'This strand of hair is a part of me and I might as well begin to talk and think to myself, she uttered'.


Just as April retreated something strange happened to the strand of hair. It began to glow in some self-irradiant essence and then became transparent and disappeared to reappear as a pair of scissors.
'What a magnificent magical transformation', April thought. 'This part of me became another part of me, but rather more useful'.
April resculpted her hair in the style of an Egyptian queen from the Nile and an imaginary scenario which seemed to flash from nowhere into her mind.
April cut a number of strands of hair and then distributed the strands all around her room.
'Perhaps the magic in this room will give some more useful tools and surprises', so she thought.

The magic started with walls, stairways, doors and windows and some strands of hair turned into furniture, ornaments, utilities and computers.

'Wow, all this is part of me and seems to be a redistribution and transformation of part of my total weight M_o.
I shall honour this room of mine, where I did begin my magic tricks as my "Special Room", my sanctuary, where I shall treasure the little circular window through which I can see the far away mirror. This shall become my "Special Place" where I shall try to figure out what is going on in this spherical universe of mine; both qualitatively in the telling of "My Story" and quantitatively in a formal language of science and of mathematics'.

April explored, arranged and defined "her room", which had become "her house" in her "throwing her weight around".
'I'll have to figure this gravity thing out', April pondered; 'but now I know that whatever I am gravitationally, can be partitioned and made into many smaller and interrelated parts'.

April cut another single strand of her hair and looked at it.
'If you just could talk to me; I now have discovered the magic of the universe, but have noone to talk to'.
With these words, the strand of hair became luminous, transparent and then metamorphosed into a ginger cat.
'Meow Omm meow', said Brooke, the cat as she looked at April.
'Part of me has become a cat', April shouted exuberantly; 'now I have another living thing in my universe and now I can gravitationally interact with myself to solve the mysteries'!

'It's better than that April', said Brooke - 'I am a talking cat from wonderland'.

'And I am a goddess too', continued Brooke; 'just like you and just like you I have entered the Mirrorland of the Limits from the outside of the Mirrorland of the Infinity.
I am your cat in this room and simultaneously you are my cat in my room. Yet there is only the one room or should I say this house, which is a town and a city and a continent and a planet and a solar system and a galaxy and a galaxy group and a supercluster all nested in selfsimilarity in the universe, limited however in the little circular window.

There are strands in your hair, which are many many things April. I have learned this from some of my broken fingernails; some turned into things and others changed into crystals, plants, animals and intelligences of all sorts.
Some of those sentiences know about philosophy and science and what the expanding room signifies in the greater order of things.
I have learned some things, but not everything. There is much to explore and to discover and as four eyes see more than two; the selfrelativity between us has engaged this communication.
I have become one brick in your house and you have become one brick in my individuated house'.

'How wonderful', said April. 'I understand you are like a biological somatic cell or a neuron in my body and so am I in yours'.

'Indeed', replied Brooke 'and allow me to inform you about this gravity thing, as far as I myself understand it from the information given by the natural philosophers.
You Big-M-Zero April is the key. As you have seen, you can easily take part of you and transform its energy into other forms. It doesn't matter if you term this the magic of evolution or the magic of technological inventiveness.
The strand of hair of you, which you experience as your cat Brooke is mapped or mirrored in a strand of my hair with the result, that I have a cat called April in my selfrelative universe.

You know the little circular loop in our special rooms; the one which shows us the far away mirror?
Your M_o being here is mapped as my M_o being there and vice versa. We are total reflections of each other on the grandest scale possible; namely the scale between the Inside Mirror here and the Outside Mirror far away.
So only in the partiality of ourselves are we each other's cat. I have found out, that this partiality of distributing our weight around in this spherical universe defines two sorts of gravity.
The one here in our houses is a local gravity, which acts differently to the overall gravity where the weights are not distributed in the planets, stars, galaxies, superclusters and so on.
So in here the laws of physics become locally applied as in the formulations of General Relativity, where the matter curves space and space interacts with the matter in a dynamical way of those things termed the metrics.
But "out there", the spacetime curvature acts nonlocally in treating the mirrors as the only occupants of the "collectrively and holistically integrated" extra-dimensional spacetime.
Our M_o's are so mapped as overall gravities and obey mathematical and physical laws of nature, which are much simpler than the laws of gravity of the local universe. This is because the local gravity is of a lower dimension, than the encompassing gravity.

You and I are explicitely defined in being made up of minimum masses. These minimum masses m_min are however not the same in the two dimensions , say the spherical inside and the extraspherical or toroidal outside, namely the spacetime from outside the loopey window to the far away mirror.

Ok, April, I'll try to recall something one of the natural philosphers has said and written.

N.m_minc²=G_oM_o²/R_min
is the formula for the Gravitational Potential Energy between our two M_o's and where N counts how many of those 'smallest possible' weight bits are in the 'higher dimension' of the 'higher dimensional' gravity. I recall the cosmologist saying, that the R_min is a particular location within this room and which is symmetrically coupled to the M_infinity=M_∞ , which is the Big M-Infinity allowing the far away mirror to become gravitational from the higher dimension.
So it is like this in the greater picture. The M_o is a form of energy, which can be expressed in the gravitational potential energy (GPE) as a gravitational self-interaction. This is the idea that things can collapse 'under their own weight'.
Then the GPE expressed in Einstein's mass-energy equation E=mc² becomes reformulated as 'holes in spacetime' and are called 'Black Holes' with a characteristic size R_{Schwarzschild}=R_S=2G_oM/c². This describes a 'curvature of spacetime' and related as to why this house seems to be a spherical enclosure.

The GPE between the M_o's, namely you and I is so different from the GPE between the M_∞ and the M_min, the latter being the particular Big-M, which is smaller than our totality M_o's, and so can be the coupling Big-M to the Big-M-Infinity'.

'Yes, I see the difference', April replied. 'Both of our M_o's are within the smaller spherical universe and being the same, can be mapped onto the far away mirror respectively. But the M_infinity must be coupled to something in this smaller spherical universe, as the Big-M-Infinity is not in the smaller universe. And because the M_o's are taken, the particular Big-M must be smaller than our totals and also therefore this partitioning of M_o becomes possible'.

'Yes, April and now the GPE looks just a little different and relates to something the scientists call the Zero-Point-Energy or ZPE.
You see the m_min's are not mass at all, but become so in the redistribution of the total mass of the spherical universe in our houses.
The m_min's are actually massless superstrings and so both you and I are physically speaking just a collection of superstrings or supermembranes.
The smallest possible supermembrane has this minimum mass equivalent, which can become inertial from a previous noninertial state, namely that of a massless bosonic supermembrane.

This is defined by the physicists as a minimum ZPE-Oscillator:
E_min=½hf_min=½kT_min=½m_minc².

So now the GPE for the mass partition inside the smaller universe of our houses couples to the Infinity-Mass like:

N.½m_minc²=G_oM_∞M_min/R_min

Putting the GPE's for the gravitational self-coupling and the mutual dimensional coupling together,
then shows that 2M_∞M_min=M_o².
What this M_min is and how it helps to solve the gravitational mysteries I don't know as yet. Perhaps we can work on this together. This is one of the reasons I decided to become your talking cat, to allow our two houses as the one M_o to interact across the dimensions'.
'It seems, that gravity is a leaking interaction from those higher dimensions', April replied.



3. April's 'Arachne de Gaea' and her Eagle 'Mac the Knife'

One day, April was in her "special room", which she had named Arachne de Gaea or the "Spider of Gaia". Brooke had run off into another room in April's house to do her own thing; conversing with some of the old philosphers, she had met and for the purpose to find out more about the purposes of the duality between the wonderland and the mirrorland.

April had manifested many more "creatures" as part of herself, including Billy the Terrier, who loved to catch and chase little white balls in one of April's rooms, which had manifested as a big park.
Then one day in her "special room" some part of April magically transformed into a big hairy spider, who then wove a big web in a corner of the "special room" and as it expanded so did this intricately woven spider's web.


April then knew that this was a symbol for her sanctuary, a protector of sorts as Grandma Spider-Woman.
April did not know what her house needed protection from; but she thought it possible that some parts of herself, being alive as themselves, could possibly forget where they had come from, namely from April and could then begin not to like her any more in their forgetfulness.
So Arachne de Gaea was April's own remembrance not to forget, that the parts of herself, which might begin to attack her in some fashion, were truly parts of herself, which had forgotten their origins.

So one day, April peered through the loopey window to see herself in the far away mirror.
'I wonder if Arachne de Gaea is also a remembrance for myself as the goddess', April thought.
'It must be', April realised. 'I entered mirrorland from the opposite direction and the image of the far away mirror is here within this my own sanctuary.
If Brooke is right and the expansion of this place of the spider can never reach the far away mirror because of its asymptotic deceleration, then it would be ultimately futile to engage in whatever journey within mirrorland to reenter wonderland.

As manifested goddess in 3-dimensional mirrorland I can then never hope to rediscover myself as a 4-dimensional goddess in wonderland again'.

'But you can go backwards and where you entered right in this room', said Grandma Spiderwoman.

'Wow', exclaimed April; 'this is the first time this spider talked; but if Brooke the Cat can talk, maybe all living things in my house are enabled to talk in some way.
Yes, Grandma is right', thought April; 'I can never get to my final destination of the far away mirror of this, my expanding house, in going forwards; but in retracing my steps backwards I don't have to go far at all'.

So April walked backwards towards the image of the far away mirror on the wall in her special room - and got stuck.
Try as she might, she could not pass through the wall of the spherical mirror from which she had entered mirrorland from wonderland.

'I am well and truly trapped in my house', April thought. 'Why was it so easy to be born into this place and yet it seems impossible to leave this place'.

'You are required to realise your image in the far away mirror my dear', Grandma Spiderwoman spoke again.
'You are stuck in the 3rd space-dimension for the reason to manifest the boundlessness of wonderland in the limitations of mirrorland.
Though you cannot reach the far away mirror in using the tools of the 3rd dimension, you can do so using the tools of the 4th dimension of space.
Turn around and look into the image of the image of yourself. The goddess April in the inaccessible far away mirror is reflected in the goddess April you can touch on the mirror on the wall.
"Who is the prettiest goddess of them all" - you are, because all goddesses are you as the image in the far away place and yet individuated in the special rooms in the one house'.

'Ah', said April, 'I got it. I am in my special room and Brooke and Billy are in their special rooms; and all of us are looking at our individiuated images within those rooms, but become the "prettiest and most splendid unified image" in the far away mirror.
Then I am stuck in mirrorland, because I am an individuated goddess'.

'You got it my darling daughter', said Grandma Spiderwoman.
'Allow me to introduce to yourself yet another part of you. It is a natural philosopher like the ones Brooke has mentioned to you. Have a look at your right side April'.

April looked to her right and saw a majestic looking eagle appear, sitting on a branch of an old oaken tree, which had materialised simultaneously with the eagle.

April saw sharp talons on the eagle, with whom he clawed the oaken branch.
'How are you eagle', April said. 'You are some fearsome creature of mine and I shall call you Mac the Knife due to your ferocious looking demeanour'.

'Hello my dear', said Mac the Knife; 'yes I have come to share with you some of the wisdom of the natural philosophers. I am an old warrior April. I have been around this house for a long time; even before you entered mirrorland and even before you did discover the magic in this place.

But as soon as Grandma Spiderwoman had woven her web of the protegees; I was enabled to manifest to help you and your familiars on your journeys towards wonderland.
Some of the things I shall share with you might be a little hard to understand at first, but with help of all of your friends, the stories should get clearer and clearer in time.

Being one of the 'Old Wisdom keepers'; I shall give you information in a more technical manner; such as the equations which your cat Brooke has remembered from her philosophy courses.

So this room of yours is a mirrorland room and this room expands towards the far away mirror.
If you now try to measure distances in this room, your rulers will expand in the same way as the room to remain consistent. A displacement of 10 metersticks can only remain 10 metersticks, if the meterstick changes into a 2 meterstick, when the room as expanded to double its size of the time of the 1 meterstick. So using the 1 meterstick as a "metric" will cause you trouble to accurately measure the distance to the far away mirror.

In technical language of the natural philosophers using a 3D perspective then; the metric expansion is thought to "stretch" the metric, causing all sorts of difficulties to determine the distances to cosmological objects in the varying distance scales and its relationship to the postulates of Special Relativity and its lightspeed invariance as the constancy of the speed of light.


For an example: If in 1 billion years the metric stretches to double the size it was when say a star emitted a lighpulse; then the time of the emission of the light 1 billion years later would not infer a distance of 1 billion lightyears but a distance of 2 billion lightyears relative to the observer, measuring the lightpulse after 1 billion years.

This scenario would disallow utility of the Special Relativity formalism, especially the Relativistic Doppler Effect, because the stretching of space could exceed lightspeed.

In your case however; the application of Special Relativity is both sufficient and appropriate, as long as the "light emitters" are measured in the fixed metric of the far away mirror space.

Applying Occam's Razor of the parsimony, crystallizes a preferred cosmological model immediately.

A major understanding for you so is the realisation that you should use a "fixed" meterstick of the lightspeed invariance in measuring the distance between the two mirrors as a reference standard; the one you entered from and the far away one. But you see, you cannot measure anything, because you do not know how distant the far away mirror is'.

'So what do I do', asked April and wondering if Mac the Knife knew the answer to his own disposition'?

'Hehe', Mac the Knife giggled to himself. He knew what April was thinking, being an enlightened part of her; 'I do know the answer my dear. The answer is found in knowing how the far away mirror got there in the first place.

Whilst the universe expands, this expansion in 4-dimensional Euclidean-Minkowski-spacetime does not require to be an expansion into some hitherto undefined realm, then becoming defined as a metric spacetime by that. The assumption here is the physical universe to be a selfcontained entity without any boundary separating the selfcontained universe as observed from within from the necessity of such observation from a without.
The beginning of this expansion is colloquially termed the Quantum Big Bang, followed by an Inflationary Epoch, lasting a minute fraction of a second in so about 10^-32 seconds and larger than a defined Planck-Time: t_P=h/2πm_Pc²=√(hG_o/2πc⁵)~6x10^-44 seconds by a factor of about a trillion.

The quantum universe is a selfcontained entity without boundary as measurable from within, but the emergence of this entity from its boundless selfstate manifested the entity as a particular boundary as measurable from without by a postulated mirror symmetry.

The Quantum Big Bang did not occur at the Planck-Time, but at the Inflaton-Time t_inflaton=f_min.
Then the Inflationary Epoch of the standard model preceded the Quantum Big Bang, instead of following it.
If this presumption is valid, then the inflaton manifests a boundary for the universe from within and as observed from the without.
The without observer is located at the boundless coordinate of the 'NullTime, which is 0 as a "Singularity" and not physically finitizable like the Planck-Time.
The "Singularity" manifests the Planck-Time as the observer from within however and so the metricication of the universal entity becomes defined in physicality initially.

The Null-Time observer can then be defined as a Mirror without the physicality.
This is like the simple analogy of someone trying to enter mirrorland as an Alice in Wonderland.
Iow the boundless observer without the physical universe is Alice who has entered the mirror and is then in mirrorland and becomes renamed as April.
But Alice could then step back into wonderland with April remaining in mirrorland as Alice's Shadow to become a doubled observer within and without the physical universe and in doing so, Alice would be able to look at the mirror she has just come out from on the other side of the universe and which might be just the size of a room at that stage.

The boundary of the universe is a spherical mirror and defines the inside observer aka Inside-April as being also Outside-Alice depending on her choosing to experience the spacetime of the physical universe within as April or the boundlessness outside as Alice.

It is the inflation, which created the inside spacetime of the doublesided mirror.
The minimum spacetime can be associated with the Planck-Spacetime and the maximum with some multiple of this Planck-spacetime.
It is this maximum, which is referenced as the Hubble-Radius R_Hubble=R_H of the observable universe and it is this minimum which is generally assumed to be the Planck-Radius R_Planck=L_P=√(hG_o/2πc³).
The inflation then manifests the maximum from the minimum in selfsimilarity and the labellings of a holofractal and holographic universe reflected in the quantisation of the minimum spacetime configuration of the Planck-Scale or its string-membrane magnification, say in different string classes obeying particular symmetries.

A particular modification of Membrane-Theory has established the inflation parameters as follows:

De Broglie matterwave speed: R_Hubble.f_inflaton=R_H.f_i =R_Hc/λ_inflaton~4.793..x10⁵⁶ m/s
De Broglie matterwave acceleration: R_Hubble.f_inflaton²=R_H.f_i² ~1.438x10⁸⁷ m/s²

The inflation parameters relate to the Planck parameters in the c-invariance c=f_iλ_i=2πL_Pf_P
The inflaton parameters are precisely linked to the gravitational string parameters in coupling to the quantization of mass as indicated in your discourse with your cat Brooke.
But I shall leave a more detailed exposition just what this is for another time'.

'Thank you Mac', said April. 'These descriptions of yours require some processing. I have understood only your outline, but my recording device here has copied your description in the form of alphanumerical symbolisms and my friends and I shall add your information to our collective data base for further and continuing examination.
But having friends like you, shall surely allow us all to figure out this thing called gravity and the distribution of my weight as the Big-M-Zero'.

'Yes April; you will find that the gravity relating the wonderland to the mirrorland is the Quantum Gravity connecting the large macro universe of the General Relativity to the micro universe of the Special Relativity', answered Mac the Knife.



4. April visits her Galaxy with Cindy her Dolphin from the Stars

One day after awakening from a peaceful slumber, April wished to ask Grandma Spiderwoman a question about Grandpa.
As April went to the corner of her room, where Grandma had woven her web, the web was there, but Grandma was not.

'Where are you Grandma Spiderwoman', April shouted?

'Turn around, I am right behind you in the far left corner of your room', Grandma replied.

As April turned about, she saw another big and magnificently woven web-tapestry taking form in the corner of her room adjacent to the older web already spun.

'What are you doing Grandma', asked April?

'I am preparing your room for its transformation April', Grandma replied.
'You already know that everything in this room is part of you and including myself as your Grandma. But as you are creating more and more things and lifeforms in your room; all of these attain a life of their own as individuated consciousness of yourself. I am spinning and weaving webs in all of the corners to eventually encompass your entire room and everything within it. As you are here in your favourite place; the other rooms in your house can become mirrored in this one and I do not weave in every room, just the one which you occupy.

The weaving of the web of life so unifies all the things of you, you have given away to create your environment to live in.
In some way, all the things which are trying to run away from you to be separated from you as their life-giving goddess; cannot do so and become trapped in my encompassing web.
But this serves a deeper purpose too. Your entire room will become a cocoon for your graduation from April, the goddess in mirrorland to April, the goddess in mirrorland and in wonderland simultaneously'.

'But I can never get into wonderland, except going backwards and in trying that I hit my head against the glassy wall of the mirror', April protested.

'I have a surprise for you April', replied Grandma Spiderwoman.
'You know the web I have spun over there in the other corner; go there and look what is there dear one'.

April went to the other older web and peeked through the webby texture.
There from an egglike construct emerged a snout, followed by a fishlike creature.
'Wow', said April; 'I have discovered a dolphin in a segregated place in my own room.
Hi there dolphin; I shall name you Cinderella, Cindy for short; because you have given me new joy after awakening like snowhite from a peaceful slumber'.

'My pleasure to meet you April'; said Cindy the Dolphin. 'Yep, I am indeed another goddess, who has chosen to play with you in your universe. Do you know what my coming out of this cocoon signifies in the magic of things'?

'No, Cindy', said April; 'but Grandma has said, that this entire room will become such a cocoon. But why do you call my room the universe; there are many other rooms in my house as the original room? This is just my special room as part of my house. I know that my house is the universe, Mac the Knife has said so and so has Brooke my Cat'.

'Ah yes April', said Cindy 'and your Grandma is very wise indeed. She really knows what is going on and she is that old wisdom part of yourself, which you have allowed to externalise relative to yourself from deep within, your inner knowings.
You see, the spinning of the web partitions your special room as an inside and an outside. Without the web, your special room is a holographic image of the universe as part of your house. So subdividing your special room partitions your local universe once more, say into the hologram of your special room becoming a planetary environment as within the web and an extraplanetary or galactic environment outside of the web'.

