tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

+3
lindabaker
TRANCOSO
burgundia
7 posters

    Was it HAARP??

    burgundia
    burgundia


    Posts : 5520
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Location : Poland

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Was it HAARP??

    Post  burgundia Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:14 pm

    TRANCOSO
    TRANCOSO


    Posts : 3930
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  TRANCOSO Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:52 pm

    HAARP Boils the Upper Atmosphere

    HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable
    electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric
    heater." (The ionosphere is the electrically charged sphere
    surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40 to
    600 miles above Earth's surface.)

    Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio
    telescope: antennas send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is
    the test run for a superpowerful radio-wave beaming technology that
    lifts areas of the ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those
    areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto Earth and
    penetrate everything — living and dead. HAARP publicity gives
    the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research
    Project is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the
    ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However,
    other U.S. military documents put it more clearly: HAARP aims to
    learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense
    purposes." Communicating with submarines is only one of those
    purposes.

    Press releases and other information from the military on HAARP
    continually downplay what it could do. Publicity documents insist
    that the HAARP project is no different from other ionospheric
    heaters operating safely throughout the world in places such as Arecibo, Puerto Rico;
    Tromsø, Norway; and the former Soviet Union. However, a 1990
    government document indicates that the radio frequency (rf) power
    zap will drive the ionosphere to unnatural activities: "At the
    highest hf powers available in the West, the instabilities commonly
    studied are approaching their maximum rf energy dissipative
    capability, beyond which the plasma processes will 'run away' until
    the next limiting factor is reached."

    If the military, in cooperation with the University of Alaska,
    Fairbanks, can show that this new ground-based "Star Wars"
    technology is sound, they both win. The military has a relatively
    inexpensive defense shield and the university can brag about the
    most dramatic geophysical manipulation since atmospheric explosions
    of nuclear bombs. After successful testing, they would have the
    military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for Alaska's
    North Slope natural gas.

    Looking at the other patents which build on the work of a Texas
    physicist named Bernard Eastlund, it becomes clearer how the military intends
    to use the HAARP transmitter. It also makes government denials less believable.
    The military knows how it intends to use this technology, and has
    made it clear in their documents. The military has deliberately
    misled the public through sophisticated word games, deceit and
    outright disinformation.

    The military says the HAARP system could:

    • give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option through at least 1986);
    • replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology;
    • be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP with a more flexible and accurate system;
    • provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communications systems working;
    • provide a wide-area Earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements;
    • be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area; and
    • be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete.
    The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in
    sound national defense and to those concerned about cost-cutting.
    However, the possible uses which the HAARP records do not explain,
    and which can only be found in U.S. Air Force, Army, Navy and other
    federal agency records, are alarming. Moreover, effects from the
    reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield —
    the ionosphere — could be cataclysmic, according to some
    scientists.

    One Alaskan puts it bluntly. A founder of the NO HAARP movement, Clare Zickuhr, says:
    "The military is going to give the ionosphere a big kick and see what happens."

    The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what
    exactly will happen, but a Penn State science article brags about
    that uncertainty. Macho science? The HAARP project uses the largest
    energy levels yet played with, by what Begich and Manning call "the
    big boys with their new toys." It is an experiment on the sky, and
    experiments are done to find out something not already known.
    Independent scientists told Begich and Manning that a HAARP-type
    "skybuster" with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global
    vandalism.

    HAARP History

    The patents described below were the package of ideas which were
    originally controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated
    (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the
    biggest oil companies in the world. APTI was the contractor that
    built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the patents
    and the second-phase construction contract to E-Systems in June
    1994.

    E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the
    world, doing work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations
    and others. Eighteen billion dollars of their annual sales are to
    these organizations, with $800 million for black projects —
    projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told
    how the money is being spent.

