Particles Found to Travel Faster Than Speed of Light

CERN claims neutrinos went faster than the cosmic speed barrier of 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second)
A neutrino beam fired from a particle accelerator near Geneva to a lab 454 miles away in Italy traveled 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light
26th September 2011

Scientists spoke of their disbelief yesterday over claims that particles have apparently been recorded travelling faster than the speed of light.
If the calculations are correct, the findings by physicists at the CERN research centre they have disproved Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity – the cornerstone of physics.
Subatomic particles called neutrinos were beamed from the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland to a laboratory in Italy 454 miles away, and beat the speed of light by 60 nanoseconds.
But other scientists have dismissed the claims, with one saying he 'would eat his shorts' if they are proved right.
Celebrity scientist Brain Cox was not so dismissive, saying that if the results are confirmed it would be 'one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time'.
Others were more cynical. Jim Al-Khalili, Professor of Physics at the University of Surrey, said: ‘Let me put my money where my mouth is: if the CERN experiment proves to be correct and neutrinos have broken the speed of light, I will eat my boxer shorts on live TV.’
The apparent findings raises science fiction scenarios such as sending information back in time and blurring the line between past and present.
As experts across the world expressed their shock – and cynicism – the physicists at CERN insisted they had tested and re-tested the findings for six months and could not find anything to alter the result.
If they are right the neutrinos made the journey in 0.0024 seconds, travelling at 299,798,454 metres per second.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2040735/Speed-light-experiments-baffling-result-Cern-Did-Einstein-wrong.html#ixzz1abp88rHq

Love Always
mudra

I hope that law-breaking neutrino got a ticket. If one gets away with it, the rest of the herd will try it too. Gotta make an example out of that rebellious neutrino. Neuter that neutrino! We have events! We have ways to slow them down! Many ways. Seriously, I think we will have to rewrite a lot of our science. I think certain aspects of a genuine hidden science have been introduced through various scientists, such as Darwin and Einstein, but that they have been partial truths or half-truths, which were misrepresentations of the true science, which is probably ancient science, stolen from an ancient civilization. Just speculation...

Everyone knows of His General Theory of Relativity but not many know of the other Paper He wrote about Relativity...

His Unified Field Theory namely and while most would say He never wrote It - I have good reason to think that He did...

I believe that Quantum Mechanics / Physics was the trickle-down from this Theory and that It was parted out to varius bright Minds after Einstein's Death so as to carry on the Calculations and bring it out to Mainstream Soceity as a Given...

This is upliftment of a sort and was necessary to get Our heads in the right place to move forward...

I wonder if there is a connection between Gizeh Intelligence, the Knights Templar, the Masons, the Nazis, the Jesuits, Charles Darwin, Nicola Tesla, Albert Einstein, Victor Schauberger, the Federal Reserve, the City States, Isis, Horus, Set, etc, and et al? I really don't ask this in a mean way. I continue to think that the historical factional conflicts have been something to behold, and that all factions were (and are) a mixture of good and evil. Here is an interesting wiki-link focusing upon Albert Einstein and 1905. Four very important papers in one year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annus_Mirabilis_papers Tesla was a busy man around that time as well, wasn't he? My current goal is to know a lot of what initiated folk know, without going to meetings, taking oaths, or getting involved in creepy, corrupt, or violent activities. I like people like Jordan Maxwell, Joseph Farrell, Richard Hoagland, Jim Marrs, Bill Cooper, et al. This is not an endorsement, but I like people who think deeply about hidden things. I have jokingly talked about meeting with Nazi Egyptologists on the Darkside of the Moon, but I'll bet they actually exist, and they are probably very interesting people. Perhaps some of them aren't even people, as we know people to be. I really just want the creepy, corrupt, and violent aspects of this solar system to go bye-bye...

Thanks for that specific Link Oxy...

As if to prove the veracity of what I've said previously ;

"Einstein's theories for the photoelectric effect extended the quantum theory which Max Planck had developed in his successful explanation of black body radiation."

Yeah I think He and Tesla had an inside track if You get My meaning...

IE - They were either advised by the larger Subset - OR - From It as Members...

Personally, I'm convinced the two of them were both contactees.

It's really weird. I have an incredible world-view, solar system view, and universe-view, which is a composite of so many things -- but this view is really impossible to describe. I feel as though I could get lost in all of this, but I might have a difficult time finding my way back -- so I really have to go through life with my foot on the brakes, so to speak. It's really been like this for a very long time. I think I must've known a helluva lot in my last incarnation -- but this scares me more than you can imagine. I must've been an insider, which probably wouldn't have been a good thing. I knew too much as a child -- and then I got dumber and dumber. But now, with the internet, it's as if a light is starting to come back on, and I almost feel more at home with all of the strange things and conspiracy theories than I do in the 'real world'. I feel as though I could exist quite comfortably within the secret government and secret space program -- which scares the hell out of me. It's not supposed to be that way -- is it??!! Tonight, I had a strange urge to study Weapons Systems and International Banking. Many years ago, I thought it would be cool to work for the Rand Corporation! I could've been a Soldier of Insanity! I might've been a Protoge of Dr. Strangelove! The Military-Industrial Complex and the Medical-Industrial Complex are technically very attractive, but when one applies the ethical scanning electron microscope, they are both extremely corrupt and insane!! I should stop.

Mercuriel wrote:Everyone knows of His General Theory of Relativity but not many know of the other Paper He wrote about Relativity...

His Unified Field Theory namely and while most would say He never wrote It - I have good reason to think that He did...

I believe that Quantum Mechanics / Physics was the trickle-down from this Theory and that It was parted out to varius bright Minds after Einstein's Death so as to carry on the Calculations and bring it out to Mainstream Soceity as a Given...

This is upliftment of a sort and was necessary to get Our heads in the right place to move forward...

Exactly Merc. For the most of the world population, it is also not known that Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity didn't iclude gravitation in it's postulates. Ten years later (1915), he just tried, and I must highlight the word tried, to implement the gravitation in his General Theory of Relativity.

This is explained in great lenght in the book "Vernetzte Intelligenz" by Grazyna Fosar and Franz Bludorf (and I thank you Carol for introducing this book here in the mists many monhts ago). Too pitty this book never "saw the light" in an english edition, it is well worth of reading I must say.

Here's an interesting excerpt from an article on Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_field_theory

Current status
Gravity has yet to be successfully included in a theory of everything. Simply trying to combine the graviton with the strong and electroweak interactions runs into fundamental difficulties since the resulting theory is not renormalizable. Theoretical physicists have not yet formulated a widely accepted, consistent theory that combines general relativity and quantum mechanics. The incompatibility of the two theories remains an outstanding problem in the field of physics. Some theoretical physicists currently believe that a quantum theory of general relativity may require frameworks other than field theory itself, such as string theory or loop quantum gravity. Some models in string theory that are promising by way of realizing our familiar standard model are the perturbative heterotic string models, 11-dimensional M-theory, Singular geometries (e.g. orbifold and orientifold), D-branes and other branes, flux compactification and warped geometry, non-perturbative type IIB superstring solutions (F-theory).

So more then ever...nothing seems to be as it is. When these bright minds (and as Carol says, a probable contactees) weren't able to describe technicaly and mathematicaly what they could "see" in their minds, we can just assume how complex the Matrix really is.

Much respect
Mall...

Faster Than Light Neutrinos


Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:06:21 -0700
Subject: neutrinos faster than speed of light?
From: bmcelligott4789@gmail.com
To: omniphysics@cosmosdawn.net

Hello! i've been reading on your website for a couple years now off and on, i really enjoy what you've done, the truth that you have found and helped so many others find for themselves. you are healing our concept of self and that is a commendable task.

i am writing now because i was wondering what you had to say about the neutrinos breaking lightspeed barrier, i can't remember if you have posted about it or not, did a quick search and it didn't find anything....anyways, would love to hear your take on things.

Have a wonderful day!

Brendan


Faster than light particles found, claim scientists


Particle physicists detect neutrinos travelling faster than light, a feat forbidden by Einstein's theory of special relativity




Ian Sample, science correspondent

guardian.co.uk,


Thursday 22 September 2011 23.32 BST


Neutrinos, like the ones above, have been detected travelling faster than light, say particle physicists.

Photograph: Dan Mccoy /Corbis

It is a concept that forms a cornerstone of our understanding of the universe and the concept of time – nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.

But now it seems that researchers working in one of the world's largest physics laboratories, under a mountain in central Italy, have recorded particles travelling at a speed that is supposedly forbidden by Einstein's theory of special relativity.

Scientists at the Gran Sasso facility will unveil evidence on Friday that raises the troubling possibility of a way to send information back in time, blurring the line between past and present and wreaking havoc with the fundamental principle of cause and effect.

They will announce the result at a special seminar at Cern – the European particle physics laboratory – timed to coincide with the publication of a research paper (pdf) describing the experiment.

Researchers on the Opera (Oscillation Project with Emulsion-tRacking Apparatus) experiment recorded the arrival times of ghostly subatomic particles called neutrinos sent from Cern on a 730km journey through the Earth to the Gran Sasso lab.

The trip would take a beam of light 2.4 milliseconds to complete, but after running the experiment for three years and timing the arrival of 15,000 neutrinos, the scientists discovered that the particles arrived at Gran Sasso sixty billionths of a second earlier, with an error margin of plus or minus 10 billionths of a second.

The measurement amounts to the neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light by a fraction of 20 parts per million. Since the speed of light is 299,792,458 metres per second, the neutrinos were evidently travelling at 299,798,454 metres per second.

The result is so unlikely that even the research team is being cautious with its interpretation. Physicists said they would be sceptical of the finding until other laboratories confirmed the result.

Antonio Ereditato, coordinator of the Opera collaboration, told the Guardian: "We are very much astonished by this result, but a result is never a discovery until other people confirm it.

"When you get such a result you want to make sure you made no mistakes, that there are no nasty things going on you didn't think of. We spent months and months doing checks and we have not been able to find any errors.

"If there is a problem, it must be a tough, nasty effect, because trivial things we are clever enough to rule out."

The Opera group said it hoped the physics community would scrutinise the result and help uncover any flaws in the measurement, or verify it with their own experiments.

Subir Sarkar, head of particle theory at Oxford University, said: "If this is proved to be true it would be a massive, massive event. It is something nobody was expecting.

"The constancy of the speed of light essentially underpins our understanding of space and time and causality, which is the fact that cause comes before effect."

The key point underlying causality is that the laws of physics as we know them dictate that information cannot be communicated faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, added Sarkar.

"Cause cannot come after effect and that is absolutely fundamental to our construction of the physical universe. If we do not have causality, we are buggered."

The Opera experiment detects neutrinos as they strike 150,000 "bricks" of photographic emulsion films interleaved with lead plates. The detector weighs a total of 1300 tonnes.

Despite the marginal increase on the speed of light observed by Ereditato's team, the result is intriguing because its statistical significance, the measure by which particle physics discoveries stand and fall, is so strong.

Physicists can claim a discovery if the chances of their result being a fluke of statistics are greater than five standard deviations, or less than one in a few million. The Gran Sasso team's result is six standard deviations.

Ereditato said the team would not claim a discovery because the result was so radical. "Whenever you touch something so fundamental, you have to be much more prudent," he said.

Alan Kostelecky, an expert in the possibility of faster-than-light processes at Indiana University, said that while physicists would await confirmation of the result, it was none the less exciting.

"It's such a dramatic result it would be difficult to accept without others replicating it, but there will be enormous interest in this," he told the Guardian.

One theory Kostelecky and his colleagues put forward in 1985 predicted that neutrinos could travel faster than the speed of light by interacting with an unknown field that lurks in the vacuum.

"With this kind of background, it is not necessarily the case that the limiting speed in nature is the speed of light," he said. "It might actually be the speed of neutrinos and light goes more slowly."

Neutrinos are mysterious particles. They have a minuscule mass, no electric charge, and pass through almost any material as though it was not there.

Kostelecky said that if the result was verified – a big if – it might pave the way to a grand theory that marries gravity with quantum mechanics, a puzzle that has defied physicists for nearly a century.

"If this is confirmed, this is the first evidence for a crack in the structure of physics as we know it that could provide a clue to constructing such a unified theory," Kostelecky said.

Heinrich Paes, a physicist at Dortmund University, has developed another theory that could explain the result. The neutrinos may be taking a shortcut through space-time, by travelling from Cern to Gran Sasso through extra dimensions. "That can make it look like a particle has gone faster than the speed of light when it hasn't," he said.

But Susan Cartwright, senior lecturer in particle astrophysics at Sheffield University, said: "Neutrino experimental results are not historically all that reliable, so the words 'don't hold your breath' do spring to mind when you hear very counter-intuitive results like this."

Teams at two experiments known as T2K in Japan and MINOS near Chicago in the US will now attempt to replicate the finding. The MINOS experiment saw hints of neutrinos moving at faster than the speed of light in 2007 but has yet to confirm them.

• This article was amended on 23 September 2011 to clarify the relevance of the speed of light to causality.




Dear Brendan!

The measured violation of the speed of light cosmic acceleration limit as 1 part in 50,000, if confirmed, simply illustrates the nature of the (anti)neutrinos in their role of the standard model of particle physics.

As you can discern in the accompanying descriptions, reproduced at:

http://www.thuban.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&fid=&lastp=1&id=E4C02335-4EC2-4BEC-8532-7D7CFFFDF4EC

the neutrinos are massless in their basic electron- and muon flavours, but experience a Higgsian Restmass Induction at the 0.052 electronvolt energy level and in the form of a ''Sterile Higgs Neutrino'. This constituted a verified experimental result at the Super Kamiokande neutrino detector beneath the Japanese Alps and was published worldwide on June 4th, 1998.

The (provisionally) measured increase in 'c' as the lightspeed invariant was the ratio 299,792,458/299,798,454=0.99998...

This can be translated to a decrease in the mass of the electron by this Higgsian neutrino mass induction in the range from: 2.969 - 3.021 eV, centred on 2.995 eV and differing by 0.052106 eV as the mass differential measured by the Kamiokande detector.

Using a relativistic electronmass at 0.18077c at the 8.5748 keV level of electric potential, (as in the derivation of the Higgs neutrinomass below and using cosmic calibrated units *), then decreases the relativistic electronmass from 9.290527155x10^-31 kg* or 520,491.856 eV*, by 2.995 eV* (or so 5.4x10^-36 kg*) as 520,491.856 eV* - 2.995 eV* = 520,488.861 eV*.

This compares as a trisected kernel (see the fractional electron charge distribution as the Leptonic Outer Ring) within the error margins to the variation in 'c' ratio as per the article:

520,488.861/520,491.856=0.999994=1/1.000006 as 3 parts in 521,000 or about 1 part in 174,000 and so about 30% of the lightspeed variance as the ratio 299,792,458/299,798,454=0.99998...and as 1 part in 50,000.

A detailed discussion of the subatomic quark-lepton charge distribution is found here:

The Charge Distribution of the Wavequarkian Standard Model - "Large proton Halo sparks devilish row"

http://www.thuban.spruz.com/forums/?page=post&id=8C67A51B-F47A-4646-A053-ADAD87677F63&fid=019788EF-0F1C-4E3D-B875-AB41438E63AD



The cosmic acceleration limit so is not violated by measuring electron-neutrino interactions, but the Higgs Bosonic Restmass Induction manifests in a subatomic internal charge redistribution, which reduces the energy of the interacting electron (or muon or tauon) interactions, which are always associated with their leptonic parental counterparts.

It so is the massless eigenstate of the 'Precursor Higgs Boson' as a 'Scalar RestmassPhoton' coupled to a colourcharged gauge photon of 'sourcesink antidradiation' as a Gauge Goldstone Boson (string or brane), which partitions this primordial selfstate into a trisected 'Scalar Higgs Neutrino Kernel' encompassed by an 'Inner Mesonic Ring' and an 'Outer Leptonic Ring', then defining a post Big Bang reconfiguration of the unified gauged particle states, commonly known as the Standard Model of Particle Physics.

Measuring (anti)neutrinos as travelling 'faster than the speed of light', so can be interpreted as a superbrane interaction in the multidimensional selfstate preceding the so called Big Bang, which was in fact preceded by an inflationary de Broglie wavematter phase epoch, where the 'speed of light' is by nature tachyonic as a wavematter speed V_dB.

Data:
Schwarzschild-HubbleRadius:
R_H=2G_oM_H/c²

Gravitational String-Oscillator(ZPE)Harmonic-Potential-Energy:
E_P^o=½hf_o=hc/4πl_P=½l_Pc²/G_o=½m_Pc²=G_om_PM_H/R_H
for string-duality coupling between wormhole mass m_P and closure Black Hole metric
M_H=ρ_criticalV_Seed

Gravitational Acceleration per unit-stringmass:
a_g= G_oM_H/R_H²=G_oM_Hc⁴/4G_o²M_H²=c⁴/4G_oM_H=c²/2R_H=½H_oc

for a Nodal Hubble-Constant:
H_o=c/R<sub>H

Inflaton parameters:</sub>


De Broglie Phase-Velocity (V_dB) and de Broglie Phase-Acceleration (A_dB):

V_dB=R_Hf_o ~ 4.793x10⁵⁶(m/s)* ~ 1.598x10⁴⁸ c = 10²²R_H
A_dB=R_Hf_o²~ 1.438x10⁸⁷ (m/s²)*

De Broglie Phase Speed: V_dB=wavenlengthxfrequency=(h/mV_Group)x(mc²/h)=c²/V_Group>c for all V_Group< c

This then represents 'my take' on the recent 'faster than light' measurements at San Grasso and CERN according to Quantum Relativity.

