tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

    A penny for your input

    Spregovori
    Spregovori

    Posts : 74
    Join date : 2010-04-09

    A penny for your input Empty A penny for your input

    Post  Spregovori Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:25 am


    I made a short summary of information from various sources i came in contact with. To a rather large extent my attention went to how this different sources of information combine. How to put it all together. It was an interesting observation to see, for example, one book saying what the other did but in different terms and examples. It was also a sort of a "pleasure" to be able to recognize that. So this is based on many different things in hope it might become a next step in my understanding and perhaps also for someone else. It is of course not all encompassing. It is meant to be as a sort of a foundation.

    Your input on the matter is welcomed. The information are many but the understanding is not always there.

    P.S.

    You might notice i played around a little... If it is too much of a "distraction" do let me know and i will remove it. Also if there are parts of unreadable text just select that part with your mouse to see it.








    of Love


    Conscience as a living thought (thought that thinks) in a light-geometry-vibration-particle-energy-cell manifestation (holographic body).
    Body as a biological computer - growing, responding, thinking (7 mind centers), communicating...of which brain is to be a storage unit...a portable library that we can not access in full due to low vibration.

    Vibration depending on the dimension (the hologram) of consciousness.

    Light as a binding force of all that is and thought as a creating force of all that is.

    Love = light (often used in abuse) and knowledge. Love as something that binds together and expands. So love as you and me and your neighbor and all that is.

    All creation is equal (all=all, no exclusions). For all creation is thought-light manifestation and all creation is love. Love is creation - all that is.
    You allow love to be, the allowance of others to be as they are, patience for others as they are. One does not "do" love but allows it to be.

    Patience not to be confused with tolerance-resentment (example - ok ok...you go and do that, but i just hate it...)

    Love as acceptance. You do not "warrior" what you dislike out of existence. Do not fight against something..if anything...be pro to the opposite (do not be anti war, be pro peace)
    Acceptance of yourself and others.
    To accept is not to condition in any way or have expectations or a need to control the actions or output...etc

    To refuse the acceptance is to hurt. That is no longer love, it is fear. Love does not hurt. Love is creation, denying is to deny yourself....is to deny light. Denying light is to cut yourself further and further from the source (you get sick, you age faster, you have mental disorders...)

    Fear is not the opposite of love as love has no opposite. There is no such thing as non-creation. Everything that is, is a creation.

    Fear is a "mental distortion". It is a whisperer in the head. The one that always sneaks up on your thoughts and starts making "suggestions". Suggestions as of how something will not work, how this and that will go wrong, how doing it will hurt you, how you should do it to be safe and secure....etc Whisperer is also very insecure. Thinking or doing something that represents change and is different, new....not as what it does and thinks...that is a big no no for it. The ego some call it or distorted/altered ego. (whisperer:"bah what? you have lack of confidence due to your 3rd chakra being closed? are you insane? get some Prozac and on with the more important business of survival and safety")

    So love is not something you do by buying flowers, saying it all the time, writing poems, having sexual relations, intimate relations, proclaiming it on radio...etc It is also not to be demanded, expected, proven, wanted...etc
    It might be that the above could use some other term.

    I say sexuality and intimacy since intimacy can encompass sexuality and more than just that (for example - most consider what happens when they go to the toilet to be intimate...etc)

    Love is also not exclusive... it is not love to say you have it for one or few individuals but not for the rest.

    Love is. It is here. You are here. Accept it, allow it.




    A penny for your input Meditation%201






    of Sexuality


    Understanding sexuality is a lot like considering your next shopping experience. Meaning there is this beginning thrill that ends after some "use" and than you have to go and buy something new. Gives some temporary comfort and happiness...but not to you...it gives that tot the above mentioned whisperer.

    What also tends to be the problem is the daily mind-wash about it. Part of the mind-wash is what people in general term to be "love" and how they connect it to the sexuality.

    The question that arises is...should sexuality even be tied to what love actually is to be?

    On the most basic level the male and female can indeed create. They make love by "making love" (having sex). They are utilizing sexual energy of creation. Strong energy.
    Thus sexuality is not to be approached with the selfish intent.

    Male sexual organ is primarily in the red mind center (more physical). The female is primarily in orange mind center (more emotional). Both are part of the lower self...the playful child...the base mind centers which have a very important connections - 2nd mind center which is connected to higher self 5th mind center - creativity connected with creativity of expression = process of creation (thought-word-manifestation)...and 1st mind center as entry point of lowers self connected with 7th as entry point of higher self...and 3rd mind center as a meeting point - if the base mind centers are not working properly (are blocked) the dysfunctions comes to be (emotional trauma and ignorant/distorted mind, illness of organs encompassed )...etc Or in other words...the lack of connection with the source, with the light, with love.

    The word "lower"in this case is just that - lower. It has no malevolent meaning. Like negative in electricity is - negative.
    The unpleasant sensation one might get reading word "lower, negative" is due to a whisperer...due to programming.

    So i will state that love is connected with sexuality but sexuality itself is not love...sexuality is not a "must" for love to be experienced and allowed, accepted....
    Sexuality is a choice.
    Your choice of with who, why, when, what, where...

    It is advisable not to experience sexuality if there is a selfish intent involved or if the person does not understand what sexuality is. The more you give, the more you stimulate and the more you receive as (if) the other does the same....giving energy increases it, taking it...leaves you tired and empty since it is an exchange of energies..as a hologram...it is a frequency or an electro-magnetic exchange. That is why if forced and/or pressured upon to make sexual contact can disturb the person so much.

