Dearest Mudra
Always trying to find love, peace, the road that is clear of conflict. That's why we love you
mudra wrote:
We are sensory beings. We evaluate things. When a dog growls at us, don't we "judge" that dog to be threatening? "Judgements" are just evaluations. We do it everyday in every situation.
If you meet me and I'm rude to you, should I blame YOU for "judging" my rudeness? Or should I understand that I've done something to cause you to think that I'm rude? If you knew "what I've been through" you may forgive my behaviour, but it wouldn't be YOUR fault for finding me rude at first.
True and True. It can be seen that his attitude is habitual and he HAS been given the opportunity over the months - it is not the first time he has bitten and we have sat back in the above understanding.
mudra wrote:
Imagine I was in a play, and my character was a homeless woman. If I walked into a store dressed in costume, how could I blame the people inside for thinking I was a homeless person? It's a more natural conclusion than "oh, I bet she's in costume for a play." Their evaluation of me would be wrong, but understandable. We can't blame ourselves for making perfectly natural evaluations.
If we want people to see us as a certain kind of person, we have to project that. Or we should be patient and give that person a chance to get to know us.
Looking at his attitude not only here, his channel and on PA, tells us something -
"By their fruits you shall know them"
He is the same everywhere he goes and this place is more understanding than anywhere else I have been. We have all over the months held back and given opportunity and given the benefit of the doubt - like I had mentioned. How long does he need?
He is habitual and the facts he presents speak for themselves - he offers nothing I can identify. He is so vague, I doubt anyone can figure what it is. Also, he mentions a technology that is not his to claim rights to have developed.
He is not an electronics engineer and admits such. He has little idea of the physics or technology he is playing around with. He cannot even explain what it is he is trying to achieve or what he has achieved, regardless of knowledge of the subject. He can be forgiven for not knowing about the technology and just like a jigsaw, he puts components together and gets an interesting effect and he thinks it is novel and groundbreaking where in fact is has been discovered, documented and well understood years ago. Then he comes here saying he can feed the world from it - come on - I am not so naive and neither should you be. Instead, if it can be beneficial and he does not understand the process, then you have to open it up for replication, testing and verification. To put this through a patent is not realistic if you cannot even provide measurements and document everything fully - and it takes resources he does not have. So the B.S. being dished out is neck high and I don't want to see any innocent not so clued in be dragged under.
mudra wrote:
We shouldn't jump to conclusions about others. We should remain open minded, and not let our first impression of another be final.
I believe people are fundamentally good but the burden they carry and their mental construct make them sometimes hard to reach .
True and Not True
It's true that we should not let first impressions blind us to the good, but this is not a case of first impression, is it?.
Have we not been open minded for months? Have we not given the benefit of the doubt, has he not been offered help to verify his clams, whenever we can figure what they are – it is a very generous offer of independent verification. Do you know how much work that involves? You have to try and understand where the energy is coming from and going to - there are complex concepts, measurements, logging and mathematics to support the verification.
Some people are just born evil. I do not believe this is the case here.
You cannot dispute that we have not been lenient and have suffered the abuse for long enough.
A line in the sand has to be drawn - enough is enough already. No one else should be taken in by it any longer.
If he is genuine let him come forward and present his information that is his to give to the person who has offered to help. It's just that simple - easy peasy, why is he making it so difficult unless there is something to hide? Then once and for all, let him be proved right or wrong, and take the glory or the lumps.
I want to be using free energy, I want to see the controllers poked in both eyes, I want an end to poverty, I want universal peace, I want it all and more - with an egg on top - and I want it yesterday. He has my full support if he can bring forward this secret hidden technology he claims to have developed where proven to be truly ground breaking, it demonstrates over unity, is fully replicatable and stable - I will give some money to help get it out to the world.
So do not get me wrong, I want this so badly. But I also do not want to see others being lead down the garden path. The blind leading the blind into a fiery furnace. That is where we are today and I want to prevent that catastrophe.
