Egyptian Folklore II

first thing I want to point out is this....



http://www.eng.utah.edu/~nmcdonal/Tu...archReview.pdf

So if you were going to leave a coded message from the future you would definitely want to leave it before this period of 1900 B.C. right?

That tomb was before the advent of such cryptography in Egypt during the reign of Hatshepsut in 1473 B.C.

The tomb was discovered during the 1925-1927 excavations. So you have a discovery year to work with here and you have a time when Cryptography was not in use. Perfect for such an experiment.

burgundia wrote:Good to see you here again Brook. I have been thinking of you recently because of the situation in Syria and those words uttered by you relating to Syria.

Brook wrote:

"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it,

look before they cross the road..."

Stephen Hawking​

Brook wrote:

In this post I want to discuss Artemis and the "SIX" I got stuck on.

Artemis while utilizing a program is very real.  We've butted heads and I've questioned him at every turn.  Every time I do so he seems to validate the findings.  Even when my perception of them is incorrect.  He seems to make allowance for that and has guided me thus.

He's my snitch in time if you will.  He has provided/guided me with things I never knew existed.  I'm fairly certain it was he that somehow manipulated my computer that day to play that song the morning before my son died.

On several occasions before that day he often referred to the delicacy of my Emotional State which was to him very fragile...and he was VERY concerned with how I would deal with any emotional trauma.  Which often confused me until I realized after the day my son died was more than warranted.

Hello darkness, my old friend,
I've come to talk with you again,
Because a vision softly creeping,
Left its seeds while I was sleeping,
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence.




So, who is Artemis?  A program?  An Avatar?  A guide?

All of the above?

I briefly saw the real him in 2010 which was quite by accident on his part.  He has emotion as well and was expressing something that left him with emotion which allowed the brief view.  A program with emotion?  When I saw him for that brief moment I vaguely recognized him.  He was a man.  Not a bird head for the briefest of moments.

While he is integrated to me and attached like a thread.  He is not me.  He NEVER leaves my side!  He is quite different than me.  He is NOT my higher self.  He also loves me very much as do the other three.  Filled with compassion and concern in this reveal of their existence to "take over from here".

"Hear my words that I might teach you.
Take my arms that I might reach you."



And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made.
And the SIGN flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming.




Artemis is a Greek name with the body of an Egyptian man and the head of a bird.  He looks something like this when I saw a tear from his bird head eye after that day:



This image is going to be discussed more from number six.  However...Artemis guided me to something I was not aware of until recently while reviewing one and the same.  Above I wrote before learning this:

The Nine Universal Principles.

Where I immediately connect the Ennead:  In Greek means  collection of nine things

The Egyptian Ennead are Nine Deities.

Then I get stuck on number 6 and all kinds of information floods in.

A Greek/Egyptian Guides me to another number 6 of great significance.

~


The Six Enneads

By Plotinus a Greek philosopher

Written 250 A.C.E.

http://sacred-texts.com/cla/plotenn/index.htm

http://classics.mit.edu/Plotinus/enneads.4.fourth.html

First Tractate

ON THE ESSENCE OF THE SOUL

1. In the Intellectual Kosmos dwells Authentic Essence, with the Intellectual-Principle [Divine Mind] as the noblest of its content, but containing also souls, since every soul in this lower sphere has come thence: that is the world of unembodied spirits while to our world belong those that have entered body and undergone bodily division.

There the Intellectual-Principle is a concentrated all- nothing of it distinguished or divided- and in that kosmos of unity all souls are concentrated also, with no spatial discrimination.

But there is a difference:
The Intellectual-Principle is for ever repugnant to distinction and to partition. Soul, there without distinction and partition, has yet a nature lending itself to divisional existence: its division is secession, entry into body.

In view of this seceding and the ensuing partition we may legitimately speak of it as a partible thing.

But if so, how can it still be described as indivisible?
In that the secession is not of the soul entire; something of it holds its ground, that in it which recoils from separate existence.

The entity, therefore, described as "consisting of the undivided soul and of the soul divided among bodies," contains a soul which is at once above and below, attached to the Supreme and yet reaching down to this sphere, like a radius from a center.

