Aquaries1111 wrote:There's cointel pro everywhere. Gotta know who's who in the zoo nanuxi... Like our new baby Dra gon.
I agree to a certain extent but we cannot know with any real confidence who is who on a forum. Especially not in the manner Pris tried to do... This thread it seems was inspired to nut out something for her alone, not for our benefit , and with absolutely no evidence. I mean if you call what she presented evidence ? and yes i did look at it.
she used the use of an emoticon
as a defining piece of evidence, when emoticons aren't an exclusive device, how can it bring a focus to an individual ? short answer is it cant. Actually the emoticon i use was inspired by seeing others use it ... so the genealogy of emoticons as use of evidence is almost insulting to present.
Then you have to look at the people she accused of being part of a psy op ... but if you read the information these individuals share on here its really very hard to show they are trying to corral peoples thinking , there is no pay off for their threads , no wanton of a following , actually there is no logical benefit to the threads they write other that to share experiences and some of the info is really useful to the general readership. Why would a spy or psyop be sharing methods of identifying other spies ? does that not go against their agenda ?
What Pris was doing is creating tension and stifling the sharing of information.
Ultimately there is no police that can help us , every individual needs to become discerning on what they ingest. I have to say the information being shared here is really of a very good standard.
The admin and members are really very easy to deal with , there is no reason to have this sort of discussion. Mind you if there was some concrete evidence then by all means
, but to present it the way Pris has all you do is spook the perp , right ? so again not of any benefit.
And why has Pris taken off when the heat gets a little too hard to handle ? its because she knows there's no way to win the problem shes presented to her self .. and in usual form id imagine she will waltz back at some stage in the future like nothing happened.
Over the years this has been her MO , and she has repeatedly accused people of following her , being underhanded, being part of a psyop, stalking her and the list goes on ... that's a tell imo of things that cant be resolved by flaming on good and long standing members of a forum. Actually abusing fellow members is a violation of the forum rules.
Obviously Ive over explained a small point but in writing this i'm expressing points that should be obvious but to some they may not be, for example: Writing styles for people who have been on forums for a while tend to get similar , reading forums can get tedious if the writing is in a block
its easier to read when its only 2 to 4 lines at a time and in those lines dealing with a point at a time , this is pretty normal and not an indicator of a perp, spelling mistakes is however useful if they are consistent, but then again can be used to put people off as well. For example yes i make spolling messtakes frequently , but that's because im always in a rush having a busy lifestyle , but today i took the time to use a spell checker ... why ? because i have the time, and that's really the only reason, nothing sinister in that is there ?
So really it all boils down to one thing. To whom is the information designed to benefit ? if it looks like it benefits the many, then its a goods chance its done with good intention, even if the information is a little off.. its the intention behind it that's the tell.
In either case there is always benefit to these sorts of things , ive said it before about Pris in particular , that she stirrs up things and gets our mind thinking and i meant it sincerely, but doing this sort of thing , where you cast dispersion's with no evidence on a public forum is a little offensive and in appropriate. Especially at people who thought you were their friend.
Someone that turns on you like that is not a friend , that is someone who is self serving and i don't think we need that here.