tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

2 posters

    False Flag in Odessa: The Pathetic U.S. Media Coverage

    JesterTerrestrial
    JesterTerrestrial


    Posts : 1766
    Join date : 2010-04-11
    Location : INNOVATION STATIONS !SCHOOL

    False Flag in Odessa: The Pathetic U.S. Media Coverage Empty False Flag in Odessa: The Pathetic U.S. Media Coverage

    Post  JesterTerrestrial Thu May 08, 2014 8:07 pm

    False Flag in Odessa: The Pathetic U.S. Media Coverage Odessa05_2900775b-400x249

    Photos of the victims of the Odessa fire which have been circulating on the Internet have cast doubt on the official version of events. It’s now clear that many of the anti-junta activists who occupied the Trade Unions House were neither burned to death nor died of smoke inhalation, but were savagely shot at point-blank range by agents and thugs who had infiltrated the building to kill as many of the occupants as possible, burn the corpses, and then slip away without notice. Some of the victims–like a young woman who was eight months pregnant –were strangled with an electrical chord and left slumped backwards over her desk in a room that shows no sign of fire or smoke damage. In another case, a woman was stripped naked from the waste down, raped, killed, and set ablaze.

    In still other cases, victims with bullet-holes through their skulls, had flammable fluid dumped on their heads and were incinerated, leaving a charred head atop a corpse whose clothes were untouched by fire. The sloppily-executed killing-spree proves that the fire was not the result of a spontaneous clash between pro and anti-Kiev demonstrators, but a carefully planned black-op that likely involved foreign Intel agencies working hand-in-hand with the fascist junta government in Kiev. Did we mention that the CIA has taken up residence in the Ukrainian capital? Here’s the scoop from the AFP:

    “Dozens of specialists from the US Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation are advising the Ukrainian government … helping Kiev end the rebellion in the east of Ukraine and set up a functioning security structure…” (CIA, FBI agents ‘advising Ukraine government: report, AFP)

    We all know about the CIA’s energetic efforts to create a “functioning security structure” in nations around the world. The CIA’s presence in Ukraine suggests that the US was either actively involved in the Odessa incident or knows who was. Either way, there should be an independent investigation before the case is referred to the ICC for prosecution.

    The rampage in Odessa is part a broader strategy to provoke Moscow into a military confrontation. US war planners want to draw Putin into a conflict to justify NATO expansion, block further EU-Russian economic integration, and facilitate the “pivot to Asia.” The victims in this tragedy were sacrificed to advance Washington’s imperial ambitions and to establish US global hegemony. Obama has repeatedly reiterated his unwavering support for the crackdown on dissidents in the east. In a Rose Garden press conference just days ago, the president applauded the military attack on civilians saying, “The Ukrainian government has shown remarkable restraint throughout this whole process.”

    Indeed, the Odessa graveyards are now full of people who can attest to the great restraint of the junta government that Obama so admires.

    The coverage of the Odessa massacre by the western media is as bad as any in recent memory. The giant news conglomerates no longer make any attempt to pretend they’re anything other propaganda organs for the State. Even by that low standard, the coverage has been abysmal. Here’s a typical summary from an article on the liberal website, Huffington Post.

    “Police said the deadly fire broke out in a trade union building, but did not give details on how it started. Earlier, police said at least three people had died in a clash between the two sides in the city of 1 million.

    According to Ukrainian news reports, the pro-Kiev demonstrators broke up an encampment of Moscow supporters outside the trade union building. The latter took refuge in the building, which then caught fire.
    Odessa police spokesman Volodymyr Shasbliyenko told AP the fire apparently was caused by Molotov cocktails. He had no further details or identities of the victims.” (Odessa Building Fire Kills Dozens, AP)

    The author deliberately misleads his readers about what really took place. The fire did not “break out” in a trade union building. It was started. There’s no debate about this. There’s video footage of the whole incident and tons of eyewitness reports. Right sector goons started the fire by throwing Molotov cocktails through the windows. It’s all on tape.

