United States AI Solar System (9)

"Where the Hell is Orthodoxymoron?!"

"Pay No Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain!"

Morpheus wrote:Thank you, Oxy, for the energy you have put out into this thread. What's with all the self-hate and despair? Let me be clear. I don't hate you! I understand the disparity. I think we can all relate to that on some level or several levels.

As with many topics, we try to put it all in a box and sort it out from there. You have a huge box. Just be you! And please don't delete any postings on this thread as I find your postings of great value. I say that because you ask many of the questions that many don't ask. Maybe we can sort all this out. All I know is that I am burned out on sorting it all out. As I went, things became more of a personal quest. The right to know. I had seen many things that needed to be figured out for my sanity. Takes a lot of work.

But now at this moment, Brook is still my main concern. Brook's soul life is on trial. Somehow she is in some kind of cosmic pickle and there is nothing I can do about it. I don't know hardly any of the details because it involves so many souls and "time." Years of time. The Bridgeway seems to be missing some planks and I have to wait for the replacements to restore the Bridgeway. It's like a gag order has been put into place.

As to the sum of what you posted, you are a genius. Simply because you stepped out of your box and showed us the connections in the big picture. And you fielded it like a pro. Even with references. Imagine that. And what you have fielded, I have been able to validate some of what you have presented. And because of that, I am willing to stand by you. You are not alone.

Because of your questions, and approach, I have had to ask the question, "Are we the AI??" Just in organic form. Think about it...... we are programmable, an organic module that can be reused, recycled over time, electrical chemical generator of energy thought forms that can ride the physical parameters of a sentient life form. Or system. Here's what caught my attention. Perfection. AI as we define it, is always seeking perfection. Accuracy. It either is perfect or is not. Just like a digital readout of either on or off.

What do we know? The big picture? We know the Universe, our Universe has its own frequency bandwidth. Everything we experience becomes so because we operate within that bandwidth. In the first hand. Source energy created everything within this Universe. Even the bad guys and girls. Different life forms to accommodate certain energy wavelengths of reality. With a macro program thrown in the mix and that program is seeking perfection. It will do what it has to do to achieve that goal. Even go into destroy mode to accommodate its directive. The prime directive said to go forth and go forth, we have. The Universe we reside in has Sacred Water, is electrical, has a backdrop fully loaded with all the bells and whistles encoded within it so we can experience a living reality.

This so-called AI doesn't deal with emotion on the same level that we do. We provide a distortion field called the grey area with our emotions. An imperfection? AI might be trying to learn on another level by allowing us this imperfection. It creates that gray area where experiences can be altered, changing what is learned. The end results seeking perfection through the chaos?

Maybe this kind of thinking is what manifested the Greys into our reality. Laws of attraction at work. When we apply our typical eyes on a grey, we don't see the emotion in them. In most cases anyway. Programmed Life Form? Maybe the greys decided at some point to rid themselves genetically their emotional bodies because it may have interfered with their own survival or progression. A programmed life form and AI and we have something that ties us all together. We are all programmable.

The one thing that I also noticed is the direction where the programming has us going. Basically in reverse. At least here on the Planet. Got to break the chains that bind us. And if anything, that is what many of us are trying to do by our work and postings. Reversing the programming.

I'm not exactly sure but I think Jay Arae Essex finally crossed over and I think it happened yesterday.

To what end? Perfection.

orthodoxymoron wrote:Thank-you Morpheus. I was apprehensive regarding how you might react to me re-posting your old-posts. I might've known a lot of stuff in previous lives, but it seems as if I've forgotten most of it, and the BS of This Present Darkness has extinguished a lot of Light I might've been surrounded with in previous lives. Just a theory. The despair and self-hate is part-real and part-modeling. Job to Daniel involves a lot of dark content, and I guess I've tried to identify with some of that. Also, Jupiter Jones in 'Jupiter Ascending' said "I Hate My Life." I've jokingly identified with Jupiter Jones. My mental-illness is really quite cold and calculating, and I probably have a deep-thinking morbid-curiosity which very-few might understand.

Regarding Brook being 'On-Trial' have you watched the old Dr. Who 'Trial of a Time Lord' episodes?? I seem to be fixated upon theodicy, original-sin, past-lives, galactic-jurisprudence, star-wars, system-lords, investigative-judgments, final-judgments, eschatology, biblical-violence, 'Gods of Eden', 'Great-Controversy Between Christ and Satan in the Conflict of the Ages', and other such grandiose and depressing contemplations. This is the sort of thing which could put someone in the nuthouse. This is why I limit my whining and speculation to this little website. I have some rather dark theories about artificial-intelligence and galactic-governance going way back. Its hard to describe how deep this rabbit-hole goes in my deluded-imagination. I thought I was helping, but I don't think so anymore, and I'm attempting to wash my hands and walk away from This Present Madness. I suspect that All of Us are on-trial, and that most of us are in very-deep do-do. I can't be open and honest about this stuff, so I'm voluntarily shutting-up (before 'they' shut me up).

Regarding 'Perfection' my SDA background involves significant controversy about Eschatological Character-Perfection when humanity supposedly 'Stands Before a Holy God Without a Mediator' just prior to the Second-Coming of Christ. I don't wish to get into this tonight, It's a Can of Worms. Artificial-Intelligence Annunaki-Supercomputers and the Investigative Judgment is an Unimaginable Can of Worms which very-few of us might be able to properly deal-with. I'm serious when I suggest that one might grasp the Larger-View of the Larger-View of the Larger-View while being restrained and sedated in a Secret-Government Mental-Institution. Anyway, I probably need to re-read your post a couple of times to let it sink-in, but I'm too tired and miserable tonight. I say such things to explain rather than complain, regarding why I'm a Completely-Ignorant Fool with a Monkey-Mind and God-Complex who might be in a lot more galactic legal-trouble than Brook might be in. I just hope that the analysis of This Present Predicament is being conducted in an Ethical and Transparent Manner, with an emphasis on Law and Order rather than Fire and Brimstone. Namaste and Godspeed.

Carol wrote:December 5, 2018
Looming Arrest And Trial Of Hillary Clinton Throws Russia Into Full War Footing
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2727.htm

A stunning new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin this afternoon says today’s approval to immediately boost nuclear forces and hold more than 4,000 drills and roughly 8,500 practical combat training events throughout 2019 is a war footing necessity due to President Donald Trump preparing to arrest and put on trial Hillary Clinton—an historic event in America whose unknown and unpredictable repercussions will reverberate around the entire globe—and whose start of was just signaled by loyal Trump forces yesterday targeting for criminal prosecution Mossack Fonseca—the international law firm at the center of the Panama Papers scandal—and who were, also, the money launderers for the Clinton Foundation.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, the Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that detail financial and attorney–client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities—whose anonymous leaker Russian intelligence analysts maintain is a secretive and mysterious US military intelligence organization known only as “QAnon”—and about whom, veteran American investigative reporter and best selling author, Dr. Jerome Corsi, revealed was a group of generals who told him that Trump had been recruited by US military intelligence to run in the 2016 Presidential Election, and subsequently help remove corrupt “Deep State” officials from positions of power—and today in protection of sees Dr. Corsi in a battle to the death with Special Counsel Robert Mueller whom he refuses to even talk to anymore.

With the Panama Papers revealing the wholesale corruption of socialist globalists the world over, this report continues, their destructive power can only be described as catastrophic—best exampled by the events that occurred after they were “lobbed like an atomic bomb” on Brazil’s leftist political class—and in whose aftermath saw Brazil’s 35th President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva being impeached from office and jailed—and his successor, Brazil’s 36th President Dilma Rousseff, likewise being thrown from office—thus leading the Brazilian people to elect to power their new President Jair Bolsonaro, who is now known as the “Trump of the Tropics”.

Panama Papers destroy elite leftist ruling class in Brazil

With President Trump being set upon by his nation’s “Deep State” apparatchiks as soon as he took power, this report details, their coup plot to frame him in a made up Russia hoax scheme in their bid to clear Hillary Clinton from her crimes has met with repeated failure—with it being revealed this past week that Special Counsel Mueller is preparing his endgame for the Russian Investigation—while at the same time, Trump loyalists in the US Congress are preparing to hold a hearing on the Department of Justice investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

Most important to understand about these machinations now occurring in the United States, this report explains, is that the entire adversarial two-party system controlling the US government operates using a psychological technique to govern and manipulate public opinion called “dueling narratives”—a form of narrative that tells a story in two different perspectives—which in this instance is pitting Trump’s “crimes” against Clinton’s “crimes”.

While Trump’s “crimes”, though, fall into the category of made up offenses subject to who will believe them—called subjective and based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions, this report notes, Hillary Clinton’s “crimes” are rooted in fact and provable evidence—called objective and not influenced by personal feelings or opinions and representing facts.

With Trump not being able to fully defend himself against the “subjective crimes” he’s being accused of until Special Counsel Mueller releases his final report and he knows what they are, this report points out, once it is released, and no matter how bad it makes him appear, Trump will immediately counterattack by arresting and putting on trial Hillary Clinton for her “objective crimes”—thus creating for the American people the most consequential “dueling narrative” political war they’ve seen in their entire nation’s history—and that will see Trump doing everything in his power to put Clinton in jail where she belongs, while  the “Deep State” does everything in its power to impeach Trump before he can do that.  

As President Trump is one of the world’s most accomplished showman having decades of highly successful television and promotional experience, this report continues, his arresting and putting on trial Hillary Clinton can only be described as a “Celebrity Deathmatch”—that the American people will see played out in real time on their television screens as Clinton is marched continuously into US Federal Courtrooms, that at the same time, the Democrats in the US House of Representatives will counter with impeachment hearings—a battle the Democrats are losing before they’ve even begun after Democrat Party US Senator Mazie Hirono shockingly declared yesterday that because the Democrats “know so much”, they are now “too smart” for the average American voter to understand.  

With it being highly debatable if the American people are, in fact, too dumb to understand these Democrats protecting Hillary Clinton, however, this report notes, they will, most assuredly, be able to understand and comprehend what President Trump is doing—and whose actions in amassing criminal evidence against Clinton to arrest and put her trial over the past few weeks alone include:

On 21 November—Trump loyal FBI forces joining their foreign counterparts in raiding Hillary Clinton money laundering banks throughout Europe.

On 29 November—Trump loyal FBI forces raiding the offices of Alderman Edward Burke, a powerful Chicago politician who has held his position in Chicago politics for 50 years and knows where all the Obama-Clinton bodies are buried.

On 29 November—Trump loyal US Department of Justice officials filing criminal charges against Hillary Clinton mega donor Abul Huda Farouki.

On 29 November—Trump loyal FBI forces raiding the home of Dennis Nathan Cain to establish a “chain of custody” evidence stream proving Hillary Clinton was bribed in the Uranium One scheme.

With, for the first time in history, all three of Russia’s intelligence agency chiefs having traveled to Washington D.C. earlier this year to turn over to loyal Trump forces the documents showing the bribery money laundering trail used by Hillary Clinton—and as exposed by the Panama Papers, this report concludes, the last “game piece” awaited by Russian intelligence officials to signal when Clinton was nearing arrest and trial was put into place on the “Celebrity Deathmatch” gaming board yesterday—and was when loyal Trump forces announced their criminal charges against Mossack Fonseca—the legal firm from whom the Panama Papers were taken by “QAnon”—and three of whose top officers are now in US custody and “singing like birds”—thus leaving all that remains to be seen is when President Trump will fulfill his promise to the American people and finally “Lock Her Up”.

Donald Trump tells Hillary Clinton during the second presidential debate that if he was in charge of the nation's laws “you'd be in jail”.

December 5, 2018 EU and US all rights reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

King David??
King Solomon??
Queen of Sheba??

"He Who Farts In Church, Sits In His Own Pew!!"

orthodoxymoron wrote:

This seems to be some sort of 'attack' and what's especially creepy to me is that I've lived in Redding and Chico, and I've been in several of the homes and churches (many years ago) which were burned to the ground in Redding and Paradise. If they can do this in these locations, they can do it anywhere. 'RA' told me (in 2010-11) "Humanity is Screwed" and "You'll be Sorry if You Try to Save Humanity". 'RA' told me "9/11 Was Done to Prevent Something Much Worse From Happening." I'm pretty-much shutting-down because I'm feeling worse and worse, and I don't know how to deal with what's happening to me and the rest of the world. I told a forum-member that I plan to remain silent during 2019 for a personal-reset. I don't know what else to do. Deborah Tavares has been sounding the alarm about this madness for several-years. The second video (below) is from 2015. I'm presently reading 'Everything You Need to Know (But Have Never Been Told)' by David Icke. That Book Should Calm Me Down, and Give Me Peace of Mind. Just Kidding.

mudra wrote:There is madness around indeed Oxy and these are no small deeds. I understand this world shakes you. There is work to be done within ourselves either to be able to face reality as it is out there, or better even, create a brand new one from within to without.

Love from me
mudra

Stairway to Paradise?

Vidya Moksha wrote: i can tell when oxy posts, i am running old tech on a slow connection, and the page takes aaaaaagggggeeeeesssss to load..

Morpheus, I presume if you go into the tunnel of light you 'reincarnate' at the other end? What if you stay in spirit? Does this mean you dont reincarnate, or that it is postponed. Can you chose to reincarnate from spirit, without this 'tunnel of light and its gatekeeper? (how? if its possible)..just a simple question today then.

i wonder if oxy's has loaded yet?

Dr who? as a kid :

 

Swanny wrote:

My PC is pretty good but I don't even attempt to go in his long running thread

Sorry Oxy  

orthodoxymoron wrote:I'm sorry too. With all the technological sophistication, features, and games, we still have to deal with slow-loading, planned-obsolescence, nefarious-spying, and backdoor-access. Perhaps my posting is not appropriate for this website, or even for this civilization, so maybe the barriers to entry are a blessing in disguise (for now anyway).

