NANO CHEMTRAILS

If you did not enjoy "traditional" chemtrails raining down on you, you are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable "smart" molecules tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints.

Under development since 1995, the military's goal is to install microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into "smart particles" the size of a single molecule.

Invisible except under the magnification of powerful microscopes, these nano-size radio-controlled chips are now being made out of mono-atomic gold particles. Networked together on the ground or assembling in the air, thousands of sensors will link into a single supercomputer no larger than a grain of sand.

Brought to you by the same military-corporate-banking complex that runs America's permanent wars, Raytheon Corp is already profiting from new weather warfare technologies. The world's fourth largest military weapons maker bought E-Systems in 1995, just one year after that military contractor bought APTI, holder of Bernard Eastlund's HAARP patents.

Raytheon also owns General Dynamics, the world's leading manufacturer of military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Raytheon also reports the weather for NOAA through its Advanced Weather Information Processing System. According to researcher Brendan Bombaci of Durango, Colorado, these Raytheon computers are directy linked with their UAV weather modification drones. Bombaci reports that NOAA paid Raytheon more than $300 million for this "currently active, 10-year project."

She goes on to describe the Joint Environmental Toolkit used by the U.S. Air Force in its Weather Weapons System. Just the thing for planet tinkerers.

GREEN LIGHT
For public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized. "Microelectric Mechanical Sensors" (MMS) and "Global Environmental Mechanical Sensors" sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct 31/05]

According to a U.S. military flier called Military Progress, "The green light has been given" to disperse swarms of wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the troposphere by remotely-controlled UAV drones for "global warming mitigation."

U.S. Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force drones "are slated to deploy various payloads for weather warfare," Military Progress asserts. This dual mission - to slow global warming and use weather as a weapon - seems somewhat contradictory.

FIGHTING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE
U.S. Military Inc. is already in the climate change business big time. The single biggest burner of petroleum on this planet, its high-flying aircraft routinely rend Earth's protective radiation shielding with nitrous oxide emissions, while depositing megatons of additional carbon, sulfur and water particles directly into the stratosphere - where they will do three-times more damage than CO2 alone.

Go figure. A single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an hour. An Apache gunship gets about one-half mile to the gallon. The 1,838 Abrams tanks in Iraq achieve five gallons to the mile, while firing dusty radioactive shells that will continue destroying human DNA until our sun goes supernova.

A single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns 5,600 gallons of bunker fuel in an hour - or two million gallons of bunker oil every 14 days. Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on another half- million gallons of fuel to supply its jets.

The U.S. Air Force consumed nearly half of the Department of Defense's entire fuel supply in 2006, burning 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel aloft.

While flying two to five-hour chemtrails missions to reflect incoming sunlight and slow global warming, a single KC-10 tanker will burn 2,050 gallons of highly toxic jet fuel every hour. The larger and older KC-135 Stratotanker carries 31,275 gallons of chemtrails and burns 2,650 gallons of fuel per hour.

The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 pounds of CO2. Each gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2.

Total it up and routine operations by a military bigger than all other world militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total could be eliminated by ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. [TomDispatch.com June 16/07; huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07]

NANO RAIN
Meanwhile, the 60 year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone cannot carry a heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification particles can be crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail slurry packed into a tanker the size of a DC-10. T

According to the air force's own weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025, clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report real time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.

Then these smart particles will be used to increase or decrease the storm's size and intensity - and "steer" it to "specific targets".

The air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails "will be able to adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding situation and make adjustments throughout the process." Instead of being sprayed into the air at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of normal chemtrails, nano versions will be able to "enhance their dispersal" by "adjusting their atmospheric buoyancy" and "communicating with each other" as they steer themselves in a single coordinated flock within their own artificial cloud.

Nano-chemtrails will even "change their temperature and polarity to improve their seeding effects," the air force noted. [Daily Texan July 30/07]

Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the military's hope that these new nano weather-warrior bots: "Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions - clouds of microscopic computer particles communicating with each other and with a control system, could provide tremendous capability."