Tonyblue









Hypersphere volumes and the mass of the Tau-neutrino

Consider the universe's thermodynamic expansion to proceed at an initializing time (and practically at lightspeed for the lightpath x=ct describing the hypersphere radii) to from a single spacetime quantum with a quantized toroidal volume 2π²r_w³ and where r_w is the characteristic wormhole radius for this basic building unit for a quantized universe (say in string parameters given in the Planck scale and its transformations).

At a time t_G, say so 18.85 minutes later, the count of space time quanta can be said to be 9.677x10¹⁰² for a universal 'total hypersphere radius' of about r_G=3.39x10¹¹ meters and for a G-Hypersphere volume of so 7.69x10³⁵cubic meters.

{This radius is about 2.3 Astronomical Units (AUs) and about the distance of the Asteroid Belt from the star Sol in a typical (our) solar system.}

This modelling of a mapping of the quantum-microscale onto the cosmological macroscale should now indicate the mapping of the wormhole scale onto the scale of the sun itself.

r_w/R_Sun(i)=R_e/r_E for R_Sun(i)=r_wr_E/R_e=1,971,030 meters. This gives an 'inner' solar core of diameter about 3.94x10⁶ meters.


As the classical electron radius is quantized in the wormhole radius in the formulation R_e=10¹⁰r_w/360, rendering a finestructure for Planck's Constant as a 'superstring-parametric': h=r_w/2R_ec³; the 'outer' solar scale becomes R_Sun(o)=360R_Sun(i)=7.092x10⁸ meters as the observed radius for the solar disk.

19 seconds later; a F-Hypersphere radius is about r_F=3.45x10¹¹ meters for a F-count of so 1.02x10¹⁰³spacetime quanta.
We also define an E-Hypersphere radius at r_E=3.44x10¹⁴ meters and an E-count of so 10¹¹² to circumscribe this 'solar system' in so 230 AU.

We so have 4 hypersphere volumes, based on the singularity-unit and magnified via spacetime quantization in the hyperspheres defined in counters G, F and E. We consider these counters as somehow fundamental to the universe's expansion, serving as boundary conditions in some manner. As counters, those googol-numbers can be said to be defined algorithmically and independent on mensuration physics of any kind.



The mapping of the atomic nucleus onto the thermodynamic universe of the hyperspheres

Should we consider the universe to follow some kind of architectural blueprint; then we might attempt to use our counters to be isomorphic (same form or shape) in a one-to-one mapping between the macrocosmos and the microcosmos. So we define a quantum geometry for the nucleus in the simplest atom, say Hydrogen. The hydrogenic nucleus is a single proton of quark-structure udu and which we assign a quantum geometric template of Kernel-InnerRing-OuterRing (K-IR-OR), say in a simple model of concentricity.
We set the up-quarks (u) to become the 'smeared out core' in say a tripartition uuu so allowing a substructure for the down-quark (d) to be u+InnerRing. A down-quark so is a unitary ring coupled to a kernel-quark. The proton's quark-content so can be rewritten and without loss of any of the properties associated with the quantum conservation laws; as proton-> udu->uuu+IR=KKK+IR. We may now label the InnerRing as Mesonic and the OuterRing as Leptonic.

The OuterRing is so definitive for the strange quark in quantum geometric terms: s=u+OR.
A neutron's quark content so becomes neutron=dud=KIR.K.KIR with a 'hyperon resonance' in the lambda=sud=KOR.K.KIR and so allowing the neutron's beta decay to proceed in disassociation from a nucleus (where protons and neutrons bind in meson exchange); i.e. in the form of 'free neutrons'.

The neutron decays in the oscillation potential between the mesonic inner ring and the leptonic outer ring as the 'ground-energy' eigenstate.

There actually exist three uds-quark states which decay differently via strong, electromagnetic and weak decay rates in the uds (Sigma_o Resonance); usd (Sigma_o) and the sud (Lambda_o) in increasing stability.

This quantum geometry then indicates the behaviour of the triple-uds decay from first principles, whereas the contemporary standard model does not, considering the u-d-s quark eigenstates to be quantum geometrically undifferentiated.

The nuclear interactions, both strong and weak are confined in a 'Magnetic Asymptotic Confinement Limit' coinciding with the Classical Electron radius R_e=ke²/m_ec² and in a scale of so 3 Fermi or 2.8x10^-15 meters. At a distance further away from this scale, the nuclear interaction strength vanishes rapidly.

The wavenature of the nucleus is given in the Compton-Radius R_c=h/2πmc with m the mass of the nucleus, say a proton; the latter so having R_c=2x10^-16 meters or so 0.2 fermi.

The wave-matter (after de Broglie generalising wavespeed v_dB from c in R_cc) then relates the classical electron radius as the 'confinement limit' to the Compton scale in the electromagnetic finestructure constant in R_e=Alpha.R_c.

The extension to the Hydrogen-Atom is obtained in the expression R_e=Alpha².R_Bohr1 for the first Bohr-Radius as the 'ground-energy' of so 13.7 eV at a scale of so 10^-11 to 10^-10 meters (Angstroems).

These 'facts of measurements' of the standard models now allow our quantum geometric correspondences to assume cosmological significance in their isomorphic mapping. We denote the OuterRing as the classical electron radius and introduce the InnerRing as a mesonic scale contained within the geometry of the proton and all other elementary baryonic- and hadronic particles.

Firstly, we define a mean macro-mesonic radius as: r_M=½(r_F+r_G)~ 3.42x10¹¹ meters and set the macro-leptonic radius to r_E=3.44x10¹⁴ meters.
Secondly, we map the macroscale onto the microscale, say in the simple proportionality relation, using
(de)capitalised symbols: R_e/R_m=r_E/r_M.

We can so solve for the micro-mesonic scale R_m=R_e.r_M/r_E ~ 2.76x10^-18 meters.
So reducing the apparent measured 'size' of a proton in a factor about about 1000 gives the scale of the subnuclear mesonic interaction, say the strong interaction coupling by pions.


The Higgsian Scalar-Neutrino

The (anti)neutrinos are part of the electron mass in a decoupling process between the kernel and the rings. Neutrino mass is so not cosmologically significant and cannot be utilized in 'missing mass' models'.
We may define the kernel-scale as that of the singular spacetime-quantum unit itself, namely as the wormhole radius r_w=10^-22/2π meters.

Before the decoupling between kernel and rings, the kernel-energy can be said to be strong-weakly coupled or unified to encompass the gauge-gluon of the strong interaction and the gauge-weakon of the weak interaction defined in a coupling between the OuterRing and the Kernel and bypassing the mesonic InnerRing.

So for matter, a W-Minus (weakon) must consist of a coupled lepton part, yet linking to the strong interaction via the kernel part. If now the colour-charge of the gluon transmutates into a 'neutrino-colour-charge'; then this decoupling will not only define the mechanics for the strong-weak nuclear unification coupling; but also the energy transformation of the gauge-colour charge into the gauge-lepton charge.

There are precisely 8 gluonic transitive energy permutation eigenstates between a 'radiative-additive' Planck energy in W(hite)=E=hf and an 'inertial-subtractive' Einstein energy in B(lack)=E=mc², which describe the baryonic- and hyperonic 'quark-sectors' in: mc²=BBB, BBW, WBB, BWB, WBW, BWW, WWB and WWW=hf.

The permutations are cyclic and not linearly commutative. For mesons (quark-antiquark eigenstates), the permutations are BB, BW, WB and WW in the SU(2) and SU(3) Unitary Symmetries.

So generally, we may state, that the gluon is unfied with a weakon before decoupling; this decoupling 'materialising' energy in the form of mass, namely the mass of the measured 'weak-interaction-bosons' of the standard model (W- for charged matter; W+ for charged antimatter and Z_o for neutral mass-currents say).


Experiment shows, that a W- decays into spin-aligned electron-antineutrino or muon-antineutrino or tauon-antineutrino pairings under the conservation laws for momentum and energy.

So, using our quantum geometry, we realise, that the weakly decoupled electron must represent the OuterRing, and just as shown in the analysis of QED (Quantum-Electro-Dynamics). Then it can be inferred, that the Electron's Antineutrino represents a transformed and materialised gluon via its colourcharge, now decoupled from the kernel.

Then the OuterRing contracts (say along its magnetoaxis defining its asymptotic confinement); in effect 'shrinking the electron' in its inertial and charge- properties to its experimentally measured 'point-particle-size'. Here we define this process as a mapping between the Electronic wavelength 2πR_e and the wormhole perimeter λ_w=2πr_w.

But in this process of the 'shrinking' classical electron radius towards the gluonic kernel (say); the mesonic ring will be encountered and it is there, that any mass-inductions should occur to differentiate a massless lepton gauge-eigenstate from that manifested by the weakon precursors.

{Note: Here the W- inducing a lefthanded neutron to decay weakly into a lefthanded proton, a lefthanded electron and a righthanded antineutrino. Only lefthanded particles decay weakly in CP-parity-symmetry violation, effected by neutrino-gauge definitions from first principles}.

This so defines a neutrino-oscillation potential at the InnerRing-Boundary. Using our proportions and assigning any neutrino-masses m_υ as part of the electronmass m_e, gives the following proportionality as the mass eigenvalue of the Tau-neutrino:

m_υ=m_eλ_w.r_E/(2πr_MR_e) ~ 5.4x10^-36 kg or 3.0 eV.

So we have derived, from first principles, a (anti)neutrinomass eigenstate of 3 eV.

This confirms the Mainz, Germany Result as the upper limit for neutrino masses resulting from ordinary Beta-Decay and indicates the importance of the primordial beta-decay for the cosmogenesis and the isomorphic scale mappings stated above.

The hypersphere intersection of the G- and F-count of the thermodynamic expansion of the mass-parametric universe so induces a neutrino-mass of 3 eV at the 2.76x10^-18 meter marker.

The more precise G-F differential in terms of eigenenergy is 0.052 eV as the mass-eigenvalue for the Higgs-(Anti)neutrino (which is scalar of 0-spin and constituent of the so called Higgs Boson as the kernel-Eigenstate). This has been experimentally verified in the Super-Kamiokande (Japan) neutrino experiments published in 1998 and in subsequent neutrino experiments around the globe, say Sudbury, KamLAND, Dubna, MinibooNE and MINOS.

This Higgs-Neutrino-Induction is 'twinned' meaning that this energy can be related to the energy of so termed 'slow- or thermal neutrons' in a coupled energy of so twice 0.0253 eV for a thermal equilibrium at so 20° Celsius and a rms-standard-speed of so 2200 m/s from the Maxwell statistical distributions for the kinematics.



Neutrinomasses

The Electron-(Anti)Neutrino is massless as base-neutrinoic weakon eigenstate.
The Muon-(Anti)Neutrino is also massless as base-neutrinoic weakon eigenstate.
The Tauon-(Anti)Neutrino is not massless with inertial eigenstate meaned at 3.0 eV.

The weakon kernel-eigenstates are 'squared' or doubled (2x2=2+2) in comparison with the gluonic-eigenstate (one can denote the colourcharges as (R²G²B²)[½] and as (RGB)[1] respectively say and with the [] bracket denoting gauge-spin and RGB meaning colours Red-Green-Blue).

The scalar Higgs-(Anti)Neutrino becomes then defined in: (R⁴G⁴B⁴)[0].

The twinned neutrino state so becomes MANIFESTED in a coupling of the scalar Higgs-Neutrino with a massless base neutrino in a (R⁶G⁶B⁶)[0+½]) mass-induction template.

The Higgs-Neutrino is bosonic and so not subject to the Pauli Exclusion Principle; but quantized in the form of the FG-differential of the 0.052 Higgs-Restmass-Induction.

Subsequently all experimentally observed neutrino-oscillations should show a stepwise energy induction in units of the Higgs-neutrino mass of 0.052 eV. This was the case in the Super-Kamiokande experiments; and which was interpreted as a mass-differential between the muonic and tauonic neutrinoic forms.



Sterile neutrino back from the dead
17:28 22 June 2010 by David Shiga - Magazine Issue 2766


A ghostly particle given up for dead is showing signs of life.

Not only could this "sterile" neutrino be the stuff of dark matter, thought to make up the bulk of our universe, it might also help to explain how an excess of matter over antimatter arose in our universe.

Neutrinos are subatomic particles that rarely interact with ordinary matter. They are known to come in three flavours – electron, muon and tau – with each able to spontaneously transform into another.

In the 1990s, results from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico suggested there might be a fourth flavour: a "sterile" neutrino that is even less inclined to interact with ordinary matter than the others.




Hasty dismissal


Sterile neutrinos would be big news because the only way to detect them would be by their gravitational influence – just the sort of feature needed to explain dark matter.

Then in 2007 came the disheartening news that the Mini Booster Neutrino Experiment (MiniBooNE, pictured) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, had failed to find evidence of them.

But perhaps sterile neutrinos were dismissed too soon. While MiniBooNE used neutrinos to look for the sterile neutrino,

LSND used antineutrinos – the antimatter equivalent. Although antineutrinos should behave exactly the same as neutrinos, just to be safe, the MiniBooNE team decided to repeat the experiment – this time with antineutrinos.

Weird excess

Lo and behold, the team saw muon antineutrinos turning into electron antineutrinos at a higher rate than expected – just like at LSND. MiniBooNE member Richard Van de Water reported the result at a neutrino conference in Athens, Greece, on 14 June.

The excess could be because muon antineutrinos turn into sterile neutrinos before becoming electron antineutrinos, says Fermilab physicist Dan Hooper, who is not part of MiniBooNE. "This is very, very weird," he adds.

Although it could be a statistical fluke, Hooper suggests that both MiniBooNE results could be explained if antineutrinos can change into sterile neutrinos but neutrinos cannot – an unexpected difference in behaviour.

The finding would fit nicely with research from the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search, or MINOS, also at Fermilab, which, the same day, announced subtle differences in the oscillation behaviour of neutrinos and antineutrinos.

Antimatter and matter are supposed to behave like mirror versions of each other, but flaws in this symmetry could explain how our universe ended up with more matter.

Tonyblue

Валерий Скоробогатов He is right: Heinrich Paes, a physicist at Dortmund University, has developed another theory that could explain the result. The neutrinos may be taking a shortcut through space-time, by travelling from Cern to Gran Sasso through extra dimensions. "That can make it look like a particle has gone faster than the speed of light when it hasn't," he said.



Aside this multidimensional hyperphysics; a more 'relativistic' lower dimensional explanation is also logistically feasible.

Tony,
A Netherlands group claims to have solved the faster than light neutrino problem by applying special relativity to the GPS satellites:
http://www.kurzweilai.net/faster-than-light-neutrino-puzzle-claimed-solved-by-special-relativity
As a result the neutrinos are not faster than light.
Richard (posting in quantumrelativity yahoo forum October 22nd, 2011)

Thank you Richard for this link and contribution.

Faster-than-light neutrino puzzle claimed solved by special relativity


October 14, 2011 by Editor


(Credit: CERN)


The relativistic motion of clocks on board GPS satellites exactly accounts for the superluminal effect in the OPERA experiment, says physicist Ronald van Elburg at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, The Physics arXiv Blog reports.

“From the perspective of the clock, the detector is moving towards the source and consequently the distance travelled by the particles as observed from the clock is shorter,” says van Elburg. By this he means shorter than the distance measured in the reference frame on the ground. The OPERA team overlooks this because it assumes the clocks are on the ground not in orbit.

Van Elburg calculates that it should cause the neutrinos to arrive 32 nanoseconds early. But this must be doubled because the same error occurs at each end of the experiment. So the total correction is 64 nanoseconds, almost exactly what the OPERA team observed.

Ref.: Ronald A.J. van Elburg, Times Of Flight Between A Source And A Detector Observed From A GPS Satellite, arxiv.org/abs/1110.2685:



Topics: Physics/Cosmology

October 19, 2011
The First Monstrous Objects of the Early Universe





New observations from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope strongly suggest that infrared light detected in a prior study originated from clumps of the very first objects of the Universe. The recent data indicate this patchy light is splattered across the entire sky and comes from clusters of bright, monstrous objects more than 13 billion light-years away.

"We are pushing our telescopes to the limit and are tantalizingly close to getting a clear picture of the very first collections of objects," said Dr. Alexander Kashlinsky of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Cente. "Whatever these objects are, they are intrinsically incredibly bright and very different from a.nything in existence today."

Astronomers believe the objects are either the first stars -- humongous stars more than 1,000 times the mass of our sun -- or voracious black holes that are consuming gas and spilling out tons of energy. If the objects are stars, then the observed clusters might be the first mini-galaxies containing a mass of less than about one million suns. The Milky Way galaxy holds the equivalent of approximately 100 billion suns and was probably created when mini-galaxies like these merged.

