The human race already has an undercover, unsuspected AI at work within their minds. That is the first thing to sort out and make clear on one's way to knowledge and freedom.
There is no surprise there is so much talk on transhumanism going on nowadays. Consciousness will always put triggers, clues or prompters on our way to have us wake up. As within so without.
The Origin of Internal Dialog-Don Juan Matus-Carlos Castaneda and others
"An alien abductee has come forward and publicly revealed the plan extraterrestrials have for humanity in the next few years. After being abducted by aliens for the last 17 years of his life, the anonymous abductee says he wants to share his experience with the public so they can learn the truth about extraterrestrials.
The terms alien abduction or abduction phenomenon describe “subjectively real memories of being taken secretly against one’s will by apparently nonhuman entities and subjected to complex physical and psychological procedures”. Such abductions have sometimes been classified as close encounters of the fourth kind. People claiming to have been abducted are usually called “abductees”or “experiencers”.
Due to a lack of objective physical evidence, most scientists and mental health professionals dismiss the phenomenon as “deception, suggestibility (fantasy-proneness, hypnotizability, false memory syndrome), personality, sleep paralysis, psychopathology, psychodynamics [and] environmental factors”. Skeptic Robert Sheaffer sees similarity between the aliens depicted in science fiction films, in particular, Invaders From Mars, and some of those reported to have actually abducted people.
Typical claims involve being subjected to forced medical examinations that emphasize abductee reproductive systems. Abductees sometimes claim to have been warned against environmental abuse and the dangers of nuclear weapons. While many of these claimed encounters are described as terrifying, some have been viewed as pleasurable or transformative. via Wikipedia"
_________________ What is life? It is the flash of a firefly in the night, the breath of a buffalo in the wintertime. It is the little shadow which runs across the grass and loses itself in the sunset. With deepest respect ~ Aloha & Mahalo, Carol
Carol wrote:I don't worry about it N. Whatever is, is. As for the gravity waves I was watching the various video presentations but don't remember who was putting it out. However, it looked genuine. I think I may have posted that link in the weather thread.
Sorry Carol , i wasnt implying you being fearful , i meant to say that in a general sense.
As for ratification of any phenomena i would not put stock in a video no matter how convincing it is. I have made my stance on Nibiru clear in the past ...
In this instance the only way to know is to conduct the experiment and see the results, otherwise its hot air... like the whole Alien fear factory propaganda machine... its a recent trend constructed for a purpose to serve very few.
Where was the fear of aliens in the 1920's ? the average person had no idea they even existed ..
If they were a threat why didnt our architecture change over the last 2000 years ? why are we still building on the surface of the planet when the threats come from the sky ? surely if they were a threat a trend of subterranean living would have been far more wide spread indeed if it was happening over the last 2000 years we would have many historical accounts as well.
Same thing for Nibiru ... someone saw an opportunity in spreading a false story that could not be ratified and profited from it. Its a waste of time ...
"An alien abductee has come forward and publicly revealed the plan extraterrestrials have for humanity in the next few years. After being abducted by aliens for the last 17 years of his life, the anonymous abductee says he wants to share his experience with the public so they can learn the truth about extraterrestrials.
The terms alien abduction or abduction phenomenon describe “subjectively real memories of being taken secretly against one’s will by apparently nonhuman entities and subjected to complex physical and psychological procedures”. Such abductions have sometimes been classified as close encounters of the fourth kind. People claiming to have been abducted are usually called “abductees”or “experiencers”.
Due to a lack of objective physical evidence, most scientists and mental health professionals dismiss the phenomenon as “deception, suggestibility (fantasy-proneness, hypnotizability, false memory syndrome), personality, sleep paralysis, psychopathology, psychodynamics [and] environmental factors”. Skeptic Robert Sheaffer sees similarity between the aliens depicted in science fiction films, in particular, Invaders From Mars, and some of those reported to have actually abducted people.