"Nanotechnology Cloaking System.

This scenario protects from a friendly satellite being radiated with radar energy from a hostile source. The sensor array on the surface of the friendly spacecraft detects inbound radar energy. The control system then directs the nanotechnology satellite skin to form a radar absorbent material and take an angular shape which will reflect the radar energy away from the source. Molecular sized computers, acting as the brains of this unique defensive shield, will enable the system to react almost instantaneously to inputs from the sensor array. The advent of nanocomputers, says Drexler, will give us practical machines with a trillion times the power of today’s computers, all in a molecular package.

An alternate protective means is a stealthy satellite capable of generating an electrostatic or magnetic repulsion field which will shield the spacecraft from natural threats.32 The repulsion field would be employed against low stress threats such as space debris or possibly to protect against solar flares. An important side benefit of such a repulsion field is the ability to use it as a sensor field to determine whether a satellite has been damaged by natural causes (space debris) or an attack. This capability gives the satellite controllers immediate information as to the probable cause should a satellite mysteriously drop off the screen.

Intelligent materials are another emerging technology with great possibilities in this arena. Researchers are creating materials which, inspired by nature, can anticipate failure, repair themselves, and adapt to the environment. Smart materials employ tiny actuators and motors as muscles, sensors as nerves and memory, and computational networks that represent the brain and spinal column.33 Molecular computers coupled with molecular sized assembly lines ready to build the right shield at the right moment with materials capable of adapting to the environment may make cloaking a reality in 2025.

As far as feasibility, Stewart Brand, a leading futurist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, reflects on nanotechnology, stating "the science is good, the engineering is feasible, the paths of approach are many, the consequences are revolutionary-times-revolutionary, and the schedule is: in our lifetimes."

Commercial interest in these technology developments, for uses in adaptive assembly lines and self-repairing machines, will increase the probability they will be available for incorporation in US space systems. Concept of Operations. The satellite cloaking system will operate on all space assets critical to US operations. This includes both military as well as key civilian spacecraft. The cloaking system will go into
action once alerted by its onboard sensor array or warned by its command and control network.

First, the system will classify the incoming detection signal as radar, infrared, or visual (remember, individual photon detection is the norm). Sensor information is passed to the nanocomputer control system which relays commands to the nanobuilding blocks in the satellite skin. The building blocks, acting as their own molecular assembly lines, manufacture a skin which is optimized to reflect or absorb incoming energy.
The ability to change at near instantaneous speeds allows the system to overcome the problem of suboptimal design (the trade–off between reflecting and absorbing materials) encountered in today’s stealth aircraft. The nanotech spacecraft skin will be capable of battle damage repair to the spacecraft (a self-healing satellite). The ability to act autonomously to repair itself greatly reduces demand on the logistics system, which in space is a great advantage in both cost and time.

Countermeasures.

The most obvious countermeasure to a nanotechnology cloaking system is the ability to disrupt the molecular interactions which enable the system to operate. The possibility also exists for a new detection spectrum, possibly a smart beam, which is capable of changing to counter a response by the cloaking system. Destruction of smart nanotechnology materials should not pose a problem as the system will be capable of rejuvenation. However, this technology can be expected to proliferate through commercial developers to the community of space faring nations. The ability to perform the offensive counterspace mission against cloaked satellites presents its own unique challenges to US forces."

-//-

"With regard to seeding techniques, improvements in the materials and delivery methods are not only plausible but likely. Smart materials based on nanotechnology are currently being developed with gigaops computer capability at their core. They could adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given fog seeding situation and even make adjustments throughout the process. They might also enhance their dispersal qualities by adjusting their buoyancy, by communicating with each other, and by steering themselves within the fog. They will be able to provide immediate and continuous effectiveness feedback by integrating with a larger sensor network and can also change their temperature and polarity to improve their seeding effects. As mentioned above, UAVs could be used to deliver and distribute these smart materials."

