If you just want to realise how little they care for human life just look at Fukushima, and the credible evidence that it was a man made disaster. And how much attention does this potentially global extinction event receive?
There are all manner of ways in which we are poisoned at every level of the food chain and many ways many people are not even aware of.
GMO foods? Massive pesticide use? I wont go on, you get the idea.
At the end of the day you kill something by not giving it energy, fighting something often gives your energy to feed that which is being fought.
I realised a long time ago that governments don’t have any money of their own and only spend peoples money. I also realised I shouldn’t eat food with a bar code on it, food comes from the earth, without the need for toxic chemicals. I do ok, I give my energy mostly where i want to, and I was purposely oblivious to all world concerns for many years... until Fukushima, when I realised the bastards could pour radiation on my head wherever I was in the world…
That’s was a bit of a wake up again and I started looking at the net again to see what was going on out there….
I have seen a ridiculous increase in what I used to call chem trails, I have always spent a lot of time out of doors and I watch the skies. I cant remember such skies in my younger days, certainly 70’s onwards…
I was interested to see what was in the chemtrails, mostly to see how it will effect the wildlife and aquatic life. The wee beasties in water are quite sensitive to chemical poisons and they would be the first to show signs.. the problem is that pollutants come from everywhere these days, and now thatns to our friends at Monsatan even the plants themselves produce poison… you couldn’t make this XXXX up, no one would believe you….
On a complete digress a friend of mine laughs at me for never using microwave ovens, to the point of refusing food cooked in one. I wanted to look at the effects of microwave cooking and could find ABSOLUTELY nothing, not even the most basic food safety tests… yet Russia banned their use for years (I gather they have relaxed this now?).. now NO data is scary, why not?
Chemtrails on the other hand have masses of info, but very little or no data. Huge volumes are produced and nobody has ever proved their existence. No tests have been carried out on the trails that I can find the results of.
There are some rainwater tests, but some of these are unreliable and proof that something is in the rainfall gives no indication of its source, it could be a factory/ industrial chimney hundreds of miles away….
I can find no evidence of a global geoengineering program, and if one did exists I cant imagine how many people would have to be involved, and not one of them has come forward, even though they are spraying themselves and their kids??
Geoengineering is a complex science and at the moment is mostly mathematical models (I HATE mathematical models, they are BS, and I had to work with them for years, I know what I am talking about) see this for example http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013JD020627/abstract
There are some geoengineering experiments that have been carried out, especially in the stratosphere and its here where a lot of the warning are aimed re rogue geoengineers, messing up the stratosphere could kill the planet, destroy ozone layer etc… these are real experiments and genuine warnings…. But we aren’t talking contrails or chemtrails here, that’s much lower in the atmosphere.
In a modern aircraft burnt fuel containing hydrogen is combined with oxygen in the air to form water vapour, which usually condenses to form a visible trail. Because the exhaust gases are at a high temperature the condensation into a trail doesn’t happen until it has a chance to mix with the colder surrounding air, always some distance behind the aircraft
If an aircraft were spraying some form of liquid or powdered solid, such as bacterial agents or aluminum particulates as suggested by many theorists, it should be most visible directly behind the trailing edge of the wing (or wherever the nozzles may be located), becoming less visible as it dissipates in the atmosphere in the wake of the plane. This is exactly what you see when watching a crop duster. In photos of chemtrails the trail starts behind the engines, ie they look like normal contrails.
Having said that, it is possible to make a sprayed agent behave as a contrail. In the case of a liquid, it would have to be heated to the point of vapourization, so that the vapour would re-condense in a manner consistent with a normal contrail – some distance behind the aircraft. If the liquid were used as a medium for biological agents, the temperature required would most likely kill the microbes. If the high vapour temperature didn’t do the job, then the extremely low temperature of the surrounding atmosphere just might. Assuming these biological agents survived the hostile environment, they would tend to have a very slow rate of descent back to earth due to their microscopic size. (Microscopic dust from volcanoes is known to remain in the upper atmosphere for years after an eruption.) In all likelihood, atmospheric disturbances would scatter them and they wouldn’t even land in the area they were released. All in all, this seems an inefficient method of “bombing” the population with any type of harmful agents, if that is the intent.
A reliable method would be to release the agents at very low altitudes, as is done by fire suppression aircraft and crop dusters.
There is no hard and fast rule regarding the elevation at which an aircraft’s engines will produce contrails. Furthermore, there are a variety of atmospheric conditions, such as ambient temperature, relative humidity, concentration of dust particles and winds aloft that will affect how the trail behaves once it is produced. For instance, contrails tend to “persist” when produced in areas of high relative humidity and low temperatures, while they dissipate quickly in the presence of warmer, drier air.