    Sexuality as creation mostly depends on intent. Your intent is extremely important as it "defines" your focus. Focus might be hard to endure as it requires stillness of mind and the stillness of mind has many "preliminary requirements". So for many it is not something you just go and do....

    Energy of sexuality is strong. Very strong. Just look around you...(a commercial with a muscular man with a new model of some car and those women just having that "hungry" look for him...and many other in a lot of cases much more direct examples)

    Sexual orgasm is a powerful energy..a glimpse of what can be when "tuned in"....energy follows intention...so dedicate/intent your orgasm to someone/something.

    What wonders the mind is what all can be counted as a dysfunction of lower self. Once can make a quick guess and state that sexual obsession (mostly visible in males but also females) can be one of those things. Mostly that can be done via pornographic industry - meat level. Other things can also be neglecting/refusing sexuality, manipulative and obsessed behavior patterns, lack of self worth and energy....

    One can also wonder about "specifics" such as different sexual practices (with who and how for example) and what can be considered as dysfunction. Given all the bombardment of the topic it can be rather hard to discern on this. The power of the whisperer can also be tremendous... What i personally am noticing is for example a more and more "opened culture" when it comes to sexuality...it is even propagated via the corporate media...and when someone has either a doubt (sadly mostly in form of violence and aggression) that someone is labeled intolerant (it is also a nice example of separating people and creating confusion). Modern sociology studies can be very....modern. And than there are, not so modern, anthropology studies such as those of Sambians. I shall deliberately censor myself and not go into specifics at this time since i do not wish to upset any feelings and there is also the whisperer i mentioned before. Also the term "modern" might be modern if you count in what we call "time". Without time many things might be simply considered to be "recent" or on grand scale o things just a "blink of an eye".

    Also simply stating that one feels what is "right/wrong" thing to do can be tricky. It might be best if consideration is based on energy (as mentioned above).

    So in conclusion it can be stated that the topic of sexuality is far from being unimportant and should not be ignored and swept under the carpet for the sake of some morals and alike.









    of Focus


    Let us start here with the basic - u get the experience of what you think which confirms your thinking.

    As many of you are from PA1 community which was originally based on hand books and ground crew idea i assume most of you have the understanding of what in the books is termed as "law of attraction, deliberate intent and allowance" (all three forming balance).

    It is said - state what you wish to experience (it is my intention to experience....) and you will experience it...IF....if you keep your focus on it.
    3D is a slow motion. Compared to higher D where thought can be instantaneous (imagine the horror of thought being instantaneous here..or amm...do not imagine that...at least...not too much).

    I INTEND...this and that....

    So if i focus 3-6 times a day on..."how could it be if would it be..." for 10 minutes (30-60 minutes a day) and i spent the rest of cca 23hours doing/thinking/focusing on some other things....what will i manifest?
    Most likely what my whisperer tells me to.

    So my question to you is...can and do you keep your focus, how do you keep your focus and what do you focus on?

    Also if a big enough community would have some common focus...can you see how powerful would that be and why some might not like that?







    A penny for your input Bigstock_Hamster_Wheel_Runner_2984542

    EDIT: miss spelling


    Last edited by Spregovori on Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:15 am; edited 5 times in total
    dominic777
    dominic777

    Posts : 326
    Join date : 2010-05-09

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  dominic777 Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:29 am

    Spregovori wrote:

    I made a short summary of information from various sources i came in contact with. To a rather large extent my attention went to how this different sources of information combine. How to put it all together. It was an interesting observation to see, for example, one book saying what the other did but in different terms and examples. It was also a sort of a "pleasure" to be able to recognize that. So this is based on many different things in hope it might become a next step in my understanding and perhaps also for someone else. It is of course not all encompassing. It is meant to be as a sort of a foundation.

    Your input on the matter is welcomed. The information are many but the understanding is not always there.

    P.S.

    You might notice i played around a little... If it is too much of a "distraction" do let me know and i will remove it. Also if there are parts of unreadable text just select that part with your mouse to see it.








    of Love


    Conscience as a living thought (thought that thinks) in a light-geometry-vibration-particle-energy-cell manifestation (holographic body).
    Body as a biological computer - growing, responding, thinking (7 mind centers), communicating...of which brain is to be a storage unit...a portable library that we can not access in full due to low vibration.

    Vibration depending on the dimension (the hologram) of consciousness.

    Light as a binding force of all that is and thought as a creating force of all that is.

    Love = light (often used in abuse) and knowledge. Love as something that binds together and expands. So love as you and me and your neighbor and all that is.

    All creation is equal (all=all, no exclusions). For all creation is thought-light manifestation and all creation is love. Love is creation - all that is.
    You allow love to be, the allowance of others to be as they are, patience for others as they are. One does not "do" love but allows it to be.

    Patience not to be confused with tolerance-resentment (ok ok...you go and do that, but i just hate it...)

    Love as acceptance. You do not "warrior" what you dislike out of existence. Do not fight against something..is anything...be pro to the opposite (do not be anti war, be pro peace)
    Acceptance of yourself and others.
    To accept is not to condition in any way or have expectations or a need to control the actions or output...etc

    To refuse the acceptance is to hurt. That is no longer love, it is fear. Love does not hurt. Love is creation, denying is to deny yourself....is to deny light. Denying light is to cut yourself further and further from the source (you get sick, you age faster, you have mental disorders...)

    Fear is not the opposite of love as love has no opposite. There is no such thing as non-creation. Everything that is, is a creation.