Thus it is that, entering this realm, it possesses still the vision inherent to that superior phase in virtue of which it unchangingly maintains its integral nature. Even here it is not exclusively the partible soul: it is still the impartible as well: what in it knows partition is parted without partibility; undivided as giving itself to the entire body, a whole to a whole, it is divided as being effective in every part.

~

Needless to say Artemis has sent me off my chair and to the floor once again!



Happy reading!

I'm not done with 6 just yet.  In fact I'm just beginning...

As it was told to me it would be a lot like Christmas morning opening presents when I started to discover what was in this room/tomb of mine where this scroll exists.

No Brook, no personal address at all was intended and yes I took notice of aspects I disagree with you, such as the semantics associated say with 'thout', whilst in general having some agreement with other descriptors regarding particular dates and synchronicities to do with 'ptb sacrifices' and so on.
However, and you might have noticed, certain developments which both of us realise underpin experienced reality on this planet both physical and mental, have shifted my focus from the potential solution and outcomes in a projectable future towards an emphasis towards a war of information, ideology and philosophy which must be fought.

In other words our disagreements regarding particular details in our respective cosmological interpretations fade in importance as to this real danger to this shared common legacy of our histories. And yes I am calling a spade a spade in resisting a number of agendas masquerading under many labels from left-or rightwing politics to social justice and 'ptb perception engineering' to alternative sciences and alternative media and counter cultures.
As you can see on this forum and wherever you interact with the 'real world' of a planetary society; the vast majority of so called humans has maneuvered itself into ideological and self-opinionated corners of what in Judeo-Christian labelings is simply called 'self-righteousness'.
The idea of the nabser and political ideologue of 'surrender to the greater universal self' say, has become a worship of the individual self, which by its own definition, cannot be as informed or non biased as a form of 'cosmic integration' and assimilation with this 'greater self'.
The opinionated individual has succeeded to construct hisher own glass house of individual supremacy and autonomy, in which shehe justifies hisher often rather under-and misinformed factual information, history and concepts in whatever form of interaction shehe finds appropriate to defend their 'substance lacking' discourses.

The word 'objective truth' has become a 'no go zone' just as have original symbols such as 'Zion the Nation Israel' and 'Jesus as the core of peace emphasizing world religion' and as far removed from political christianity, papal and other ecclesiastical institutions, as is the utterly obscene and obnoxious label of calling political islam a religion of peace.

And so a politically impartial and a religiously impartial vox populi has become dulled and suppressed by the self-obsessed individual worshipping himherself on the altar of relative and self-centered 'truth'. It is this hijacking of the 'individualistic supremacy of opinion', unaffiliated with any form of historical self awareness and responsibility, which has allowed a metaphysical vacuum to become created as a cultural memeplex or 'all pervading thoughtform' of personal self-relativism.

And so you could say, that 'my' agenda is no longer 'personal' but 'impersonal' in a greater context of a global clash of memeperplexification. Perhaps it would also serve your individual contexts better to become less responsive to 'personal' attacks and characterisations from the 'know it betters', and focus on the universal idiom of 'non-opinionated factual truth'.

No Brook, no personal address at all was intended and yes I took notice of aspects I disagree with you, such as the semantics associated say with 'thout', whilst in general having some agreement with other descriptors regarding particular dates and synchronicities to do with 'ptb sacrifices' and so on.
However, and you might have noticed, certain developments which both of us realise underpin experienced reality on this planet both physical and mental, have shifted my focus from the potential solution and outcomes in a projectable future towards an emphasis towards a war of information, ideology and philosophy which must be fought.

In other words our disagreements regarding particular details in our respective cosmological interpretations fade in importance as to this real danger to this shared common legacy of our histories. And yes I am calling a spade a spade in resisting a number of agendas masquerading under many labels from left-or rightwing politics to social justice and 'ptb perception engineering' to alternative sciences and alternative media and counter cultures.
As you can see on this forum and wherever you interact with the 'real world' of a planetary society; the vast majority of so called humans has maneuvered itself into ideological and self-opinionated corners of what in Judeo-Christian labelings is simply called 'self-righteousness'.
The idea of the nabser and political ideologue of 'surrender to the greater universal self' say, has become a worship of the individual self, which by its own definition, cannot be as informed or non biased as a form of 'cosmic integration' and assimilation with this 'greater self'.
The opinionated individual has succeeded to construct hisher own glass house of individual supremacy and autonomy, in which shehe justifies hisher often rather under-and misinformed factual information, history and concepts in whatever form of interaction shehe finds appropriate to defend their 'substance lacking' discourses.