    Second, the “pro-Kiev demonstrators” (did not) “break up an encampment of Moscow supporters outside the trade union building…which then caught fire.” This is nonsense. The fascist extremists burned down the tent city, chased the activists into the building, barricaded the exits, and then set the building on fire with the obvious intention of killing the people inside. Again, there is no debate about this. It’s all on video. The US media is involved in a massive cover up, mainly because a investigation would undoubtedly point to US involvement. This is why none of the major news organizations are covering an incident which would normally be headline news. Odessa is unique blend of Waco and Columbine, a combo that editors typically use to boost sagging ratings by exploiting public empathy and outrage. Only this time, the media has minimized its coverage and refused to report on a story that would probably lead straight to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

    While the New York Times has been widely criticized for publishing fake photos of Russian soldiers in Ukraine, the Wall Street Journal wins the trophy for absolute worst coverage. In a piece titled “Deadly Ukraine Fire Likely Sparked by Rebels, Government Says”, the WSJ pushes the improbable theory that the anti-coup activists inside the building actually burned the building down themselves, a pathetic attempt to blame the victims of a ruthless government crackdown. Here’s an excerpt from the article:

    “The fire began from the roof. There were extremists there, we found casings and firearms,” Mr. Chebotar said. “But something unexpected happened; their Molotov cocktails fell, and ignited the higher floors of the building.” (Deadly Ukraine Fire Likely Sparked by Rebels, Wall Street Journal)

    Utterly ridiculous. Are the editors of the WSJ aware of the fact that footage of the Neo Nazis throwing Molotov cocktails at the building are all over the Internet?

    The article, of course, fails to explain how many of the people inside the building were either shot or strangled to death. Nor does the author speculate on why the police stood by while people hurled themselves from windows to escape the fire or were savagely beaten by right wing extremists on the pavement in front of the building. Instead, the WSJ tries to provide a plausible excuse for the one part of the story it chooses to focus on as if “who started the fire” can be separated from other important details. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the 40 victims of the incident were killed in a homicidal rampage that was perpetrated by Obama’s new friends in Kiev. No amount of whitewash is going to hide that one glaring fact. Here’s how Serbian historian and political analyst, Nebosja Malic, summed it up:

    “According to all the evidence that I have seen, the entire thing in Odessa was a giant false flag operation. It was a provocation, it was one of those stage massacres that the pro-Western forces from Bosnia to Kosovo, now Ukraine excel at staging, intended to draw Russia to overreact…

    “We have proof that the West is instigating this. And just the other day, Catherine Ashton, the EU’s commissioner for foreign policy, pretty much gave a green light to the extremists from Kiev. She pretty much said they had a right to establish law and order within the borders of the country. I would say that the EU has blood on its hands, especially Catherine Ashton. It’s the same thing they did in Yugoslavia in the 90s, when they started encouraging radicals, extremists, secessionists.” (Interview with Nebosja Malic, RT)

    It’s true that Washington supports Neo-Nazi extremists who burned down the Odessa Trade Unions House. If that wasn’t the case, then Obama would have spoken out forcefully against the action, which he has not. That implies that things are going according to plan. Malic is also correct when he says the fire was a “giant false flag operation” which refers to a covert military operation where agents disguise themselves as members of their adversary’s group to initiate a provocation that will then be blamed on the other side. In this case, pro-regime fascists (and probably agents from the Security Services) disguised themselves as Kiev regime opponents, in order to throw bricks and stones at the police and Right Sector goons. This was the flashpoint that started the melee that ended in a massacre.

    Videos on Russia Today show the agents in red arm bands mingled with the pro-Russia activists, initiated a confrontation with the cops, and then quickly switched sides when the fighting broke out. This is classic false flag operation. The police were obviously in on the scam, as they immediately opened their ranks to let the imposters slip by when the street-scrum began. These same imposters were later filmed shooting handguns and automatic weapons in the direction of the building just minutes after they had switched sides. (Take a look at this video from 3:30 minutes to the 6 minute-point and decide for yourself whether this was a false flag operation or not.)

    Bottom line: There was nothing spontaneous about the clash that led to the catastrophic fire that killed 40 people in the Trade Unions House. It was a carefully planned and executed operation designed to shock Moscow into sending troops to protect ethnic Russians in Ukraine. If the CIA is working in Kiev –as it is–there is no doubt that they either knew or actively assisted the operation.

    In related news: Moscow has announced it will “deploy additional forces in Crimea as part of beefing up the Black Sea fleet…before year’s end”. According to RT: “The fleet will receive new submarines and surface ships of new generation this year.”

    The Kremlin is responding to the buildup of NATO forces in Eastern Europe and the Black Sea where additional aircraft, warships and ground troops have been deployed in case war breaks out. Also, according to RT:

    “NATO’s three-week ‘Spring Storm’ drills, involving a record-breaking number of 6,000 troops, have begun in Estonia….(bringing) together a record number of allied troops.” (Also) around 150 personnel of the US airborne division arrived in a military transport aircraft to Amari airbase (while) the UK and France deployed eight fighter jets to Lithuania and Poland to strengthen NATO air defense over the Baltic regions.” (NATO’s record 6,000-strong drills kick off in Estonia amid Ukraine tensions, RT)

    So while the death toll mounts, the slide to war continues to gain momentum. Odessa was supposed to be the tipping point, the “catalyzing event” that would draw Putin into the fighting. But it hasn’t worked out that way. Putin has stayed on the sidelines and refused to take the bait. That means there’ll be more provocations to come; more false flags, more bloodshed, more stage-managed terror disguised as civil unrest. Eventually, people will see who’s behind all the trouble. But how many will have died by then?