    E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, which is one of the largest
    defense contractors in the world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as
    number 42 on the Fortune 500 list of companies. Raytheon has
    thousands of patents, some of which will be valuable in the HAARP
    project. Twelve patents are the backbone of the HAARP project, and
    are now buried among the thousands of others held in the name of
    Raytheon.

    Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent #4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region
    in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere," was
    sealed for a year under a government secrecy order.

    The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different: the radio frequency
    (rf) radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the
    ionosphere. This difference throws an unprecedented amount of
    energy into the ionosphere. The Eastlund device would allow a
    concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter, compared to others
    only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.

    This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the
    ways necessary to create futuristic effects described in the
    patent. According to the patent, the work of Nikola
    Tesla
    in the early 1900's formed the basis of the research.

    What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the
    patents? They could make enormous profits by beaming electrical
    power, without wires, from a powerhouse in the gas fields to the
    consumer.

    For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of
    the intended uses for HAARP. In April 1995, however, Begich found
    other patents connected with a "key personnel" list for APTI. Some
    of these new APTI patents were indeed a wireless system for sending
    electrical power.

    Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or completely
    disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems.
    Further, this ability to spray large areas of Earth with
    electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies — and to control
    changes in those waves — makes it possible to knock out
    communications on land or sea as well as in the air. The patent
    said:

    "Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented
    amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations
    and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random
    pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better
    controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art,
    particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at
    various altitudes. . . .

    "It is possible not only to interfere with third-party
    communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to
    carry out a communications network even though the rest of the
    world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what is used
    to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one
    knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the
    same time.

    "Large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly
    high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned
    drag forces with resultant destruction. . . .

    "Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper-atmosphere wind patterns
    by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. . . . Molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, and other concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. . . ." Begich found eleven other APTI patents. They told how to make "Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation," power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon radar, detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads, electromagnetic pulses previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and other "Star Wars" tricks. This cluster of patents underlays the HAARP weapon system.

    Mental Manipulation
    Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes.
    For example, U.S. Air Force documents revealed that a system had
    been developed for manipulating and disrupting human mental
    processes through pulsed radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of
    HAARP) over large geographical areas.

    The most telling material about this technology came from writings
    of Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National Security Advisor to
    President Carter) and J.F. MacDonald (Science Advisor to President
    Johnson and a Professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about
    use of power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental
    warfare
    . The documents showed how these effects might be
    caused, and the negative effects on human health and thinking.

    The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most
    disturbing. More than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of
    footnotes, chronicle the work of Harvard professors, military
    planners and scientists as they plan and test this use of the
    electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers
    describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva.
    It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur
    the same ranges which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.

    The following statement was made more than 25 years ago in a book
    which Brzezinski wrote while a professor at Columbia University:
    "Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J. F. MacDonald specialist in problems of warfare says accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes 'could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the Earth. . . . In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period. . . .' No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."

    In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory
    Committee and later a member of the President's Council on
    Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of
    environmental-control technologies for military purposes. The most
    profound comment he made as a geophysicist was:
    "The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy."

    While yesterday's geophysicists predicted today's advances, are
    HAARP program managers delivering on the vision? The geophysicists
    recognized that adding energy to the environmental soup could have
    large effects. However, humankind has already added substantial
    amounts of electromagnetic energy into our environment without
    understanding what might constitute critical mass. The book by
    Begich and Manning raises questions. Have these additions been
    without effect, or is there a cumulative amount beyond which
    irreparable damage can be done? Is HAARP another step in a journey
    from which we cannot turn back? Are we about to embark on another
    energy experiment which unleashes another set of demons from
    Pandora's box?

    As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a "more controlled
    and directed society" would gradually appear, linked to technology.
    This society would be dominated by an elite group which impresses
    voters by allegedly superior scientific know-how. Angels
    Don't Play This HAARP further quotes Brzezinski:
    "Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it exploits."