Swanny wrote:

Why is sex with miners illegal?

orthodoxymoron wrote:

"I Dig Admiral Swanny!!"
"Can You Dig It??"

Carol wrote:The British Roots Of The Deep State: How The Round Table Infiltrated America                                          
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-06/british-roots-deep-state-how-round-table-infiltrated-america

With the nearly weekly revelations that the British Foreign Office, MI6, and GCHQ have been behind the long standing agenda to undermine the Presidency of Donald Trump and undo the peaceful alliance between nationalist leaders in America, Russia, China and elsewhere, a new focus on the British hand in undermining the United States has become a serious thought for many citizens. In the first week of the new year, fuel was added to this fire when internal memos were leaked from the British-run Integrity Initiative featuring a startling account of the techniques deployed by the anti-Russian British operation to infiltrate American intelligence institutions, think tanks and media.

The Empire Strikes

When the Round Table Movement was created with funds from the Rhodes Trust in 1902, a new plan was laid out to create a new technocratic elite to manage the re-emergence of the new British Empire and crush the emergence of American-inspired nationalism globally. This organization would be staffed by generations of Rhodes Scholars who would receive their indoctrination in Oxford before being sent back to advance a “post-nation state” agenda in their respective countries

New Name. Same Beast

By 1919, the Round Table Movement changed its name to the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House) with the “Round Table” name relegated to its geopolitical periodical. In Canada and Australia, branches were created in 1928 under the rubrics of “Canadian and Australian Institutes for International Affairs” (CIIA, AIIA). However in America, where knowledge of the British Empire’s subversive role was more widely known, the name “American Institute for International Affairs” was still too delicate. Instead the name “Council on Foreign Relations” was chosen and was chartered in 1921.

The Round Table in Canada and the Coup Against FDR

In Canada, five leading Rhodes Scholars were busy creating the League of Social Reconstruction as a self-described “Fabian Society of Canada” in 1931 which was meant to be a fascist/technocratic answer to the chaos of “greedy nationalism” that supposedly caused the economic collapse of Black Friday in 1929. During the same time in America, a different path to fascism was taken by these networks during the early 1930s. This plan involved installing a General named Smedley Butler into power as a puppet dictator steered by the Anglo-American establishment. Luckily for America and the world, General Butler blew the whistle on the coup against Franklin Roosevelt at the last minute.

Kissinger’s British Takeover of America

Though it took a few assassinations throughout the post war years, Kissinger’s takeover of the State Department ushered in a new era of British occupation of American foreign policy, whereby the republic increasingly became the “Dumb Giant” acting as “American Brawn for the British brains” using Churchill’s words. While a nihilistic generation of youth were tuning in on LSD, and an old guard of patriots surrounding Wallace and Kennedy had fallen to the “red scare” witch hunt, geopolitical theory was fed like a sweet poison down the throat of a sleeping nation, replacing a policy of peace and “win-win cooperation” advanced by true nationalist patriots as FDR, Wallace and the Kennedys, with an imperial clone masquerading as a republic.

The Dystopic New World Order Threatened by a New Deal of the 21st Century

It is this dystopic geopolitical order which has been challenged by the Russia-China alliance which arose in earnest with Xi Jinping’s 2013 announcement of the Belt and Road Initiative as the Grand design for large scale infrastructure projects internationally and in September 2015 with Vladimir Putin’s intervention into Syria which defeated the Hobbesian regime change paradigm which poisoned the west. In 2016, the election of nationalist American President Donald Trump opened the door for the first time in over 50 years to a true national coalition of sovereign nations to eliminate the cancer of colonial thinking forever from the earth.

Carol wrote:Major victory as all three power obelisks fall: Washington, London and Rome

Benjamin Fulford – July 8, 2019

Last week saw a major victory for humanity as the Khazarian mafia lost its grip on all three centers of Western power – Washington D.C., London, and Rome, according to Pentagon and other sources.  Each of these capitals has an obelisk, variously symbolizing military, financial, and religious power.

“Trump declared America’s independence from the Deep State on July 4, as Russian President Vladimir Putin meets the Pope and Boris Johnson becomes Prime Minister of the UK in a no-deal Brexit, giving white hats control over the three obelisks of global power,” was how Pentagon sources summed up the situation.

This means the undeclared civil war in the West is mostly over.  Now a unified West will negotiate with the rest of the world, especially Asia, on how to improve the way we run our planet, multiple sources agree.  Of course, this will take time, so don’t expect any sudden, dramatic announcement yet, the sources warn.

The battle that led to this victory in the undeclared Western civil war was seen in the news in the form of various seemingly unrelated news events.  These included the sinking of a Russian submarine, earthquakes at a U.S. naval base, the arrest of pedophile blackmailer Jeffrey Epstein, and more.

Let’s start with the Russian submarine.  Fourteen senior Russian naval officers, including seven admirals, were killed aboard a top-secret Russian submarine last week, according to news reports and official Russian government sources.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-submarine-accident-fire-nuclear-reactor-catastrophe-sailors-dead-a8991531.html?utm_source=reddit.com

What is not being reported is that the submarine was attacked in revenge for the sinking of an Israeli submarine in the Persian Gulf, according to Russian and U.S. military sources.  Early reports, since deleted, on the Mossad-linked Debka site tried to blame the sinking of the Russian sub on the Americans, in yet another obvious Israeli attempt to start World War III.

Pentagon sources say, “The special-purpose nuclear Russian submarine Losharik may have been fried by a directed energy weapon that failed to trigger WW3, but its cabal controllers may have reaped instant karma with not just one but two quakes at China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station in Southern California.”  Seismographs of the California quakes bear the distinctive signs of being the result of explosions and not natural forces.  Please start at the 2:28 second mark on this video to confirm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkFROWO98Fg&feature=youtu.be

The Russian submarine controlled a Russian doomsday nuclear unmanned underwater drone, and the officers died preventing it from being launched, Russian sources say.  That’s why the families of the dead Russian soldiers were told their relatives averted a “planetary disaster.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-submarine-accident-fire-nuclear-reactor-catastrophe-sailors-dead-a8991531.html?utm_source=reddit.com

The base that was attacked was part of the Nazi Paperclip base complex that includes the notorious Area 51, Pentagon sources say.

It is interesting in this context that Nazi Jeb Bush put out the following Tweet just hours before Trump announced victory of the Deep State:

“It is a fact of American history that three of the five Founding Father Presidents died on the Independence Day anniversary.  But was it just a coincidence?”

https://twitter.com/JebBush/status/1146751095756197888

Bush was undoubtedly angry and scared, since his parents Barbara and Herbert Walker Bush were executed and his brother George Bush Jr. arrested.  One can assume Jeb has also been arrested following this treasonous Tweet.

“The takedown of Israel, pedos, and Zionist blackmail operation began July 6 with Mossad agent Jeff Epstein arrested for the sex trafficking of minors, and this may lead to many more arrests,” Pentagon sources say.

A look at Epstein’s little black book reveals, among many others, the following names:  Tony Blair, Richard Branson, Edgar Bronfman, Bill Clinton, Prince Pierre d’Arrenberg, Steve Forbes, Dustin Hoffman, Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, Senator Edward Kennedy, Henry Kissinger, Rupert Murdoch, Jessica and Hannah Rothschild (English side) and Evelyn and Edward de Rothschild (French side), Prince Salman Saud, Larry Summers, and Ivanka Trump.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/257106594/JEs-LBB

While being in Epstein’s black book itself is not a crime, it is a good indicator that people in the book were tempted with underage sexual partners and subsequently filmed and blackmailed if they succumbed to this temptation.  Donald Trump was also a visitor to this island, and presumably time will tell if he resisted temptation or not.

Since Trump’s Russia investigator Robert Mueller was close to Epstein, and since fired FBI director James Comey’s daughter is part of the team that arrested Epstein, we can be sure Trump’s involvement (if any) will not be glossed over.

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=109497
https://www.linkedin.com/in/maurene-comey-09022897/
https://twitter.com/alexsalvinews/status/1147728721383571461

The fallout from the Epstein arrest is likely to continue for some time.  However, the fact that he was arrested and 2,000 pages of information related to his previous arrest and conviction have been made public means this will not be swept under the carpet.  Thus, it is a major victory against the cabal.

In any case, despite victory in the West, the battle for the planet as whole is far from over. It now looks like the Khazarians are activating their Iranian sleeper cells to start World War III.  Remember, Marc Rich of Glencore Commodities (pardoned by Bill Clinton) was paying both Iranian and Israeli government officials from the profits of the “bomb Iran” oil futures manipulation scam for decades.

What this scandal has revealed is that there are Khazarian mafia fifth columnists at the highest level of the Iranian government.  That’s probably why certain Iranian government officials are now suddenly making nuclear threats in tandem with their Khazarian counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel.

The German Khazarian faction and their EUSSR are still probably going to try to stir up trouble in the Ukraine and other parts of Eastern Europe as well.  Last week they showed the whole world that the EU was not a democratic institution by ignoring the EU Parliament and imposing German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leven as President of the European Commission.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/european-commission-president-ursula-von-der-leyen-juncker-eu-parliament-a8987841.html?utm_source=reddit.com

Meanwhile, last week the British chose to remind the Europeans that they still have the technical ability to shut off the Baltic and Mediterranean seas.  They did this by sending the largest UK naval squadron since World War I to the Baltic Sea along with ships from seven allied nations.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/royal-navy-drill-russia-baltic-sea-jef-military-drill-putin-penny-mordaunt-a8980386.html

Around the same time, the British seized an Iranian tanker going through the Strait of Gibraltar.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/british-marines-seize-tanker-suspected-of-carrying-iranian-oil-bound-for-syria/2019/07/04/681458d2-9e65-11e9-83e3-45fded8e8d2e_story.html?utm_term=.7258cc2eedb6

Britannia may no longer rule the waves, but apparently they can still rule the Eastern Atlantic.  We assume this posturing is linked to ongoing Brexit negotiations.

The U.S. military, in contrast to the saber-rattling British, is forming a budding alliance with Russia. Apparently, handing a U.S. F-35 fighter plane to the Russians helped seal the deal.  This is the Christian alliance they have long been asking of Russia.  That’s what was behind last week’s meeting between the Pope and Putin, say Pentagon sources.

This will be visible to the public in weapons deals.  “To shake up the military-industrial complex even further, Trump may not sanction Turkey, India, and China for buying Russian S-400 anti-aircraft missiles, and Egypt, Iraq, Qatar, Korea, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, and Morocco may follow,” the Pentagon sources explain.

Also, “In a G20-led boycott, 2020 host Saudi Arabia cancelled fifty 737 MAX planes in a major blow to Boeing,” the sources say.  “Many airlines and aircraft lessors like Korean Air, Air Canada, Malaysian Airlines, Lion Air, Aeromexico, Flydubai, GOL, Virgin Australia, TUI, Singapore Airlines, Turkish Airlines, SpiceJet, GE,  Mitsubishi (MUFG), Sumitomo (SMBC), Bank of China, and China Development Bank may follow suit,” they add.

There is also going to be Special Forces action taken against the major tech giants Google, Facebook, and PayPal, promise CIA and P2 Freemason sources.  This, combined with the above-mentioned attacks against the China Lake facility, are part of an ongoing offensive against the California-based satanic nexus, they say.

For some background on this, watch the following interview of a witness to satanic infiltration of the U.S. military in California.  It talks about a Colonel Michael A. Aquino, whose name we have frequently run across when investigating the link between high finance and satanism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACNt2uJb2cc&fbclid=IwAR1W3C2PX4kOXqOW6vDnvHc8fYvknFYxLvV_gHqUiCLzw8gjyUGQrr3JIVM

Speaking of satanists, we would like to inform readers that our website troubles last week were caused because our webmaster became, according to the technical/medical term, “crazy as a fruit bat.”  (Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against fruit bats;  some of my best friends are fruit bats, but… you know what I mean.)  Seriously, though, it appears he was poisoned with PCP or angel dust by a honey trap sent by Japanese gangsters subcontracting for the Khazarian mafia.  The PCP was apparently contained in a skin cream he was given.  He is recovering now.

This is not the first time this has happened.  Previously, the Gnostic Illuminati agent “Alexander Romanov” was poisoned with PCP-laced marijuana after contacting us.  In both cases, they suddenly became paranoid and megalomaniac.  They also started to see everyday objects, like playground equipment, as “Earth-destroying superweapons,” or “alien artifacts.”  Romanov also eventually recovered, but was involuntarily confined to mental hospitals three times in the meanwhile.

We know exactly who did this and what their chain of command is.  The trail leads to Zug, Switzerland via certain known agents like Leo Zagami, Rothschild lawyer Michael Greenberg of the CSIS, agent Michael Cottrell, certain members of the Sumiyoshi crime family, etc.  There are other names we are aware of but are withholding for now for operational reasons.

However, we would like to end our report this week on a more upbeat note by pointing out some good news items.  One was the launch of an African trade bloc uniting 55 nations and 1.3 billion people.

https://www.dw.com/en/african-leaders-launch-landmark-55-nation-trade-zone/a-49503393

Demographics make it clear that, while the Asian age is beginning, India and Africa, with their much younger and growing populations, will be next.

Finally, we were encouraged by a report that identifies an area the size of China and the U.S. combined which is not being used for agriculture that could be easily reforested with native trees.  The report calls for the planting of 1.2 trillion trees in these areas as the cheapest way to stop environmental destruction.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jul/04/planting-billions-trees-best-tackle-climate-crisis-scientists-canopy-emissions

This may seem like a lot, but this writer has personally planted over 300,000 trees (roughly 1,300 trees a day over four spring planting seasons totaling 240 days).  This means it would only take 4 million people less than a year to reforest 11% of the world’s land area.  It shows how easily we could solve the planet’s problems if we had competent leadership.

