tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

5 posters

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:24 am

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl
    says:
    A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars,"
    Fawcett publisher, Books 1 and 2.

    He has documented many of the characteristics we may have received from our cosmic ancestors.

    It does show quite conclusively that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.

    I have merely carried this idea to its logical conclusion.

    If mankind is a hybrid descendant of the ancient' astronauts, surely there would be some, appearing periodically,
    who would be genetically very similar to them.

    Would this not include their psychic powers?

    Could the great sleeping prophet, Edgar Cayce, have been one of these?

    Could Jesus Christ also have been one of these?

    A true descendant of the ancient astronauts.

    If he was a true genetic duplicate of them he would also have their powers and possibly their knowledge.

    I cannot say whether he was born with this knowledge or whether he established psyphic communication with our cosmic family,
    but it is plain that he had powers far beyond those of mortal man.

    Could he have been an example of what the ancient astronauts were like?

    Jesus stated that the Father and him were one.

    Could he have actually meant that literally?

    He may have been an exact duplicate of his (our) ancient Father.

    He may have even been a clone of the cosmonauts.

    Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention.

    Could this have been implanting a clone into Mary's sterilized egg?

    Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?

    That does not fit to the thing that rh neg blood is not cloneable ....I belive ....
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:26 am

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl
    says:

    Do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in the sand?
    What we don't know will still affect us.
    You will not see unless you look
    . Only through knowledge will we find truth.

    I have searched, in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative blood was a natural earthly occurrence.

    Instead I have found proof that the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.

    For many years people have been searching for the wrong thing.

    Could the true "missing link" actually be man himself?

    The unknown link between earth and the stars - hybrid man.

    Man may be the missing link between primate and extraterrestrial.

    It seems inconceivable to me that those working on the evolution theory have overlooked this possibility.

    How can they state, that these people are lacking a factor contained in all other earthly primates,
    including the naked ape, and not ask why?

    What other characteristics are common among these people that are uncommon to other people?

    Is there a real difference other than just a different blood?
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:28 am

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl
    says:

    The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy.

    Could this tradition.have been for a reason?

    Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)?

    The clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye.

    Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters,
    from other tribes, scattered throughout the earth.

    Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic origin.

    The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.

    Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth?

    No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry.

    Where did this tradition come from?

    People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why?

    important could this have been to primitive cave men?

    Struggling to survive, to chart their genealogy?

    They had no understanding of modern genetics and inheritance.

    So why should they preserve their genealogy?

    Were they told, by the ancient astronauts, to preserve their heritage, until a future date

    when they would return and it would be understood?

    Until a time, like now, when their descendant would be able to understand the message they were leaving.

    Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their genealogy,

    they were told that future generations would understand.

    Are we that future generation?

    Was there a message left for us to understand?

    Do we have the courage to look for the answer?
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:34 am

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl
    says:

    For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings.

    Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?

    If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors?

    If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?"

    Why was their seed blessed?

    Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification?

    Why were they told to preserve their geneology?

    Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?

    In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation.

    We can have any of numerous combination of traits inherited from all our ancestors.

    Nothing more and nothing less.

    Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor,
    their blood would have evolved the same way.

    Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic.

    It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past.

    All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor.

    But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative.

    If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible.

    Where did the Rh negatives come from?

    If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?

    All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species.

    Relative size and color makes no difference.

    Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species?

    Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child.


    Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus),
    thereby destroying the infant.

    Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring?

    Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally.

    This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey.

    This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.

    No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from.

    Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation
    not descendants of a different ancestor.

    If we (those who carry rh negative blood) are a mutation, what caused the mutation?

    Why does it continue with the exact characteristics?

    Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry?

    Who was this ancestor?

    Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data,
    for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.

    The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood.
    About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene.
    The average among most people is only 157%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little.

    The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative.

    The Samaritians and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.

    Could the Basque people be one of these colonies?

    Or could it have been the original colony on earth?

    The origin of the Basques is unknown.

    Their language is unlike any other European language.

    Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis.

    Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.

    Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose."

    Who were the children of these marriages?

    Genesis 6:4 "God came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old."
    From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildren - men of Israel, male children of God, not children of man

    - Ex. 34:23." Ex. 34:7 states "The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation."

    It is plain that something is inherited, could it be the blood?

    Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except God.

    These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God! (The blood of the Gods?)