    His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the
    "elite" are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases
    steadily. The policies to permit the tools to be used are already
    in place. How could the United States be changed, bit by bit, into
    the predicted, highly controlled technosociety? Among the "stepping
    stones" Brzezinski expected were persisting social crises and use
    of the mass media to gain the public's confidence.

    In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims:
    "The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi military situations. . . . Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat-ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent, and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop. . . . One last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous phenomena."

    Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The
    author of the government report refers to an earlier Air Force
    document about the uses of radio-frequency radiation in combat
    situations. (Here Begich and Manning note that HAARP is the most
    versatile and the largest radio-frequency transmitter in the
    world.)

    The United States Congressional Record deals with the use of HAARP
    for penetrating the Earth with signals bounced off the ionosphere.
    These signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many
    kilometers in order to locate underground munitions, minerals and
    tunnels. For 1996, the U.S. Senate has set aside $15 million to
    develop this ability alone: Earth-penetration tomography.

    The problem is that the frequency needed for Earth-penetrating
    radiations is within the frequency range most cited for disruption
    of human mental functions. It may also have profound effects on
    migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an
    undisturbed energy field to find their routes.

    As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not enough,
    Eastlund bragged that the superpowerful ionospheric heater could
    control weather.

    Begich and Manning brought to light government documents indicating
    that the military has weather-control technology. When HAARP is
    eventually built to its full-power level, it could create weather
    effects over entire hemispheres. If one government experiments with
    the world's weather patterns, what is done in one place will impact
    everyone else on the planet. Angels Don't Play This
    HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla's
    inventions resonance which affects planetary systems.

    Bubble of Electric Particles

    Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews with
    independent scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D.,
    a long and impressive career in high-energy physics, and has been
    published in prestigious science journals and books. Rauscher
    commented on HAARP: "You're pumping tremendous energy into an
    extremely delicate molecular configuration that comprises these
    multilayers we call the ionosphere."

    The ionosphere is prone to catalytic reactions, she explained: if a
    small part is changed, a major change in the ionosphere can happen.
    In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr.
    Rauscher shared her mental picture of it: a soap-bubble like sphere
    surrounding the Earth's atmosphere, with movements swirling over
    the surface of the bubble. If a big enough hole is punched through
    it, she predicts it could pop.

    Slicing the Ionosphere

    Physicist Daniel Winter, Ph.D., of Waynesville, North Carolina,
    says HAARP high-frequency emissions can couple with the long-wave
    (low-frequency, or ELF) pulses the Earth grid uses to distribute
    information as vibrations to synchronize dances of life in the
    biosphere. Dan terms this geomagnetic action "Earth's information
    bloodstream" and says it is likely that coupling of HAARP hf
    (high-frequency) with natural ELF (extremely low-frequency) can
    cause unplanned, unsuspected side effects.

    David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background
    in electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP
    radiations with the ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid:
    "HAARP will not burn 'holes' in the ionosphere. That is a dangerous understatement of what HAARP's giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning relative to thin electric shells of the multi layer membrane of ionospheres that absorb and shield Earth's surface from intense solar radiation, including charged-particle storms in solar winds erupting from the Sun. Earth's axial spin means that HAARP in a burst lasting more than a few minutes will slice through the ionosphere like a microwave knife. This produces not a hole, but a long tear an incision."
    <blockquote> Crudely Plucking the Strings
    </blockquote>"Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice across geomagnetic flux . . . a donut-shaped spool of magnetic strings like longitude meridians [on maps]. HAARP may not 'cut' these strings in Gaia's magnetic mantle, but will pulse each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony high frequencies. These noisy impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all through the geomagnetic web.
    <blockquote>
    "The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands,
    and the web's vibrations alert the spider to possible prey. HAARP
    will be a man-made microwave finger poking at the web, sending
    out confusing signals, if not tearing holes in the threads.

    "Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's
    geomagnetic harp are unknown and, I suspect, barely thought of.
    Even if thought of, the intent [of HAARP] is to learn to exploit
    any effects, not to play in tune to global symphonies."