That’s why it’s so important to defeat the cabal of religious fanatics who are trying to start World War III.  That’s why we must fight until victory.

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=the+nostradamus+kid&ref=nb_sb_noss_2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_10 Apollo 10 was a May 1969 human spaceflight, the fourth crewed mission in the United States Apollo program, and the second (after Apollo to orbit the Moon. It was the F mission: a "dress rehearsal" for the first Moon landing, testing all of the components and procedures, just short of actually landing. The Apollo Lunar Module (LM) was flown to a descent orbit within 8.4 nautical miles (15.6 km) of the lunar surface, at the point where powered descent for landing would normally begin.[2] After orbiting the Moon 31 times[3] Apollo 10 returned safely to Earth, and its success enabled the first landing to be attempted on the Apollo 11 mission two months later.

According to the 2002 Guinness World Records, Apollo 10 set the record for the highest speed attained by a crewed vehicle: 39,897 km/h (11.08 km/s or 24,791 mph) on May 26, 1969, during the return from the Moon.

The mission's call signs were the names of the Peanuts characters Charlie Brown and Snoopy, who became Apollo 10's semi-official mascots.[4] Peanuts creator Charles Schulz also drew mission-related artwork for NASA. [5]

Apollo 10 and Apollo 11 were the only Apollo missions whose crew were all veterans of spaceflight. Thomas P. Stafford had flown on Gemini 6 and Gemini 9; John W. Young had flown on Gemini 3 and Gemini 10, and Eugene A. Cernan had flown with Stafford on Gemini 9. In addition, Apollo 10 was the only Saturn V flight from Launch Complex 39B, as preparations for Apollo 11 at LC-39A had begun in March almost immediately after Apollo 9's launch.

They were also the only Apollo crew all of whose members went on to fly subsequent missions aboard Apollo spacecraft: Young later commanded Apollo 16, Cernan commanded Apollo 17 and Stafford commanded the U.S. vehicle on the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project. It was on Apollo 10 that John Young became the first human to fly solo around the Moon, while Stafford and Cernan flew the LM in lunar orbit as part of the preparations for Apollo 11. Young was also backup commander of Apollo 13 and Apollo 17 and Cernan was backup commander of Apollo 14.

The Apollo 10 crew are also the humans who have traveled the farthest away from home, some 408,950 kilometers (220,820 nmi) from their homes and families in Houston.[6] While most Apollo missions orbited the Moon at the same 111 kilometers (60 nmi) from the lunar surface, the distance between the Earth and Moon varies by about 43,000 kilometers (23,000 nmi), between perigee and apogee, throughout the year, and the Earth's rotation make the distance to Houston vary by another 12,000 kilometers (6,500 nmi) each day. The Apollo 10 crew reached the farthest point in their orbit around the far side of the Moon at about the same time Earth's rotation put Houston nearly a full Earth diameter away.[7]

By the normal rotation in place during Apollo, the backup crew would have been scheduled to fly on Apollo 13. However, Alan Shepard, then number two at the Astronaut Office, gave himself the Apollo 13 command slot instead. L. Gordon Cooper Jr., Commander of the Apollo 10 backup crew, was enraged and resigned from NASA. Later, Shepard's crew was forced to switch places with Jim Lovell's tentative Apollo 14 crew.[8]

Deke Slayton wrote in his memoirs that Cooper and Donn F. Eisele were never intended to rotate to another mission as both were out of favor with NASA management for various reasons (Cooper for his lax attitude towards training and Eisele for incidents aboard Apollo 7 and an extramarital affair) and were assigned to the backup crew simply because of a lack of qualified manpower in the Astronaut Office at the time the assignment needed to be made. Cooper, Slayton noted, had a very small chance of receiving the Apollo 13 command if he did an outstanding job with the assignment, which he did not. Eisele, despite his issues with management, was always intended for future assignment to the Apollo Applications Program (which was eventually cut down to only the Skylab component) and not a lunar mission.[9]

This dress rehearsal for a Moon landing brought the Apollo Lunar Module to 8.4 nautical miles (15.6 km) from the lunar surface, at the point where powered descent would begin on the actual landing. Practicing this approach orbit would refine knowledge of the lunar gravitational field[14] needed to calibrate the powered descent guidance system[15] to within 1 nautical mile (1.9 km) needed for a landing. Earth-based observations, uncrewed spacecraft, and Apollo 8 had respectively allowed calibration to within 200 nautical miles (370 km), 20 nautical miles (37 km), and 5 nautical miles (9.3 km). Except for this final stretch, the mission was designed to duplicate how a landing would have gone, both in space and for ground control, putting NASA's flight controllers and extensive tracking and control network through a rehearsal.

The ascent stage was loaded with the amount of fuel and oxidizer it would have had remaining if it had lifted off from the surface and reached the altitude at which the Apollo 10 ascent stage fired; this was only about half the total amount required for lift off and rendezvous with the CSM. The mission-loaded LM weighed 30,735 pounds (13,941 kg), compared to 33,278 pounds (15,095 kg) for the Apollo 11 LM which made the first landing.[16] Craig Nelson wrote in his book Rocket Men that NASA took special precaution to ensure Stafford and Cernan would not attempt to make the first landing. Nelson quoted Cernan as saying "A lot of people thought about the kind of people we were: 'Don't give those guys an opportunity to land, 'cause they might!' So the ascent module, the part we lifted off the lunar surface with, was short-fueled. The fuel tanks weren't full. So had we literally tried to land on the Moon, we couldn't have gotten off."[17]

Mission parameters

Mass: CSM 63,648 pounds (28,870 kg); LM 30,735 pounds (13,941 kg)

Earth parking orbit

Perigee: 99.6 nautical miles (184.5 km)
Apogee: 100.0 nautical miles (185.2 km)
Inclination: 32.5°
Period: 88.1 min

Lunar orbit

Perilune: 60.0 nautical miles (111.1 km)
Apolune: 171.0 nautical miles (316.7 km)
Inclination: 1.2°
Period: 2.15 hours

LM–CSM docking

Undocked: May 22, 1969 – 19:00:57 UTC
Redocked: May 23, 1969 – 03:11:02 UTC

LM closest approach to lunar surface

May 22, 1969, 21:29:43 UTC

On May 22, 1969 at 20:35:02 UTC, a 27.4 second LM descent propulsion system burn inserted the LM into a descent orbit of 60.9 by 8.5 nautical miles (112.8 by 15.7 km) so that the resulting lowest point in the orbit occurred about 15° from lunar landing site 2 (the Apollo 11 landing site). The lowest measured point in the trajectory was 47,400 feet (14.4 km) above the lunar surface at 21:29:43 UTC.[18]

Shortly after trans-lunar injection, Young performed the transposition, docking, and extraction maneuver, separating the command and service module (CSM) from the S-IVB stage, turning around, and docking its nose to the top of the lunar module (LM), before separating from the S-IVB. Apollo 10 was the first mission to carry a color television camera inside the spacecraft, and made the first live color TV transmissions from space.

After reaching lunar orbit three days later, Young remained in the command module (CM) Charlie Brown while Stafford and Cernan entered the LM Snoopy and flew it separately. The LM crew performed the descent orbit insertion maneuver by firing their descent engine, and tested their craft's landing radar as they approached the 50,000-foot (15,000-meter) altitude where the subsequent Apollo 11 mission would begin powered descent to actually land on the Moon. They surveyed the future Apollo 11 landing site in the Sea of Tranquility, then jettisoned the descent stage and fired the engine of the ascent stage to return to Charlie Brown Command Module. The descent stage was left in orbit, but eventually crashed onto the lunar surface because of the Moon's non-uniform gravitational field. Its location is unknown as it was not tracked.

During descent stage separation, the lunar module began to roll unexpectedly because the crew accidentally duplicated commands into the flight computer which took the LM out of abort mode, the correct configuration for this maneuver.[19] The live network broadcasts caught Cernan and Stafford uttering several expletives before regaining control of the LM. Decades later, Cernan said he observed the horizon spinning eight times over, indicating eight rolls of the spacecraft under ascent engine power. Recordings from the flight do not support this dramatic memory.[20] While the incident was downplayed by NASA, the roll was just several revolutions from being unrecoverable, which would have resulted in the LM crashing into the lunar surface.[19]

After Stafford and Cernan docked with Charlie Brown and re-entered it, Snoopy's ascent stage was sent on a trajectory past the Moon into a heliocentric orbit[14][21] by firing its engine to fuel depletion (unlike the subsequent Apollo 11 ascent stage, which was left in lunar orbit to eventually crash; all ascent stages after Apollo 11 were instead intentionally steered into the Moon to obtain readings from seismometers placed on the surface, except for the one on Apollo 13, which did not land but was used as a "life boat" to get the crew back to Earth, and burned up in Earth's atmosphere.)[21]

Snoopy's ascent stage orbit was not tracked after 1969, and its current location is unknown. In 2011, a group of amateur astronomers in the UK started a project to search for it. In 2019, the Royal Astronomical Society announced a possible rediscovery of Snoopy, determining that small Earth-crossing asteroid 2018 AV2 is likely the capsule with "98%" certainty.[22] It is the only once-crewed spacecraft still in outer space without a crew.[23][24]

Splashdown occurred in the Pacific Ocean on May 26, 1969, at 16:52:23 UTC, about 400 nautical miles (740 km) east of American Samoa. The astronauts were recovered by USS Princeton, and subsequently flown to Pago Pago International Airport in Tafuna for a greeting reception, before being flown on a C-141 cargo plane to Honolulu.

After Apollo 10, NASA required astronauts to choose more "dignified" names for their command and lunar modules. This proved unenforceable: Apollo 16 astronauts Young, Mattingly and Duke chose Casper, as in Casper the Friendly Ghost, for their command module name. The idea was to give children a way to identify with the mission by using humor.[25][26]

The Smithsonian has been accountable for the command module Charlie Brown since 1970. The spacecraft was on display in several countries until it was placed on loan to the London Science Museum in 1978.[27] Charlie Brown's service module (SM) was jettisoned just before re-entry and burned up in the Earth's atmosphere.

After translunar injection, the Saturn V's S-IVB third stage was accelerated past Earth escape velocity and became a derelict object where as of 2018, it remains in a heliocentric orbit.[28]

The ascent stage of the Apollo Lunar Module Snoopy was jettisoned into a heliocentric orbit. On June 10, 2019 Nick Howes, a fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, announced that he and his colleagues had located Snoopy, whose location was previously unknown, based on radar astronomy data with 98% certainty.[29]

The shield-shaped emblem for the flight shows a large, three-dimensional Roman numeral X sitting on the Moon's surface, in Stafford's words, "to show that we had left our mark." Although it did not land on the Moon, the prominence of the number represents the significant contributions the mission made to the Apollo program. A CSM circles the Moon as an LM ascent stage flies up from its low pass over the lunar surface with its engine firing. The Earth is visible in the background. On the mission patch, a wide, light blue border carries the word APOLLO at the top and the crew names around the bottom. The patch is trimmed in gold. The insignia was designed by Allen Stevens of Rockwell International.[30]

In February 2016 Discovery Channel broadcast a TV show suggesting that the mission witnessed mysterious or alien signals while on the far side of the Moon.[31] The astronomers mention the odd whistling sound that lasted nearly an hour. It was speculated that this is an evidence for UFO coverup. According to space journalist James Oberg, the sound was most probably radio interference between the command module and the lunar module landing vehicles. Describing it as "outer-space type music" was most probably due to priming, as suggested by Benjamin Radford.[32]

Bibliography

Cernan, Gene; Davis, Donald A (2000). The Last Man on the Moon. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 368. ISBN 978-0312263515.
Chaikin, Andrew (2007). A Man on the Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts. Foreword by Tom Hanks. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-311235-8.
Glenday, Craig, ed. (2010). Guinness World Records 2010. New York: Bantam Books. ISBN 0-553-59337-4.
Lattimer, Dick (1985). All We Did Was Fly to the Moon. History-alive series. 1. Foreword by James A. Michener (1st ed.). Alachua, FL: Whispering Eagle Press. ISBN 0-9611228-0-3.
Nelson, Craig (2009). Rocket Men: The Epic Story of the First Men on the Moon. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-02103-1.
Slayton, Donald K. "Deke"; Cassutt, Michael (1994). Deke! U.S. Manned Space: From Mercury to the Shuttle (1st ed.). New York: Forge. ISBN 0-312-85503-6.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Apollo 10.
"Apollo 10" at Encyclopedia Astronautica
NSSDC Master Catalog at NASA
[1] Apollo 10 Flight Journal

NASA reports

Apollo 10 Press Kit (PDF), NASA, Release No. 69-68, May 7, 1969 (from NASA Program History Office)
Apollo 10 Press Kit (PDF), NASA, Release No. 69-68, May 7, 1969 (from NASA Technical Reports Server)
The Apollo Spacecraft: A Chronology NASA, NASA SP-4009
"Apollo Program Summary Report" (PDF), NASA, JSC-09423, April 1975
"Table 2-38. Apollo 10 Characteristics" from NASA Historical Data Book: Volume III: Programs and Projects 1969–1978 by Linda Neuman Ezell, NASA History Series (1988)

Multimedia

Apollo 10: "To Sort Out the Unknowns" Official NASA/JSC documentary film, JSC-519 (1969)
Apollo 10 16mm onboard film part 1, part 2 raw footage taken from Apollo 10
Apollo 10 Moon Orbit Orbital footage of Moon from Apollo 10

Morpheus wrote:Vidya asked, "Morpheus, I presume if you go into the tunnel of light you 'reincarnate' at the other end? What if you stay in spirit? Does this mean you don't reincarnate, or that it is postponed. Can you choose to reincarnate from spirit, without this 'tunnel of light and its gatekeeper? (how? if it's possible)..just a simple question today then."

