FLAT GLOBE

Published on Mar 19, 2015

Have you ever met a real Flat Earther? Did you know there are fake Flat Earther's too? The entire Flat Earth Society along with people like Daniel Shenton and Mark Sargent are controlled opposition frauds who present themselves as legitimate Flat Earthers but in reality are propagandists, enemies of the plane truth, mixing lies, satire and false Flat Earth arguments into their material to deter neophytes from conducting further research. For example Daniel Shenton and the FES claim Earth is constantly rising up at 9.8 m/s to account for gravity. This is a ridiculous easily proven impossibility, however, as I explain in the following interview, but by making these easily refutable false flat Earth arguments, these agents muddy the waters and poison the well of legitimate flat Earth research. Mark Sargent recently made a few good flat Earth videos to ingratiate himself into the movement, but now he's claiming the Moon, stars and planets are holographic projections, that seasons are caused by unknown processes underneath the Earth, that Admiral Byrd discovered "a semi-permanent barrier" in Antarctica and other non-sense. When I asked him to provide evidence for such outlandish claims (and to refute the abundant evidence to the contrary) he admits to having no evidence but continues to promote and propagate these false claims regardless.

Read about the history of the controlled opposition Flat Earth Society here: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atlanteanconspiracy.com%2F2015%2F03%2Fflat-earth-society-controlled-op.html&redir_token=8k--x6lNcYCng8LeNyAxBO8Otuh8MTQyNzE0MzQzM0AxNDI3MDU3MDMz

For an in-depth analysis of Mark Sargent's attempted infiltration and derailment of the movement, see our thread at IFERS here: http://ifers.boards.net/thread/41

The following interview features myself, Eric Dubay, a genuine, legitimate flat Earth researcher talking with DJ Buttamilk (Dan Lefkowitz) of Brattleboro, Vermont community radio. Notice how after just an hour of listening to a Real Flat Earther like in this interview it is difficult to deny the flat Earth truth, yet after listening to a fake Flat Earther like Mark Sargent for 2 hours, many people have commented they are completely turned off by the subject now and want nothing more to do with it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FaxXvgAln0

For more information about the flat, motionless Earth under your feet, see the following links:

http://ifers.boards.net
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com
http://www.aplanetruth.info
http://www.waykiwayki.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G90A2kg1bWs

Published on Feb 8, 2015

Matthew Boylan, former NASA operational graphics manager, worked for years creating photo-realistic computer graphics for NASA. Now a vocal Flat-Earther, Boylan claims that NASA’s sole reason for existence is to propagandize the public and promote this false ball-Earth heliocentric worldview. Originally recruited because of his skills and reputation as a hyper-realist multi-media artist, he started doing projects like photoshopping various lighting and atmospheric effects onto images of Earth, the Moon, Jupiter, Europa, etc. Having proved himself, and wanting to promote him to do more classified work, a room of NASA higher-ups during a party, as a type of initiatory-rite, explained to him and a few others in detail the reality of the Geocentric Flat-Earth model and how they have fooled the entire world!

Refusing to be a part of their deception, Boylan cut his ties to NASA, began researching the Flat-Earth for himself, and has recently become a powerful voice on the lecture circuit and the internet exposing NASA and their heliocentric hoax. In his comedic lectures he speaks candidly and eloquently about how simple it is using nothing more than Adobe Photoshop and a video editor to create any and every type of image NASA purports to be “receiving from the Hubble telescope.” He points out how in most ball-Earth videos lazy NASA graphics workers don’t even bother changing cloud structures in ordinary or time-lapse footage; the same shape, color and condition cloud cover often stays completely unchanged for 24 hour periods and longer! Boylan states unequivocally that every picture and video of the ball-Earth, all the Moon/Mars landings, the existence of orbiting satellites, space stations, and all Hubble images are hoaxed. He even quips anecdotes about how NASA officials and astro-nots privy to the Flat-Earth truth would laugh hysterically at the brain-washed zombie public who unquestioningly believe their televisions.