    This message has been written for thousands of years.

    There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:36 am

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl says:

    The original Europeans who carried the rhesus negative blood factor 35 000 years ago are probably the original Europeans who painted the comic strips and other art in the caves of southern France and northern Spain which includes the Chauvet-Pont-d' Arc cave and the Lascaux cave paintings found in the Pyrennes.

    The highest percentage of people with rh- blood is found in the Atlas mountains of Morocco(40%). The next highest are the Basques, reported in different publications as having 25 and 32%, depending on location. The people of northwest Ireland, the Highland Scots and the western islanders of Norway all have between 16 and 25%, while the Lapps of Norway and Finland have between 5 and 7%
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:43 am

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl
    says:


    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl -- The "Head-scratching" Discovery

    It was here, in tracing the vertical evolutionary record contained in the human and the other analyzed genomes
    that the scientists ran into an enigma.

    The "head-scratching discovery by the public consortium," as Science termed it,
    was that the human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree.

    How did Man acquire such a bunch of enigmatic genes?

    In the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates (such as the lineages of yeast, worms, flies or mustard weed
    - which have been deciphered) to vertebrates (mice, chimpanzees) and finally modern humans,
    these 223 genes are completely missing in the invertebrate phase.

    Therefore, the scientists can explain their presence in the human genome
    by a "rather recent" (in evolutionary time scales) "probable horizontal transfer from bacteria."

    In other words: At a relatively recent time as Evolution goes ,

    modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of Life,

    but horizontally, as a sideways insertion of genetic material from bacteria…

    An Immense Difference Now, at first glance it would seem that 223 genes is no big deal.

    In fact, while every single gene makes a great difference to every individual, 223 genes make an immense difference to a species such as ours.

    The human genome is made up of about three billion neucleotides (the "letters" A-C-G-T which stand for the initials of the four nucleic acids
    that spell out all life on Earth); of them, just a little more than one percent are grouped
    into functioning genes (each gene consists of thousands of "letters").

    The difference between one individual person and another amounts to about one "letter"
    in a thousand in the DNA "alphabet."

    The difference between Man and Chimpanzee is less than one percent as genes go;
    and one percent of 30,000 genes is 300.

    So, 223 genes is more than two thirds of the difference between me, you and a chimpanzee!

    An analysis of the functions of these genes through the proteins that they spell out,
    conducted by the Public Consortium team and published in the journal Nature,
    shows that they include not only proteins involved in important physiological but also psychiatric functions.

    Moreover, they are responsible for important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA
    - the so-called "Eve" DNA that humankind inherited only through the mother-line,
    all the way back to a single "Eve."

    That finding alone raises doubt regarding that the "bacterial insertion" explanation.


    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl -- A Shaky Theory

    How sure are the scientists that such important and complex genes, such an immense human advantage, was obtained by us-"rather recently
    "-through the courtesy of infecting bacteria?

    "It is a jump that does not follow current evolutionary theories," said Steven Scherer,
    director of mapping of the Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine.

    "We did not identify a strongly preferred bacterial source for the putative horizontally transferred genes,"
    states the report in Nature.

    The Public Consortium team, conducting a detailed search, found that some 113 genes (out of the 223) "are widespread among bacteria"
    - though they are entirely absent even in invertebrates.

    An analysis of the proteins which the enigmatic genes express showed that out of 35 identified,
    only ten had counterparts in vertebrates (ranging from cows to rodents to fish);
    25 of the 35 were unique to humans

    . "It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from human to bacteria,"
    Science quoted Robert Waterson, co-director of Washington University's Genome Sequencing Center,
    as saying. But if Man gave those genes to bacteria, where did Man acquire those genes to begin with?
    8 hours ago · Like · 2

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl-- THE ROLE OF THE AUNNAKI

    Readers of my books must be smiling by now, for they know the answer.

    They know that the biblical verses dealing with the fashioning of The Adam
    are condensed renderings of much much more detailed Sumerian and Akkadian texts,
    found inscribed on clay tablets,
    in which the role of the Elohim in Genesis is performed by the Anunnaki
    - "Those Who From Heaven to Earth Came."

    As detailed in my books, beginning with The 12th Planet (1976)
    and even more so in Genesis Revisited and The Cosmic Code, the Anunnaki came to Earth some 450,000 years ago from the planet Nibiru
    - a member of our own solar system whose great orbit brings it to our part of the heavens once every 3,600 years.