The word 'objective truth' has become a 'no go zone' just as have original symbols such as 'Zion the Nation Israel' and 'Jesus as the core of peace emphasizing world religion' and as far removed from political christianity, papal and other ecclesiastical institutions, as is the utterly obscene and obnoxious label of calling political islam a religion of peace.

When a person gives their allegiance to an external belief structure, they may go in one of several directions. First, they often will become very rigid in their allegiance to the organization or structure to which they have committed. This type of conformity can be seen through various forms of fundamentalism -- religious, political, psychological systems, etc.

Second, they may present as being very committed to a belief systems or organization, but they feel very comfortable bending the rules where it does fit their desires. It becomes easy to bend the rules because they are not really committed to the underlying values system. However, when a person is deeply committed to authentic moral or value principles, they are less willing to act in ways which contradict these principles. The principles are authentic.

Brook wrote:

No Brook, no personal address at all was intended and yes I took notice of aspects I disagree with you, such as the semantics associated say with 'thout', whilst in general having some agreement with other descriptors regarding particular dates and synchronicities to do with 'ptb sacrifices' and so on.
However, and you might have noticed, certain developments which both of us realise underpin experienced reality on this planet both physical and mental, have shifted my focus from the potential solution and outcomes in a projectable future towards an emphasis towards a war of information, ideology and philosophy which must be fought.

In other words our disagreements regarding particular details in our respective cosmological interpretations fade in importance as to this real danger to this shared common legacy of our histories. And yes I am calling a spade a spade in resisting a number of agendas masquerading under many labels from left-or rightwing politics to social justice and 'ptb perception engineering' to alternative sciences and alternative media and counter cultures.
As you can see on this forum and wherever you interact with the 'real world' of a planetary society; the vast majority of so called humans has maneuvered itself into ideological and self-opinionated corners of what in Judeo-Christian labelings is simply called 'self-righteousness'.
The idea of the nabser and political ideologue of 'surrender to the greater universal self' say, has become a worship of the individual self, which by its own definition, cannot be as informed or non biased as a form of 'cosmic integration' and assimilation with this 'greater self'.
The opinionated individual has succeeded to construct hisher own glass house of individual supremacy and autonomy, in which shehe justifies hisher often rather under-and misinformed factual information, history and concepts in whatever form of interaction shehe finds appropriate to defend their 'substance lacking' discourses.

The word 'objective truth' has become a 'no go zone' just as have original symbols such as 'Zion the Nation Israel' and 'Jesus as the core of peace emphasizing world religion' and as far removed from political christianity, papal and other ecclesiastical institutions, as is the utterly obscene and obnoxious label of calling political islam a religion of peace.

Now...on to the main body of your post which was very well received.

While yes, you and I have disagreed several times we actually agree more than not.  As long as I've known you I'm well aware you are a very well Educated man.  Thus leaning on the facts in most cases and not the expanded nonsense which has been prevailing for quite some time now.  I actually stopped watching youtube videos on the subjects as they are highly edited with extreme prejudice. Which is why I noted I did not watch that video but focused on that title and it triggered my 'affliction' which some might call a gift and I certainly DO NOT!  It sucks!  I don't like it..I don't want it yet I have to live with it.  Do you really think I relished seeing my sons funeral before he died? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!  Or for that matter his fathers death when I was 8 years old?  What child would want that!

I think you know me well enough by now that I can say these things to you and you will understand what I'm saying.

You certainly know I'm a long time advocate against WAR and Poverty given my mothers fame in that area and her influence.  I'm also a bit of an existentialist at heart which is often given to sheer disappointment in idealism.  If only!

You remember about a year ago here on the Mists I had this blow out over antisemitism and sheer prejudice?  I think you even intervened at some point if I recall. Well that will never change within me.  