    Note: Here’s a 12 minute video on Obama’s fascist friends in Ukraine. Listen to the last minute of the video to hear neocon Victoria Nuland praise Ukraine’s development of “democratic skills and institutions” with the appropriate backdrop of balaclava-clad Nazis and brightly colored swastikas.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/false-flag-in-odessa-the-pathetic-u-s-media-coverage/5381326


    I have not looked much into what is happening there just saw this and thought it might be of interest. The video below was also shared today Posted as is verify for yourself. MERLIN JT! MAAT

    ODESSA 5/02: The Untold Truth of Kulikovo Field [Part 1 ]


    Resistenza Antisistema via Google+9 hours ago

    Documentario sulla strage di Odessa
    Reply ·

    Martin Lipocky via Google+5 hours ago

    #Odessa massacre 05/02
    Video footage compilation unfolding who was standing behind the massacre of #antimaidan and anti-gov't activists - #Ukraine #ukrainecrisis 
    Reply ·

    FCCO4 hours ago

    there were 700-800 ukrainian nationalists from all over ukraine. maidan crowd 90% were not from Odessa
    Reply ·

    8712222q1 day ago

    surender: https://youtu.be/xUoYJ5Q9kjU and fb page / https://www.facebook.com/southfronteng
    Reply ·

    sunriseger1 day ago

    is this red band a sign for the cops, not to arrest them? who are these guys? provocateurs? omg, all our media got pranked. this is going to spread viral.
    Reply · 1

    max whitmore23 hours ago

    I think they are agent provocateurs .The bulk of the nasty crowd are football ultras.They were there to incite the ultras . .
    Reply ·

    jill still13 hours ago

    Odessa, Ukraine, 2.5.2014: Man who burned trade union house had contact to Ukrainian government
    Mykola of the right sector. A journalist asked where the three men are from and if Mykola is talking with the minister Awakow. Mykola answers that he is from Odessa. But residents from Odessa confirmed that he lied that he is not from Odessa. They also told us that they are very certain that he talked to Arsen Awakow. This gives further evidence that the massacre was ordered by the Ukrainian government. http://ukraine-human-rights.org/was-the-massacre-in-odessa-planned-by-the-ukrainian-government/
    Reply · 1

    HERC53842 hours ago

    vratit ćemo vam uz božiju pomoć
    Reply ·

    Russkaya Pravda1 day ago

    Guys, more videos:
    https://www.facebook.com/UkraineCrisisAntiMaidan
    Reply ·

    Людмила К1 day ago

    https://secure.avaaz.org/ru/petition/Sovet_Bezopasnosti_OON_Ostanovit_fashizm_na_Ukraine/sign/
    Reply ·

    Jandy man1 day ago

    This is not something I can like. But want appreciate the author´s effort and work. Truth has to be spread to the world
    Reply · 1

    Инна Богданова1 day ago

    молодцы!
    репостим!!!
    Reply ·

    Владислав Тишин1 day ago

    РТР будет спецкор по людям с красными лентами?
    Translate
    Reply ·

    Анатолий Чешурин1 day ago

    Одесса - город герой, только героев в нем почему то не осталось.... Обос---сь Одесса, к моему большому сожалению....
    Translate
    Reply · 1

    Денис Матущенко1 day ago

    Почему русские не придут

    eloa_ru

    Русские не придут.
    Не приедут на танках, не прилетят на вертолётах.
    Не будет вежливых зелёных человечков с автоматом наперевес.

    Они не пришли на киевский майдан.
    Ни в декабре, ни в январе, ни в феврале.
    Не разогнали его и не помогли беркуту.

    И они не придут в Одессу.
    Сколько бы людей и с какой жестокостью там не убили бы, кто бы их не убил, они не придут защищать русских и пророссийских одесситов, не придут их спасать, не придут наказывать виновных в геноциде русских.

    Русские не введут войска на Украину, как это ни прискорбно и цинично не звучит для одних и невероятно и радостно для других.

    Хватит стенать и взывать о помощи, хватит звать российскую армию, русофилы.
    Хватит трястись в параноидальных припадках, русофобы.

    Не будет никакой российской армии.