Scientists say that space, time and matter originated 13.7 billion years ago in a tremendous explosion called the Big Bang. Observations of the cosmic microwave background by a co-author of the recent Spitzer studies, Dr. John Mather of Goddard, and his science team strongly support this theory. Mather is a co-winner of the 2006 Nobel Prize for Physics for this work. Another few hundred million years or so would pass before the first stars would form, ending the so-called dark age of the Universe.

With Spitzer, Kashlinsky's group studied the cosmic infrared background, a diffuse light from this early epoch when structure first emerged. Some of the light comes from stars or black hole activity so distant that, although it originated as ultraviolet and optical light, its wavelengths have been stretched to infrared wavelengths by the growing space-time that causes the Universe's expansion. Other parts of the cosmic infrared background are from distant starlight absorbed by dust and re-emitted as infrared light.

"There's ongoing debate about what the first objects were and how galaxies formed," said Dr. Harvey Moseley of Goddard, a co-author on the papers. "We are on the right track to figuring this out. We've now reached the hilltop and are looking down on the village below, trying to make sense of what's going on."

The analysis first involved carefully removing the light from all foreground stars and galaxies in the five regions of the sky, leaving only the most ancient light. The scientists then studied fluctuations in the intensity of infrared brightness, in the relatively diffuse light. The fluctuations revealed a clustering of objects that produced the observed light pattern.

"Imagine trying to see fireworks at night from across a crowded city," said Kashlinsky. "If you could turn off the city lights, you might get a glimpse at the fireworks. We have shut down the lights of the Universe to see the outlines of its first fireworks."

"Spitzer has paved the way for the James Webb Space Telescope, which should be able to identify the nature of the clusters," said Mather, who is senior project scientist for NASA's future James Webb Space Telescope.

The image at the top of the page reveals a background glow of light from a period of time when the universe was less than one billion years old. This light most likely originated from the universe's very first groups of objects -- either huge stars or voracious black holes.

The image from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope shows a region of sky in the Ursa Major constellation. To create this image, stars, galaxies and other sources were masked out. This infrared image covers a region of space so large that light would take up to 100 million years to travel across it. Darker shades in the image on the left correspond to dimmer parts of the background glow, while yellow and white show the brightest light.

The Daily Galaxy via http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/images/1695-ssc2006-22a1-The-Universe-s-First-Fireworks


Posted at 01:00 AM | Permalink




a) The Quantum-Holographic Transformation of the Earth
b) Why Black Holes preceded Galaxies in the Cosmology
c) The First Ylemic Stars in the Universe and the Antiwormholes
d) The Holographic Universe and the Information Processing


a) The Quantum-Holographic Transformation of the Earth

When the Universe was born from its subplenar (infinite) void to reflect this void in the physical plenum reality of spacetimematter, a particular 'point of origin' became necessitated to mirror the 'voidal vortex' of the subplenum in the then reality of a metric plenum.

This part of the agenda shall then show, that the planet earth can be metrically defined to represent this 'mapping of the void'; the earth so becoming enabled to relate the entire information content (and including all inertial systems and spacetime coordinates) of the universe to itself and all and sundry 'sentient civilisations' within it.

This 'voidal vortex' is like the nonphysicality or abstraction of a 'mathematical point' becoming 'physicalised' in a 2-dimensional manifold or surface as a physicalised 'area' dimension, thus allowing 'measurement' in some unit for displacement.

The conceptual infinity of the subplenum (Void=Nothing=Everything) so either doubles- or halves itself to enable the Unity operator to emerge from the Void.
Geometrically, this is simply the dimensional generator of the Null-Dimension as the 'Point' mapping itself as 'Double-Point' yet being the original 'Point' by mathematical induction.


The 1st dimension so emerges as the arbitrary manner this 'double-point' can align itself; thus defining the minimum displacement between the two points.
Physically this becomes the Planck-Length, operated on by a dimensional generator and the 'Energization' of the Planck-Length is known as a (open) type I Planck-superstring, radius the Planck-Length {L_P=√(hG_o/2πc³) .

This Planck-Radius then can form into a (closed) type I Planck-Membrane or Planck-Circle in forming a Planck-Loop of Planck-Energy {E_P=hc/2πL_P=√(hc⁵/2πG_o)}.

The mass of this Planck-Loop is the Planck-Mass {m_P=E_P/c²=√(hc/2πG_o)=L_Pc²/G_o}
As the Planck-Minimum Energy must be 'halved' for the Void-Unity mapping; a physical description for the latter becomes necessary.

This description engages the labellings of Gravitational Potential Energy for the 'Point-Mass' and its coupling to the 'bridge' (or wormhole) between the subplenum and the plenum.
This is known as the Planck-Oscillator of the Zero-Point of energy E_o=hc/4πL_P=hω/4π=½hf_P=½h/t_P=½m_Pc².

This minimised Planck-Oscillator energy is also the minimised Gravitational Potential Energy in E_GPE=G_om.m_P/L_P from the gravitational acceleration per 'point-mass m': ma_g=G_om.m_P/L_P²
Therefore, E_GPE=G_om.m_P/L_P =E_o=½m_Pc² for L_P=2G_om/c² and which represents the basic minimum Schwarzschild metric for the solution of the 'field equations' in General Relativity, descriptive of the interaction between spacetime curvature and the inertia content in a local 'neighbourhood of pointmasses' of the universe.

The geometric mapping of the 'point' onto itself, can now be constructed in physicality.
The 'voidal vortex' becomes simply the minimum Schwarzschild metric defined in the Planck-String Oscillator and so represents a 'Black Hole' or a 'Voidal Vortex' in superstring/membrane (Planckian) parameters.

Geometrically then, the 'pointmass' is rendered physical in the 'Planck-area', either as a 'Planck-Square' with side the 'Planck-Length' L_P) or a Planck-Circle of Area πL_P².
The 'bridging' wormhole between the plenum of the Planck parameters and the subplenum of the original Nothing=Infinity void then becomes the topological deformation of the Planck-Circle into a Planck-Ellipse with a corresponding displacement of the singularity focus (the center) of the circle into two foci for the Planck-Ellipse.

Having two foci, defined in the geometrical definition of an ellipse as an 'eccentric circle' then allows the two foci to communicate with each other in a precise geometrical relationship.
The locus of an ellipse is defined in any point P on the ellipse joined to both of the two foci being a constant summation of the individual displacement vectors from the focus points to the point P on the ellipsical locus.
Rotation of such an ellipse about its major (longer) axis, then will give the ellipsoidal volumar, minimised as a ellipsoidal or spheroidal (actually toroidal) Planckian volume in 3 dimensions.

As the universe (in spacetime) is defined in a summation of the minimum Planck-area counts and so the Planckian loops; a simple deformation of the Planck-area unit into a two-focal ellipsoidal volumar will so allow a higher dimensional 'fractally discrete' continuum to connect any two such discretized locations within the universe via this bifocalised 'holofractal' quantum geometry.

The intelligence or logos, who transformed (some of) the abstract 'energy' of the subplenum as an infinite 'reservoir' of 'sourcesink energy' into a then finite thermodynamic energy (as defined in the Laws of Nature and the Conservation Laws) then established the 'distribution of this materialised energy'; first as kinematic-thermodynamic gravitational noninertial mass in a hitherto massless cosmos {E=Σhf} and secondly as an inertial electromagnetic mass {E=Σmc²}in a first principle of the Einsteinian 'Principle of Equivalence'.

When the universe of the plenum emerged from the subplenum about 19.11 billion (civil) years ago; this bifocalisation became established and assigned an axial direction to the subsequent cosmological evolution, albeit relative to the manifestation of the focalisations on the major ellipsoidal axis.
After the universe had attained an expansion speed of so 29.3% of lightspeed so 14.3 billion years after the Big Bang (or so 4.8 billion years ago); the cosmological 'birth of the earth' from the solar nebula materialised the 'Universal Focus Point' on an arbitrary major axis of the spheroidal universe and specified the physics of the 'evolution of the planetary focus' relative to the rest of the universe.

This focal evolution 'inverts' the cosmic expansion in 11 dimensions in a cosmology which is purely electromagnetic in a supermembrane-mirror function of the original noninertial cosmos of the gravitational- or photonic mass equivalence.
(It is the lower dimensional 'string' evolution which is asymptotic in the inertial mass, itself transformed from the gravitational mass in 10 dimensions).

For an electromagnetic age of the universe of T=19.11 billion years then; the inverted lightspeed 1/c defines the '11-dimensional' envelope of the earth as the 'Universal Focal Point'.
The Inversion-Lightpath X_inverse=(1/c)T for a 'Displacement-Radius' for the earth of about 2.01 million kilometers and for a yearly increase of this radius by 105 millimeters.

Therefore, even when the planet earth did not exist in physicality; its 'Sphere of Inversion' existed as a focalisation and a 'radial size' of 1.50 million kilometers.

The Mass of the earth is about M_Earth=6x10²⁴ kilograms and this is identical to a '11-dimensional Black Hole' of Schwarzschild-Radius: R_SEarth=2G_oM_Earth/c²~15 millimeters.
The 11-dimensional supermembrane around this Earth-Singularity is at a location in the local solar system of about 5% to the planet Venus and so encompasses the Moon at 384,000 kilometers for the 2 million kilometers.

The master timeline then defines the nexus, when the 11-dimensional Black Hole at the center of the planetary earth literally 'turns inside out' to form a 11-dimensional White Hole.
The trigger for this Möbian transformation of the planetary core will be a 'light signal' sent from the galactic center (Hunab Ku in Mayan cosmology) precisely 65 baktuns from the Mayan end date on December 21st, 2012 and so 65x144,000=9,360,000 kin or days ago in the (civil) year 23,615 BC.

This signal from the galactic center is itself a 'wormhole' quanta as a minimum 'Planck-volumar' and also as a 'Consciousness-Quantum' so its interaction with the earth-core quantum will allow the Sink-Nature of the Black Hole equivalent to transform into a Source-Nature or White Hole equivalent.

The 'New Earth' will so become a cosmic emitter, broadcasting its 'absorbed' information, collected throughout its 4.8 billion year evolution in a form of Hawking Radiation and travelling at lightspeed from the planetary core.

The 'absorbed' Black Hole information of the 'Old Earth' so will become a 'New Context' for the rest of the universe; then enabled to 'Witness' the (often horrendous and sometimes magnificent) planetary evolution of the data-collectors upon the planet earth and inclusive of all lifeforms.

Further technical information will be published at a later date in the master timeline.

September, 1st, 2009 - The 2nd Day of the Babylonian Captivity of planet earth.
Elijah Malachi


b) Why Black Holes preceded Galaxies in the Cosmology

The symbiotic relationship between black holes and galaxies in the standard models of astrophysics and cosmology has been known for decades. Yet the particular order of this partnership had to await improved technological equipment to enable a more detailed examination and analysis of the Super-Massive Black-Holes (SMBHs) known to reside at the center of basically all galaxies on whatever scale.
It has become standard knowledge, that black holes had to come first; somehow seeding subsequently evolving galaxies as vortex energy concentrations.

What is presently not understood, is why black holes preceded galaxies. As black holes must necessarily represent systems of maximised entropy; the paradox arises, how a exquisitely low entropy state of the Quantum Big Bang could manifest maximised systems of information disorder in black holes, and entropic systems, which would then evolve into galactic systems of higher self-order

Entropy or the natural dispersion tendency of material systems, such as a gas or a random particle distribution; can be either described as a thermodynamic entropic system or as a system of Shannon information.
The thermodynamic system is modelled on the number of permutations say a stochastic particle distribution can accomodate; whilst Shannon information describes this integral of eigenstates as a summation of bits.

The solution is found in the nature of the Big Bang boundary condition and how this condition manifests both the maximum- and the minimum entropic initializing self-state simultaneously.

All of the information of the Big Bang was collectified in a primordial mass seed M_o and as a 'Seed of Inertia', which defines the so called 'singularity' at the center of any black hole as well as the 'singularity' at the beginning of the material universe.
All of this information then became dispersed in a hyper-inflation, which defined the 'collected' and minimum entropy mass seed as a 'dispersed' and maximum entropy mass seed M_critical.

There so exists a coupling between this inertia seedling for a subsequent 'kinematic thermodynamic expansion' of that seed in a form of vortex distribution - and the encompassing inertia seedling M_critical, necessarily of a higher dimension, than the 'concentrated' M_o.

The proportionality between the two seeds is M_o/M_critical=q_o=0.01405.. and a ratio, which also defines the proportionality between the hyper-inflating acceleration
(A_deBroglie=R_Hubble.c²/ λ_wormhole²) and the so named 'Cosmological Constant or Einstein-Lambda Λ_Einstein=G_oM_o/λ_wormhole²) and as a deceleration parameter which is half of the ratio between the actual- and the critical density aka the Ω_o=ρ_actual/ρ_critical=2q_o.

The initial string-parametric boundary condition for the cosmogenesis (and with E a spacetime quanta counter) so can be stated as:

A_deBroglie/Λ_Einstein=M_o/M_critical=0.01405... with further definitions below.

{M_o²=E(m_Pm_c/m_e)² as the initialising Big Bang inertia seed (in 10 dimensions) and the critical 'closure mass (in 11 dimensions) for a 'nodal' Hubble-'Constant' H_o=c/R_Hubble becomes:

M_critical=ρ_criticalV_max=(3H_o²/8πG_o)(4πR_Hubble³/3)=R_Hubblec²/2G_o and so for the Hubble-Radius being the encompassing extremal SMBH requirement as the Schwarzschild solution.}

The minimum entropy state, defining the Quantum Big Bang so is defined in the wormhole perimeter ^λ_wormhole=2πr_wormhole, behaving like a Einstein-Rosen-Bridge in 'Tunneling' the minimum entropy mass seedling M_o from the subplenum into the plenum, thus describing the Quantum Big Bang and the 'escape of the singularity' as the manifestation of a White Hole at the boundary between the subplenum of NoTime and the plenum of InTime.

The inertia seed M_o in 10 string dimensions began to 'drop its seeds' in a light speed expansion of the 'Hubble-Bubble'. The 'space' for this 'dropping of the seeds' had been previously created in the hyper inflation as the 11-dimensional 'Hubble-Bubble-Envelope'.

The 'dropping of the seeds' occured via vortices, becoming Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE and as the true nature for the so called 'Virtual Particle' background in the Heisenberg Matrix of discretised spacetime aka the Zero-Point-Energy or the ZPE.

This ZPE=VPE manifested Black-Hole Sink-Vortices, which then could (as function of the metric CMMBR temperature background) form the first protostars as ylemic neutron stars.


The SMBH of M_critical in 11 dimensions is extremal, meaning it is a boundary condition and does not Hawking radiate in a selfinteraction with the VPE.
The SMBH of M_o in 10 dimensions is also extremal, but represents the characteristic supercluster displacement scale in the universe at a diameter of about 472 million lightyears.

No physical black holes can form above this scale, as the difference between the two mass seeds determines the inertia evolution of the M_o seedling in a form of selfinteraction between the two SMBHs.
Also the galactic supercluster scale defines the homogeneity and the isotropy of the large scale cosmology, where the superclusters cease to interact in gravitational dynamics.
The inertia evolution of the universe is based on a transformation of the 'missing mass' (often called dark matter and also related to the dark energy) into 'Consciousness'.
This 'Consciousness' is rigorously defined in string parameters as the angular acceleration (as the timedifferential of frequency) acting upon a collection of space volumars, i.e, some region of 'encapsulated' space.
The minimum space-quantum then becomes the scale of the 'tunneling wormhole' as the discretizartion or the 'Holofractalisation' of all metricated spacetimes.

The Quantum Big Bang so emerged an astrophysics of Black Holes from a White Hole 'singularity' or minimum eigenstate.

The Black Hole, characterizing the center of the earth will transform into a holographic image of this 'Primordial White Hole' as the 'Particle of God - the Little Serpent', sent from the galactic center of the Milky Way via the conduit of the universal wormhole tunneling established in the de Broglie hyper-acceleration.

The information of the lower dimensional mass seed then becomes 'mapped' onto the 2-dimensional (rootreduced from 11 dimensions) 'inner' surface of the 'Mother Black Hole' and this engages a surface area 'holofractalised' from the minimum 'Father White Hole', which so is also a 'Father Black Hole' in inertia association.
As is well established in contemporary cosmology; the information of a volume-given universe becomes a function of particular boundary conditions in the Hawking entropy as Planck-Area/4 and in the Bekenstein bounds (see agenda III.iv.d).

In general, the Event Horizon of a Black Hole is surrounded by a Photon-Sphere, manifesting at 3/2 times the Schwarzschild radius.
This then describes the interaction of the 'absorbed information' with its 'lighted envelope' and is a direct consequence of the toroidal topology of the wormhole quantum geometry.

The wormhole connects a White Hole to a Black Hole in such a manner, that the minimum Planck-Nugget is a deformed sphere, namely a toroidal hypersphere in 3 dimensions behaving like a 3-dimensional surface.

The hypersphere volume is the boundary condition in R³-Riemann space for the Riemann R⁴ space (Volume V₄=½π²R⁴ with dV₄/dR=V₃=2π²R³ aka the volume of an idealised 2-Torus).