    Fear is a "mental distortion". It is a whisperer in the head. The one that always sneaks up on your thoughts and starts making "suggestions". Suggestions as of how something will not work, how this and that will go wrong, how doing it will hurt you, how you should do it to be safe and secure....etc Whisperer is also very insecure. Thinking or doing something that represents change and is different, new....not as what it does and thinks...that is a big no no for it. The ego some call it or distorted/altered ego. (whisperer:"bah what? you have lack of confidence due to your 3rd chakra being closed? are you insane? get some Prozac and on with the more important business of survival and safety")

    So love is not something you do by buying flowers, saying it all the time, writing poems, having sexual relations, intimate relations, proclaiming it on radio...etc It is also not to be demanded, expected, proven, wanted...etc
    It might be that the above could use some other term.

    I say sexuality and intimacy since intimacy can encompass sexuality and more than just that (for example most consider what happens when they go to the toilet to be intimate...etc)

    Love is also not exclusive...is not love to say you have i for one or few individuals but not for the rest.

    Love is. It is here. You are here. Accept it, allow it.




    A penny for your input Meditation%201






    of Sexuality


    Understanding sexuality is a lot like considering your next shopping experience. Meaning there is this begging thrill that ends after some "use" and than you have to go and buy something new. Gives some temporary comfort and happiness...but not to you...it gives that tot the above mentioned whisperer.

    What also tends to be the problem is the daily mind-wash about it. Part of the mind-wash is what people in general term to be "love" and how they connect it to the sexuality.

    The question that arises is...should sexuality even be tied to what love actually is to be?

    On the most basic level the male and female can indeed create. They make love by "making love" (having sex). They are utilizing sexual energy of creation. Strong energy.
    Thus sexuality is not to be approached with the selfish intent.

    Male sexual organ is primarily in the red mind center (more physical). The female is primarily in orange mind center (more emotional). Both are part of the lower self...the playful child...the base mind centers which have a very important connections - 2nd mind center which is connected to higher self 5th mind center - creativity connected with creativity of expression = process of creation (thought-word-manifestation)...and 1st mind center as entry point of lowers self connected with 7th as entry point of higher self...and 3rd mind center as a meeting point - if the base mind centers are not working properly (are blocked) the dysfunctions comes to be (emotional trauma and ignorant/distorted mind, illness of organs encompassed )...etc Or in other words...the lack of connection with the source, with the light, with love.

    The word "lower"in this case is just that - lower. It has no malevolent meaning. Like negative in electricity is - negative.
    The unpleasant sensation one might get reading word "lower, negative" is due to a whisperer...due to programming.

    So i will state that love is connected with sexuality but sexuality itself is not love...sexuality is not a "must" for love to be experienced and allowed, accepted....
    Sexuality is a choice.
    Your choice of with who, why, when, what, where...

    It is advisable not to experience sexuality if there is a selfish intent involved or if the person does not understand what sexuality is. The more you give, the more you stimulate and the more you receive as (if) the other does the same....giving energy increases it, taking it...leaves you tired and empty since it is an exchange of energies..as a hologram...it is a frequency or an electro-magnetic exchange. That is why if forced and/or pressured upon to make sexual contact can disturb the person so much.

    Sexuality as creation mostly depends on intent. Your intent is extremely important as it "defines" your focus. Focus might be hard to endure as it requires stillness of mind and the stillness of mind has many "preliminary requirements". So for many it is not something you just go and do....

    Energy of sexuality is strong. Very strong. Just look around you...(a commercial with a muscular man with a new model of some car and those women just having that "hungry" look for him...and many other in a lot of cases much more direct examples)

    Sexual orgasm is a powerful energy..a glimpse of what can be when "tuned in"....energy follows intention...so dedicate/intent your orgasm to someone/something.

    What wonders the mind is what all can be counted as a dysfunction of lower self. Once can make a quick guess and state that sexual obsession (mostly visible in males but also females) can be one of those things. Mostly that can be done via pornographic industry - meat level. Other things can also be neglecting/refusing sexuality, manipulative and obsessed behavior patterns, lack of self worth and energy....

    One can also wonder about "specifics" such as different sexual practices (with who and how for example) and what can be considered as dysfunction. Given all the bombardment of the topic it can be rather hard to discern on this. The power of the whisperer can also be tremendous... What i personally am noticing is for example a more and more "opened culture" when it comes to sexuality...it is even propagated via the corporate media...and when someone has either a doubt (sadly mostly in form of violence and aggression) that someone is labeled intolerant (it is also a nice example of separating people and creating confusion). Modern sociology studies can be very....modern. And than there are, not so modern, anthropology studies such as those of Sambians. I shall deliberately censor myself and not go into specifics at this time since i do not wish to upset any feelings and there is also the whisperer i mentioned before. Also the term "modern" might be modern it you count in what we call "time". Without time many things might be simply considered to be "recent" or on grand scale o things just a "blink of an eye".

    Also simply stating that one feels what is "right/wrong" thing to do can be tricky. It might be best if consideration is based on energy (as mentioned above).

    So in conclusion it can be stated that the topic of sexuality is far from being unimportant and should not be ignored and swept under the carpet for the sake of some morals and alike.









    of Focus


    Let us start here with the basic - u get the experience of what you think which confirms your thinking.

    As many of you are from PA1 community which was originally based hand books and ground crew idea i assume most of you have the understanding of what in the books is termed as "law of attraction, deliberate intent and allowance" (all three forming balance).