    Почему?
    А давайте посчитаем.
    Вот, город-герой Одесса, например: один миллион жителей.

    Во время трагических событий последних дней на Куликовом поле людей с георгиевскими лентами было пару сотен, бандерлогов – пару тысяч.
    Вызволять пострадавших узников пришла одна тысяча.

    А теперь вопросы.
    Первый: если бандерлоги взяли верх над пророссийскими, то что Одесса за город?
    Пророссийский или бандеровский?

    После произошедшего, как это ни цинично, логичнее всего назвать её в унисон с Фарион жемчужиной Бандерштадта.

    Нет?

    Тогда вопрос второй: а где, собственно, весь миллион одесситов?

    Где он был с ноября?
    Где он был, когда люди заживо горели в Доме профсоюзов?
    Где он был на следующий день?
    Где он сейчас?

    Не горстка активистов, а миллион жителей?
    Да сто тысяч хотя бы?
    Вот где?

    Я вам скажу.
    Дома.
    Или на работе.
    Или на даче.
    Или в кабаке.
    Да мало ли мест!

    Где его нет, так это на войне.
    Которая вообще-то уже идёт вовсю.

    А теперь – внимание – собственно, третий вопрос: куда и зачем вводить российскую армию?
    Кого спасать и кого защищать?
    К какому окопу, так сказать, подносить патроны?

    В город, где миллион жителей живёт обычной жизнью, когда убивают сотню?
    В город, где миллион жителей живёт обычной жизнью, когда только тысяча добивается освобождения невинных раненых

    Чтобы этот миллион назвал русских оккупантами, имея на это полное право и весомые основания?

    Что российская армия забыла в бандеровском городе, где с бандеровцами воюет мизерное меньшинство жителей?

    Одесситы, русские не придут.
    Русские никогда не придут в город, по которому можно пройти бандеровским маршем.

    Русские приходят только тогда и туда, где их будут встречать триколорами и цветами.
    Как освободителей.

    А в вас, одесситы, у русских есть серьёзные основания сомневаться.

    Поэтому русские не придут.

    Русские не придут в Одессу ни сегодня, ни завтра, ни послезавтра.

    Они уже пришли туда. 200 лет назад.
    И с тех пор не уходили.

    Русские – это вы!
    Или вы не русские?
    Русские?
    Докажите!
    Read more (95 lines) · Translate
    Reply ·

    Camillo Centofuochi9 hours ago
    Resistenza Antisistema originally shared this

    Documentario sulla strage di Odessa
    2

    Nata_Moscow1 day ago

    Большое спасибо авторам. Вы проделали очень нужную работу.
    Нужно распространять.
    To the creators of this video - the work you've done is of great importance and is very much appreciated.
    I urge everyone to distribute it.
    Translate
    mudra
    mudra


    Posts : 23307
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 70
    Location : belgium

    False Flag in Odessa: The Pathetic U.S. Media Coverage Empty Re: False Flag in Odessa: The Pathetic U.S. Media Coverage

    Post  mudra Fri May 09, 2014 7:36 am

    Ukraine - we must not 'consent' to genocide

    The mainstream media are working hard to obscure NATO's hideous plot to rekindle the Cold War in Ukraine, writes Diana Johnstone, as they seek to engineer our 'consent' for yet more heinous acts to come. To prevent the horror of a full scale war, first we must grasp the truth.

    Odessa is proof that whatever happens, the NATO political class, political leaders and media united, have decided on their story and are sticking to it.

    In Germany these days, very many citizens object to the endless Russia-bashing of the NATO-oriented mainstream media.

    They may point out that the US-backed regime change in Kiev, putting in power an ultra-right transitional government eager to join NATO, posed an urgent threat to preservation of Russia's only warm water naval base in Crimea.

    Under the circumstances, and inasmuch as the Crimean population overwhelmingly approved, reinstating Crimea in the Russian Federation was a necessary defensive move.

    In Germany, anyone who says thing like that can be denigrated as a "Putinversteher" (a Putin understander).

    Hate is the answer

    That says it all. We are not supposed to understand. We are supposed to hate. The media are there to see to that.

    While the West doggedly refuses to understand Putin and Russia, Vladimir Putin, on the other hand, seems to understand things pretty well.

    He seems to understand that he and his nation are being systematically lured into a death trap by an enemy which excels in the contemporary art of 'communication'.

    In a war situation, NATO communication means that it doesn't matter who does what. The only thing that matters is who tells the story. The Western media are telling the story in a way which depends on not understanding Russia, and not understanding Putin.

    Putin and Russia become fictional villains in the Western version, just the latest reincarnation of Hitler and Nazi Germany.