'Ah, I get it', said April; 'and because you have come from behind the web, you have also now come from the extraplanetary environment of the galaxy this planet is a part of'.

'Yes my sister and now you might understand the wisdom of the elders. They know of the galaxies and the partitionings of the holography. April do you wish to visit your own galaxy'?

'Of course Cindy; are you suggesting we can travel to the place in the galaxy from where you came from as a goddess now incarnate in my room'?

'Indeed April, this is what this web implies if spun comprehensively.
As the corner of this room is covered in the form of a triangular prism of four faces and as your room is a spherical mirror containing your room in the geometry of a cube; you can topologically transform the geometries any way you like for a given volume of the space defined by this room.
Then spinning the web more and more and in letting the four corners converge, will define your holographic universe with you being its center, no matter how you have partitioned yourself to create your own environments'.

'What is the geometrical shape of the web before you dear', the sound of Mac the Eagle interrupted? He had suddenly materialized at the left side of April talking to Cindy.

'Ah, wait let me see. It's an equilateral triangle Mac the Knife', April replied.

'Indeed, and the vertices meet at one of the corners of the cubical room to form a triangular pyramid as a trirightangular tetrahedron', Mac the Eagle continued. 'This rightangled tetrahedron, constructed from three rightangled isoceles triangles and one equilateral triangle is closely related to the tetrahedron as a regular tetrahedron of four such equilateral triangles in the minimum spacial configuration to create a 3-dimensional space in the intersection of 4 equidistant points. This is known as the Tetractys of Pythagoras.


Furthermore this tetrahedron is dual to itself in that its mirror projection through its center creates a Stellar Octahedron whose combined 8 vertices become the corners of a Cube. Then the inside of your cube contains a central Octahedron, another Platonic Solid of which there are precisely five as convex regular polyhedra; namely the Tetrahedron, the Cube, the Octahedron, the Dodecahedron and the Icosahedron. Mother Nature favours the symmetries of those Platonic Solids over all else, due too the mathematical fact that there exists a special geometry based on fivefoldedness, which minimises the expenditure of energy in compressing information as a form of physical consciousness residing in the geometry of space. You can term this the "packing efficiency" of Mother Nature's data. Do you understand this April'?

'Not really Mac', replied April; 'you are using some words I'll have to talk with my friends Brooke the Cat, Billy the Terrier and Cindy the Dolphin about. But yes I see the equilateral form of this web of Grandma Spiderwoman and as Cindy said; configuring the spherical volumes with the cubical volumes will allow to generate such a harmony in the outside communicating with the inside'.

'Yes April and so the entire volume of your universe can be said to be quantized and made up of either vertex-oriented Platonic Tetrahedra in a computational manner or as some sphericity associated with the minimum mass counter N which Brooke has mentioned before as information from her sources - my brothers in the natural philosophers. But I shall exposit on this at a latter time; may I take my leave now dear, I have some business to attend to in regards to another goddess student and her beau, both friends of mine in my universe. You will find them as part of your universe as Caroline the Ibis and Herbert the Yeti'.

'Sure Mac the Knife', said April. 'And I do hope to meet your friends in my universe very soon. This sounds interesting, the concubine of the Yeti as a mythological creature, also known as the abominable snowman is the bird of wisdom of the nile'.

And as he had appeared, Mac the Eagle disappeared and April looked at Cinderella.

'So all we have to do is move behind the spun web in this corner and we will change the planetary environment into a galactic environment', asked April.

'Yes April, so all you need to do is step in and off we go', nodded Cindy.

As April touched the spider's web, there was no resistance. It was like the entry from wonderland of April's birth into mirrorland - effortless.

'How do we choose to travel', asked Cindy? 'We can watch this computer screen here in a kind of simulation or we can use some contraption like a spacecraft to travel in the hologram to my "special room" as the goddess Cinderella on a planet called Akashia orbiting a star named Sirius aka Isis-Sothis'.

5. April meets Grandpa and peeks into the far future in the age of the universe

One morning April decided to ask Grandma about Grandpa. April had wondered about Grandma Spiderwoman's partner, but the last time April wished to ask Grandma, Grandma had begun to weave the second web in another corner of April's room and leading to the meeting with Cinderella, the Dolphin.

'Grandma, where is Grandpa', asked April, musing over the ever increasing complexity appearing in Grandma Spiderwoman's second spun tapestry?

'Oh, April, your Grandpa is rather engaged at the present time. He is preparing your house for transformation from the outside, just as I am preparing the renovations from the inside.
I am afraid, you will not be able to see Grandpa for a while; but you might be able to converse with him over the conduit to the outside, the little window in your special room through which you can see the far away mirror'.

'Wow', said April. 'I thought the entire universe is mirrored in my house, just as I represent all the matter within it. So in sharing my weight, this my house became redesigned in a distribution of my material beingness. This has to do with those galactic seeds, Brooke my cat has spoken about.
How then can Grandpa be outside of my house? You as my Grandma are part of me, as you yourself have said'.

'Well my dear, this is part of the greatest mysteries of them all and you will receive the answers in due time. But knowing Grandpa, as I do, he would, should you be able to talk to him, be able to perhaps give you some hints in a way you can understand now on the path of your life into a deeper comprehension of the partnership between wonderland outside and mirrorland inside.
But I can tell you, that Grandpa is as much a part of you as I am; we are your grandparents after all and so in some way we gave life to you, but you also gave life to us. One day you will understand this in a unique kind of wisdom, which can only be found in mirrorland'.

'Hmm, so my reason and purpose for being in mirrorland is to connect mirrorland to wonderland.
This would account for your separation from Grandpa on the inside with me here in mirrorland and his being on the outside in wonderland'.

'Yes April, this is true, but Grandpa himself, whilst being outside of mirrorland is not in wonderland. He also is in mirrorland, but not like we and your friends are. But he should explain this to you, as he has a different perspective on the situation from where he is. Should you try to discern yourself in the far away mirror, Grandpa might show up. He requires concentration on the selfperception to be able to communicate to the inside from the outside'.

'This is very intriguing Grandma and I shall try to talk to Grandpa about it'. April took her leave and proceeded to the little loopey window in her sanctuary to again discern the far away mirror and her image reflected there.

The more she attempted to discern her image in the distant mirror, the more mentally tired April became. 'I am getting a headache', April thought, 'and Grandpa must be busy. He doesn't seem to notice my concentration and intent'.

April decided to give it a break and have some Italian coffee to wake herself back up.
April had learned to manipulate her environment and to engage with herself and her many friends in some experiential manner.
To keep herself occupied, April had developed interactions with things and living beings; engaged in talking to herself and to the things and friends in whatever way seemed appropriate and instilled in April a sense of fun, learning and the gathering of experiences through her imaginative creativities.

'Hah, I have become my own data collector', April often mused. 'I want to find out what this life of mine is all about as an individuated goddess from wonderland, where all the goddesses are as One'.

Stimulated by the caffeine of her Italian coffee; April returned to the loopey window as her doorway into another world, the outside world into the greater universe as the space between the far away mirror and the mirror in April's house, the one through which she had entered mirrorland from wonderland.

'Make yourself comfortable April'; a firm, yet gentle voice suddenly entered April's mind.
'I have heard you before, my princess, but I would prefer you to talk to me in comfort and not under stress and tension or in suffering duress in just conversing with me.
You shall not be able to see me, but my nature of being outside of your universe does allow us to speak to each other from a secondary mode of communication, that of the subconsciousness'.

'Oh, I am so happy I can talk to you Grandpa', April laughed. A great weight had fallen from her shoulders, now that contact with Grandpa had been made.
'So you can talk to me and I can hear you because we are on some subconscious level'?

'Yes April. The way you talk to Grandma is the tertiary level of the waking consciousness. There is a primary mode of the superconsciousness and it is that mode, which directly connects wonderland to mirrorland'.

'Grandma said, that you are not in wonderland, but in mirrorland. How can that be, as you are communicating in the secondary mode', asked April?

'The far away mirror is the doorway or portal into wonderland April', replied Grandpa.
'I am literally located in between those two mirrors, yet in the same dimension of that in which you are experiencing within your house. Then the entire universe as your house is mirrored relative to itself as from within, but also relative to itself as from without.
Remember that your friend Mac the Eagle has hinted as to the importance of the creation of this far away mirror to discover the measurement of distances in the expansion of your universe.
I know, that Mac the Knife has the detailed information for you to understand the size and age of the universe and the scale relationships of those metersticks, the metrics.

But I can tell you, that this far away mirror limits your 3-dimensional universe just like an acorn or a mustard seed does.
A little seed is planted and then breaks open to disperse the, say genetic information, contained within. This genetic information, say of the acorn, then builds the shoot of an oaken tree and which then evolves over a suitable period of time into a majestic oaken tree on whom then wise owls my ponder the stars and upon whose branches nightingales may then sing their songs to the moon.

The oaken tree is your house April. But is there not a sky above the oaken tree and a ground beneath, even its far reaching roots?
Now my dear, can you imagine the oaken tree all unto itself; there is no sky above and no soil below?
You cannot do so because you know of the sky and the earth; but if you return to the seed before it sprouted; you can envison the whole tree in its acorn'.

'Oh, I see Grandpa', said April. 'The existence of the oaken tree is a kind of time travel. It is born from a preprogrammed genetic information; which knows how to build the tree.
So the oak is born from the preprogrammed information to gather the experience of the being, the environmental interaction and then after some time; the oak gets too old to support its preprogrammed structure and it withers and falls, recycling its material essence'.

'Well realised Apri'l, said Grandpa. 'Then the collected life-experience becomes a new seed, for a new acorn, despite the earlier material of the body of the oaken tree dispersing.

Well, dear I shall allow you a little peek into the far far away future. You will have to gather much more background information to understand what I shall outline to you. Mac the Eagle will give you more information about the cosmology, the lightpath and the distances and the timescales of the universe. Your other friends of the natural philosophy will also share ideas and data with you and you with them; and then you might remember some of the things I told you and then this somewhat hard to process information might crystallize in your understandings.

The 3-dimensional universe you live in is not only multidimensional, but extra 3-dimensional. This means that the 3rd dimension is both limited and unlimited. It is limited as a seed for higher dimensions and unlimited in intersecting the 3rd dimension in multidimensionality.
The energy for the birth of your universe is similarly limited and unlimited in the seeds and the seeds of the seeds.
This is called the Arrow of Entropy and the Arrow of Time by the natural philosophers. Some of the 3-dimensional scientist think that those arrows are onedirectional, but they are only in the individual seeds. As soon as a seed's energy has dispersed to a certain degree in a time period of about 4,000 billion years, the old seed sprouts a new seed, which builds upon the dispersed seed as a new seed.
The far away mirror is just the limiting parameter for the first and initial seed to begin its dispersion. This limiting parameter is about 17 billion years and so it takes about 236 "heartbeats" or "breathing cycles" for the 3-dimensional universe of your house to sprout its newness from its oldness.
This does not mean, that this, your house will disperse into nothingness. This your universe will remain as the seed of the 3rd spacial dimension for the seed of the 4th spacial dimension.
Whatever is seeded beyond this far away mirror is also reflected back into the primordial seedling, this your house.
In this way the limitation becomes delimited and the boundedness becomes unbounded in another greater or higher dimensional boundedness and so on.

But in 4 trillion years, the energy in your universe will have dispersed to require a recharging from wonderland. You April, will have given so much of your weight away and you will have gained so many friends; that you simply have to build a bigger house to experience it all.

The energy of the mirrorland derives from wonderland and the cosmological terms describe this in the duality between the Oneness of the Universal Goddess and the Manyness of the Individuated Goddesses.
The technical term is temperature and where this temperature is not the parameter of the kinematics and the inertia, but a temperature of noninertia, also labelled as the gravita of monadic superstrings.
For energy to exist in whatever form, say that of the thermodynamic universe of expansion and of entropy as the dispersion of energy; the antistate for this energy must also exist.
In due course you will understand, that the antienergy resides in wonderland as Alice, the Shadow April and mirrors the energy of April, the Shadow Alice in mirrorland.
The antienergy in wonderland is precisely equal to the energy in mirrorland, but only from wonderland can the energy in mirroland become supplemented. Many natural philosphers know this as the closed system of your house and attempt to reduce everything in your closed system to some elementary beginning or starting point. They have encountered a lot of problems in doing so and some have invented ever more elaborate models to explain mathematical singularities of the beginnings, the Big Bangs and brane collisions and so on.
The simple solution is not to forget wonderland, as with wonderland, the "many worlds" and the multiverses are naturally contained within the greater universe. There are many mansions in mirrorland, April, as you surely will find out for yourself one day, if you have not already done so.

You may meet another friend of yours one day on your journeys. This friend is a part of your weight and he is Johnny Lately the Mathematician; who knows about the special Gaussian Wavefunction descriptive of your house. This wavefunction descibes the connection between the finiteness in mirrorland and the infiniteness in wonderland, finitely reflected in the Riemann-Zeta Bound of the "frozen spacetimes".

The loopey window you are looking through is the metric of the gravita and it also is the metric of the far away mirror.
When your house had reached halfway the distance to the far away mirror in the expansion of its metersticks so 2.2 billion years ago; then the limiting parameter of the 3-dimensional seed was activated.
When your universe was born, it was the monadic noninertial temperature, which created your house as the boundary for you to later throw your weight around in the distribution of inertia.

You may ask certain questions, like "How old am I as the Universe" and this is a very good question at the core of all cosmology.
You will find, that your house has four different metrics and so there are four ages and four sizes for your universe and depending on your viewoint of observation.
Your house as measured from within has the volume of a sphere, but measured from my location, this volume transforms into a special toroidal shape, like a doughnut without as hole.
This then gives the volume V₁₀⁺=2π²R_max³[n/(n+1)]³ for an inertial doughnut age of 8.96 billion years or a 15.03 billion year spherical age. These are the Actual Inertial Ages for your universe as envelopes or upper bounds and these are not the ages as measured by your natural philosophers.
The transformation factor between the "doughnut without a hole" and the sphere is the upper bounded Chaos Constant known as the Feigenbaum-Delta: σ_Fmax=3π/2.

Should you measure your universe from the position of wonderland however, the volume increases due to the 4-dimensional seed activated by the 3-dimensional seed.
Technically the surface on which the far away mirror exists becomes a 3-dimensional mirror just as the location of your loopey window is located on the inside of a spherical 2-dimensional mirror.
Then the outside of your loopey-window surface changes from a spherical surface to a doughnut surface, remaining however 2-dimensional, albeit in transition to 3D, obtained at the far away mirror, not asymptotically, but gravitationally through the monadic gravita.

Outside the far away mirror then the surface topology is 4-dimensional as the orthogonal vector nR_max in the expression dV₁₁⁺=S.dR=2π²R_max³dR from V₄=½π²R⁴ and dV₄/dR=2π²R³

The extra-3D-volume so becomes: V₁₁⁺=n³2π²R_max³ and is measured relative to your inside as an age of 32.04 billion years, but relative to my outside as 19.11 billion years. These are the Actual Electromagnetic Ages for your universe.

The Measured Ages for your universe are however lower, than the Actual Ages, because of the intersection of the 3rd dimension with the 4th dimension.

If the critical volume is defined as V_critical=2π²R_max³, then the extra 3D volume expanding as a 4D volume seed will be V₁₁^-=n.V_critical and as reduced from V₁₁⁺=n³.V_critical
The Measured Electromagnetic Age for your universe then is 17.62 billion doughnut years and 29.53 billion sphere years.

The following expressions must hold and define the multivolumes in labels, which can then become reinterpreted in the form of 'missing energy' and 'missing mass'. Many cosmologists in your universe term this the search for 'dark energy' and 'dark matter' respectively.

Multidimension Factor: DIM = V₁₁⁺/V₁₀⁺ = V₁₁^-/V₁₀^-
Dark Matter Factor: DIM_DM = V₁₁^- /V₁₀⁺=(n+1)³/n²~7.561
Dark Energy Factor: DIM_DE = V₁₁⁺/V₁₀^-=(n+1)³.n²~12.434

You so must have a reduced 3-dimensional inertial volume V₁₀^-, which is given by
V₁₀^-=(n/[n+1]³)2π²R_max³ and provides a doughnut age of 8.26 billion years and the age measured by the astrophysicist in your house, namely 13.85 billion years as the Measured Inertial Ages for your universe.

Comprehensively then, April, your present universe is undergoing an ongoing transformation. You might term it the seeds are sprouting for the harvest and the harvest are the seeds from the seeds and the harvester is you in Oneness and in Manyness'.

'So this is why Grandma is weaving those webs', interjected April. 'She mentioned this preparing of some cocoon'.

'Do you think you are a beautiful goddess, April', asked Grandpa?

'Well, yes, Grandma also said that the far away mirror shows the most beautiful as the oneness of all the individuations', replied April.

'This transformation of the blossoming new seed from the old seed will render you even more beautiful, than you are now', giggled Grandpa.
'Compare yourself to your companion and friend Scott the Caterpillar, April. Like you he will become cocooned in his house and the one you share and like you, he will one day remember wonderland and in an appropriate utilization of the far away mirror; both of you shall metamorphose into the Butterflies of Dragonia as theButterflies of Serpentina of the extra 3-dimensional reality and much closer to wonderland than mirrorland, yet still part of it.

I say, this is enough information for one day and I shall leave you to your comforts now, concluded Grandpa'.

'Thanks for this information Grandpa', said April. 'Yes, I certainly have something to think about and to discuss with my friends. So Scott the Caterpillar and his house is also in transmutation and his house is my house through our partnership with each other; I'll get this.
But Grandpa; I know that Grandma is engaged in my special room of the planet Gaia and that Grandma is like an ambassadora for my sanctuary Arachne de Gaea' Do you have a name and a "special place" too'?

'Yes, my dear granddaughter, I do have a name and my abode is the outside of the inside of Arachne de Gaea.
It is called Draco de Uraeus and my name is Grandpa Serpent-Man.
I am a fiery dragon from Plato's Land, flying about just outside your Cave of the Shadows.

6.

Beren wrote:Shiloh (Tony,Abraxasinas...)

You stated that all this physics came from an ET source-Dragon source.

What makes you think that it`s actually worth of the effort?
Why do you think that being a dragon is the highest form of life?

I still remember what happened at the old Avalon as a result of your work or channeling.
I was attacked as well as many.

Why?

Lionhawk ,me, Brook and more people including Celine and Richard (who banned you upon her request as she openly stated on Nexus forum) were attacked on various different ways by your stream of energy.

My question is , do you realize whom do you serve?

I do not hold any grudge for you or your works as it is your right and free will to do so. I am asking why is this all relevant on your side for us today to become dragons?

Beren, I think you are right that everyone has free will. There is no mind games. Tony is just having fun. Hope this is easier to understand:

source
http://thuban101.com/what_we_do.php

Self Chosen Crazies



To put it very short:




We live the thoughts inside of ourselves. Our thoughts are what we see as "Thuban". We face ourselves with our own minds and memes. We step out of duality and out of Society's norms to go and redefine the archetypes according to our Thuban data. We live and feel all of it as we interact with each other and things can and do get very personal.

Some get scared, some get happy, we cry, we laugh and support each other on this path that we have all chosen for ourselves.

Redefining the archetypes in general means we go and we break the social norm...the artificial moral construct and old mind patterns. Going by Thuban data means we go by the Gospel of Thomas and the knowledge of the Logos. We surrender ourselves to it.

In every day terms this means we face ourselves with our own bullshit, fears, believes...etc, and do our best to overcome it or at least acknowledge that it is there and where it comes from and what it is doing to us and our minds and actions we take in our daily lives. We feel it, we think about it, we discuss it, we experience it, we do it, we argue about it, we drama about it...