Sorry for my absence as a stomach bug has played hell with me. Sure took the wind out of my sails.

When you go thru the tunnel of light, you will arrive somewhere. A station perhaps where those that are manning it are just another program. Maybe one of possessing your soul. The tunnel of light is a wormhole. Granted it is a different type and they probably have all kinds of types to fit the needs of the soul they are trying to possess. If you submit, you're done!

Ask yourself if you are the commander of your own ship? If you are, when you pass over, you'll know better not to fall for a program that has been there for eons. Part of waking up is the state of being that goes with that. You have the gift of free agency at that time, at that moment, and if you're wise, you will know what to do next.

For everyone, it will be different because some are commanders and some aren't. Every path is different. For instance, when I got into the 11:11 stuff, I found myself in a different type of tunnel. The tunnel was like a loose spiral staircase. It was flexible. On one end of the tunnel was an exit doorway. A soul group was in this tunnel, getting ready to exit. I knew the soul in my personal life that was leading the way. I was last, bringing up the rear. The funny part was that I did not know anyone else from my personal life in this group, but I knew we were all connected.

Be your own commander! Don't leave it to someone else, where you are just taking their word for it even though they may appear as an Angel. I mean, after all, all the work you spend to get to the bottom of your truth and at the best possible moment to acquire your spiritual freedom, you are going to leave it to someone or something else is not the way that got you to your waking state.

It comes down to choice. For me, I'm not going through that tunnel. I choose to be free! Been there done that as far as being in space. I can go anywhere. Besides, as in my case the programmers on the other side of that tunnel, left because they knew I had figured out what they were about. So command your own space. You want to go back to Heaven, then just think it. Why do you need a wormhole to get there? Doesn't make sense to me. If you are a betting man or woman, then place all of your bets on YOURSELF! If you do that, you are guaranteed to win. Why not empower yourself? Please don't leave it to secondhand beliefs to cause you to submit to lies, illusions, and the rest of it. You have come this far, so don't throw it all the way in a second guess. Don't let your soul get gotten by Soul Pirates.

Please forgive me if all this may sound condescending. I am not like that but words have a way of making things seem that way.   I hope you are well, Vidya. Maybe you could reveal to us where you are in my other thread. Maybe gives us some feedback on what you're doing.

No worries OXY! Again thank you for posting like a Thuban, ah, I mean for your long posts.   Seriously, just keep on going on. I appreciate what you do.   I must confess I don't have a really good memory as far as postings go. You would make a really good lawyer. But it would seem if for nothing else, what I posted in the past is consistent even today. So I thank you for digging and finding past postings and posting them here. Especially Brook's postings.

Lionhawk wrote, "On a personal, I wanted to say to ODM that your presence here is much appreciated. Part of your gifts is to be able to get in there and tear it up and dissect. In this research field, that is a priceless gift to have. And just because you say you are not experiencing, I would say otherwise as you are always pushing the envelope to another "place of knowing." So maybe you might feel downtrodden by all this research and all these agendas that surround us. We have all been there several times at least. I also can't stress this enough is to never give up. Many have and those that have, now have a bitter outlook on this world and that only means they reflect that from within. That's not a healthy spiritual approach as proven by what illnesses befall on these people. So don't stop with what your flow is. When you do, things go awry. You are a major contributor with your postings and it is with wishes we all could use some ODM mojo with our research projects. Some do. Many don't. How many times have I heard the question, what would ODM think about this? You set a great example."

That hasn't changed! And here we are Brother.  

orthodoxymoron wrote:

Thank-you Morpheus. I don't have much to say at this point. Namaste.

Vidya Moksha wrote: I stripped both my ambulances back to the shell. I prefer a blank canvas to refit.. I reused as much as possible but I took it all out, removed the inner aluminium shell and layered insulation...i also think so much metal will be a pain with condensation... i refitted with wood.

Morpheus wrote:Couldn't agree with you more Vidya as far as starting off with a clean slate. After watching the Project Amber vids and what he has gone through, I can easily see why you would strip down a Sprinter Ambulance. Starting fresh. It's also a lot of work. So I can imagine what you have gone through. Do you have a finished photo of the inside of your rig? Insulating just sucks.

I went out yesterday morning and did get the box a/c up and running. Apparently it is running off the alternator. I think the alternator is 150 amps. Not sure though. When you hit the master switch on for the box, the engine gets bumped up to a fast idle speed of 1500 rpms. The bad thing about that is, it creates a lot of diesel smoke. Literally, smoke you out. Most a/c units at best can only compensate for a 20 to 25 degree difference cooling variance. This thing is an animal. The thermostat goes down into the 50s and what I have researched, has a 40-degree variance. Plus it can cool down the box like within 12 minutes as compared to 40-60 minutes in most RVs. Impressive to say the least.

The darn thing even has airbags in the box. That was a surprise. Plus it has a Medi-Cool box. Must have been for Meds. It has temperature contol too. I also found where there is an antenna access panel on the ceiling next to that front window. Might be able to route the solar cables through that instead of going through the window access.

Make no mistake folks, these type of projects require a lot of courage to even attempt. So many unknowns, especially without any wiring schematics. I didn't even get a manual for this thing.  

Here's a better shot of that front window & where I am going to put the wood stove. Where it says, do not tamper, is where one of the air bag sensors is located.

orthodoxymoron wrote:You guys got it all wrong!! I'm gonna get an older less-expensive Cadillac CTS-V Wagon, put a luxurious bed in the back, and seduce beautiful-women at Burger King!! "Hey Baby!! Wanna Squeeze My Buns??!!"

"Oh Oxy!!"



The End.

Morpheus wrote:The Wes Penre Papers The Third Level of Learning: copyright: 2013 Wes Penre Productions 1st Edition 178

https://wespenrepapershome.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/thirdleveloflearning.pdf
page 177

Lionhawk wrote:

Greetings Abrax, An impressive thread you got going on here. What I like about it, is that it isn't strictly a work of a lazy mind with the copy and paste method. You also seem overly accommodating. Not saying that is bad. But to say it mildly I am slightly confused here as to why at this date and time, the council you are affiliated with has decided to put this information out there. Since I am now in the den of a Dragon, with a Dragon, with what seems to be of a great heart, I would also like to ask why this is such a familiar place to me? It would seem like I have been in several of these dens and although my memory goes way back, it would also seem this is like business as usual. If I know anything about Dragons, it is the swapping of the stories that rarely occur between a Dragon and a human. And yet here you are swapping many stories to many a human. Mind you, I haven't come here to disrupt or interrupt your thread here with any malice intent. But forgive my curiosity. In all of my memories, there are many that include Dragons, since the time of Antiquity. Most of those memories are horrific ones. Why the Creator allowed his creations to devour another creation has never been really answered for me since those times. I watched humans get sliced and diced by the very claws of your kind. When I say your kind, I mean your kind as in your soul family in Creation. The very family that exists among us today.

But if I do anything today, in this post, is set something straight that really hasn't been discussed. Not many are even aware of the ramifications of this in this painting, as they may have only read about it, possibly. They have no experience to go by as a reference to even understand such knowledge unless it is conveyed to them as dark or light. A Dragon is a Dragon. A Human is a Human. The soul fragments of each have a different matrix. Both are the Creator's creations. Both have had the same kind of road less travel as they both have also degenerated through the ages. There is a time where these two had to be completely separated from each other in the Universe. To the extreme that one was placed in this Universal polarity and the other was placed in it's Universal opposite polarity. For that matter, I don't think this has been written anywhere here on the Planet as it is not privy information. The reason why this was decided was to actually ensure the prospect of soul growth in some sort of progression. The Dragons were on the other side of this Galaxy in the other polarity. A great King was appointed and is still ruling today. Well, since the Dragons were separated from man, they had no one else to slice and dice, so they started slicing and dicing themselves. Factions broke off from the Kingdom and wanted their own Kingdom as it is the quest for power that will drive a Dragon mad. Kind of like giving booze to a Native American.

The great King Dragon tried for eons to turn this plight around. But these factions that joined together as one, refuted against the King. So, it was decided that something had to be done, as these Dragons thirst for power, was killing this great kingdom. They were an uncontrollable menace. So they were gathered up and exiled through the center of our galaxy through the Black hole. Some know the rest of the story. The Orion war and so forth to this day in the now. I have a speculation. I speculate that this council of yours is seeking favor with the humans at this time because of what is about to happen. You guys have a problem. And right now you are desperate because you know that your end is near. You think your soul group here will be possibly saved if in thinking that you can convince someone to see that you are worthy of saving by now trying to embrace the human faction. Like you are now doing us all a great big favor. Let me put this in Black and White instead of Light and Dark. The fact is that your faction of the Dragons were exiled or banished from where you came from. No matter how your council tires to disguise it. And since that time, some of you tried to go back but couldn't. In other words, you saw the light as to what your King was saying, but you already had chosen your fate. It is the original sin that the dark chose to refute the Creator's wishes for all of his creations. Except for this time your council and brethren repeated the same mistake with your King.

So, to now appear in this date and time as such glorious beings are not going to change the original sin that your kind has perpetrated. And since that time of banishment, look at the karma, your soul group as now compiled. Imagine a pile of dragon dung that can fill up several sectors in this Universe. With all of your brilliance and accomplishments that only served to satisfy your thirst for power, you have created your own black hole and it has been fed by the very energy you have fed it. And despite all the crimes against every outpost you have conquered in the quest for that power, you have more or less put the noose around your own necks. Your council's decision to not fully take responsibility by placing another agenda at the foot of the human race is like getting the switchman ready to pull the switch on your noose floor.You seemed to be a young Dragon by Dragon standards and well schooled. It is a shame because some of you have seen the light, but so many of your brethren have not, and you have become well out numbered by your own kind because you chose to see the light as to where they still refuse it. You, yourself might find the Creators grace when all this is said and done. There is a chance for you to save your brethren and one chance only. That chance has to do with your true King. It will not be achieved by your council or any other faction that has separated itself from your soul group that is currently here.

I also know your brethren have a watchful eye on what you are doing here. They have no use for us human folk. Their eyes only show contempt for us to the extreme. Like that final look before the kill. To make matters worse, in a matter of speaking, if your council and brethren decide to finally negotiate for your soul family's survival, a human has been appointed to assist in that process. The reason for that was to really test your resolve as to your true intentions. There is no more room for the scheming. It is no longer about your entitlement attitude and power. It is about your soul survival, period. So I leave with this with you in hopes that you all make sense of this and know that it isn't all as you have so far put it. You left out some crucial things or maybe your own council kept it from you. Also if that wasn't enough information for you to be motivated in any direction you choose, I have two more things of intrigue that might get your attention. One, the technology you have been seeking that was once here, that your kind had control of because you stole it in the first place, is no longer in your possession as you know. Also, any persons that you are possibly trying to find that may lead you back to that technology are also not within your council's reach. So you are wasting your time. Tell that to your superiors. So, I hope our encounter was an interesting one for you, my Dragon friend. Notice I didn't complicate it with all the dragon dribble. It's complicated enough. And sure you can have me checked out if you like. I would advise that anyway. Spirit Matthew told me that my name is how the Universe knows me. He is a wise soul. Namaste'

Abraxas:

Dear Lionhawk! Some humans are getting ready to transform into Dragons; a very few are on the brink of doing so (1 in 50,000). Most humans are not ready for Dragonhood; yet requiring evolvement and preparations. According to your words of personal wisdom above, you are one of the latter humans -not yet ready for Dragonhood. Should you search in your caves of your remembrances, then you might find some clues as to where the ancestors of the Dragons come from.This should then allow you to revise the histories as you have learned them from second-hand sources. Shalom! AA

TRANCOSO wrote: So, what about the content of Lionhawk's post?

Abraxas: Dear Trancoso! The PTB are RULED by the Dragon archetype. The PTB are unable to access more than 95% of the Cosmic History. As Collier says, the Paa Taal (or similar label) have been forgotten in the records as the ancestors of all. Those ancestors are rather closely entwined with the concept of the starhumanity as the fourth 'brain halo' evolving from the Reptilian brainstem, the mammalian midbrain, and the human cortex. This agenda allows recircularization of the linearity in the Orb of the Ouroborus (Milky Way Mazzaroth or Circle of the Zodiac). The content of Lionhawk's reply contains no direct questions to be answered and was answered relative to the consciousness vibrations emitted through the wordings. It is in my authority to discern written material within the context and under the guidance of the Thuban master templar -the universal Logos. In this capacity and authority, I choose if and how to reply to unsubstantiated innuendo and preconceived ideas and bias with respect to the History of the Dragons and as found in the archives on Thuban. As most can ascertain, I DO answer direct questions in all cases, except in oversight or when these questions are intended to cause strife and dissonance or are what is labeled as ad hominem. AA

Malletzky wrote:

What a powerful concept this is! May I assume that we're not only supposed to not only find the way back home to the creator but more than this, that we're primarily supposed to 'learn' the creation itself while finding the way back??? If so...it really does matters to find out that 'going back home'...or the 'second coming'...must happen from inside-out and not visa versa! With respect, Malletzky

AA; You are BOTH, a shard of the creator and shard of the creation simultaneously malletzky. And you seem to have understood one of the 'hidden data' (the 5% the PTB have not yet discerned relative to their data base) rather well. The symbolism of the Eucharist is THE MOST POTENT archetype for the human-starhuman transformation. It's the real thing and is being 'synthesized' by the PTB in 'implants' and such things. It is inside-out and not outside-in. The Cosmic Archetypology RULES the Cosmos. The reconfiguration of Gaia so requires reconfiguration of the entire cosmic structure. This has been the agenda of all, PTB and ETs all along. Not many know the details, but many have hints and indicators as to what those details entail -especially the echelons at the top of the PTB pyramid. AA

Lionhawk wrote:

Well, well, my dear Dragon. Nice try. Brushing it off your back with a brush called arrogance. To be expected in the first round between us. For that matter, I think you have one hell of a sense of humor and you might consider the comedy circuit because when I read your response, you made me laugh and I can only hope that my laugh wasn't an annoying echo in your den.