    The Odessa massacre

    The horrific massacre in Odessa on May 2 proved this. The photographic evidence, the testimony of numerous eye witnesses, the smoldering bodies and the shouts of the killers are all there to prove what happened.

    Tents erected to collect signatures in favor of a referendum to introduce a federal system into Ukraine (now a politically divided but totally centralized state) were set on fire by a militia of fascist thugs who attacked the local federalists as "separatists" (accusing them of wanting to "separate" from Ukraine to join Russia, when that is not what they are seeking).

    The local activists fled into the big trade union building on the square where they were pursued, assaulted, murdered and set on fire by "Ukrainian nationalists", acting on behalf of the illegitimate Kiev regime supported by the West.

    No matter how vicious the assaults, Western media saw no evil, heard no evil, spoke no evil. They deplored a "tragedy" which just sort of happened.

    Odessa is proof that whatever happens, the NATO political class, political leaders and media united, have decided on their story and are sticking to it. The nationalists that seized power in Kiev are the good guys, the people being assaulted in Odessa and in Eastern Ukraine are "pro-Russian" and therefore the 'bad guys'.

    Understanding Putin

    So despite everything, let's try to understand President Putin, which is really not very hard. Behind every conscious action there should be a motive. Let's look at motives.

    Today, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague, who certainly gives every sign of never understanding - or wanting to understand - anything, parroted the NATO line that Russia was "trying to orchestrate conflict and provocation" in Ukraine's east and south.

    That makes no sense. Putin has absolutely no motive to want civil war to rage in neighboring Ukraine, and very strong reasons to do all he can to avoid it. It confronts him with a serious dilemma.

    Ongoing vicious attacks by fanatic nationalists from Western Ukraine on citizens in the east and south of the country can only incite the victimized Russian-speaking Ukrainians to call on Russia for help.

    But at the same time, Putin must know that those Russophone Ukrainians do not really want to be invaded by Russia. Perhaps they want something impossible.

    And it is perfectly obvious that any use of Russia's military force to protect people in Ukraine would let loose an even wilder demonization of Putin as "the new Hitler" who is invading countries "for no reason".

    NATO's bear trap

    And NATO would use this, as it has already used the reunification of Crimea with Russia, as "proof" that Europe must tighten its alliance, establish military bases throughout Eastern Europe and (above all) spend more money on "defense" (buying US military equipment).

    The Western takeover of the Kiev government is clearly a provocation to draw Putin into a trap that certain Western strategists (Zbigniew Brzezinski being the chief theorist) hope will cause Putin's downfall and plunge Russia into a crisis that can lead to its eventual dismemberment.

    Putin can only wish to find a peaceful solution to the Ukrainian mess.

    While Washington reverts to Cold War 'containment' policy to "isolate" Russia, Putin today held talks in Moscow with Didier Burkhalter, the Swiss president and current chairman of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), in hope of initiating some sort of peaceful mediation.

    On this occasion, Putin announced that he had pulled back Russian forces from the border with Ukraine. He indicated that this was to ease concerns over their positioning, meaning claims that Russia was preparing an invasion.

    He also advised against holding referendums for greater autonomy in the Russophone areas until "conditions for dialogue" can be created.

    However, news reports indicated that this reported military pullback caused new concerns among some Ukrainians, who felt Russia was abandoning them in their hour of need, and among some Russians, who feared the President was backing down under Western pressure.

    An imminent false flag attack?

    It is not impossible that the pullback order was linked to a Novosti RIA report dated May 6, which indicated that the Ukrainian secret service was planning an imminent false flag operation in order to accuse Russia of violating the border with Ukraine.

    Novosti said it had learned from security circles in Kiev that the Ukrainian secret service SBU had secretly shipped about 200 Russian army uniforms and some 70 forged Russian officer ID into the Eastern Ukrainian protest stronghold of Donetz, to be used to stage a false attack on Ukrainian border patrols.

    Novosti said the reports were unconfirmed, but they could nevertheless be taken seriously by the Russians. "The plan would be to simulate an attack on Ukrainian border troops and to film it for the media", the report said.

    In connection with the plan, a dozen or so combatants from the ultranationalist Right Sector were to cross the border and kidnap a Russian soldier in order to present him as "proof" of Russian military incursion. The operation was scheduled for May 8 or 9.

    By pulling Russian troops farther away from the border, Putin could hope to make the false flag operation less plausible and perhaps to forestall it.

    read on :  Arrow http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/commentators/2389125/ukraine_we_must_not_consent_to_genocide.html

    Love Always
    mudra

      Current date/time is Mon Nov 18, 2024 6:34 pm