I've always believed that intention goes a long way....so does faith which often go hand in hand.  Now...I'm just a no body and like it that way because it relieves me of the burdens to have to come up with answers all the time.  I certainly do not have them in any case.  I learned a long time ago when one thinks they have them...they cease to learn.  That is an easy equation!

I am also deeply disturbed by what I'm seeing in the information, ideology and philosophy as do you.  It's like watching a movie in many respects.  I have noticed with much of the ideology and information comes great philosophical manipulation.  which coming from that existential pov I added to that thread that guy attacked me for.  Was it something I said?    LOL  

Id like to quote that part if I may:

When a person gives their allegiance to an external belief structure, they may go in one of several directions. First, they often will become very rigid in their allegiance to the organization or structure to which they have committed. This type of conformity can be seen through various forms of fundamentalism -- religious, political, psychological systems, etc.

Second, they may present as being very committed to a belief systems or organization, but they feel very comfortable bending the rules where it does fit their desires. It becomes easy to bend the rules because they are not really committed to the underlying values system. However, when a person is deeply committed to authentic moral or value principles, they are less willing to act in ways which contradict these principles. The principles are authentic.

I think you and I both witness a bit of that here lately no?  I know I have.

So what are you left with?  

The physics of cause and effect.  Your personal expertise no?

Personally Tony I would not know where to begin to solve such a crisis as we are seeing today.  But the physics of cause and effect do apply and it's quite disturbing.

I do however see it as a massive ritualistic event to beat them all and it's coming to a theater near you unless something gets done.  I know I won't rely on the so called hero's of today that claim to have it all handled on the interweb savior programs...I do think it needs addressing.

But where to begin without conflict? The who, when and where is the choice that must be decided and it scares the hell out of me who makes that decision!  I don't need another savior with a damned sword in his hand that's for sure!

Thank you Tony for the provocative post it provoked much thought/thoth....  (just kidding on the Thoth thing but I had to add that)

I think you and I both witness a bit of that here lately no?  I know I have.

So what are you left with?  

The physics of cause and effect.  Your personal expertise no?

Personally Tony I would not know where to begin to solve such a crisis as we are seeing today.  But the physics of cause and effect do apply and it's quite disturbing.

I do however see it as a massive ritualistic event to beat them all and it's coming to a theater near you unless something gets done.  I know I won't rely on the so called hero's of today that claim to have it all handled on the interweb savior programs...I do think it needs addressing.

But where to begin without conflict? The who, when and where is the choice that must be decided and it scares the hell out of me who makes that decision!  I don't need another savior with a damned sword in his hand that's for sure!

Ephesians 6:12

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

shiloh wrote:

Brook wrote:

No Brook, no personal address at all was intended and yes I took notice of aspects I disagree with you, such as the semantics associated say with 'thout', whilst in general having some agreement with other descriptors regarding particular dates and synchronicities to do with 'ptb sacrifices' and so on.
However, and you might have noticed, certain developments which both of us realise underpin experienced reality on this planet both physical and mental, have shifted my focus from the potential solution and outcomes in a projectable future towards an emphasis towards a war of information, ideology and philosophy which must be fought.

In other words our disagreements regarding particular details in our respective cosmological interpretations fade in importance as to this real danger to this shared common legacy of our histories. And yes I am calling a spade a spade in resisting a number of agendas masquerading under many labels from left-or rightwing politics to social justice and 'ptb perception engineering' to alternative sciences and alternative media and counter cultures.
As you can see on this forum and wherever you interact with the 'real world' of a planetary society; the vast majority of so called humans has maneuvered itself into ideological and self-opinionated corners of what in Judeo-Christian labelings is simply called 'self-righteousness'.
The idea of the nabser and political ideologue of 'surrender to the greater universal self' say, has become a worship of the individual self, which by its own definition, cannot be as informed or non biased as a form of 'cosmic integration' and assimilation with this 'greater self'.
The opinionated individual has succeeded to construct hisher own glass house of individual supremacy and autonomy, in which shehe justifies hisher often rather under-and misinformed factual information, history and concepts in whatever form of interaction shehe finds appropriate to defend their 'substance lacking' discourses.