As above so bellow...we mirror the story of Creation. The Creator wants his Creation, he misses her as She is part of Him.... they are both one as Core lovers. To see this story in detail you can go and see about Who is You. The Core lovers means that two are as one...they do, act and feel as one...a complete and total mental devotion and loyalty...Love...with physical and overall freedom of choice and being. There is no mirror between Core lovers. He is Her and She is Him...they are HeShe and SheHe.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

to Brook and Lion

One last thought. Face your fears....and fire it up. There are those that will see you get that full blown version of hell on earth......I know Zakk.....I've been in his home and my son used to have sleep overs there at his home because his friend was Zakk's cousin. yep...he's a biker dude..but he's also a family man. I know this because I assisted his wife's mother. His writing of this song speaks volumes.... I know this trend exists...and will play itself out. So best face those fears and work them out.... FIRE IT UP! It is what it is.....

edit

devakas wrote:
to Brook and Lion

Thank-you Ms. D. We love you too!

Its the Formatting that HL is using when Hes Copying and Pasting content over to this Forum from the other One He was bringing the Info from.

The "HERE 4 EACH OTHER" Info's Formatting namely...

I have Deleted said Post that was causing the Issue and have PM'ed Him about It so that We can avoid this type of an Issue in the future.

Mercuriel wrote:Its the Formatting that HL is using when Hes Copying and Pasting content over to this Forum from the other One He was bringing the Info from.

The "HERE 4 EACH OTHER" Info's Formatting namely...

I have Deleted said Post that was causing the Issue and have PM'ed Him about It so that We can avoid this type of an Issue in the future.

Sorry folks. I was just trying to show Brook that I could relate to losing years of work. There is nothing else to bring over from another forum, as that was all that was left (this was the group I deleted).

Brook wrote:

Awesome post Higherlove

You are welcome, Brook.

This angel reminds me of when I ran that cyber support group I mentioned that I deleted. I ran across the code for one of the old group descriptions, and pasted it here. As we can all see, I received a PM about the matter.

Perhaps some day when the time is right, I can explain.

cheers

HL - Simply remove the suspect Formatting and repost the Info. We have no Issues with that.

I was asked to fix the Thread as the Formatting from Your Post was causing Us Issues...

As this was Your Post originally - I could have removed the problem Formatting in It but instead I chose to remove the Post - Saving It for You as I did - Quoting It in the PM that I sent to You so that You could REMOVE the Problem formatting and repost that Info Yourself...

So to say ;

Perhaps some day when the time is right, I can explain.

Seems to imply that I or We as Mods have a Problem with the content of the Info that You've posted whereas We do not.

What We had an Issue with was the Formatting as I've already said so if You want the Info Posted - By all means go ahead and Post It but please note the Issues You might cause as You do. A reduction of such Issues is what We're truly seeking here and nothing else...

Mercuriel wrote:HL - Simply remove the suspect Formatting and repost the Info. We have no Issues with that.

I was asked to fix the Thread as the Formatting from Your Post was causing Us Issues...

As this was Your Post originally - I could have removed the problem Formatting in It but instead I chose to remove the Post - Saving It for You as I did - Quoting It in the PM that I sent to You so that You could REMOVE the Problem formatting and repost that Info Yourself...

So to say ;

Perhaps some day when the time is right, I can explain.

Seems to imply that I or We as Mods have a Problem with the content of the Info that You've posted whereas We do not.

What We had an Issue with was the Formatting as I've already said so if You want the Info Posted - By all means go ahead and Post It but please note the Issues You might cause as You do. A reduction of such Issues is what We're truly seeking here and nothing else...

Thanks, Mercuriel. I can see what you mean by my post. Please know that I know that most folks here are way above that. I know where you Stand.

I did have a knee-jerk reaction, but not entirely sure what that is about.

Sorry, my brother.

Egg on my face over this one.

PEACE

Troy

No worries. There is much Love for You in this regard...

Brook wrote:Adding...conversely why I'm now in a State down south where lynching and cross burning is considered a sport..... Whoa!!!!!!! Talk about facing your fears...I'm smack dab in the middle of what was once mine.....ARGH!!!!!

And one wonders why I keep moving west. I could never survive in the East with that stuff going on. I suspect I got dunked in some past life and drowned for having 2nd sight.

Truthfully Brook, I don't think any of you are delusional. Being more then normal - is normal for someone whose conscious awareness has expanded beyond the cave walls

http://platosallegory.com/TheStory.aspx

The Story

Three prisoners have been chained deep inside a cave for their whole life. They are chained so tightly that all they ever see or experience are the grotesque shadows cast on a wall from a fire that is burning behind them. This is the only reality they have ever known.

Then one day, a prisoner is released. He is blinded by the light outside the cave and astonished to see a completely new reality of people, animals, and objects casting these shadows into the cave.

He scurries back to tell the prisoners the news, but to his dismay, the prisoners do not believe his fantastic stories of the world outside of the cave. For the shadows on the wall are the only reality the prisoners have ever known, and therefore, to them, that is all that will ever exist..

The story of my life.

When the Universe emerged from the lower dimensional complex plane (or manifold) in 2 dimensions into the third space dimension in the timeinstanton, a 4-dimensional spacetime metric matrix, as measured and observed by the terrestrial researchers, also became manifested.

A pretemporal parameter, defined in so called Planckian parameters became however transformed from the 'string time' into a 'normal time' of a quasi-space dimension, which could be defined in the ticking of clocks, i.e. the measurement of the 'Duration of Events' as a function of the Lightpath x=ct with displacement x and Time t connected by the invariance of lightspeed 'c'.

This message shall show how the preBig Bang events, given in the structure of the 'string time' relate to a Minimum Spacetime Configuration and so a minimum possible physical displacement, here called the Planck-Length-Oscillation (or PLO) and also later on as the Strong-Interaction-Constant or SIC. The PLO or SIC is also known as the 'Stoney Length' in the scientific literature (see wiki references below).
In a sense, this SIC illustrates the so called Principle of Uncertainty of the Heisenberg Matrix (of the ZPE=VPE) and the concepts of the 'Physical Action' in the Planck Constant 'h', always having to exceed a product of measurement parameters, such as: Action=EnergyxTime or Action=MomentumxDisplacement in the observations and the mensurations.


One might recall the discovery by Ernest Rutherford in 1909 about the internal structure of the atom of physical reality as a great pioneering step forwards from the 'atomism' (from the Greek 'atomos', meaning uncuttable or indivisible); of the antiquity, as say in the elemental essences of the elements of Leucippus and Democritus (fifth century BC).
The 'atomic worldview' became elaborated upon by Galileo Galilei (1612-Discourse on Floating Bodies ;Redondi 1969.) and Rene Descartes (of the famous cartesian dualism between mind and body) in the 17th century.

Both Aristotle and Plato rejected atomism in favour for a continuity of elemental essences, later refined by Baruch Spinoza in the 17th century, who proposed the existence of the 'undivisible essence' of the unity between the Descartian mind-body divide as the basic natural order of things.

A synthesis of the two paradigms began to emerge with the 'corpuscular entity or monad' of Leibnitz, Newton and Boscovich in the 18th century and followed by the post classical natural philosophers, say ending in Einstein, in the quantum theory of the 19th and 20th century.

In 1897, J. J. Thomson discovered the electron and Lavoisier (1789), Prost (1799) and Dalton (1803) and Mendeleev (1869), constructed the chemical table of the elements from certain conservation laws regarding physical properties and determined by so called electron shells in their basically concentric electron configurations as the basis for all of chemistry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism

A general formula for the MAGIC NUMBERS of nucleonic arrangements in shells is given by the SE_ps-algorithm in the Unification Polynomial of M-Space in 11D, with M denoting Mother, Mirror, Magic, Membrane, Matrix, Mystery, Inverse W from M for Edward Witten, take your pick:

ax³+bx²+cx+d=0 and the Feynamn-Path-Integral T(n)+2 sets the mapping of SE_ps onto Super-SE_ps as the relative primeness of the Experience-Factors in SE_ps superparitive to SE_ps* in extension.
SE_ps* in F-Space (Father or Cumrun Vafa in 12D) differs by the Fermat-Identity "2" from SE_ps in C-Space (Child in 10D) to denote the Union between the binary and decimal systems in: a⁰+b⁰=c⁰=1→2→10. {Details are found in the Francom Adjacency message}.

Subtracting polynomial f(x) from polynomial f(x+1) for the algebraic identity n³+n+2=0, then gives 3ax²+(3a+2b)x+(a+b+c)=0 and specifying a=1/3 and b=0 and c=5/3 as coefficient solutions.

T_MagicNumbers (n) = n[n²+5]/3 for the primary and secondary series:

Primary Series: 0,2,6,14,28,50,82,126,184,...
Secondary Series: 0,2,{2},6,{8},14,{20},28,{42},50,{78},82,{stop command},126,...

As 50+82=132 > 126; the magic Number for n=7; this Out-of-Order sets a natural limit on the nuclear stability in the generation of the periodic table of the atomic elements as consequence of fundamental principles in the specification of Lead at #82 and Bismuth-209 the last stable isotope at #83. {83=WISDOM=GNOSIS in alphanumerical gematria encodings}.

The secondary series reflects the Fibonacci mechanism of always adding successive terms as the Experience-Factors in the 'Information gathering parameters'.

The 2-branes of Helium-4 or alpha particles so become topological surface mappings from M-space into C-space of 4D with the added Calabi-Yau manifolds of 6D as the 'collapsed' or 'conifolded' superstring dimensions of a Conifoldment-Transformation of 3-Tori into a 3-sphere (Poincare's 3-Sphere and Riemann's Complex Sphere); root-reduced as Möbian Klein Bottle Dragon manifold in 2 dimensions.

The quantum geometry of minimally connected surface topologies is then defoned via the SE_ps-Identity XY=X+Y=-1=i²=exp^ip=cis{p} and in the 3D cystallisation of Platonic Solids in fivefolded supersymmetry across the Omnispace of the 10-11-12-12/4=1 dimensional continuum.

We next reduce the atomic scaling to its intrinsic superstring dimension in deriving the Wavefunction of the Omniverse as a Summation of particular and potentially Individualised Seedling Universes. The Universe of the C-Space so is defined as a Protoverse and the Seed of all Seeds potentially emerging from it as phaseshifted multiverses. A minimum of Seed+Phaseshift so constitutes a Multiverse within the Omniverse.

Renormalising the wavefunction B(n)={2e/hA}exp[-Alpha.T(n)] about the Functional Riemann-Bound FRB=-½ as maximum ordinate, defines a probability y².dV for observing a multidimensional universe in some coordinate system characterised by a dimensionless cycletime n, however finstructured in the inverse proportionality between a linear time t and its inverse as a frequency count f=1/t.


The Cosmic Wavefunction is the following Differential Equation:

dB/dT + αB(n) = 0; α=alpha being the Electromagnetic Finestructure as the probability of light-matter interaction (~1/137).

This has a solution: B(n) = B_o.exp[-α.T(n)];

B_o=2e/hA from QR boundary conditions defining:

T(n)=n(n+1) as the Feynman Path-Summation of particular histories under the pentagonal supersymmetry given in the identity:

XY=X+Y=-1=i²=exp[iπ] and lim[n→X]{T(n)}=1

This allows the Normalisation of the [Y]² wavefunction to sum to unity in
B(n)=2e/hA).exp[-α.n(n+1)] with Functional Riemann Bound FRB=-½, centred on the interval [Y,...-1,...-X,...-1/2,...(X-1),...0,...X].

Interval [Y,-1] sets F-Space; interval [-1,0] sets M-Space with uncertainty interval [-X,(X-1)] and interval [0,n) sets the C-Space, encompassing OmniSpace.

n<0 is imaginary as real reflection of real n>0 of the C-Space, metrically defined at the coordinate n=0 mapping n=n_ps, which is the instanton t_ps=f_ss=1/f_ps.

Cycletime n is defined in GR as dimensionless Tau-Time in curvature radius R_c=c.dτ/dt for the pathlength of x=ct and become dn/dt=H_o, n=H_ot in QR, with H_o the nodal HubbleConstant defined in c=H_oR_max=λ_ps.f_ps.

The Feynman Path so sums both negative and positive integers as:
-n...-3.-2.-1.0.1.2.3...n =T(n) in absolute value to double the infinities as the entropy reversal of lightpath x=c.t=(-c)(-t) in the Möbius Property of the 4 worlds as outlined in the Machian Momentum Paper.

Cantor Cardinality Aleph-Null is thus Unitised in Aleph-All, counting infinities as if they were integers of the Feynman Path.

This allows the Feynman interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as alternative to the formulations of Schrödinger (fermions 1/2 spin) and Klein-Gordon (bosons of integer spin) as timeindependent and timedependent (free particle form inconsistent with SR in Schrödinger in 1st order t & 2nd order x), formulations respectively.

The units of B(n) are 1/J, that is Inverse Energy, with A² an algorithmic constant defining Current-Squared and 2e/h the Josephson Constant in Amperes/Joules.

B(n) as the universal cosmic wavefunction describes the universe as a potentially infinite collection of 'frozen' wormhole- eigenstates at n=0.

The timeinstanton 'unfreezes' one such eigenstate and activates the protoverse as discussed in the Machian Momentum Paper.
This then allows the 'Mappings' of the C-Space 'real time n>0' from the F-Space of the 'imaginary time n<-1' under utility of the M-Space interval as 'mirror-space'.

QR unifies electromagnetic and gravitational finestructures in F-Space using the Planck-Length-Oscillation L_P.√α=e/c² from the subtimespace.

This yields the decisive mapping for the B(n):
Coulomb Charge e= L_P.√α.c² ↔2R_e.c²=e* (StarCoulomb Charge)

But the StarCoulomb is Inverse Energy by definition of the vibratory part of the modular dual heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8)=E_psE_ss.

E_ps=hf_ps=hc/λ_ps=(m_e/2e).√[2πG_o/αhc]=m_e/{2e.m_P√α}=1/e*.

m_P is the Planck-Mass and G_o is the initiatory Gravitational Constant, defined in the FineStructure-Relation, which defines the Planck-Length-Oscillation in the unification of electromagnetic interactions with those of gravitational permittivity:

G_o=4πε_o=1/30c with dimensionless c-ether constant [c]unified.

As Quantum Relativity is defined in the charge mappings between the OmniSpace dimensions; F maps magnetocharges e* onto electrocharges e under agency of the 11D-Witten Mirror, which is a Onesided Surface möbian connecting 10D to 12D.
The all encompassing source energy quantum is the E_ps-Gauge Boson, which manifests as the Gauge mediator for the four elemental interactions, suppressing the weak interaction in a primary triplicity however to allow the Higgs Restmass Induction mechanism to proceed in the defining qualities of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity (UFoQR).

The Gamma Function (defining the factorial function), is defined for all n, except nonpositive integers as:

G(n)=∫^∞₀{e^-t.t^n-1} dt = │0.1-e^-∞│ + ∫^∞₀{e^-t(n-1).t^n-2} dt = 0 + (n-1).G(n-1) by partial integration ∫udv=uv-∫vdu with v=-e^-t & dv/dt=e^-t & u=t^n-1 & du/dt=(n-1)t^n-2

But G(1)=∫^∞₀{e^-t} dt = ∫^∞₀d{-e^-t} = │e⁰-e^-∞│=1-0=1

Therefore, the Gamma Function defines the Factorial Function (here for positive integers):
G(n)=(n-1).G(n-1)=(n-1)!
G(n+1)=n.Gn=n!

G(1)=1=1.1={1-1)!=0!=1
G(2)=1.G(1)=1
G(3)=2.G(2)=2.1=2!=2
G(4)=3.G(3)=3.2.1=3!=6
...
G(n)=(n-1).G(n-1)=(n-1)!

If we change variables in the Gamma Function in t=u² with dt=2u.du;

G(n) = ∫^∞₀2u.exp{-u²}.u^2n-2 du = 2.∫^∞₀u^2n-1exp{-u²} du = 2.∫^∞₀.exp{-u²} du = ½√p for n=½

The Integral ∫^∞_-∞exp{-r²} dr = ∫^∞_-∞exp-{x²+y²} dA = ∫^∞_-∞.∫^∞_-∞exp-{x²+y²} dx.dy = (∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²} dx).(∫^∞_-∞exp{-y²} dy)=(∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²}dx)² =
∫^2p₀.∫^∞₀exp{-r²}r.dr.dq = 2p.∫^∞₀exp{-r²}.r.dr = 2p.∫⁰_-∞-½.exp{u}du = p{e⁰-0}=p(1-0) = p for u=-r² with du=-2r.dr

Therefore: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²}dx = 2.∫^∞₀exp{-x²}dx = √p and

∫^∞₀exp{-x²}dx = ½√p = G(½)

A graph of ƒ(x) = exp{−x²} and the area between the function and the x-axis, which is equal to √p. Dark blue is less than one standard deviation from the mean. For the normal distribution, this accounts for about 68% of the set, while two standard deviations from the mean (medium and dark blue) account for about 95%, and three standard deviations (light, medium, and dark blue) account for about 99.7%.

A Gaussian Function is defined in: f(x) = a.exp{-[x-b]²/2c²} for some constants a,b,c and then for substitution Z=(x-b)/c√2 with dz=1/c√2.dx

∫^∞_-∞exp{-z²} dz = ∫^∞_-∞exp{-(x-b)²/2c².(1/c√2) dx = √p and for the integral to be 1, a must be 1/c√(2p) and letting b=m and c=s: a=1/s√(2p)

for

The Gaussian Normal Distribution (Bell Curve), is defined as: f(x)=(1/s√(2p)).exp{-(x-m)²/2s²} with a 'Standard Deviation' s=√Variance and a 'Mean' m.

The transformation Z=(x-m)/s normalises f(x) to f(Z) with a Mean of m=0 and a Standard Deviation s=1 for the Standard Normal Distribution Curve:
∫^∞_-∞exp{-½z²} dz = √(2p)

Comparing this to the B(n) one defines: B(n)=(2e/hA).exp{-alpha.[(n+½)²-½²]}=(2e/hA).exp{¼.alpha}.exp{-(n+½)²/(1/alpha)} with a mean m=-½ and a variance of s²=1/2alpha and so a standard deviation s=1/√(2alpha)

The B(n) is gaussian with the leading coefficient a={(2e/hA)exp[¼alpha]} for

∫^∞_-∞exp{-½Z²} dz = √(2p)

∫^∞_-∞exp{-½{[n+½]/(1/√2alpha)}²}.√2alpha dn = √(2p)

√(alpha/p)∫^∞_-∞exp{-½([n+½].√2alpha)²} dn = 1

√(alpha/p)∫^∞_-∞exp{-alpha.(n+½)²} dn = 1 so satisfies our renormalisation requirements for: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-½Z²} dZ = √(2p) with Z=√2alpha.(n+½) and dZ/dn=√2alpha and for the string-brane Alpha=60pe²/h = 1/137.04707... for √alpha = 0.08542... for 1/√alpha = 11.70671... Mean=FRB=m½ and Standard Deviation s=1/√(2alpha) = 8.27789...


Z=1s=1 for n= -½ ± 1/√2alpha = (-8.7779; 7.7779) for two 34.13% (68.26% total) intervals in (negative) F-Space and (positive) C-Space respectively

Z=2s=2 for n= -½ ± 2/√2alpha = (-17.0558; 16.0558), for two 47.72% (95.44% total) intervals in (negative) F-Space and (positive) C-Space respectively

Z=3s=3 for n= -½ ± 3/√2alpha = (-25.3337; 24.3337), for two 49.87% (99.74% total) intervals in (negative) F-Space and (positive) C-Space respectively


For the 10-dimensional C-Space: n=[0 X ∞ ):
for n=0, Z=½√2alpha=0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41%
for n=X, Z=½√10alpha=0.13506... and Area=0.0537 or 5.37%
...
for n→∞, Z→∞ for the Area to be 50% or half of Unity as per the standard normal distribution calculus
The C-Space encompasses a total of 0.5000-0.0241=0.4759 and so 47.59% of the total multiverse distribution


For the 11-dimensional M-Space: n=[-1 -½ 0]:
for n=0, Z=½√2alpha=0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41%
for n=FRB=-½, Z=0 for the wavefunction maximum at B(-½)=exp{¼alpha}...and Area=0
for n=-1, Z=-½√2alpha=-0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41% as the Image Symmetry for n=0

The M-Space to encompasses an Area of 0.0482 or 4.82% of the 12-dimensional omniversal multiverse distribution


For the 12-dimensional F-Space: n=(-∞ -Y -1]
for n=-1, Z=-½√2alpha=-0.06040... and Area=0.0241 or 2.41% as the Image Symmetry for n=0
for n=-Y, Z=-½√10alpha=-0.13506... and Area=0.0537 or 5.37% as the Image Symmetry for n=X
...
for n→-∞, Z→-∞ for the Area to be 50% or half of Unity as per the standard normal distribution calculus
The F-Space encompasses a total of 0.5000-0.0241=0.4759 and so 47.59% of the total multiverse distribution


The probability of finding the FRB-fluctuation for the interval [-X,X-1] in volume element dV as the Heisenbergian Uncertainty fluctuation in the ZPE/VPE string matrix so is 4.82%.
This volume element defines the dimensional intersection from C-space into F-space via the Mirror M-space in the topological mapping of the Complex Riemann C_∞ -Space about the Riemann Pole as the Calabi Yau Superstring space in 10 dimensions.