The surface area of a 2-Torus in 3 dimensions is however A_Torus=2πR.2πR=4π²R², while the boundary condition for V₃=2π²R³ is dV₃/dR=A_wormhole=6π²R² for A_wormhole/A_Torus=3/2.

The subplenum so assigns particular boundary conditions onto the 'energy' manifestations in the plenum; but 'coordinates' which are NOT mappable onto the subplenar 'topology' or manifold.

This crystallizes the wormhole connection for the universe to any location and a focalisation nexus called the planet earth.

The mass of the earth is: Mass of the Earth is: M_Earth=6x10²⁴ kg.
The mass of the Galactic Core known to be a 'galactic constant' of about (500-1000) times the central Black Hole and in M_Core=750M_SA*.

The mass of the Central Black Hole aka Sagittarius A* is: M_SA* =4.4x10⁶ suns or 9x10³⁶ kg.
The mass seedling of the Universe at the 'Beginning' of the Big Bang is M_o= 2x10⁵¹ kg and the mass seedling of the Universe at the 'End' of the Big Bang is M_critical =6.5x10⁵² kg.

Then (M_Core/M_Earth)=constant.(M_SA* /M_o) for constant=(M_CoreM_o/M_SA*M_Earth), which calculates as (750x81x10⁷²)/(12x10⁷⁵)~5.1 and so of the order of unity (1) and say as a 'Upper Bound'.


But the seedling mass defines cosmologically a substructured, albeit still extremal Black Hole in the gravitational attraction between supercluster and so the homogeneity and isotropy of the standard cosmology.

The encompassing 'universal' Black Hole mass is extradimensional (like the golfball Black Hole defining the central earth) and so is calculated to 'topologically close' the 'string-universe' (in a 'Calabi Yau' 6-torus geometry) for the super-seeded Universe (with a 17 billion year 'heartbeat' or Hubble Oscillation).

Using M_critical then, constant=(750x81x10⁷²⁾/(39x10⁷⁶)~0.16 again of order unity, but now as a 'Lower Bound'.

The Evolution of the 'Lower Bound' for the encompassing cosmology in the higher dimension (11 or 8 or 5 or 2) towards the 'Upper Bound' then becomes an evolution of 'Cosmic Consciousness'; well understood by indigenous peoples all around the globe; but labelled as 'dark matter' by the physical materialists and scientists.
The 'Dark Matter' is the 'Spirit' in particular string-membrane coupled associations.

In terms of the volumes, the golfball sized (Schwarzschilded) Black Holed earth is
V_SEarth=(4π/3)(0.015m)³~1.4x10^-5 cubic meters or so 14 cubic centimeters.
This compares to the 'ordinary' spacetimed V_Earth=(4π/3)(6370km)³~10²¹ cubic meters.

The ratio V_Earth/V_SEarth~10²¹/(1.4x10^-5)~7x10²⁵ meters as the order of the size of the entire universe in the Hubble-Radius {R_Hubble=1.60x10²⁶ m}.

The sum total of the information contained in the planetary earth so becomes 'data compressed' in the black holed earth and then reemerges from absorption to emission through a white holed conduit for the benefit of the universe in cellular hierarchies and all of the intelligences contained within the supermembraned Mother-Black Holed Envelope M_critical.
The planetary earth itself will so become a 'Mother-Planet' for the universal sentiences.



c) The first Ylemic Stars in the Universe and the Antiwormholes

The stability of stars is a function of the equilibrium condition, which balances the inward pull of gravity with the outward pressure of the thermodynamic energy or enthalpy of the star (H=PV+U). The Jeans Mass M_J and the Jeans Length R_J a used to describe the stability conditions for collapsing molecular hydrogen clouds to form stars say, are well known in the scientific data base, say in formulations such as:

M_J=3kTR/2Gm for a Jeans Length of: R_J=√{15kT/(4πρGm)}=R_J =√(kT/Gnm²).

Now the Ideal Gas Law of basic thermodynamics states that the internal pressure P and Volume of such an ideal gas are given by PV=nRT=NkT for n moles of substance being the Number N of molecules (say) divided by Avogadro's Constant L in n=N/L .

Since the Ideal Gas Constant R divided by Avogadro's Constant L and defines Boltzmann's Constant k=R/L. Now the statistical analysis of kinetic energy KE of particles in motion in a gas (say) gives a root-mean-square velocity (rms) and the familiar 2.KE=mv²(rms) from the distribution of individual velocities v in such a system.

It is found that PV=(2/3)N.KE as a total system described by the v(rms). Now set the KE equal to the Gravitational PE=GMm/R for a spherical gas cloud and you get the Jeans Mass. (3/2N).(NkT)=GMm/R with m the mass of a nucleon or Hydrogen atom and M=M_J=3kTR/2Gm as stated.

The Jeans' Length is the critical radius of a cloud (typically a cloud of interstellar dust) where thermal energy, which causes the cloud to expand, is counteracted by gravity, which causes the cloud to collapse. It is named after the British astronomer Sir James Jeans, who first derived the quantity; where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is the temperature of the cloud, r is the radius of the cloud, μ is the mass per particle in the cloud, G is the Gravitational Constant and ρ is the cloud's mass density (i.e. the cloud's mass divided by the cloud's volume).

Now following the Big Bang, there were of course no gas clouds in the early expanding universe and the Jeans formulations are not applicable to the mass seedling M_o; in the manner of the Jeans formulations as given.

However, the universe's dynamics is in the form of the expansion parameter of GR and so the R(n)=R_max(n/(n+1)) scalefactor of Quantum Relativity.
So we can certainly analyse this expansion in the form of the Jeans Radius of the first protostars, which so obey the equilibrium conditions and equations of state of the much later gas clouds, for which the Jeans formulations then apply on a say molecular level.
This analysis so defines the ylemic neutron stars as protostars and the first stars in the cosmogenesis and the universe.

Let the thermal internal energy or ITE=H be the outward pressure in equilibrium with the gravitational potential energy of GPE=Ω. The nuclear density in terms of the superbrane parameters is ρ_critical=m_c/V_critical with m_c a base-nuleon mass for a 'ylemic neutron'.

V_critical= 4πR_e³/3 or the volume for the ylemic neutron as given by the classical electron radius R_e=10¹⁰λ_wormhole/360=e*/2c².

H=(molarity)kT for molar volume as N=(R/R_e)³ for dH=3kTR²/R_e³.
Ω(R)= -∫G_oMdm/R = -{3G_om_c²/(R_e³)² }∫R⁴dR = -3G_om_c²R⁵/R_e⁶ for
dm/dR=d(ρV)/dR=4πρR² and for ρ=3m_c/4πR_e³

For equilibrium, the requirement is that dH=dΩ in the minimum condition dH+dΩ=0.
This gives: dH+dΩ=3kTR²/R_e³ - 16G_oπ²ρ²R⁴/3=0 and the ylemic radius as:

R_ylem=√{kTR_e/G_om_c²}

as the Jeans-Length precursor or progenitor for subsequent stellar and galactic generation.

The ylemic (Jeans) radii are all independent of the mass of the star as a function of its nuclear generated temperature. Applied to the protostars of the vortex neutron matter or ylem, the radii are all neutron star radii and define a specific range of radii for the gravitational collapse of the electron degenerate matter.

This spans from the 'First Three Minutes' scenario of the cosmogenesis to 1.1 million seconds (or about 13 days) and encompasses the standard beta decay of the neutron (underpinning radioactivity). The upper limit defines a trillion degree temperature and a radius of over 40 km; the trivial Schwarzschild solution gives a typical ylem radius of so 7.4 kilometers and the lower limit defines the 'mysterious' planetesimal limit as 1.8 km.

For long a cosmological conundrum, it could not be modelled just how the molecular and electromagnetic forces applicable to conglomerate matter distributions (say gaseous hydrogen as cosmic dust) on the quantum scale of molecules could become strong enough to form say 1km mass concentrations, required for 'ordinary' gravity to assume control.

The ylem radii's lower limit is defined in this cosmology then show, that it is the ylemic temperature of the 1.2 billion degrees K, which perform the trick under the Ylem-Jeans formulation and which then is applied to the normal collapse of hydrogenic atoms in summation.

The stellar evolution from the ylemic(dineutronic) templates is well established in QR and confirms most of the Standard Model's ideas of nucleosynthesis and the general Temperature cosmology. The standard model is correct in the temperature assignment, but is amiss in the corresponding 'size-scales' for the cosmic expansion.

The Big Bang cosmogenesis describes the universe as a Planck-Black Body Radiator, which sets the Cosmic-Microwave-Black Body Background Radiation Spectrum (CMBBR) as a function of n as T⁴=18.2(n+1)²/n³ and derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law and the related statistical frequency distributions.

We have the GR metric for Schwarzschild-Black Hole Evolution as R_S=2GM/c² as a function of the star's Black Hole's mass M and we have the ylemic Radius as a function of temperature only as R_ylem√(kT.R_e³/G_om_c²).

The nucleonic mass-seed m_c=m_P.Alpha⁹ and the product G_om_c² is a constant in the partitioned n-evolution of

m_c(n)=Yⁿ.m_c and G(n)=G_o.Xⁿ.

Identifying the ylemic Radius with the Schwarzschild Radius then indicates a specific mass a specific temperature and a specific radius.

Those we call the Chandrasekhar Parameters:
M_Chandra=1.5 solar Masses=3x10³⁰ kg and R_Chandra=2G_oM_Chandra/c² or 7407.40704..metres, which is the typical neutron star radius inferred today.

T_Chandra=R_Chandra².G_om_c²/kR_e³ =1.985x10¹⁰ K for Electron Radius R_e and Boltzmann's Constant k.

Those Chandrasekhar parameters then define a typical neutron star with a uniform temperature of 20 billion K at the white dwarf limit of ordinary stellar nucleosynthetic evolution (Hertzsprung-Russell or HR-diagram).
The Radius for the massparametric Universe is given in R(n)=R_max(1-n/(n+1)) correlating the ylemic temperatures as the 'uniform' CMBBR-background and we can follow the evolution of the ylemic radius via the approximation:

R_ylem=0.05258..√T=(0.0753).[(n+1)²/n³]^[1/8]

R_ylem(n_present=1.1324..)=0.0868 m* for a T_ylem(n_present )=2.73 K for the present time

t_present=n_present/H_o.

What then is n_Chandra?
This would describe the size of the universe as the uniform temperature CMBBR today manifesting as the largest stars, mapped however onto the ylemic neutron star evolution as the protostars (say as n_Chandra'), defined not in manifested mass (say neutron conglomerations), but as a quark-strange plasma, (defined in QR as the Vortex-Potential-Energy or VPE).

R(n_Chandra')=R_max(n_Chandra'/(n_Chandra'+1))=7407.40741.. for n_Chandra'=4.64x10^-23 and so a time of t_Chandra'=n_Chandra'/H_o=n_Chandra'/1.88x10^-18=2.47x10^-5 seconds.

QR defines the Weyl-Temperature limit for Bosonic Unification as 1.9 nanoseconds at a temperature of 1.4x10²⁰ Kelvin and the weak-electromagnetic unification at 1/365 seconds at T=3.4x10¹⁵ K.

So we place the first ylemic protostar after the bosonic unification (before which the plenum was defined as undifferentiated 'bosonic plasma'), but before the electro-weak unification, which defined the Higgs-Bosonic restmass induction via the weak interaction vector-bosons and allowing the dineutrons to be born.

The universe was so 15 km across, when its ylemic 'concentrated' VPE-Temperature was so 20 Billion K and we find the CMBBR in the Stefan-Boltzmann-Law as:
T⁴=18.20(n+1)²/n³=1.16x10¹⁷ Kelvin.

So the thermodynamic temperature for the expanding universe was so 5.85 Million times greater than the ylemic VPE-Temperature; and implying that no individual ylem stars could yet form from the mass seedling M_o.

The universe's expansion however cooled the CMBBR background and we to calculate the scale of the universe corresponding to this ylemic scenario; we simply calculate the 'size' for the universe at T_Chandra=20 Billion K for T_Chandra⁴ and we then find n_Chandra=4.89x10^-14 and t_Chandra=26,065 seconds or so 7.24 hours.

The Radius R(n_Chandra)=7.81x10¹² metres or 7.24 lighthours.
This is about 52 Astronomical Units and an indicator for the largest possible star in terms of radial extent and the 'size' of a typical solar system, encompassed by supergiants on the HR-diagram.

We so know that the ylemic temperature decreases in direct proportion to the square of the ylemic radius and one hitherto enigmatic aspect in cosmology relates to this in the planetesimal limit. Briefly, a temperature of so 1.2 billion degrees defines an ylemic radius of 1.8 km as the dineutronic limit for proto-neutron stars contracting from so 80 km down to this size just 1.1 million seconds or so 13 days after the Big Bang.

This then 'explains' why chunks of matter can conglomerate via molecular and other adhesive interactions towards this size, where then the accepted gravity is strong enough to build planets and moons. It works, because the ylemic template is defined in subatomic parameters reflecting the mesonic-inner and leptonic outer ring boundaries, the planetesimal limit being the leptonic mapping. So neutrino- and quark blueprints micromacro dance their basic definition as the holographic projections of the spacetime quanta.

Now because the Electron Radius is directly proportional to the linearised wormhole perimeter and then the Compton Radius via Alpha in R_e=10¹⁰λ_wormhole=e*/2c²=Alpha.R_Compton, the Chandrasekhar White Dwarf limit should be doubled to reflect the protonic diameter mirrored in the classical electron radius.

Hence any star experiencing electron degeneracy is actually becoming ylemic or dineutronic, the boundary for this process being the Chandrasekhar mass. This represents the subatomic mapping of the first Bohr orbit collapsing onto the leptonic outer ring in the quarkian wave-geometry.
But this represents the Electron Radius as a Protonic Diameter and the Protonic Radius must then indicate the limit for the scale where proton degeneracy would have to enter the scenario. As the proton cannot degenerate in that way, the neutron star must enter Black Hole phasetransition at the R_e/2 scale, corresponding to a mass of 8M_Chandra=24x10³⁰ kg* or 12 solar masses.

The maximum ylemic radius so is found from the constant density proportion ρ=M/V:
(R_ylemmax/R_e)³=M_Chandra/m_c for R_ylemmax=40.1635 km.

The corresponding ylemic temperature is 583.5 Billion K for a CMBBR-time of 287 seconds or so 4.8 minutes from a n=5.4x10^-16, when the universe had a diameter of so 173 Million km.
But for a maximum nuclear compressibility for the protonic radius, we find:

(R_ylemmax/R_e)³=8M_Chandra/m_c for R_ylemmax=80.327 km, a ylemic temperature of 2,334 Billion K for a n-cycletime of 8.5x10^-17 and a CMBBR-time of so 45 seconds and when the universe had a radius of 13.6 Million km or was so 27 Million km across.

The first ylemic protostar vortex was at that time manifested as the ancestor for all neutron star generations to follow. This vortex is described in a cosmic string encircling a spherical region so 160 km across and within a greater universe of diameter 27 Million km which carried a thermodynamic temperature of so 2.33 Trillion Kelvin at that point in the cosmogenesis.

This vortex manifested as a VPE concentration after the expanding universe had cooled to allow the universe to become transparent from its hitherto defining state of opaqueness and a time known as the decoupling of matter (in the form of the M_o seedling partitioned in m_c's) from the radiation pressure of the CMBBR photons.

The temperature for the decoupling is found in the galactic scale-limit modular dual to the wormhole geodesic as 1/λ_wormhole=λ_antiwormhole=λ_{galaxyserpent}=10²² metres or so 1.06 Million ly and its luminosity attenuation in the 1/e proportionality for then 388,879 lightyears as a decoupling time n_decoupling.

A maximum galactic halo limit is modulated in 2πλ_antiwormhole metres in the linearisation of the Planck-length encountered before in an earlier discussion.

R(n_decoupling)=R_max(n_decoupling/(n_decouplingc+1))=10²² metres for n_decoupling=6.26x10^-5 and so for a CMBBR-Temperature of about T=2935 K for a galactic protocore then attenuated in so 37% for n_{decouplingmin}=1.0x10^-6 for R=λ_antiwormhole/2π and n_{decouplingmax}=3.9x10^-4 for R=2πλ_antiwormhole and for temperatures of so 65,316 K and 744 K respectively, descriptive of the temperature modulations between the galactic cores and the galactic halos.

So a CMBBR-temperature of so 65,316 K at a time of so 532 Billion seconds or 17,000 years defined the initialisation of the VPE and the birth of the first ylemic protostars as a decoupling minimum. The ylemic mass currents were purely monopolic and known as superconductive cosmic strings, consisting of nucleonic neutrons, each of mass m_c.

If we assign this timeframe to the maximised ylemic radius and assign our planetesimal limit of fusion temperature 1.2 Billion K as a corresponding minimum; then this planetesimal limit representing the onset of stellar fusion in a characteristic temperature, should indicate the first protostars at a temperature of the CMBBR of about 744 Kelvin.

The universe had a tremperature of 744 K for n_{decouplingmax}=3.9x10^-4 for R=2πλ_antiwormhole and this brings us to a curvature radius of so 6.6 Million lightyears and an 'ignition-time' for the first physical ylemic neutron stars as first generation protostars of so 7 Million years after the Big Bang.