The word 'objective truth' has become a 'no go zone' just as have original symbols such as 'Zion the Nation Israel' and 'Jesus as the core of peace emphasizing world religion' and as far removed from political christianity, papal and other ecclesiastical institutions, as is the utterly obscene and obnoxious label of calling political islam a religion of peace.

Now...on to the main body of your post which was very well received.

While yes, you and I have disagreed several times we actually agree more than not.  As long as I've known you I'm well aware you are a very well Educated man.  Thus leaning on the facts in most cases and not the expanded nonsense which has been prevailing for quite some time now.  I actually stopped watching youtube videos on the subjects as they are highly edited with extreme prejudice. Which is why I noted I did not watch that video but focused on that title and it triggered my 'affliction' which some might call a gift and I certainly DO NOT!  It sucks!  I don't like it..I don't want it yet I have to live with it.  Do you really think I relished seeing my sons funeral before he died? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!  Or for that matter his fathers death when I was 8 years old?  What child would want that!

I think you know me well enough by now that I can say these things to you and you will understand what I'm saying.

You certainly know I'm a long time advocate against WAR and Poverty given my mothers fame in that area and her influence.  I'm also a bit of an existentialist at heart which is often given to sheer disappointment in idealism.  If only!

You remember about a year ago here on the Mists I had this blow out over antisemitism and sheer prejudice?  I think you even intervened at some point if I recall. Well that will never change within me.  

I've always believed that intention goes a long way....so does faith which often go hand in hand.  Now...I'm just a no body and like it that way because it relieves me of the burdens to have to come up with answers all the time.  I certainly do not have them in any case.  I learned a long time ago when one thinks they have them...they cease to learn.  That is an easy equation!

I am also deeply disturbed by what I'm seeing in the information, ideology and philosophy as do you.  It's like watching a movie in many respects.  I have noticed with much of the ideology and information comes great philosophical manipulation.  which coming from that existential pov I added to that thread that guy attacked me for.  Was it something I said?    LOL  

Id like to quote that part if I may:

When a person gives their allegiance to an external belief structure, they may go in one of several directions. First, they often will become very rigid in their allegiance to the organization or structure to which they have committed. This type of conformity can be seen through various forms of fundamentalism -- religious, political, psychological systems, etc.

Second, they may present as being very committed to a belief systems or organization, but they feel very comfortable bending the rules where it does fit their desires. It becomes easy to bend the rules because they are not really committed to the underlying values system. However, when a person is deeply committed to authentic moral or value principles, they are less willing to act in ways which contradict these principles. The principles are authentic.

I think you and I both witness a bit of that here lately no?  I know I have.

So what are you left with?  

The physics of cause and effect.  Your personal expertise no?

Personally Tony I would not know where to begin to solve such a crisis as we are seeing today.  But the physics of cause and effect do apply and it's quite disturbing.

I do however see it as a massive ritualistic event to beat them all and it's coming to a theater near you unless something gets done.  I know I won't rely on the so called hero's of today that claim to have it all handled on the interweb savior programs...I do think it needs addressing.

But where to begin without conflict? The who, when and where is the choice that must be decided and it scares the hell out of me who makes that decision!  I don't need another savior with a damned sword in his hand that's for sure!

Thank you Tony for the provocative post it provoked much thought/thoth....  (just kidding on the Thoth thing but I had to add that)

A nice reply Brook and fully from the heart. I can see the real you indeed and it paints a universal panorama of you, well suited to a new world which must eventuate. Perhaps in our physical presence we might be able to accentuate.

I remember the anti-Semitic response I shared
This reply was of course undertaken from my usual position of presenting factual information with emotitve stimuli  subdued. But a number of perceptions, even from my fact based and scientific position have changed since the Paris attacks. In a manner of expression, I have changed my position on the entire construct at the core of forums, such as this one - the so called NWO of the elitists, might those be secret quasi religious cults or 'illuminati' or the lucis trust or the Bilderbergers or Bohemian grove's skullduggeries.

I received a number of impressions, call, them dreams or inspirational messages or whatever. It does not matter. What matters is that certain new information can elucidate even balanced and rational unemotional perspectives into a greater realization of the factual data which was there before and ubiquitously available to anyone considering this data.
The major 'illumination' in my data base became the metaphysical agenda beyond any so called political or secular or NWO agenda I hitherto considered the major influencing factor in the present global situation.