The fundamental partnership between the F-Space in n_imaginary and C-Space in n_real is described in redefining the volume element dV in Linespace of the real cycletime n_real=H_ot by the preBig Bang string-membrane physics of the complex plane in 2 dimensions.

The multidimensional 'mapping' between F-Space and C-Space is given by the mathematical properties of the magnetocharge e* in F-Space and the electrocharge e in C-Space:

Coulomb Electro-Charge-Quantum = 'e' = L_Planck.c².√(Alpha) ↔ c²(2R_e) = 'e*' = Membrane Magneto-Charge-Quantum

The Planck-Length is defined as:
L_Planck = √(G_oh/2pc³)

for a Planck-Time in the Lightpath: L_Planck=cT_Planck in

T_Planck=L_Planck/c = √(G_oh/2pc⁵) = 2.0896x10^-35 m*/(3x10⁸ (ms^-1)* = 6.9653x10^-44 s* in string units

The PLO or SIC relates the concept of the higher dimensional magnetocharge as the electrocharge e in the Stoney Unit e/c²=√alpha.L_Planck and the lower dimensional electrocharge relates the higher dimensional magnetocharge as Inverse SourceSink Energy E_ps=1/e*=hf_ps to the Classical Electron scale in 2R_e=Diameter_Electron=e*/c².

The Stoney Units accentuate the Electromagnetic Nature of the Universe and so the Electromagnetic Finestructure Alpha dominates in preference to the dominance of Planck's Constant 'h' in the standard Planck Units. This is referenced in the quoted links following.
The 'mystery' as to the nature of the higher dimensional string-membrane theories is however 'solved' in a cosmology, which allows the concept of mass content and inertia to become an emergent property from a precursive noninertial energy matrix, such as given in the postulates of Quantum Relativity.
Here a massless 'Goldstone Gauge Bosonic' Universe of Gravita is gravitational in the Equivalence of the gravitational energy of the magneto- or colour charged bosonic photon to the inertial fermionic mass-coupled 'particle', say an electron or a nucleon.

As all Coulomb charges in the electric lower dimensional universe are always coupled to particles carrying mass, such as fusion protons in stars like the sun; The electrocharge 'e' can be stipulated to have a higher dimensional precursor in the magnetocharge e* and where this magnetocharge remains independent from the existence of the lower dimensional inertia.
The notion of the colour charge in quantum chromodynamics, the study and analysis of the subatomic nature of physical reality, can so be stipulated to relate to the magnetocharge in a hierarchy of 'particle families', which correspond and communicate to each other across the dimensions.

In the F-Space of the magnetocharge, the standard photon of the electrocharge inertia-associations of the C-Space so is 'colour charged' with distinct 'particle-antiparticle' definitions; whilst in the lower dimensional manifesto, the standard photon is not colour charged and so can be its own antiparticle in the taxonomy.
From those elementary definitions, the mass focused cosmologies can be revisited and the particle families can become redefined, with say the neutrino-antineutrino weak parity violations found to illuminate the stated postulates of Quantum Relativity or QR.

The string-membrane definitions for the electromagnetic dominant cosmology of QR calculates the n=n_present coordinate as a MAT=Mean-Alignment-Time calibration to midnight, November 4th, 1996, local time (+11 Hours UCT/GMT).
This MAT then defines the C-Space coordinate from the beginning of M-Space and so gives a value for the Age of the Universe in C-Space, i.e. the time since the string epoch from the Planck-Time ended in the string classes and the so called Quantum Big Bang, also here and elsewhere termed as the Weyl Membrane SourceSink E_{primary source} or E_ps as half of the Weyl-Oscillator E_psE_ss for ss=sinksource or secondary source.
One can also name the supermembrane E_psE_ss as the Little Serpent Abba-Baab or the Prime Creator-Secondary Creation or some other god-antigod dyad from the F-Space of the Omniverse from the Void=Eternity becoming a cosmogony of Unity and Oneness, experiencing its own potential for separatedness as a cosmology.

The electromagnetic true age of the universe as a protoversal seedling multiverse, so is calculated as n_present=t_universe=n_present/H_o=19.111x10⁹ 'years' = 6.03079...x10¹⁷ seconds.

Rewriting the mapping equation between higher D 'e*' and lower D 'e' as:

1/c²=L_Planck√Alpha/e = 2R_e/e* = 1.1111111.x10^-17=1/9x10¹⁶

e*=2R_ec² and e=L_Planck.c².√Alpha; both have units of Volume/Time² however and 1/t²=df/dt as the timedifferential for frequeny f=1/t and for a period T=1/2pf for an angular radius-independent velocity w=2pf.
The latter defines the quantum spin in quantum mechanics as the angular momentum basis of h/2p.

Quantum Relativity defines the timedifferential for frequancy as the Awareness Quantum: alphaomega=aw=│df/dt│_maximum=│lim(f_ps-0)/(f_ss-0)│=│f_ps²│=│1/e*h│² because of the modular duality between E_ps and E_ss in the coupling constants of E_ps.E_ss=h² and E_ps/E_ss=f_ps².

The awareness quantum alphaomega=aw=│f_ps²│=│1/e*h│²=9x10⁶⁰ then describes the Permutation count of the Planck-Time to yield the Electromagnetic True Age of the Universe (ETAU) as a simple summation of Planck times as the Integral of time over the history of the physical universe in Linespacetime:

ETAU = T_Planck.alphaomega= √(G_oh/2pc⁵)aw=√(G_o/2pc⁵h³e⁴*)=6.26877...x10¹⁷ seconds or about 19.864..Billion years (or 19.864 Gigayears or Gy with a civil year of 365.2425 mean solar days) in string units (*).

The ETAU, differing from the MAT in a factor 19.111/19.864=0.962 or by 3.8% so indicates that the omniverse would reach the potential for maximum self awareness 19.864 billion years after its emergence from the Void of Eternity.
This gives a time period of about 753 million years from the present Mean-Alignment-Time.

In adjusting the maximum alphaomega from aw_max=9x10⁶⁰ to aw_present=8.658x10⁶⁰ then aligns the Planck-Time count to the MAT.

Considering the Variance of the B(n) in the statistical distribution as a function of probability densities; a reassignment of the Standard Deviation for the present time would likewise adjust the ETAU to the MAT.

The PLO=SIC=Stoney-Length modifies the Planck-Time by the factor of √Alpha=0.08542 in the Lightpath L_Planck=cT_Planck decreasing from 2.0896x10^-35 m* to 1.785x10^-36 m* and this reduces T_Planck to 5.95x10^-45 s* by the factor of 0.08542=1/11.707. This represents a PrePlanckian quasitime as the minimum time parameter in the minimum spacetime configuration.
Using this quasitime for the alphaomega would then reduce the ETAU to 0.08542(19.864 Gy)=1.697 Gy and so n/10 or 10% of a Hubble halfbeat.


The Integral: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-x²}dx = 2.∫^∞₀exp{-x²}dx = √p and the Standard Deviation for this integral would be s=√Alpha=0.08542 about a renormalised mean m=0

Generally, for some constant a, the Gaussian Integral is: ∫^∞_-∞exp{-ax²}dx = √(p/a) and for a=1.0395=1/0.962, the adjusted s_adj=√(0.962Alpha)~0.08378=1/11.936.


The B(n) is realised in any arbitrary spacetime in 'unfreezing' the M-Space 'stuck' in between the (-Y,X) coordinates as the roots and solutions of the Euler Identity X+Y=XY=-1=i²=e^ip and so in a sense in between the real cycletime n_real=H_ot and the imaginary cycletime n_i=n_imaginary.
B(n) is assigned B(n_present)=(ek)_SI/(ek)* for the calibration between some measurement system, characteristic for some galactic civilisation (here a Terrestrial System Internationale or SI) and a cosmic one (where the mensuration units are integer based, such as 'c'=3x10⁸ and 'h'=1/15x10³² and 'k'=1/15x16¹⁸ and remaining independent on physical measurement as the output from particular algorithmic data encodings as input.

B(n_present)=(ek)_SI/(ek)*=2.212058948..x10^-42/2.267869087x10^-42=0.9753909..=B(n_present)=(2e/hA)exp{-alpha(n_present²+n_present)}

Therefore: exp{-alphaT(n_present)}=(hA/2e)(0.9753909..)=0.98253415.. and -alpha.T(n_present)=ln(0.98253415..)=-0.017620177.. and T(n_present)=(137.047072..)0.017620177..=2.414793...

The value for the cycletimes n are therefore obtained in the solution of the quadratic:
n_present²+n_present - 2.414793.. = 0 for roots:
n_present = -½ ± 1.632419 for n_real=1.132419.. and n_imaginary=-2.132419..

So t_present=n_present/H_o=n_MAT/H_o=6.03079x10¹⁷ seconds in real C-Space time and for H_o=c/R_Hubble=c/R_maximum for the 11-dimensional seedling protoversal Hubble-Horizon of 1.59767545...x10²⁶ meters* or 16.876 Billion Lightyears as the n=1 coordinate of the 'Hubble Oscillation' as the 'Heartbeat of the Cosmos'.

The imaginary F-Space time n_i=H_ot_i so gives an Imaginary and shadowed Electromagnetic Age of the Universe in EIAU=t_i=n_i/H_o=1.13564x10¹⁸ s* or 35.987 Billion Years.


The 'Unfreezing' of M-Space then allows the singularity-algorithm of the Cosmo-Genesis to manifest in what might be termed the sex-chromosomes of a cosmic DNA encoding from F-Space. This then defines a new physical quantity, termed 'Awareness' as the time differential for frequency and defines 'Consciousness' as a direct consequence from the defining qualities of the magnetocharges as a proprty of spacial awareness deriving from the occupancy of that 'space' as a quantisation of the minimum spacetime configuration defined in F-Space and mirrored in the M-Space and manifesting in mass parametric and inertia associated qualities in the C-Space in a holofractal and holographic omniverse.

The concept of 'Life' is born and emerges from magnetopolic self inductions of quantum geometric entities defined from superbranes macrocrystallizing via C-L-Factor couplings given in the cosmo-DNA as electropolic self capacitances and magnetopolic self inductances.

The purpose of the superbranial self replication on ever increasing scales of the modular duality between sourcesinks (White Holed Cosmic FatherMothers) and sinksources (Black Holed Cosmic MotherFathers), is to establish the multiversal holographic nestings of the smallest minimum spacetime configuration (as the Wormhole or Einstein-Rosen Bridge of the PLO) within the largest (the Omniverse as a collection of a potentially infinite number of Multiverses, all however as phaseshifts of the Seedling Protoverse) - as the cosmogenetic beginning of it all as the 'naked singularity' of the Genesis Boson, aka the Abba-Baab selfdual master template of creation.

Stoney Units

In physics, the Stoney units form a system of units named after the Irish physicist George Johnstone Stoney, who first proposed them in 1881. They are the first historical example of natural units, i.e. units of measurement designed so that certain fundamental physical constants serve as base units. The set of constants that Stoney used as base units is the following:
Elementary charge, e;
Speed of light in a vacuum, c;
Gravitational constant, G;
Coulomb constant, 1/(4πε0).

This means the numerical values, in terms of Stoney units, of all these constants equal one:


Stoney's set of base units is similar to the one used in Planck units, proposed independently by Planck thirty years later, but Planck replaced the elementary charge with the Planck constant. In Stoney units, the numerical value of Planck's constant is not 1, but is

where α is the fine-structure constant. Planck units are more commonly used than Stoney units in modern physics, especially quantum gravity (including string theory). Rarely, Planck units are referred to as Planck-Stoney units.

History

George Stoney was one of the first scientists to understand that electric charge was quantized; from this quantization he deduced the units that are now named after him. James G. O’Hara pointed out in 1974 that Stoney’s derived estimate of the unit of charge, 10⁻²⁰ ampere-second, was 1⁄16 of the modern value of the charge of the electron. The reason is that Stoney used the approximated value of 10¹⁸ for the number of molecules presented in one cubic millimetre of gas at standard temperature and pressure. Using the modern values for Avogadro’s number 6.0238×10²³ and for the volume of a gram-molecule (at s.t.p.) of 22.4146×10⁶ mm³, the modern value is 2.687×10¹⁶, instead of Stoney's 10¹⁸.

Stoney units and Planck units

The Stoney length and the Stoney energy, collectively called the Stoney scale, are not far from the Planck length and the Planck energy, the Planck scale. The Stoney scale and the Planck scale are the length and energy scales at which quantum processes and gravity occur together. At these scales, a unified theory of physics is thus required. The only notable attempt to construct such a theory from the Stoney scale was that of H. Weyl, who associated a gravitational unit of charge with the Stoney length and who appears to have inspired Dirac’s fascination with the large number hypothesis[10]. Since then, the Stoney scale has been largely neglected in the development of modern physics, although it is occasionally discussed to this day. The Planck scale is valid for all known interactions, and does not give prominence to the electromagnetic interaction, as the Stoney scale does.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoney_units

George Johnstone Stoney

George Johnstone Stoney, 1826–1911

George Johnstone Stoney (15 February 1826 – 5 July 1911) was an Anglo-Irish physicist. He is most famous for introducing the term electron as the "fundamental unit quantity of electricity". He had introduced the concept, though not the word, as early as 1874 and 1881, and the word came in 1891. He published around 75 scientific papers during his lifetime.

Education and employment positions

Stoney was born at Oakley Park, near Birr, County Offaly, in the Irish Midlands, in an old-established Anglo-Irish family. He attended Trinity College, Dublin, graduating with a B.A. in 1848. From 1848 to 1852 he worked as an astronomy assistant to William Parsons, 3rd Earl of Rosse at Birr Castle, County Offaly, where Parsons had built the world's largest telescope, the 72-inch Leviathan of Parsonstown. Simultaneously Stoney continued to study physics and mathematics and was awarded an M.A. by Trinity College Dublin in 1852.

From 1852 to 1857 he was professor of physics at Queen's College Galway. From 1857 to 1882 he was employed as Secretary of the Queen's University of Ireland, an administrative job based in Dublin. In the early 1880s he moved to the post of superintendent of Civil Service Examinations in Ireland, a post he held until his retirement in 1893. In that year, he took up residence in London. Stoney died in 1911 at his home in Notting Hill, London. During his decades of non-scientific employment responsibilities in Dublin, Stoney continued to do scientific research on his own. He also served for decades as honorary secretary and then vice-president of the Royal Dublin Society, a scientific society modelled after the Royal Society of London, and after his move to London Stoney served on the council of that society too. Additionally he intermittently served on scientific review committees of the British Association for the Advancement of Science from the early 1860s on.

Stoney's scientific output

Stoney published seventy-five scientific papers in a variety of journals, but chiefly in the journals of the Royal Dublin Society. He made significant contributions to cosmic physics and to the theory of gases. He estimated the number of molecules in a cubic millimetre of gas, at room temperature and pressure, from data obtained from the kinetic theory of gases. Stoney's most important scientific work was the conception and calculation of the magnitude of the "atom of electricity". In 1891, he proposed the term 'electron' to describe the fundamental unit of electrical charge, and his contributions to research in this area laid the foundations for the eventual discovery of the particle by J.J. Thomson in 1897.

He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in June 1861 on the basis of being the author of papers on "The Propagation of Waves," – "On the Rings seen in Fibrous Specimens of Calc Spar," and Molecular Physics, published in the Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, et cetera, Distinguished for his acquaintance with the science of Astronomy & General Physics.

The Stoney scale

Contemporary physics has settled on the Planck scale as the most suitable scale for a unified theory. The Planck scale was, however, anticipated by George Stoney. Like Planck after him, Stoney realized that large-scale effects such as gravity and small-scale effects such as electromagnetism naturally imply an intermediate scale where physical differences might be rationalized. This intermediate scale comprises units (Stoney scale units) of mass, length, time etc., yet mass is the cornerstone.

The Stoney mass m_S (expressed in contemporary terms):


where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space, e is the elementary charge and G is the gravitational constant, and where α is the fine-structure constant and m_P is the Planck mass.

Like the Planck scale, the Stoney scale functions as a symmetrical link between microcosmic and macrocosmic processes in general and yet it appears uniquely oriented towards the unification of electromagnetism and gravity . Thus for example whereas the Planck length is the mean square root of the reduced Compton wavelength and half the gravitational radius of any mass, the Stoney length is the mean square root of the 'electromagnetic radius' (see Classical electron radius) and half the gravitational radius of any mass, m:




Note:
Under the Unification Identity between Gravitation and Electromagnetism in their gauged and dimensionless finestructures in QR, namely G=4pe₀ and so the Stoney-Length reduces to e/c²=√Alpha.L_Planck and so harmonizes the Planck Units with the Stoney Units.

where is the reduced Planck's constant and c is the speed of light. It should be noted however that these are only mathematical constructs since there must be some practical limit to how small a length can get. If the Stoney length is the minimum length then either a body's electromagnetic radius or its half gravitational radius is a physical impossibility, since one of these must be smaller than the Stoney length. If Planck length is the minimum then either a body's reduced Compton wavelength or its half gravitational radius is a physical impossibility since one of these must be smaller than the Planck length. Moreover, the Stoney length and Planck length cannot both be the minimum length.

According to contemporary convention, Planck scale is the scale of vacuum energy, below which space and time do not retain any physical significance. This prescription mandates a general neglect of the Stoney scale within the scientific community today. Previous to this mandate, Hermann Weyl made a notable attempt to construct a unified theory by associating a gravitational unit of charge with the Stoney length. Weyl's theory led to significant mathematical innovations but his theory is generally thought to lack physical significance.

Other

The woman Stoney married was one of his cousins. They had two sons and three daughters. For most of his decades in Dublin, Stoney resided in the Dundrum, Dublin neighbourhood. The street that he lived on was later re-named Stoney Road in his memory. After Stoney died in London, his cremated ashes were buried in Dundrum, Dublin.

One of Stoney's sons, George Gerald Stoney, was a scientist. But a more scientifically notable relative was Stoney's nephew, the Dublin-based physicist George FitzGerald (1851–1901). Stoney and FitzGerald were in regular communication on scientific matters. In addition, on political matters, both Stoney and FitzGearld were active opponents of the Irish Home Rule Movement. In their political opinion, the spirit of Irish Home Rule and later Irish nationalism was contrary to the spirit of science. Stoney resigned from his job as Secretary of Queen's University of Ireland in 1882 in objection to a government decision to introduce "sectarianism" into the system; i.e., Stoney wanted to keep the system non-denominational, but the government acceded to Irish Catholic demands for Catholic institutions.

Craters on Mars and the Moon are named in his honour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Johnstone_Stoney

X=½(√5-1)=0.618033..... and Y=-(X+1)=-½(√5+1)=-1.618033...

-X(X-1)=0.236067... in analogue to X(X+1)=1=T(n) and XY=X+Y=-1=i² as the complex origin.

But 0.236067..=X³, so defining the 'New Unity' as #³=Alpha and the precursive unity as the Cuberoot of Alpha or as # in the symmetry #:#³ = SNI:EMI = Strong Nuclear Interaction Strength { ElectroMagnetic Interaction Strength.