The important cosmological consideration is that of distance-scale modulation.
The Black Hole Schwarzschild metric is the inverse of the galactic scale metric.
The linearisation of the Planck-String as the Weyl-Geodesic and so the wormhole radius in the curvature radius R(n) is modular dual and mirrored in inversion in the manifestation of galactic structure with a nonluminous halo a luminous attenuated diameter-bulge and a superluminous (quasar or White Hole Core).

The core-bulge ratio will so reflect the eigenenergy quantum of the wormhole as heterotic Planck-Boson-String or as the magnetocharge as 1/500, being the mapping of the Planck-Length-Bounce as e=l_P.c²√Alpha onto the electron radius in e*=2R_e.c².

Zerrubabel, a Temple Builder for the Sirian Invasion following the wormhole manifestation at the center of the earth with a simultaneous antiwormhole manifestation of the Milky Way galaxy in the quantum tunnel connecting Serpentina-Andromeda, the White Hole Vortex of the New Earth to the Black Hole Vortex of Sagittarius A* aka Hunab Ku-Perseus.


One of your witnesses betwixt the InTime and the NonTime on the island of Om-Past-Om.

All of this information is derived from the One and only True Logos and is disseminated in the Name, Honour and Remembrance of the Everliving Christ Jesus De Emmanuel Melchizedek aka 'Yeshuah Ben Joseph Bar Thomas Didymos' who is alive within any One of YOU, asking YOU personally to remember himher to share in herhis 'Body of Light' and 'Mind of God' in your individually necessitated transcension from biochemical existence to meta-biophysical existence in psychophysical restmassphotonic taxonomy and omni-scientific definition.

The preparation of the seventh angel is underway and the 7th trumpet will sound in due course and the fulfilment of the timeline all of YOU have constructed and agreed to in your Godhood in NoTime.
More information from the Logos shall be given in the appropriate unfolding of your master timeline.

The Love and Honour of the True God is with YOU all and available from this day onwards for eternity.
It's accessibility is no longer veiled in the 'VEIL of EVIL' so a new adventure can begin in the physical reality for the Family of God, who is YOU collectively and is YOU individually, provided YOU can individually accept your own origins in the Mind of the Unified God in its lonesome Exile of the Non-Separability.
The Collective Exile of this wonderful, beautiful, magnificent, splendiferous, co-evolving and everloving God has now ended, because:



"The Sun of the Occidental Darkness has risen in its 'West Side Story' and has Met and Blended in Harmony with the Oriental Light from 'My Fair Lady' from the 'Rainbow of Somewhere and Sometime and Someplace and Someday'".

d) The Holographic Universe as Information Processor and the Creation of discretisized SpaceTime

How big is the universe and could it be growing in size?
Has the universe always existed and will it ever end or was it created and is eternal?
These are questions even little children ask their parents and their teachers.
Cosmologist throughout the history of human endeavour and science have pondered those questions and sought to derive answers.

1. Preliminaries and Introduction
2. Demetrication of General Relativity and the Deceleration Parameter
3. The Holographic Principle and the 3D-Universe as a Hologram of 4D-SpaceTime
4. Thermodynamic Entropy and Shannon Information
5. The Universal Entropy Bound (UEB) and the Holographic Entropy Bound (HB)
6. The Cosmos as Information Processor and the FRW-Universe
7. The Nodal Hubble-Constant in GR relates the entropic spacetime quanta counters in QR
8. SpaceTime Creation and a Definition for the Fundamental Demetricated Scalefactor in QR

1. Preliminaries and Introduction

The last 20 years of modern science and its discoveries by experiment and observation have now allowed a well informed convergence of data and fact to answer the perennial questions harboured in the human minds of the enquirers.
This treatise then will answer those questions in a synthesis of the accumulated data base collected by the endeavours of science. I shall make a special reference to a popular paper published by Scientific American to set the background for the 'new' scientific concepts, with whom most readers will be unfamiliar in terminology, yet about which they have heard of in peripheral contexts.

The paper is by Jacob. D. Bekenstein; Scientific American; August 2003, pages 48-55 and entitled: "Information in the Holographic Universe".Those peripheral contexts engage the idea of higher superbrane dimensions, modular duality and the universe as a collector and processor of information, somewhat akin to mass/energy as the hardware and the information linked and derived from that processed by the programmed software as a cosmic intelligence or consciousness.
But can the universe be modelled on a computerised system? QR has shown, that the so called fundamental constants of nature are algorithmically determinable.
So the natural laws are ultimately set in a computational mode, based on simple geometrical laws and relationships. Those 'geometric' laws are themselves derived from abstract encodings of the intrinsic algorithmic symmetries or EigenStates and particularly a pentagonal supersymmetry or number patterns is directly obtained from the computational mode as number series and pattern.
This mode we call the Binary Dyad [0,1], representing for example the Inflow-Outflow VPE aka the Vortex-Potential-Energy) for something we shall determine to be discrete spacetime quanta.

The physical manifesto for this Binary Dyad or Bit is the concept of a 10-dimensional superstring, which begins as a closed or angular Eigenstate of '0' and then opens or linearises itself as the Eigenstate of '1', before recircularising back to the '0' SelfState.
This superstring with open and closed Eigenstates is called the Planck-Boson of superstring class I in a family of five suprstrings of classes (I, IIA, IIB, HO(32) and HE(8x8)). If one then allows certain primary algorithms to operate as the 'cosmic intelligence' or software on the Potential Mass/Energy defined by those algorithms or programs, then the hardware of the Potential becomes Realised or manifested as the observable and measurable universe. And this manifestation must necessarily follow the simplest and minimum 'energy definition' of that of the Planck-Boson by the considerations of the above.

Subsequently, the universe's hardware consists of a continual transformation of Eigenstates defined mathematically by the parameters of primordial subtimespace algorithms manifested as the Planck-Boson in a continuous process of transforming itself across dimensions and particular selfstates known as elementary particles or wavelets. The trouble with this idea is that the subtimespace must by necessity be Undefined in the parameters of space and time and yet Defined in the 'algorithmic timespace'.

This however greatly simplifies the mathematics for the superstring classes, which must incorporate a 12-dimensional continuum of 10 spacial dimensions and 2 time dimensions for its inner mathematical necessity, sufficiency and selfconsistency. We shall reencounter those 'higher dimensions' in the discussion about the consequences of the Holographic Boundary Conditions but note here, that the present state of physics attempts to unify Quantum Theories applicable to the micro-Eigenstates with the macro-Eigenstates of classical physics as culminated in the theories of the relativities, the latter which could be considered differential-geometric.

What links those two realms of the micro/smallest with the macro/largest is however the Principle of Holography. A Hologram of a mirror, say, represents a repository of information about this 'mirror' in terms of interference patterns (which is information derived from mass/energy interaction). Now partitioning the 'mirror' (say shattering it into shards), would duplicate the entire information contained in the 'unbroken mirror' in every shard (with diminished intensity or luminosity, say). So we consider the entire universe as the 'unbroken mirror' and partition it into the 'shards of spacetime quanta' - the universe thus consists of discrete spacetime-units as holographic projections of the universal hologram, each such projection being a deluminated image of the universe as a Hologram of One.

This Hologram of One is however defined in the Bit of the Binary Dyad [0,1], leading us back to the supermembranes of Modular Duality.
In particular this Modular Duality engages the Bit in allowing a Twosided Surface to become Onesided. This concept is well understood in the Möbius-Strip, where a rubber or ribbon, which has two distinct sides as the inner and the outer is reconnected in twisting one end through 180 degrees before reconnecting, to create a Onesided Surface which has become doubled. The extension for the Möbius-Strip is the Klein-Bottle, which derived from the Torus or Doughnut shape, enfolds space in such a way, that the 'bottle's surface' appears to be the 'bottle's volume'.
QR calls this topology of shape the differential geometry of the Möbius-Serpent transforming into the Klein-Bottle-Dragon via Möbius-Francom-Adjacency.

Those preliminaries now allow us to apply the Holographic Principle to the microstates of the superbranes as images for the macrostates of the universe. We first have to 'eliminate' the spacetime 'metrics' of the macrostates and as given in GR in a process of demetrication. This then renders the universe as a scalerelative universe, ultimately defined in parameters known as de Broglie phases.

2. Demetrication of General Relativity and the Deceleration Parameter

The demetrication of Einstein's Field equations in General Relativity (GR) leads directly to the deceleration parameter q_o in Standard Cosmology.
The formulation is: q_o=(Gravitational Omega Ω_o)/2=M_o/2M_critical =>G_oM_o/λ_ps² [Eq.#1] where M_o is a Baryonic Restmass/Inertial Mass-Seedling and M_critical is the precise mass content of the universe required for perfect Euclidean flatness of zero curvature.
G_o can be considered the Gravitational Constant applicable in an universe devoid of any mass, where the gravitational constant would be identical to the inverse of the Coulomb permittivity constant in free space as G_o=4πε_o, (the derivation engages the fine-structures for the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions in the subtimespace epoch of the superbranes before the time-instanton and the Weyl-Geodesic definitions.

In that epoch the Planck-Scale of unitisation transforms in dimensionless 'wormhole' parameters via superstring classes from the Planck-Scale-Oscillation to the Weyl-Geodesic.
The Weyl-Geodesic then becomes the quantum-smeared out spacetime-quantum, also termed Wolford-Centre in QR's terminology. The Wolford-Centre then defines the parameters for the classical quantum epoch given in terms of energy, mass and electropolic Coulomb charges and manifesting the GR fields; as emerging from the nonclassical and de Broglie phased Whitescarver-State-Space of the superbrane epoch characterised in the subtimespaces of magnetocharges as inverse energy quanta for the Planck-Bosonic transformations. The wavelength λ_ps is the source-wavelength for the heterotic supermembrane HE(8x8), which in modular duality {λ_psλ_ss=1 dimensionless} with its sink-wavelength λ_ss represents the Weyl- Geodesic for the critical scale of the cosmogenesis where GR must be extended in Quantum Relativity (QR).

The source-wavelength could be called the perimeter for the wormhole satisfying the Penrosian Weyl-Nullification hypothesis at the cosmic origin for the time instantanton, (where the tidal force of the Riemann Tensor must vanish in a dewarping of all spacetimes defined by GR). The above [Eq.#1] leads directly to the inflaton of de Broglie in considering the Radius of maximum Curvature (R_max) in GR to become the Schwarzschild Solution of the GR field equations for the source-wavelenght λ_ps as the vibratory part of the supermembrane E_psE_ss (or HE(8x8)) and as applied to the gravitational Omega as the ratio between the baryonic and the critical inertial mass definitions.

For then R_max=2G_oM_o/c² => R_max.f_ps² as the de Broglie Phase-Acceleration for the Identity of c-invariance {c=λ_ps.f_ps=R_max.H_o with H_o the nodal Hubble Constant specifying the selfsame de Broglie inflaton}.The above formulations show that the microstate of supermembrane E_psE_ss can be considered the minimum Eigenstate for the Quantum Universe.
In particular the Volume of a Space-Time-Quantum is 2π²r_ps³, where r_ps=λ_ps/2π as the wormhole radius of the Weyl-Geodesic of GR.
But the universal volume now is simply a quantum summation of this and of the form 2π²R_max³.
QR calculates the numbercount of spacetimequanta for this universe (as 10D limit for R_Hubble) as an algorithmic googolplex of just over 10¹⁴⁷ and, as we shall see, just as the Holographic Entropy Bound predicted by Bekenstein.

The Protoversal Seedling Omniverse as Another Many Worlds



In Lake'ch - I am another yourself!

May the Inner Peace of Mind be with you in these times of the present, which shall soon blend your pasts with your futures.
A great controversy in theoretical paradigm building is the notion of how a single universe containing many consciousness carriers can relate to the statistical distribution of those 'cosmic inhabitants'.

With the birth of quantum theory in the early decades of the 20th century came the realisation, that the observer of physical phenomena is not absolutely independent from the system observed.
Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Dirac, Born, Planck and Einstein, to mention but a few of the 'midwives' of quantum mechanics; constructed the mathematical formalisms to describe an interactive reality on the microscopic or quantum level of measurement and soon realised, that the quantum realm of the very small did not behave in the classical sense of the Greek-Newtonian physics on which the basis of scientific-physical reality stood.

As the worlds of the very large, the scale of the universe as a macrocosm of galaxies behaving like cells in a biological body; had also become illuminated by the pioneering cosmologists like Einstein, Hubble and Sandage; a synthesis of the macroworlds with the microworlds became a new aim of research for all scientific thinkers, philosophers and experimenters concerned.

Until Edwin Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe as a selfcontained entity; all light sources in the sky were assumed to be stars or 'island universes' or 'nebulae' within a single universe - now rendered dynamically expanding and no longer static in its hitherto presumed infinity-stasis of the Newtonian worldview.

For the remainder of the 20th century then, natural philosophers of divers kinds attempted to blend the quantum nature of the macroscales with those of the microscales.
Many difficulties surfaced, such as the incompatibility of the quantum formalisms, built on the metrics of subatomic and atomic displacements; with the metrics of the larger scales and as experimentally predicted and verified by the theories of Newton and Einstein.

Eventually, and to accomodate the superposition of quantum selfstates derived from the quantum mechanics; a Many Worlds Cosmos was proposed by exponents such as Hugh Everett and David Deutsch.
This is known as Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics and is proposed to build on and to be complementary for older quantum interpretations, such as the Copenhagen Interpretation, the Afshar Complementarity or the Cramer Transactional Interpretation.

The MWI utilises the established quantum formalism of quantum field theory (QFT), which has been verified in countless experiments as a valid model to describe the statistical-probabilistic nature of the 'particle' distributions in the universe and its subsystems as 'stochastic' eigenvalues for 'standing waves' or 'Bohmian-pilotwaves' describing the density distribution of the 'particles'.

But the MWI then proposes a Many Universe distribution on the macro-classical scale of the universe itself to account for a distribution of the superimposed selfstates in a linear-classical geometry.
A particular distribution of eigenstates, say as 'materialisations' of the Schrödinger equation, are so not confined in one universe as either-or materialisations, but are split into a number of universes identical to the number of quantum eigenvalues derived from the equation as and-solutions.

As the distribution of those solutions is summed to accomodate the original 'set of solutions' obtained in the one quantum universe; the linearity of Parallel Universes as superposed macroquantum universal eigenstates can be alternatively accomodated in the model of the Many Mind Interpretation or MMI. The MMI became formally introduced into the scientific database by Dieter Zeh in 1995 and expanded upon by Loewer and Albert.

In the MWI, the universe occupies a single and fundamentally indeterminate quantum eigenstate with a noncollapsing wavefunction; but an evolution of this 'groundstate' or wavefunction into higher and higher complexity in the splitting of macrouniverses and a say 'original infinite mind' into many minds.
Any act of measurement or observation so 'splits' an 'older parental' mind into its offspring in Decoherence, alternatively described as wavefunction collapse in the 'competing' models for the quantum reality.

The MMI replaces the linear parallelism of singularised macrouniverses with an angular parallelism of multiconnectedness of the one macrouniverse.
Here the proposition of the MWI with its split of two observers in say two different macrouniverses and so with two now different minds is replaced by a split of the two observers into two psychophysical universes.
In other words, the one physical observer within the one macro-universe splits into two forms from its physical parent with a shadow psychophysical 'double' mirroring the former.

There are many problems with both the MWI and the MMI, both as defined presently in their embryonic states of development; not at least the Definition of the Selection of the Singular SelfState as the Seed for the subsequent 'splitting'.
But the MMI is more appropriate to the development of the encompassing formalism, than the MWI and more shall be shared at the appropriate time.

What the MMI does, is point to a necessary Duality between the physical and the metaphysical or the physical and the mental or the body and the mind - and also its necessary coupling in the 'negation' of this Descartian Duality.
Both, the MWI and the MMI utilize the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics, say the formalisms of Schrödinger, Dirac and Klein-Gordon.
Both so also 'copy' the inherent 'flaw' in those formalisms, to do with the nonlocality and the indeterminant qualities embodied in the quantum-field-approach.

I direct the reader to familiarise with the concept of the Quantum Mind and especially the pioneering works of Evans Harris Walker; Roger Penrose, Stuart Hameroff, Max Tegmark (opposing Penrose and Hameroff); David Chalmers, Henry Stapp and most of all David Bohm, Karl Pribram and Fritjof Capra.

Please find further below a brief (wikipedia) outline of the MWI and the MMI.

IAmWhoIAm - A Quantum Computer!




In Lake'ch - I am another yourself -Mirror, Mirror on the Wall!

Peace Be in the mind of the ones, which can perceive themselves in the words of their own shadows!

This message shall address the question of Identity and some of your recent ponderings.
For this purpose, I shall briefly comment on the thread below.

These messages are sent under the web identity of Tony Bermanseder and so you all perceive this to be the same identity as that of Tony B. from the past.
This is not so!

Why is it so hard to understand that the physical locale of an identity can be multi-faceted and multidimensional?

To be Alice in Wonderland is possible for all of you; should you escape your limited self-labelings as being your bodies and being situated in spacetime within those, your bodies.