https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atlanteanconspiracy.com%2F2015%2F01%2Fflat-earth-comedy.html&redir_token=SmMMg1B70rl1Bef4pMzgKBsekwp8MTQyNzE1MTQ4MEAxNDI3MDY1MDgw

https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fuser%2FTheNASAchannel&redir_token=SmMMg1B70rl1Bef4pMzgKBsekwp8MTQyNzE1MTQ4MEAxNDI3MDY1MDgw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQt9vq3sdtQ

burgundia wrote:I am surprised that NASA insiders are not afraid to talk about all NASA lies.

http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/search/label/Above%20Top%20Secret

Boylan states unequivocally that every picture and video of the ball-Earth, all the Moon/Mars landings, the existence of orbiting satellites, space stations, and all Hubble images are hoaxed.

burgundia wrote:

The following interview features myself, Eric Dubay, a genuine, legitimate flat Earth researcher talking with DJ Buttamilk (Dan Lefkowitz) of Brattleboro, Vermont community radio. Notice how after just an hour of listening to a Real Flat Earther like in this interview it is difficult to deny the flat Earth truth, yet after listening to a fake Flat Earther like Mark Sargent for 2 hours, many people have commented they are completely turned off by the subject now and want nothing more to do with it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FaxXvgAln0

Having proved himself, and wanting to promote him to do more classified work, a room of NASA higher-ups during a party, as a type of initiatory-rite, explained to him and a few others in detail the reality of the Geocentric Flat-Earth model and how they have fooled the entire world!

burgundia wrote:Lisa Harrisonin that video is wearing a peculiar top with a very ancient moon symbol. Behind her the veil created a pyramid. The station CCN and then the lion in a circle have been explained by Bill in one of his videos (I believe I posted the video in my thread we are being hypnotized)

burgundia wrote:

I know I said years ago that the greater good was something that should be preserved -  that JFK, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11 were inevitable.  I still believe it.  And I understand the decisions. . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8-YdgU-CF4

mudra wrote:
In truth I believe we all have our own model , our own visions of the universe and as we begin to unravel it's building blocks
we are then able to see how we made it come to life in the first place.

[3:58:54 PM] Shiloh Za-Rah:

So what ARE those building blocks mudra?

They are NOT whimsicalities of human imaginations

The idea that it is the shadow of the Earth eclipsing the Moon during lunar eclipses is just an assumption which can be proven incorrect. Even if it was correct, however, it doesn't disprove the flat-Earth because the flat-Earth is round, just not spherical.

. . . “It is alleged by the learned that at a lunar eclipse the earth casts a shadow on the moon, by intercepting the light of the sun. The shadow, it is alleged, is circular, and as only a globe can cast a circular shadow, and as that shadow is cast by the earth, of course the earth is a globe. In fact, what better proof could any reasonable person require? ‘Powerful reasoning,’ says the dupe. Let us see. I have already cited a case where sun and moon have been seen with the moon eclipsed, and as the earth was not between, or they both could not have been seen, the shadow said to be on the moon could not possibly have been cast by the earth. But as refraction is charged with raising the moon above the horizon, when it is said to be really beneath, and the amount of refraction made to tally with what would be required to square the matter, let us see how refraction would act in regard to a shadow. Refraction can only exist where the object and the observer are in different densities. If a shilling be put in the bottom of a glass and observed there is no refraction. Refraction casts the image of the shilling UPWARDS, but a shadow always downwards. If a basin be taken and put near a light, so that the shadow will shorten inwards and DOWNWARDS; but if the rod is allowed to rest in the basin and water poured in, the rod will appear to be bent UPWARDS. This places the matter beyond dispute and proves that it is out of the range of possibility that the shadow said to be on the moon could be that of the earth.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (78)

Your shadow question, like Erastothenes supposed heliocentric proof, is assuming the Sun is millions of miles away and the light rays hit the Earth at the same angle. Using sextants and plane trigonometry, however, you can prove the Sun in only 32 miles in diameter a few thousand miles over the surface of the Earth. This is why the Sun's light rays can be seen shooting in many directions as shown here . . .

http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2014/11/the-flat-earth-conspiracy.html