Anonymous behind the scenes analysis.
The USD will always be one dollar at the local level. Due to the fact that the USA imports across all products and sectors (food, water, stuff, etc), the prices of all goods will rise as the exchange rate between most currencies become more valuable than the USD (which is air bubbles being "deflated")and we eventually hope for this landscape to level sets.
On March 15th feds will announce if a rate hike is happening. Today European Central Bank (ECB), led by Mario Draghi, has announced negative interest rates even more negative, and whether to expand the eurozone version of Quantitative Easing (QE). If Feds raise rates march 15th - expect a SHIFT IN THE EXCHANGE RATES FOR CURRENCIES TO FOLLOW SHORTLY AND MARKET TURMOIL SHALL FOLLOW. INFLATION OF IMPORTED GOODS WILL HIT US AT THAT TIME.
This is a potential scenario to be mapped out.
1. on the current path being presented in the lame stream news and from the epoch-times - William Middlekoop article posted yesterday?
a. we will not move to asset backed JUST YET
b. USD devalues w/a capped inflation of goods. need to watch for APRIL 19th Shanghai Sold Exchange (SGE) to force the reprice of metals (have posted this article/info numerous times)
c. Once the force repriced of metals happens - it will rise and eventually gold will then be added to the SDR basket with 13 other currencies (Bloomberg interview with Jing Ulrich of JPM Asian division has confirmed this last week)
d. USD could be isolated due to lack of cooperation by the dark controllers. No matter China is moving forward w/the ancient Silk Road Trade Route.
e. PER JIM WILLIE USA IS NOW GOING TO LEASE GOLD FROM ASIA. FROM THE W-MIDDLEKOOP ARTICLE HE VALIDATES THAT CHINA HAS TAKEN POSSESSION OF JPM GOLD VAULTS (which we all knew but public confirmation is good) ACROSS FROM THE FEDS & RETAINS OWNERSHIP ONSITE. (meaning assets cant go missing!)
f. SDR (Special Drawing Rights) model has appeared to shift from a one world currency to a basket of 13 (at this stage to level set the global playing field). The SDR will allow the world to eventually trade with a gold back note - letter of credit.
This is the best scenario offered. God bless us all
They are ALL BLOODLINES just fighting it out at the top of the pyramid. White and dark exists at the top. That is the battle. Not the sheeple. The world resources are being RE-positioned for control under different bloodline families. That's the reality we are all facing ....no matter if we like it or not!
We pop the champagne cork to quickly.....lets celebrate...yea! We won ...we won....really? -- what signs do you see we have won and the system is coming down?
The backing of metals with the SDR will NOT ALLOW hyper inflatio nto set in ....it will level set globally all countries. Hence why China has come out under the peace & prosperity as their tag line. China has never placed sanctions or marched against any nations. its commerce with all - return to the Silk Road this shift is going to be difficult as robotics kick in. CONSOLIDATION is what is happening with these mega corps in the economy, further merger & acquisitions as well as, stock buy backs. this is the realism of now -- not whats is being "purposely planted" in the dinar communities.
Richard Dolan’s latest book, UFOs for the 21st Century Mind, lays out the big questions and describes why bringing these questions into everyday conversation and life is critical. We have recommended this book in our “Best Books for 2016” section. One of the most important unanswered questions is whether or not our current economy is open or closed. Are we conducting trade with extra-planetary civilizations?
Can we maintain our sovereignty in the face of their technology? Are we reverse engineering extraterrestrial technology? Are extraterrestrial beings permitted to own property on Earth or to invest in our real estate, commodities, stocks, and bonds?
Are we paying them interest and dividends?
The most important point to understand about such questions is that, regardless of the position you take on our economy
(whether it is open or closed) that position is based on an assumption. If you believe that our economy is closed and that we are trading solely with humans in an Earth-based, closed system (in line with the official reality), you cannot prove that this is true. Conversely, anyone who takes the opposite position – that we have an open economy and are engaged in economic activity with extraplanetary civilizations – cannot prove their position either.
Both positions are based on assumptions and conjecture.
I don’t like betting the ranch on assumptions and conjecture. But if I must do so, I like to make those assumptions explicit. This is more than a philosophical point.
Almost all commentary on the financial markets today is based on the assumption that our economy is closed. However that assumption is never made transparent. It is never discussed. At the same time, trillions in financial transactions go unexplained, from the black budget to $8.5 trillion missing from the United States government.Thus, the assumptions regarding the closed economy commentary are wearing thin.
This is important because a great many people have lost money by assuming that the economy was going to collapse. As part of their investment scenarios, these people assumed that our resources were limited to those on Earth and that our available technology was publicly acknowledged. In fact, we now know this is not true. Indeed, I believe that the manipulation of technology transfers into the everyday economy is critical to maintaining the slow burn and to preventing or controlling financial collapse.
What if our economy is open? Or, if it turns out to be closed, what if the technology available – or that which is operating in secret – is much more powerful than we know? One of the reasons why it is important to ask these questions is that our economy appears to behave more like an open economy.
Our dependency on legacy technology could be explained, as Dr. Farrell has postulated, by treaty requirements. The immaturity of our adoption of new technology could be explained by the fact that it is transferred from another, more advanced civilization. We may be like cavemen playing with laser guns. Collapse, quite possibly, has not come because we have income, technology and capital flows coming in from off-planet.