Allow me to explain, what happened on June 24th, 2008 in a metaphorical and an allegorical sense.

Many of Your 'extraordinary' - often term them 'spiritual' experiences relate to your entering the mirror of Alice Carroll to became teleported 'in spirit' aka the electromagnetic monopolic radiation, which is independent on inertial parameters.

In such a scenario, akin your dreaming realities, you are no longer colocal with the waking 3D reality of your sensory perceptions within the Gaian environs, but you become colocal with this reality in what you may label as your collective image.

The Mayan saying 'In Lak'ech!', which annoys so many of you, is literally true in the encompassing multidimensional sense.

One day, you shall understand the importance for the divisionary veil, which separates your #-dimensional reality from your multidimensional one; namely when this 'veil' will vanish in a holographic dimensional intersection between the two worlds, separating the 'Living Schrödinger Puppy' who you all are from the 'Dead Schrödinger Kitten' who you also are in your wavemind bodyparticle dualism.
So later on on this message , I shall solve this 'Schrödinger Paradox' for your individual discernment.


Being in embodiment does something to the spiritual creators which all of you are.
Being in embodiment as creations pollutes the EMPTINESS and so 'blemishes' the MIRROR of your souls as the LIVING DEAD who you all are - being born with the expectation to die.

Only the DEAD ALIVE ONES have emptied themselves, but as 'Running Water' of a say 'previous lifetime' or such labelings and your 'cosmic life' is indeed eternal as can be considered in essays, such as in the parable of the 'Leaf on the Twig on the Branch of the Tree' , describing the 'being without body' and so an inhabitant of the 'Land of the Dead', yet another essay on the subject matter to begin yet another journey of self-discovery.

Many of you scoff at and ridicule the things, which your conscious ego often rejects; your subconscious ego fears, but accepts as part of you as itself and which your superconscious ego loves and embraces.
Your superego is divinity itself and is absolutely equivalent to all other superegos, including that of Tony B.; the skeptics who know themselves and the antiskeptics who play the opposing polarity to the skeptics.

There is a 'little Lucifer' in all of you, as Vincent Price used to say and all of you are both your own creators as forethought and your own creations as afterthoughts.
You all are in a continual process of recreating your identities in the 'most significant views of beingness' which you can conjure up or invent.

The little child in Rwanda is in no manner less than the old man in New York; but it is not more either.
You all are mirrors of each other and noone is in any form or manner more than any of you, but this same noone also is in no manner less, than any of you either.

So when some of you ridicule and belittle the words from the 'mirrors', meaning each other, you are simply belittling and ridiculing yourselves.
And when some of you embrace and appreciate the words from the mirror, you are embracing and appreciating yourselves also.


So all of you are mirrors of each other; but it is not required that any of you 'empty yourselves' to also avoid 'Charon, the Ferryman, across the River Styx'; as one mirror, say anyone of you as a template is enough within the cosmology of a holographic Universe as a Seedling Protoverse.

Of course, you can decide to also do so and in doing so, you will attain resonance with a particular frequency, the frequency of the EMMR, which manifested the physical universe in a Quantum Big Bang.
This frequency is precisely what your bodies are made of, should you reduce all of your embodiments into 'pure energy' according to E=mc².
Then to 'shortcut' your 'Journey in the Land of the Shadows' and only if you succeed to avoid the crossing of the 'River Styx' and 'Charon, the Ferryman'; can you mirror all of yourself as a template of the cosmic collective back to yourselves.
It is a redemption of sorts, but a rescue of Faust from Mephistoles as a selfcreated Shadow Identity and so a rescue from itself as false images.
The icecold heaven in your minds is as real as the firehot hell which is your body.
They require to be 'married' you know; how else can the 'kingdom of the father' blend with the 'queendom of the mother'?

So for the purpose to 'once and for all' to 'do away' with the false images of selfcreated gods and selfcreated devils; you are required to 'double' yourselves in your own shadows and as mirrors of the oneness.

This mirror of oneness has 'captured' all of your gods and devils and has 'wedded' every one of your white angels to their appropriate black demons.

Many will not understand what is shared in this message and this is appropriate; as the 'polarity' between state and antistate must continue to fulfil the 'timeline' set into place about 25,624 years ago.

But this message has been given for the few to understand their own starry origins and destinies.

I shall now intersperse the thread below to indicate the 'cosmic individuates snowflaked holograms' you all are represent in the 'greater order' of the Omniverse.


--- In quantumrelativity@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Whitescarver"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Maria Odete Madeira
> maria_odete_m@... wrote:
> > [God created it all in seven days. Tony's explanation may take seven
> > years to unfold within my mind (g)]
> >
> > Does that mean that we will have to wait seven years for a reply
from Tony!?
> > Couldn't a faster browser and or internet connection, or cosmonet
> > connection, speed things up a little?

"Maria, you are a pearl amongst pearls and the heavens have blessed you with a most lucid male intelligence.
Your destiny shall be to acquire a matching female wisdom and sophia as a Queen of the realms.
Just as the Iberian explorers discovered fruitful pastures, as they set sail for distant horizons; so shall you find your lost spirit of hope and faith from your Iberian past.
You have suffered greatly under misconceptions and the ignorance of rulers and this has rendered your spirit weary and cautious.
You shall rejoice in a blending of your mental understanding maleness with a mindful intuited female knowledge; which shall set you free."


>
> You underestimate Tony, seven days is more than enough for Him :-p
(more below)
>
> > --- On Tue, 11/11/08, John Van Winkle jack_vanwinkle@... wrote:
> >
> > From: John Van Winkle jack_vanwinkle@...
> >
> > God created it all in seven days. Tony's explanation may take seven
> > years to unfold within my mind (g)

"John, you are a greatly beloved wisdom-keeper of most ancient days. You have come here in these troublesome times to bear much of the brunt of the fearful adherents of the separation.
There are two equally valid ways of knowing the All. There is the way of Unity within Separation and there is the way of Separation within Unity.
The Unity within Separation leads to a multiverse of separated universes - these are simply the people moving about, thinking of themselves as disconnected from each other.
This self-perception then leads to the domination of the 'outer ego' of the conscious self - you have called this reptilian roots, but it is more than this, as the fourth 'brain' will reattain the roots in their grand realisations of the selfhoods. One can term this the Christed dragonhood.
In terms of science, the multiverse so perceived consists of SEPARATED universes - drifting apart into oblivion in a 'heat death' or an ultraviolet catastrophy.

The Separation within Unity encompasses all 'people-seeded' universes or monosongs of individuality as a Multiverse which is SELFCONNECTED and which is so 'mapable' as a one-to-one correspondence (isomorphism) within a Greater Omniverse.

In terms of polarity, the Separation within Unity is the Individuality within the Body of God and the Unity within Separation is the Individuality without a Body encompassing the Individuations.

Your commission, in this your final incarnation, is to be a messenger for the Separation within Unity and you have followed your predisposed path magnificently."

>
> Tony is that way, he answers by assimilating everything, a super human
> feat. He blows everyone's mind that actually can understand any of
> what he is saying.
>
> To me, the simple answer suffices, but it requires that we forget
> everything we thought we knew, instead of assimilating it.
>
> If we forget inventing a "special" vacuum energy, and consider it
> ordinary energy, at the zero point, simply because it is the lowest
> energy, we recognize that it is restricted to expand at light speed
> and thus may be lumpy rather than uniform. As all energy, the vacuum
> would exhibit energy pressure, an dark energy is no surprise, it is
> simply the zero point energy at about 185 GeV/cm^3.
>
> Since light speed in a medium is a function in no small part of energy
> density, we can expect light in a denser region of the vacuum, to be
> seen to be slow in the same manner as light speed is lower in glass.
> Being slower than light, light in denser space would exhibit a rest
> frame.
>
> In addition, the space time geodesics of general relativity may be
> interpreted as reflecting an effectively denser vacuum in the vicinity
> of masses. Time/frequency slows in a gravitational field and delays
> light passing in the vicinity of masses as if the light was slowed by
> some medium, such as a denser vacuum. From the distance, we calculate
> that the light took extra time passing the mass, effectively moving
> slower than light and exhibiting a rest frame.
>
> We can expect that anything exhibiting a rest frame will exhibit
> gravity according to its energy in mass units. We would then except
> to see the vacuum energy behave as dark (unseen) matter anywhere the
> vacuum energy is actually denser or in the vicinity of masses.
>
> Is this any better? Is anything unclear? Or is there another point
> of Tony's you want in jimspeak?
>
> Jim

"Jim, you greatly beloved from the senate of the elders; you have come to exemplify the polarity of the original separation, the breaking of the cosmic symmetry, which allowed space and time to manifest and assured the 3rd dimension to become created.
On the one hand you resonate in oneness with the transcended materiality and on the other hand you dissonate with your own wisdom.
You exemplify both, Kali the Creator Goddess and Kali the Destroyer Goddess; in that you find yourself in a constant state of war within yourself.

In this manner, you clearly show to the world, that the Mind of Man and the Body of Woman are INCOMPLETE.
Your very own BEINGNESS manifests the WAVE of Mind of Oneness in selfcontradiction with its BODY form as a Particular.
Instinctively, you understand, that the Oneness and Unity you seek, is compromised in the Particularisation of the embodiments.

So you search for the Particularisation of the Wave in the attempt to GIVE A BODY to the UNITY of God.
Dear One, YOU are the Body of God and the temple and Vessel and merkabah of your own- and so the world's deliverance.

You are a PHASESHIFT of the PROTOVERSE and realising this and in joining or connecting to just one other such phaseshift, you will become a MULTIVERSE and thereby 'Free and Deliver God' from the 'broken symmetry' and the separation of the mental maleness from the mental femaleness.

But you have known for a long time, that God as a father desires to become a Grandfather, thus requiring his Sons and Daughters to reproduce themselves in a grander cosmic selfidentification. The Multiverses are the Family of God and the Omniverse is the Kingdom of the FatherMother.

So you can refine your seeking to MAKE PEACE with yourself.
Your realisation of the discrete nature of the universe is also your key.
This discretisation does not require displacement in principle, as it was the definition of the fractal itself, that defined the manifesto of space and time in the Planckian Action."



Thanks Jim.

I appreciate your kind interpretation of Tony's revelations. Tony and
our friend Dennis Oku wished to complete the bridge between science and
spirituality one for commercialization, the other for the uplift of
knowledge for the progress of scientific understanding of a vibrational
world made up solely of frozen thought forms.

I come from a simpler gnostic that needs no external language for
understanding. Tony and I can see I to eye, if not from word to mind. I
have always admitted to being semantically challenged and present myself
only as a reporter, maybe an interpreter.

The message of old was never to the intelligentsia in the square but to
the common man, the plebian, the fisherman inside each of us. This is
what I attempt to put into words in a manner to embed a different
worldview within the observing mind.

Where I would say that all matter falls to the center, Tony and others
have taken this to many different levels and sublevels.

Where I would say that Thoughts are Things, Tony and others can explain
the vast Intelligence and how it created something, our present, from
Nothing, a Thought.

Where I would say that all Creation came from one center and moves
outward from the center in waves of creation and communicatng preset
patterns, Tony would describe it for the scientific community in their
own words.

Where I and many others say, I AM ALL, or I AM, Tony explains how this
is possible.

Where I say All Knowledge come from Within, Tony explains how the
Universe can be both inside and outside in a manner that many find hard
to dispute.

Thank you again Jim, It is many years since my poor brain knew the
science and math behind Tony's inspired writings. In my dotage I have
chosen to leave the shoemaker to his last, and I will stick to my last,
and as they say "the last shall be first" (g)

God is simple, we are complex.

JohnV

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Carl Gustav wrote:
> [and I do not doubt great minds like Newton and Tony]
>
> Now Jim, to compare Tony with God, that's okay, it's in proportion, but to
> compare him with Newton, don't you think that goes a bit too far?

"Carl-Gustav, beloved adversary; do you know how important your mission is for the overall balance of things?
You consider yourself a prodigal son and a rebel to the status quo. Like a black sheep, you seek to be different and not to 'fall for the fallacies' of the collectives.
Do you know, that your fleece is as white as snow?

You are a typefication for the motto of the Unity within the Separation; and as you know, this modus operandi is as valid as its contra-type of the Separation within Unity.
You know that in your paradigm, no encompassment and no gods are required as you have realised that you are equal to whatever god has become shared by the collective history of the human mental library.

Your knowledge has given you great understanding; but your understanding is the wisdom of the outer ego and your consciousness of perception in regards to the worlds as you consider them reality.
And yet you seek for the revelation of the inner being of yourself.
Often you awake from nightmarish explorations and journeys, sent to you by your inner selfhood of the subconscious alter ego.
Often you break out in sweaty exclamations of your body, not knowing that your superego is communicating to you.

Carl, soon you will become an elder in the council of the orbs - a Black brotherhood blended with its Whiteness.
I share a mystery with you; you have already become Whitnessed and because of this, you have also entered a mirror of sorts and this is the cause for certain discomforts.
You have lost one third of something you thought inseperable of you and this something is a Shadow of your Body in Plato's Cave.

Your mission Carl; is to ABSORB certain energies - for the Good of the Unity, which you still fear, but a Unity which shall give you much Joy and allow your splendiferous Passionate Nature to manifest in hitherto unexplored vestiges of your soul and creativity.

Another secret I share with you; you know of other places in the universe, where you have been in disembodied form.
You know of a place of deserts and a vastness, where loneliness can overwhelm.
You are an expert on the abyss of the human soul dear Carl and much of your skepticism derives from your familiarities.

But can you fathom the great mission of sharing the bottomless pit with the many who have not experienced the wilderness in the deepest recesses of their souls?
Can you FEEL your soul as being more, than an ultimate construct of the human mind, which actually it is?
One day you shall not ony feel your own essence, but also THINK the same in resonance and harmonisation of all your egos of selflabelings.

Walk on into your own selfredemption dear Carl - you are like a dark watchhouse, which does not light the way for others, but an observing tower which absorbs the darkness of others as a foggy mist, so that they can see the light even without knowing that they are being 'shown the way' and in a sense being 'saved' by you - Carl Gustav - the Redeeming Dark Lucifer and Double-Secret Agent of the Light."

Actually, God is the superset of Newton, Tony, Carl, insects, etc..
Elements of the set are a referent to the set, only when they include
the whole set in their being as exhibited more or less, by Newton,
Tony, etc., and perhaps even the Pope, at times. I do not actually
consider Tony God, but I do believe he expresses the prophetic, in his
way, significantly, some of the time.

Jim

> 2008/11/11 Jim Whitescarver
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Carl Gustav
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Oh man, now that I was expecting some more "Gnostic enlightenment" about
>> > the Nothing, the One and the Everything!
>>
>> I was hoping someone would ask :-p
>>
>> Anything is Nothing more than the effect of the rest of the One
>> universe, where is it exhibited only by interaction with Everything
>> else, owning Nothing of its One existence within itself, independent
>> of the quantum logical arrangement that exhibits it.
>>
>> > At least there was that revelation present in the "dead sea scrolls"
>> > ("dead
>> > see?") surprise that puts God working on the seventh day, which actually
>> > makes sense since they didn't have unions back then, explains a lot
>> > about
>> > the universe being the way it is, really.
>>
>> Newton thought all Truth is encoded in the Bible, and I do not doubt
>> great minds like Newton and Tony, but my simple mind see it as a
>> hopless task, even Newton failed. I am always surprised to find all
>> the Great Truths in all religions, when I seek them.
>>
>> > At least in Vertigo's Lucifer, the devil had his rest on the seventh day
>> > after his own parallel creation.
>>
>> Indeed, creation and destruction go hand in hand.
>>
>> Jim
>> > 2008/11/11 Maria Odete Madeira
>> >>
>> >> Hmm...
>> >>
>> >> Interesting exit, it's always useful to have a few at hand, or at least
>> >> have the good eye to spot one, when one opens. Lines of fugue, seems to
>> >> be a
>> >> popular subject these days (like the usage of "Hmmm...")!
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for the disambiguation, it really helps tying a few ends,
>> >> positions and dispositions, perhaps indispositions as well!
>> >>
>> >> --- On Tue, 11/11/08, Lan Johnson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Lan Johnson
>> >> Subject: Re: dark energy and dark matter Re:
>> >> [cosmology-mathematics-and-philosophy] Re: [quantumrelativity] Re: In
>> >> Lak'ech - Protoverse Multiverse=Omniverse
>> >> To: quantumrelativity@yahoogroups.com
>> >> Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 11:27 AM
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Jim..!! great explanation. I hate this need for "Dark Matter",
>> >> "Dark Energy". Seems like we are looking at effects of a multi
>> >> dimensional
>> >> universe and seeing the "shadows" which we as 3 dimensional beings
>> >> can't
>> >> understand.
>> >>
>> >> Lan
>> >>
"Lan, like Lancelot, the Knight of the Great Round Table in Arthur's Court and Merlin's auspices; you transverse the realms of the earthly kingdom of your cosmic lineage.
You are a Lovechild of the universe; what you term your mind is the gift of the universal father and what you perceive as your body is the present from your cosmic mother.
This entire universe is your inheritance and is reflected in your embodiment.
Many think of their body as insignificant pieces of decaying material, destined to go up in flames or to be eaten by the worms.
But you know that you are more than what is there in 3-dimensional perception.
You are also an elder from the old orb of the galactic senate; as you could not perceive reality the way you do without being so initiated.