    </blockquote>Feverish Earth
    Among other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His
    degree is in electrical engineering and he spent four years
    building nuclear weapons. He says, "But most of the theories that
    we have been taught by scientists to believe in seem to be falling
    apart."

    Schaefer talks about imbalances already caused by the industrial
    and atomic age, especially by radiation of large numbers of tiny,
    high-velocity particles "like very small spinning tops" into our
    environment. The unnatural level of motion of highly energetic
    particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts surrounding
    Earth is the villain in weather disruptions, according to this
    model which describes an Earth discharging its buildup of heat,
    relieving stress and regaining a balanced condition through
    earthquakes and volcanic action: "One might compare the abnormal
    energetic state of the Earth and its atmosphere to a car battery
    which has become overcharged with the normal flow of energy jammed
    up, resulting in hot spots, electrical arcing, physical cracks and
    general turbulence as the pent-up energy tries to find someplace to
    go."

    In a second analogy, Schaefer says: "Unless we desire the death of
    our planet, we must end the production of unstable particles which
    are generating the Earth's fever. A first priority to prevent this
    disaster would be to shut down all nuclear power plants and end the
    testing of atomic weapons, electronic warfare and 'Star Wars.'"

    Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric heater yet,
    deliberately to create more instabilities in a huge plasma layer
    — the ionosphere — and to rev up the energy level of
    charged particles.

    Electronic Rain from the Sky
    The military has published papers about electron precipitation from
    the magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged particles which
    stream toward Earth's magnetic poles) caused by manmade
    very-low-frequency electromagnetic waves: "These precipitated
    particles can produce secondary ionization, emit x rays, and cause
    significant perturbation in the lower ionosphere.

    Two Stanford University radio scientists offer evidence of what
    technology can do to affect the sky by making waves on Earth. They
    showed that very-low-frequency radio waves can vibrate the
    magnetosphere and cause high-energy particles to cascade into the
    Earth's atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off, they could
    stop the flow of energetic particles.

    Weather Control
    Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us
    hard. [The Stanford researchers'] work suggests that technicians
    could control global weather by sending relatively small "signals"
    into the Van Allen belt (radiation belts around Earth). Thus
    Tesla's resonance effects can control enormous energies by tiny
    triggering signals.

    The Begich/Manning book asks whether that knowledge will be used by
    war-oriented or biosphere-oriented scientists.

    The military has had about 20 years to work on weather warfare
    methods, which it euphemistically calls weather modification. For
    example, rain making technology was taken for a few test rides in
    Vietnam. The U.S. Department of Defense sampled lightning and
    hurricane manipulation studies in Project Skyfire and Project
    Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated technologies that
    would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP
    cites an expert who says the military studied both lasers and
    chemicals which they figured could damage the ozone layer over an
    enemy.

    Looking at ways to cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them,
    was part of the project named Prime Argus, decades ago. The money
    for that came from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
    (DARPA, now under the acronym ARPA).

    In 1994 the U.S. Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020
    master plan, which includes weather control. Scientists have
    experimented with weather control since the 1940's, but Spacecast
    2020 noted that "using environmental modification techniques to
    destroy, damage or injure another state [is] prohibited." Having
    said that, the Air Force claimed that technological advance
    "compels a reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky
    topic."

    Forty Years of Zapping the Sky?

    As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on weather
    modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. Department
    of Defense was studying "ways to manipulate the charges of the
    Earth and sky and so affect the weather" by using an electronic
    beam to ionize or deionize the atmosphere over a given area.

    In 1966, Professor Gordon J.F. MacDonald was Associate Director of
    the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University
    of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science
    Advisory Committee, and later a member of the President's Council
    on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of
    environmental-control technologies for military purposes. MacDonald
    made a revealing comment: "The key to geophysical warfare is the
    identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition
    of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of
    energy."