Typical claims involve being subjected to forced medical examinations that emphasize abductee reproductive systems. Abductees sometimes claim to have been warned against environmental abuse and the dangers of nuclear weapons. While many of these claimed encounters are described as terrifying, some have been viewed as pleasurable or transformative. via Wikipedia"
Oh dear I haven't watched enough Hollywood movies to get accustomed to these creepy beasts you posted in that first video above Swanny. Can you imagine having them unleashed in town and having one of those chasing you ? What are they going to use them for ?
An AI professor explains: three concerns about granting citizenship to robot Sophia
I was surprised to hear that a robot named Sophia was granted citizenship by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The announcement last week followed the Kingdom’s commitment of US$500 billion to build a new city powered by robotics and renewables.
One of the most honourable concepts for a human being, to be a citizen and all that brings with it, has been given to a machine. As a professor who works daily on making AI and autonomous systems more trustworthy, I don’t believe human society is ready yet for citizen robots.
To grant a robot citizenship is a declaration of trust in a technology that I believe is not yet trustworthy. It brings social and ethical concerns that we as humans are not yet ready to manage. Robot Sophia is officially a citizen of Saudi Arabia. Who is Sophia?
Sophia is a robot developed by the Hong Kong-based company Hanson Robotics. Sophia has a female face that can display emotions. Sophia speaks English. Sophia makes jokes. You could have a reasonably intelligent conversation with Sophia.
Sophia’s creator is Dr David Hanson, a 2007 PhD graduate from the University of Texas.
Sophia is reminiscent of “Johnny 5”, the first robot to become a US citizen in the 1986 movie Short Circuit. But Johnny 5 was a mere idea, something dreamt up by comic science fiction writers S. S. Wilson and Brent Maddock.
Did the writers imagine that in around 30 years their fiction would become a reality?
Risk to citizenship
Citizenship – in my opinion, the most honourable status a country grants for its people – is facing an existential risk.
As a researcher who advocates for designing autonomous systems that are trustworthy, I know the technology is not ready yet.
We have many challenges that we need to overcome before we can truly trust these systems. For example, we don’t yet have reliable mechanisms to assure us that these intelligent systems will always behave ethically and in accordance with our moral values, or to protect us against them taking a wrong action with catastrophic consequences.
Here are three reasons I think it is a premature decision to grant Sophia citizenship.
1. Defining identity
Citizenship is granted to a unique identity.
Each of us, humans I mean, possesses a unique signature that distinguishes us from any other human. When we get through customs without talking to a human, our identity is automatically established using an image of our face, iris and fingerprint. My PhD student establishes human identity by analysing humans’ brain waves.
Read more: We all need to forget, even robots
What gives Sophia her identity? Her MAC address? A barcode, a unique skin mark, an audio mark in her voice, an electromagnetic signature similar to human brain waves?
These and other technological identity management protocols are all possible, but they do not establish Sophia’s identity – they can only establish hardware identity. What then is Sophia’s identity?
To me, identity is a multidimensional construct. It sits at the intersection of who we are biologically, cognitively, and as defined by every experience, culture, and environment we encountered. It’s not clear where Sophia fits in this description.
2. Legal rights
For the purposes of this article, let’s assume that Sophia the citizen robot is able to vote. But who is making the decision on voting day – Sophia or the manufacturer?
Presumably also Sophia the citizen is “liable” to pay income taxes because Sophia has a legal identity independent of its creator, the company.
Sophia must also have the right for equal protection similar to other citizens by law.
Consider this hypothetical scenario: a policeman sees Sophia and a woman each being attacked by a person. That policeman can only protect one of them: who should it be? Is it right if the policeman chooses Sophia because Sophia walks on wheels and has no skills for self-defence?
I am away for a little while and came back to inform about the impending AI danger but i see it is already posted here so good job. See the robot Sophia is a Saudi citizen now and you may have seen the pic with the Saudi king and Donald Trump touching a palantir...
