Here is what I currently think, take it or leave it as your discretion so dictates.
Love transcends manifestation and so also transcends duality. All is love. All is one.
Among the other things which it is, it is everything in our density of expression. The “stuff” from which everything is made!
Love transcends duality and so to avoid confusion bears not on notions of good nor evil – it encompasses both since it is all.
The law of one (which informs my thinking in this) recognizes all things that are manifest as a distortion of the one. I like this way of describing it as it neatly transcends duality based ways of describing things as they are, untainted by confusing notions of good and evil things.
Light happens when love is doing its thing – expressions of love are light - it is the ongoing action of love. That is why at our density of expression they are virtually synonymous.
However, I am not saying light in this context is limited to the 3D physics. When we think of light we can see, we refer to the different frequencies of radiation that make physical, but Light is also a love phenomena at all densities of expression.
You can (I suppose) have love without light (un-manifested), but you can’t have light without love!
Personally I never (at least I hope I never did) say "in love and light" or “love and light” – which has become, I think, a new age passkey phrase with no real meaning, so much empty waste. I do use the phrase “…THE love and THE light of…”.
In a similar vein some people refer to Jesus Christ, which I think is wrong. I think it should be Jesus the Christ - same sort of idea – the Christ being a real principle quality rather than a person, but one that is at an almost incomprehensibly high quality of love expression.
Bless you all in the love and in the light of the one infinite creator
John..
Love transcends manifestation and so also transcends duality. All is love. All is one.
Among the other things which it is, it is everything in our density of expression. The “stuff” from which everything is made!
Love transcends duality and so to avoid confusion bears not on notions of good nor evil – it encompasses both since it is all.
The law of one (which informs my thinking in this) recognizes all things that are manifest as a distortion of the one. I like this way of describing it as it neatly transcends duality based ways of describing things as they are, untainted by confusing notions of good and evil things.
Light happens when love is doing its thing – expressions of love are light - it is the ongoing action of love. That is why at our density of expression they are virtually synonymous.
However, I am not saying light in this context is limited to the 3D physics. When we think of light we can see, we refer to the different frequencies of radiation that make physical, but Light is also a love phenomena at all densities of expression.
You can (I suppose) have love without light (un-manifested), but you can’t have light without love!
Personally I never (at least I hope I never did) say "in love and light" or “love and light” – which has become, I think, a new age passkey phrase with no real meaning, so much empty waste. I do use the phrase “…THE love and THE light of…”.
In a similar vein some people refer to Jesus Christ, which I think is wrong. I think it should be Jesus the Christ - same sort of idea – the Christ being a real principle quality rather than a person, but one that is at an almost incomprehensibly high quality of love expression.
Bless you all in the love and in the light of the one infinite creator
John..
Last edited by Anchor on Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:32 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : edited to remove PA2 thread context and improve closing para)