On this forum and similar ones, the manouvers and agendas of the NWO, call them banksters (which they are indeed) or 'political globalisators' or 'economic investors' and 'alien conspirators' and so on becomes the be it and is all for the 'alternatives' I often collect under the label of the nabser, IF their counter agendas rest on half witted hear say and repetition of simplistic stereotyped labels placed on whatever 'scarecrow' they nabs mindedness conjures from its juxtaposed fantasy world.

This scripture code so describes the agenda behind the agenda rather well and also point to the core of your questions regarding a solution to the situs quo. And your expressed sentiments do strike at the heart of the matter;

I think you and I both witness a bit of that here lately no?  I know I have.

So what are you left with?  

The physics of cause and effect.  Your personal expertise no?

Personally Tony I would not know where to begin to solve such a crisis as we are seeing today.  But the physics of cause and effect do apply and it's quite disturbing.

I do however see it as a massive ritualistic event to beat them all and it's coming to a theater near you unless something gets done.  I know I won't rely on the so called hero's of today that claim to have it all handled on the interweb savior programs...I do think it needs addressing.

But where to begin without conflict? The who, when and where is the choice that must be decided and it scares the hell out of me who makes that decision!  I don't need another savior with a damned sword in his hand that's for sure!

Ephesians 6:12

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

So disregarding any prevalent hatred for anything associated with Christianity or, Jesus or Paul or its physical political manifestations in organized religion; and considering this code  relative only to its content, one can easily find, that a completely non-religious and secular  'evil ET' conspiracy with the 'ptb' can as easily become identified with this code, as can a more orthodox interpretation of associating this 'spiritual wickedness' with some sort of demonic or devilish existence as would have been engaged at the times when the code was constructed.

Now you perhaps know what my 'scientific' translation for this 'spiritual wickedness' becomes - memeplexes created not by ETs from outer space but by the 'integrated ETs' of the inner space, and a space you might call the universal soul native to anyone incarnated in this planetary realm.
And this 'Invasion from Within' is in fact then related to cause and effect, as you propositioned and subsequently subject to scientific and rational analysis and examination.

And this is of course what becomes a unifying force between reasoning, sufficiently educated and informed minds such as  ours. Words are symbols and letters, which relate to the 'high places' in terms of whatever a 'higher dimensional' metaphysical reality can create. And those creation are as real in those realms, as are the cause and effect outcomes in the say lower dimensional realms.
So the fantasies of the nabsers form a particular realism in a direct correspondence of how deep or thorough those fantasy creations are made manifest in the worlds of the cause and effect, ergo the strength and conviction of the believers in the fantasies.
Then, and this is a focus, the difference between a nabser believing in the draconian invasion from the Orion starsytem and the imminent arrival of Nibiru and the belief by the bankster of creating the Amero then absorbing the Euro and the Denar in fiscal oligarchies becomes almost superfluous, as the belief in the economic pillars of the culture or society differs from the belief in political or philosophical pillars only in the semiotiks, symbols and archetypes used to construct those edifices of the cultures and subcultures.

You know that this is what I mean with memeperplexification or the reality of created thoughtforms, fed and supported by their own creators, namely the nabser and the oabser - bullshyters of the 'Old World' memeplexes and thought systems and those of the 'New World'.

So what is the solution?
The solution is to confront the created thoughtforms by the believers not in the realm of their manifestation, but in the realm of the 'high spiritual places' and to do that one must of course be able to enter those worlds.
To confront political islam, anti-Semitism, quasiscience or any of the many substance and data lacking memeplexes of the old human world will of course require a resistance memeplex to the thoughtform or belief system confronted.
But this 'war of the minds' and ideas will prove insufficient to 'destroy' whatever memeplex is considered the 'for or against' in say the 'warring parties'.

Any memeplex created cannot become uncreated, but must be rendered impotent as a memeplex.
In practical term and as an example, this could become the exposure and uncovering of political islam and its prophet and deity thorough historical, scientific and logical evidence.
Iow, when ordinary muslims begin to disassociate themselves from the believer memes they find themselves entrapped in, then the exbeliever muslim will actually become 'moderate' and rational due to hisher cessation of feeding the thoughtform labelled islam.
One could say that a memeplex  can become 'unwelcome' in the creator or cocreator modality of the incarnated universal human and so a previously fed memeplex will literally starve itself into an effective form of nonexistence in  the world of cause and effect.
The islam memeplex in this exemplar will continue to exist in the 'high spiritual places' but will become integrated into the memory collective of the universe as a memory of 'how it was'.