It's funny that Saudi Arabia now has a new data center called Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology when Saudi Arabia has long been one of the foremost exporter of extreme ideology and terror.
Islam will play a vital role in the New World Order in fact it is the "false prophet" and the "second beast coming out of the earth" spoken of in the Book of Revelation. And this AI is in Revelation called the "image of the beast" whill will cause to kill all who will not worship it.
SkyNet or SingularityNet is online and will digitally control and communicate with everything also human beings which means a chip which must be what is called the "mark of the beast" in Revelation.
As you can see this is all foretold by Jesus so you all got a choice to make within maybe a year... will you be a slave to the New World Order or will you choose God your Maker ?
Hey Red as you're bringing religion in to it here's a great post from someone on youtube that explains it perfectly
Bob Burton 1 day ago What I find fascinating is how so many people who claim to hate the 'elite' - I agree it is inappropriate, but we know who we mean - are religious. It's mind blowing. Who wrote the books relating to all religions? It wasn't god, that much is guaranteed. Who could read and write back then? Not the masses - again, guaranteed. The' elite' invented religion to control the masses. How can you, if you claim to be awake, not realise that? This is religion in a nutshell. Do exactly as your 'betters' tell you. Pay your taxes to enrich them further. What little you have left, donate to an incredibly rich church that has more money than it knows what to do with. Never rebel against authority. Do not kill - except in religious wars of course. So on and so forth. So, although by following these laws of a god there is no evidence for, your life will be shitty, worry not, because the church that demands this of you guarantees that WHEN YOU DIE you will go to a heaven there is zero evidence of. When you die?!!! PL-ease, do me a favour. Religion is undoubtedly the 'elites' greatest ever achievement. Crown and church were always closely connected for a reason. In fact, back in the day, the eldest son inherited the family fortune whilst the youngest son trotted off to become a high ranking church official, so he could help the crown maintain control. Not much has changed since then. Who is the Defender of the Faith in Britain? The fcuking Queen, or King, depending who is in power. All political leaders with real power claim to be religious. Why? You can work that out surely? Did we not just witness Clinton and Comey - two allegedly fine Christians - swear on the Bible to tell the truth, before launching into lie after lie? Clinton now hopes to save her scrawny neck by saying she wants to become a pastor ffs. I could go on forever about hypocrisy in all religions but I'd be dead of old age before I finished. Religion is an 'elite' control mechanism and you cannot seriously claim to be awake whilst swallowing that crap. It's all about the afterlife with religion. The afterlife and its rewards. Do you ever hear of an imam strapping bombs to himself? Surely if he believed that XXXX he would willingly rush into the arms of Allah to claim his virgins, but no, he's busy persuading the gullible to do it for him. Religion and gullible - two words you cannot separate. It's all a lie to keep you in your place and not rebel against the so called elite. As Jordan just pointed out, they've been in control for millennia. It is inevitable that they invented it for that purpose. The uneducated in the dark ages had no education except what priests taught them. They had an excuse. There is no excuse now. Wake the fcuk up. wrote:
Thanks but I won't chose either of those rubbish options
Michael, Carol, Mudra, and Pris, on the 'Mists of Avalon'?? There is a flower Within my heart, Daisy, Daisy! Planted one day By a glancing dart, Planted by Daisy Bell! Whether she loves me Or loves me not, Sometimes it's hard to tell; Yet I am longing to share the lot - Of beautiful Daisy Bell!
Daisy, Daisy, Give me your answer do! I'm half crazy, All for the love of you! It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage But you'll look sweet upon the seat Of a bicycle built for two.
We will go “tandem” As man and wife, Daisy, Daisy! “Peddling” away Down the road of life, I and my Daisy Bell! When the road's dark We can both despise P'licemen and “lamps” as well; There are “bright lights” In the dazzling eyes Of beautiful Daisy Bell!
Daisy, Daisy, Give me your answer do! I'm half crazy, All for the love of you! It won't be a stylish marriage, I can't afford a carriage But you'll look sweet upon the seat Of a bicycle built for two.
