tMoA

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
tMoA

~ The only Home on the Web You'll ever need ~

2 posters

    Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines

    Seashore
    Seashore


    Posts : 1551
    Join date : 2010-04-14
    Age : 77
    Location : Virginia, U.S.

    Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines Empty Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines

    Post  Seashore Tue Aug 10, 2021 8:16 am

    From Reclaim the Net:  Link

    Leader Dr Andrew Kaufman purposely let his medical license expire and found another, better way to make a living.  

    Big pharma controlled Western medicine does much harm to people in other ways besides vaccines.  

    I'm hoping we will have a revolution in health care as a result of increased awareness brought about by this fake pandemic.  
    Carol
    Carol
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 27749
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines Empty Re: Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines

    Post  Carol Tue Aug 10, 2021 12:30 pm


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9KnhUu7Ba4&t=2s

    Doctor calls out CDC and school board at school board meeting with truth!

    Transcript


    Guilty as charged.

    I’m Dr Dan Stock of 5777 West Seminar North McCordsville, Indiana. I’m to address your comments. Gee, it's hard
    to believe for 18 months into this and still having a problem. And I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we're doing things that are not useful and we're getting our sources of information from the NIH, State Board of Health and the CDC - who actually don't bother to read science before they do this.

    I'm actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I’m specially trained in immunology and inflammation. Regulation and everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

    So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses, they are spread by aerosol particles, which are small enough to go through every mask by the way. The literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we've presented to you has been given to the secretary.

    As a matter of fact it quotes at least three studies that sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact - even though the CDC and the NIH have chosen to avoid, to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.

    That is why you keep struggling with this is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of
    all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long
    waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter, or become deranged as has happened recently with these vaccines. And then they cause symptomatic disease because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs and this is very important point no one can make this virus go away.

    The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox where we could make a virus go away.

    Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing that learned to infect was humans. That's why we were able to make that virus go away.

    That will not happen with this anymore than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus, add no viral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs.

    So the reason you can't do this is because you're trying to do something which has already been tried and can't be done.

    Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine and I would hope this Board would start asking itself before it considers taking the advice of the CDC the NIH and the State Board of Health why we are doing things about this that we didn't do for the common cold influenza or respiratory syncytial virus - and then ask yourself why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don't do that.

    And to help you understand that you need to know the condition that is called antibody mediated viral enhancement.

    That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus, where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual - done the wrong way, which by cannot be done right for a respiratory virus. Which has a very low pathogenicity rate causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection.

    And that is why you're seeing an outbreak right now. In fact in that flash drive you're going to have coming to you and in the emails. with six extra. will be a study showing that 75 percent of people who had covet 19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak were fully vaccinated.

    Therefore there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated.

    You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones i support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection. In 2014 there was outbreak of mumps in the national hockey league.

    The only people who came down the symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status.

    Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines but a question that you should ask yourself knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual.

    Where did they get the disease and the answer was from the vaccinated individuals. NO vaccine prevents you from getting infection.

    You get infected, you shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens.

    You just don't get symptomatic from it.


    So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you've planned on get better by doing any of the things you're doing because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can't prevent it with a vaccine because they don't do the very thing you're wanting them to do.

    And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance.

    And instead, read the articles that are going to come on the email and are on this flash drive.

    And listen to the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counterfactual.

    And that's why you're still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going to make all of this go away but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of covet 19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest. By the way, the other thing that would be necessary any vaccine restriction to be considered, as if there were no other treatment available.

    And I can tell you, having treated over 15 COVID 19 patients, that between active loading with Vitamin D, Ivermectin and Zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital.

    And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D level greater than 55, your risk of Covid19 death will drop down to through one quarter of the population average for the United States. and there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that the show the same is true.

    So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D level Zinc taste test response and probably previous infection. Since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from COVID 19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all. No reduction in symptoms. No reduction in hospitalization. And suffer two to four times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.

    Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual.

    I don't blame this board for that because I know you aren't scientists and you thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience. And read what's on that data drive.

    And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that I will happily come back and sit with you individually.

    If you would like to explain the science behind this and if you're worried about being sued by somebody because you don't follow the guidance of the CDC in the NIH. I will tell you have a free pro bono expert testimony at your disposal. I will testify in defensive discord turning down all these recommendations for free at any time in any court. Thank you.


    _________________
    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol
    Carol
    Carol
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 27749
    Join date : 2010-04-07
    Location : Hawaii

    Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines Empty Re: Doctors warned that they could lose their license for contradicting CDC info on COVID treatments and vaccines

    Post  Carol Tue Aug 10, 2021 12:39 pm

    NIH: "COVID vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise recipients to more severe disease than if not vaxxed"


    "Results of the study

    COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

    Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications
    The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

    (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method,

    That covers any and all type of "vaccination" against coronaviruses.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/


    _________________
    What is life?
    It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset.

    With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol

      Current date/time is Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:49 pm