The Strong-Interaction-Constant SIC=√Alpha=√e²/2e_ohc=√(60pe²/h) in standard and in string units, reduces the SNI finestructure constant # by a factor Alpha^1/6. that is in the sixth root of alpha and so relates the SIC at the post quantisation level as # to the prequantum epoch as SIC=√Alpha=#^3/2.

The SNI is therefore so 11.7 times weaker at the XL-Boson 'Grand-Unification-Time' SEW.G of heterotic superstring class HO(32), than at the E_psE_ss timeinstantenuity S.EW.G of the superstring of the Quantum Big Bang in heterotic class HE(8x8) {this is the stringclass of Visi in the group theories}.
This then is the Bosonic Gauge Coupling between superstrings HO(32) and HE(8x8).

The coupling between superstrings IIA (ECosmic and manifesting the cosmic rays as superstring decay products) and IIB (Magnetic Monopole) derives directly from the B(n), with B(n=0)=J_o=2e/hA = 0,9927298 1/J* or 6.2705x10⁹ GeV* and representative of the ECosmic stringclass and the superhigh energy resonances in the cosmic ray spectrum, bounded in the monopolic resonance limit of 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV*.

1-J_o=0.00727021 approximates r_g/r₁₀c²=4/550=0.007272... approximates Alpha at n=n_ps.

The Unity of the SNI transforms to [1-X]=X² and the EMI transforms as the Interaction of Invariance from X to X.
The Weak Nuclear Interaction or WNI as X² becomes [1+X]=1/X and the Gravitational Interaction or GI transforms as X³ transforms to [2+X]=1/X² by MODULAR SYMMETRY between X and Alpha and the encompassing Unification Unity: [1-X][X][1+X][2+X] = 1.

This Unification Polynomial U(u)=u⁴+2u³-u²-2u+1 = 0 then has minimum roots (as quartic solutions) at the Phi=X and the Golden Mean Y=-(1+X).

This sets the coupling between SNI and EMI as X; the coupling between EMI and WNI becomes X² and the coupling between WNI and GI then is again X.
The general Force-Interaction-Ratio so is: SNI:EMI:WNI:GI = #:#³:#¹⁸:#⁵⁴.

This is the generalisation for the cubic transform: x→x³ with the Alpha-Unity squaring in the functionality of the WNI and defining G-Alpha as Alpha¹⁸ in the Planck-Mass trasforming in string bosonic reduction to a basic fundamental nucleonic mass (proton and neutrons as up-down quark conglomerates and sufficient to construct a physical universe of measurement and observation):

m_c=m_planck Alpha⁹ from the electromagnetic string unification with gravitation in the two dimensionless finestructures:

For Gravitational Mass Charge from higher D Magnetic Charge: 1=2pG.m_planck²/hc

For Electromagnetic Coulomb Charge as lower D Electric Charge: Alpha=2pke²/hc

Alpha as the universal masterconstant of creation, then becomes defined via the Riemann Analysis from XY=i² definition, reflecting in modulation in the statistical renormalisation of the B(n) as the probability distributions in quantum wave mechanics however.U(u) has its maximum at u=-½=FRB for U(-½)=25/16=(5/4)² for the B(n) supersymmetry.

The derivation of the HBRMI draws upon this definition process and sets the coupling angle as arcsin(X/@) for a Unitary 'Force' @=(#f_G).cf_psE-Alpha/Alpha and with the electron mass replacing the fundamental nucleonmass m_c in the definition of E-Alpha.

A little bit 'heavy going' Brook, I realise the complexities and the jargon used is unfamiliar to most readers, not accustomed with some major scientific labelings and nomenclature. And there is NO NEED for you or anyone perusing this data, to understand its details. But I put this here, so you can see a way in which the 'Sacred Geometry' is intrinsic to the workings of the universe.

The 'sacred geometry' so is indeed not some aesthetic invention of the Greeks or some metaphysical ancestors, but can be called the 'tools and patterns' used by Mother Nature herself. This I have attempted to illustrate here with some foundations of the 'Dragon Omni-Science' also known as 'Quantum Relativity' and so building upon the postulates and premises of both Special Relativity of the microworlds and the General Relativity of the macrocosmos, building upon Newton's classical mechanics and Maxwell's classical electromagnetism, building upon the natural philosophers of antiquity and so on and on to the Logos and the Sophia of all the Worlds.

And btw, you will not find this information in any mainstream or alternative media.
It is, as I have claimed from the beginning on the old PA forum, which I joined on December 25th, 2009; unique as a Thuban data stream.
I have published a number of papers, such as this one on the nature of Physical Consciousness http://jcer.com/index.php/jcj/article/viewFile/128/137 and also here on this forum at http://www.themistsofavalon.net/t2692-physical-consciousness-in-a-selfconscious-quantum-universe, but this information is for a New World in Coccon and not for the Old World, which still dominates the present paradigms of the existence of the collective human groupmind.
The first page of this link defines the basic formulations - in the Fibonacci Series X+Y=XY=-1.

Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac

<BLOCKQUOTE>
The following interview with Paul Dirac was conducted by David Peat (DP) and Paul Buckley (PB) in the early 1970's for broadcast as part of a CBC radio documentary series entitled Physics and Beyond. The interview was later published in Glimpsing Reality: Ideas in Physics and the Link to Biology, a collection of interviews with leading scientists of the Twentieth Century. The book is available for purchase through
</BLOCKQUOTE>



In one of C.P. Snow's early novels a character in the scientific life of Cambridge is described as the successor of Newton. It can only be Paul Dirac (1902-). Like Newton before him Dirac has made contributions that are respected by his colleagues not only for their depth of insight and clarity but for the power and economy with which mathematics is brought to bear upon the problems of nature. Dirac`s scientific papers have the polished and balanced appearance of a sculpture by Brancusi.

While Heisenberg was discovering the principles of quantum mechanics in his Helgoland retreat, Erwin Schrödinger followed a different path to derive his wave mechanics of the atom. Dirac was able to show that the two theories were equivalent, and in the process provided quantum theory with a sound mathematical footing. His contributions in physics also include the quantum theory of matter and radiation, the prediction of the spin of the electron, and the existence of the positron as well as an attempt to form a marriage between quantum theory and the theory of relativity. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1933.


Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac


Professor Dirac has retired from his position as Lucasian Professor of Physics, the chair previously held by Isaac Newton, and is at present at the Institute of Advanced Studies at Miami, where he was interviewed. At first Professor Dirac seemed reticent about his achievements in physics. However, when the topic of beauty in physical theories was raised, Dirac began to speak with animation. In addition to commenting on the current status of theories of physics he touches on the 'large number hypothesis, which has occupied him in recent years. Dirac is concerned with the occurrence of large numerical constants in physical theories. Rather than ignore these numbers or ascribe the similarity of their values to mere coincidence Dirac has proposed that constants of nature are interrelated. The large value of certain of these constants, Dirac supposes, is connected with the age of the universe.

DP Do you feel that there is the same excitement today in physics that there was in the twenties and thirties?

The problems are more difficult now and there is not the same hope of making rapid progress which there was in those days. Excitement is usually combined with the hope of making rapid progress, when any second rate student can do really first-rate work. But the easier fundamental problems have by now all been worked out. Those that are left are very difficult to work on, and one doesn't seem able to get the right basic ideas for handling them.

It is quite possible that they will require wholly new ideas. In fact it's pretty certain they will; otherwise they would already have been thought up.

PB But they will still be related to the existing development of theory in some sense at least.

Yes. The present theory must be an approximation to any improved theory which we get in the future.

DP Some people we've spoken to seem to think it's a matter for new experiments, particularly in elementary particle physics.

If the theorists are not good enough to solve it on their own, that's what one has to do. It needs an Einstein, or someone like that. Einstein didn't depend on new experiments to get his ideas.

DP Do you feel that the progress in particle physics is fruitful?

It's not really fundamental; it's collecting a mass of information and one doesn't know really how to get the basic ideas from it. Just like in the early 1920s one had a mass of spectroscopic information and it needed Heisenberg to find the real basis of a new theory from that wealth of material.

DP Do you think a unification necessarily will have to include relativity ?

I should think so, ultimately. Perhaps not gravitation in the first place; gravitation is rather separate from ordinary atomic physics and it plays very little role.

DP It seems to be an insurmountable problem to most people: the quantization of relativity. It is something you have worked on.

One can deal with it up to a certain point, but one cannot complete the theory in a satisfactory way.

DP Could you summarize your thinking on the large numbers hypothesis?

The large numbers hypothesis concerns certain dimensionless numbers. An example of a dimensionless number provided by nature is the ratio of the mass of the proton to the mass of the electron. There is another dimensionless number which connects Planck's constant and the electronic charge. This number is about 137, quite independent of the units. When a dimensionless number like that turns up, a physicist thinks there must be some reason for it. Why should it be, well, 137, and not 256 or something quite different. At present one cannot set up a satisfactory reason for it, but still people believe that with future developments a reason will be found.

Now, there is another dimensionless number which is of importance. If you have an electron and a proton, the electric force between them is inversely proportional to the square of the distance; the gravitational force is also inversely proportional to the square of the distance; the ratio of those two forces does not depend on the distance. The ratio gives you a dimensionless number. That number is extremely large, about ten to the power thirty-nine. Of course it doesn't depend on what units you're using. It's a number provided by nature and we should expect that a theory will some day provide a reason for it.

How could you possibly expect to get an explanation for such a large number? Well, you might connect it with another large number - the age of the universe. The universe has an age, because one observes that the spiral nebulae, the most distant objects in the sky, are all receding from us with a velocity proportional to their distance, and that means that at a certain time in the past, they were all extremely close to one another. The universe started quite small or perhaps even as a mathematical point, and there was a big explosion, and these objects were shot out. The ones that were shot out fastest are the ones that have gone the farthest from us. That explains the relationship (Hubble's relationship) that the velocity of recession is proportional to the distance, and from the connection between the velocity of recession and the distance we get the age when the universe started off.

It's called the big bang hypothesis. There is a definite age when the big bang occurred. The most recent observations give it to be about eighteen billion years ago.

Now, you might use some atomic unit of time instead of years, years is quite artificial, depending on our solar system. Take an atomic unit of time, express the age of the universe in this atomic unit, and you again get a number of about ten to the thirty-nine, roughly the same as the previous number.

Now, you might say, this is a remarkable coincidence. But it is rather hard to believe that. One feels that there must be some connection between these very large numbers, a connection which we cannot explain at present but which we shall be able to explain in the future when we have a better knowledge both of atomic theory and of cosmology.

Let us assume that these two numbers are connected. Now one of these numbers is not a constant. The age of the universe, of course, gets bigger and bigger as the universe gets older. So the other one must be increasing also in the same proportion. That means that the electric force compared with the gravitational force is not a constant, but is increasing proportionally to the age of the universe.

The most convenient way of describing this is to use atomic units, which make the electric force constant; then, referred to these atomic units, the gravitational force will be decreasing. The gravitational constant, usually denoted by G, when expressed in atomic units, is thus not a constant any more, but is decreasing inversely proportional to the age of the universe.

One would like to check this result by observation, but the effect is very small. However, one can hope that with observations that will be made within the next few years, it will be possible to check whether G is really varying or not. If it is varying, then we have the problem of fitting this varying G with our previous ideas of relativity. The ordinary Einstein theory demands that G shall be a constant. We thus have to modify it in some way. We don't want to abandon it altogether because it is so successful.

I have proposed a way of modifying it which refers to two standards of length, one standard of length which is used in the Einstein equations, and another which is determined by observations with atomic apparatus. I should say that the idea of two standards of length and of G varying with time is not original. This sort of idea was first proposed by E.A. Milne about forty years ago. But he used different arguments from mine. His equations are in some respects similar to mine; in other respects there are differences. So this theory of mine is essentially a different theory from Milne's, although based on some ideas which were first introduced by Milne. One should give Milne the credit for having the insight of thinking that perhaps the gravitational constant is not really constant at all. Nobody else had questioned that previously.

DP This theory has an important consequence for the creation of matter.

Yes, the amount of particles - elementary particles, protons, and neutrons - in the universe is about ten to the seventy-eight, the square of the age of the universe. It seems again one should say that this is not a coincidence. There is some reason behind it, and therefore the number of particles in the universe will be increasing proportionally to the square of the age of the universe. Thus new matter must be continually created.

There was previously a theory of continuous creation of matter called the steady state cosmology, but this theory of mine is different because the steady state cosmology demands that G shall be a constant. Everything then has to be steady, and in particular G has to keep a steady value. Now, I want to have G varying, and I also want to have continuous creation. It's possible to combine those two ideas and I've worked out some equations on possible models of the universe incorporating them.

PB One of the consequences of your theory is that it rules out an expanding-contracting universe.

That is so, yes, because in the theory there will be a maximum size. This maximum size, expressed in atomic units, would give a large number which does not vary with the time. Now, I want all large numbers to be connected with the age of the universe so that they will all increase as the universe gets older. If you have a theory giving you a large number, of the order of ten to the thirty-nine, which is constant, you must rule out that theory.

PB This implies a constantly expanding universe.

Yes. It must go on expanding forever. It can't just turn around and contract, like many people believe.

PB So that avoids the singularity at the end, so to speak.

Yes, that is avoided; there is just a singularity at the beginning.

PB There seems to be, or at least it 's possible that one may observe such a thing as, a black hole, which is a theoretical consequence of general relativity. That is also a singularity, is it not?

It depends on what mathematical variables you use. It would be a very local singularity anyway, not a cosmological one.

PB But it seems staggering to the imagination that the mass of the star is concentrating into a smaller and smaller volume. I know there are repulsive forces that can stop it at various stages, but finally, I understand, with a star that is perhaps five or ten times the mass of our sun, it need not stop.

That is what it seems, according to current theories.

PB It is difficult to imagine such an object, but I suppose that is not a necessary condition for doing physics.

If you can find equations for it, that's all the physicist really wants. It is quite likely that the laws will get modified under these extreme conditions; we'll have to try to find out what the correct laws are.

PB But they need not contradict physical theory, wouldn't they simply be modifications ?

They would be modifications, modifications holding under extreme conditions.

DP Would you comment on the divergences and infinities which occur in quantum field theory? Many think that they can be removed by renormalization. Is this your feeling?

It's just a stop-gap procedure. There must be some fundamental change in our ideas, probably a change just as fundamental as the passage from Bohr's orbit theory to quantum mechanics. When you get a number turning out to be infinite which ought to be finite, you should admit that there is something wrong with your equations, and not hope that you can get a good theory just by doctoring up that number.

DP Some people have suggested that by introducing curved space you can get rid of these infinities, Abdus Salam for example.

I know that he is working on that idea, but I feel that with a good theory these infinities would never arise in the first place.

DP The papers you produced have been universally considered beautiful. Were you guided by notions of beauty?

Very much so. One can't just make random guesses. It's a question of finding things that fit together very well. You're solving a problem, it might be a crossword puzzle, and things don't fit, and you conclude you've made some mistakes. Suddenly you think of corrections and everything fits. You feel great satisfaction. T he beauty of the equations provided by nature is much stronger than that. It gives one a strong emotional reaction.

DP Do you get this reaction from certain branches of modern physics today?

Not the renormalization theory, no!

PB I have a question about the interpretation of equations. There are certain equations and certain theories where interpretations have been open to a great deal of discussion. It is not quite clear what's really meant in non-mathematical terms; I'm thinking of the principle of complementarity.

Yes, there is an uncertainty in the interpretation. But I don't feel it is too profitable to discuss the uncertainty because the basic equations themselves are uncertain, as I was trying to explain to you previously. If you don't have very great confidence in the basic equations, then there's not really much point in spending a lot of time on the interpretation of the equations, as you believe they will be superseded after a while in any case.

PB I was thinking of the uncertainty relations themselves. Do you believe that these will be superseded?

It's possible. You'd probably have to pay a price for it and give up some other cherished idea.

PB The problem of observation and measurement seems to be important.

Yes, but you're discussing these problems on the basis of our present theories, which are just, I believe, a transient phase of physics and will be superseded after maybe a few decades - or, well, one just doesn't know when they will be superseded. It is rather as though one tried to build up a new philosophy on Bohr's orbit theory. You might have gone a long way with it, but all that argument would have been completely valueless when Bohr's orbit theory was superseded.

DP If you were giving advice to young physicists today, which area would you suggest they look into?

I think perhaps they ought to avoid fundamental physics because all the worthwhile problems there have already been very thoroughly explored.

DP I mean in the sense of which area you think the breakthrough will come in?

I don't know.

DP You'd be there if you knew, I guess.

Yes.

PB Will it also depend on developments in mathematical theory?

That's possible.

PB In the 1920s the mathematics had to be partially invented as well, along with the experiments.

The basic mathematical ideas were known previously to the mathematicians. They knew about Hilbert space; they knew about spinors. They had never thought that these things would ever have any physical application.

PB So it's quite possible that some branches of mathematics already known contain useful approaches.

Yes. However, an enormous volume of mathematics exists, and to look for which part is going to be useful in the future is pretty hopeless.

http://www.fdavidpeat.com/interviews/dirac.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis


Dirac large numbers hypothesis


Paul Dirac


The Dirac large numbers hypothesis (LNH) is an observation made by Paul Dirac in 1937 relating ratios of size scales in the Universe to that of force scales. The ratios constitute very large, dimensionless numbers: some 40 orders of magnitude in the present cosmological epoch. According to Dirac's hypothesis, the apparent equivalence of these ratios might not be a mere coincidence but instead could imply a cosmology with these unusual features:

• The strength of gravity, as represented by the gravitational constant, is inversely proportional to the age of the universe: ;
  
• The mass of the universe is proportional to the square of the universe's age: .
  

Neither of these two features has gained acceptance in mainstream physics and, though some proponents of non-standard cosmologies refer to Dirac's cosmology as a foundational basis for their own ideas and studies, some physicists harshly dismiss the large numbers in LNH as mere coincidences more suited to numerology than physics. A coincidence, however, may be defined optimally as 'an event that provides support for an alternative to a currently favoured causal theory, but not necessarily enough support to accept that alternative in light of its low prior probability.'^[1] Research into LNH, or the large number of coincidences that underpin it, appears to have gained new impetus from failures in standard cosmology to account for anomalies such as the recent discovery that the universe might be expanding at an accelerated rate.^[2]

Background


LNH was Dirac's personal response to a set of large number 'coincidences' that had intrigued other theorists at about the same time. The 'coincidences' began with Hermann Weyl (1919),^[2][3][4] who speculated that the observed radius of the universe might also be the hypothetical radius of a particle whose energy is equal to the gravitational self-energy of the electron:






where r_e is the classical electron radius, m_e is the mass of the electron, m_H denotes the mass of the hypothetical particle, r_H is its electrostatic radius and R_U is the radius of the observable universe.

The coincidence was further developed by Arthur Eddington (1931) ^[5] who related the above ratios to N, the estimated number of charged particles in the Universe:



In addition to the examples of Weyl and Eddington, Dirac was influenced also by the primeval-atom hypothesis of Georges Lemaitre, who lectured on the topic in Cambridge in 1933.^[2] The notion of a varying-G cosmology first appears in the work of Edward Arthur Milne a few years before Dirac formulated LNH. Milne was inspired not by large number coincidences but by a dislike of Einstein's general theory of relativity.^[6][7] For Milne, space was not a structured object but simply a system of reference in which Einstein's conclusions could be accommodated by relations such as this:



where M_U is the mass of the universe and t is the age of the universe in seconds. According to this relation, G increases over time.

Dirac's interpretation of the large number coincidences


The Weyl and Eddington ratios above can be rephrased in a variety of ways, as for instance in the context of time:



where t is the age of the universe, c is the speed of light and r_e is the classical electron radius. Hence, in atomic units where c=1 and r_e = 1, the age of the Universe is about 10⁴⁰ atomic units of time. This is the same order of magnitude as the ratio of the electrical to the gravitational forces between a proton and an electron:



Hence, interpreting the charge e of the electron, the mass m_p/m_e of the proton/electron, and the permittivity factor 4πε₀ in atomic units (equal to 1), the value of the gravitational constant is approximately 10⁻⁴⁰. Dirac interpreted this to mean that G varies with time as , and thereby pointed to a cosmology that seems 'designer-made' for a theory of quantum gravity. According to general relativity, however, G is constant, otherwise the law of conserved energy is violated. Dirac met this difficulty by introducing into the Einstein equations a gauge function β that describes the structure of spacetime in terms of a ratio of gravitational and electromagnetic units. He also provided alternative scenarios for the continuous creation of matter, one of the other significant issues in LNH:^[2]

• 'additive' creation (new matter is created uniformly throughout space) and
  
• 'multiplicative' creation (new matter is created where there are already concentrations of mass).
  