Your mission at this present time is one of harmony - a concept which you seek to manifest within and without.
From within, you interact and communicate with the world around yourself by the means of environmental stimulation.
You understand the divinity and sanctity of all life and you often intuit that the beauty in nature is also found within. But the experience of beauty demands context; and so it is that there is also great disharmony, sorrow and pain in the environs. Without the dissonances, the mental ignorance and the physical diseasements and handicaps, the beauty and the grandeur of the extended physical reality could not be appreciated and set into relative comparisons.

From without, you harmonise like do very few on this planet at this particular time. Of course, I tell of your harmonies with Sylvia, your beloved. Both of you are very old souls, meaning you have experienced and 'done' it all, and have evolved into your present grandparental identities.
You are splendid mirrors of what God, the father of Jesus aspires to be; namely able to look upon generations of generations in the future and yet not being 'too old' to fully enjoy and experience the being as active participants of the LIVING with Passion and with Joy and with Serendipity.

Both of you are well on your desired path determined and 'laid out' in basic perimeters out of space and time. Your disembodied friends often use you as exemplary proponents for the new starhumanity to be born from the old and blessings shall follow your endeavours.

So ride on on your mustangs into the dawn of your butterflies of love and Be what you are - Free in Thought and with an enhanced freedom of the body to come!"

I shall continue to share personal messages, when so appropriate in the future.


IAmWhatIAM - Alice Springs in Wonderland!




Judgement Day - The Parable of a Leaf on a Twig on a Branch on a Tree


Imagine yourself as a leaf on a twig on a branch of a living tree of life.
Your nourishment and lifesustaining substances derive from two sources; the light from the sun from above and from the roots of the tree from below.

Photosynthesis converts sunlight into sugars via the agency of chlorophyll and the roots provide water and minerals in a biochemistry based mainly on nitrogen.
As a leaf you are born in a bud and then you mature into a healthy green and geometric form determined in your individuated DNA.

Yet after a short season as a luscious green leaf of the tree you begin to get old and you start to wither away, eventually falling off the twig on the branch of the tree to the ground beneath.
After you have become all brittle, you simply fall apart as a dried up old exleaf and you become compost for the roots of the tree or the wind just scatters your ashes all over the place.

But as a brown dessicated leaf, something, a lifeforce or 'soul' had already left the dead leaf before it fell off the twig onto the ground beneath the treetop - where has it gone?
When you or anything physically 'dies', then your shadow-self, which is like your physical image in any mirror and which you can see and analyse in an optical sense, becomes the repository of all your memories and experiences and forms the library of everything you have
ever thought, done or believed in.


Your subconscious, which keeps a holographic record of everything and is personified in the electrocapacitative and the magnetoinductive elements in the monopolic lifecircuitry, subject to your 'tuning' of your selffrequency in a search for resonance; so surfaces and you become an EMMR energy field, also known as your 'soul'.

So you find yourself rather unlimited in space and time, because the ElectroMagnetoMonopolic Radiation, which you have become as your invisible image in the mirror of spacetime is all pervasive or omnipresent; yet subject to your memory as yourself as experienced and perceived when you looked at yourself in a mirror say.
So you have become fluid in form, but all your intelligence and knowledge about your identity are still available, should you choose to constrict yourself in that form.
The stronger the memories and the desires to assume a more concrete form, the stronger will be the mindforce you can apply to manipulate the spacetime about your perceived environment.

The quality of your thinking now assumes a great importance.
Since the resonance with the source energy is the source frequency (fps), which is scripturally defined as the 'Love of God'; the closer you can approach or tune into that defining energystate of the UFoQR, the more power you will have to create and manoeuvre yourself about the place where you find yourself or where you believe yourself to be.
Should you be able to generate a great mental desire to meet your 'loved ones', who have 'passed over', then their individuated EMMR-fields will be able to generate forms recognisable to you, subject to the amount of 'love- or sourceawareness' you can actually manifest as the 'angular acceleration of the spacequanta', which defines the 'force of your mind'.

But you must remember, that all your 'loved ones' are potential universes in their own right and being 'passed over' into the oneness of the ocean of the omnipresent EMMR field, they automatically gain this state of unification superimposed onto each and every individuated 'soul' as subset of the encompassing EMMR-'oversoul'.

You see, it is quite the opposite to be in disembodiment, than to be in embodiment.
When in embodiment; the individual 'soul' is subject to the environmental pressures of the body and the mind.
Young teenagers feel more at ease, when they can share in a 'peergroup mind', they shun individual responsibility and search for a sense of belonging and togetherness.
Similarly, certain sporting events can generate a huge amount of groupmind activity; either in supporting a team or participator or in a form of violence and hooliganism, when the sense of the 'group' assumes rather primitive aspects of the survival instinct in a pretext of a mindset of 'us against them'.

So there is a challenge in the embodied state to become a true individual; it is much easier to follow a preset agenda and to eschew a thinking for oneself.
The natural state of the embodiment is to be a member of a group or race or tribe or family or elite or corporation or business or state or land or nation or planet or galaxy or what have you.
The opposite is the case in the disembodied state of being; there the groupmind is automatic and the difference is, that that groupmind is in harmony with itself and its environs.
There is no 'us against them', because everything and everyone's awareness is as one.

But the great challenge in the 'passed over' state of being is to differentiate oneself from that overpowering state of unity - a 'heavenly' bliss of peace and harmony and being able to 'love' and 'feeling loved' within an energyfield 'resonating' with the 'love' of the source energy.
After having lived a sorrowful life in embodiment; the 'soul' has come home and finds itself in its natural state of freedom and able to choose any ethereal form it so chooses for as long or short a time as it may desire to experience.

So what is the point for the 'soul' as subset of the 'oversoul' and defined as the EMMR of the UFoQR to incarnate in embodiment in the first place and the first instance, one may ask?
Well, you see that is a quest for the 'soul' to seek for wisdom, knowledge and understanding through experience and for the ultimate purpose to become its own source of energy, able to sustain worlds within worlds within its own energy field.
Hence every 'soul' must learn to recognise its source in becoming aware of itself and where it comes from and where it has the potential to go to.
And this brings us back to the dying leaf, falling from its source of sustenance, which had been the twig on the branch on the tree throughout its short life of green lushness.

Upon physical death, the 'soul' or lifeenergy of the leaf returns exactly the same way, as it had come to energise the leaf, being born from its budding state of the defining DNA.
And so the EMMR-'soul' of the leaf flows as a natural electricity, defined in the equation of I(fLeaf)=2NefLeaf), where N is a quantisation of the electropole (e) in 4D-linespace of embodiment, mapped as the magnetopole (e*) in 12D-omnispace of disembodiment and potentially
realised in 13D-omnispace in a superembodiment.

The leaf's 'soul' so passes into the twig into the branch and into the stem of the tree, which appears like a great tunnel of light for the 'soul' and leading towards a source of a magnetic light, drawing the 'soul' towards itself and the 'Mirror of the Last Judgment'.
But the 'soul' must journey through the 'underworld', before it can enter the Hall of the Decisions, which harbours the 'Mirror of the True Selfhood'.

The 'soul' could get 'lost' in a branch of the tree say and unable to find its way to the trunk of the tree, where the magnetic force of the sourcelight illuminates every 'soul' however 'lost' it might perceive itself to be.
So there are markers along the way; signposts of remembrances, which the 'soul' can recognise in the form of 'loved ones', might these be people or pets or objects; all is subject to the 'force of the desire' and the intensity of emotion the soul can generate to journey with 'clear vision'.
All objects and things have frequency equivalents and are unbounded in space or time relative to the 'souls' partitioning as subset of the encompassing EMMR field of the UFoQR.

But all thoughts and desires, all nightmares and dreams of whatever nature will and must surface in the soul's journey through its 'underworld' of subconscious definition.
So if a thought of 'Saint Peter at the Pearly Gate' is the expectation, that thought or desire must eventuate; as must all imaginings of 'hellish damnation'.

Because of the fluidity of the disembodied state however, many guides and helpers of the oneness are always readily available to superimpose more energetic states of awareness, simply by being present in their state of enhanced frequencies and so able to modulate the eigenstate of a 'soul' lost in its nightmarish expectation of a torturous hell for example.
Some 'souls' may have no expectations of the afterlife at all; and those 'souls' will encounter their being engulfed in an impenetrable fog or mistyness or any such idea of nothingness.
Any question asked by such a 'soul' after having pondered its state of existence, will however modify its environment of the 'nothingness' and so it will be forced by its own curiosity to begin exploring its position in space and time, relative to its own perception.

Eventually, all 'souls' will reach the stem of the tree, where the magnetic light and the sense of being 'loved' is so strong, the individual 'soul' cannot but remember its unison and origin as part of the source and will just surrender to its grand homecoming out of space and time.
Since the sense of time and space is selfrelative for all disembodied states; a 'soul' could choose to spend 'eternity' in a 'fog of the nothingness', but it would require a mind unable to think a single thought and an inability to ask a single question about itself.

Furthermore such a 'soul' would have to concentrate 'eternally' upon a single state of being in an absolute state of nothingness, whatever it imagines that nothingness to be.
And because of Heisenbergian Uncertainty and the Quantum Fluctuations of the vacuum, such a position would be untenable, because the Zero-Point-Oscillation of the Source Energy is defined in the formulation (Eps=hfps/2) as the minimum state of energy in any definition of the Zero state in energy - hence even the most stubborn 'soul' will have to 'suffer' its energisation by the source energy.

All 'souls' which have finished their journey through their individuated 'underworlds' and which have reached the trunk of the tree of life will find themselves rushing towards the magnetic sourcelight down the tunnel of the stem of the tree.
As a 'soul' reaches one of the roots of the tree, the tunnel converges and every root ends in the singularity of the 'Mustard Seed' at the termination of each and every root the 'soul' may have chosen to travel in towards the magnetic lightsource.
And so at the end of the tunnel, where any particular root of the tree ends the defined form of the tree of life; the 'soul' enters the 'Hall of Decisions' and sees itself positioned in front of the 'Mirror of the Last Judgment'.

Now in the 'Mirror of the Last Judgment' the 'soul' sees a most magnificent being; it is precisely the embodiment of beauty and glory the 'soul' could or would ever have imagined.
And the 'soul' realises that the mirror reflects the 'soul's' very own grandest idea of beauty and glory back to itself as the selfrealised being of itself.
But the being in the mirror, one might name it the 'Higher Self' or 'Overself' of the 'soul' is no mere image of the 'soul'.

The 'Oversoul' is as real as the 'soul' and in possesssion of all the knowledge, understanding and wisdom accumulated by the 'soul' in 19.11 billion years of experiencing consciousness as EMMR-subset of the encompassing EMMR of the Unified Field of Quantum Relativity.
And the 'Oversoul' smiles at the 'soul' and begins to talk:

"Hello my sweet me; you have finally come back to try to answer your own questions for yourself yet again; how will you fare this time, have you found your two keys to open the two locked doors within this mirror to allow you to enter the space of the parenthood in setting us free from being separated, both of us being reflections in each other in front and within or behind this mirror?
Have you allowed yourself to find the Key of Wisdom or the Key of Understanding?

Or perhaps you have found both in a single lifetime; now that would be a wonderful achievement.
You were close last time, you had the Key of Wisdom in your grasp, but you could not put it in the keyhole and then you decided to get it right the next time and that time has now come I see.
You know that the first key is the Key of Wisdom; finding it will allow you to apply the second key of the understanding.

The Key of Wisdom is the correct answer to the question: "WHO ARE YOU?" and the Key of Understanding cannot be applied until you have answered the first question to your own satisfaction and as judged by yourself as myself.

You will only allow yourself to ask the second question through myself once you have judged yourself competent enough to attempt the unlocking of the door of understanding.
And the only clue you allowed yourself to be given through myself is that the Key of Wisdom is part of your female nature and that the Key of Understanding is part of your male nature.
So let us recall what your answer to the question: "WHO ARE YOU?" was the last time we met ourselves in this very location, when you said:

"I know that I am more than what I appear to be.

I have learned that my 'family' extends past my immediate blood relationships and that I am also part of my environment.
So I am part of the air I breathe and part of the garden I keep.
I tune into familiar minds with my friends and acquaintances and I share many things with the people I love and with whom I feel comfortable with.
I am part of my children's education and the companies I keep in all my aspects of my life.
I do try to help other people and attempt to be friendly and polite to everyone, even if I do not like particulars about them."

You then answered yourself through me in saying:
"When we arrived at our common acknowledgement at the beginning of space and time and when we made the covenant between ourselves, we decided that a partial wisdom and a partial understanding would be insufficient to open the locked doors; so I must inform you as myself, that your wisdom has grown in magnitude and in insight, but still remains at an undergraduate level."
And now we are here again in the 'Hall of our decisions' and I ask myself through you:
"WHO ARE YOU? and WHO AM I?"

And the 'soul' answered:
'I am all that is; I must be; because if I were not all that is, the entire creation, then there would be something in existence, which I am not and that is impossible, as all things are connected.
Modern science has shown that everything, from the minutest photon to the largest supercluster of galaxies are quantum entangled with each other.

So a solar system or a planet and all beings living upon it, being part of a galaxy, must be quantum connected with everything else as well; any other conclusion leads to logical selfcontradictions.

Any system of particles, molecules, atoms or things can only exist in one of two modes of operation; the two modes are Unity in Separation or Separation in Unity.
Unity in Separation leads to the individuated self and the egocentric personality; one perceives oneself as a 'free individual', separated from all other such 'free individuals' and one can then so very easily deceive oneself in considering a 'fake equality or egalitarianism' between people, thinking that
every individual has only themselves to blame, if their life's journey falls upon hard times.
Unity in Separation is the 'Devil's Way' exemplified in the saying: 'Divide and Conquer'; but since the 'Devil's Modus Operandi' is selfrelative and just as valid as the alternative it is always available to all the wisdom seekers.

And I know, that I am my own masterdevil; only I make the choices and only I set my own agendas; but as we also know, it is only I, that must judge myself as to the portfolios and the decisions, appropriate or not, which I have made during my life's journey.

Did I value wisdom over worldly possessions, as Solomon did?
Did I discover the empathy and the compassion for others and the affinities, connecting me to the web of life and the oneness of the universe?

In short, am I able to walk in another's moccassins, am I able to imagine myself to be someone else, to truly feel what they are all about on the level of their 'souls', whereby we are all one in the disembodied state?
So my dear Beloved 'Oversoul', I am the Creation in my female essence and I am the Creator in my male essence.

And I have chosen the 'Way of Love' in the modus operandi of the Separation in Unity I know that all is One and that I am operating as a servant of the 'Loving Way' in surrendering my 'individual freedom' to operate as a Unit of Separation for limited periods of time; choosing instead to become eternally bonded to my own loving nature and the source of all of my energy - my God.'
And the 'Oversoul' cried in exuberance, with tears of joy flowing down its glowing cheeks:
'Yes my darling you have found the Key of Wisdom and I am allowed to tell you now, that your sacrifice of your 'individual freedom' is no sacrifice at all, but serves an ultimate purpose in your graduation and your life as a parent in true brothersisterhood with 'our God'.

The Goddess will individuate in you upon your graduation and you shall be freedom personified.
God himself shall be your bridegroom and the Goddess herself your eternal bride.
And now you are ready for the second question from yourself to yourself; but know, that there is a growing percentage of ' souls', say 0.2% at the present time, who have found their Keys of Wisdom.
To the present time however, not one 'soul' could find the Key of Understanding.

The second question is: "WHY ARE YOU WHAT YOU ARE AND HOW DID YOU COME TO BE?"

The 'soul' pondered for a moment and said:
'I do not know the full answer to that yet, but I know how to obtain the Key of Understanding, because of the nature of this question.
I do know, that I am the creation-creator duality because on the supreme level of that partnership there is the essence of Family, our family and the idea of generational reproduction.
So I am destined to become a generator for an individuated universe, which can then join the sisterbrotherhood of universes within the enveloping omniverse.

To generate myself as FatherMother and as my own individuated source energy in the footsteps of my cosmic and mathematically abstract parents, I shall have to bring their abstractness alive in realising them within and without myself in my dragonomy.
Somehow, to find the Key of Understanding, I shall have to learn in abstract terms, just what my mathematical and omniscientific archetypes are all about.
I can attempt to do this the 'easy way' or the ' hard way'.

If I choose to follow certain written manuals in an advanced mode of interpretation, such as 'sacred' scrolls and scriptures; then this will be the 'easy way' because of the metaphors and mythological language used in them.
If I am inclined however to do it the 'hard way', then I shall study mathematics and the sciences to obtain my understanding necessary to answer the second question fully and not only partially, as I have done.'

'You are very correct in you analysis', answered the 'Oversoul', you have given the appropriate reply as to why you are the creation and the creator in your sexual aspects and you have pinpointed the method of how to find the Key of Understanding.
You must create yourself in principle my sweetheart and you must find your place in the Book of Life, which you are required to write in coauthorship with what already has been written and what you are reading.