"Nanotechnology also offers possibilities for creating simulated weather. A cloud, or several clouds, of microscopic computer particles, all communicating with each other and with a larger control system could provide tremendous capability. Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions, such clouds could be designed to have a wide-range of properties. They might exclusively block optical sensors or could adjust to become impermeable to other surveillance methods. They could also provide an atmospheric electrical potential difference, which otherwise might not exist, to achieve precisely aimed and timed lightning strikes. Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon, the potential for psychological operations in many situations could be fantastic.

One major advantage of using simulated weather to achieve a desired effect is that unlike other approaches, it makes what are otherwise the results of deliberate actions appear to be the consequences of natural weather phenomena. In addition, it is potentially relatively inexpensive to do. According to J. Storrs Hall, a scientist at Rutgers University conducting research on nanotechnology, production costs of these nanoparticles could be about the same price per pound as potatoes.34 This of course discounts research and development costs, which will be primarily borne by the private sector and be considered a sunk cost by 2025 and probably earlier."

Yeeeeee Haaaaar!

God bless America!




And God save the rest of us from the most blatantly destructive, arrogant and invasive nation of peoples this planet has ever had the displeasure of witnessing.



If they dont rape and plunder mother Earth's resources then they destroy our societies and our health with their fast food "culture", force countries to eat genetically modified foods, take our jobs, destroy our families with their lawyer and litigation culture, brain wash us with their mind-numbing crap tv, force us to have their weapons of mass destruction on our soil, force us to fight their filthy wars so they can have more and more oil and gold, fake terrorism so they can destroy our very freedoms, our very souls.

Go home, take yer retard movies, take yer wars, take yer junk food, take yer GMOs, take yer FDA, yer FBI, yer CIA, yer NASA yer BS Acronyms, yer weather wars, yer exploitation, yer worthless greenbacks, yer loans, yer credit culture, yer lawyers, yer materialism, yer greed, yer retarded chimpanzee intelligence, yer "yee hars" yer "woops" and yer big-headed arsolic arrogance.

Well guess what, no-one wants to be the bully's friend anymore, so big fat bully is having a strop and throwing it's toys out it's pram... but no-one's scared, we know it's tricks now, and it hasn't got any food left. Starved of all it's food for committing evil against the good peoples of this planet, it's dying.... from the inside... and it knows it, every single last one of it's shitizens are shitscared, just look on any forum.

It even tricked it's own good people into thinking they were there to save the world, whilst all the time it was they who where destroying it, it's societies, its countries, its peoples, it's wildlife. What could you really expect from a nation built on the extermination of a whole race of indigenous peoples.

So I guess for the US and the evil which resides within, its karma-time, what goes around comes around, and its here now. Games up. Go play some place else, preferably not on our planet. Go take yer guns with yer fat boy because your arch-enemy, your nemesis is coming in to land, Christ, and this time there's a whole generation of us, not just one bloke.

Oh and PS, can yer take yer stupid "Aliens" with yer too!

That video is excellent Burgundia and oh so believable. Horrifying actually. Now I've got to figure out whether I have a tick (Lyme Disease) infection or whether Morgellons/BioApi Phase I or Phase 2 is a factor. Either way I'm using my Zapper big time.

_____________________________________
As it is below; so it is above

At the link below, they have instructions on how to use red wine to see if you have these particles in your system at the bottom of the page.  With pictures of what to expect.  Worth a look if you suspect infection.

http://www.dataasylum.com/bioapi-physical-fibers-evidence.html

OK, here's a more comprehensive version of that spit test I found from http://ezinearticles.com/?Concerned-About-the-Effects-of-Chemtrails?-Try-Red-Wine-Spit-Test&id=6185989

Red wine spit test:

You can perform the red wine spit test on yourself to draw out fungal parasites through your gums. Generally 100% of people who try this test are positive. Infection produces the symptoms of skin conditions as well as a parasite-induced sleeping sickness.

Please refer to the book 'Morgellons: A Natural Medicine Approach', by Gwen Scott N.D.

'Red Wine Spit Test': Materials and Procedure

White plastic bathroom cups

3% H2O2 (Hydrogen Peroxide)

Merlot Red Wine (use an inexpensive bottle)

Measuring spoons

Toothbrush/toothpaste

Watch or clock

1) Brush teeth well.

