https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ijph2hsuSAE&list=PLOTVdVzesDmon5cEYjDL-56yPAOCyxiqd
WELCOME TO MARS - PART 1
NANUXII wrote:Hey Carol , very interesting presentations and the whole Mars thing fascinates me on a few levels. I assume you have more info on this subject than i would. So can i ask some questions to bring me up to speed ?
Firstly what is the " reported " purpose of going to mars ?
THEY'VE HAD BASES ON MARS FOR YEARS. I PERSONALLY KNEW SOMEONE WHO WORKED THERE. IN ADDITION, ANDREW BASIAGO TALKED ABOUT HOW HIS FATHER ALSO STORED CLASSIFIED PAPERS AT ONE OF THE OFFICES ON MARS. I ALSO SAW A PICTURE OF THE OFFICE SPACE INSIDE AT THE MARS BASE. THERE IS A BRAKE AWAY CIVILIZATION FROM EARTH ON MARS AND THEY DO RESEARCH THERE.
Secondly why is " Randy Cramer " allowed to speak about ATS programs in a public environment ?
PERHAPS IT'S A SLOW RELEASE PERTAINING TO DISCLOSURE. HAVING TALKED TO OTHERS WHO ARE ALSO INVOLVED IN DISCLOSURE WHO WERE WITH THE SECRET GOVERNMENT THEY SHARED THAT THE WERE FOLKS WITHIN THAT WANTED SOME OF THE INFORMATION TO BECOME PUBLIC. THE PRESIDENT JUST ANNOUNCE A NEW MILITARY 'SPACE' DIVISION SO IT WOULD SEEM THIS IS ALL TIED TOGETHER IN VARIOUS SUBTLE WAYS.
Thirdly a curious reply to Simon Parkes about the technology to rebuild a human after trauma. Why did he phrase the response like that ? its about 12 min 30 sec in on part 3.
EMERY SMITH ALSO DISCUSSED THIS PROCESS IN THE WORKSHOP WE WERE IN WITH HIM. HE ALSO MENTIONS IT ON A VARIETY OF HIS PRESENTATION YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS CORY GOODE AND DAVID WILCOCK AS WELL. RANDY, CORY AND EMERY ALL HAVE PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THIS TECHNOLOGY
What Randy talks about and his descriptions are quite accurate in comparison to my experiences so on that level he is fascinating to me. But a large part of me thinks this is a pat of a bigger FF to be enacted.
POSSIBLY BUT IT MAY ALSO BE LEADING UP TO DISCLOSURE WHICH I SUSPECT IS PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ULTIMATE GOAL. AFTER ALL HIS UNCLE WORKED WITH TESLA AND IS ALSO INTERFACED WITH TIME TRAVEL.
Carol if you recall i was saying a major event was to take place around june / july 2029 ... Im now getting Aug 2027 ... so its shifted closer which can be interpreted in a few ways.
I THOUGH IT WAS MORE ALONG SPRING OF 2029, MARCH. THIS WAS ALSO DISCUSSED BY NAUGHTY BEAVER. POLE SHIFT POSSIBLE / PROBABLY, MEGA SOLAR FLARE / NIBARU - COMBINATION OF ALL 3?
id love to hear your thoughts :0)
N
N
Carol wrote:NANUXII wrote:Hey Carol , very interesting presentations and the whole Mars thing fascinates me on a few levels. I assume you have more info on this subject than i would. So can i ask some questions to bring me up to speed ?
Firstly what is the " reported " purpose of going to mars ?
THEY'VE HAD BASES ON MARS FOR YEARS. I PERSONALLY KNEW SOMEONE WHO WORKED THERE. IN ADDITION, ANDREW BASIAGO TALKED ABOUT HOW HIS FATHER ALSO STORED CLASSIFIED PAPERS AT ONE OF THE OFFICES ON MARS. I ALSO SAW A PICTURE OF THE OFFICE SPACE INSIDE AT THE MARS BASE. THERE IS A BRAKE AWAY CIVILIZATION FROM EARTH ON MARS AND THEY DO RESEARCH THERE.
