Dr. Coldwell States That Cancer Can be Cured in Weeks

Electric Fields by others:

1) Robert Courier, French head of Academy of Sciences, Curing Terminal Tumors
http://www.cheniere.org/books/aids/priore.htm

2) Kaznacheyev's demonstration that any cellular death or disease can be caused electromagnetically is explained. A new definition for cancer is advanced, as is a long-term cumulative mechanism that causes it. The mechanism for Priore's demonstrated cures of terminal tumors in laboratory animals under rigorous scientific protocols is explained. A solution for the major cumulative mechanism for biological effects of EM fields and radiation is presented. A self-targeting mechanism is presented whereby complex WZ EM biwave pumping of the "cell as a nonlinear phase conjugate mirror material" produces an exact EM antidote signal for the specific cellular disease. It is argued that inexpensive, quick, nondebilitating, cures can be developed for most major dread diseases, including cancer, arteriosclerosis, and AIDS. Priore's remarkable and previously unexplained cures of terminal tumors in lab animals are cited as examples of applying the new model, albeit unwittingly.

http://www.cheniere.org/books/cancer/cancer.htm

iologically closed electric circuits: written by Björn Nordenström in 1983. A very good book about the same subject.
Can be read on google books:
http://books.google.fi/books?id=zb-3YzIn4ZcC&pg=PA77&lpg=PA77&dq=biologically+active+electric+circuits&source=bl&ots=UhrsULBEM5&sig=AKdnhA_82ELNQWeq8pSqrvEThMc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EHc6T8C9MYzO4QTimODSCg&sqi=2&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=biologically%20active%20electric%20circuits&f=false

The key element for me is getting the body alkaline. I don't know about sea salt as we use Himalayan salt and just in minute amounts.

I am not convinced that getting the body alkaline is the total answer.
Look to Rick Simpson's Oil. Cannabis oil is curing a lot of cancer and most of the patients are not doing detox protocols. Anyone know if cannabis oil makes the body more alkaline?

I personally think that detox is essential for maintaining health in general.


Some doctors inject HCL (about 0.2 ml) directly into veins to cure a variety of diseases, including infections and cancer. It is an old treatment lost to most naturopaths these days. So that would be going in an acid direction.

Perhaps more than anything it is the shock to the cancer cell to suddenly try to survive in an environment that it has not developed in.

Mercuriel wrote:

FFS's check this...

Dr. Leonard Coldwell above says that We should only be eating Sea Salt now as as Table Salt is ;

- 1/3 Fine Sand.

- 1/3 Fine Glass..

- 1/3 Actual NaCL...

I don't see the Evidence that Its occurring either. You're not getting Me. I was being facetious. This Doctor said It and I think Its His hearsay too. I was talking about It as in Him saying It...

Surely You can read right ? Its what I said above...

Simply put - No one is disagreeing with You...

^ And Your Link means what ? Use Aloe Vera ?

Since we are into promoting Aloe Vera.. I recommend:

Purified water; cetearyl olivate (olive oil derived), sorbitan olivate (olive oil derived), capryclic/capric triglyceride, cocos nucifera (coconut oil), vegetable glycerin, prunus aygdalus dulcis (sweet almond oil), cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, cetyl esters, aloe barbaensis (yes this is Aloe Vera) leaf extract, hippophae rhamnoides (sea buckthorn) fruit extract, matricaria recutita (chamomile) flower extract, calendula officinalis (calendula) flower extract, camelia sinensis (tea tree) leaf extract, citrus paradisi (grapefruit) fruit extract, ananas satisvus (pineapple) fruit extract, hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle) flower extract, organic sesaum indicum (sesame) seed oil, simmondsia chinensis (jojoba) seed oil, persea gratissima (avocado) oil, mangifera indica (mango) seed butter, tapioca starch, natural vanilla flavor, phenoxyethanol, ethylhexyglycerin.

Our Right to Bee You Ti Full!

http://vimeo.com/27661996

bump..

Somehow, I see this thread as having gone off topic and come to a full stop as well as being a vehicle to plug products another member sells
..
Shame. It is an important suubject - if true.. we should always be alert to possibilities that the food we eat can be bad for us. It is incumbent on everyone to take this subject seriously.

I too would like to see the evidence for table salt containing those ingredients.

On a similar track.. Sugar should be a prime culprit too.
It also does a similar job of work on the blood vessels.. Microcrystaline sugar pumped around your system acts like sandpaper, causing inflammation, cholesterol build up and thrombisis., leading to heart attack and stroke.. On the macro scale, take a pinch of sugar and rub it on your skin, see how that feels after a few minutes.