    They came here in need of gold, with which to protect their dwindling atmosphere.

    Exhausted and in need of help in mining the gold, their chief scientist Enki
    suggested that they use their genetic knowledge to create the needed Primitive Workers.

    When the other leaders of the Anunnaki asked:

    How can you create a new being? He answered:

    "The being that we need already exists; all that we have to do is put our mark on it."

    The time was some 300,000 years ago.

    What he had in mind was to upgrade genetically the existing hominids,
    who were already on Earth through Evolution,


    by adding some of the genes of the more advanced Anunnaki.

    That the Anunnaki, who could already travel in space 450,000 years ago,
    possessed the genomic science (whose threshold we have now reached) is clear not only from the actual texts but also from numerous depictions
    in which the double-helix of the DNA is rendered as Entwined Serpents (a symbol still used for medicine and healing)
    -- see illustration 'A' .

    When the leaders of the Anunnaki approved the project (as echoed in the biblical "Let us fashion the Adam"),
    Enki with the help of Ninharsag, the Chief Medical Officer of the Anunnaki,
    embarked on a process of genetic engineering, by adding and combining genes of the Anunnaki with those of the already-existing hominids.

    When, after much trial and error breathtakingly described and recorded in antiquity, a "perfect model" was attained,
    Ninharsag held him up and shouted:
    "My hands have made it!"

    An ancient artist depicted the scene on a cylinder seal (illustration 'B').

    And that, I suggest, is how we had come to possess the unique extra genes.

    It was in the image of the Anunnaki, not of bacteria, that Adam and Eve were fashioned.

    Fabiola Tiamar Kühl -- A Matter of Extreme Significance

    Unless further scientific research can establish, beyond any doubt,
    that the only possible source of the extra genes are indeed bacteria,
    and unless it is then also determined that the infection ("horizontal transfer")
    went from bacteria to Man and not from Man to bacteria,
    the only other available solution will be that offered by the Sumerian texts millennia ago.

    Until then, the enigmatic 223 alien genes will remain as an alternative and as a corroboration by modern science of the Anunnaki
    and their genetic feats on Earth .
    burgundia
    burgundia


    Posts : 5520
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Poland

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  burgundia Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:19 pm

    Mercuriel
    Mercuriel
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 3497
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Walking the Path...

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  Mercuriel Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:34 am

    THEeXchanger wrote:Fabiola Tiamar Kühl
    says:

    Ninharsag held him up and shouted:
    "My hands have made it!"

    An ancient artist depicted the scene on a cylinder seal (illustration 'B').

    And that, I suggest, is how we had come to possess the unique extra genes.

    It was in the image of the Anunnaki, not of bacteria, that Adam and Eve were fashioned.


    Wink


    _________________
    Namaste...

    Peace, Light, Love, Harmony and Unity...
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:00 pm

    In 1972 Professor Jean Dausset conducted a study of the Caucasian blue/green eyed, red heads of Easter Island, who are in fact a significant part of the Polynesian story. He found them to have an ancient strain of Caucasian blood, which can also be found in the Basques of Spain, characterised by A29 and B12. The analyses revealed that 39% of unrelated Basques and 37% of the Easter Islanders were carriers of the HLA gene B12. These were the highest and second highest proportions tested throughout the world. The figures for A29 were similar. The Easter Islanders, with 37%, had the highest proportion in the world, while the Basques were second with 24%. The most remarkable thing was; that the two genes were found as a haplotype (combined genetic markers) in 11% of Easter islanders and 7.9% of the Basques. No other people in the world had remotely comparable figures."

    In fact, from the above tests, the Easter Islanders appear to be of a more pure ancient Caucasian racial stock than the Basques! Although living on one of the most remote islands in the world undoubtedly had a part to play in this, it is highly likely that these people reflect the gene pool of Caucasians that once existed in America.THIS BLOOD TYPE THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT IS, RH NEGATIVE BLOOD

    http://www.users.on.net/~mkfenn/GeneticsrewritesPacificprehistory.htm
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Tue May 21, 2013 8:03 pm


    how can an RH negative mother - and, an O positive father - get an RH NEG O baby -