    It is said - state what you wish to experience (it is my intention to experience....) and you will experience it...IF....if you keep your focus on it.
    3D is a slow motion. Compared to higher D where thought can be instantaneous (imagine the horror of thought being instantaneous here..or amm...do not imagine that...at least...not too much).

    I INTEND...this and that....

    So if i focus 3-6 times a day on..."how could it be if would it be..." for 10 minutes (30-60 minutes a day) and i spent the rest of cca 23hours doing/thinking/focusing on some other things....what will i manifest?
    Most likely what my whisperer tells me to.

    So my question to you is...can and do you keep your focus, how do you keep your focus and what do you focus on?

    Also if a big enough community would have some common focus...can you see how powerful would that be and why some might not like that?







    A penny for your input Bigstock_Hamster_Wheel_Runner_2984542
    wow with a brain like that i will come to your party anytime
    thanks Harp Drink Wine Its da Wave Band Gathering
    Spregovori
    Spregovori

    Posts : 74
    Join date : 2010-04-09

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Spregovori Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:07 am

    dominic777 wrote:
    wow with a brain like that i will come to your party anytime
    thanks Harp Drink Wine Its da Wave Band Gathering


    The brain? Loads and loads of information. Memory in brain is..well even the science says it is holographic (they have theories or you can say that they are "working on it"). Given the "light concept" and the "geometry concept" it should not be surprising. Although science will accept what whisperer will allow them (if you do not count the upper echelons).

    My party....hmm i never "threw" a party...might be interesting to try it sometime...just that, it is possible, most would not consider it to be a "party". There are now many individuals that would come to the party and ask "hey man, where is the party"

    But hey...you are alive...so the party is on...every day, all day...



    Anchor
    Anchor

    Posts : 316
    Join date : 2010-04-11
    Location : Sydney, NSW, Australia

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Anchor Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am

    Spregovori, I really enjoyed reading that "essay" - not much to talk about there from me.
    Spregovori
    Spregovori

    Posts : 74
    Join date : 2010-04-09

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Spregovori Tue Aug 31, 2010 3:41 pm




    So I came across Nassim Haramein. First time it was more than a year ago. It was suggested to me by my coworker. He was telling me there is this guy that says we are living in a black hole and that it might be interesting for me to look at. When i asked my coworker to give some brief explanations i was not exactly convinced that he understood what he was telling me about. So he gave me a link and i could see why is that. Besides of the video being of very poor quality, the audio having a constant "hissing" sound (static) and the pictures on the presentation screen being barely visible (due to a low video quality) the topic itself was not as easy to follow (at least for me) since i did not see much. I could not render geometries in my head and also it was in foreign language. To some this might be strange but most of native or long term English speakers (living in English speaking environment) simply do not get how much of an obstacle this can be.

    I did not see the entire thing the 1st time and barely knew what it was about. I returned to it sometime later with more enthusiasm but still i could not see what he was showing there. The video quality is too low. I was just recently again recommended to go and take a look and i was given the same hardly useful video link. So what i did is...i went and found a DVD quality presentation from the year of 2005 with about an hour of additional video not included in original presentation. My mind was: ok if there is something on to this than i want to find out and i wish/will look for a better quality video. And i found it. Still it demanded a lot of my attention/time and additional googling to "get it". The entire presentation is 5-6 hour long + cca 55min of additional video. This here is only a part of presentation.

    What i usually found on the internet was the ET part and pyramids part and NWO part...but no one went into the basics (it could be that since most saw the bad video quality)...or they just simply ignored it...the basics of how it came to be that the ET connection could be made and people rarely mention the details of his explanation or it could be that i simply do not seem them to.

    My thoughts on this part are that...it goes along with the 1st post i made here and in the presentation when he explains about how he progressed with information and how he found out new things it is "clearly seen" that there was law of attraction at work and that there was his desire or to say "passion" that got him past the whisperer for him to be able to get to this things, connect them, present them and get to to the level of being published as scientific publications. It also goes along the "we are one" as he makes the connection of big and small and puts the "biological link" in between...but that is not part of this post (just are not ET, the pyramids and stone structures, the ark of the covenant, the bible references ..etc) so it is generally safe for those who would get scared by such things.

    http://theresonanceproject.org/

    But if for nothing else...now if i give a video link to someone i can actually answer the question of "what is it about" without making "scary" statements such as - we live in a black hole dude, go and check it out...since for most people whisperer is so strong they will not "check it out" and so this post might also be useful to someone else. You can feel free to link to someone that would usually get distracted with the "crop thingies" and closed the window.

    And since this thread is about basics...here it goes....









    of infinite space in finite boundary


    As a base the fact of all things being polarized (opposite/reversed) due to a spinning, is stated. Everything spins...that includes what we are made of. What science does not know is why things spin. It is stated that things are in endless motion due to them being in non friction environment, but many things that do that (like earth core) are everything but frictionless. Science says things spin due to the "bang". When something fails...go for the "bang".

    Science states universe is expanding....given that and so called law of physics...something must contract in order for universe to expand (every action has an equal opposite reaction). So what is contracting? Science does not know. There was this "bang" and well...the bang.

    One of the past "breakthroughs" of science was also the fact that atom is 99,999% space. A small dot, smaller than a cell. And atom consists of even smaller dots (protons and neutrons) . And those dots consists of even smaller dots (quarks). And those dots...they want to find out using the big "bang" machine (CERN). Since you know...it was a "bang" that did it, or so they say.

