AS ABOVE SO BELOW
lawlessline wrote:XXXX I KNEW THERE WAS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE 60° AS WELL.
It Should have been 30° N and 30° South. NOT 60° N or South.
As said before just trying to understand.
The 19.5° is if you then go a layer below the full consciousness. On this diagram you can see this in the RED tetrahedron sitting under the surface of the greater sphere.
Know what you mean my lovely. Just get a bee under the bonnet with this one. I'll do a bit of Mapping on google and see what I come up with and keep you posted.
If you are talking tea count me in.
Pris wrote:NANUXII wrote:hey Pris ,
i can understand opening a thread some may want to dig into finer points that appeal to them. dont take it personally , let it evolve ( hugs )
re your statement here
" All the five platonic 'solids' ('divine' geometries) fit inside the 'star tetrahedron'. That means that all the equilateral vibrational forms possible (equal-sided energy forms) are all contained inside this 'star'. Perhaps, fluctuations between these frequencies gives way to imperfections and mutations... life is never perfect, never perfectly symmetrical... which is what is the foundation of all life and matter in all its diversity (based on my own observations and conclusions stolen from everyone else, of course). cheers "
As a right brain creative basic building blocks are essential to design. to the left brain external forces distorting building blocks are essential to outcomes or functionality of design. both are relevant and this is why design creatives dont work in the same office as tech crew generally speaking.
Eg. ( not directed at you Pris ) build a house out of bricks , the bricks are a certain size , lets say for arguments sake they are perfectly the same size ( like a platonic ). Once they have been used in a construction like a house the bricks are no longer the same size proportionally by the forces exerted on them. Energetically the vibrations around the brick can also affect its structure so then its a multiplier or divider of change also.
So what we do not take into account with sacred geometry is this , Platonics are building blocks , final creations are the result of Platonics multiplied or divided by external forces. The external forces are the calculatory difference within this argument.
Hey how is this weather by the way , good day for a BBQ i think :0)
External? Now THAT'S funny. What makes you think anything is 'external'?
I hazard to say we are inside a gigantic star tetrahedron. Where do you think all these so-called 'external forces' are coming from?
Besides, 'as above so below'. What is 'external' is 'internal'.
Pris wrote:NANUXII wrote:For you Pris i will explain it in a language you can understand , Meow Meow prrr prrr
For the rest of us ....
You wish to explain things to me in a way I will stand under? Now, them's fightin' words, Nanu.
Besides, I thought I just explained it purrrrfectly well.