    World-recognized scientist MacDonald had a number of ideas for
    using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what
    was, at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his
    chapter "How to Wreck the Environment" for the book Unless Peace
    Comes, he was not kidding around. In it he describes the use of
    weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice-cap melting
    or destabilization, ozone-depletion techniques, earthquake
    engineering, ocean-wave control and brainwave manipulation using
    the planet's energy fields. He also said that these types of
    weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually
    undetectable by their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military's
    intention to do environmental engineering is well-documented.

    U.S. Congress subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International
    Environment looked into military weather and climate modification
    conducted in the early 1970's. "What emerged was an awesome picture
    of far-ranging research and experimentation by the Department of
    Defense into ways environmental tampering could be used as a
    weapon," said another author cited in Angels Don't Play This
    HAARP.

    The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into
    the state of the art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise
    lawmakers today? They may find out that technologies developed out
    of the HAARP experiments in Alaska could deliver on Gordon
    MacDonald's vision, because leading-edge scientists are describing
    global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems but
    also as an electrical system.

    Small Input, Big Effect
    HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point
    to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield
    protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy
    particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with Earth's
    magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it
    back from going directly to the Earth's surface, says Charles Yost
    of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina. "If the ionosphere
    is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently
    disturbed."

    Another scientist interviewed said there is a superpowerful
    electrical connection between the ionosphere and the part of the
    atmosphere where our weather comes on stage: the lower atmosphere.

    One manmade electrical effect power-line harmonic resonance causes
    fallout of charged particles from the Van Allen (radiation) belts,
    and the falling ions cause ice crystals which precipitate rain
    clouds.

    What about HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater
    is not much compared to the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP
    documents admit that thousandfold greater amounts of energy can be
    released in the ionosphere than injected. As with MacDonald's "key
    to geophysical warfare," "nonlinear" effects (described in the
    literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small input and large
    output.

    Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model
    is one way to look at the possible effect of multigigawatt pulsing
    of the ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain points, those parts of the
    ionosphere could react in surprising ways.

    Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are
    underneath relatively placid regions of the ionosphere compared to
    the dynamic movements nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That adds
    another uncertainty to HAARP: the unpredictable and lively upper
    atmosphere near the North Pole.

    HAARP experimenters do not impress common sense Alaskans such as
    Barbara Zickuhr, who says, "They're like boys playing with a sharp
    stick, finding a sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see
    what's going to happen."

    Could They Short-Circuit the Earth?

    Earth as a spherical electrical system is a fairly well-accepted
    model. However, those experimenters who want to make unnatural
    power connections between parts of this system might not be
    thinking of possible consequences. Electrical motors and generators
    can be caused to wobble when their circuits are affected. Could
    human activities cause a significant change in a planet's
    electrical circuit or electrical field? A paper in the respected
    journal Science deals with man-made ionization from radioactive
    materials, but perhaps it could also be studied with HAARP-type
    skybusters in mind: "For example, while changes in the Earth's
    electric field resulting from a solar flare modulating conductivity
    may have only a barely detectable effect on meteorology, the
    situation may be different in regard to electric field changes
    caused by man-made ionization."

    Meteorology, of course, is the study of the atmosphere and weather.
    Ionization is what happens when a higher level of power is zapped
    into atoms and knocks electrons off the atoms. The resulting
    charged particles are the stuff of HAARP. Paul Schaefer, commenting
    on HAARP-type technologies, says, "One look at the weather should
    tell us that we are on the wrong path."

    Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla
    Technology is about the military's plan to manipulate that
    which belongs to the world: the ionosphere. The arrogance of the
    United States government in this is not without precedent.
    Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar goals. More recently, China
    and France put their people's money to destructive use in
    underground nuclear tests. It was recently reported that the U.S.
    government had spent $3 trillion on its nuclear program since its
    beginnings in the 1940's. What new breakthroughs in life science
    could have been made with all the money spent on death?