    Victoria Salmon says:

    what it means Susan is that rh + is dominant.
    If your dad is rh pos but you are neg it means he must be +- if he was ++ then you would be rh pos
    even though mum is neg..
    in order to be rh neg you must be --

    (remember you get one from dad and one from mum just like your parents did)..
    you got one neg from mum and one neg from dad
    which means one of dad's parents was rh neg
    or they carried the recessive allele..
    yes both parents can be rh + and still have an rh neg child
    if the both carry recessive neg allele (1 in 4 chance)..
    otherwise in your case mum -- dad +-
    there is 50% chance of rh neg child..
    let me know if this makes sense the way I am explaining it.
    Jenetta
    Jenetta


    Posts : 1978
    Join date : 2010-04-16
    Location : British Columbia Canada

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty RH Negative Blood - Universal Donor - Higher Then Normal IQ

    Post  Jenetta Tue May 21, 2013 9:07 pm

    Oh well...I guess the rest of us "poor Dumbo's" who don't have Rh Negative blood are out of luck!! Back to school you go to learn your "abc's" and hope for a replacement blood transfusion from the school nurse.Razz

    ______________________________________________
    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 992990
    Carol
    Carol
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 31770
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  Carol Wed May 22, 2013 12:37 am

    hmm... mom was RH neg but not O. But I ended up O pos. It's amazing how this all plays itself out over the different generations.


    _________________
    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol
    burgundia
    burgundia


    Posts : 5520
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Poland

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  burgundia Wed May 22, 2013 12:10 pm

    My father was A RH+, my mother was B Rh+...My sister is 0 Rh + , Iam B Rh-. I know that my paternal grandmother was Rh-. However for me to be Rh- my mother had to be the carrier of the gene as well.
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Wed May 22, 2013 1:22 pm

    glad you found the information helpful,
    i also have it on both sides of my family,
    although, i'm sure my dad has more 'o' positive,
    there are definitely connections on that side,
    that would have likely been RH NEGATIVE
    (I HAVEN'T YET gotten around to that side of my tree)
    ~ susan
    burgundia
    burgundia


    Posts : 5520
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Poland

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Rh Negative Blood is NOT a Mutation!

    Post  burgundia Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:33 am

    http://beforeitsnews.com/power-elite/2012/10/rh-negative-blood-is-not-a-mutation-2440092.html?utm_medium=facebook-post&utm_content=awesm-fbshare-small&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fawe.sm%2FdDezJ&utm_campaign&utm_source=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fl.php%3Fu%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fawe.sm%252FdDezJ%26h%3DZAQETq_og%26s%3D1

    Interestingly, popular sciences endeavor to attribute Rh-neg blood groups to “mutations.” A solid alternative case may be extended to the conclusion that Rh-neg is NOT a mutation, but possibly the original human blood group. This, however, does not reflect tenured thought, and thus has never been adequately researched.
    That there was a group of “pure” humans, not directly related to the evolutionary processes on Earth, is a distinct possibility. This reasoning would suggest that the original humans on our planet where not directly related to the apes, but at some point were “MADE” or “genetically engineered” to give such impression.
    Perhaps it was never intended that the Rh-positives become the dominant species. That through some as yet undetermined epoch, the genetically impure group gradually became the controlling species, except for several remote enclaves, initiated a wide-ranging genocidal pogrom, effectively wiping out those who gave birth to them.
    All of which begs the questions: What reasons were the sub-species created, what was the process of conquest, what was the duration, and does it continue?
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:45 pm

    you get one blood factor from mother; and; one from father
    very likely Carol
    your mum was rh NEG O
    and, your dad was 0 positive

    thus; you are 'o' from mother, and, '+' from father

    -- an rh neg o mother
    and, and 0 positive father
    (the positive will already override the negative)
    but, in order to get an rh neg 0 baby from that combo
    the 'o' positive male, has to have the recessive gene for rh neg 0

    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:16 am



    Blood types: A= Adam

    AB= Adam/Beast

    B= Beast

    O= DRAGON -O STAR serpent in garden and is Cain
    THEeXchanger
    THEeXchanger


    Posts : 5352
    Join date : 2011-06-04
    Location : My own little heaven on earth

    rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ - Page 2 Empty Re: rh neg o blood - universal donor - higher than normal iQ

    Post  THEeXchanger Tue Oct 01, 2013 8:17 am


      Current date/time is Sun May 12, 2024 8:59 am