I will stand by you In weal or woe, Daisy, Daisy! You'll be the bell(e) Which I'll ring you know! Sweet little Daisy Bell! You'll take the “lead” In each “trip” we take, Then if I don't do well, I will permit you to Use the brake, My beautiful Daisy Bell! "Michael, Michael, here is your answer true!! You are crazy to think I’d marry you!! If you can’t afford a carriage, you can’t afford a marriage!! And I’ll be damned if I’ll be crammed On a bicycle built for two!!"
mudra wrote:An AI professor explains: three concerns about granting citizenship to robot Sophia
I was surprised to hear that a robot named Sophia was granted citizenship by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The announcement last week followed the Kingdom’s commitment of US$500 billion to build a new city powered by robotics and renewables.
One of the most honourable concepts for a human being, to be a citizen and all that brings with it, has been given to a machine. As a professor who works daily on making AI and autonomous systems more trustworthy, I don’t believe human society is ready yet for citizen robots.
To grant a robot citizenship is a declaration of trust in a technology that I believe is not yet trustworthy. It brings social and ethical concerns that we as humans are not yet ready to manage. Robot Sophia is officially a citizen of Saudi Arabia. Who is Sophia?
Sophia is a robot developed by the Hong Kong-based company Hanson Robotics. Sophia has a female face that can display emotions. Sophia speaks English. Sophia makes jokes. You could have a reasonably intelligent conversation with Sophia.
Sophia’s creator is Dr David Hanson, a 2007 PhD graduate from the University of Texas.
Sophia is reminiscent of “Johnny 5”, the first robot to become a US citizen in the 1986 movie Short Circuit. But Johnny 5 was a mere idea, something dreamt up by comic science fiction writers S. S. Wilson and Brent Maddock.
Did the writers imagine that in around 30 years their fiction would become a reality?
Risk to citizenship
Citizenship – in my opinion, the most honourable status a country grants for its people – is facing an existential risk.
As a researcher who advocates for designing autonomous systems that are trustworthy, I know the technology is not ready yet.
We have many challenges that we need to overcome before we can truly trust these systems. For example, we don’t yet have reliable mechanisms to assure us that these intelligent systems will always behave ethically and in accordance with our moral values, or to protect us against them taking a wrong action with catastrophic consequences.
Here are three reasons I think it is a premature decision to grant Sophia citizenship.
1. Defining identity
Citizenship is granted to a unique identity.
Each of us, humans I mean, possesses a unique signature that distinguishes us from any other human. When we get through customs without talking to a human, our identity is automatically established using an image of our face, iris and fingerprint. My PhD student establishes human identity by analysing humans’ brain waves.
Read more: We all need to forget, even robots
What gives Sophia her identity? Her MAC address? A barcode, a unique skin mark, an audio mark in her voice, an electromagnetic signature similar to human brain waves?
These and other technological identity management protocols are all possible, but they do not establish Sophia’s identity – they can only establish hardware identity. What then is Sophia’s identity?
To me, identity is a multidimensional construct. It sits at the intersection of who we are biologically, cognitively, and as defined by every experience, culture, and environment we encountered. It’s not clear where Sophia fits in this description.
2. Legal rights
For the purposes of this article, let’s assume that Sophia the citizen robot is able to vote. But who is making the decision on voting day – Sophia or the manufacturer?
Presumably also Sophia the citizen is “liable” to pay income taxes because Sophia has a legal identity independent of its creator, the company.
Sophia must also have the right for equal protection similar to other citizens by law.
Consider this hypothetical scenario: a policeman sees Sophia and a woman each being attacked by a person. That policeman can only protect one of them: who should it be? Is it right if the policeman chooses Sophia because Sophia walks on wheels and has no skills for self-defence?