I'll end here for now.  Thank you for your commentary Brook.

Brook wrote:ODM,

14 videos?

Would you be so kind as to cut/edit that to a reasonable amount...say two or three?

 That is a bit excessive and we get the idea.

Thanks in advance,

Brook

Any memeplex created cannot become uncreated, but must be rendered impotent as a memeplex.
In practical term and as an example, this could become the exposure and uncovering of political islam and its prophet and deity thorough historical, scientific and logical evidence.
Iow, when ordinary muslims begin to disassociate themselves from the believer memes they find themselves entrapped in, then the exbeliever muslim will actually become 'moderate' and rational due to hisher cessation of feeding the thoughtform labelled islam.

One could say that a memeplex  can become 'unwelcome' in the creator or cocreator modality of the incarnated universal human and so a previously fed memeplex will literally starve itself into an effective form of nonexistence in  the world of cause and effect.
The islam memeplex in this exemplar will continue to exist in the 'high spiritual places' but will become integrated into the memory collective of the universe as a memory of 'how it was'.

integrated into the memory collective of the universe as a memory of 'how it was'.

One could say that a memeplex  can become 'unwelcome' in the creator or cocreator modality of the incarnated universal human and so a previously fed memeplex will literally starve itself into an effective form of nonexistence in  the world of cause and effect.

Brook wrote:Thank you ODM....I know you meant well, but my computer kept lagging when I opened the thread from all the videos.  



Tony,

Meant to answer you today but man what a day I've had.  I did the silliest thing!  I locked my keys in my car and had to way for roadside assistance.  Then when they got there they didn't want to help me because I have one of those cars that is impossible to get into without a locksmith unless you break the window which was not on my list of things to do....hence...hurry up and wait!



Argh!  By the time I got back I still had a million things to do before I could get to it.


So.....

I was intrigued by this first of all:

Any memeplex created cannot become uncreated, but must be rendered impotent as a memeplex.
In practical term and as an example, this could become the exposure and uncovering of political islam and its prophet and deity thorough historical, scientific and logical evidence.
Iow, when ordinary muslims begin to disassociate themselves from the believer memes they find themselves entrapped in, then the exbeliever muslim will actually become 'moderate' and rational due to hisher cessation of feeding the thoughtform labelled islam.

One could say that a memeplex  can become 'unwelcome' in the creator or cocreator modality of the incarnated universal human and so a previously fed memeplex will literally starve itself into an effective form of nonexistence in  the world of cause and effect.
The islam memeplex in this exemplar will continue to exist in the 'high spiritual places' but will become integrated into the memory collective of the universe as a memory of 'how it was'.

Yes..this is simple...Information stored I totally understand it never leaves...this is actually physics no?

integrated into the memory collective of the universe as a memory of 'how it was'.

But this...

One could say that a memeplex  can become 'unwelcome' in the creator or cocreator modality of the incarnated universal human and so a previously fed memeplex will literally starve itself into an effective form of nonexistence in  the world of cause and effect.

So... you make the memeplex unwelcome and starve the current one...this makes sense.  But aren't we back to square one?  That would how?  How would/could that be achieved?

Have you contemplated that?  It seems to me that would be one big challenge.  But worth some thought as to some kind of implementation no?



Anyhow give it a thought and get back to me and some of that other part deserves a skype real soon....it's been awhile after all...

I just got hold of a friend of ours and found out she's been ill.  We've been playing tag missing each other.  I actually wanted to get in touch via her.  Perhaps when she gets my message we can hook up soon.  It would be a pleasure.

Until then give what I just wrote a thought...

So... you make the memeplex unwelcome and starve the current one...this makes sense.  But aren't we back to square one?  That would how?  How would/could that be achieved?

Have you contemplated that?  It seems to me that would be one big challenge.  But worth some thought as to some kind of implementation no?