    So we have a dot inside a dot that is inside a dot...creation inside (outside) creation inside (outside) creation.....so the "assumption" was made - you have infinite space in finite boundary. Boundary being the dot (space of the atom for example as a field dividing the vacuum). In physics there also is what they call infinitely big and infinitely small and those two things do not agree...so they went into "strings" (vibrations and 26 dimensions as of now if i am not mistaken).
    So you can go the other way...you have a planet and a bigger planet and gigantic stars and solar systems and than there are galaxies and there are galaxy clusters...etc

    The example of infinity: draw a circle and draw an equilateral triangle (all sides of same length) in it. Than due to polarity draw its opposite. You get what is most commonly know as star of David. You have two big triangles and six smaller ones on the "sides". If you add the opposite triangles to the smaller ones...you get...more triangles. After that you repeat the process and add more opposite triangles to the newly formed ones. As you make that you can define a boundary to the triangles. To each individual one and to the group of them. Give it a boundary and you get a dot. Than you can continue to adding triangles...by zooming in (to see) and draw new ones and continue to do that...as long as you want to...there is no limit...you just zoom in....the very big zoom will have very small dots (boundaries) the lesser zoom will have bigger dots. Dots to the infinity but all of them are confined in the original circle you made. You have infinity in the finite boundary.





    A penny for your input 184377

    A penny for your input 184378

    A penny for your input 184379

    A penny for your input 184402










    This "hints" that infinity and finite structure are complementary. Also an "assumption" is made that the "empty space" in atom is actually a field (finite structure/dot) dividing the vacuum.

    What is vacuum of space, little Johnny asks the big scientist. Well Johnny there was a "bang" and actually we do not know and stuff and it is volume of space that is empty, there is no matter in it.

    So the science went and tried to see how much of vacuum is there in 1 cubic centimeter. They did their phd thing and came up with the data (what they call re-normalized data, due to them not taking infinity result as valid)..data that showed that in one cubic centimeter of space the mass of the vacuum is larger than if you would take all know universe and put it into a cubic centimeter of space. Given that result the density of the vacuum can be considered to be infinite and that again raises the question of how to put something that is infinite into finite "structure".

    So given the "assumption" that vacuum is being divided there should be some structure that is dividing it.


    It was suggested, that each vacuum division (boundary) has a geometry of a sphere (dot) all different sphere sizes forming things. But sphere is rather "unstable" as a structure. What holds it together? What is inside of a sphere? It has to be the most stable structure that is in perfect equilibrium in order for it to be observed as the vacuum ("empty")...for it to be infinity...to have an infinite amount of density...all that density..all the geometry vectors would have to collide in equilibrium.

    The opposite of the sphere is tetrahedron (4 equilateral triangles combined in a pyramid). It has smallest volume possible for a structure with equal edges and faces and it is the most stable structure. It is also most fundamental geometric structure found in nature and geometry.






    A penny for your input 184380








    Putting a tetrahedron into a sphere is an old idea seen in the Teotihuacan in Mexico where pyramids are aligned to represent our solar system (including Pluto) and all of that was made some thousands of years ago when people were "primitive". It was all documented by Hugh Harleston Jr who surveyed the site. After many years of his work there he concluded that the mathematics that they used had to do with a tetrahedron inside of a sphere.






    A penny for your input 184381








    Harleston doing his work used the mathematical approach related to Buckminister Fuller (known for geodesic domes i personally like)...related to his isotropic vector matrix (isotropy = uniformity in all directions) which consists of 20 tetrahedrons. Fuller used this matrix to base his concept of the universe having a mathematical geometry blueprint.






    A penny for your input 184383






    To further investigate the structure of the vacuum it was than considered how the tetrahedrons "come together". If the tetrahedrons from the above mentioned matrix are removed the what is left are octahedra. Octahedron consists of equilateral triangles (pyramids) with their square bases sticking together (one opposite to other).






    A penny for your input 184384







    As the matrix was further analyzed several "out of place" down pointing tetrahedrons were spotted in it. Out of place - since it was asymmetry and there should be none, at least, you can not have that in equilibrium (connected to what was mentioned above)






    A penny for your input 184385






    So due to the polarization (as mentioned at the beginning) the reversed matrix was added to it but at first it did not provide a satisfactory result since you could not fit it into a sphere boundary.






    A penny for your input 184386






    To solve this the two matrices were pushed one into the other and rotated to be in polarization to each other and the former "out of place" tetrahedrons perfectly matched with the reversed tetrahedrons with the rest of the octahedra remained as they are. The result of the merger was a cube-octahedron in the middle which is 8 tetrahedrons coming together forming a vector (a line which represents a direction and force) equilibrium - the only geometry in which all vectors come together in equal proportions to generate perfect equilibrium.

    A 2D representation of vector equilibrium is a hexagon. The point is that all vectors are of the same length (equilateral triangles) which means that the edge vectors and vectors to the center are both of the same size. Making a 3D hexagon gives cube-octahedron







    A penny for your input 184387

    A penny for your input 184388








    But still there was asymmetry on the edges of the combined matrices. To solve this problem additional tetrahedrons were added to the edges of combined matrices.






    A penny for your input 184389






    Three tetrahedrons were added to each of eight edges, which gave 24 more tetrahedrons to the previous 40 tetrahedrons (20 from each isotropic vector matrix) together that is 64 tetrahedrons. This gives us vector equilibrium in the middle but also the vector equilibrium on the edge and both can change size in perfect harmonic scale.






    A penny for your input 184390






    The cube-octahedron can be considered as eight tetrahedrons "pointing in" while if you would make a star out of eight tetrahedrons it would make a star with the octahedron in the middle and also it would be "pointing out". Combining eight of this stars with the cube-octahedron you form vector equilibrium. So the star is expending side and the cube is contracting side (this relates to the law 1st law of physics mentioned at the beginning).