RedEzra wrote:I am away for a little while and came back to inform about the impending AI danger but i see it is already posted here so good job. See the robot Sophia is a Saudi citizen now and you may have seen the pic with the Saudi king and Donald Trump touching a palantir...
It's funny that Saudi Arabia now has a new data center called Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology when Saudi Arabia has long been one of the foremost exporter of extreme ideology and terror.
Islam will play a vital role in the New World Order in fact it is the "false prophet" and the "second beast coming out of the earth" spoken of in the Book of Revelation. And this AI is in Revelation called the "image of the beast" whill will cause to kill all who will not worship it.
SkyNet or SingularityNet is online and will digitally control and communicate with everything also human beings which means a chip which must be what is called the "mark of the beast" in Revelation.
As you can see this is all foretold by Jesus so you all got a choice to make within maybe a year... will you be a slave to the New World Order or will you choose God your Maker ?
Swanny wrote:Hey Red as you're bringing religion in to it here's a great post from someone on youtube that explains it perfectly
Bob Burton 1 day ago wrote: What I find fascinating is how so many people who claim to hate the 'elite' - I agree it is inappropriate, but we know who we mean - are religious. It's mind blowing. Who wrote the books relating to all religions? It wasn't god, that much is guaranteed. Who could read and write back then? Not the masses - again, guaranteed. The' elite' invented religion to control the masses. How can you, if you claim to be awake, not realise that? This is religion in a nutshell. Do exactly as your 'betters' tell you. Pay your taxes to enrich them further. What little you have left, donate to an incredibly rich church that has more money than it knows what to do with. Never rebel against authority. Do not kill - except in religious wars of course. So on and so forth. So, although by following these laws of a god there is no evidence for, your life will be shitty, worry not, because the church that demands this of you guarantees that WHEN YOU DIE you will go to a heaven there is zero evidence of. When you die?!!! PL-ease, do me a favour. Religion is undoubtedly the 'elites' greatest ever achievement. Crown and church were always closely connected for a reason. In fact, back in the day, the eldest son inherited the family fortune whilst the youngest son trotted off to become a high ranking church official, so he could help the crown maintain control. Not much has changed since then.
Who is the Defender of the Faith in Britain? The fcuking Queen, or King, depending who is in power. All political leaders with real power claim to be religious. Why? You can work that out surely? Did we not just witness Clinton and Comey - two allegedly fine Christians - swear on the Bible to tell the truth, before launching into lie after lie? Clinton now hopes to save her scrawny neck by saying she wants to become a pastor ffs. I could go on forever about hypocrisy in all religions but I'd be dead of old age before I finished. Religion is an 'elite' control mechanism and you cannot seriously claim to be awake whilst swallowing that crap. It's all about the afterlife with religion. The afterlife and its rewards. Do you ever hear of an imam strapping bombs to himself? Surely if he believed that XXXX he would willingly rush into the arms of Allah to claim his virgins, but no, he's busy persuading the gullible to do it for him. Religion and gullible - two words you cannot separate. It's all a lie to keep you in your place and not rebel against the so called elite. As Jordan just pointed out, they've been in control for millennia. It is inevitable that they invented it for that purpose. The uneducated in the dark ages had no education except what priests taught them. They had an excuse. There is no excuse now. Wake the fcuk up.
Thanks but I won't chose either of those rubbish options.
NANUXII wrote:
giovonni wrote:
Somewhat related information...
Just published and also worth the full read ...
How Chrome ad blocking is already changing the web Read more below ...
no prizes as to whose adverts will be allowed to still work ...
anything designed by microsoft or google is not your friend.