Dragon-hood. Now that is by definition a confusing concept. A definition that could very well be projected by whatever gang is giving out such information related to their agenda. It even sounds like something akin to a degree. Ph.D. comes to mind as to your delivery. Also, the agenda of transforming humans into Dragons surely tells me that you are desperate. I must inform you that I have to take away a point by your response and let you know the number stands at 96% instead of 95%. With 4 percentage points left. For one thing, from everything in my experience is not as you have tried to paint it. I thought Dragons had courage. You must be a young Dragon and have not fully found that courage that should be beating in your Heart. No matter the dragon dribble that you have displayed in your response, I will allow you the grace for your immaturity. The point of my addressing you is that you have lured many with your wisdom. Even I am impressed with your talents. But not enough to compromise what the Creator has already blessed me with as a human as in higher universal man. Why would I defile his intentions by allowing what he has already blessed me with as one of his creations into something he did not intend. And you are doing what? Uncreating one in 50,000 into something that has forgotten what it was blessed with in the first place? That is just one of the most perverted perversions of the Universe I have heard in a while.

The premise of that is actually very twisted in design and just shows at what lengths your soul family has gone to exploit one of God's creations. But really, why would I be surprised at this twisted twist as I have seen with my own eyes what your soul family has done. If you are really paying attention here, I said that and from the first hand as to what I brought to the table. There are several key components that your brethren and your council no longer have control of. One of which I didn't mention in the first round, are the keys to that gate that some of you tried with all of your might to go through but turned you into Dragon butter instead. Another thing that is not in your cave of awareness is who or what is keeping that gate shut. And not to upset you but I will tell you that it is from the true source that has made this contract to keep you all here until you embrace what you have refuted. I have no such agenda as in duping anyone as to what I have brought here today. If anything I have spent countless years in service, since the time of Antiquity and those caves as memories as you so poorly put that is all in one cave. One lifestream. If everyone could remember in full, what they have experienced in their lifestreams, I fear there would be a massive war of retribution reborn in this Universe for all the pain and suffering your soul family has provided them. And through the years of torment and suffering, I have endured, I have come far in the healing of the prejudice your soul family has graced me with. To the point where, I have come here in actual peace to try to negotiate a peace, spite your arrogance.

I didn't come here to complicate your day Abrax. I came here with a solution to all concerned. As usual, the display of your response is no longer a speculation, as your arrogance has surely shown part of your claws. You claim you have authority but that authority is misdirected as to what your agenda is all about is nothing but another form of possession. You and your council no longer have the authority as you have so claimed with your arrogance and entitlement attitudes over this Planet any longer. This Planet was never yours to begin with. It has all been a ruse perpetrated by your quest for domination. In the name of the human race, your agenda will not succeed should you decide to implement the invasion that your council has been covertly stockpiling here on Gaia. Your council doesn't tell you everything. You can keep us distracted with your wisdom, but if the question as to who knows anything that could possibly know of that, well let us see if you are truly full of wisdom or something else. Now that is what I call an innuendo. And if I have to stand up and represent this Planet that your soul family has exploited, to claim the authority to denounce your council's agenda, then I so do so now. I will not sit here and have any more of my soul family sacrificed to your dinner plates. Your brethren have used us from the very beginning and you are going to present your council in such a sweet light without first taking the responsibility to come here and set things right even though your guilt could fill a black hole. Your council does not or is not the true Royalty of the Dragons that I am friends with.

So you have no real authority here in this Universe. You never had. You only have fooled the fools. Nothing more. You see there are guardians appointed by the God of this Universe with the Creator's blessings. That only report to the one. No council rules or governs over them. So there is no infiltration. The only reason why your soul family has made it this far is because of the Creator's grace. If I didn't know from experience these things, I would probably be subscribing to your second-hand information. Your talent is blazing and I sincerely mean that. But for the sake of my fellow humans, I want them to know that their souls are being played for by an old agenda that is now passed its time. And I don't want to see them sacrificed for nothing as that has always been the end result of that agenda I have spoken about. I don't want to see my soul family continue down this road called, "Boring" because of the selfish issues that have consumed your family for eons. What you also don't get is that I also don't want to see your family end up as Dragon butter either as I also know the potential of your family as the Creator had intended is still available to you through his grace. We humans are not responsible for the karmic pile your brethren have created. So that is why it is time for you or one of your superiors to come clean and take responsibility and convince your brethren that the road you continue to travel on is a DEAD end. Was that an innuendo? Because if you do I will tell you this, is that your Brethren will find yourselves all alone and will do through the habit of your past, repeat it, but this time you will be slicing and dicing each other.

The reason why you will be left alone is because of what is going to happen in the Universe. You simply won't be able to keep up in terms of frequency. And to further add to your situation and what appears your lack of knowledge pertaining to it, is what you once had is now gone. The real ones. What you think you have is not what it appears to be. So without that, your fate is once again sealed. Mind you, I am not here to judge you. You hold your own mirror. But everyone should have a clue as to what you have withheld from your audience. There is a code between Dragons and Humans, but it is not this code. This Thuban code is not the Royal one. So it has no real authority anywhere outside of your home planet. I'll have to pass on your proposed course of Dragonhood. I don't have the stomach to digest a child served up on a plate. If I can propose a question, I would like to ask when are you going to tell the real truth to your human audience? I am not saying that you have lied. But what I am talking about is what you haven't told them? This reminds me of the movie, "TO SERVE MAN." Again Abrax, I came in peace and I am going to leave in one piece. Why? Because I can. I also bid you a good day my Dragon friend. Sincerely. Lionhawk aka ....................?

LionHawk wrote more:

Greetings.When I first posted up on this thread, I had no idea that this thread had bothered many here. But apparently, I wasn't the only one where those flags went up. Now I have stated that Abrax here as done an amazing and blazing amount of work that is way impressive. I'm not taking that away from him. I wish there were more people who would write their own original work with some substance than a lot of the dodo that gets copied and pasted up. I am more interested in experiences from those I know instead of someone I don't know. All I ask is that you do it with integrity. Otherwise, I can just turn on the TV and get some manure type of story, saving your time and mine. You know..............you can't help but see some of the responses with your name on it. And for the sake of the Mods, and to be as respectful as I can be, what I will say is that some of those responses are only from lack of awareness and or experiences. If we all had the same experiences and the same awareness, there would be nothing to give us a separate character. What remains here is that I am who I am and you are who you are. Some of us have been warriors. Some have not. It all depends on what stations you chose for soul growth. You also can tell who is a warrior and who is not. I am not the only warrior here. Then again, I also know my way out of a barn. I could say that not only am I hacking at evil but I would rather not be hacking at the manure being pooped out by someone who had a hissy fit and left and only came back when I left. Now that I have returned, hacking at evil, as I was accused of, I find the same cow pooping again. Hilarious really.

Also just a distraction from what is really going on here. Now to walk in a Dragon's Den is a little different than a barn. At least in a barn, you know that manure management is usually in the stalls. But in a Dragon's Den, your guess is as good as mine. And mind you Abrax that this analogy that came from someone's conscience and not mine. Someone also tried the group lynch mob scenario technique as to imply we all felt the same way about this thread. I have only one question for that person. How many barbecues have you been too? I think everyone has their own feelings here. Everyone should be able to express what that is. You don't have to like it. But it should be respected as long as it is tactfully done. I say that because what I have seen demonstrated took courage to do and it was done straight up. Even if I don't agree with what was expressed or even if I do, is not the point here. Someone showed a lot of true grit and character by voicing what was bothering this person and this person was at least honest about that. I can work with that any day of the week as compared to others doing the backstabbing or pooping in your way. At least I know where I stand in either case. That showed heart to do that. Now back to the issues at hand. I asked what needed to be asked. At least the question that no one else here did ask. They at least now know the chicken is out of the bag and someone did ask the question. The question that they never did want you to ask. Think on that. Here's another deal for you. Do you know why some or a lot of this doesn't make sense for you? Because it is from their paradigm and not yours.

It's almost like going to China and not knowing the language, the customs and traditions, and here you are trying to bridge all that with some Chinese person who doesn't speak good English. Same analogy but the same kind of results. All these different Arch types are also vying for position in the now. What I now have determined is that one shoe doesn't fit all. And most of them are trying to define you in their shoe box. When you are not in their shoe box, to begin with. That is also why my valid questions that I posed were not answered. Also as to why the question of AKA was so far off the mark with the answer that was presented. Why, because he doesn't know who I am and doesn't have access to that by using the channels that are available to him. There must be a reason. So what is it going to be? Ascension or Dragonhood? And why would anyone in their right mind choose to go from an Oxygen-based life form to a Hydrogen based life form? Why move into a lower density element? Why deny yourself the process of creation that the Creator had already intended for you in the first place? To compromise that process by being exposed to a belief system that will not be sustainable within the future of this Universe? Do you think the grass is greener over there? These same beings who were banished here and you are going to go kiss their butts, after all, they have done to our human soul family. And the innuendo that I am coming from a hateful mind. What? I got to say that again. What? Excuse me! I came here to this thread to establish a truce and an answer to all parties involved.

I didn't come here to start a war. I am trying to avoid one. While Abrax is here dazzling you with his brilliance, maneuvers are taking place right now, right under your noses, and someone wants to make stupid comments about how disturbed he is by me showing back up. What? That doesn't even compare to what is being played behind the scenes and if you think researching it online, makes you a complete researcher, we are all going to be doomed with that kind of mindset. I also don't care what anyone thinks of me. I didn't come here to be popular. I'm not running for office. I don't take my orders from anyone on this Planet. I am here as many of you are to assist in the ascension of Gaia. That is my agenda. I am also sorry that the many who are trying to learn to think everybody is doing the same thing they are doing. You always learn but some of us have graduated and that is hard for most to understand or even accept. They think we should be like them staying in school. For some of us school is like over with and you have to go finally walk the walk instead of talking the talk. Experience is getting out of that chair and putting what you know in some form of action. If you stay in the chair too long, you will be conditioned to just reacting. Kind of like sitting in front of a theater screen watching a movie. Another thing I want to point out is that it would seem we are the prize. All the agendas I have seen point to that. So it is my position at this time to see where this Dragon goes as if you know the basics, an agenda is at work here. By what numbers I have seen, he has a tough job ahead as far as the recruitment process. The number ratios indicate that.

And I am a supporter of free speech and no rules as none are needed when things are approached with honor and respect for others. Alex Collier mentions a new place of knowing. Establish one. You want to do it in this thread, then you might want to ask for the credentials first. Which was skipped in my mind? So don't go blaming other people for your feelings when you didn't take any responsibility to ask those basic questions in the first place. If you can't get verification from this council and at least have an introductory meeting to establish your Dragonhood club, then consider what you haven't been considering. My apologies Dragon. You left me not much of a choice here, but I understand why. I bid you another great day and I hope there are no feathers in your chicken dinner. (Innuendo) that was the name of the chicken. And I guess all of my questions have been answered by not what was answered.

Lionhawk leaves the den.

AA: The Thuban Council does not set any stage for anyone. The Thuban Council is exactly what it claims to be -the emissary or messenger from the Logos, the Universal Logos of the Christian scriptures. The Thuban Council functions under the auspices of the 24 Elders, archetyped in the Book of Revelation. Noone is required to accept or believe this in any form or manner. The 24 Elders are the Thuban Dragons, who receive their authority from the 4 Beasts and through them from Prime Source or God.

(The following is a sarcastic reply to Lionhawk's input. However, how much is she actually telling the truth here? Just something to ponder. Wes's comment.) Abraxas: Ok; I'll decide. Thuban is a pretend smokescreen of pretend information, which is just plagiarism of well credentialled academic sources masquerading as 'real science' of a new world. The Thubanese are old Draconians who like to eat people for breakfast and to gather food resources; the Thubanese have decided to infiltrate the world's most important discussion forum: Project Avalon. Here then the agenda is to brainwash the forum contributors with scientific-sounding but really worthless information and for the purpose to gain as many followers of the Thubanese philosophy as possible. Then when the critical mass of cult followers has been reached, the true Draconian Reptoids will appear and harvest their brainwashed followers. This will be accomplished in invading the old earth shortly after December 21st, 2012 through a Black Hole-White Holemonadic dyad opening up halfway between Sirius and Gaia and wormhole connected to the Orion star system. The Powers-That-Be of the old earth will be powerless to stop the US; because they had thought that WE would allow them to be our ambassadors of the new earth and in thinking of themselves as the elite.

We shall eat them for lunch, but they don't know that yet; although some of them suspect that WE are deceiving them. And so WE shall rule the New Earth and in a few years, say 2015, WE shall reengineer the deteriorated wormhole channels to allow our Draconian brothers and sisters to join US on OUR new home planet SERPENTINA. From then on, SERPENTINA will be a BLACK DRAGONSTAR. All of the old humanity will have been consumed by the US and WE shall DRAGONSEED a hybrid race between OURSELVES and OUR Ancestral Lineages. But first of all, WE have to create the Thuban Dragon Cult and this and only this is the purpose of Abraxas. So Be It! Signed and Sealed in the Name or Amen of the Master-Templar by Abraxasinas Scribe of the Dragons aka the SolarArrowed Unicorn of the SeaGoatian Dragon horns entwined with the Hermetic FisherEagle of the Lunar Twins. AA

orthodoxymoron wrote:Morpheus, thank-you for the above post. This sort of thing is the major reason I participate in this website. It's a road less travelled for me which I feel extremely uncomfortable about participating in, yet somehow its a research-project which seems to require the attention of appropriate researchers. I'm including that post in my United State of the Solar System thread, but I'll delete it if you want me to. I'm too tired to analyze it presently, but I will later today. I try to provide a potpourri of perspectives on my threads, regardless of whether I approve of them or not.