    A penny for your input 184391

    A penny for your input 184392







    You can give a boundary to each of the tetrahedrons but for them to actually generate boundary/divide the space (to expand) a rotation would have to be present - spinning. To get to this the Einsteins field equations had to be looked into. Einstein said that the force of an object is applied to the structure of space time by curving it an if you put another object close to it, that object would rotate on that curve around the bigger object.






    A penny for your input 184393






    After Einstens first published the equations they were not solved. The solution was provided by Karl Schwarzschild who simplified the model by assuming that object has no rotation. The result of this solution was a black hole. When Karl was calculating how much gravity something produces he based it on a need to have an infinite potential in the middle. That was not that well accepted at that time and also as you "follow" the Einsteins equations into the center of curved space time, the equation goes towards infinity.

    If you take the matter of the universe and put it into Einsteins field equation, and do some phd things, the result is that universe is too dense for light to escape it = we are in a black hole. So if anything can be divided to infinity (as example near beginning) everything would have infinite density at its center - singularity. Everything can be just a different size black hole. Science does say that there is a black hole in the center of each galaxy. Science also says that information can go (radiate) in and out of black hole.

    Later a new solution to Einsteins equations was given and it allowed spinning. But the solution has a problem. If you apply it on a "galactic scale" the result does not match the observation. It only predicts 4% of what we see "out there". What is missing the science officially terms dark matter and dark energy....and it goes perfectly along with the "bang"....when you do not know it...it was either the "bang" or it is dark energy/matter.
    This "trick" of this solution was that if you would have something spinning at the same rate as the observed object you could see the rotation frequency. This trick was based on the assumption that in a frictionless environment things spin forever.

    What makes the earth spin? It is spinning around the sun due to the solar system that spins. What makes the solar system spin? It spins because of the galaxy that spins. What makes the galaxy spin? It spins because of the galaxy cluster that spins. What makes the galaxy cluster spin? Well...there was this "bang"....
    There was the "bang" you know... and so there are atoms and so the electrons spin around the atoms since the "bang" since they are in frictionless environment. Where the "bang" came from? Well...we are working on it...

    But it is not exactly so. There is more than one atom. Electrons spin close to the speed of light...that generates a field. So if you have more than one atom you have interacting fields...you get friction, collision, gravitational fields acting on each other and all objects would have to be solid but they are not (take the spinning of earths core - a dynamo effect that generates magnetic field around us). Science does not know what made the earth core starting to spin and what keeps it spinning.

    But if you add a "little something" (a torque - rotation of an object around its axis) to the basic Einsteins explanation (as presented above) and you add to it that not only it curves the space but also makes it "swirl" and that can give the momentum for spin. You get a rotating dual torus "structure" (a sphere with south and north hole) that has Coriolis forces (force that makes water on each hemisphere rotate in different direction or hurricanes rotate in different direction). This rotation generates...Coriolis forces, magnetic fields, the gravity, electromagnetic radiation. There is a balance of how much force is applied on the system and how much radiation the system outputs (a feedback loop of gravitational filed going in and electromagnetic field going out).






    A penny for your input 184394






    Looking at the model of torus from a different perspective we see it has a hole in the middle..there is vacuum there - it is a place for where a singularity would be. That is why it is said that vacuum has a polarity and structure generated by rotation. Theoretical models were made for the "hole in the middle" to "solve all subatomic particles" which were through some phd stuff mathematically linked to Einsteins equations for big objects...the solution for it was vector equilibrium. This solution was given out of the mathematics that had nothing to do with "logical playing with geometry"...as mentioned above. This confirmed the geometry of the vacuum and it also offers a solution to the strong and week force problem.






    A penny for your input 184395






    To keep two positive charged magnets together can be a "hard thing to do" (you can try). The protons in atoms have a positive charged. When science calculated how much force would it take to bring protons into the atom they got a ...big number. So their conclusion was that this can not be gravitational force so they named it "strong force". It goes perfectly along the "bang" and dark matter. What keeps those in there? Well it is the strong force, what else... And the you know, strong force, is emanating gluons which...glue things together so that is how it is.
    Than the smaller dots termed quarks were found. And they demanded even a greater force and science came up with the color force (i wonder who makes up the names) and that strong force is just a residual force of this color force.

    If you make calculations for a black hole atom and calculate how much gravity is on a nuclei level (where protons etc are) the result is exactly the force you need to keep the atom together. So there is no strong force, there is gravity in the vicinity of singularity.

    So it could be said that we live inside of a black hole and that is why the sky is dark at night and that what we see (the lights) are radiating stars/objects that are on the outside of black hole we are in. We see the radiative (expanding) side we do not see contraction. That is also why torque force is not seen. There are evidences such as picture of a galxy with this enormous vortex coming form its center. In case of our galaxy this vortex is three thousand light years long. Such vortexes are visible thousands and thousands of light years away. What science sees are things coming out of the vortex. But if "water is going down the drain, air has to come out in order for water to come down". Science sees the radiative part it does not see the space time torque that gives a momentum for spinning.

    Another example are also quasars (luminous energetic galaxy) that are documented and all that by science. Quasars that are like a million of light years "long" and are spinning close to the speed of light when they arrive near the black hole. This spin is due to a torque but that is something that official science knows "nothing about" since they do not include it into the calculations. Same goes for mini quasars and pulsars (result of a super nova explosion)






    A penny for your input 184396






    About the super nova and the "death of a star". It is said that there is not such things as death. There is just a change of state.