Later developments and interpretations


Dirac's theory has inspired and continues to inspire a significant body of scientific literature in a variety of disciplines. In the context of geophysics, for instance, Edward Teller seemed to raise a serious objection to LNH in 1948 ^[8] when he argued that variations in the strength of gravity are not consistent with paleontological data. However, George Gamow demonstrated in 1962 ^[9] how a simple revision of the parameters (in this case, the age of the solar system) can invalidate Teller's conclusions. The debate is further complicated by the choice of LNH cosmologies: In 1978, G. Blake ^[10] argued that paleontological data is consistent with the 'multiplicative' scenario but not the 'additive' scenario. Arguments both for and against LNH are also made from astrophysical considerations. For example, D. Falik^[11] argued that LNH is inconsistent with experimental results for microwave background radiation whereas Canuto and Hsieh^[12][13] argued that it is consistent. One argument that has created significant controversy was put forward by Robert Dicke in 1961. Known as the anthropic coincidence or fine-tuned universe, it simply states that the large numbers in LNH are a necessary coincidence for intelligent beings since they parametrize fusion of hydrogen in stars and hence carbon-based life would not arise otherwise.

Various authors have introduced new sets of numbers into the original 'coincidence' considered by Dirac and his contemporaries, thus broadening or even departing from Dirac's own conclusions. Jordan (1947) ^[14] noted that the mass ratio for a typical star and an electron approximates to 10⁶⁰, an interesting variation on the 10⁴⁰ and 10⁸⁰ that are typically associated with Dirac and Eddington respectively. Various numbers of the order of 10⁶⁰ were arrived at by V. E. Shemi-Zadah (2002) ^[15] through measuring cosmological entities in Planck units. P. Zizzi (1998) argued that there might be a modern mathematical interpretation of LNH in a Planck-scale setting in the context of quantum foam.^[16] The relevance of the Planck scale to LNH was further demonstrated by S. Caneiro and G. Marugan (2002)^[17] by reference to the holographic principle. Previously, Carneiro (1997)^[18] arrived at an intermediate scaling factor 10²⁰ when considering the possible quantization of cosmic structures and a rescaling of Planck's constant.

Several authors have recently identified and pondered the significance of yet another large number, approximately 120 orders of magnitude. This is for example the ratio of the theoretical and observational estimates of the energy density of the vacuum, which Nottale (1993)^[19] and Matthews (1997)^[20] associated in an LNH context with a scaling law for the cosmological constant. Carl Friedrich von Weizsaecker identified 10¹²⁰ with the ratio of the universe's volume to the volume of a typical nucleon bounded by its Compton wavelength, and he identified this ratio with the sum of elementary events or bits of information in the universe.^[21] T. Goernitz (1986), building on Weizsaecker's work, posited an explanation for large number 'coincidences' in the context of Bekenstein–Hawking entropy.^[22] Genreith (1999)^[23] has sketched out a fractal cosmology in which the smallest mass, which he identified as a neutrino, is about 120 orders of magnitude smaller than the mass of the universe (note: this 'neutrino' approximates in scale to the hypothetical particle m_H mentioned above in the context of Weyl's work in 1919). Sidharth (2005)^[24] interpreted a typical electromagnetic particle such as the pion as a collection of 10⁴⁰ Planck oscillators and the universe as a collection of 10¹²⁰ Planck oscillators. The fact that a number like 10¹²⁰ can be represented in a variety of ways has been interpreted by Funkhouser (2006)^[25] as a new large numbers coincidence. Funkhouser claimed to have 'resolved' the LNH coincidences without departing from the standard model for cosmology. In a similar vein, Carneiro and Marugan (2002) claimed that the scaling relations in LNH can be explained entirely according to basic principles.^[17]

Great interview shiloh. Thank you for sharing.

Vedic literature says there was NO BIG explosion. Big Bang hypothesis should be not used as starting point to grab our masonic tools and run to measure time and matter. Emerging consciousness? Was there no consciousness at some point, hmmm? Darwinism seed made our consciousness dirty seems forever.
I noticed this big bang cheat starts in most videos. :) and definitely we should not put God in a box and start from there. Time does not exist and it is illusion that forces us to think about time and measure it. Time is not increasing and not contracting, also there is no 4D, 5D, or other speculation about Ds.
Universe expanding constantly? Kali Yuga is decay of matter and our consciousness.
If it seems that it is expanding, maybe decaying expansion? hmmm...

with respect
devakas

devakas wrote:Great interview shiloh. Thank you for sharing.

Vedic literature says there was NO BIG explosion. Big Bang hypothesis should be not used as starting point to grab our masonic tools and run to measure time and matter. Emerging consciousness? Was there no consciousness at some point, hmmm? Darwinism seed made our consciousness dirty seems forever.
I noticed this big bang cheat starts in most videos. :) and definitely we should not put God in a box and start from there. Time does not exist and it is illusion that forces us to think about time and measure it. Time is not increasing and not contracting, also there is no 4D, 5D, or other speculation about Ds.
Universe expanding constantly? Kali Yuga is decay of matter and our consciousness.
If it seems that it is expanding, maybe decaying expansion? hmmm...

with respect
devakas

There are as many 'wanna be cosmologies' as there are philosophers in the history of the present humen genus devakas.
The internet is ripe with Einstein- and Big Bang bashers, nevertheless the overwhelming scientific evidence as to the validity of the physical and metaphysical parameters verifying it.
There are very valid arguments in vedic philosophy, such as comparing the cyclic and oscillating universe to the 'Breath of Brahman' and the Yugas and so on. The hypotheses of science do the same in proposing ekpyrotic brane collisions and the 'cosmic egg' of Le Maitre.
However, contrary to the 'belief' of many, the Big Bang and 'Steady State' aka the 'finite beginning in time' and the 'cyclic eternity of time' are not mutually exclusive. Some of those issues are and have been addressed in my messages.

But regarding your overall devakas cosmology, I would say, that from a more informed perspective of the dragons - no more commentary is necessitated.

As I have no interest to 'overwhelm' Brook's thread here with scientific calculations and principles, this message detailing Dirac's proposal for a diminishing gravitational constant with time and proportionally scale-relating the microcosm to the macrocosm in say the Age of the Universe; this addendum shall be my last contribution on this thread.

The later part of this message relates to the 'changing magnetic field' of not just the earth, but to all celestially rotating bodies in a fundamental relationship between any such mass and its rotation rate then creating a multidimensional magnetic field around the rotating body.



NEWTON'S GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT MEASUREMENTS



The speed of light 'c' has been measured to an accuracy of 8 decimal places and Planck's Constant 'h' is known with an error not exceeding one part per million.
This is not so for Newton's Gravitational Constant 'Big G'.

The National Bureau of Standards (NBS) in Gaithersburg, Maryland, US began measuring 'G' in the 1930's to establish the Luther-Towler-Number LTN=6.67259x10^-11 G-units (m³/kg.s²).

So it stood until 1994, when the renowned PTB in Braunschweig, Germany's Standards Laboratory measured G much higher, differing in the 3rd decimal place.

Then New Zealand's Measurements Standard Laboratory published avalue significantly below the LTN and the University of Wuppertal derived a value in between the NZ one and the LTN.

Notwithstanding the ever improving technological advances and measuring techniques; using torsion pendulums, tungsten cylinders or suspended or accelerating testmasses; 'Big G' has proven to be intractable to conformity.
Two of the latest measurements are 6.67327x10^-11 and 6.6742(10)x10^-11 G-units and values by no means definitive.

What is going on?

Shifting heavy objects in the vicinity of the test apparatus seems to influence the atomic structure of the testmasses, irrespective of the isolated environment created for the testing conditions.



The following treatise shall resolve the conundrum and illustrate the unruly behaviour of 'G' as a consequence of the initial boundary conditions for the universe's subsequent evolvement.

It shall indicate that even a 'massless' universe would contain a diminished G-component as the electric permittivity of a massless macroquantised (Hawking) BlackHole and that the present dilemma derives from a finestructure of the nucleonic constituents, which, by definition, must comprise the testmasses.

A precise measurement so would rely on an unambiguous calculation for two neutronic restmasses, a condition which we shall show to be unachievable, because of the nature and interrelationship between the parameters of inertial mass and those of electromagnetic charges.

There are actually TWO G-Constants, one constant as say G_o in the quantum gravity models defining the Planck-Scale and another one used for agglomerated masses, say two masses M_1,2 being comprised of say N_1,2 neutrons (or nucleons).

We shall find a maximised neutron mass m_nmax (or nucleon mass via the beta-minus decay of the weak nuclear interaction giving the quark-lepton content of the Standard Model in say protons, electrons and antineutrinos) and a minimum neutron mass m_c, and the latter being a direct consequence of the Planck-Mass m_P=√(hc/2πG_o) from the gravitational finestructure G-alpha=2πG_oM²/hc. So setting G-alpha to unity gives the Planck-Mass.

But setting M=m_c gives the G-alpha as the force-interaction ratio between the electromagnetic alpha, defined as: alpha=2πke²/hc with k=1/4πε_o.

One can so immediately calculate the minimum neutron mass as the expression:

m_c=√{G-alpha.hc/2πG_o}.


Now the ratio between the electromagnetic- and the gravitational interaction strengths is measured and of the order of alpha/G-alpha~10^-39 and one can actually define the G-alpha as a function of alpha and as G-alpha=alpha¹⁸, using the string parameters of Quantum Relativity.

This defines the minimum neutronmass m_c explicitely as: m_c=√{ke².alpha¹⁷/G_o}.

In string parameters, the unification condition for the interactions at the stringenergy scale demands kG_o=1 for a m_c=[e/G_o].alpha^8.5=9.9247246..x10^-28 kg*. This represents so 58% of the neutron (or nucleon) mass as measured today and is the actual minimum neutron mass.

Now the truly CONSTANT GM² structure in say Newton's Law, is given by the product G_om_c²=1.094446..x10^-64 Nm².

This however is finestructured in introducing a maximum neutron mass given in a unification condition, known as the Euler Identity: X+Y=XY=-1=i²=℮^iπ and applying the absolute value of unitised 1.

We write: G_om_c²={G_oX^n+k}.{m_cYⁿ}.{m_cY^k}=G_m.m_nmax.m_nmin and where G_m is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories. So the applied G value is: G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k and where n is a cycletime n=H_ot for a nodal universe with dn/dt=H_o the nodal Hubble Constant H_o=c/R_max for a Hubble radius R_max.
The applied G_m so ALWAYS engages a maximised neutron mass (calculated as {m_cYⁿ}~ 1.7115x10^-27 kg in string parameters for a present cycletime coordinate n_p=1.1324..) AND a minimised neutron mass (calculated as {m_cY^k}). The value of k is so determinative for G_m and differs over the evolution of the universe with respect to cycletime n and as finestructured for an AVERAGE G-value (G_av) obtained in using the geometric mean for the neutron masses in extremum (minmax productation).

One can easily calculate G_av=G_o.Xⁿ=6.44317..x10^-11 G-units for a geometric neutron mass product of m_nmax.m_nmin=m_c².Yⁿ =1.69861...x10^-54 kg² for the constancy condition of G_om_c²=1.094446..x10^-64 Nm² and omitting the k-factorisation. But this averaged G value applies for a massless universe under the initial unification condition of the finestructures described in G_ok=1 or G_o=4πε_o (using Stoney Units for the Planck-Scaling of the chargequantum e).

So BECAUSE an initial mass seedling M_o={m_c.m_P/m_e}√E ~ 1.8137..x10⁵¹ kg* became transformed in the de Broglie phase inflation from its preinertial state as gravitational mass into the state of inertia (this is called the Big Bang for a spacetime quanta counter E); this 'Principle of Equivalence' introduced the hitherto massless 'ylemic' 'neutron bosons' as dineutronic states, which under the Higgs mechanism became fermionic and established the mass seedling M_o as the primordial neutron matter, then decaying via beta minus decay into the observed matter in the universe (there was no antimatter).



Subsequently the EMERGENCE of inertial mass under c-invariance also introduced a finestructure for 'G' as described in the above. One can determine the value of k from finestructuring the critical masses M_o, M_∞ and M_Hawking as boundary Black Hole masses coupled to the quantum minmax neutron masses.

For curvature radius R_max and the critical density ρ_c=M_∞/V_max=3H_o²/8πG_o the Schwarzschild metric gives M_∞=R_max.c²/2G_o=c³/2G_oH_o= ~ 6.47058..x10⁵² kg*.


For the curvature radius R_Sarkar=2G_oM_o/c², we have the deceleration parameter q_o=½Ω_o=M_o/2M_∞=2G_oH_oM_o/c³ ~0.014015... and which so determines the 'missing mass' in the universe to be a consequence of the initial boundary conditions set by the de Broglie inflation and the overall Black Hole evolution of the stringed parameters.

The Mass-Temperature modulus of Stephen Hawking determines M_Hawking=Constant/T_Hawking for a boundary condition of maximised Black Hole Mass for a minimised Black Hole Temperature in M_HawkingT_Hawking=constant for Constant=hc³/4πG_ok and k the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.



The relationship is given in superstring (Planck) parameters by

M_min.T_max={c/2π}².M_max.T_min=hc³/4πG_ok= ½m_P.T_P and T_P the Planck Temperature T_P=m_P.c²/k.

This sets the Hawking-Gibbons thermodynamic temperature minima for T_o=constant/M_o ~ 5.03..x10^-28 K* and T_∞=constant/M_∞ ~ 1.41..x10^-29 K*.

As the minimum macro Black Hole has Schwarzschild metric λ_min/2π=2G_oM_min/c² for T_max=hf_max/k=hc/λ_mink; and modular duality requires the unification condition for the minimum curvature to relate to a maximum curvature in R_min=λ_min/2π=1/R_max or R_max=2πλ_max, as R_min.R_max=1.



In gauge bosonic string parameters, this modular duality then is given in E_max=hc/λ_min=m_max.c²=kT_max and E_min=hc/λ_max=m_min.c²=kT_min and in the invariance of the lightspeed parameter c as c=f_maxλ_min=1/f_minλ_max or the dimensionless unification conditions: E_max.E_min=h² and E_max/E_min=f_max²=1/f_min²={c/λ_min}²={c/2πR_min}²={cR_max/2π}²={cλ_max}².

This gives a proportionality: m_max.T_min=m_min.T_max for the gauges, which is however modified in the dimensionless factor {c/2π}² for the Black Hole masses for the given temperatures, as bosonic masses describe bosonic Black Holes via E=kT and not the cosmological Black Holes of the Schwarzschild metric.

The c-invariance so uses modular duality in the quantum Black Hole limit
c=f_maxλ_min=2πf_maxR_min for f_min=c/λ_max=c/2πR_max as an unmodulated frequency in T_min=E_min/k=hc/2πkR_max=hc.λ_min/4π²k=3.58856...x10^-26 K* and a temperature above the Hawking-Gibbons limit as required.

This differs in a factor {2π/c}² from the lightspeed inversion in T_min=hf_min/k and so 1.574x10^-41 K*, which violates the Hawking-Gibbons boundaries in NOT using the modular duality and with f_min=1/f_max in frequency units and NOT inverted time units.

And so M_min.T_max=hc³/4πG_ok=½m_P.T_P=M_Hawking.hc.λ_min/4π² and the Hawking Mass is determined as M_max=M_Hawking=πc²λ_max/G_o ~ 2.544690...x10⁴⁹ kg*.

We can see, that this modulation closely approximates the geometric mean of the seedling mass in M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking=3.2895..x10¹⁰²/3.2931..x10¹⁰² ~ 0.9989...

This also circumscribes the actual to critical density ratio in the omega of the general relativistic treatment of the cosmologies.

Now recall our applied G value in G_m(n)=G_o.^_Xn+k and apply our just derived Black Hole Mass modulation coupled to that of the quantum micromasses.

We had: G_om_c²={G_oX^n+k}.{m_cYⁿ}.{m_cY^k}=G_m.m_nmax.m_nmin and where G_m is the actual G value as measured and which has proved difficult to do so in the laboratories.

G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_om_c²/m_nmax.m_nmin=G_om_c²/({m_cYⁿ}{m_nmin}) and where we have {m_nmin=m_cY^k} for the unknown value of k.

So G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av} and where now {m_nmin}={m_cY^k}={2M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av/M_o²}=1.0011..m_av.
m_av={M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_nmin}={M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY^k}=0.9989..{m_cY^k} and obviously represents a REDUCED minimum mass m_nmin=m_cY^k.

But the product of maximum and 'new' minimum now allows an actual finetuning to a MEASURED nucleon mass m_N by: m_N² = m_avYⁿ.m_cYⁿ=m_av.m_nmax.Yⁿ.


So substituting for m_av in our G_m expression, will now give the formulation:

G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking.m_av}
G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k=G_oXⁿ[m_c/m_nmin]=G_o{m_c²/m_cYⁿ}.{M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking}{m_cY²ⁿ/m_N²}
G_m(n)=G_o.{m_c²/m_N²}{M_o²/2M_∞.M_Hawking}Yⁿ=G_o.Xⁿ

The average nucleon mass m_N is upper bounded in the neutron mass and lower bounded in the proton mass, their difference being an effect of their nucleonic quark content, differing in the up-down transition and energy level.



For a Neutron Restmass of: m_n=1.680717x10^-27 kg* (941.6036 MeV*) the substitution (and using calibrations m=0.9983318783m*; s=0.9990230094s*; kg=0.99626135kg* and C=0.997296076C* gives G(n_p)=6.678764x10^-11 (m³/kgs²) and a perturbation corrected m_n=1.681100563x10^-27 kg* (941.818626 MeV*) gives:
G(n_p)=6.675715x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).

The perturbation upper limit is given in the m_n=1.681335x10^-27 kg* (941.9506 MeV*) and gives:
G(n_p)=6.6738445x10^-11 (m³/kgs²). The average for the last two values then approximates as a 'best fit' for:

G_m(n_p)=6.6747798x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).
This is a best-fit approximation, considering the uncharged nature of the testmasses.

This then gives the value of k from G_m(n)=G_o.X^n+k as k=ln(G_mYⁿ/G_o)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.073387..
Two protons (m_p=1.6789x10^-27 kg* (940.56 MeV*) would give:

G(n_p)=6.6936x10^-11 (m³/kgs²) and a proton-neutron pair would yield: G(n_p)=6.6791x10^-11 (m³/kgs²); both of the latter values unsuitable because of the electrocharges increasing theintra-quarkian Magnetocharge coupling between the two mesonicrings of the neutron and the single mesonic ring in the proton'sdown- or KIR-quark.

The best approximation for 'Big G' hence depends on an accurate determination for the neutron's inertial mass, only fixed as the base nucleon minimum mass at the birth of the universe. A fluctuating Neutron mass would also result in deviations in 'G' independent upon the sensitivity of the measuring equipment. The inducted mass difference in the protonic-and neutronic restmasses, derives from the Higgs-Restmass-Scale and can be stated in a first approximation as the groundstate.


Basic nucleon restmass is: m_c=√Omega.m_P=9.9247245x10^-28 kg*.

(Here Omega is a gauge string factor coupling in the fundamental force interactions as:

Cuberoot(Alpha):Alpha:Cuberoot(Omega):Omega and for Omega=G-alpha.)

KKK-Kernelmass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.62 MeV*=958.857 MeV*, usingthe Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.

Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as 939.642 MeV*. This includes the electronic perturbation.

For the Proton,one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and for theNeutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential.

Proton m_p=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.6420+1.5013-0.5205)MeV*=940.6228 MeV*. Neutron m_n=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.6420+3.0026-1.0410)MeV*=941.6036 MeV*.

