Vidya Moksha Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:07 pm
I downloaded the 'paper' Dr Young produced..
It is junk,in terms of a scientific report.
I really do not want to spend any more energy on this subject. It is junk science and misdirection.
For example.. he says he has photographed the PEG lipid carriers, they are 50-100 nanometres. That's 0.0005 to 0.001 millimetres. He is then claiming to see the graphene at 100 xs optical magnification.
0.001 mm x 100 = 0.1mm. He can see particles that came from inside a sperical ball that measured 0.1mm with the naked eye?
The paper is poorly written. Too emotive, too much conjecture.
There is also a warning sign common to all these reports. It is a trigger to watch out for. They never keep to the facts. Once they claim to have isolated graphene dioxide they immediately jump to all the places in the body where it will accumulate, what damage it will do, how toxic it is. All this from one photograph!
It is just wrong.
All wrong.
Both the spanish lab and Dr Young claims of graphene oxide are pure nonsense.
That's all from me folks! I have much better things to spend my time on.
I know this thread was re-directed to vaccines, away from its original purpose. Graphene tech is coming! or it already here. But graphene and vaccines is off my table.