Thats the best laugh I've had in ages,
"Icke had once predicted that the world would end in 1997, and was no doubt mightily relieved that his prediction did not come true, allowing him to pursue Pamela.
It was not imminent Armageddon but his own unusual domestic arrangements that provided the backdrop to his new romance.
For Icke was still married and living with his first wife, Linda, and their three children at the family home in Ryde on the Isle of Wight.
To make matters trickier, another woman, Deborah Shaw, had moved into the marital home in 1990"
A regular paragon of virtue !
My honest opinion of this, and please do not think of it as me ranting: Every single person who has ever come out to talk about "forbidden" information of any kind has been the target of BS. Billy Meier's wife turned on him at one point and from what I can see, a similar situation seems to be boiling with Icke. Alex Collier's entire life has fallen apart and he is in financial ruin (and still refuses to make money on what he knows). I have never once felt that Icke is dishonest. Maybe you might think of me as naive but I do not believe in a world where everyone is constantly suspicious of everyone. I am tired of always assuming that someone is lying. It is not how it is supposed to be. Yes Icke has made predictions that are not true. Yes he did once claim to be "the son of god." But honestly people make mistakes and do out of character things. David Icke was the first whistle blower that I ever listened to. I am not ready to label him a fraud just because he is being portrayed as a lunatic. There is a reason why he is being portrayed this way. Icke has not, to my knowledge, commented on these things, and it is my suspicion that his character is being cheaply attacked. There is no evidence that Icke is turning into a "schizophrenic" who believes that his wife is a reptilian. If he does believe this, maybe she is, or maybe Icke truly has been compromised!
My point is that we cannot know for sure. All we know is what the media tells us and I cannot accept the media as the "end all be all" factual source of information. The world has, for the most part, labelled Icke as a "nutty con artist", and that is just the way it is right now. I have experienced reptilians, I have seen one with my own eyes, as I described my ET encounters thread. I know for a fact, for my part anyways, that they exist. Icke was one of the first ones to talk about them and he has given a plethora of information concerning the mysteries of international politics. He is not perfect, he is not a "god", but he is a respectable man. Some don't like him because he charges money for his books, but that does not bother me. That is how he has chosen to make a living and I do not see him as a con artist. Until irrefutable evidence is brought to the table that clearly shows that Icke is lying about everything, that he is insane, and that he has perpetrated a mass scale hoax, and has found some way to infiltrate my mind, allowing me to somehow experience a reptilian, (not likely at all) then no one is going to convince me that this man is a fraud in any way. I even felt the scales (which were quite leathery) and rock solid muscular density of this reptilian. It was not a mere dream. Not everyone gets to have such first hand experiences and I apologize if you think that I myself am lying. I know that not everyone believes what they hear on forums like this.
I can only tell you what I believe, what I have experienced, and that I cannot accept a media portrayal of David Icke. The media lies. The media wants a story. The media will many times tell you what you want to hear at the expense of the truth. Thank you.
EDIT: I just finished the rest of the article. Icke has apparently denied all accusations. This is what happened to Billy Meier. His wife started saying things about him, which he denied. Icke, like Meier, is being targeted in very heartless ways. His own wife seems to be against him now. It's like history repeats itself and my guess is that malevolent "forces" are involved. Icke also has what, two lawsuits now against him? "They" are trying to shut him up by any means necessary. Killing him would only martyr him. This is why most whistle blowers who go public are not assassinated. It would only legitimatize what is being said and would martyr them.