NANUXII wrote:
my apologies if i sounded a little full on just then Gio , i am going through a bit of a full on phase right now ... energies have shifted to position for something on the horizon.
its too quiet
hmmmmm
N N
To say "It's Too Late!!" at this point would be the "Understatement of the Millennium". I've honestly seen this coming for a very-long time in this incarnation, and probably lifetime after lifetime, somewhere and/or somewhen. My threads on Project Avalon and The Mists of Avalon have referenced "Sinister-Technology" and the "Mean-Queen Theme" for close to ten-years. This Present Quest began on Monday, February 18, 2008. http://krlll.com/ Before that, I had basically given-up, and now I'm wishing I hadn't tried to help. NANUXII, things have been "too quiet" for several-years. I suspect that things have been "artificially-elevated" and will be "mercilessly-deflated" by nefarious-beings in the nether-realms (who might have Sirius-Issues with Humanity, going way, way, way back). 'RA' refused to answer most of my questions regarding all of the above (and more) but I got the message just the same. Oddly, I've recently been thinking in terms of Enki, Enlil, and HAL 9000 (regarding the past 10,000 to 15,000 years). 'The United States of the Solar System (Book 4)' should be extremely revealing to anyone patient enough to endure my tripe for several months of intense study. I know I didn't 'get it right', but I suspect that many who give this thread an honest study will 'get it right' even if I never do. One last time, I've removed all of my internet-posting from all significant-tables (real and imaginary). I intended my tripe for a select alternative-research audience (for educational and entertainment purposes only).
The Bible, Ellen White, and Church History might not be as neat and clean as we might wish them to be. They often seem to "mock the longings of the sin-sick soul." Adventism (and all religious-organizations) desire solutions to their problems, and much more, but the real story of Earth and Humanity might be more difficult to deal with than even the best and brightest in Ivy-League Universities are capable of properly researching. Adventism's solutions seem to reside in carefully picking and choosing. But really, Pluralistic-Education and Making-Money often seem to be much more important than Honest and Thorough Biblical-Research in the Context of Life, the Universe, and Everything. I've come very close to reading Volume Four (Isaiah to Malachi) of the SDA Bible Commentary, straight-through, over and over, year after year, just to see where this leads. BTW, what is the definitive Intertestamental Old-Testament Commentary?? Why isn't the New-Testament essentially an Old-Testament Commentary?? Should the Five-Solae somehow apply to the New-Testament?? Many have found Peale appalling and Paul appealing, and Luther didn't think Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation should've been included in the Canonical-Scriptures. Over the last few years, I've become painfully aware of severe criticism of the Pauline-Epistles (genuine and otherwise). I've attempted to remain responsibly-neutral, but just for conversations-sake, if we remove the 13 letters attributed to Paul, and the 4 books Luther didn't approve of, we are left with 10 NT books. Modern scholars have raised serious issues regarding the Historicity of the first five NT books, so perhaps they should go too!! This would leave us with five short apostolic letters!! Upon This Rock?? Consider the following Minimal-List: Genesis, Deuteronomy, Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, Daniel, Luke, Acts, 1&2 Corinthians, Hebrews, James, John, and Revelation. Upon THIS Rock??
That 'Daisy' parody-reply is attributable to Dinah Shore (or is it 'Human-Error'?). http://www.exelana.com/lyrics/DaisyBell.html Anyway, it's not my invention, but I wish it were. Notice the use of the name 'Michael'?? Remember that Dinah Shore interviewed John Denver in 'Oh, God!'?? Is the non-existence of www.themistsofavalon a coincidental setback?? My website www.redletterchurch.net was removed from my ownership (despite being paid-up), and the web-address was subsequently removed from the internet (at least 7 or 8 years ago). I was afraid to investigate. I see that the .org version (which I never had anything to do with) has been suspended. In the original 'Stargate' movie, RA said "I Created Your Civilization, and Now I Will Destroy It!!" I've tried to discover legitimate Biblical-Detours around the usual Hal Lindsey 'Great Late Planet Earth' mumbo-jumbo, but this exercise in futility seems to have been completely-ignored. I never claimed (in this life) to have the 'Answer'. I simply attempted to stimulate thinking and discussion, but that didn't fracking happen. I think I'm going to go watch 'I, Tonya' to try to get my head together. I spent the past week driving a $50,000 SUV (which I rented) and that didn't remedy my sad state of mind. An 'Agent-Type' told me story after story after story (in a theatrical-manner) as I waited for a train at 4:00 AM!! He reminded me of Lynn Cassidy in 'Men Who Stare at Goats'!! What Would Kerry Lynn Cassidy Say?? What Would Dr. Edwin Krupp Do??