    EDIT:typos and style


    Last edited by Spregovori on Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:56 am; edited 7 times in total
    mudra
    mudra

    Posts : 21426
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 66
    Location : belgium

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  mudra Tue Aug 31, 2010 7:02 pm

    You made an awesome research Spregovori.
    What I appreciate about you is that you
    really want to know and this gives you
    a beautifull humble attitude.

    Thank You for being you

    Love from me
    mudra
    Spregovori
    Spregovori

    Posts : 74
    Join date : 2010-04-09

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Spregovori Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:03 pm

    mudra wrote:You made an awesome research Spregovori.
    What I appreciate about you is that you
    really want to know and this gives you
    a beautifull humble attitude.

    Thank You for being you

    Love from me
    mudra

    Thank you. You always have a nice word for each person.
    I have a special memory of you (and also others) aiding me in time when Lan was passing away...

    and

    yes i wish to know "how things are" from all sources (was also called lazy for "just asking" and not doing enough of my own amm studies)... it is one thing to state "we are one" but to know it...why that is to be so...what is this based on...this is the tricky part especially if you attempt to go and prove it...which in most cases you can not and listening to official science can at times equal poison...so things like the one from Nassim Haramein are very welcomed. I still for example do not know the math behind what he is talking about but the explanation without math is helpful enough to amm "expand the horizon" of ones mind...and what is interesting about it is that in the amm extras (not part of his presentation) he talks about the "conspiracy" but from the point of his work...and than you have a short interview with a woman that has phd in nuclear physics and engineering saying that we are infinite beings with brain as a storage unit or a receiver, that information come from the "field of information" around us....if she can back that up with numbers when submitting a scientific paper..even better...but to me it is enough to get some sort of direction... What she said, some other source also stated as: thinking determines auric field composition which than attracts similar thinking "patterns" (fields)..which in a way explains the law of attraction and that the brain does not think, the body does via its mind centers (chakras) and if this are out of balance so is the person and what he/she "thinks about"

    So there are meeting points in what at first seems to be some completely different type of information and it is this points that make everything even more interesting...especially when you have at times so many people saying things that are a contradiction (something i already "ranted" about some time ago back on AV1)

    Spregovori
    Spregovori

    Posts : 74
    Join date : 2010-04-09

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Spregovori Wed Sep 08, 2010 3:29 pm




    A while ago i was introduced to George Kavassilas. He just recently had been interwived by Kerry Cassidy of Camelot Productions which again reminded me of him.

    http://georgekavassilas.org/

    He offers what i would call an "adjusted view".


    A penny for your input Chickenlove2





    P-R-S



    To not make this too long...

    What got me interested is his statement on problem-reaction-solution in a sense of a cosmic scale scam. More precisely...the problem being humanity as "lost sheep"....the reaction being what you are living and were living...and solution being...love and light - in an abused and distorted way of hive mind mentality.

    What got even more of my attention is him talking about how...we are told via various books, presentations and meditations on how we are to accept light from "out there" how we are to receive "love" that is given to us...to be absorbed in via meditations and alike. He states that this is simply abuse and the conditional love that can get confused very quickly with unconditional since humanity is so very deprived of love that even a tiny bit of it (conditional) can make us...thinking it is the real thing.

    He states that an actual light being will respect our sovereignty (or the potential for one)by allowing us (not interfering, not mixing its energy patterns in situation) by allowing us to....express light and capability for unconditional love...in all necessary proportions...that we already have inside of us...and do not need to put it in via our crown chakra and alike instructions...
    He also states that an actual light being can be recognized by simply knowing it is one and that there should be no need for it to prove it is one.

    He also mentions his experience with malevolent species of reptiles and grays. The solution to the problem, he says, is to go and hold the malevolent reptile...give him a big hug and told it how much you love it/him/her...and that will have it run away screaming...but you actually have to LOVE it. And it makes logical sense. Unconditional love (as stated in post 1) is love for ALL. He said that the beings of their vibration simply can not take it and that by finding and expressing your own light you can resist whatever attempt to manipulate or harm you.

    There are also some interesting things he has to say about ascension....Earth turning into a star etc...

    One of more "controversial" things he mentions is something i was "fighting with" some months ago and that is that duality as it is - is as it should be. We experience what we were meant to experience in order for us to learn. The "evil" NWO baker...etc...is there to learn from. We all might have been murderers in some life time and victims of murder in some other... Judge not, blame not... He tries to make a point that we should detach from drama (if that is ones path) by simply observing what is going on and not diving into it...by letting others to be as they are (allowance) knowing...they are all as they need to be and on the path they need to be...


    So a few quick basics to contemplate and see how it all fits.





    lindabaker
    lindabaker

    Posts : 1385
    Join date : 2010-04-15
    Location : straight ahead

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  lindabaker Wed Sep 08, 2010 4:13 pm

    Bump so the new kids on the block can read this thread.
    SuiGeneris
    SuiGeneris

    Posts : 1235
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Midgard

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  SuiGeneris Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:08 pm

    Spregovori wrote:



    One of more "controversial" things he mentions is something i was "fighting with" some months ago and that is that duality as it is - is as it should be. We experience what we were meant to experience in order for us to learn. The "evil" NWO baker...etc...is there to learn from. We all might have been murderers in some life time and victims of murder in some other... Judge not, blame not... He tries to make a point that we should detach from drama (if that is ones path) by simply observing what is going on and not diving into it...by letting others to be as they are (allowance) knowing...they are all as they need to be and on the path they need to be...
    So a few quick basics to contemplate and see how it all fits.

