The red pill Trinity.... 
"A leader is best when people barely know he exists, when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves". Lao Tzu
------------------- your name ---------------------------
From Judge Anna today.... What is in a NAME?
An Appeal for Pesach (Passover) What is in a NAME? Let's begin with the Bible, the source of the Law of the Land throughout the Western World, and let's begin with the most important name of all, the name of God. God doesn't have a name. People have made up various excuses for this fact, but the scripture also quite clearly tells us the same. "I Am That I Am" is a four-letter description. There are 72 other three-letter descriptions known as "names of God" that each describe another defining characteristic of God, so that taken on the whole, we know far more about the nature and character of God than we could ever know from a name----but the fact remains that God does not have "a" name. Neither do God's children. This is on purpose. In Revelation we are told that we will be given names, but as such, we have no names now --- at least no names known to mortal man. What??? We have no names? That's right, we have no names. As children of God we are spirits inhabiting flesh, and like our Father, we have no names, only descriptions. This is why for many hundreds of years in all the venues of Law of the Land, people are described: "Anne of Green Gables", "Henry of Warwick", "Elizabeth of Ardennes", "George by the Battlements", "Eleanora of Bailford, Bickford, and Main" ---- or, "Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia Riezinger of (von) Reitzenstein of (von) Lettow before (Vor) Beck." So if we have no names, what are these things we use day to day to call each other to breakfast? They are the Mark of the Beast. Why are they the Mark of the Beast? Because only Beasts (animals) have names. Adam was not given the right nor the assignment to name people. He was tasked to name animals and things only. So when a man gives another man a name, he is implying that the man receiving the name is (a) an animal or (b) a thing--- like a corporation. Well, clearly, in some sense, a man is an animal, a mammal, and recognizable as such and as an animal he can be named. If he acts as a corporation--- a thing ---- he can also be named. So it is that under the Law of the Sea, men have been given names as animals and treated as such; until very recent times the Admiralty sections of the Public Law (notably Title 7) have freely admitted that men are considered "land assets" and "animals". Hence, a name applied to a man is literally "the mark of the Beast". For many centuries the convention of describing people instead of naming them kept confusion at a minimum, but toward the middle of the nineteenth century the age-old practice based on Biblical Law began to be undermined. Why? Administrative convenience. It was easier to standardize conventions and religious concerns were waived. The name John Brown is after all just an abbreviation of the lawful name "John of the House Brown" and John Henry Brown is just an abbreviation of the lawful name "John who has taken the name Henry of the House Brown". Why have to write all that out and explain what it means? Doesn't everyone know that already? Apparently not.
------------
Instead, the lawful description of living people became confused with the Trade Names they were accostumed to using in business transactions. "John Henry Brown" the foreshortened and standardized description of the living man was, at least visually, the same as John Henry Brown, the Trade Name of that same man. So the "descriptive name" and the "Trade Name" became distinguishable only by context or explicit definition, such as, "for the purposes of this document "John Henry Brown" means the living man making his home at Old Brown House in Devonshire...." In 1933 FDR took advantage of this confusion between the foreshortened descriptive name and the Trade Name and muddied the water still more----on purpose. His administration created millions of foreign situs trusts which just happened to be named after living Americans and which just happened to use all the same letters and Upper and Lower case style conventions as their abbreviated descriptive names and Trade Names already used. Thus the description of a living man was written as "John Henry Brown" and his Trade Name (unincorporated doing business name) was written "John Henry Brown" and now, without his knowledge or consent, the United States of America, Incorporated---- a for-profit governmental services corporation that was about to go bankrupt-- created a franchise for itself and named it "John Henry Brown", too. Of course, with a little mail fraud thrown in, when the living man "John Henry Brown" received a "statement" in the mail that was apparently addressed to him and which had all the outward appearances of a bill, he assumed it was his bill to pay. What other conclusion would be reasonable? And in this way we, our parents, and our grandparents have been tricked into "assuming" and paying for debts owed by others--- first by the United States of America, Incorporated, throughout its long bankruptcy reorganization from 1933 to 1999 when all its debts were finally discharged, and now, again, we are being dunned for payment of debts owed by other corporate entities merely named after us---- "JOHN HENRY BROWN" is a Cestui Que Vie Trust formed under the Municipal (independent foreign city state) Law of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation operated out of Puerto Rico under Puerto Rican Commonwealth Law. The Treasurer of the United States, Rosa Gumataotao Rios, is holding all your property including your name in a public trust named after you and the leeches benefiting from this are pretending that it is all "abandoned property" belonging to "no one" and that the UNITED STATES, INC. and its "STATE OF_______" franchises are the beneficiaries of your name and your property both public and private. Doesn't that just warm the cockles of your heart? You have been entrapped and defrauded and press-ganged into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, all your assets including your name have been "seized upon" while you have been declared "legally dead" and had your ESTATE administered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico...... In March of 2015 the UNITED STATES, INC. was declared insolvent by its creditors, with the result that its secondary creditors (we are obviously in line to be priority creditors of the whole shebang if we wake up) are now here claiming to own everything in sight. Thus the land grabs in Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and elsewhere. Thus the credit default swaps disguised as loans and "mortgages". Thus the false arrests and claims against JOHN HENRY BROWN, which is by DEFINITION is a foreigner, a debtor, and an "Enemy" of the State.
A rainbow pill??? 