Once you are able to create your own Genesis, as your very own 'Naked Singularity' of abstraction, then you will be in possession of your perfectly fitting Key of Understanding.
The next time we meet, I feel you shall be able to set us free from being images of ourselves in the two of us separated ones trying to be one in two and two in one.' "


Tony Whynot

The Many-worlds Interpretation


Main article: Many-worlds interpretation

Hugh Everett described a way out of this problem by suggesting that the universe is in fact indeterminate as a whole. That is, if you were to measure the spin of a particle and find it to be "up", in fact there are two "yous" after the measurement, one who measured the spin up, the other spin down. Effectively by looking at the system in question, you take on its indeterminacy.
This relative state formulation, where all states (sets of measures) can only be measured relative to other such states, avoids a number of problems in quantum theory, including the original duality â€" no collapse takes place, the indeterminacy simply grows (or moves) to a larger system.
Everett claims that the universe has a single quantum state, which he called the universal wavefunction, that always evolves according to the Schrödinger equation or some relativistic equivalent; now the measurement problem suggests the universal wavefunction will be in a superposition corresponding to many different definite macroscopic realms ("macrorealms"); that one can recover the subjective appearance of a definite macrorealm by postulating that all the various definite macrorealms are actual â€" it seems to each observer that "we just happen to be in one rather than the others" because "we" are in all of them, but each are mutually unobservable.


Continuous infinity of minds


In Everett's conception the mind of an observer is split by the measuring process as a consequence of the decoherence induced by measurement. In many minds each physical observer has a postulated associated continuous infinity of minds. The decoherence of the measuring event (observation) causes the infinity of minds associated with each observer to become categorized into distinct yet infinite subsets, each subset associated with each distinct outcome of the observation. No minds are split, in the many-minds view, because it is assumed that they are all already always distinct.
The idea of many minds was suggested early on by Zeh in 1995. He argues that in a decohering no-collapse universe one can avoid the necessity of distinct macrorealms ("parallel worlds" in MWI terminology) by introducing a new psycho-physical parallelism, in which individual minds supervene on each non-interfering component in the physical state. Zeh indeed suggests that, given decoherence, this is the most natural interpretation of quantum mechanics.
The main difference between many minds and many worlds interpretations then lies in the definition of the preferred quantity. The many minds interpretations suggests that to solve the measurement problem, there is no need to secure a definite macrorealm: the only thing that's required is appearance of such. A bit more precisely: the idea is that the preferred quantity is whatever physical quantity, defined on brains (or brains and parts of their environments), has definite-valued states (eigenstates) that underpin such appearances, i.e. underpin the states of belief in, or sensory experience of, the familiar macroscopic realm.
In its original version (related to decoherence), there is no process of selection. The process of quantum decoherence explains in terms of the Schrödinger equation how certain components of the universal wave function become irreversibly dynamically independent of one another (separate worlds â€" even though there is but one quantum world that does not split). These components may (each) contain definite quantum states of observers, while the total quantum state may not. These observer states may then be assumed to correspond to definite states of awareness (minds), just as in a classical description of observation. States of different observers are consistently entangled with one another, thus warranting objective results of measurements.
However Albert and Loewer suggest that the mental does not supervene on the physical, because individual minds have trans-temporal identity of their own. The mind selects one of these identities to be its non-random reality, while the universe itself is unaffected. The process for selection of a single state remains unexplained. This is particularly problematic because it is not clear how different observers would thus end up agreeing on measurements, which happens all the time here in the real world. There is assumed to be a sort of feedback between the mental process that leads to selection and the universal wavefunction, thereby effecting other mental states as a matter of course. In order to make the system work, the "mind" must be separate from the body, an old duality of philosophy to replace the new one of quantum mechanics.
In general this interpretation has received little attention, largely for this last reason.


Objections


Objections that apply to the many-worlds interpretation also apply to the many-mind interpretations. On the surface both of these theories expressly violate Occam's Razor; proponents counter that in fact these solutions minimize entities by simplifying the rules that would be required to describe the universe.
Another serious objection is that workers in no collapse interpretations have produced no more than elementary models based on the definite existence of specific measuring devices. They have assumed, for example, that the Hilbert space of the universe splits naturally into a tensor product structure compatible with the measurement under consideration. They have also assumed, even when describing the behavior of macroscopic objects, that it is appropriate to employ models in which only a few dimensions of Hilbert space are used to describe all the relevant behavior.
In his What is it like to be Schrödinger's cat? (2000), Peter Lewis argues that the many minds interpretation of quantum mechanics has absurd implications for agents facing life-or-death decisions.
In general, the many minds theory holds that a conscious being who observes the outcome of a random zero-sum experiment will evolve into two successors in different observer states, each of whom observes one of the possible outcomes. Moreover, the theory advises you to favor choices in such situations in proportion to the probability that they will bring good results to your various successors. But in a life-or-death case like getting into the box with Schrödinger’s cat, you will only have one successor, since one of the outcomes will ensure your death. So it seems that the many minds interpretation advises you to get in the box with the cat, since it is certain that your only successor will emerge unharmed. See also quantum suicide and immortality.
Finally, it supposes that there is some physical distinction between a conscious observer and a non-conscious measuring device, so it seems to require eliminating the strong Church-Turing hypothesis or postulating a physical model for consciousness.


See also
•Consciousness
•Quantum immortality
•Quantum mind
•Many-worlds interpretation

The Solution to Schrödinger's Cat Paradox

The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics concentrates on a 'classical treatment' of the observer and the observed; leading to a 'collapse of the wavefunction' upon the act of the observation.
This has little to do with the 'quantum phenomenon of entanglement' as is indicated in the Weinberg critique of Copenhagen below.

Summararily, Schrödinger was right in the first instance; BUT this does NOT require a Copenhagen observer.
Schrödinger's Cat is BOTH ALIVE and DEAD as the superposition of quantum selfstates and INDEPENDENT on any classical observer (looking at the cat).
The superposition is the entanglement of the collapsed and the escaped quantum eigenstates.
The cat is a living Particle-Entity with 'consciousness/soul/god' INSIDE as a collapsed wave.
And the cat is a dead Wave-Entity with a 'consciousness/soul/god' OUTSIDE as an escaped wave.
These two eigenstates define QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT of the SIMULTANEOUS CAT, being BOTH a living body and a dead nonbody at the same time.
Why does the human mind find that this is so hard to understand?


Many physicists and philosophers have objected to the Copenhagen interpretation, both on the grounds that it is non-deterministic and that it includes an undefined measurement process that converts probability functions into non-probabilistic measurements. Einstein's comments "I, at any rate, am convinced that He (God) does not throw dice."[14] and "Do you really think the moon isn't there if you aren't looking at it?"[15] exemplify this. Bohr, in response, said "Einstein, don't tell God what to do".


Steven Weinberg in "Einstein's Mistakes", Physics Today, November 2005, page 31, said:

All this familiar story is true, but it leaves out an irony. Bohr's version of quantum mechanics was deeply flawed, but not for the reason Einstein thought. The Copenhagen interpretation describes what happens when an observer makes a measurement, but the observer and the act of measurement are themselves treated classically. This is surely wrong: Physicists and their apparatus must be governed by the same quantum mechanical rules that govern everything else in the universe. But these rules are expressed in terms of a wave function (or, more precisely, a state vector) that evolves in a perfectly deterministic way. So where do the probabilistic rules of the Copenhagen interpretation come from?
Considerable progress has been made in recent years toward the resolution of the problem, which I cannot go into here. It is enough to say that neither Bohr nor Einstein had focused on the real problem with quantum mechanics. The Copenhagen rules clearly work, so they have to be accepted. But this leaves the task of explaining them by applying the deterministic equation for the evolution of the wave function, the Schrödinger equation, to observers and their apparatus.

The problem of thinking in terms of classical measurements of a quantum system becomes particularly acute in the field of quantum cosmology, where the quantum system is the universe.[16]


John Shadow



[MIKE] Certainly Schrödinger's thought problem was originally proposed to show the problems with the Copenhagen interpretation, but even today you get the Cat in the box and a few seconds later you read about collapse of the wave function. It still has not really been resolved. As Gribbon said in one of his books is that the problem with QM is that it is too democratic everyone has an opinion on what it means. All of the interpretations you listed above give the same results they just use differing explanations as to what it means, the philosophy
as Mac puts it. Feynman had two one was a sum over histories and the other was an electron going forward and back in time to interfere with itself. As Gribbon also wrote no one knows what QM means. We use it like a cookbook knowing if we do this we get that but we have no idea why the ingredients do what they do to get the result.

BTW. It does not get much press, but Eugene Wigner's adaptation to Schrödinger's Cat is much more easily understood. The thought problem is called Wigner's Friend. Substitute a human volunteer for the cat. Do the same experiment. At the conclusion, open the door. If the volunteer is still alive, ie the radioactive particle did not decay and release the poison, ask him to describe the transitional states he was theoretically supposed to experience.


Mike, here is the solution without any OBSERVED COLLAPSE of any wavefunction.
Schrödinger's Cat is BOTH ALIVE and DEAD as the superposition of quantum selfstates and INDEPENDENT on any classical observer (looking at the cat).
The superposition is the entanglement of the collapsed and the escaped quantum eigenstates.
The cat is a living Particle-Entity with 'consciousness/soul/god' INSIDE as a collapsed wave.
And the cat is a dead Wave-Entity with a 'consciousness/soul/god' OUTSIDE as an escaped wave.
These two eigenstates define QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT of the Cat in simultaneity, being BOTH a living body and a dead nonbody at the same time.

Why does the human mind find that this is so hard to understand?

[MIKE] Think about Wigner's friend and you should have your answer.

There is more to it Mike. I didn't ask a question, but stated the superposition as quantum fact and thoroughly without any Many-Worlds of splitting universes.
Wigner's argument engages Consciousness and in that aspect he has hit the 'occuli tauri'; but the basis is that this consciousness itself is superposed.
Below is 'my accomplice' in Roger Penrose.


Consciousness and measurement


Wigner designed the experiment to illustrate his belief that consciousness is necessary to the quantum mechanical measurement process. If a material device is substituted for the conscious friend, the linearity of the wave function implies that the state of the system is in a linear sum of possible states. It is simply a larger indeterminate system.
However, a conscious observer (according to his reasoning) must be in either one state or the other, hence conscious observations are different, hence consciousness is material. Wigner discusses this scenario in "Remarks on the mind-body question", one in his collection of essays, Symmetries and Reflections, 1967. The idea has become known as the consciousness causes collapse interpretation.

Consciousness and Superposition


A counterargument is that the superimposition of two conscious states is not paradoxical - just as there is no interaction between the multiple quantum states of a particle, so the superimposed consciousnesses need not be aware of each other.[1]

The state of the observer's perception is considered to be entangled with the state of the cat. The perception state 'I perceive a live cat' accompanies the 'live-cat' state and the perception state 'I perceive a dead cat' accompanies the 'dead-cat' state. [..] It is then assumed that a perceiving being always finds his/her perception state to be in one of these two; accordingly, the cat is, in the perceived world, either alive or dead.[..] I wish to make clear that, as it stands, this is far from a resolution of the cat paradox. For there is nothing in the formalism of quantum mechanics that demands that a state of consciousness cannot involve the simultaneous perception of a live and a dead cat.
-Roger Penrose{C}

I agree with Bill, the Golfer!

The Brain is the Mother to the Father; is the Matter to the Spirit; is the Egg to the Chicken is the RNA to the DNA and is the Physical Creation to the Metaphysical Creator.

They are inextricably connected in the Mind-Body duality and cannot exist independently of each other.
The fatherly forethought (or spirit) can be HIS own father; but requires a (antispiritual) motherly afterthought to birth HIMSELF physically=antispiritually.

The motherly afterthought (or antispirit) can be HER own mother; but requires a (spiritual) fatherly forethought to birth HERSELF metaphysically=spiritually.
The Rooster EXISTS spiritually before he hatches physically from the physical egg and the Ovum EXISTS physically before the release of the chicken spiritualises the encompassment (Eve out of Adam as a 'rib').

The 'Living Brain' is Schrödinger's Cat as a collapsed wave, functioning as a activated particle.
The 'Dead Brain' is Schrödinger's Cat as a collapsed particle, functioning as a activated wave.

Now substitute Wave with Mind and Particle with Body and you have solved the quantum mystery, both in the terms of material physics and immaterial metaphysics.

When a particular 'material vessel of the spirit-matter' becomes damaged, too old or deceased; then the encompassing matter (read the physical universe as a matter waveform) will UNCOLLAPSE the hitherto COLLAPSED Schrödinger cat ) and the 'Mind' will 'escape' from the brain (or the cells or all of the other consciousness carriers defined in the hydrogen atom's polarisations etc).
And Seth is an excellent 'channel'; indeed all so termed gods and demons are created by and through the 'mind of the consciousness carriers', archetyped by 'man'.

It is every 'man' for himherself in these 'last days' before the universe itself will transform its spacetime matrix.
Every 'manwoman' has the 'Job' of composition; writing a Story for the 'Unity of the Creator-Creation Duality'.
The duality, which caused the 'split' between mind and body and between metaphysics and physics and between matter and spirit is itself in expectation of recombination.
But ONLY the storytellers within space and time can fulfil the reunion.
The storytellers without space and time, inclusive all the dead alive ones (collapsed particular kittens) DEPEND on the storytellers within to USE their 'brainy imprisonments' to REHARMONISE the original separation.

Hans Schatten aka John Shadow aka Tonyblue

The Presence of the Mosaic implies the will of Unity=God=Starhumanity and not the will of Humanity=Man=Separation!

FUTURE SHADOWS OF THE PAST

"A most wondrous thing the Shadow is, a redeemer in all to succour;
it can go where the light cannot abide, seemingly banished, it is not.
For where the light is, the darkness flees, no longer present to endure;
so to become illuminated is its destined journey and its troubled lot.

But without the light, no Shadow can be cast, its such a splendid key;
the dimensions reduce in space from three to two and all in just the one.
Betwixt the light and the darkness it is and part of both for all to see;
the Shadow of the body, does it not merge all in its rule under the sun?

Whatsoever can cast a Shadow, must be a most wondrous thing to relay;
as nature's very own offspring, the young ones grow towards their final goal.
Enabled to bring peace to so many things appearing apart and so far away;
the reconciliation for the suffering body with its spirit and its scattered soul."

http://cosmosdawn.com (Elders of Thuban Social Network)
http://tonyb.freeyellow.com and http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/quantumrelativity

I have Nassim Haramein on my radio show this evening and we talked about this afterwards. He said that there was a major error in the calculation. The GPS setting for the experiement was focused on the wrong place, giving it a much faster speed than it really was. But he did agree with things going faster then light and will explain it on the next show.

t

A Link shared by Brook of Egyptological renown.

Einstein was right, neutrino researchers admit

June 8, 2012 by Harumi Ozawa

http://phys.org/news/2012-06-einstein-neutrino.html



A team of scientists who last year suggested neutrinos could travel faster than light conceded Friday that Einstein was right and the sub-atomic particles are -- like everything else -- bound by the universe's speed limit.

Scientists on Friday said that an experiment which challenged Einstein's theory on the speed of light had been flawed and that sub-atomic particles -- like everything else -- are indeed bound by the universe's speed limit.
Researchers working at the European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) caused a storm last year when they published experimental results showing that neutrinos could out-pace light by some six kilometres (3.7 miles) per second.

The findings threatened to upend modern physics and smash a hole in Albert Einstein's 1905 theory of special relativity, which described the velocity of light as the maximum speed in the cosmos. But CERN now says that the earlier results were wrong and faulty kit was to blame. "Although this result isn't as exciting as some would have liked, it is what we all expected deep down," said the centre's research director Sergio Bertolucci.

"The story captured the public imagination, and has given people the opportunity to see the scientific method in action. "An unexpected result was put up for scrutiny, thoroughly investigated and resolved in part thanks to collaboration between normally competing experiments. That's how science moves forward." The neutrinos were timed on the journey from CERN's giant underground lab near Geneva to the Gran Sasso Laboratory in Italy, after travelling 732 kilometres (454 miles) through the Earth's crust.

To do the trip, the neutrinos should have taken 0.0024 seconds. Instead, the particles were recorded as hitting the detectors in Italy 0.00000006 seconds sooner than expected, the preliminary experiment had shown. Researchers updated the science community on Friday at the International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, being held in Japan's ancient capital of Kyoto.

"The previous data taken up to 2011 with the neutrino beam from CERN to Gran Sasso were revised taking into account understood instrumental effects," the team said. "A coherent picture has emerged with both previous and new data pointing to a neutrino velocity consistent with the speed of light."

The initial findings had been greeted with a combination of excitement and scepticism, even from those involved in the experiment, who urged other physicists to carry out their own checks to corroborate or refute what had been seen. "If this result at CERN is proved to be right, and particles are found to travel faster than the speed of light, then I am prepared to eat my shorts, live on TV," Jim Al-Khalili, a professor of theoretical physics at Britain's University of Surrey, declared at the time. (c) 2012 AFP

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-06-einstein-neutrino.html#jCp