There are some really crazy conspiracy theories out there! There are also some really crazy little green-men theories out there! The theories are out there! Follow the tin-foil hats! The following is a vast no-wing conspiracy theory…and does not reflect the even crazier conspiracy theories of the author…
Was Jesus an extraterrestrial? He came down from Heaven, didn't He? Is this true for all of us? When He ascended into Heaven…was He beamed up into the Father-Ship…into the Most Holy Place of a Heavenly Sanctuary? Do you believe in UFO's? Have you ever seen one? I have, and I have spoken with other people who have. They seemed to be very credible. I met an astronaut who walked on the moon. We talked about life after death…of all things! It was out of this body…I mean out of this world! Some people don't believe in God. They believe in extraterrestrials from outer-space! Are God and Satan ET‘s? What if Satan is a little green woman? If we made contact, would it be a close encounter of the worst kind?
If a UFO shows up...how do you know if it's good or evil? Are there good and evil ET's? Did aliens supervise the construction of the Pyramids in ancient Egypt? Are we prisoners or slaves of aliens? Were Moses and Jesus…rebel Pharaohs...determined to set us free? Did Moses have a long term plan of salvation from alien oppression…which included writing the Torah and the Teachings of Jesus? Is the God of the Old Testament a bad ET…and the God of the New Testament a good ET?
Did the Nazis build and fly UFO's? Did U.S. scientists help Nazi scientists build UFO's at Area 51? Do humans travel to other planets in UFO’s? Do Presidents make treaties with, and take orders from…aliens? Do we have joint alien-human bases on the moon…dating back to the 50‘s? Are nuclear weapons intended for aliens rather than humans? Did a future President order a limo driver to shoot a President with a pellet gun to keep him from revealing our involvement with aliens? Did a future President refuse the request of a President for classified information regarding the extent of our involvement with aliens? Did ET phone Rome…and then call 911? Were hijackings superimposed onto military exercises…and then the whole operation hijacked by someone or something else? Don't ask me...this is an alien subject and I'm not a rocket scientist or a ufologist! I’m not even a botanist or a herpetologist! I’m just living in my own little…Dreamland…
This subject is a real minefield and crop-circle field, and frankly I don't know much about UFO‘s and ET‘s. I'm not sure I want to know too much! If I knew too much...black helicopters would undoubtedly appear over my house! Men in Black would knock on my door! I’m already more nervous than Don Knotts! I’m already paranoid…but then they really would be out to get me! I once spoke with a UFO researcher who said privately that she sometimes wished that she had never researched UFO's! Researchers beware! Stay out of space! Especially the Moon and Mars! I spoke with a very beautiful woman who was instructed by Warner Von Braun to devote her life to keeping nuclear weapons out of space. I’m standing there talking to a gorgeous woman about nuclear war? What a dork I was! Are we involved in a real Star Wars? The Empire might strike back! Perhaps we could convince the Empire to strike Bach…instead of that silly five-note tune! Perhaps they have come to save us _____________________________________________
THIS HATE SPEECH WILL BE SILENCED BY THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON IN 5 SECONDS…4...3...2...1 ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ LOG OFF……END SURVEILLANCE __________________________________________________ MISSION ACCOMPLISHED……THE___________________________________________________ HOMELAND HAS BEEN SECURED__________________________________________________ OMNIPOTENT HIGHNESS KRLLL __________________________________________________ HAS SOVERIEGN CONTROL OF US__________________________________________________ MJ12 - 666 - EYES ONLY - NOT FOR_________________________________________________ PUBLIC VIEWING-S4 DEBRIEFINGS _________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________The End.