    Begich, Manning and others believe that democracies need to be
    founded on openness rather than the secrecy which surrounds so much
    military science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary
    weapons could be used for healing and helping mankind. Because they
    are used in new weapons, discoveries are classified and suppressed.
    When they do appear in the work of other independent scientists,
    the new ideas are often frustrated or ridiculed, while military
    research laboratories continue to build their new machines for the
    killing fields.

    However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the
    military-industrial-academic-bureaucratic Goliath can be affected
    by the combined power of determined individuals and the alternative
    press. Becoming informed is the first step to empowerment.

    The book Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla
    Technology
    is available from Earthpulse Press for $14.95 plus
    postage and handling ($1.50 U.S.; $4 international).

    Dr. Nick Begich is an Anchorage, Alaska-based independent
    researcher and activist and former president of the Alaska
    Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage Council of Education.
    Jeane Manning is a reporter and editor residing in Vancouver,
    Canada. A decade of researching nonconventional energy technologies
    has culminated in her forthcoming book The Coming Energy Revolution (Avery Publishing
    Group, New York, 1996). She contributed to the book Suppressed Inventions and Other Discoveries
    (Auckland Institute of Technology Press, New Zealand). Begich and
    Manning are collaborating on the forthcoming book Towards a New Alchemy: The Incredible Inventions of
    Dr. Patrick Flanagan
    .

    source: http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/HAARP.htm

    n.b. This is an article from 1997, but still very valid.


    Last edited by TRANCOSO on Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:10 pm; edited 2 times in total
    lindabaker
    lindabaker


    Posts : 1385
    Join date : 2010-04-15
    Location : straight ahead

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  lindabaker Mon Aug 02, 2010 2:58 pm

    Transcoso: I'm wondering if you have the link handy to the Penn State scientists' article. (The braggarts.) I earned my degree there and I can tell you, the school has lots of donors from the private sector...don't we wish we could know who, exactly, is playing around there up in PA? Most people think Penn State is a government (state) school, but it is privately owned and operated...Linda
    TRANCOSO
    TRANCOSO


    Posts : 3930
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  TRANCOSO Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:13 pm

    lindabaker wrote:Transcoso: I'm wondering if you have the link handy to the Penn State scientists' article. (The braggarts.) I earned my degree there and I can tell you, the school has lots of donors from the private sector...don't we wish we could know who, exactly, is playing around there up in PA? Most people think Penn State is a government (state) school, but it is privately owned and operated...Linda
    No, I don't have the link handy, Linda.
    Are you doing allright?
    Was it HAARP?? 374937
    lindabaker
    lindabaker


    Posts : 1385
    Join date : 2010-04-15
    Location : straight ahead

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  lindabaker Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:19 pm

    Doing well, and thanks for asking. I can find the link myself, no prob. I went up north for a while to PA. Back in Georgia now, trying to keep cool. No oil smell in N. Georgia lately...we have had rains from the north and west. Rain from the Gulf is the worry...Is Haarp being used to push the weather systems, do you think? I just saw an article in CNN Money that features condos on the Atlantic coast that would cost less than a Toyota. Things are getting stranger by the moment. How's the Amsterdam?
    TRANCOSO
    TRANCOSO


    Posts : 3930
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  TRANCOSO Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:06 pm

    Amsterdam is great this time of the year. Half the city is on holidays abroad, so it's really nice & quiet,
    except in the centre of course.

    The biggest nuisance right now are tourists on bicycles, who think the street is a playground.

    For us a bicycle is the fastest way to go from A to B, but to those damned tourist it's a toy to play around with.

    They seem to think that the streets here are made of feathers & rubber & that they can't get injured if they fall on their faces.

    Tomorrow I'm going to Wiltshire, England, 'hunting' crop circles. (In the company of 3 very beautiful, naughty girls...) Was it HAARP?? Icon_wink
    I'm gonna write an article about it for a popular nationwide magazine.