It is worth playing out a scenario design in which you assume that the economy is open. If this is the case, who owns the outstanding debt? Debt is clearly a back door tool of control for someone.
If we have space weapons, were they created to control Earth or were they created to protect Earth from others who want to collect on their dividends and interest? If private companies have been authorized by the Space Act of 2015 to own materials they mine in space, is this merely a cover story for interplanetary trade?
Is the War on Terror about a much more complex population control plan than we have ever imagined? Does the bombing of underground facilities in the Middle East relate, as some have claimed, to “exopolitics?”
It is time to make explicit our assumptions about the global economy – whether we believe it is open or closed – and to address the numerous bizarre phenomena with which we are dealing. If someone has the power to re-engineer the economy in radical ways, including maintaining a slow burn for decades, then we need to know how this is implemented. We require a logical explanation for these questions. Adult fairy tales, shrieking and fear porn may satisfy our anger or grief for short periods of time. But they are not going to help us get to the bottom of what is happening.
Truth is the door we must pass through if we seek real change.
Risk Issues
There are numerous risks issues involved in the exploration of outer space.
First, major exploration can bankrupt a society. The Darien Scheme essentially bankrupted Scotland in 1700 after it invested heavily to establish a colony in what is now Panama. In addition, while military aerospace applications have proved highly profitable, it is worth noting that, to date, the returns on civilian applications have not been wonderful:
Second, exploration invites skepticism and schisms. Note the rejections overcome by Christopher Columbus.
“The committee judged the promises and offers of this mission to be impossible, vain, and worthy of rejection: that (it) was not proper to favor an affair that rested on such weak foundations and which appeared uncertain and impossible...” —Talavera Commission, 1491, turning down Christopher Columbus’ proposal for finding a new trade route to the Indies. Queen Isabella of Spain later funded the project.
Third, aggressive infrastructure projects, especially when there is a large gap in technological prowess between populations, have historically been associated with slave labor.
This is one of the reasons why I have consistently asked whether mass migrations of immigrant populations are actually providing a labor force for underground bases.
Fourth, when we explore the unknown, we can bring back forces ranging from microbes to technologies which are potentially harmful to our health or to the environment…or we may invite contact with civilizations who do not wish us well. Hollywood has certainly worked overtime to warn us of these possibilities.
My vote is that our greatest risk is spiritual and cultural – the failure to face reality together – whether on this planet or as we move into outer space. Following that, our greatest risk is to bet the ranch on one planet. The risks of not colonizing other planets are greater than the risks we face in doing so.
What does this mean to me?
It’s Time to Assert an Ownership Interest
No matter where you live, you have made a significant personal investment in space.
First, if your country has a space program, which more and more countries do, you have funded space programs with your taxes. If you live in a developed nation, you have financed classified black budgets and private funding through your taxes, lost retirement savings and personal loss of time, health and well-being. If you live in an emerging or frontier market, you have experienced the same through exploitation of natural resources, exploitive labor practices and pumps and dumps of financial markets. All of this has happened through a myriad of harvesting mechanisms, including losses from housing bubbles, market manipulations, fraud and bailouts, narcotics trafficking and organized crime, nuclear fallout and testing of bio warfare and mind control on humans.
The managers of the black budget may not have assigned you a personal locker in one of their underground bases or an ownership share of a spaceship. Nevertheless, I consider you an investor in a vast array of infrastructure, advanced technology and invisible weaponry.
When and if your government tells you that there is no money and that it must cut your retirement benefits, please be advised that you are well within your legal rights to insist on 1) equity certificates and royalties in the technology and companies you have funded.
This is more than a theoretical nicety.
Following the 2016 elections, we are likely to see a more radical re-engineering of the federal budget and US national, state and local pension funds. The demands of the black budget have been one of the holdups in addressing the re-engineering of the federal budget before now. You have a big investment in space, whether you know it or not. With this much money at stake, you may want to pay attention to what is happening with your investment and to how it may impact your other assets.
Global 2.0 to 3.0: Reinvestment drives the New Economy
The financial coup d’etat began with the re-balancing of the global economy in the mid-1990’s and ended with the bailouts and central bank QE-engineered shift of an estimated $40 trillion out of the industrial economy (Global 2.0) and into reinvestment in the networked economy (Global 3.0).
When this much money moves into a sector, it has a profound impact on all areas of income, employment and asset valuations. This is particularly true as new technology is spun off and integrated into related sectors. Indeed, why is the technology sector leading the stock markets?
The leading US coal companies experienced a 77 to 95 percent drop in their stock prices in 2015. Since May 31, 2008, Peabody Energy (a leading coal company) has fallen by 90 percent and Netflix has risen by 941 percent. This is what happens as new technology shifts from Global 2.0 to Global 3.0 and transfers income, employment and asset values, thereby creating highly divergent patterns in the economy.
Our economy is not collapsing – it is being re-engineered. The portion of our economy attributable to outer space is growing and the related shift of technology into many sectors of the economy is accelerating change throughout individual lives and communities. As this happens, portions of the industrial economy are, indeed, collapsing or “being collapsed.”