This is the groundstate from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanismand reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for theinertial mass differential between the two elementary nucleons. All groundstate elementary particle masses are computed from theHiggs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures. Overall, the MEASURED gravitational constant 'G' can be said to be decreasing over time.

The ratio given in k is G_mYⁿ/G_o~0.60073... and so the present G-constant is about 60% of the one at the Planck Scale.


For G_m(n)/G_o=X^n+k=u=e^(n+k)lnX by (n+k)lnX=lnu for dG/dt=(dG/dn).(dn/dt) and with n=H_ot with dn/dt=H_o and H_o=c/R_{Hubble=n[sub]present}/t_present

(dG(n)/dt)/G_o=H_o.lnX.e^klnX+nlnX] ~(-9.035849..x10^-19).(0.600724..)=(-5.42805x10^-19) seconds or a decreasing change of G_m(present) of about 1.713x10^-11 G-units per 'civil' year.

Setting k=0 gives the noninertial G-constant for the electric permittive cosmology as a Lower Bound, for which G(n)=G_oXⁿ:

(dG(n)/dt)/G_o=H_o.lnX.e^nlnX] ~(-9.035849..x10^-19).(0.57988..)=(-5.23971x10^-19) seconds or a decreasing change of G_m(present) of about 1.6535x10^-11 G-units per 'civil' year.

An Upper Bound can be approximated by =G(n)/G_o=X^n+k/Age of the Universe,
G(n.t) so decreases nonlinearly, but at a present rate of 0.60073/19.11x10⁹ per year, which calculates as 3.143..x10^-11 G-units per year as a linear upper bound approximation.


Generally using the exponential series expansion, one can indicate the change in G.
For X^n+k=z=exp[(n+k)lnX] by (n+k)lnX=lnz for the value Z=(n+k)lnX=-0.481212(n+k); z transforms in exponential expansion e^x=1+x+x²/2!+x³/3!+x⁴/4!+...

For a function f(n)=z=G_m(n)/G_o=X^n+k
f(n)=1-(0.481.)(n+k)+(0.231.)(n+k)²/2-(0.111.)(n+k)³/6+(0.053.)(n+k)⁴/24-...+...

For 4th order with n=1.1324.. and k=0 (for a purely electromagnetic universe of zero mass content where the curvature derives from the gravitational mass equivalent of the Equivalence Principle of General Relativity):
f(1.1324.)=1-0.545+0.148-0.027+0.004-...+...~0.580

So the gravitational G_m(1.1324)=(0.580)G_o=G_o.X^1.1324~6.444x10^-11 (m³/kgs²).
At timeinstantenuity of the Quantum Big Bang, n=n_ps=λ_ps/R_max=6.2591x10^-49~0
Then G_BigBang=G_oX^n_ps=G_o (to 50 decimal places distinguishing the timeinstanton from the Nulltime as the Planck-Time transform).

For our previously calculated k=ln(G_mYⁿ/G_o)/lnX and which calculates as k= -0.073387..
f(n)=1-(0.481.)(n+k)+(0.231.)(n+k)²/2-(0.111.)(n+k)³/6+(0.053.)(n+k)⁴/24-...+...
for f(1.1324)=1-0.509+0.129-0.0220+0.0028-...+...~0.601 to fourth order approximation.

Hence, the gravitational constant assumes a value of about 61% of its Big Bang initialisation and calculates as 6.675x10^-11 G-units for a present cycletime n_present=H_ot_present=1.1324...

The introduction of the mass seed coupling between the macroquantum M_o and the microquantum m_c=m_Palpha⁹ (from the gravitational finestructure unification) PERTURBS the 'purely electromagnetic' cosmology in the perturbation factor k and increases the purely electromagnetic G_memr in the black hole physics described.


So gravity appears stronger when one 'looks back in time' or analyses cosmological objects at large distances. The expansion parameter (a) in the Friedmann-Einstein standard cosmology can be rewritten as a curvature ratio R(n)/R_max={n/(n+1)} and describes the asymptotic universe in say 10 dimensions evolving under the inertial parameters of the c-invariance. This 'lower dimensional universe' is open and expands under hyperbolic curvature under the deceleration parameter q_o=½Ω_o=M_o/2M_∞=2G_oH_oM_o/c³ ~0.014015... This open universe is bounded in the 'standing wave' of the Hubble Oscillation of the 11D and 'higher dimensional universe'.

The boundary is given in the omega of the 'missing mass' of the volumes, which differ in a factor of V₁₁/V₁₀=n_Rmax³/(n/(n+1))³R_max³=(n+1)³/n²=DIM-Factor (and which assumes its minimum for one complete oscillation for n=2 as DIM=27/4=6.75 so 14.7 Billion years from the present).

Presently, for n=1.132419.. DIM=7.561.. and so the 'missing mass' will be measured as a 'dark matter' distribution of 'dark haloes' etc. around the luminous matter given in the ylemic mass seedling M_o of the baryonic matter.
As M_o is just 2.8% of M_∞, but is subject to a 'growth' in the maximising factor Yⁿ=1.724.. for the present epoch, one can take the factor M_av==M_o.√Yⁿ=1.313.. for a 'dark matter' percentage upper bounded in 2.8%(1.724)~4.83% and lower bounded in 2.8%(1.313)~3.68%.


But so 7.56 open universes are contained within the closed and spherical universe given in the Hubble bound. And the 'dark matter' will be 7.56 times the luminous baryonic matter in the interval {27.82%, 36.51%} as percentage of the total energy of closure for Ω_o=1 and the critical density ρ_c=M_∞/V_max=3H_o²/8πG_o.

Our Big Bang happened at the modular time 1/f_max=t_min=f_min=3.33..x10^-31 seconds*, coinciding with the end of the stringed inflation epoch of the standard cosmology.

The 'de Broglie' inflation established the crucial boundary parameters as say given in the M_o and M_∞ Black Hole masses described.

As the baryonic mass seedling M_o sets the Sarkar Scale for the cosmic architecture in the size of galactic superclusters as the limit for the gravitationally interacting systems before cosmic homogeneity; there must be a Black Hole evolution superposed onto the expansion of the 10D universe and the oscillation of the 11D universe which 'adds' a 'electromagnetic' volume of 2π²R_max³ at the Hubble nodes every 16.9 Billion years.



In terms of the dimensional 'intersection' this can be described as a 'Strominger Brane' evolution with the Sarkar Scale set at the instanton, decreasing as a 'shrinking' Black Hole until it becomes massless at the wormhole scale defined in the minimum macro Black Hole λ_min/2π=2G_oM_min/c²=1.591549..x10^-23 metres*.

This then resets the bosonic micro Black Holes with their macro counterparts under the modular duality.

This Black Hole evolution is higher dimensional and purely electromagnetic, not being observable due to its noninertial nature, except the so called 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' scenarios of the boundary- and initial conditions. This can lead to a feasible model for the phenomenon of consciousness.

The process will take place in a DIM factor of about 234.5 as: M_min.Y^N=M_∞ and for
N=ln(M_∞/M_min)/lnY~234.5 and so in 16.9x234.5 Billion years, which are about 4 Trillion years.

The addition of inertia to a purely electromagnetic monopolic cosmology then varies the value of Newton's gravitational constant G as a function of the micro-macro evolution of the Black Holes and renders the applicable local G-constant as mensuration dependent on the precision measurement for the basic nucleon mass m_cYⁿ for a local epoch-cycle coordinate n=H_ot.
r_psYⁿ=R_H then defines n_recharge =ln[R_H/r_ps]/ln[Y] ~ 234.472 or about 3.9628 Trillion years.



The Cyclic Universe, so 'rebangs' itself every 4 Trillion years or so to ensure its continuation of selfexploration and by interdimensional civilisations defined in multiverses, each of which is required to be seeded in a prototypical template universe as mirror holofractal of itself.
The gravitational constancy of G_om_c²=1.094446..x10^-64 Nm² will then be effected by a very small G_av=G_oXⁿ~1.463x10^-105 G-units, but compensated with a 'mass-evolved' universe with m_cYⁿ~7.535..x10⁶⁷ kg* and where this 'evolution' energy can be physically modelled as 'cosmic consciousness' defined in the 'awareness' df/dt minimised in f_min² and maximised in f_max² and as a form of radial displacement independent angular acceleration acting on spacetime volumars defined in the classical electron diameter (2R_e) times c² defining the magnetocharge e* as inversion of the Big Bang base parameter of the wormhole energy quantum E_max=1/e*=1/2R_ec² for a Planck Constant finestructure h=λ_min/e*c.

This "Strominger brane' evolution avoids the so called 'heat death' of the universe in a form of 'recharging' and coincides with the projected 'running out' of stellar nuclear fuel of the transformation of the elements within stars in the stellar evolution scenarios.

The entire cosmology is underpinned by a Black Hole evolution, which incorporates the quantum geometric microcosmos and the geometric relativistic macrocosmos simultaneously - all for the 'cosmic purpose' to manifest 'evolved mass' as 'consciousness' or 'dark light' or antiradiation.

Tonyblue

Admin
Posts: 1410
Tonyblue - Posted Jan 23rd 2011

---

vALERY - Posted 4 Days Ago

To any interested. without going into a vary long discussion. Our local gravity is constantly being altered. One fifth to approximatly one sixth of the local mass of the earth/moon gravitational system is orbiting around the earth. During the moon orbit the moon pass through differing areas of earths Magnetosphere. These orbits alter both the magentic and gravational moments causing slight shifts in gravity.

It is all in the timing and tracking the moving bloch walls. But first you need the keys to understand the puzzle.

Momentary monopole moments.

I have created/rediscovered an entire theory that can simple explain away gravity as a momentary mono-pole reaction with a twist on ether side. Twist cause plantary orbit and rotation.

Hope to share it all to the world soon.

Ed leedsklnin knew it also.

Valery

---

Indeed Valery!

A Reformulation of the Biot-Savart Law for Magnetic Flux Density shows, that the Magnetic Field of the earth changes either in proportion to its rotation speed about its axis or as a dynamic oscillation of its core.

The Biot-Savart law (Laplace-Ampere) states Magnetic Flux (measured in Tesla=Weber/Area=Volt.time=Energy/Current) to be dB=μ_oi.dL/4πr² from B=μ_oqv/4πr². For a tangential velocity v the angular velocity ω=2πf=vr.

The finestructure unification between the electromagnetic alpha=2πk.e²/hc and the gravitational alpha 2πG_om_c²/hc then modifies this law as B=Mω/2Rc² by the monopolic string mass-current M=30ec for a magnetocharge e*=2e as a Cooper-Charge for the superconductive Cosmic String, manifesting as e=½e*=½(M/30c).

The detailed derivations are appended.


For the Earth then:
The earth's magnetic field approximates as 3x10^-5 Tesla (0.3 gauss) for a core-mantle differential rotation.

M_core=ρ_core.V_core~9x10²² kg and R_core~1.2x10⁶ m and ω=2π/86,400.

Here M becomes the unitised mass of the rotating system of angular velocity ω and a displacement radius R.

So Valery's proposal of a mass distribution of magnetomonopolar moments in the earth's atmosphere can be restated as an increase of the core-mantle differential in the scalefactor R.

Increasing the Mass of the Earth is unnecessary should the scale radius R_core be allowed to oscillate and at the present time resulting in a diminishing overall magnetic gaussian flux due to the size of the core increasing in volume compared to its encompassing magma mantle.


In certain gravitoelectric effects (see http://www.thuban.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&id=16770369-62B0-4E6A-A630-313D5EB1E228&fid=CE783297-5E53-4994-B544-EE129240CFDB ), the rotation rate is said to be so 6500 cycles per minute and so w=2πf~680 radians per second.

The magnetic flux then is a function approximated by B~[3.8x10^-15]M/R).
So B increases for a given radius with the gravitomagnetic mass in a selfinduction.
Generally, a rotating cosmic body of mass M and spinrate ω selfinduces a gravitomagnetic field in analogy to the laws of Maxwell, Faraday and Lenz in a form of B=Mω/2Rc².

For a typically evolved galaxy such as the Milky Way, the masses are of the order of 2x10⁴² kg, inclusive the dark matter as gravitationally acting component. A typical radius is of the order of 50,000 lightyears or so 5x10²⁰ metres and a galactic rotation rate can be approximated in so 250 Million years, being the rotation period of 'our' solar system about the galactic core.

This then gives the INTRINSIC magnetic field for a nonionised charge distribution and for the Milky Way: B=(2x10⁴² kg)(2π/8x10¹⁵ s)/(18x10¹⁶x5x10²⁰ m)~2x10^-11 Tesla or 2x10^-7 gauss or 0.2 microgauss.

This is on the scale of the New Scientist article mentioned in the link above http://www.thuban.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&id=16770369-62B0-4E6A-A630-313D5EB1E228&fid=CE783297-5E53-4994-B544-EE129240CFDB ,

So what are the 'seedling' magnetic fields, proposed in that latter article to have derived from Cosmic Strings at even smaller magnitudes?

It is simple, when we realise that this seedling must be the entire universe itself.
The Hubble-Frequency is so 1.9x10^-18 s and the Hubble-Radius is so 2x10²⁶ metres and the mass-seedling is 2x10⁵¹ kg baryonic and 6.5x10⁵² kg for the asymptotic closure in Euclidean flatness of zero curvature.

This gives a cosmic magnetic field of B=9x10⁼¹⁰ Tesla and B=3x10^-8 Tesla and just the measured galactic typical 'upper bounds' for the universe's mass say.

The universe so displays magnetism on account of its Hubble-parameters, which are magnified string parameters.
And the absolute minimum frequency for the wormhole is 3.33x10^-31 seconds and applying this as a Zero-Point for the cosmogenesis; the 'seedling' magnetic field would become so B=1.4x10^-22 Tesla and B=4.7x10^-21 Tesla for our total mass distributions.

The Cosmic Strings are always associated with Black Holes as Vortex 'seeds' and depict the monopolic mass-current from the upper bounded monopole mass of 2.7x10¹⁶ GeV, which is the string unification scale as first Planck-Nugget transformation.


The Biot-Savart Law: B=μ_oqv/4πr²=μ_oi/4πr=μ_oNef/2r=μ_oNeω/4πr for angular velocity ω=v/r transforms into B=constant(e/c³)gxω
in using a_centripetal=v²/r=rω² for g=GM/r²=(2GM/c²)(c²/2r²)=(R_Sc²/2R²) for a Schwarzschild solution R_S=2GM/c².
B=constant(eω/rc)(v/c)²=μ_oNeω/4πr yields constant=μ_oNc/4π=(120πN/4π)=30N with e=m_M/30c for
30N(eω/c³)(GM/R²)=30N(m_M/30c)ω(2GM/c²)/(2cR²)=NmM(ω/2c²R)(R_S/R)= {M}ω/2c²R.

Subsequently, B=Mw/2c²R = Nm_M(R_S/R){ω/2c²R} to give a manifesting mass M finestructured in
M=Nm_M(R_S/R) for N=2n in the superconductive 'Cooper-Pairings' for a charge count q=Ne=2ne.

But any mass M has a Schwarzschild radius R_S for N=(M/m_M){R/R_S}=(M/m_M){Rc²/2GM}={Rc²/2Gm_M}={R/R_M} for a monopolic Schwarzschild radius R_M=2Gm_M/c²=2G(30ec)/c²=60ec/30c³=2e/c²=2L_P√Alpha=2OL_P.

There are many references by professional cosmologists regarding the constraints on the G-variation

i.e.

Constraining a possible time variation of the gravitational constant with terrestrial nuclear laboratory data
P. G. Krastev, B. A. Li

Department of Physics, Texas A&M University – Commerce, Commerce, TX 75429, U.S.A∗
http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0702080v2

and

A new white dwarf constraint on the rate of change of the gravitational constant
Marek Biesiada, Beata Malec
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0303489v3


Tonyblue

As farewell message to this thread then; I present this 'much easier to read' related 'channelling message' from 'Kryon' and shall continue the previous few posts on the Age of the universe, Dirac's hypotheses and the changing magnetic fields here:

http://www.themistsofavalon.net/t3358p120-messages-from-the-little-serpent-abba#67403


Hi All!

There is some significant scientific content in this 'Kryon Channeling' in regards to the topological transformation of the 4D-spacetime Minkowski metric into a 5D-spacetime de Sitter metric. The references to 'cosmic consciousness' is relevant to the nature of this website and is addressed in its content.
Any questions regarding this channeling and the scientific content should be directed to John Shadow on yahoo forums or be asked on this website for due consideration.

John Shadow



LIVE KRYON CHANNELLING
"The Great Scientific Bias"

This live channelling was Given in the Washington DC area
November 7, 2009

To help the reader, this channelling has been rechannelled [by Lee and Kryon] and added onto, to provide even clearer understanding. Often what happens live has implied energy within it, which carries a kind of communication that the printed page does not. So enjoy this enhanced message given in Gaitherburg, Maryland.

---

Greetings, dear ones, I am Kryon of Magnetic Service.

Quickly it occurs, does it not, the transition between Human Beings and one who is channelling a message from beyond? Perhaps it is a little too quick for those who would be in judgment about what is taking place here? But what my partner did not tell you is that there is no actual transition, since I'm always "under the surface" with him. This is his choice to have the energy of me in this way... to be able to flip back and forth in the messages of love between him speaking and me speaking. So we say to you, Human Being, that any of you can get to the place where there is little or no transition between you speaking and your Higher-Self speaking.

What I wish to speak about this day is difficult to define. I let my partner come up with a title for this channelling, for humans enjoy that. They want to realize a "compartmentalization of expectation." They wish to have some kind of identity process on everything they do, so I'll let him do it. For what I'm going to speak of is perception of dimensionality like I never have before. I wish to give you some of the mechanics of it, and a little bit about how it works, and also a little bit about what my partner calls the creation of the wild card... those things that you don't expect or don't believe in. So I have to start with an example.

Let me introduce you to Henry and Mary, they are cartoon characters, stick figures on a piece of paper. They are two dimensional. Of course, there are intelligent, since this is a parable. [Kryon smile] Their lives are not complicated, and they are simple stick figures. They have everything figured out. They even have love. The two dimensionality of their lives is all they have ever known, and they are pleased with it. They know the parameters of the piece of paper they're on, and they're happy with them. That's all they have ever had. They know what they can do and what they cannot do. Henry and Mary are satisfied and content with their reality.

Along comes a free thinker, one who has been drawn a little different. This odd character begins to speak to both of them about the potential of a third dimension... the idea of "up and down." He speaks of 3D instead of 2D, as they currently enjoy. It's the beginning of the concept of a kind of reality that they have never seen, and one they don't feel they participate in, nor can they really understand it.

Let's look at what Henry and Mary do with this information. First, they don't comprehend it. It's a little too high-minded for them. Second of all, it is outside of their reality, so they're not really that interested. They don't have to use it, so to them it's conjecture and so they don't believe it really is important or exists. It becomes a fantasy of science, something that will never pertain to Henry and Mary, who after all, are 2D drawings on a piece of paper.

There are many who sit and read this 2D piece of paper who are similar. Anything out of your 3D reality doesn't interest you. Not by choice, but because you are part of the paradigm that always was... a paradigm in 3D that you have lived all your life. It's a reality that is difficult to think beyond, and many really could care less about studying it. After all, what's wrong with the reality they are in? It works.

The new shift that is upon you is one of quantumness. It is going to require the Human Being to understand more about what is around them, which is invisible to them, but which is very real. They must come to an understanding, and therefore a belief, that not all things are viewable and understandable within 3D thinking, and that there is so much more that is actually part of their world, but requires a logic beyond what they are used to in order to comprehend it.

The best way I can begin this study in the time allotted is to take you on a journey and give you some information. There will be some things in this message that will be interesting to those who love science. To others who are not science minded, it might not relate, but they can still participate in the analogy that I'm giving, and understand the lesson.

I wish to take you to a real place, but for today, it must be only in your creative mind. The place is real, but you can't go there at the moment... not yet. The interesting thing is that each of you has actually been where I'm taking you, when you were not on Earth. It was before you were ever Human, and we spent time here. It's an unbelievably beautiful place. The view is, shall we say, unearthly. I want to take you just outside and above your own galaxy, looking at the spiral from above. Come with me for a moment. Pretend for a moment that the pressures of space and the temperatures don't apply to your Human body. None of those things matter, for you're in a protected bubble that is your spiritual self. All together, we go and we will watch this magnificent sight.