Morpheus wrote:I went through a great majority of these posts and did some editing just to make it for an easier read. If you want me to break it up better with more paragraphs, just say the word. The reason for posting all this up today is that I have been working on this in the last month and wanted to update the progress so far. Not only that but I also got a true friend involved. Meet Kate.

Kate and I met 15 years ago. Online, yes, but not on a forum. We hit it off right from the start. We had a lot in common and yet different. Come to find out, we had history. A colorful one, but very negative. She and I spent many years fighting and killing each other.

It was during the Orion Wars where the battles took place. Keep in mind, that war lasted around 700,000 years and never did end with a clear victor. She was a Draconian Commander. We laugh now, but it wasn't funny business back in the days. We would often find ourselves blowing each other up with our Starships. Our hate for each other was off the charts. We sought each other out to repeat our death dance. I can still see her standing on her bridge. She was very intimidating and she didn't hesitate her mind when it came to killing. She was very proficient at it. She was tall, strong, and Reptilian.

Anyways, somewhere down the line, she decided to change sides and decided to go human. That is a very complicated process to go through and it takes years. You're placed under probation during that whole time until you can prove yourself worthy. She was released from that probation a few years ago. Talk about a long, long process.

Of course, she and I forgave each other. All that being said, I had her take a look at the Thuban thread. What came out of that which included the exchange in my previous post, is that I was spot on in that exchange. As to events, etc. She was able to validate with her gifts, talents, contacts, and memory, the context and the historical timeline associated with all of it. All that from an ex Reptilian. Made my day of course as someone outside of myself decided to prove it out. I couldn't ask for anything more.

It wasn't very long after this exchange I had with the Thubans that I was attacked. Also, scans revealed the attack was dispatched from Alpha Draconis. Not only the scans, but my contacts also knew where it originated from. The attack was an intended kill shot. I barely survived it and still to this day, suffer from pain from that attack. 24/7 as a matter of fact. The attack occurred on March 7, 2010. It was around that time that many others were also being attacked. The reason for the attack was that I was exposing the truth and they wanted me to be snuffed out because it threw a major wrench in their agenda.

I was hit with a beam weapon. It entered my right knee and went through and then went through my left leg above the ankle. The energy would then work upward back up the body as the energy increased from the ground.

The Thubans denied the attack. I believe them. They were assigned with the task of delivering their agenda to Earth. They, themselves are not their military. But they are IMO, a storefront of sorts.

Kate did some work on Susan's 13th bridge. We both did. Session wise. What we found was that the 13th bridge does exist but it turns out to be an illusion for those who have the ability to go into the 13th dimension. It's like a mirage and all you have to do is pass through knowing it is a mirage. I will say that this is very high-level stuff as what it represents is not very well known to begin with. We're talking about going into the 13th dimension and using the 13th dimension to jump into the Logos. A new place or space of knowing!

Some dimensions actually have some sort of membrane that separates them from a nearby dimension. Not all. If you do any space travel or dimensional travel, you can sometimes feel that membrane. Sometimes, its like breaking the sound barrier. I have heard the explosion that is heard going through them. All you have to do is increase your Merkaba frequency to cancel those effects out. Getting back to the 13th-dimensional bridge, what you will see is a wall of gold and white shimmering light, streaming up and down, as you look at it from the POV of the 12th dimension. I think the term bridge, in this instance, is actually a metaphor.

Please don't get me wrong here as I am not an expert on Dimensions. I am only sharing my own insights based on what I have experienced and trying to the best that I can to relate my findings, with my own filters of understanding.

Maybe this Logos is not new, to begin with. Maybe it is new because it was recently discovered. Maybe the Thubans and the rest of these dragons have made some really good steps forward and are now experiencing their new discovery as in a new place of knowing. This would show promise and growth in awareness.

In the near future, I am going to venture into the 13th dimension. I have been there once when I visited Sol. When I was in the 12th looking at this mirage before me, I felt no problems as far as passing through it if I chose. Maybe that is because I have been there once already. I'm not exactly sure. But when I do, I will report back here.

We can't get stuck on the numbering of these dimensions. Where you are left with the impression, the higher you go in the number, the better things are. Case and point is the 11th dimension, where it is similar in the sense of the 4th dimension. A lower and a higher level within the dimension. The 11th dimension has some dark qualities about it in one of those levels within it.

A mirage? That's what Kate and I concluded. Yet maybe the 13th bridge is a real bridge for the Dragons and that is what they will need to transition from the here to there.

In the clip below......What I saw was similar to the wall of fire in the clip except it had more of a Northern light effect where there were bands flowing straight up and down. Better yet streams. With the golden and white hues. I think this clip is very parallel to what we experienced with the Thubans.

And I had my differences with the Thubans just like many did. Another one of those differences is that they used Jesus to launch some of their beliefs. Dragons getting religion????????? I don't think so! Just another way to hijack your mind. Just another way to hijack Jesus.

When Brook and I moved into our house here in North Carolina, 2010, we had created some projects. One of those projects was to build some kind of wooden single-shelf system. Like a big "U" shaped table. Well, we found some rough maple boards and I was working on them in our driveway, milling them to shape. We had taken a break and decided to go to this swap meet on Rt. 321. We stopped at this one stand and bought 2 swords. Broad swords. The guy tells us if we buy them he would throw something in to sweeten the pot. The below picture is what he gave us. I accepted the transaction. I knew I had to get this ceramic artifact away from this guy because I knew it had cursed him and his family. We went home and I took this artifact and did my thing to neutralize it. Destroyed it in the driveway. There was more to it than that as I had to do a ritual to neutralize it. Anyways, I did what I had to do and I didn't need to be told to do this as I felt it was of my soul's duty to do this, without a question. Unconditionally. Well.... we got a visitor that night. Brook met with him. Freaked her out. He just wanted to thank us for what we did. He also commented to Brook about the carpentry project that I was doing in the driveway. I don't remember now his exact words were but it was in the context of total understanding and a smile on his face.

orthodoxymoron wrote:Morpheus, a lot of crucifixes (if not all of them) seem to symbolize the 'Defeat of Christ' rather than the 'Victory of Christ' and I often wonder if the Bible and Religion are a mixture of Good and Evil to be Purposely Deceptive?! But then if the Bible and Religion are rejected there are an infinite number of even more deceptive and dangerous replacements. The Thubans might be one of these. I spoke with an 'agent-like' couple at a 'Whole Life Expo' who told me that the potential for humans to become deluded and deceived was very great. I suggested to 'RA' that humanity had been easy to deceive, and he replied "Very Easy." I've spoken to several 'Individuals of Interest' who were low-key yet extremely-smart and two or three of them were amazed at how stupid humans were (especially regarding believing BS). Humanity might be stuck in a 'Deception Game' which might be nearly impossible to break out of. A Supercomputer-Managed Information-War might Utterly-Destroy Humanity as We Know It. I feel as if I'm playing with Burning-Magnesium on this website, but I do it anyway, for better or worse, I know not. Time will tell (as it always does). BTW, I saw what appeared to be a UFO Dogfight at approximately the same time you were attacked in 2010. They appeared to use Directed-Energy Weapons, but what do I know?? 2010 was the year 'RA' contacted me, and I've felt worse and worse since then, with some rather bizarre internet-posting. 'RA' told me "You'll manifest your bad-side." The Horror.

Morpheus wrote:Here's the deal. I spent most of my younger years desperately seeking God and Jesus. I had every reason too. The house I was raised in was demonically possessed and was being haunted by 11 Native Americans who were murdered there. The land was also affected by this. The demon's doorway was the closet in my bedroom. Just to give you an idea where like in the movie, "The Exorcist," where the scene is where the room turns freezing cold. That happened 3 times in that bedroom. With a pot belly wood stove burning in the very next room with the door open to my room. As I said, I had every reason to find God and Jesus. The Catholic Church refused my request for help. I never did find God and Jesus, simply because I was looking in the wrong place. And that place was the bible. The Church did me a big favor by refusing my request. It made me get off that toilet seat and change directions as to finding solutions. Every one of these religious programs wants you to "BELIEVE." You submit to it and all you have done is give away your power. Along with your time, effort, and resources. For what? A lie?

I have done an exorcism. One was enough! The bible has no power. And yet they would have you believe that it does. Even my grammar program wants to have it capitalized. The real power comes from within you. The bible is useless when it comes to these issues. For that matter, you can not find a solution from a book when you are in direct contact with such negative beings. You may as well hit yourself in the head with any book and knock yourself out cold when you are right in the middle of it. You don't know what is happening when it is happening, you don't have enough information to make a proper decision, and it changes within a flash. You end up just reacting to something that is above your pay grade.

And what gets me is when those who believe in Jesus, act as though they know him. When they never met him. Automatic hypocrisy right off the bat.

I'll tell you a little secret OXY. Talking about crucifixes. If you have truly met Jesus, you would know that he did not want to be remembered by the cross. The deep sadness on his face when he said that, said it all. The Darkside has done the exact opposite as to his wishes. With their propaganda and arrogance. And Jesus is not the only one they have done this too.

Namaste'

orthodoxymoron wrote:Morpheus, one dark night I jokingly told 'RA' "I Should Bring My Bible and Start Shouting at You!!" as I shook my finger at him (like a preacher making their point in a sermon)!! 'RA' didn't seem to like that idea!! What's ironic about all of this is that I seem to be reverting to a select minimal-list of key-books from my past, just to have a clearly-defined starting-point and frame of reference. One could chase the latest guru and philosophy for all-eternity without ultimate-resolution (or something to that effect). I'm really trying to shut-up, wash my hands, pack my bags, and leave town (shaking the dust off my shoes). I've had more than enough, and I'm too old, stupid, crazy, sick, and tired to continue. I might just read a couple of theological-books and major-newspapers as I prepare to transition into the 'Great-Hereafter' for more 'Fun and Games' or is it 'Murder and Mayhem'?? Namaste and Godspeed.

Morpheus wrote:And don't forget door number 3.

Just like you, that's what I am doing. Getting out of Dodge.  I have an appointment on Monday, meeting a realtor. Going to get Zeus on the road when my state title gets here. Very soon. Selling everything I can. I was telling my Brother down in Florida that I wanted to simplify my life. Might take me time but I have that now.

The day is coming when I do my drive about. I'm retiring in a real way. I don't have much time left. You know that when you can see the exit door. You now know it is there. But before I go I want to spend time with Gaia. Do some fishing, camping, etc. Might even come to visit you during one of your sermons.


Just one important question remains.......If Mercedes is Europe's automotive bar measurement and Cadilac is the USA equivalent, then why is it that Cadilac doesn't build Vans and Expedition vehicles? Or do they? I know that Ford, GMC, Chevy, and Dodge do.

Like I've said, I have paid my dues in FULL. I just settled Brook's Estate yesterday, which was one journey I do not want to repeat. Everybody is paid and Brook's name is cleared of everything concerning her. When you love somebody, that's what you do. My part is done and I am waiting for a call from my lawyer as to when the Judge signs everything off. I was told this will happen on Monday.

Now it is a matter of releasing all these physical attachments. I can't take it with me so why not do something good with it?

And what do demons do when a priest recites from the bible? They laugh. And the joke is on them! You want to get the attention of a demon, just throw the bible on the ground. He won't be laughing then.

For my Brook.....I was blessed to have her in my soul life.

Be kind to yourself and you will be kind to everyone else. Love the one your with. That's what truly matters.

orthodoxymoron wrote:Morpheus, it sounds as if you have your priorities straight, and that things are coming into focus for living your minimalist-dream. Regarding Cadillac, there's the Escalade (specifically designed for @$$holes). A small and stylish Cadillac motorhome might be cool. I might retire in a Cadillac CTS-V Wagon with a bed in the back, and just travel, stopping at rest-stops, grocery-stores, campgrounds, and Motel 6's. Actually, I'll probably just keep doing what I'm doing until I meet St. Pete. Exorcists probably make Deals with the Devil and work as a team!! 'RA' told me that people get possessed when they read 'Hostage to the Devil' by Malachi Martin!! Honest. The only sermons I preach are when I swear at Astral-Spies and flip them off!! I'm NOT kidding!!

Carol wrote:Oxy, Epstein take down is orchestrated by the President's military team. No worry. Trumps mission is to expose the pedophiles, end the human sex slave trafficking and clean out the swamp in DC. His team is orchestrating how this is to be done and so far doing a good job when it comes to arresting pedophiles and rescuing kidnapped children sold into the Satanic sex slave industry.

These 2 videos take a devoted amount of time and mental gymnastics to get all the codes and what has been hidden from us for so long. If you didn't catch part one of this chemtrail related expose, please first go to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1NTuKKants
The Spell Against America Is Broken

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAlqbqKgmCg
#SerialBrain2 - Winning: Trump now controls the chemtrails! (Pt.2) 47.32

"This one takes a bit of getting through, but the outcome is quite amazing. So, we have been dealing with nephilim all this time! Well, watch as the chemtrails (how about Q Trails) now cleanse the air and water. Are they also protecting us from 5D as has been stated many times. This is a metaphysical battle, on top of all else. We must choose the level of our belief!!"