Back on the cancer track..
Yes for sure, THC is a strange substance indeed. It has the ability to target diseased, mutated cells and either kill them and/or revert them back to a normal state, where the normal signals for cellular apoptosis can resume and the bodies own immune system can recognise the defective cells and dispose of them.

Cancer grows over itself, a fibrous membraine that acts as a shield from the immune system and this is not the only mechanism that it uses to evade an immune response.. however, many substances can disrupt some of these mecanisms and again expose the cancer to the immune system.

A promising treatment that I also see along the lines of alkalinity is the Maple Syrup and Sodium Bicarb treatment.

This acts like a Trojan Horse, feeding the cancer with poison food. The Sugar acts as the transport mechanism to carry in the Bi-carb thereby killing the caner.

Another is H2O2 (Hydrogen Peroxide) 3%.

Both H2O2 and Bicarb give up freely the excess negatively charged oxygen atom to the normally positvely charged diseased cells/virus/bacteria/fungii. It's like a mini explosion whereby it blows a hole in the wall of the cells thereby killing them.

Finally for this topic, treatment in a Hypobaric chamber with an increased oxygen level can also do much the same.

It is unknown currently if these treatments are effective for all cancers however, many of them - yes for sure.

Signing off..

be well, stay well.

Thanks eMonkey...your right....cancer and the methods to fight it are a serious subject. The thread did go off topic.

_____________________

0Upon infection with the CD133-specific measles virus CD133-positive tumour cells (green) die off, leaving holes in the cell layer a few hours later. Even directly adjacent CD133-negative cells (red) are protected from infection.Scientists at the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) have successfully created oncolytic viruses which effectively target CD133-positive cancer stem cells to infect and kill them. In animal experiments, multiple tumour foci could be completely eradicated. Cancer Research reports on the results of this research in its online edition of 4th January (Friday afternoon).

Tumours do not consist of homogenous cell populations but contain cancer stem cells which respond poorly to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and are considered to be responsible for metastatic tumours. Scientists have therefore stepped up their efforts to find ways of identifying and eliminating these "tumour-initiating cells".

The cell surface protein CD133 is currently discussed as a characteristic marker for such cancer stem cells. The PEI President’s Research Group "Molecular Biotechnology and Gene therapy" led by Professor Christian Buchholz has modified an attenuated and thus innocuous measles virus for the targeted attack on cancer stem cells. The modified virus requires the surface protein CD133 as receptor for penetration into the cell. The scientists were able to prove that the modified virus infects only CD133-positive tumor cells even when these are cultivated in close contact with CD133-negative cells.

In collaboration with Heidelberg University and the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ), the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut’s scientists tested the anti-tumoural effect of their targeted virus using mouse models reflecting glioma, colon carcinoma, and liver cancer. The modified virus showed pronounced anti-tumoural activity in all animal models tested – the tumour growth was substantially reduced or even entirely suppressed. The scientists compared the effectiveness of their modified oncolytic measles virus with that of an oncolytic measles virus currently investigated in clinical trials which does not show any specificity for subtypes of tumour cells. "We were surprised that the CD133-specific virus showed an anti-tumoural activity which was at least as good as that of the standard virus. In the liver cancer model, the anti-tumoural activity was clearly superior and led to complete tumour remission", said Professor Buchholz. In further studies, the research team aims at elucidating why their viruses turned out to be more effective in fighting tumours than conventional oncolytic viruses which are supposed to attack all tumour cell subtypes.

Is it really only cancer cells that are attacked by the CD133-specific virus? In fact, not only cancer stem cells bear the surface marker CD133 but also haematopoietic stem cells. Yet, haematopoietic stem cells were not attacked by the oncolytic measles virus. This is due to the innate immunity of these cells, which protects them from an attack by measles virus. Many tumour cell types exhibit a defect in innate immunity allowing the virus to replicate unimpaired.

One advantage of the use of oncolytic viruses in cancer therapy is their enhancer mechanism. Infected tumor cells produce progeny virus particles which are released upon cell lysis and are able to detect further tumour cells.


Personal note: experts who study how vitamin D works on cancers recommends 5000IU a day... http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/health-conditions/cancer/
http://www.naturalnews.com/032202_vitamin_D_deficiency_disease.html

Lots of links in this thread. http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2108067/pg1