    Linda, life is a bitch, but not for me!
    Was it HAARP?? Icon_biggrin
    Floyd
    Floyd


    Posts : 4104
    Join date : 2010-04-16

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  Floyd Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:10 pm

    TRANCOSO wrote:Amsterdam is great this time of the year. Half the city is on holidays abroad, so it's really nice & quiet,
    except in the centre of course.

    The biggest nuisance right now are tourists on bicycles, who think the street is a playground.

    For us a bicycle is the fastest way to go from A to B, but to those damned tourist it's a toy to play around with.

    They seem to think that the streets here are made of feathers & rubber & that they can't get injured if they fall on their faces.

    Tomorrow I'm going to Wiltshire, England, 'hunting' crop circles. (In the company of 3 very beautiful, naughty girls...) Was it HAARP?? Icon_wink
    I'm gonna write an article about it for a popular nationwide magazine.

    Linda, life is a bitch, but not for me!
    Was it HAARP?? Icon_biggrin

    Transc. Do you need any assistance for this trip! I could carry your pen for you
    or provide tea and sandwhiches for the ladies..nudge nudge wink wink Was it HAARP?? Icon_wink
    TRANCOSO
    TRANCOSO


    Posts : 3930
    Join date : 2010-04-10
    Location : AMSTERDAM

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  TRANCOSO Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:33 pm

    Floyd wrote:
    TRANCOSO wrote:Amsterdam is great this time of the year. Half the city is on holidays abroad, so it's really nice & quiet,
    except in the centre of course.

    The biggest nuisance right now are tourists on bicycles, who think the street is a playground.

    For us a bicycle is the fastest way to go from A to B, but to those damned tourist it's a toy to play around with.

    They seem to think that the streets here are made of feathers & rubber & that they can't get injured if they fall on their faces.

    Tomorrow I'm going to Wiltshire, England, 'hunting' crop circles. (In the company of 3 very beautiful, naughty girls...) Was it HAARP?? Icon_wink
    I'm gonna write an article about it for a popular nationwide magazine.

    Linda, life is a bitch, but not for me!
    Was it HAARP?? Icon_biggrin

    Transc. Do you need any assistance for this trip! I could carry your pen for you
    or provide tea and sandwhiches for the ladies..nudge nudge wink wink Was it HAARP?? Icon_wink
    Say no more!
    A wank is as good as a blind bat!
    sabina
    sabina


    Posts : 148
    Join date : 2010-05-09

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  sabina Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:23 am

    Iam sure about that you will have a lot of fun in Great Britian hunting cropcycles. Iam looking forward to your article I know it will become an interesting read . nice journey Was it HAARP?? Icon_sunny Was it HAARP?? Icon_sunny Was it HAARP?? Icon_sunny not too much rain
    Sabina
    mudra
    mudra


    Posts : 23210
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 69
    Location : belgium

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  mudra Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:29 pm

    Tour HAARP and the Ionospheric Heaters worldwide 3D Map & Details

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwvrzu918HE


    Arrow http://climateviewer.com/


    Link to the Haarp Univeristy : Arrow http://rezn8d.com/haarp/

    Love Always
    mudra
    mudra
    mudra


    Posts : 23210
    Join date : 2010-04-09
    Age : 69
    Location : belgium

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Re: Was it HAARP??

    Post  mudra Fri Jun 27, 2014 2:25 pm

    Although this is posted as a new video I believe I saw it before but I am not sure it has been posted yet in the Mists

    Weather weapons existed over 15 years testified USA Secretary Defense

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qM1PXon31U


    Love Always
    mudra
    Jenetta
    Jenetta


    Posts : 1978
    Join date : 2010-04-16
    Location : British Columbia Canada

    Was it HAARP?? Empty Was It HAARP?

    Post  Jenetta Fri Jun 27, 2014 11:45 pm

    Interesting how they start off the video by blaming Tesla for applying HAARP to negative military applications in future years.  Keep an ear out for the falsified spin. However some useful information in this video.

    _________________________________________
    As it is below; so it is above

      Current date/time is Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:35 am