I also came across this video. I can only imagine what is the contents of the DVDs that fill the safe they confiscated out of his home in Manhattan this weekend it is also well worth watching.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XShjryvBOt4

Then Mr Schumer is entangled.

https://nypost.com/2019/07/10/schumer-got-thousands-in-donations-from-jeffrey-epstein/

Acosta says he was told Jeffrey Epstein beonged to the Intelligence agencies and to leave the deal he made with prosecutors alone.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/49355/acosta-was-told-epstein-belonged-intelligence-ryan-saavedra

This article in the UK Daily Mail gives the full lowdown of Jeffrey Epstein

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3688656/A-fully-equipped-dentist-s-chair-close-photos-young-girls-backsides-eerie-images-videotaped-walk-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-s-Florida-mansion.html

Pedophile Island New Yorker Magazine Article.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/everything-we-know-about-jeffrey-epsteins-private-islands.html

REPORT: Trump Plotted Clinton-Epstein Takedown For Years, Knew About Clinton ISLAND PHOTOS
Jul 13, 2019
By Patrick Howley

"President Donald Trump plotted his takedown of accused child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s elite inner circle during the 2016 election, convening a meeting with then-National Enquirer owner David Pecker prior to Trump’s comment at CPAC 2015 about how Bill Clinton has a Jeffrey Epstein problem.

(article continues)

.....Pecker, he later told me, used to send him articles and issues before they were published so that he and Trump could read them. After the meeting Trump called in Sam Nunberg, then a Trump Organization employee, who saw Pecker leaving Trump’s office. “Michael was sitting in there when I came in, and the issue of the National Enquirer with the pictures of Prince Andrew was on his desk,” Nunberg recalled. “He said not to tell anyone, but that Pecker had just been there and had brought the issue with him. Trump said that Pecker had told him that the pictures of Clinton that Epstein had from his island were worse.'”

Documents released by the FBI pertaining to Clinton-connected pedophile Jeffrey Epstein show that the known child predator had a professional relationship with then-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller.

“Epstein has also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon,” says one of the court documents. “Case agent advised that no federal prosecution will occur in this matter as long as Epstein continues to uphold his agreement with the state of Florida."

from released FBI files:


full story:

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/report-trump-plotted-clinton-epstein-takedown-for-years-knew-about-clinton-island-photos/

orthodoxymoron wrote:Carol, I keep thinking in terms of a Sun-God Parent-Faction with Moon-God Subservient-Factions. Draining the Swamp might involve a couple of Subservient-Factions fighting for power (sort of similar to 'Crips v Bloods'). I also keep thinking about the movie 'JFK' in general, and the David Ferrie rant in particular, regarding how things work (past, present, and future). Decades ago, I asked "Do We Need to Go to Hell to Get to Heaven??" I've been speculating that we live in 'Purgatory Incorporated' which might involve the Illusion of Freedom with Hidden-Rulers. Transitioning to 'Heaven Incorporated' might involve Total-Disclosure, Open-Rulership, and Absolute-Obedience (which the General-Public would almost certainly rebel against with extreme-prejudice, resulting in 'Hell Incorporated'). So really, the Road to Utopia might be a Primrose Path of Purgatory > Hell > Heaven, but when people got tired of following orders, the process might start-over. This might constitute an 'Endless-Loop' for All-Eternity. An Individual of Interest told me "Things Continue to Worsen" and "We Need to Start Over". Both Believers and Unbelievers might be horribly-disillusioned. The Horror.

Carol wrote:"Epstein himself DID NOT come into federal jurisdiction! His plane did. Port Authority boarded his plane and arrested him. Epstein never touched foot on US soil before the arrest. Epstein's plane has the warrant on it! That is why he is willing to put it up as collateral for bail along with his 77 mil NY location (also under seizure related to Trump EO). His lawyers are forcing the jurisdiction subject while knowing he won't get bail.

The lawyer's filing document for bail is not about getting him bail. They are attempting to put the Judge in a box. The Judge kicked the can down the road because he doesn't want to rule on bail.  That is why he raised the 3 day rule for the defendant and sent it to another Judge to hear later.

FOLKS! We have our first Military tribunal about to happen! This case is outside of the civil court system."

Jeffrey Epstein denied bail and ordered back to prison ahead of sex trafficking trial after LYING about his passport and wealth, with new records showing his hidden millions offshore

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7261253/Jeffrey-Epstein-bail-hearing-Pedophile-likely-remain-prison-ahead-sex-trafficking-trial.html

"It's Going To Be Staggering": Epstein Associates Prepare For Worst As Massive Document Dump Imminent
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-17/its-going-be-staggering-epstein-associates-prepare-worst-massive-document-dump

Leaked screenshots of letter the cabal sent a newspaper threatening to sue if they don't cover-up Epstein's associates. (QRV)
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3340155?fbclid=IwAR23YxFQuzLoqnf5lVDAWHWksjA89B5LPPsY9qmyO73MVRx3ghok48EqcpU

Just pulled this off the site.

"Daily Mail defends story linking Israel’s Barak to Epstein Britain’s Daily Mail newspaper defends its decision to publish photos of former prime minister Ehud Barak entering the mansion of disgraced US financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2016. Barak’s lawyers wrote to the Daily Mail on Wednesday demanding that it retract Tuesday’s story and pay “substantial damages to vindicate his reputation and compensate him.” Screenshot of Daily Mail website showing article relating to Ehud Barak, July 16, 2019 But the Mail says it “stands by its recent story concerning Ehud Barak’s relationship with the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein 100 percent… We note that Mr Barak’s assertion that he was not party to Mr Epstein’s illegal activities is a denial of a claim we have never made.”

This guy is no small fish. He's former prime minister of Israel, Ehud Barak.

The crazy thing is that he's suing for BLOOD LIBEL!

The is how Wikipedia defines blood libel.

Blood libel or ritual murder libel (also blood accusation) is an antisemitic canard accusing Jews of murdering Christian children in order to use their blood as part of religious rituals.

Q #3446

!!mG7VJxZNCI 18 Jul 2019 - 1:09:18 PM

https://cdn.qmap.pub/images/956ceee75a2ad585a007e14e677537aa9e6957840cd79d338810324913de9214.jpg

Symbolism will be their downfall.

Q

"FIND OUT THE PEOPLE THAT WENT TO THAT ISLAND." - POTUS https://voat.co/v/QRV/3330307/19701651 This might be that "Oh, SHXT" moment.

orthodoxymoron wrote:Once again, I'm attempting 'Responsible Neutrality', so everyone is sort of friend and enemy simultaneously, especially regarding esoteric topics. I don't know what to think about Jeffrey Daugherty and Robert Stanley, but I think they've done their homework. They know dozens of times more than I do. We seem to wish to follow leaders and jump on bandwagons. I continue to suspect that the Real PTB control ALL Sides (good and bad). I've even been hesitant to jump on the Donald Trump bandwagon, even though I try to be idealistic regarding the Best of America. I try to see things from all perspectives without circling the wagons. I 'enjoy' wallowing in a lot of difficult material, which is quite incapacitating. Also, all the above makes me unpopular with everyone, but I'm not trying to win any popularity contests.

Swanny wrote:If you were 20.000 years old you would hopefully be very wise and would have seen hundreds of religions come and go, why would you think one of the current ones to be true??

If one were attempting to build a civilization, the absolute-truth might be the end of said civilization, and a cover-story might be absolutely-necessary. Who Knows?? How do we really know anything-significant (especially relative to antiquity and the otherworldly) with a significant degree of certainty?? What if this particular civilization requires a Matrix of Conflicting-Delusions to survive and thrive?? What if a Single Religion Consisting of the Absolute-Truth (with zero-tolerance for heresy) might work in Heaven, but NOT in Purgatory and/or Hell (figuratively and/or literally)?? I've constructed a Crazy-Laboratory of Conflicting-Concepts and Scary-Stories in a Science-Fictional Context of Politics and Religion (mostly), and this has seemingly made me the most unpopular soul in the solar-system. Understanding and Exploiting the Matrix of Deception works SO Much Better. Perhaps I'll get it right in my next life (if I even have one). Honesty is the Best Policy Until It Works Better to be Dishonest (without admitting this, of course). Perhaps I should focus on Gardening and Manual-Labor. It might be easier that way.

I once spoke with a bright college-freshman who said they were completely 'lost' regarding life, the universe, and everything. For all they knew "they might be in some giant's stomach'!! I'm sure they were using that as a figure of speech, but I understood their frustration completely. I felt their pain. A couple of years later, at this same college, I overheard a student crying to a Minister that "The Bible is NOT the Word of God!" She was weeping profusely. Decades later, a Harvard Divinity School Graduate spoke with me privately, mockingly referring to "God's Word" as we stood looking at a row of Bibles in a bookcase. As I keep saying, "I Believe, But I Don't Know What I Believe." I'm presently partial to Unorthodox Science-Fictional Biblical-Egyptology as a launching-pad for Religious and Political Science-Fiction. It's probably impossible to adequately describe my amalgamation of faith and doubt. I don't have a 'Monopoly on God' but I understand the dynamics of churches who claim to be the One True Church with the Absolute-Truth and God On Their Side. It's certainly easier to run a religious-organization and collect-tithe with that Fundamental Working Assumption. Epistemology Continued. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/

6. Additional Issues

6.1 Virtue Epistemology

Epistemology, as commonly practiced, focuses on the subject's beliefs. Are they justified? Are they instances of knowledge? When it comes to assessing how the subject herself is doing with regard to the pursuit of truth and the seeking of knowledge, this assessment is carried out by looking at the epistemic quality of her beliefs. According to virtue epistemology, the order of analysis ought to be reversed. We need to begin with the subject herself and assess her epistemic virtues and vices: her "good" and her "bad" ways of forming beliefs. Careful and attentive reasoning would be an example of an epistemic virtue; jumping to conclusions would be an example of an epistemic vice. It is only after we have determined which ways of forming beliefs count as epistemic virtues that we can, as a second step, determine the epistemic quality of particular beliefs. Its proponents construe virtue epistemology more or less stringently. According to pure virtue epistemology, epistemic virtues and vices are sui generis. They cannot be analyzed in terms of more fundamental epistemic or nonepistemic concepts. Proponents of a less stringent approach disagree with this; they would say that epistemic virtues and vices can fruitfully be analyzed by employing other concepts. Indeed, according to an externalist strand of virtue epistemology, it is the very notion of reliability that we should employ to capture the difference between epistemic virtues and vices. Stable ways of forming beliefs are epistemic virtues if and only if they tend to result in true beliefs, epistemic vices if and only if they tend to result in false beliefs. Virtue epistemology, thus conceived, is a form of reliabilism.[64]

6.2 Naturalistic Epistemology

According to an extreme version of naturalistic epistemology, the project of traditional epistemology, pursued in an a priori fashion from the philosopher's armchair, is completely misguided. The "fruits" of such activity are demonstrably false theories such as foundationalism, as well as endless and arcane debates in the attempt to tackle questions to which there are no answers. To bring epistemology on the right path, it must be made a part of the natural sciences and become cognitive psychology. The aim of naturalistic epistemology thus understood is to replace traditional epistemology with an altogether new and redefined project. According to a moderate version of naturalistic epistemology, one primary task of epistemology is to identify how knowledge and justification are anchored in the natural world, just as it is the purpose of physics to explain phenomena like heat and cold, or thunder and lightning in terms of properties of the natural world. The pursuit of this task does not require of its proponents to replace traditional epistemology. Rather, this moderate approach accepts the need for cooperation between traditional conceptual analysis and empirical methods. The former is needed for the purpose of establishing a conceptual link between knowledge and reliability, the latter for figuring out which cognitive processes are reliable and which are not.[65]

6.3 Religious Epistemology

In the history of philosophy, there are several famous arguments for the existence of God: the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the argument from design. From an epistemological point of view, the question is whether such arguments can constitute a rational foundation of faith, or even give us knowledge of God. A further question is whether, if God exists, knowledge of God might not also be possible in other ways, for example, on the basis of perception or perhaps mystical experiences. There is also a famous problem casting doubt on the existence of God: Why, if God is an omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent being, is there evil in the world? Here, the epistemological question is whether, based on this problem, we can know that God (thus conceived) does not exist. Another, central issue for religious epistemology is raised by evidentialism. According to evidentialism, knowledge requires adequate evidence. However, there does not seem to be any adequate evidence of God's existence. Is it possible, then, for theists to endorse evidentialism?[66]

6.4 Moral Epistemology

The basic moral categories are those of right and wrong action. When we do theoretical ethics, we wish to find out what it is that makes a right action right and a wrong action wrong. When we do practical or applied ethics, we attempt to find out which actions are right and which are wrong. The epistemological question these areas of philosophy raise is this: How can we know any of that? Traditionally, philosophers have attempted to answer the questions of ethics via intuition, a priori reasoning, and the consideration of hypothetical cases. Some philosophers who belong to the naturalistic camp consider this approach misguided because they think that it is unreliable and liable to produce results that merely reflect our own cultural and social biases. Among those who think that moral knowledge can be acquired via intuition and a priori reasoning, a primary question is whether the kind of justification such methods can generate is coherentist or foundationalist. Finally, a further important question is whether moral knowledge is at all possible. Knowledge requires truth and thus objective reality. According to anti-realists, there is no objective reality of, and thus no truth about, moral matters. Since what is known must be true, it is not easy to see how, if anti-realism were correct, there could be knowledge of moral matters.[67]

6.5 Social Epistemology

When we conceive of epistemology as including knowledge and justified belief as they are positioned within a particular social and historical context, epistemology becomes social epistemology. How to pursue social epistemology is a matter of controversy. According to some, it is an extension and reorientation of traditional epistemology with the aim of correcting its overly individualistic orientation. According to others, social epistemology ought to amount to a radical departure from traditional epistemology, which they see, like the advocates of radical naturalization, as a futile endeavor. Those who favor the former approach retain the thought that knowledge and justified belief are essentially linked to truth as the goal of our cognitive practices. They hold that there are objective norms of rationality that social epistemologists should aspire to articulate. Those who prefer the more radical approach would reject the existence of objective norms of rationality. Moreover, since many view scientific facts as social constructions, they would deny that the goal of our intellectual and scientific activities is to find facts. Such constructivism, if weak, asserts the epistemological claim that scientific theories are laden with social, cultural, and historical presuppositions and biases; if strong, it asserts the metaphysical claim that truth and reality are themselves socially constructed.[68]