As a Human Being, you're struck with the silence of space, not understanding or even appreciating the fact that every single star sings a song. I hear them all. Silence to you is a symphony to me. For the vibratory rates of the light that is emitted from the stars all combine into a chorus, a manipulation of vibrational sonority that is beautiful. The universe sings to me, for I am quantum. The parts of you that are quantum are beginning to broach past the three-dimensional parts. That meld, that confluence, is going to create paradigms of thought that are different from any others on the planet. For there has been no time on the planet like this one, where you're asked to think out of the box of your comfortable reality, and go beyond the wall of your natural bias. Look at your galaxy with me for a moment. The beautiful spiral of it, is all moving slowly together as one... rotating slowly like a plate of lights. Take it all in.

I give you science today. I give you knowledge today that will only come about and be known within your future. And because of the transcriptions that are taken today, there will come a time when you will point to this particular message and say, "Kryon was right." And when you do, when the science confirms what I tell you today, I want you to look at the entire message. Because then your belief factor will also know that I speak truth when I speak about your relationship to Spirit, to the creator in you. I'm right when I talk about what is in front of you and your future, and the only reason I give you the science now is because your linearity and your bias will connect them in the future. "As goes one, goes the other," you'll say, "therefore I will pay attention to all that is said."

Looking at the Galaxy

It's beautiful, isn't it, as we are suspended here above your home Galaxy? In what you call the silence of this moment, looking at the galaxy moving so slowly, spiraling all together as one, it's unbelievable, unearthly, spectacular beyond words. Now I take you inside and tell you a little bit of what's happening that is a mystery to your science. There are odd things out here that don't fit earthly paradigms or rules. They don't fit your physics.

Henry and Mary, the two stick figures on the page, had scientists also. They had their 2D laws for physics, and that's all they needed. Everything worked just fine as long as they stayed on the page. You have four laws of physics, because you're in technically in 4D, and those laws work just fine. Those laws have proven themselves over and over, and as long as you stay in 4D (which you call 3D), they will always work.

Here's an esoteric question for you. Take a look at the stick figures Henry and Mary. How many laws of physics are there really for the 2D characters? Is there a whole set that encompasses multi-dimensional reality, or just enough to satisfy 2D? The answer should be obvious. Physics is complete no matter how you perceive it. Therefore Henry and Mary are only aware of, believe in, and are using, 2D, but all the laws are still there... ready to be discovered. 3D may not be something the stick figures understand, but it sits there ready, anyway. So extend that thinking and let me ask you this, three-dimensional creature: If I told you there were six laws of physics, covering a dimensionality that you don't see, how many are there for you? The answer is the same as for Henry and Mary. There are more than you know about, even if you are only aware of, and actively using, the four you have.

Do you see? The four laws you have, work fine. There is nothing wrong with them, but there are more, and that's why we take you here above your galaxy to show it all to you, and to present something that astronomers also can see. Look: Something is weird with the way the galaxy is moving. Did you notice?

We've given you the two additional laws of physics before, and this is not the time to explain them again. But when you get into an interdimensional realm, you're looking at multi-dimensional energies that must contain more information than your current physics. You have four laws now. Call them Newtonian, Euclidian, Einsteinium if you wish. These are the ones that brought you to where you are today. But now gaze with me at your spiral galaxy for a moment and watch it move. It does not move like your solar system.

The laws you have of objects in motion carry with them a three-dimensional bias of consistency. Your science looks for empirical laws and they find what they believe is true for everything. But what they don't realize is that there is a bias applied. It only works in one direction... in 3D. If you apply the rules only on that one playing field of time, you can apply linear mathematics and figure out what you need from that. It's all in a straight line, all forward, never changing, always the same. You might say your science is biased in simple consistency!

"Kryon, what's wrong with that? Sounds find to me!" Here comes the free thinker who is saying: "Interdimensional things do not apply to 3D logic or bias. The laws of interdimensional weak and strong forces are beyond 3D understanding, and may even seem to be chaotic and inconsistent."

Let me give you a further explanation. Your solar system works like you expect it does. Within the kinds of physics you have applied to the way things move in space, you have objects that are closer to your sun that move faster, like Mercury, for example. Then there are objects further away from the sun that move slower (the outer planets). The laws of orbital mechanics are in play. The distance from the sun develops into the 3D laws of orbital mechanics based upon the rules you have discovered for gravity, mass, distance and speed. And the rules are correct...for 3-D. Again, it lets you send spacecraft to the planets, to be so precise, to meet them in orbit, to take pictures and analyze them.

But look for a moment with me right now... this is not the way your galaxy is moving. It's in an elegant motion that defies the law of the inverse square (a law that defines how energy dissipates with distance from the source). It defies the basic laws of gravity and force. It defies the simple, biased, singular attributes of the way things move in space. Look at your galaxy with me. Watch it spin. It's almost like it was on a platter. Everything moves together. Everything! It's all rotating at the same speed, relative to the center... like a giant wheel that is all connected. This giant platter behaves like all the stars are pebbles, and are somehow glued to the fabric of space, all moving together.

How can that be? What are you seeing? Let me give you a hint and a clue: We've spoken about the weak and strong interdimensional forces which are the undiscovered laws five and six of physics. The way your galaxy moves is all about what's at the center of the galaxy, and displays these forces. You think it's a black hole, but it isn't. There's far more to it than you would imagine. Have you noticed in physics there is always polarity? From the smallest atomic structure to the largest, there is always polarity. You also see this in magnetics. It's also hiding in gravity. It's a staple of energy everywhere, everywhere. There are always two kinds of energy, and they work against and with each other to create dimensional reality. Matter itself is one polarity of reality, and anti-matter is the other. Always look for the push and pull, for it will show the way to the answers to the most perplexing issues of physics.

At the center of every galaxy there are "the twins." The twins are in the middle of the Milky Way as well. You've got two energies: One pushes and one pulls. However, you see it in your perception as one giant Black Hole. You assume the gravity of the Black Hole is somehow gripping that spiral and making it spin together in an unusual fashion which violates all the laws of Newton. It's not so. What's happening in the center of your galaxy is beautiful. It is an elegant interdimensional force that is not gravity, which spreads through the entire region of your entire galaxy, a force that glues it together in a way that you do not have laws to explain... yet. In addition, there is something hiding that science is only now beginning to wrestle with.

All this explanation, to get to a place of logic for you that will broach a very big issue. Simply stated it is this: When you step into interdimensional physics, and this includes the energies of what you call spirituality, you will find something you didn't expect: Consciousness... physics with an attitude. The interdimensionality of your galactic center has consciousness. It has to. Anything interdimensional is aligned with creation. I'm speaking of things you don't understand. These are high minded, sometimes unbelievable attributes that haven't really been broached in this way before. When you break the linear logic wall down from what you expect in linear physics, you're going to run up against things that don't make sense to your bias. They won't make sense... not just because they're in a quantum state, but they contain something else that "consistent 3D science" does not wish to accept... intelligence in physics.

Your science is very proud of the Big Bang Theory. They have it all figured out and they have a timeline for it. This is really funny to us! How can you have a timeline for a quantum event? There is no time in a quantum state, yet they have it all figured out. They've even figured out that there's a residue they can measure that proves they're right. How clever of them!

Let me ask you something, if you smell that wonderful residue aroma of bread cooking in the kitchen, what does that tell you? Does it say, "bread was cooked here four billion years ago" or does it say, "it's being cooked now"?

It's the bias of straight line thinking in a singular time dimension that smells the bread and calculates how long ago it was cooked! There is no understanding that the quantum event of the "Big Bang" is still happening. It explains the energy of Universal expansion. It even begins to explain the "energy of what you can't see." The "residue" they measure is the proof of the reality of an event still in progress as you see it in 3D, but an event that is the reality of creation, within a quantum state.

Look at what a 3D mismatch the current theory is: How could everything have come from nothing, then at a speed greater than the speed of light, instantly expanded, violating every law of current physics, to create the current mass of the universe in a nano-moment? Yet the bias of singular linear thinking lets all that happen in the time line of an instant... and they have it all figured out. They should all be celebrating with Henry and Mary! [Kryon humor]

Let me tell you something I have never, ever described to you before. The center of your galaxy spit out the matter that is you. Science has it backwards. The twins in the center of your galaxy lead to the twins in the center of all the other galaxies. Millions of them, billions of them. They're all connected in a way you cannot fathom outside of space, outside of time, like strings between friends who have consciousness. Not the kind of intelligence and consciousness that you see in your brain, no. Instead it's a benevolence, an intelligent glue that postures the universe in love. I told you that you wouldn't understand all of this. This is high-minded, high-thinking, and many are simply not ready for it.

The Gaia Effect

Let's go to something else. Life on the planet, and the way it was created, has become controversial because there are those in science who must linearize it all. Darwin gave you the possibilities of an evolved life system. He showed how it might work, perhaps, in a random selection of biology over and over through billions of years, creating what you have now. But then, enter The Gaia Effect.

Scientists are looking at earth history and they're starting to see something very bothersome to other scientists: There may be a consciousness that has created life. Naturally, true science does not want to think this way, for 3D straight line thinking of your current science does not allow for rules outside the box of total consistency. The real irony here is that singular consistency bias does not allow for creator bias. Could the universe be biased toward life? In this irony, the Human is biased due to limited dimensional thinking, and the Universe is biased in love.

The controversy goes like this: Earth history shows that life continued to be created and destroyed on the planet through four billion years. It started and it stopped and it created itself and destroyed itself over and over. Whereas life was once looked upon as an "against all odds" attribute of the planet, and nowhere else in the Universe, it now is seen as having been created again and again!

Some say, "Well, that's a random event happening." Really? What are the odds after life had destroyed itself, of the that incredible randomness striking again? How's that for evolution? Something that didn't work... returning! What do you think about that? Scientists are beginning to consider The Gaia Effect, as a consciousness coming from somewhere, somehow, that is biased to create life. It's outside of the purview of what you would call chance. Over and over it happened, until the planet it got it right. Photosynthesis was the answer, for it created a balance... plants and trees to consume the byproduct of life. So finally, the balance began.

It took a long time for that, but life was always created again until the "system" got it right. Even when the system snuffed life out, it returned! Even when the earth was barren of life because it hadn't worked out, it was created again up to five times. Science is starting to see this and is wondering how it is that earth seemed biased to create life. Some say there's a consciousness; some say that that is not true... there couldn't be, just couldn't be.

But there is, dear one, and it's an interdimensional consciousness that glues things together. Because when you get into an interdimensional state, you're starting to touch the face of God, the creative energy of the universe, and one that is indeed, biased in love.

Geological Surprises - Rethinking time

There are those who study the way the earth geologically came about, and again, in their straight-line thinking, they are biased. They are biased because they look at erosion patterns, they look at the way things used to be, then they apply specific universal laws to everything on the planet from then on. Well, there are some surprises: Have you heard the latest? How long did it take to cut the Grand Canyon? How many millions of years would the water have to trickle by in order to cut the canyon as it stands today? One million years, two million? It's still posted on the placards on the historic sites of how long it took. But now geologist are starting to change their minds because they have discovered other attributes that don't make sense. Now they're assigning a timeline of approximately three hundred years!

What happened to their logic? What they're now seeing is a wild card. That is to say there was no trickle of water. Instead, there was a sea that emptied into it... a ferocious torrent of water that cut the rock over a much shorter period of time. Outside the paradigm of thinking, it is, and accurate it is. You see where I'm going with this? It is the consistent biases that keep you in a straight line rut like the 2-D figures on the piece of paper. You've got to start thinking out of the box and look for what else there might have been. So I've given you the Grand Canyon story, so that you can absorb the next one.

The Unspoken Geology of Lemurian Existence

I've told you some odd things about the planet, and geologists always roll their eyes. For Kryon gives you information that is often "geologically impossible," they say. I told you about Lemuria. I've told you that the original Lemurian civilization was centered on dry land at the base of the highest mountains on earth, measured from the bottom to the top, which is now Hawaii. It is one big mountain with several peaks, and the peaks are what now stick out of the water today, which you call the Hawaiian Islands in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

In the days of Lemuria, we told you that the land around the base was dry. Geologists laugh. It's in the middle of the Pacific Ocean! How could that be? I'm going to tell you how it could be. First, you must understand that geologically, 50,000 years ago is not a significant enough time for something like plate tectonics to have an impact on this attribute. 50,000 years is actually very little time in geology... yet the water level at that time was more than 400 feet lower than it is now. This is because you were in the process of a water cycle which we have discussed before. So that's one of the attributes that came into play. However, the other attribute is the biggest reason, and one we have never spoken of before.

The mountains of Hawaii slowly move over what is called a hot spot, that is to say it slowly moves over a tremendous volcanic core of activity that has existed there for millions of years. 50,000 years ago this hot spot was in the process of a giant "bulge" that actually gradually lifted the floor of the ocean around the Hawaiian mountain, more than six thousand feet. That is to say the mantel of the earth bulged enough due to the volcanic pressure, to lift those mountains higher than they are now, to create a relatively small area of dry land that contained the mountain of Hawaii. When the lava was released, and it was, the bubble slowly deflated. This took several thousand years, without a cataclysmic eruption, as it was slowly released itself on the peaks of the mountain and poured into the sea, building yet more land around Hawaii. This created a situation where the base of the Hawaiian mountain was above sea level for a while. The slow release caused the bubble to subside, and Lemuria slowly was flooded. This is the story we told you originally, and the reason the Lemurians became sea faring, and moved to many other places.

Convenient, it is, for the doubters, that all the evidence of Lemuria has been destroyed as it should be. It makes you wonder. It makes you wonder if these things might be so. But a linear thinker will tell you that this can't be so, since they have never seen evidence of it in history. You haven't seen that kind of bulge before, therefore we have the same "Grand Canyon" effect, where the truth lays hidden due to biased consistency. What you never saw is therefore not possible.

By the way, the evidence is indeed there of the bulge, for the striations of the ocean floor still show an odd symmetry around the mountain, giving hints that it was once stressed upward through volcanic influences, and then subsided. There are also bones of animals at those depths, buried deep, that would tell a biologist that what is on the ocean floor in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, was once exposed to sunlight... about 50,000 years ago.

Divine Creation - The Proof is in the Odds

Let me tell you about creation. Astronomers are starting to talk about Intelligent Design. Now we're getting somewhere, since they're starting to understand that the quantumness of the universe might indeed have consciousness. Against all odds, you live in a parameter, an attribute in space that statistically continues to be "against all odds." You are in a universe created for life! If you could throw the dice of physics and create a universe, it would never come up this way. Never. Statisticians have said that it's out of the possibility of chance... yet you sit in an earth teeming with life. You sit in a universe teeming with life. There is life on the planets around you, but you just haven't found it yet. Microbial it is, and it represents the beginning attributes of single-celled life. It's all there. You'll see. Take a trip to Europa (moon of Jupiter), and look around a little in the ocean. You'll see. Life is absolutely the way of the universe... everywhere. You'll see. And it's against all odds that it happened, and science is now seeing that. It is so out of the statistical model of the creation of any universe, that they have labeled it Intelligent Design. There has to have been a plan.

In the middle of your galaxy, the twins exist, pushing and pulling interdimensional energies that literally have an intelligent complement to them. All of the stars move together in unison with it. Forces that are way beyond gravity are involved. It's an interdimensionality that glues the galaxy together, and that is something I want to speak of because it has to do with your future.

Your Future

The futurists of your society have a tendency to look at what was, and then project what will be. Do you see the straight line thinking? In a bias of consistency, they say, "Because of this, therefore, there will be this." They're looking at a consistent model of old energy, and in their projections, never giving it a chance to change. They are denying the very ability of Humanity to move past what was.

What is it that has been consistent on the planet regarding consciousness? Let's name the attributes: War, poverty, suffering, drama, a repeat of the same, a repeat of the same, a repeat of the same. Fractals of time that come and go and come and go, which create a consciousness that repeats and repeats and repeats.

Now you can see the bias, and why it's there. For anything that stays in the same cycle is expected to stay in it forever. This is also echoed in your physics. The more quantum you become, the less consistent you will be in thinking this way. That is to say, eventually you will expect things to happen that have never happened before. You are in a shift that is allowing for it, and all around you, things are changing. Listen: You cannot apply last year's rules to peace on earth. Is it possible? Yes... more than possible, it's the most probable outcome that we can give you.

What do last year's rules tell you about healing in your body? They say it's incurable? It isn't. What do last year's rules tell you about the fear that is being generated over the shift you are in? Does it tell you that you're going to be covered by water. Well, if you apply the rate at which things are melting and then you project all this into the future, you apply the discourse of poor science... then of course you will be! But that's awfully consistent of you, isn't it? You see what I'm saying? You're not giving any allowance for the wild card. You're not giving an allowance for the fact that this planet is moving into an entirely different magnetic attribute. The sun is cooperating; the universe is cooperating; it's almost like the twins can see who you are!

The twins are physics, a magnificent pushing and pulling of an interdimensional attribute which we cannot even explain to you. The twins are not God. The twins are a result of a God-biased universe, and an interdimensional physics that you are only just beginning to discover and question. Your science is only beginning to see it. The Gaia effect, Intelligent Design, the way the earth was put together, the way there were no accidents that you're here, against all odds... that ought to add up to something in your logic.

You are in the middle of a tremendous shift that you've asked for, that it's time for, that I came for! It's not one that's going to destroy you! You don't have to fear it. It's one you're in control of as you're becoming more quantum. You're starting to understand that the consistency of life as you have seen it is truly is an old paradigm. The consistency of fear, of hate, of disappointment... is beginning to change. If you want to be consistent with things, know this, that the love of God is the most consistent and persistent thing on this earth and in the universe. Consistent, it is! So persistent that it would not stop until life was created, and until love was discovered.

The Consciousness of Kryon

We wanted to paint a picture today. It was mostly scientific, partly a logic puzzle, to show you that your current 3D logic is not expanded. It's not the kind of logic you're going to need to move into the future. We told you to expect the wild card. Expect things that have not happened before. Change history by thinking about future things which may be evolutionary and represent wild cards themselves. Can you recognize some of those wild cards in your very immediate past? How many times do we have to give you these things to look at? None of the quatrains of Nostradamus are accurate today. Books have been written about the tremendous upcoming war with Islam. Well, someday you can read them and laugh, because it's not happening that way. That entire scenario is based upon a consistent, unchanging consciousness on earth, where everything repeats in an expected old pattern, and it isn't!

Are you the expected pattern on earth, or are you the wild card? You see, there are things coming that you didn't expect. I know these things for I see the potentials that are not openly available to you. It's the consciousness which is "baking in the oven" that is working right now in ways that you do not expect. This is not future fortune telling. It is instead just stating the facts of the potentials of the minds on the planet... where they're going and what they're thinking.

I want you to leave this place with hope. We saved this message for this particular group. It's an advanced message, and it does not fall on the ears of those who were just here for the first time or in the energy for the first time. It falls on the ears of old souls. Don't you remember this? Remember this with me, for you expected it. That is why you are here, and that is why you will return.

Finally, this: I was with you at the wind of birth, each one of you. Before you slipped into this planet, before the angels stood around the bed and sang to your mother at the joy of your birth, I was there. Right before you came again, I inquired like I always do, "Is this really something you want to do? Look at the potentials, and the hardships, the disease and sorrow of being Human. Do you really want to go back?" You looked at me like you always do and said, "Send me in. I can hardly wait to get back and finish what I started."

Now you have some of the first signs you've ever had since you were a Human, that this planet can move into graduation, vibrate higher and become part of a confluence of energy that you've only dreamed about... and you're sitting on the edge of it.

I am Kryon, lover of humanity. This is the truth I give you today. I give this message in order to instill in within your hearts and in your minds, the hope that these things are so and that they are true. Perhaps some of you today will leave here differently than you came because of this. And so this particular message will be given again in a different form for a different crowd, but every bit as loving and poignant.

I am Kryon. And so it is.

KRYON