SO Its for research ?
Secondly why is " Randy Cramer " allowed to speak about ATS programs in a public environment ?
PERHAPS IT'S A SLOW RELEASE PERTAINING TO DISCLOSURE. HAVING TALKED TO OTHERS WHO ARE ALSO INVOLVED IN DISCLOSURE WHO WERE WITH THE SECRET GOVERNMENT THEY SHARED THAT THE WERE FOLKS WITHIN THAT WANTED SOME OF THE INFORMATION TO BECOME PUBLIC. THE PRESIDENT JUST ANNOUNCE A NEW MILITARY 'SPACE' DIVISION SO IT WOULD SEEM THIS IS ALL TIED TOGETHER IN VARIOUS SUBTLE WAYS.
Thirdly a curious reply to Simon Parkes about the technology to rebuild a human after trauma. Why did he phrase the response like that ? its about 12 min 30 sec in on part 3.
EMERY SMITH ALSO DISCUSSED THIS PROCESS IN THE WORKSHOP WE WERE IN WITH HIM. HE ALSO MENTIONS IT ON A VARIETY OF HIS PRESENTATION YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS CORY GOODE AND DAVID WILCOCK AS WELL. RANDY, CORY AND EMERY ALL HAVE PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THIS TECHNOLOGY
Ok but why did Randy phrase his answer to Simon that way ? does it not seem strange as a reply " Yes I would say that we definitely had the technology " This is strange language to use about an event that actually happened and to refer the technology as past tense , i realise he is talking about the past as the subject however the technology is also referred to as in the past as opposed to the method. These are intended as prepositions but rather qualify as propositions.
What Randy talks about and his descriptions are quite accurate in comparison to my experiences so on that level he is fascinating to me. But a large part of me thinks this is a pat of a bigger FF to be enacted.
POSSIBLY BUT IT MAY ALSO BE LEADING UP TO DISCLOSURE WHICH I SUSPECT IS PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ULTIMATE GOAL. AFTER ALL HIS UNCLE WORKED WITH TESLA AND IS ALSO INTERFACED WITH TIME TRAVEL.
Carol if you recall i was saying a major event was to take place around june / july 2029 ... Im now getting Aug 2027 ... so its shifted closer which can be interpreted in a few ways.
I THOUGH IT WAS MORE ALONG SPRING OF 2029, MARCH. THIS WAS ALSO DISCUSSED BY NAUGHTY BEAVER. POLE SHIFT POSSIBLE / PROBABLY, MEGA SOLAR FLARE / NIBARU - COMBINATION OF ALL 3?
Nothing to do with Nibiru ... Nibiru as a threat does not exist imo. Im talking about a planed " happening " that is linearly dictated by event sequence.
id love to hear your thoughts :0)
N
N
NANUXII wrote:
If i were to make a call i would say his presentations are a series of well researched responses originally learned by means of audio and pictorial files.
When he speaks of his experiences he is tapping into his auditory and sensory creative brain as opposed to his memory complex. Lots of shoulder shrugging and squinting. When he speaks of his assignments and superiors he has a lot of trauma associated with his interactions. When someone talks about negative or traumatising events, their blood capillaries in the nose contract and cause them to touch their nose. At the beginning of part 3 when he talks about being shot/hacked to pieces he does not show any sign of trauma... this is very curious to me.
Also in part 2 at 11 min 10 sec approx you see him talking about his learning process and then putting it into a actual dynamic almost fluffing one key word.
There is a lot more i picked up on but i think ive made my point. Regardless i have on many occasion enjoyed him talking and find his data fascinating. So what im saying is his information is accurate , probably as high as 70% or more but i don't believe he actually had those experiences.
On the other hand when i watch Corey Goode talk i dont see this behavior, he is much more believable as a result.
N
N