Descending air currents found in wind shear conditions can carry the aircraft’s exhaust gases to lower elevations and warmer temperatures where the moisture will vapourize, rendering it invisible. The portion of the contrail on the other side of the shear will remain in conditions that support its persistence. This accounts for breaks in visible contrails, which some have theorized indicates the “spray nozzles” have been turned off.
Chaff tiny silicate/metallic particles deployed by military aircraft for the purpose of confusing the enemy’s radar and preventing them locking onto the aircraft. Because it’s important to use material with a low molecular weight to maximize the time the chaff remains suspended in the air, aluminum is most commonly used. What would happen if aircraft were deploying continuous streams of chaff and creating grids of the stuff, as claimed by some “chemtrail” theory proponents? Think about it. Radar used by air traffic controllers would be rendered useless. The aircraft would be pitted and the jet blades would corrode quickly... (it aint happening folks!)
In addition to water vapour, jet exhaust contains carbon particles commonly referred to as “soot.” These particles make an excellent surface for moisture to condense upon, thus creating a visible cloud that spreads horizontally in the wake of the plane. But because of its dark colour, the sooty particulate absorbed solar energy which melted the ice crystals, dissipating the contrail. Today’s cleaner and thus clearer jet exhaust allows solar energy to pass right through it, and so contrails persist and spread into high cirrus clouds lasting 24-36 hours.
The reason we see more contrails today, over every city and town, is because air traffic increased over 400% during the past 40 years.
In the 2006 book, Weather Warfare, Jerry Smith explains that persistent contrails are not necessarily chemtrails. From the 1990s on, he explains, all jet engines were modified with a “high bypass turbofan” which increased fuel efficiency and, as a side effect, left persistent contrails that hazed into cirrus clouds after several hours. This is the timeframe when chemtrail sightings begin.
Dane wingington claims precisely the opposite, that "high bypass turbofans" can not create contrails.
Every year, we put more and more cars on the road which produce more and more particulate emissions. Increases in air travel have the same effect. Volcanic activity is on the rise, as is the destruction and burning of rainforests. Drought ridden areas are experiencing unprecedented forest fire activity. One would have to surmise that the concentrations of particulates in the atmosphere are higher now than they were a decade ago. More particulates = more condensation points for moisture = increased cloudiness.
The chemicals that exist in contrails are the same ones produced by vehicles – hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and various oxides of nitrogen. All of these substances are known to have an effect on air quality and chemistry. The scary thing is that aircraft emit these chemicals in large quantities miles up in the air. These are seriously bad for our health.. if you want to call contrails chemtrails then including these chemicals seems ligit… contrails are bad for our health.
Persistent con trails blanket the sky and stop/ reduce solar radiation. Some claim this will leading to global warming, I think it will result in global cooling.. whatever, its still messing with the planets temperature and therefore climate.
Chemtrails seem to be an emotional reaction mixed with fear and mistrust of government combined with a complete failure to understand the very complex science. Chemtrails just are not up to the job of delivering agents to kill people or to effect weather, the particles are too small to be reliable, they could be up there for a long time.. many of the chemicals that are claimed to be in chemtrails would be invisible, not visible…they will use crop dusters if they want to target a local population with aerial bombardment of nasty agents, not contrails.
They have HAARP to really mess with the weather, and maybe some spaying to support this program??? I dont know, but from military aircraft, not commercial ones. That link that mudra provided above seems to suggest commercial aircraft are producing contrails, some persistent, most not, but other planes, non commercial, that produce only persistent contrails..(even chemtrails? i dont know.... nobody does, there is NO DATA).
So… I am still looking for real data... anyone? can anyone prove that chemtrails exist? Can anyone give me real chemistry data? Please (if you do reply) don’t keep posting videos of conspiracy presentations, I want real data. If there is real data in a video can you please take a few lines to explain it to me… I cant easily watch videos…
The gist of what i am saying is that all those videos of commercial aircraft showing 'chem'trails, are in fact contrails. I would further suggest that all commercial aircraft produce only contrails and now (jet design, fuel change and increased atmospheric particulates) very persistent contrails which mess with our health and the planet.... I am not saying there have not been military or other scientific tests, in which chemicals might have been released.
Its quite amazing I can even communicate with you. At an elevation of a couple of thousand metres I am sat sheltering from a most impressive tropical storm, lightning is flashing across the sky and the monsson rains are torrential. There is a local power cut, its dark apart from the lightning flashes…. And sadly I am so close to a cell phone tower I can use my laptop and internet dongle and post to the mists… what a world
(ps i did nick a bit of the above from various sources i downloaded to my hard drive, but all in keeping with my own research into this)