WE WON! Federal Court Rules That
Fluoridation Chemicals Pose An "Unreasonable Risk" To Health
Fluoridation Chemicals Pose An "Unreasonable Risk" To Health
BRAVO.... Michael Connett, Paul Connett, Ellen Connett, & all of the Fluoride Action Network Nationwide!
YEAAA! What GREAT news!
Yep...this is the same fluoride that killed 8 of our horses and 4 of our dogs, and so many others here in Pagosa Springs. Proven through necropsy at Cornell University by the world's authority on fluoride poisoning in animals.
On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:52 PM, Fluoride Action Network <mail@networkforgood.com> wrote:
WE WON! Federal Court Rules That Fluoridation Chemicals Pose An "Unreasonable Risk" To Health
Dear Friends,
https://fluoridealert.org/key-topics/epa-lawsuit/
History has been made. After 7 years of pursuing legal action against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the risk posed to the developing brain by the practice of water fluoridation, the United States District Court of the Northern District of California has just ruled on behalf of the Fluoride Action Network and the plaintiffs in our precedent-setting court case. A U.S. federal court has now deemed fluoridation an "unreasonable risk" to the health of children, and the EPA will be forced to regulate it as such. The decision is written very strongly in our favor, and we will share it in its entirety tomorrow. Below is an excerpt from the introduction of the ruling:
"The issue before this Court is whether the Plaintiffs have established by a preponderance of the evidence that the fluoridation of drinking water at levels typical in the United States poses an unreasonable risk of injury to health of the public within the meaning of Amended TSCA. For the reasons set forth below, the Court so finds. Specifically, the Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter ("mg/L") – the level presently considered "optimal" in the United States – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children..the Court finds there is an unreasonable risk of such injury, a risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response...One thing the EPA cannot do, however, in the face of this Court's finding, is to ignore that risk."
In this moment, I want to recognize attorney Michael Connett for pursuing this case and leading the effort every step of the way. He's a true superhero to all of us here at FAN. Many other amazing team members were also involved in making this a reality and deserve great appreciation and thanks, including our co-plaintiffs and all of you who donated and spread the word about our case. Take a moment to celebrate this momentous occasion tonight, wherever you are. After 7 years, we all deserve it.
Please stay tuned as we will provide further comprehensive details in a press release and bulletin tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Stuart Cooper
Executive Director
Fluoride Action Network