2) Rinse mouth with water thoroughly.

3) Mix 2 tsp (10mL) of Merlot Red Wine with 1 tsp (5mL) Hydrogen Peroxide in a plastic cup.

4) Use the red wine / peroxide solution as a mouth rinse; Rinse mouth *vigorously* with the wine/peroxide solution for exactly five minutes. Make sure to swish it in your cheeks and gums for the full 5 minutes.

5) Now spit all the rinse into a white plastic bathroom cup.

6) Carefully examine the rinse for fibres. Even a magnifying glass will help you see the results better. They are invariably present, and should look somewhat like wet chewing tobacco. Prepare to be shocked. These are components of nanotech pathogens which we have all been infected with, most likely via chemtrails.

Optional

7) You can add 91% or higher IPA (Isopropyl Alcohol) to the precipitated fibres to remove the red pigment caused by the wine. The fibers generally float like a jellyfish on top of the IPA.

The first time I tried this test it seemed to be clear. I was relieved as my wife's results were shocking. Two days Iater I tried again and couldn't believe what I saw. Images of what to expect are available via the link in the author's box.

Graeme Dinnen

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6185989

OK, got a bottle of Merlot and did the test as initially described above. Got the same sort of icky results in my bathroom sink as those pictured on the site at the link. Then I had a good look at the 'evidence' and noticed that the strings broke apart very easily, which I wouldn't have expected them to do if they were actually live parasites or the fibers people say they find in their wounds.

So I looked around further and found this, which basically explains it all and really debunks the 'test' altogether IMO.

Have you ever peered into another person's spittoon at a wine tasting and contemplated their "stringy bits"? In fact, a closer inspection of the "bits" produced by different people will reveal that, like snowflakes, no two are identical. Some look like delicate and ornate maroon coloured curtains, swaying precariously above the wine below. Others float on top of the wine's surface like a cake of purple soap that has been left in the bath water overnight.

..I suspect I might be alone in my interest of this, but, my fascination emanates from knowing that these human "spittle portraits", are the public display of what is a wonderful facet of red wine; astringency.

Astringency is the drying, roughing and sometimes puckering sensation that is experienced after tasting most red wines. All the truly great red wines of the world produce soft supple mouth-coating astringency. The evocative term "slippery" has also been used by some wine-writers to describe the pleasurable feeling of a high quality astringent sensation. Feeling is the operative word here, as although astringency is an in-mouth experience, it is a touch sensation not a taste as one might expect.

So what causes astringency, and what does it have to do with spittoon residues? Red wines are rich in substances called phenolics. These substances are almost exclusively located in the skins and seeds of grapes, and are extracted from them during fermentation. There are hundreds of different types of phenolics in red wine, however, depending on their chemical structure, these substances play quite different roles in the way a wine looks, tastes and feels. One class of phenolics called the anthocyanins give red wine its colour, another called the catechins are bitter. Another type, officially called the polymeric flavan-3-ols, but better known as tannins, are primarily responsible for astringency.

Saliva contains a number of proteins that lubricate the surfaces of the mouth. When we taste a red wine, these salivary proteins interact with the wine's tannins. When a protein mixes with a tannin, they react and join, and react and join, ad infinitum. The proteins are effectively mortared together by the tannins. This results in the formation of "super structures" that are so heavy they precipitate, and are consequently spat out. As the lubricating proteins are in the spittoon rather than in the mouth, then the oral surfaces become dry and fail to slip easily across each other. Touch receptors in your mouth, which normally track the food in your mouth so that you can time your swallowing, then signal to the brain the existence of the roughing and drying sensation of astringency. As an short aside, each person's salivary composition is slightly different, which explains the individual nature of each persons "glyco-protein-flavan-3-ol complexes (aka stringy bits)".

From: http://www.aromadictionary.com/articles/wineastringency_article.html

Mystery solved. Not unhappy about the nice bottle of Merlot I bought though.