http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=big-bang-or-big-bounce
Key Concepts: * Einstein’s general theory of
relativity says that the universe began with the big bang singularity, a
moment when all the matter we see was concentrated at a single point of
infinite density. But the theory does not capture the fine, quantum
structure of spacetime, which limits how tightly matter can be
concentrated and how strong gravity can become. To figure out what
really happened, physicists need a quantum theory of gravity.
* According to one candidate for such a theory, loop quantum
gravity, space is subdivided into “atoms” of volume and has a finite
capacity to store matter and energy, thereby preventing true
singularities from existing.
* If so, time may have extended before the bang. The prebang
universe may have undergone a catastrophic implosion that reached a
point of maximum density and then reversed. In short, a big crunch may
have led to a big bounce and then to the big bang.
Atoms are now such a commonplace idea that it is hard to remember how
radical they used to seem. When scientists first hypothesized atoms
centuries ago, they despaired of ever observing anything so small, and
many questioned whether the concept of atoms could even be called
scientific. Gradually, however, evidence for atoms accumulated and
reached a tipping point with Albert Einstein’s 1905 analysis of Brownian
motion, the random jittering of dust grains in a fluid. Even then, it
took another 20 years for physicists to develop a theory explaining
atoms—namely, quantum mechanics—and another 30 for physicist Erwin
Müller to make the first microscope images of them. Today entire
industries are based on the characteristic properties of atomic matter.
Physicists’ understanding of the composition of space and time is
following a similar path, but several steps behind. Just as the behavior
of materials indicates that they consist of atoms, the behavior of
space and time suggests that they, too, have some fine-scale
structure—either a mosaic of spacetime “atoms” or some other filigree
work. Material atoms are the smallest indivisible units of chemical
compounds; similarly, the putative space atoms are the smallest
indivisible units of distance. They are generally thought to be about 10
–35 meter in size, far too tiny to be seen by today’s most powerful
instruments, which probe distances as short as 10 –18 meter.
Consequently, many scientists question whether the concept of atomic
spacetime can even be called scientific. Undeterred, other researchers
are coming up with possible ways to detect such atoms indirectly.
----------more at link
I believe this plane of existence is composed just like an atom as well.
It seems like there is a Universal architecture that is huge (the
solar system, Universe), to the smallest particles we know starting with
the atom. No matter what, I know I am 'here' and 'now' and however the
Universe is built, no matter how fascinating this subject is, I exist
with the rest of the world, and my existence depends on the rest of the
world, therefore, all of our existences are dependent on one another,
just like the Universe is dependent on it's architecture. So, with that
said, I feel we all have a responsibility to help the world in one way
or more and that world peace is possible with the collective
consciousnesses of all people now living. namaste
http://current.com/green/89366564_big-bang-or-big-bounce-new-theory-on-the-universes-birth.htm
One of the biggest problems of the Big Band theory is from where the energy for the bang was comming from
with this new theory that problem gets resolved, there was an implossion and then a explossion?
Of course this new theory may make all others redundant as it is often the case, like the one from the new shutting star Nassim Haramein that has the problem of explaining where the energy came from, why the universe expanded so quickly (inflation theory) and what is black matter (matter that we do not know what it is
) . A theory is just that a theory
Love
Love
Key Concepts: * Einstein’s general theory of
relativity says that the universe began with the big bang singularity, a
moment when all the matter we see was concentrated at a single point of
infinite density. But the theory does not capture the fine, quantum
structure of spacetime, which limits how tightly matter can be
concentrated and how strong gravity can become. To figure out what
really happened, physicists need a quantum theory of gravity.
* According to one candidate for such a theory, loop quantum
gravity, space is subdivided into “atoms” of volume and has a finite
capacity to store matter and energy, thereby preventing true
singularities from existing.
* If so, time may have extended before the bang. The prebang
universe may have undergone a catastrophic implosion that reached a
point of maximum density and then reversed. In short, a big crunch may
have led to a big bounce and then to the big bang.
Atoms are now such a commonplace idea that it is hard to remember how
radical they used to seem. When scientists first hypothesized atoms
centuries ago, they despaired of ever observing anything so small, and
many questioned whether the concept of atoms could even be called
scientific. Gradually, however, evidence for atoms accumulated and
reached a tipping point with Albert Einstein’s 1905 analysis of Brownian
motion, the random jittering of dust grains in a fluid. Even then, it
took another 20 years for physicists to develop a theory explaining
atoms—namely, quantum mechanics—and another 30 for physicist Erwin
Müller to make the first microscope images of them. Today entire
industries are based on the characteristic properties of atomic matter.
Physicists’ understanding of the composition of space and time is
following a similar path, but several steps behind. Just as the behavior
of materials indicates that they consist of atoms, the behavior of
space and time suggests that they, too, have some fine-scale
structure—either a mosaic of spacetime “atoms” or some other filigree
work. Material atoms are the smallest indivisible units of chemical
compounds; similarly, the putative space atoms are the smallest
indivisible units of distance. They are generally thought to be about 10
–35 meter in size, far too tiny to be seen by today’s most powerful
instruments, which probe distances as short as 10 –18 meter.
Consequently, many scientists question whether the concept of atomic
spacetime can even be called scientific. Undeterred, other researchers
are coming up with possible ways to detect such atoms indirectly.
----------more at link
I believe this plane of existence is composed just like an atom as well.
It seems like there is a Universal architecture that is huge (the
solar system, Universe), to the smallest particles we know starting with
the atom. No matter what, I know I am 'here' and 'now' and however the
Universe is built, no matter how fascinating this subject is, I exist
with the rest of the world, and my existence depends on the rest of the
world, therefore, all of our existences are dependent on one another,
just like the Universe is dependent on it's architecture. So, with that
said, I feel we all have a responsibility to help the world in one way
or more and that world peace is possible with the collective
consciousnesses of all people now living. namaste
http://current.com/green/89366564_big-bang-or-big-bounce-new-theory-on-the-universes-birth.htm
One of the biggest problems of the Big Band theory is from where the energy for the bang was comming from
with this new theory that problem gets resolved, there was an implossion and then a explossion?Of course this new theory may make all others redundant as it is often the case, like the one from the new shutting star Nassim Haramein that has the problem of explaining where the energy came from, why the universe expanded so quickly (inflation theory) and what is black matter (matter that we do not know what it is
) . A theory is just that a theoryLove
Love