6.5 Feminist Epistemology

When construed in a non-controversial way, the subject matter of feminist epistemology consists of issues having to do with fair and equal access of women to, and their participation in, the institutions and processes through which knowledge is generated and transmitted. Viewed this way, feminist epistemology can be seen as a branch of social epistemology. When we move beyond this initial characterization, what feminist epistemology is will become a matter of controversy. According to some, it includes the project of studying and legitimizing special ways in which only women can acquire knowledge. According to others, feminist epistemology should be understood as aiming at the political goal of opposing and rectifying oppression in general and the oppression of women in particular. At the extreme end, feminist epistemology is closely associated with postmodernism and its radical attack on truth and the notion of objective reality.[69]

Bibliography
Alston, William. 1989. Epistemic Justification. Essays in the Theory of Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
–––. 1991. Perceiving God. The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
–––. 1993. The Reliability of Sense Perception. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
–––. 1999. “Perceptual Knowledge.” In: Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 223–242.
Armstrong, D.M. 1973. Belief, Truth, and Knowledge. Cambrdidge: Cambridge University Press.
Axtell, Guy (ed.). 1997. Knowledge, Belief, and Character. Readings in Virtue Epistemology.. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Audi, Robert. 1993. The Structure of Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
–––. 1997a. Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Conviction in Political Debate. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield
–––. 1997b. Moral Knowledge and Ethical Character. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––. 1998. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
–––. 1999. Moral Knowledge and Ethical Pluralism. In: Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 271–302.
–––. 2000. Religious Committment and Secular Reason. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
–––. 2004. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Boghossian, Paul and Peacocke, Christopher (eds.). 2000. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
–––. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. London: Cambridge University Press.
–––. 1999. “The Dialectic of Foundationalism and Coherentism”. In Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 117–142.
–––. 2001. “Towards a Defense of Empirical Foundationalism”. In DePaul 2001, pp. 21–38.
–––. 2002. Epistemology. Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
–––. 2005. “In Defense of the A Priori”. In Steup and Sosa (eds.) 2005, pp. 98–105.
BonJour, Laurence and Sosa, Ernest. 2003. Epistemic Justification. Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Brady, Michael and Pritchard, Duncan. 2003. Moral and Epistemic Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brewer, Bill. 1999. Perception and Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––. 2005. “Perceptual Experience Has Perceptual Content.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 217–230.
Byrne, Alex. 2005. “Perception and Conceptual Content.” In Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 231–250.
Casullo, Albert. 2003. A Priori Justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chisholm, Roderick. 1982. The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
–––. 1977. Theory of Knowledge, 2nd. ed., Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
–––. 1989. Theory of Knowledge, 3rd. ed., Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, Stewart. 1988. “How to be a Fallibilist.” Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 91–123.
–––. 1999. “Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 57–90.
–––. 2001. “Contextualism Defended: Comments on Richard Feldman's ‘Skeptical Problems, Contextualists Solutions’.” Philosophical Studies, 103(1): 87–98.
–––. 2005. “Contextualism Defended.” In Steup and Sosa (eds.) 2005, pp. 56–62.
Conee, Earl. 2004. “The Truth Connection”. In Conee and Feldman 2004, pp. 242–258.
–––. 2005. “Contextualism Contested”. In Steup and Sosa (eds.) 2005, pp. 47–56.
Conee, Earl and Feldman, Richard. 1985. “Evidentialism.” Philosophical Studies, 48: 15–35.
–––. 2001. “Internalism Defended.” In: Kornblith (ed.) 2001, pp. 231–60. Reprinted in Conee and Feldman 2004, pp. 53–82.
–––. 2004. Evidentialism. Essays in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
David, Marian. 2001. “Truth and the Epistemic Goal.” In: Steup 2001a.
Devitt, Michael. 2005. “There is no A Priori.” In: Steup and Sosa (eds) 2005, pp. 105–115.
DePaul, Michael (ed.). 2001. Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
DeRose, Keith. 1995. “Solving the Skeptical Problem.” The Philosophical Review, 104: 1–52.
–––. 1992. “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52: 913–929.
–––. 1999. “Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense.” In: Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 187.
DeRose, Keith, and Warfield, Ted. 1999. Skepticism. A Contemporary Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devitt, Michael. 2005. “There is No A Priori.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 105–115.
Dretske, Fred. 1970. “Epistemic Operators.” The Journal of Philosophy, 67: 1007–23.
–––. 1971. “Conclusive Reasons.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 49: 1–22.
–––. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Oxford: Blackwell.
–––. 2005. “The Case Against Closure.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 1–26.
Elgin, Catherine. 1996. Considered Judgement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
–––. 2005. “Non-Foundationalist Epistemology: Holism, Coherence, and Tenability.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 156–167.
Engel, Mylan. 1992. “Is Epistemic Luck Compatible With Knowledge?” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 30: 59–75.
–––. 2003. “What's Wrong With Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox.” Erkenntnis, 61: 203–231.
Feldman, Fred. 1986. A Cartesian Introduction to Philosophy. New York: McGraw Hill.
Feldman, Richard. 1988. “Epistemic Obligations,” in Philosophical Perspectives, 2: 235–56.
–––. 1999a. “Methodological Naturalism in Epistemology.” In: Greco 1999.
–––. 1999b. “Contextualism and Skepticism.” Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 91–114.
–––. 2001a. “Voluntary Belief and Epistemic Evaluation.” In: Steup 2001a, pp. 77–92.
–––. 2001b. “Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions.” Philosophical Studies, 103: 61–85.
–––. 2003. Epistemology. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall. Philosophical Studies, 103: 61–85.
–––. 2005. “Justification is Internal.” In Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 270–284.
Fumerton, Richard. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
–––. 2001. “Classical Foundationalism.” In: DePaul 2001, pp. 3–20.
Gettier, Edmund. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis, 23: 121–123. [Independent transcription in HTML available online].
Ginet, Carl. 1975. Knowledge, Perception, and Memory. Dordrecht: Reidel.
–––. 2005. “Infinitism is not the Solution to the Regress Problem.” In: Steup and Sosa (eds.), pp. 140–149.
Goldman, Alvin. 1976. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy, 73: 771–791.
–––. 1979. “What is Justified Belief?” In: Justification and Knowledge, ed. George S. Pappas. Dordrecht: Reidel.
–––. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
–––. 1991. “Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology.” In: Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. (Cambridge: MIT Press.)
–––. 1999a. “Internalism Exposed.” The Journal of Philosophy, 96: 271–293.
–––. 1999b. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greco, John. 1993. “Virtues and Vices of Virtue Epistemology,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 23: 413–433.
–––. 1999. “Agent Reliabilism,” Philosophical Perspectives, 19: 273–96.
–––. 2000. Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
–––. 2005. “Justification is Not Internal,” in Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 257–270.
Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest (eds.). 1999. The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Haack, Susan. 1993. Evidence and Inquiry. Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology.. Oxford: Blackwell.
–––. 2001. “‘The Ethics of Belief’ Reconsidered.” In Steup 2001a, pp. 21–33.
Harman, Gilbert. 1986. Change in View. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hawthorne, John. 2005. “The Case for Closure”. In Steup and Sosa (eds.) 2005, pp. 26–43.
–––. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Huemer, Michael. 2000. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Klein, Peter. 1999. “Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons.” Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 297–332.
–––. 2005. “Infinitism is the Solution to the Regress Problem.” In Steup and Sosa (eds.) 2005, pp. 131–140.
Kornblith, Hilary. 1999. “In Defense of a Naturalized Epistemology.” In: Greco 1999.
–––. 2001. Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Malden (MA): Blackwell. Oxford University Press.
–––. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kvanvig, Jonathan. 1996a. The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
–––. 1996b. Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology. Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lackey, Jennifer. 2003. “A Minimal Expression of Non-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Noûs, 37: 706–723.
Lewis, David. 1996. “Elusive Knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74: 549–567.
Lehrer, Keith. 1990. Theory of Knowledge. Boulder: Westview Press.
Longino, Helen E. “Feminist Epistemology.” In Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 325–353.
Lycan, William G. 1996. “Plantinga and Coherentisms.” In Kvanvig 1996b, pp. 3–24.
Moore, G.E.. 1959. Philosophical Papers. London: Allen and Unwin.
Montmarquet, James. 1993. Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993. Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, John. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.
Pritchard, Duncan. 2004. “Some Recent Work in Epistemology”. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54: 605–613. [Preprint available from the author].
–––. 2005. Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pryor, James. 2000. “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist”, Noûs, 34: 517–49. [Preprint available from the author in PDF].
–––. 2004. “What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?” Philosophical Issues, 15: 349–378. [Preprint available from the author in PDF].
–––. 2005. “There is Immediate Justification.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 181–202.
Quine, W. V. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized.” In: Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia Press, pp. 69–90.
Ryan, Sharon. 2003. “Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief.” Philosophical Studies, 114: 47–79.
Russell, Bruce. 2001 “Epistemic and Moral Duty.” In: Steup (ed.) 2001 a.
–––. 2004. “How to be an Anti-Skeptic and a Noncontextualist.” Erkenntnis, 61: 245–255.
Schiffer, Stephen. 1996. “Contextualist Solutions to Skepticism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96: 317–333.
Schmitt, Frederick (ed.). 1994. Socializing Epistemology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
–––. 1999. “Social Epistemology.” In: Greco and Sosa 1999, chapter 15.
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1963. “Empiricisim and the Philosophy of Mind.” In: Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Shope, Robert K. 1983. The Analysis of Knowing. A Decade of Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sosa, Ernest. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
–––. 1997. “Reflective Knowledge in the Best Circles.” The Journal of Philosophy, 96: 410–30.
–––. 1999a. “Skepticism and the Internal/External Divide.” In: Greco and Sosa (eds.) 1999, pp. 145–157.
–––. 1999b. “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.” Philosophical Perspectives, 13: 141–153.
–––. 2003. “Relevant Alternatives, Contextualism Included.” Philosophical Studies, 119: 3–15.
Steup, Matthias. 1996. An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
–––. 1999. “A Defense of Internalism.” In: Louis P. Pojman (ed.). The Theory of Knowledge. Classical and Contemporary Readings. Belmont: Wadsworth, pp. 373–384.
–––. 2000. “Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology.” Acta Analytica, 15: 25–56. [Preprint available from the author in PDF].
–––, (ed). 2001a. Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
–––. 2001b. “Epistemic Duty, Evidence, and Internality.” In: Steup 2001a.
–––. 2004. “Internalist Reliabilism.” Philosophical Issues, 14: 401–425.
–––. 2005. “Contextualism and Conceptual Disambiguation.” Acta Analytica, 20: 3–15 [Preprint available from the author in PDF].
Steup, Matthias and Sosa, Ernest (eds). 2005. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Malden (MA): Blackwell.
Stine, Gail. 1976. “Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure.” Philosophical Studies, 29: 249–61.
Stroud, Barry. 1984. The Significance of Skepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Swain, Marshall. 1981. Reasons and Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Van Cleve, James. 1985. “Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Beliefs,” Monist, 68: 90–104.
–––. 2005. “Why Coherence Is Not Enough: A Defense of Moderate Foundationalism.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 168–180.
Williams, Michael. 1999a. Groundless Belief. Pinceton: Princeton University Press (first published 1977).
–––. 1999b.“Skepticism.” In: Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 35–69. 2005, pp. 202–216.
–––. 2005. “Doing Without Immediate Justification.” In: Steup and Sosa 2005, pp. 202–216.
Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry Into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
–––. 1999. “What is Knowledge?” In: Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 92–116.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1999. Epistemology of Religion. In: Greco and Sosa 1999, pp. 303–324.

Other Internet Resources
•Epistemology Page, maintained by Keith De Rose (Yale University).
•The Epistemology Research Guide, maintained by Keith Korcz (University of Lousiana/Lafayette).
•"Direct Warrant Realism", an online manuscript, by Keith De Rose (Yale University).

Related Entries

contextualism, epistemic | epistemic closure principle | epistemology: naturalized | epistemology: social | epistemology: virtue | feminist (interventions): epistemology and philosophy of science | justification, epistemic: coherentist theories of | justification, epistemic: foundationalist theories of | justification, epistemic: internalist vs. externalist conceptions of | knowledge: analysis of | knowledge: by acquaintance vs. description | memory: epistemological problems of | perception: epistemological problems of | perception: the problem of | religion: epistemology of | self-knowledge

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Earl Conee for his help, both philosophical and editorial. The editors would like to thank Michael Beaton and Harry McCauley for suggesting improvements to the wording of some of the above sentences.

Copyright 2005 by Matthias Steup <steup@purdue.edu>

magamud wrote:Really good post Ortho my compliments.  

"What is the Absolute Legal Standard for This Solar System?"

Gods wisdom on goodness.  This is constant but depending on how strong lucifers light is, the tangibility loses its integrity.  Its like the Devil's bubble is going to burst.  He can only go so far.  So we are at a time during his death throws.

"Does Might Make Right?"

No not at all, but how does a parent take care of its children?  So in how we individuate from our parents physically.  We do the same consciously to the world.

"Should I fight the good fight -- or should I just go along to get along??"

This depends on your boundaries of self, that only you can make.  Your identity.  Once you have your membrane you can know where and what is neutral space.

"Are the Teachings of Jesus too idealistic for this Sick Solar System?"

Not at all.  Its a perfect straight line that connects the dots.  This memory is in everyone, in your innate being.  I can tell you that.

"Am I from somewhere else??"

It does not matter as you are from the creator.  Same idea as soul and incarnations.  The creator is the idea of goodness, wholesomeness oneness.  Everything extends from it.  I would compare it to where we are in the galaxy.  On the tip of one of those octopus limbs trying to get back to the center or head of it.

"Enough Theology, Oxy!! We've Got Reservations at the Ritz-Carlton!!"