tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

    Companies proclaim water the next oil in a rush to turn resources into profit

    mudra
    mudra


    Posts : 23307
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 70
    Location : belgium

    Companies proclaim water the next oil in a rush to turn resources into profit Empty Companies proclaim water the next oil in a rush to turn resources into profit

    Post  mudra Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:14 pm

    Companies proclaim water the next oil in a rush to turn resources into profit

    Mammoth companies are trying to collect water that all life needs and charge for it as they would for other natural resources

    “Is now the time to buy water?” enquired the email that showed up in my inbox earlier this week.

    Its authors weren’t worrying about my dehydration levels. Rather, they were urging me to think of water in quite a new way: as a commodity to invest in.

    Making money from water? Is this what Wall Street wants next?

    After spending nearly 30 years of my life writing about business and finance, including several years dedicated to the commodities market, the idea of treating water as a pure commodity – something to bought and sold on the open market by those in quest of a profit rather than trying to deliver it to their fellow citizens as a public service – made me pause.

    Sure, I’ve grown up surrounded by bottled mineral water – Evian, Volvic, Perrier, Pellegrino and even more chi-chi brands – but that has always existed alongside a robust municipal water system that delivers clean water to whatever home I'm occupying. All it takes is turning a tap. The cost of that water is fractions of a penny compared to designer bottled water.

    This summer, however, myriad business forces are combining to remind us that fresh water isn’t necessarily or automatically a free resource. It could all too easily end up becoming just another economic commodity.

    At the forefront of this firestorm is Peter Brabeck, chairman and former CEO of Nestle.

    In his view, citizens don’t have an automatic right to more than the water they require for mere “survival”, unless they can afford to pay for it. For context, the World Health Organization sets such “survival” consumption levels at a minimum of 20 liters a day for basic hygiene and food hygiene – higher, if you add laundry and bathing. If you’re reading this in the United States, the odds are that flushing your toilet consumes 50 liters of water a day.

    Brabeck is right to argue that we risk depleting the world’s supply of fresh water irresponsibly through careless and thoughtless consumption of an apparently free resource. How many lush golf courses should we be sustaining with millions of gallons of water in parts of the world that are naturally arid, like Arizona or southern California?

    And then there are the bizarre mixed messages that some California residents are getting: don’t water your lawns in the state’s long-running drought that has depleted its aquifers. On the other hand, some are also being warned they’ll be fined if they don’t keep their lawns and neighborhoods looking nice.

    But Brabeck probably isn’t the best standard-bearer for the cause of responsible water management, by any stretch of the imagination.

    Consider the fact that as the drought has worsened, Nestle’s Nestle Waters North Americas Inc division – the largest bottled water company in the country – has continued to pump water from an aquifer near Palm Springs, California, thanks to its partnership with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians. Their joint venture, bottling water from a spring on land owned by the band in Millard Canyon, has another advantage: since the Morongo are considered a sovereign nation, no one needs to report exactly how much water is being drawn from the aquifer.

    In the Canadian province of British Columbia, Nestle has been using another loophole.

    Until this year, British Columbia didn’t have rules that required the company to report how much it drew from the province’s aquifers – or pay a penny to the government’s coffers in exchange for the resource.

    As of last year, therefore, Nestle was able to bottle 265m liters of fresh water and pay nothing for the resource that Brabeck believes should have an economic price attached to it – at least, when it is consumers that are paying that price. (For the record: the situation in BC is in the process of changing: a new Water Sustainability Act, passed this spring, will be fully in force by spring 2015.)

    read on: Arrow http://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/jul/27/water-nestle-drink-charge-privatize-companies-stocks

    Love Always
    mudra
    mudra
    mudra


    Posts : 23307
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 70
    Location : belgium

    Companies proclaim water the next oil in a rush to turn resources into profit Empty Re: Companies proclaim water the next oil in a rush to turn resources into profit

    Post  mudra Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:29 pm

    Nestlé subsidiary Poland Spring set its sights on the tiny town of Fryeburg, Maine, USA nearly a decade ago, pushing to build a huge bottling plant and take long-term control over the town's spring water. Nestlé has sued the small town multiple times, arguing that its right to grow market share is more important than the town's right to self-determination.

    Nestlé wants to lock up its control over Fryeburg’s water with a contract that -- including extensions -- lasts until 2057. This lifetime contract would be unprecedented in the United States, and would be a major victory for water privatization companies. Tell Nestlé and Poland Spring to stop bullying the people of Fryeburg.

    sign petition:  Arrow http://action.storyofstuff.org/sign/poland-springs-nestle-fryeburg

      Current date/time is Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:24 am