    -Are you still fighting with it? or do you have it resolved? Do you think everything is as it should be?

    -Do you already live a life in which you do not judge, blame others? yourself?

    -what does "detaching from drama" means to you? Do you think it has to do with annulling your emotions and not live life with passion?

    -How do you not dive into "drama" and at the same time avoid becoming complacent, condescending, apathetic and comfortably numb as a simple spectator of life?



    A penny for your input Xeia177Hugs

    Spregovori
    Spregovori

    Posts : 74
    Join date : 2010-04-09

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Spregovori Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:45 pm

    SuiGeneris wrote:

    (1)Are you still fighting with it? or do you have it resolved? Do you think everything is as it should be?

    (2)Do you already live a life in which you do not judge, blame others? yourself?

    (3)what does "detaching from drama" means to you? Do you think it has to do with annulling your emotions and not live life with passion?

    (4)How do you not dive into "drama" and at the same time avoid becoming complacent, condescending, apathetic and comfortably numb as a simple spectator of life?







    (1)



    After almost two years of "intensive" blogging (getting feedback from it), observing the human behavior ever since the age of 15, playing and (ab)using myself in various situations, going through all sorts of contradicting material in last couple of years...bumping into love and light every so often, being exposed to the drama of every day life since childhood....i can at this point state that..... YES....the people simply will not move their behind in first gear as long as they have it on comfortable and warm spot....they simply do not care....do not want to care or know....

    As horrible as it sounds (mostly due to our little understanding of things) even war and deaths of millions can bring progress. It is unfortunate that it has to be so. But that is clear to me and to the rest that not just know it but also feel/understand it. What remains is the majority that sees a "soviet or terrorist threat" and a need to defend themselves....step by step by step...to slowly figure out about who and what. Even the "truth movement" started with exposing this acts of horror and what is behind them....and than evolved from the basics, such as fractional banking system, to what is being discussed right now. Many people changed the state of energy (death) in one way or another before this level of discussion was reached.

    Is all of this part of some greater agenda? Do we have a soul contract..meaning we went into this reality...all of us...knowing very well about what is to come out of it? (no need to wait for ET than, we are all ET in this case) I personally can not say with 100% certainty that there is such a thing as soul contract, but i can say with all certainty, that what is know as "human"....can and does learn on mistakes or call it past actions, which is not necessarily a mistake. Also a "past action" does not mean that future depends or is in any way limited by the past. As some would say - future depends on the present focus one has.

    It is just now in last year or two that this is gradually changing....but for that to happen...a "bad thing" had to come first.
    Pleasant is appreciated only after unpleasant is experienced.

    (2)

    Realizing the world around you can bring you pain, can bring anger, can bring sorrow...can bring resentment....example: "How the F**** cant they see that BS!!!" i noticed in my own experiences that getting overly upset over the vast majority being so ignorant is of absolutely no benefit to anyone. People do harm, they can even do harm to you......but ask yourself why that happened...if you (anyone that reads) can sustain such level of honesty...
    I think there is nothing wrong if one wishes to SHARE...not impose or demand...but share the information (out of own initiative or if being asked) WITHOUT getting into the energy of someone protesting anti-war or fighting for peace and other more or less common miss intents. Not getting into the energy - you share it, you do not argue over it with the person....if the information is rejected, laughed upon, etc...

    (3)

    You will feel the emotion. It is part of this reality. It is part of you. How you "digest" the emotion is another thing. Cling to it, empower it, exaggerate it...and it will "back fire" with a speed of light. Yes it is very far from simple...or than again...it is as complicated as much as you make/complicate it. Feeling sadness does not make you a bad person. Being all "happy and flowers 24/7 state" is a sort of a mind wash. When one gets angry...recognize it....and let it go...do not let it direct you and consume you (you is not just you but anyone that is reading).

    (4)

    You do not go into drama by ALLOWING others to experience what they need to experience, while you yourself remain in observer mode and also undergo your own experiences. It does not mean indifference. It means you do care, but you do not kill yourself over it, since that (being a victim) has never ever contributed to the good of all.
    There will be change. Each change entails a certain degree of chaos. If one can not handle it now...how will it than handle the chaos?


    Am i a master in all of this points? No. Of course not. For one thing...i am still here....

    Hope my answers are clear enough...it was done in a "hurry".




    Last edited by Spregovori on Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:16 am; edited 4 times in total (Reason for editing : spelling, grammer, added a little of "elaborations")
    lindabaker
    lindabaker

    Posts : 1385
    Join date : 2010-04-15
    Location : straight ahead

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  lindabaker Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:49 pm

    SuiGeneris: Glad to see you posting! We missed you!

    Spregvori: Please keep writing...you have so many great thoughts and we enjoy them so much. You have a fearless style, and I am really appreciative of your courage.

    Linda
    Jonah
    Jonah

    Posts : 154
    Join date : 2010-04-19

    A penny for your input Empty Re: A penny for your input

    Post  Jonah Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:52 pm

    Spregovori wrote:
    My party....hmm i never "threw" a party...might be interesting to try it sometime...just that, it is possible, most would not consider it to be a "party". There are now many individuals that would come to the party and ask "hey man, where is the party"

    But hey...you are alive...so the party is on...every day, all day...

    Wow Spreg... I feel the same way... hahah and its been a party everyday since my eyes began to open... talk about good times.... Looking forward to reading this in its intirety....thank you very much...

      Current date/time is Mon Jun 21, 2021 12:29 pm